Aftto
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Returnee Monitoring Study Minority Returnees to the Republika Srpska - Bosnia and Herzegovina UNHCR Sarajevo June 2000 This study was researched and written by Michelle Alfaro, with the much appreciated assistance and support of Snjezana Ausic, Zoran Beric, Ranka Bekan-Cihoric, Jadranko Bijelica, Sanja Kljajic, Renato Kunstek, Nefisa Medosevic, Svjetlana Pejdah, Natasa Sekularac, Maja Simic, and Alma Zukic, and especially Olivera Markovic. For their assistance with conducting interviews, we are grateful to BOSPO, a Tuzla NGO, and IPTF and OSCE in Prijedor Municipality. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION UNHCR conducted a Returnee Monitoring Framework (RMF) study in the Republika Srpska (RS) between 5 January and 3 March 2000. A total of 194 interviews were carried out, covering 30 villages or towns within 12 municipalities, with minority returnees to the RS who had either fully returned or were in the process of return. The purpose of the this study was to gauge the national protection afforded to minority returnees to the RS, the living conditions of returnees, as well as the positive and negative factors which affect the sustainability of return. For example, interviewees were asked questions about security, schools, pensions, health care, etc. Through the 194 interviews, UNHCR was able to obtain information on 681 persons. Broken down by ethnicity, there were 657 Bosniacs, 13 Bosnian Croats, and 11 Other which included Serbs in mixed marriages, people of mixed ethnicity and several people of other nationalities who had immigrated to BH before the conflict. 20% of the study group was over 60 years old (elderly), 54% was between the ages of 19-59, 20% was school age (7-18 years), and 6% was 0-6 years old. -
Urban Agriculture in Bosnia: Case of Sarajevo Region
Journal of Central European Agriculture, 2013, 14(4), p.1585-1597 DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/14.4.1401 URBAN AGRICULTURE IN BOSNIA: CASE OF SARAJEVO REGION Hamid EL BILALI1, Sinisa BERJAN2*, Jasmina SIMIC3, Aleksandra DESPOTOVIC4, Sabrija CADRO5 and Mirko KULINA2 1Department of Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development; Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari (CIHEAM-MAIB); via Ceglie 9, Valenzano 70010, Bari, Italy 2Faculty of Agriculture, University of East Sarajevo; Vuka Karadzica 30, East Sarajevo 71123, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Tel: + 387 57 342 701; Fax: + 387 57 340 401; E-mail: [email protected], “*correspondence”. 3Agricultural Institute of the Republic of Srpska; Knjaza Miloša 17, 78 000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 4Department for Agro-Economy and Rural Development, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Podgorica; Mihaila Lalića 1, Podgorica 81000, Montenegro 5Faculty of Agriculture and Food Science, University of Sarajevo; Zmaja od Bosne 8, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina ABSTRACT About 39% of the Bosnian population is urban. The main objective of this work is to get an insight into urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) in Bosnia with a focus on legal and regulatory framework, governance, and advisory services’ role. Information were collected by a literature review and semi-structured interviews of 30 urban gardeners as well as extension agents and municipal officers in Sarajevo region. The paper analyses references to UPA in the main agricultural development policies in Bosnia; assesses focus on UPA by extension agents; and analyses urban planning and zoning regulations and budget dedicated to agriculture in many municipalities of Sarajevo region. Semi-structured interviews focused also on economic, environmental, aesthetical and social benefits of UPA. -
Bosnia and Herzegovina
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA S A R A J E V O SPECIAL DEPARTMENT FOR WAR CRIMES Number: KT-RZ-137/05 Sarajevo, 16 November 2009 COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA -Trial Panel- Ref. No: X-KR-05/122 Pursuant to Article 35(2)i) and Article 226(1) and Article 275 of the Criminal Procedure Code of BiH, I hereby file the following A M E N D E D I N D I C T M E N T AGAINST: PREDRAG BASTAH, a.k.a. “Dragan”, son of Radovan and Danica (maiden name Samardžić), born in Podkozlovača, Han Pijesak Municipality, on 18 October 1953, residing in Vlasenica at 21 Vojvode Mišića St., Citizen Identification Number 1810953171428, Serb, citizen of the Republic of Serbia and of BiH, literate, secondary school qualification, married, father of one child of age, indigent, served the army in Belgrade 1972/1973, no previous criminal record, currently held in custody under the Decision of the Court of BiH number X- KR-05/122 dated 28 February 2008. GORAN VIŠKOVIĆ, a.k.a. “Vjetar”, son of Stojan and Milica (maiden name Drakulić), born in Buljevići, Vlasenica Municipality, on 25 November 1954, residing in Šekovići at Jakovice bb/no number/, Citizen Identification Number 2511954183744, Serb, citizen of the RS and BiH, literate, secondary school qualifications, married, father of one underage and three children of age, indigent, served the army in Kraljevo and Niš 1973/1974, convicted by a Judgment of the Basic Court of Vlasenica number 092-0-K-07-000 001 dated 2 July 2007 for the criminal offense referred to in Article 155(1) of the RS CC and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of three (3) months (suspended sentence of 1 one year), the Accused has been imposed the prohibitive measures under the most recent Decision X-KR-05/122 dated 10 July 2009. -
European Social Charter the Government of Bosnia And
16/06/2021 RAP/RCha/BIH/11 (2021) EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER 11th National Report on the implementation of the European Social Charter submitted by THE GOVERNMENT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Articles 11, 12, 13, 14 and 23 of the European Social Charter for the period 01/01/2016 – 31/12/2019 Report registered by the Secretariat on 16 June 2021 CYCLE 2021 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND REFUGEES THE ELEVENTH REPORT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIAL CHARTER /REVISED/ GROUP I: HEALTH, SOCIAL SECURITY AND SOCIAL PROTECTION ARTICLES 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 23 REFERENCE PERIOD: JANUARY 2016 - DECEMBER 2019 SARAJEVO, SEPTEMBER 2020 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 3 II. ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ........... 4 III. GENERAL LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................... 5 1. Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................................... 5 2. Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina ....................................................................... 5 3. Republika Srpska ........................................................................................................... 9 4. Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina .............................................................. 10 IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF RATIFIED ESC/R/ PROVISIONS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA .............................................................................................. -
Role of Microfinance in the Household Reconstruction Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina
MFC Spotlight Note #6 Role of Microfinance in the Household Reconstruction Process in Bosnia and Herzegovina Michal Matul and Caroline Tsilikounas1 January 2004 INTRODUCTION This note presents summary of findings from the study conducted within Imp-Act project2 on the role of micro-enterprise lending in the household reconstruction process during 1996-2002 in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH)3. This research is one of the first of its kind to examine the impact of minimalist micro- enterprise credit on reconstruction. Additionally, because microfinance is still a young and fast learning industry, this study is meant to help engage in a debate about impact of microfinance on reconstruction. It can also contribute to putting forward some propositions to be tested in other post-conflict settings in order to widen the pool of microfinance recipients, and consequently the impact of microfinance on household reconstruction. Many organisations have introduced microfinance as part of their larger portfolio of programming activities aimed at reconstruction and revitalisation of war-torn communities in BiH. The level of international support providing political stability and basic economic security has been high as compared to the African post-war experience4. This in turn has aided the climate for sound microfinance programming and has provided a stable back-drop for their development and growth5. Given that microfinance in the specific environment of BiH during the reconstruction period (1996-2002) was limited to the provision of micro- enterprise credit, the goal of this research is to understand the role played by micro-enterprise credit in household reconstruction. An analysis of multiplier effects and impacts of microfinance at the macro-level goes much beyond the scope of this research. -
Komponenta: Zapošljavanje Kod Poslodavaca PREGLED
Komponenta: Zapošljavanje kod poslodavaca PREGLED POSLODAVACA KOJIMA SU ODOBRENA SREDSTVA PO PROGRAMU ZAPOŠLJAVANJA I SAMOZAPOŠLJAVANJA CILJNIH KATEGORIJA U PRIVREDI U 2021.GODINI NA SJEDNICI UPRAVNOG ODBORA OD 21.05.2021.GODINA ODOBRENO Rb. Biro Filijala Naziv pravnog lica LICA 1 Biro Han Pijesak Istocno Sarajevo "RSC PROMET" d.o.o. 1 2 Biro Zvornik Zvornik Gostionica ''SAČ'' Marica Đokić s.p. Zvornik 1 3 Biro Zvornik Zvornik "SIGMA" Darko Božić s.p. Trnovica 1 4 Biro Modriča Doboj Zanatska radnja "DDD" Boro Đuran s.p. Kužnjača 1 5 Biro Modriča Doboj ''MAVEGO'' Marina Đuran, s.p. Modriča 1 6 Biro Šipovo Banja Luka Mesnica ,,Vitorog,,Milanka Pastir,s.p.Šipovo 1 7 Biro Šipovo Banja Luka ,,MB. MILMAX,, DOO 1 8 Biro Sokolac Istocno Sarajevo "Štamparija" Mile Šuka s.p. Sokolac 1 Zanatska radnja "TOPLOMONT" Mladen Trivić s.p. 9 Biro Čelinac Banja Luka 1 Crni Vrh 10 Biro I. N. Sarajevo Istocno Sarajevo D.O.O. "MAHAGONI" Istočno Novo Sarajevo 2 11 Biro Banja Luka Banja Luka ,,GEO-PLAN'' - FADžAN SALIH s.p. 2 12 Biro Banja Luka Banja Luka "GMP KOMPANI" d.o.o. Banja Luka 1 13 Biro Vlasenica Zvornik JKP "Vlasenica" d.o.o. Vlasenica 15 Zanatsko trgovinska radnja "JASEN" Zdenko Sekulović 14 Biro Foča Trebinje 2 s.p. Foča 15 Biro Foča Trebinje Trgovinska radnja "Agro-trade" Dejan Kapuran s.p. Foča 1 Ugostiteljska radnja "KELT PUB" Žarko Perišić s.p. 16 Biro Foča Trebinje 1 Foča 17 Biro Foča Trebinje Konoba "Zlatna dunja-M" Ljilja Vasović s.p. Foča 2 18 Biro Foča Trebinje "FALCON" d.o.o. -
Tara-Drina National Park
Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged. -
Flood Situation & Intl. Assistance
21 May 2014: Bosnia and Herzegovina – Flood situation & intl. assistance SITUATION International CROATIA Assistance • As of 20 May, according to the UN Countries Office of the Resident Coordinator, the most severely Austria AT affected areas in Bosnia and Herzegovina are Samac, Odzak, Belgium BE Orasje, Doboj, Bijeljina, Brcko Bulgaria BG and Maglaj. • ECHO reports indicate that the Croatia HR situation remains complex, due to Czech Republic CZ numerous landslides that caused damage to houses and roads. Germany DE Furthermore, a number of cities France FR and villages in the flooded areas fYRoM have neither electricity nor running water. Hungary HU • According to the Luxembourg LU Hydrometeorological Institutes of the country, on 21 May in the Latvia LV afternoon, water levels on all B O S N I A Lithuania LT rivers are declining. Weather is Estonia EE a n d improving and no heavy rainfall is Montenegro ME expected in the next 48h. HERZEGOVINA CROATIA Norway NO • The on-site Union Civil Protection Team continues assessing the Poland PL situation and assisting the Romania RO country’s authorities with the coordination of the incoming Slovenia SI international assistance. Slovakia SK Sources: ECHO, UN, National Turkey TR Hydrometeorological Institutes United Kingdom GB abc Location of intl. assistance SERBIA Affected Areas (regions/cantons) Status of Emergency declared Main roads MONTENEGRO Main rivers Floodwaters detected by MODIS, over 19-20 May. Floodwaters detected by Copernicus Emergency Management Service (Observations available only -
Utorak, 06.09.2011. 1 [Otvorena Sednica] 2 [Svedok Je Ušao U Sudnicu]
Svedok: Armin Baždar (nastavak) (otvorena sednica) Strana 18405 Unakrsno ispituje g. Karadži ć (nastavak) 1 utorak, 06.09.2011. 2 [Otvorena sednica] 3 [Svedok je ušao u sudnicu] 4 [Optuženi je ušao u sudnicu] 5 ... Po četak u 09.02h 6 SUDSKI SLUŽBENIK: [simultani prevod] Molimo ustanite. 7 Me ñunarodni krivi čni sud za bivšu Jugoslaviju otvara zasedanje. 8 Možete sesti. 9 SUDIJA KWON: [simultani prevod] Dobro jutro svima. 10 Dobro jutro, gospodine Baždar. 11 SVEDOK: Dobro jutro. 12 SUDIJA KWON: [simultani prevod] Izvolite, gospodine Karadži ću. 13 OPTUŽENI: Hvala, ekselencijo. Dobro jutro, ekselencije. Dobro jutro 14 svima. 15 SVEDOK: ARMIN BAŽDAR [nastavak] 16 Unakrsno ispituje g. Karadži ć: [nastavak] 17 P: Dobro jutro, gospodine Baždar. 18 O: Dobro jutro. 19 SUDIJA KWON: [simultani prevod] Gospodine Baždar, zamoli ćemo Vas da se 20 malo približite mikrofonu ili da govorite malo glasnije radi prevodilaca. Hvala. 21 SVEDOK: U redu. 22 G. KARADŽI Ć: 23 P: Ju če ste nešto rekli o kapama, što nisam bio sasvim razumeo, a onda 24 sam posle video i u Vašoj izjavi da Vi pominjete... ju če ste rekli nešto... "te 25 vaše ulojene kape". Na šta ste mislili, na koje kape? Pominjete u izjavi šubare. 26 Jeste mislili na šubare? 27 28 29 30 utorak, 06.09.2011. Predmet br. IT-95-5/18-T Ovaj transkript je izra ñen na osnovu zvani čnog zvu čnog zapisa na jeziku regiona na činjenog tokom sudskog postupka, poštuju ći verbatim pravilo (doslovan zapis, od rije či do rije či). Kako su na su ñenju korišteni bosanski, hrvatski i srpski jezik (B/H/S), ovisno o originalnom govorniku odnosno prevodiocu, tako su sva tri jezika zastupljena i u transkriptu. -
Refugee’: Return and Local Activism Peter Lippman
28 Bosnia and Herzegovina twenty years on from the Dayton Peace Agreement FMR 50 www.fmreview.org/dayton20 September 2015 Their last name is ‘refugee’: return and local activism Peter Lippman Sustainable refugee return can only take place in Bosnia and Herzegovina when ordinary people and human rights activists are included as full participants in the recovery process. As a result of the 1992-95 war, over two In the eastern Bosnian city of Goražde, million people – fully half the population Bosniaks who had been displaced from of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) – were the industrial suburb of Kopači and from displaced. Of that number, well over a million nearby Višegrad were crowded within the people fled to dozens of countries around city limits. In the northwestern part of the the world. The rest – internally displaced country, displaced Bosniaks from Prijedor persons – ended up in collective centres, and Kozarac had returned from Croatia but in abandoned houses belonging to other were still internally displaced. Many of them displaced persons, or staying with relatives in came back to Sanski Most – not far from their the entities controlled by their ethnicity: Serbs homes but still on the far side of the IEBL. to the Republika Srpska (RS), and Croats and Displaced Srebrenicans who had not fled Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims) to the Federation. abroad were living in poor conditions in Tuzla Although the Croats and Bosniaks and the outskirts of Sarajevo. Meanwhile, were formally allied at the end of the war, Croats who had been expelled (by Serb or, the Federation was ethnically divided as later, by Bosniak forces) from their ancestral well. -
General Information About Mine Situation in B&H
Session 2 Second Preparatory Meeting of the OSCE 23rd Economic and Environmental Forum EEF.DEL/20/15 11 May 2015 ENGLISH only “BHMAC operational activities during and after last year natural disasters in BiH” Goran Zdrale, BHMAC Belgrade, 11 - 13 May 2015 General information about mine situation in B&H ¾ Mine suspect area is 1.170 km2 or 2,3% of total area of BiH ¾ Estimated approximately 120.000 pieces of mine/UXO remained ¾ Total 1.417 affected communities under the impact of mines/UXO ¾ Approximately 540.000 citizens affected, or 15% of total population ¾ In post-war period /after 1996/, there were 1.732 victims, 603 of them fatalities Impact of floods and landslides on mine suspect areas – General assessment ¾Flooded area: 831,4 km2 ¾ Mine suspect area in flooded areas: 48,96 km2 ¾ No. of communities: 36 ¾ No. of communities: 106 ¾ No. of landslides at/near mine suspect areas: 35 ¾ Critical points: active landslides, river beds, river banks and areas flooded by water level above 1m ¾ Large amounts of remaining UXO and SALW ¾Mine danger signs have been shifted away or destroyed Media Campaign ¾ Comprehensive media campaign conducted to warn and inform citizens and volunteers ¾ Published daily announcements for the public at www.bhmac.org ¾ In cooperation with UNDP, continuously presented mine situation maps http://un.ba/stranica/floods-in-bih ¾ 1 theme press conference organised and cooperation established with over 40 national and international media agencies MINE/UXO Awareness ¾ UNDP and EUFOR provided over 10.000 leaflets for distribution as a warning about mine threat ¾ Intervention teams for Mine Awareness warned over 15.000 citizens and volunteers ¾ Intervention teams for Mine Awareness placed or renewed approximately 2.200 mine warning signs MINE/UXO Awareness No. -
Depleted Uranium in Bosnia and Herzegovina Revised Edition: May 2003
First published in Switzerland in 2003 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2003, United Nations Environment Programme. ISBN 92-1-158619-4 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme PO Box 30552 This report by the United Nations Environment Programme was made possible Nairobi by the generous contributions of the Governments of Italy and Switzerland. Kenya Tel: +254 2 621234 Fax: +254 2 624489/90 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org Further information DISCLAIMER Copies of this report may be ordered from: This revised edition includes three chapters translated into the local language. SMI (Distribution Services) Limited The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The P. O . B o x 1 1 9 designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the Stevenage part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or Hertfordshire SG1 4TP, UK its authority, or concerning the