<<

Spring-block tessellations with n springs per block

Bruno Escribano Basque Center for Applied Mathematics Julyan Cartwright CSIC - University of Granada Outline

• 1. Motivation • 2. Introduction: – spring tessellations (tilings) – , quasicrystals and amorphous • 3. Results • 4. Conclusions and outlook

Motivation: types of

crystalline Ice on hexagonal (, , …)

Amorphous ice Ice in the and others… ???

Motivation: ice in the Universe

• Interstellar dust grains, asteroids, comets, surface of planets and moons… • Formed at very low temperatures • Unknown morphology • Unknown structure

Phase transition?

• Different amorphous depending on the deposition temperature.

130 K > Tm > 30 K → Low Amorphous (LDA)

30 K > Tm → High Density Amorphous (HDA)

Possible phase transition HDA → LDA ?

ESEM Setup

Environmental SEM Microscope + liquid He circuit. In low vacuum at temperatures 6-220 K

Grow ice in-situ injecting vapor.

Mesoscopic morphologies

HDA T=6 K LDA T=77 K Hexagonal T=250 K

We still don't know about the molecular structure!

Characterizing amorphous solids

X-ray / neutron diffraction Radial distribution functions Jenniskens et al. APJ (1995) Finney et el. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002).

What kind of structure would produce these results?

2D tessellations

3 regular tessellations

8 semiregular tessellations

Pentagonal tessellations

14 known pentagonal tessellations:

Beyond periodicity: quasicrystals

Penrose tilings (1976)

• Ordered but not periodic (no translational symmetry). • Defined by quasiperiodic functions. i.e. f(x)=cos(x)+cos(αx) where α is irrational

Can this happen naturally?

Beyond periodicity: quasicrystals

Shechtman et al. (1984)

AlCuFe icosahedral phase Beyond periodicity: quasicrystals

is any which possesses an essentially discrete diffraction pattern.” International Crystallographic Union, 1991

Crystalline Amorphous

So we now define crystals (and quasicrystals) through an experimental technique, but...

Spring tessellations: the model

• Spring–block networks with n springs per block Parameters: – maximum coordination number (n) – total number of particles (N) equilibrium distance for springs (d ) – 0 – minimum and maximum radius for neighbor searching (r and r ) min max

Question: What kind lattice would produce the experimental values observed in amorphous ices?

Spring tessellations: the model

Damped harmonic oscillator

Critical damping

Example: n = 6

Results: Effect of n (number of springs per block)

n=2 n=3 n=4

n=5 n=6 Results: radial distribution functions

n=2 n=3 n=4

n=5 n=6 Results: XRD / FFT pattern (crystallization process)

Results: effects of rmax (generating deffects)

rmax =0.090 rmax =0.095 rmax =0.100 rmax =0.110

Conclusions • Experiments: - First electron microscopy images of amorphous ice thin films. - The proposed phase transition HDA-LDA shows no morphology change. • Model: - We can use Fourier transforms to measure crystallinity. - The triangular tiling is the the minimum energy configuration. Outlook

• 3D quasicrystals and amorphs. • Measure residual energies on each spring to find equilibrium configurations and classify according to crystallinity. • Introduce simulated temperatures...

THANK YOU !