Ridge Vineyards Turns 50 Building a Legacy with Paul Draper and Company
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Impacts of Early Land-Use on Streams of the Santa Cruz Mountains: Implications for Coho Salmon Recovery
Impacts of early land-use on streams of the Santa Cruz Mountains: implications for coho salmon recovery San Lorenzo Valley Museum collection Talk Outline • Role of San Lorenzo River in coho salmon recovery • History of 19th century land-use practices • How these disturbances impacted (and still impact) ecosystem function and salmon habitat Central California Coast ESU Lost Coast – Navarro Pt. Coho salmon Diversity Strata Navarro Pt. – Gualala Pt. Coastal San Francisco Bay Santa Cruz Mountains Watersheds with historical records of Coho Salmon Dependent populations Tunitas Independent populations San Gregorio Pescadero Gazos Waddell Scott San Vicente Laguna Soquel San Lorenzo Aptos Land-use activities: 1800-1905 Logging: the early years • Pit and whipsaw era (pre-1842) – spatially limited, low demand – impacts relatively minor • Water-powered mills (1842-1875) – Demand fueled by Gold Rush – Mills cut ~5,000 board ft per day = 10 whip sawyers – Annual cut 1860 = ~10 million board ft • Steam-powered mills (1876-1905) – Circular saws doubled rate to ~10,000 board ft/day x 3-10 saws – Year-round operation (not dependent on water) – Annual cut 1884 = ~34 million board ft – Exhausted timber supply Oxen team skidding log on corduroy road (Mendocino Co. ca 1851) Krisweb.com Oxen team hauling lumber at Oil Creek Mill San Lorenzo Valley Museum collection oldoregonphotos.com San Vicente Lumber Company (ca 1908): steam donkey & rail line Santa Cruz Museum of Art & History Loma Prieta Mill, Mill Pond, and Rail Line (ca 1888) Santa Cruz Museum of Art & History The Saw-Dust Nuisance “We have always maintained that lumberman dumping their refuse timber and saw-dust into the San Lorenzo River and its tributaries were committing a nuisance. -
Old Vine Field Blends in California: a Review of Late 19Th Century Planting Practices in Californian Vineyards and Their Relevance to Today’S Viticulture
Old Vine Field Blends in California: A review of late 19th century planting practices in Californian vineyards and their relevance to today’s viticulture. A research paper based upon Bedrock Vineyard, planted in 1888. © The Institute of Masters of Wine 2017. No part of this publication may be reproduced without permission. This publication was produced for private purpose and its accuracy and completeness is not guaranteed by the Institute. It is not intended to be relied on by third parties and the Institute accepts no liability in relation to its use. Table of Contents 1. Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Situational Context.......................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Written Works on California Field Blends ............................................................... 4 3.2 International Use of Field-Blending ......................................................................... 4 3.3 Known Benefits of Co-fermentation ......................................................................... 6 4. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1. Historic Primary Document Research .................................................................... -
After 47 Years, Paul Draper Retires Fall 2016
Fall 2016 After 47 Years, Paul Draper Retires Dave Bennion, Charlie Rosen, and Hew Crane, the three scientists from Stanford Research Institute (SRI) 80 years – It seems a most celebratory age to step who had reopened the old Monte Bello Winery as Ridge back. We have two of the finest winemakers and one Vineyards in 1962 had heard me speak about Chile and of the most exceptional vineyard directors, who have our traditional methods. What I described fit with what each been with me for more than twenty years. Though they were doing and their idea that wine was something I have done all major tasting with Eric Baugher, John “real” and a perfect corrective to the “virtual” world that Olney and David Gates, the wines of the last ten years they were pioneering in their work at SRI. In offering are theirs, not mine, so you already know the quality me the job of winemaker they had me taste the ’62 and style of the vintages to come. and ’64 Monte Bellos made from cabernet replanted in the 1940’s at Monte Bello. They had never made wine I grew up on an eighty-acre farm west of Chicago. After before and had simply picked the grapes on a Saturday, attending the Choate School and receiving a degree in crushed them to a small fermentor adding no yeast philosophy from Stanford University, I lived for two and a and went back to their jobs. They had placed a grid to half years in northern Italy, putting in the military service submerge the grapes and came back the next weekend still required by the draft. -
Mapping Ghost Towns in the Santa Cruz Mountains
Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University GSP Projects Student and Alumni Works Fall 12-2020 Mapping Ghost Towns in the Santa Cruz Mountains Sarah Christine Brewer Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/gspproject Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Geographic Information Sciences Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Brewer, Sarah Christine, "Mapping Ghost Towns in the Santa Cruz Mountains" (2020). GSP Projects. 1. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/gspproject/1 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Student and Alumni Works at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in GSP Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mapping Ghost Towns in the Santa Cruz Mountains GSP 510 Final Project BY: SARAH BREWER DECEMBER 2020 Abstract This project identifies areas of archaeological sensitivity for historic resources related to the segment of the South Pacific Coast Railroad that spanned from Los Gatos to Glenwood in the steep terrain of the Santa Cruz Mountains in Central California. The rail line was only in use for 60 years (1880-1940) until the completion of a major highway drew travelers to greater automobile use. During the construction and operation of the rail line, small towns sprouted at the railroad stops, most of which were abandoned along with the rail line in 1940. Some of these towns are now inundated by reservoirs. This project maps the abandoned rail line and “ghost towns” by using ArcGIS Pro (version 2.5.1) to digitize the railway, wagon roads, and structures shown on a georeferenced topographic quadrangle created in 1919 (Marshall et al., 1919). -
Ridge Vineyards, Inc
RIDGE VINEYARDS, INC. SCHEDULE OF WINE PRICES TO WHOLESALERS CONNECTICUT CURRENT PRODUCTS SIZE FOB PRICES Ridge California Monte Bello 2004 750ml/3 $525.00 Ridge California Monte Bello 2005 750ml/3 $487.50 Ridge California Monte Bello 1995 750ml/3 $750.00 Ridge Cabernet Sauvignon Estate, VV 375ml/12 $192.00 Ridge Cabernet Sauvignon Estate, VV 750ml/12 $360.00 Ridge Cabernet Sauvignon Estate, VV 1.5L/6 $369.00 Ridge Chardonnay Estate, VV 375ml/12 $180.00 Ridge Chardonnay Estate, VV 750ml/12 $330.00 Ridge East Bench Zinfandel, VV 750ml/12 $192.00 Ridge Estate Merlot, VV 750ml/12 $330.00 Ridge Geyserville, VV 750ml/12 $264.00 Ridge Geyserville, VV 375ml/12 $144.00 Ridge Geyserville, VV 1.5L/6 $273.00 Ridge Geyserville, VV 3L/1 $106.00 Ridge Geyserville 2009 12/750ml $360.00 Ridge Lytton Springs, VV 375ml/12 $144.00 Ridge Lytton Springs, VV 750ml/12 $264.00 Ridge Lytton Springs, VV 1.5L/6 $273.00 Ridge Lytton Springs, VV 3L/1 $106.00 Ridge Lytton Springs 2009 12/750ml $360.00 Ridge Lytton Estate Petite Sirah, VV 750ml/12 $240.00 Ridge Monte Bello 2012 750ml/3 $277.50 Ridge Monte Bello 2015 375ml/12 $660.00 Ridge Monte Bello 2015 1.5L/3 $649.50 Ridge Monte Bello 2015 3L/1 $465.00 Ridge Monte Bello 2013 750ml/3 $277.50 Ridge Monte Bello 2013 375ml/12 $570.00 Ridge Monte Bello 2013 1.5L/3 $559.50 Ridge Monte Bello 2013 3L/1 $405.00 Ridge Monte Bello 2014 750ml/3 $300.00 Ridge Monte Bello 2015 750ml/3 $322.50 Ridge Monte Bello Chardonnay, VV 12/750ml $450.00 Ridge Pagani Ranch Zinfandel, VV 750ml/12 $240.00 Ridge Paso Robles Zinfandel, VV 750ml/12 -
A California Wine Primer
part one A California Wine Primer Olken_Ch00_FM.indd 1 7/13/10 12:07:51 PM Olken_Ch00_FM.indd 2 7/13/10 12:07:52 PM A Brief History of Wine in California more than two hundred years after Spanish missionaries brought vine cuttings with them from Mexico’s Baja California and established the first of the California missions in San Diego, researchers at Madrid’s National Biotechnical Center, using DNA techniques, have traced those first vines back to a black grape that seems to be a dark-colored relative of the Palomino grape still in use for the production of Sherry. That humble beginning may not seem like it would have much to do with today’s bur- geoning wine industry, but the fact is that the Mission variety became the vine of choice in California as its population grew first through the arrival of trappers and wealthy landowners, then with the small but steady stream of wagon trains that came west out of the country’s heartland and the establishment in the 1840s of the clipper ship trade. By the time the trans- continental railroad was completed in 1869, California’s wine economy had become established, and despite world wars and periods in which the sale of alcohol was banned, the industry hung on and finally exploded into its current shape with the wine boom of the 1970s. Today, the Mission grape is gone, but the wine industry it helped spawn now boasts over a half million acres of wine grapes from one end of the state to the other. -
Conifer Communities of the Santa Cruz Mountains and Interpretive
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ CALIFORNIA CONIFERS: CONIFER COMMUNITIES OF THE SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS AND INTERPRETIVE SIGNAGE FOR THE UCSC ARBORETUM AND BOTANIC GARDEN A senior internship project in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS in ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES by Erika Lougee December 2019 ADVISOR(S): Karen Holl, Environmental Studies; Brett Hall, UCSC Arboretum ABSTRACT: There are 52 species of conifers native to the state of California, 14 of which are endemic to the state, far more than any other state or region of its size. There are eight species of coniferous trees native to the Santa Cruz Mountains, but most people can only name a few. For my senior internship I made a set of ten interpretive signs to be installed in front of California native conifers at the UCSC Arboretum and wrote an associated paper describing the coniferous forests of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Signs were made using the Arboretum’s laser engraver and contain identification and collection information, habitat, associated species, where to see local stands, and a fun fact or two. While the physical signs remain a more accessible, kid-friendly format, the paper, which will be available on the Arboretum website, will be more scientific with more detailed information. The paper will summarize information on each of the eight conifers native to the Santa Cruz Mountains including localized range, ecology, associated species, and topics pertaining to the species in current literature. KEYWORDS: Santa Cruz, California native plants, plant communities, vegetation types, conifers, gymnosperms, environmental interpretation, UCSC Arboretum and Botanic Garden I claim the copyright to this document but give permission for the Environmental Studies department at UCSC to share it with the UCSC community. -
Preliminary Isoseismal Map for the Santa Cruz (Loma Prieta), California, Earthquake of October 18,1989 UTC
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Preliminary isoseismal map for the Santa Cruz (Loma Prieta), California, earthquake of October 18,1989 UTC Open-File Report 90-18 by Carl W. Stover, B. Glen Reagor, Francis W. Baldwin, and Lindie R. Brewer National Earthquake Information Center U.S. Geological Survey Denver, Colorado This report has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial stan dards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Introduction The Santa Cruz (Loma Prieta) earthquake, occurred on October 18, 1989 UTC (October 17, 1989 PST). This major earthquake was felt over a contiguous land area of approximately 170,000 km2; this includes most of central California and a portion of western Nevada (fig. 1). The hypocen- ter parameters computed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) are: Origin time: 00 04 15.2 UTC Location: 37.036°N., 121.883°W. Depth: 19km Magnitude: 6.6mb,7.1Ms. The University of California, Berkeley assigned the earthquake a local magnitude of 7.0ML. The earthquake caused at least 62 deaths, 3,757 injuries, and over $6 billion in property damage (Plafker and Galloway, 1989). The earthquake was the most damaging in the San Francisco Bay area since April 18,1906. A major arterial traffic link, the double-decked San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, was closed because a single fifty foot span of the upper deck collapsed onto the lower deck. In addition, the approaches to the bridge were damaged in Oakland and in San Francisco. Other se vere earthquake damage was mapped at San Francisco, Oakland, Los Gatos, Santa Cruz, Hollister, Watsonville, Moss Landing, and in the smaller communities in the Santa Cruz Mountains. -
Santa Cruz County San Mateo County
Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15 -
Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education ............................................................................................................. -
Dos Niñas Vineyard Berkeley
Growing Partner - Dos Niñas Vineyard Berkeley Tracy Varietal - Cabernet, Cabernet Franc, Nebbiolo, San Francisco Malbec, Merlot, Sangiovese, Syrah Livermore Managed by owner and grower Simon C. Lemus. Simon noticed "A market shift in demand for Merlot San Mateo Martin Ranch Winery began, and in 2006 Dan Martin and I got together 6675 Redwood Retreat Rd, and decided it would be an opportune time to graft 92 Gilroy, CA 95020 www.martinranchwinery.com part of the mature and established Merlot vineyard over to Malbec. With relentless research and input Santa Cruz Mountains San Jose from the University of California at Davis, the best Appellation Malbec grafting clone was selected." 1 Los Gatos 101 Since then, Dan Martin has continued to make Morgan Hill award-winning Merlot under the J.D. Hurley label from Simon's fruit, and now, the grafted Dos Niñas Gilroy 1 152 Malbec is an award-winning part of the Thérèse Santa Cruz Watsonville Vineyards brand as well. Dos Niñas Vineyard Hollister San Juan Bautista About the Region 1225 Day Rd, Gilroy, CA 95020 Simon Limas (Grower) The Santa Clara Valley, better known to the world as "Silicon Valley", has one of the richest histories in 101 California viticulture. The area served an important Monterey role in the early history of California wine and was 1 home to the pioneer winemakers Paul Masson and Carmel Valley Village Charles Lefranc. Greenfield The valley is largely protected from the inuence of the Pacic Ocean by the Santa Cruz Mountains, although coastal breezes that enter a small opening at Hecker Pass in the west and the wider Pajaro Pass to the south help to moderate the climate. -
4 Iconic, Delicious Zindandels to Try
| Back | Text Size: https://triblive.com/lifestyles/fooddrink/14094413-74/4-iconic-delicious-zindandels-to-try 4 iconic, delicious Zindandels to try Dave DeSimone | Wednesday, Sept. 19, 2018, 12:03 a.m. Enjoy a full-range of fruity, yet beautifully balanced California Zinfandels. Mid-September marks a critical moment for zinfandel, the granddaddy of California’s red wine grapes. If growers allow zinfandel clusters to linger on the vines until October, then sugar levels continue rising as the grapes soak up California’s glorious autumn sun. More sugar means more potential alcohol. During the ’90s and early 2000s, alcohol levels mounted alarmingly in a majority of zinfandels. Many wines attained alcohol by volume in the upper-15 percent range. Some even tipped over 16 percent. More alcohol became the norm especially in so- called “cult” zinfandels. Monster alcohol, overripe fruit and pronounced oak influences found favor with prominent wine critics. They typically gave “bigger” wines higher numerical ratings on the 100-point rating scales then dominating consumer attentions. More recently as 100- point scales have become less prominent, sanity has slowly returned. Increasingly, California producers pick zinfandel earlier and throttle back to craft more balanced bottles. Drinkability and compatibility with food have regained importance. The movement represents a return to the zinfandel traditions of the mid-20th century when most wines comfortably landed between 12.5 to 14.5 percent alcohol by volume. The nonprofit association “Zinfandel Advocates Producers,” or “ZAP,” for short, leads the push for appreciating zinfandels as table wines. ZAP offers a terrific place to learn more at Zinfandel.org .