DOCSLIB.ORG

The Beer Hall Putsch*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Beer Hall Putsch* The Beer Hall Putsch* Following the harsh punishments their country suffered from the Treaty of Versailles, the German people swelled with bitter resentment and unrest. By the fall of 1923, having already endured international humiliation and territorial losses, Germany entered into a period of hyperinflation. The nation was on the brink of chaos, and several extremist political groups began to emerge. The Nazi Party, with 55,000 followers, was the most well organized of these radical political groups. The Nazis were based in Bavaria, the largest German state, and were led by the fiery Adolf Hitler. With Nazi members demanding change in Germany, Adolf Hitler believed he had to act quickly or risk losing control of his party. Hitler and the Nazis hatched a plot in which they would kidnap the leaders of the Bavarian government and force them at gunpoint to accept Hitler as their leader. Then, according to their plan, with the aid of a famous German World War I General, Erich Ludendorff, they would win over the German army, proclaim a nationwide revolt, and bring down the German democratic government. Hitler and his followers put this plan into action when they learned there would be a large gathering of businessmen at a beer hall in Munich, the capital city of Bavaria. At this event, the guests of honor were to be the Bavarian leaders they wanted to kidnap. On November 8, 1923, members of Hitler’s private army, known as “storm troopers” or “brown shirts,” under the direction of Hermann Göring surrounded the beer hall. At 8:30 p.m. Hitler and his storm troopers burst into the beer hall causing instant panic. Hitler fired a pistol shot into the ceiling. “Silence!” he yelled at the stunned crowd. “The National Revolution has begun!” Hitler then ordered the three highest officials of the Bavarian government into a back room. Hitler held the men at gunpoint and forced them to come out to the crowd and announce their support of the Nazi party. He threatened them, by declaring “I have four shots in my pistol! Three for you, gentlemen; the last bullet for myself!” In the beer hall, the crowd cheered Hitler as he exclaimed, “A new national government will be named this very day in Munich. A new German National Army will be formed immediately …. Tomorrow will find either a National Government in Germany or us dead!” Hitler continued “I am going to fulfill the vow I made to myself five years ago when I was a blind cripple in the military hospital—to know neither rest nor peace until … on the ruins of the wretched Germany of today there should have arisen once more a Germany of power and greatness, of freedom and splendor.” The crowd in the beer hall roared their approval and sang “Deutschland über Alles” [“Germany above all”]. Hitler was euphoric. This was turning into a night of triumph for him. Tomorrow he might actually be dictator of Germany. But then word came that attempts to take over several military barracks had failed and that German soldiers in the barracks were holding out against Hitler's storm troopers. Hitler decided to leave the beer hall and go to the scene to resolve the problem personally. Leaving the beer hall was a critical error. In his absence, the Nazi revolution quickly began to unravel. The three Bavarian government leaders, who had been forced to swear allegiance to Hitler, secretly slipped out of the beer hall after falsely promising they would remain loyal to the Nazis. Meanwhile, Hitler had no luck in persuading the German soldiers who were holding out in the barracks to surrender. Having failed at that, he went back to the beer hall. When he arrived back at the beer hall, he was aghast to find the revolution fading. There were no plans to topple the current government. Nothing was happening. Early the next morning, the Bavarian leaders who had escaped issued a strong anti-Hitler statement. Still, Hitler, accompanied by Göring, Ludendorff, and roughly 3,000 Nazi supporters proceeded with a march on Munich in an attempt to overthrow the government. Armed police forces blockaded the march, violence erupted, and both sides fired shots. Sixteen Nazis and three police officers were killed. At one point, Hitler’s bodyguard, Ulrich Graf, jumped onto Hitler to shield him and took several bullets, probably saving Hitler's life. Several days later, Hitler was arrested. He stood trial for treason and was found guilty. He was sentenced to five years in prison, although he would only serve one. The collapse of the beer hall putsch seemed to be the end of both Hitler's political career and the Nazi movement. However, while the Beer Hall Putsch was a major setback for Hitler, it did not stop his eventual rise to power in Germany. In fact, Hitler used the publicity he received during his trial to further spread the Nazi message. He turned the Beer Hall Putsch into a propaganda legend that promoted his glory. Furthermore, while in prison, Hitler wrote Mein Kampf [My Struggle], which outlined his political philosophy and his extreme anti-Semitism. Glossary: *coup d'état coup a sudden, illegal attempt to overthrow a government.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Do Students Know and Understand About the Holocaust? Evidence from English Secondary Schools
    CENTRE FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Stuart Foster, Alice Pettigrew, Andy Pearce, Rebecca Hale Centre for Holocaust Education Centre Adrian Burgess, Paul Salmons, Ruth-Anne Lenga Centre for Holocaust Education What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Cover image: Photo by Olivia Hemingway, 2014 What do students know and understand about the Holocaust? Evidence from English secondary schools Stuart Foster Alice Pettigrew Andy Pearce Rebecca Hale Adrian Burgess Paul Salmons Ruth-Anne Lenga ISBN: 978-0-9933711-0-3 [email protected] British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A CIP record is available from the British Library All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permissions of the publisher. iii Contents About the UCL Centre for Holocaust Education iv Acknowledgements and authorship iv Glossary v Foreword by Sir Peter Bazalgette vi Foreword by Professor Yehuda Bauer viii Executive summary 1 Part I Introductions 5 1. Introduction 7 2. Methodology 23 Part II Conceptions and encounters 35 3. Collective conceptions of the Holocaust 37 4. Encountering representations of the Holocaust in classrooms and beyond 71 Part III Historical knowledge and understanding of the Holocaust 99 Preface 101 5. Who were the victims? 105 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Hitler's Personal Security: Gaps and Contradictions by Peter Hoffman*
    Summer 1984 Hitler's Personal Security: Gaps and Contradictions by Peter Hoffman* INTRODUCTION The world, certainly Europe, would look very different if in No­ vember 1938 the Führer and Reich Chancellor of Nazi Germany had been killed. Perhaps people would have regarded him as a "Great German," as a noted colleague has speculated; more important, the suffering, destruction and division resulting from the Second World War might have been avoided. It is well known that attempts to as­ sassinate Hitler were made repeatedly, though it is probably less well known how many such attacks there were. At last count, no fewer than fourteen individuals made at least thirty separate, documented attempts to murder Hitler during the years 1933 to 1945. In the light of so much anti-Hitler energy, it seems reasonable and interesting to look at the circumstances in which Hitler survived all this hostility for so long. The author's interest in those circumstances grew out of a study of anti-Hitler activities, of the German Resistance and their efforts to do away with the Dictator. It soon became clear that the problems of Hitler's personal protection went far beyond those with which modern leaders ordinarily have to live, and that they had far greater implications, for they affected the lives of literally millions of people. The obvious question was how Hitler survived the many attempts on his life. There were conflicting claims as to how easy or difficult it was for a would-be assassin to get close enough to Hitler for a chance to kill him.
    [Show full text]
  • Tangled Complicities and Moral Struggles: the Haushofers, Father and Son, and the Spaces of Nazi Geopolitics
    Journal of Historical Geography 47 (2015) 64e73 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Historical Geography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhg Feature: European Geographers and World War II Tangled complicities and moral struggles: the Haushofers, father and son, and the spaces of Nazi geopolitics Trevor J. Barnes a,* and Christian Abrahamsson b a Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada b Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Postboks 1096 Blindern, Oslo 0317, Norway Abstract Drawing on a biographical approach, the paper explores the tangled complicities and morally fraught relationship between the German father and son political geographers, Karl and Albrecht Haushofer, and the Nazi leadership. From the 1920s both Haushofers were influential within Nazism, although at different periods and under different circumstances. Karl Haushofer’s complicity began in 1919 with his friendship with Rudolf Hess, an undergraduate student he taught political geography at the University of Munich. Hess introduced Haushofer to Adolf Hitler the following year. In 1924 Karl provided jail-house instruction in German geopolitical theory to both men while they served an eight-and-a-half month prison term for treason following the ‘beer-hall putsch’ of November 1923. Karl’s prison lectures were significant because during that same period Hitler wrote Mein Kampf. In that tract, Hitler justifies German expansionism using Lebensraum, one of Haushofer’s key ideas. It is here that there is a potential link between German geopolitics and the subsequent course of the Second World War. Albrecht Haushofer’s complicity began in the 1930s when he started working as a diplomat for Joachim von Ribbentrop in a think-tank within the Nazi Foreign Ministry.
    [Show full text]
  • Fascism Rises in Europe
    3 Fascism Rises in Europe MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW TERMS & NAMES POWER AND AUTHORITY In These dictators changed the •fascism •Nazism response to political turmoil and course of history, and the world • Benito • Mein Kampf economic crises, Italy and is still recovering from their Mussolini • lebensraum Germany turned to totalitarian abuse of power. • Adolf Hitler dictators. SETTING THE STAGE Many democracies, including the United States, Britain, and France, remained strong despite the economic crisis caused by the Great Depression. However, millions of people lost faith in democratic govern- ment. In response, they turned to an extreme system of government called fas- cism. Fascists promised to revive the economy, punish those responsible for hard times, and restore order and national pride. Their message attracted many people who felt frustrated and angered by the peace treaties that followed World War I and by the Great Depression. TAKING NOTES Fascism’s Rise in Italy Comparing and Contrasting Use a chart Fascism (FASH•IHZ•uhm) was a new, militant political movement that empha- to compare Mussolini's sized loyalty to the state and obedience to its leader. Unlike communism, fascism rise to power and his had no clearly defined theory or program. Nevertheless, most Fascists shared goals with Hitler's. several ideas. They preached an extreme form of nationalism, or loyalty to one’s country. Fascists believed that nations must struggle—peaceful states were Hitler Mussolini doomed to be conquered. They pledged loyalty to an authoritarian leader who Rise: Rise: guided and brought order to the state. In each nation, Fascists wore uniforms of a certain color, used special salutes, and held mass rallies.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibstandarte Ss Ado
    40 LEIBSTANDARTE ADOLF HITLER - PREHISTORY DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN OF COMMAND 1923/03/00 Berlin Formation of "Stabswache" 1923/05/00 Designated "Stosstrupp Hitler" 1923/11/09 Munich March to the "Feldherrnhalle" 1925/04/00 Berlin Founding of the SS C.O.: Fuehrer Julius Schreck, 1925/00/00-1936/05/16 (Schutzstaffel) Fuehrer Joseph Berchtold 1926/08/00 Guard duty (Fuehrerschutz) 150 SS men strong 1929/01/06 Guard duty, 270 SS men strong Reichsfuehrer der SS, Heinrich Himmler 1931/01/14 "Eingliederung der SS in SA" Subordinate to: SA (Sturmabteilung) LEIBSTANDARTE SS ADOLF HITLER - UNIT HISTORY 1933/01/30 Berlin Nazi seizure of power, Hitler became Reich Chancellor 1933/03/00 Formation of C.O.: SS Gruppenfuehrer Josef (Sepp) Dietrich, Leibstandarte "Adolf Hitler" 1933/03/00-1939/03/01 1933/05/12 Zossen, Jueterbog Training, guard duty 1933/07/07 Berlin-Lichterfelde Training, indoctrination, expansion of SS Standarten 1933/11/09 Munich Parades, swearing-in ceremony of SS men, party rallies, guard duties, political indoctrination, recruiting of SA men and HJ for LSSAH [email protected] 41 DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN OF COMMAND 1934/07/00 Formation of SS-Oberabschnitte, SS-Standarten, SS-Totenkopf (Wachverbaende), SS-Verfuegungs truppen, Junkerschulen 1935/01/13 Saargebiet Alerts, guard duty during "Volksabstimmung" (plebiscite), 1938/03/00 Linz, Austria Fuehrer proclamation, 1938/09/24 Sudetenland, Czechoslovakia political unrest 1939/03/00 Berlin-Lichterfelde Guard duty, political indoctrination, parades, training, Redesignated 1. SS PzD "LSSAH" Record items of LSSAH 1-175 are listed in Guide No. 27, p. 10-13, reproduced on rolls 192-237 of NARS Microfilm Publication T354 and are described following the unit history.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Hitler a Darwinian?
    Was Hitler a Darwinian? Robert J. Richards The University of Chicago The Darwinian underpinnings of Nazi racial ideology are patently obvious. Hitler's chapter on "Nation and Race" in Mein Kampf discusses the racial struggle for existence in clear Darwinian terms. Richard Weikart, Historian, Cal. State, Stanislaus1 Hamlet: Do you see yonder cloud that's almost in shape of a camel? Shakespeare, Hamlet, III, 2. 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Issues regarding a Supposed Conceptually Causal Connection . 4 3. Darwinian Theory and Racial Hierarchy . 10 4. The Racial Ideology of Gobineau and Chamberlain . 16 5. Chamberlain and Hitler . 27 6. Mein Kampf . 29 7. Struggle for Existence . 37 8. The Political Sources of Hitler’s Anti-Semitism . 41 9. Ethics and Social Darwinism . 44 10. Was the Biological Community under Hitler Darwinian? . 46 11. Conclusion . 52 1. Introduction Several scholars and many religiously conservative thinkers have recently charged that Hitler’s ideas about race and racial struggle derived from the theories of Charles Darwin (1809-1882), either directly or through intermediate sources. So, for example, the historian Richard Weikart, in his book From Darwin to Hitler (2004), maintains: “No matter how crooked the road was from Darwin to Hitler, clearly Darwinism and eugenics smoothed the path for Nazi ideology, especially for the Nazi 1 Richard Weikart, “Was It Immoral for "Expelled" to Connect Darwinism and Nazi Racism?” (http://www.discovery.org/a/5069.) 1 stress on expansion, war, racial struggle, and racial extermination.”2 In a subsequent book, Hitler’s Ethic: The Nazi Pursuit of Evolutionary Progress (2009), Weikart argues that Darwin’s “evolutionary ethics drove him [Hitler] to engage in behavior that the rest of us consider abominable.”3 Other critics have also attempted to forge a strong link between Darwin’s theory and Hitler’s biological notions.
    [Show full text]
  • Erich Ludendorff's Concept of Total War
    Erich Ludendorff's Concept of Total War : General Erich Ludendorff, the ‘Brains’ of the Imperial German war machine for the last two years of the war and progenitor of the German concept of ‘Total War’. He implemented gas at Flanders, as an extension of the idea that the war had to be fought with every tool, every tactic, every strategy that could be put forth for the very survival of the nation. "The military staff must be composed of the right men, of the best and ablest men, efficient in the domain of war on land, on the sea, and in the air, in propaganda, war techniques, economics and politics, and they must be intimately acquainted with national life... They have no right to give orders." - Erich Ludendorff The last two years of the Great War for Germany are a great illustrative example as to the Ludendorff concept of ‘total war’.By late 1916, both Ludendorff and Hindenburg had effectively phased Wilhelm II and much of the Reichstag and diplomatic elements of the government from the decision making processes and were unilaterally making said decisions devoid of a clear chain of responsibility. They were, in effect, the perpetual military dictators of Imperial Germany for the remainder of the war. In Ludendorff’s concept of ‘total war’, the military was the goto, be all for any and all decisions, both political and diplomatic, as they had the chance, whether minute or massive, of influencing the war effort. In effect, the civilian aspects of the government only made policy in response to the needs of the military, not vice-versa, whatever the military needed it received.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Von Schleicher the Soldier and Politics in the Run-Up to National Socialism: a Case Study of Civil-Military Relations
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2013-06 Kurt von Schleicher the soldier and politics in the run-up to national socialism: a case study of civil-military relations Bitter, Alexander B. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/34631 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS KURT VON SCHLEICHER—THE SOLDIER AND POLITICS IN THE RUN-UP TO NATIONAL SOCIALISM: A CASE STUDY OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS by Alexander B. Bitter June 2013 Thesis Co-Advisors: Donald Abenheim Carolyn Halladay Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202–4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704–0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2013 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS KURT VON SCHLEICHER—THE SOLDIER AND POLITICS IN THE RUN-UP TO NATIONAL SOCIALISM: A CASE STUDY OF CIVIL-MILITARY RELATIONS 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Events 1918 – 1938
    Chronology of Events 1918-1938 1918: Czechoslovakia is established after the fall of the Austrian-Hungarian Empire following the First World War. The country is made up of two groups of Slavic peoples, the Czechs and the Slovaks. 1920: The Treaty of Versailles, in which Germany is held responsible for World War I and its consequences, is signed. The treaty deals harshly with a defeated Germany and includes territorial, military, financial and general provisions, including the demilitarization and 15-year occupation of the Rhineland (area between France and Germany), limitations on German armed forces and reparations of 6,600 million pounds. 1921: Adolf Hitler becomes leader of National Socialist German Workers (Nazi) Party. 1923: Beer Hall Putsch (Hitler’s attempt to overthrow regional government in Munich) is unsuccessful and Hitler is jailed. 1925: Mein Kampf (My Struggle), Hitler’s book, is published. 1933: Japan attacks China. The Nazi party gains majority in the German Reichstag and Hitler is named Chancellor. The Reichstag building burns in a “mysterious” fire and all other political parties are abolished. Hitler denounces the Treaty of Versailles. There are public book burnings in Germany. Anti-Jewish laws are passed in Germany: no kosher butchering, no Jewish Civil servants, no Jewish lawyers, quotas for Jews in universities. Any Germans holding non-Nazi political meetings are subject to arrest and imprisonment in concentration camps (the first is Oranienburg, outside of Berlin). Dachau is built as concentration-work camp (specific death camps not yet built, but elderly, those who were very young, disabled or sick have difficulty surviving harsh conditions of camps).
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Kirchubel on the First Nazi: Erich Ludendorff, the Man
    William Brownell, Denise Drace-Brownell. The First Nazi: Erich Ludendorff, The Man Who Made Hitler Possible. Berkeley: Counterpoint, 2016. 356 pp. $30.00, cloth, ISBN 978-1-61902-609-4. Reviewed by Robert Kirchubel Published on H-War (December, 2017) Commissioned by Margaret Sankey (Air University) Members of H-War and students of Erich Lu‐ connection, either. Granted, the two men had dendorff, World War I and Hitler will benefit very some common attitudes and ideas. Ludendorff little from this book. A committee made up of Will and Hitler both had irrational faith in ultimate Brownell, his wife, Denise, and wealthy Czech victory against long odds, but The First Nazi does businessman Alexander Rovt have written a hob‐ not show that the general led to the führer. Post- byist’s view combining these three topics. Al‐ WWI Ludendorff was an opportunist who at‐ though all authors have a doctorate of some sort tached his name to any number of anti-Weimar (two PhDs and one JD), their qualifications are causes and happened to be in Munich in Novem‐ otherwise indeterminate. Most telling, despite a ber 1923, but that does not make him a great many assertions of fact and hundreds of di‐ Parteigenosse. Additionally, the Nazi Party pro‐ rect quotes, the book contains no footnotes or ci‐ gram in those early days was morphing. While it tations. The best the authors can muster are a few surely had many anti-republican, anti-Semitic, in-text references to pertinent book titles, Life and revanchist features with which the general magazine, the Eugene [Oregon] Guard-Register (and many post-WWI Germans) would have newspaper (!), plus some “As Professor Isabel V.
    [Show full text]
  • Two the SS SYSTEM and NAZI IDEOLOGY
    Two THE SS SYSTEM AND NAZI IDEOLOGY In a well-known but now aging book, Gerald Reitlinger claimed that the key for understanding the origins of the SS lay in the Freikorps: to him, there were no clear-cut boundaries between the end of the Freikorps and the beginning of SA and SS (Reitlinger, 1957, p. 4). This claim had the merit to stress some ideological continuities in a defeated and humiliated Germany, given that the Freikorps were animated by the same spirit that would give rise to Nazism. To some extent, however, the origins of the SS were a by-product of some of the Great War’s field tactics. Per se, they had little to do with ideology. 1. The Origins of the SS Late in the Great War, General Erich Ludendorff envisaged a series of attacks, in order to break through the Western front. To that purpose, he set up his assault divisions, spearheaded by shock units: the Stosstruppen, made of fighters able to use all kinds of weapons. These units were inspired by a model that had appeared empirically, on the battlefield, in 1915 (Jardin, 2005, p. 182). And precursors of such units had existed already in 1914. In fact, the inspiration for the SS came from that battlefield culture with which many people were familiar at that time. According to an official account prepared by the Archivamt des SS- Hauptamtes (SS Archive Office), early in the history of the movement, the necessity arose to create a small elite troop, made of tough and trustworthy elements.
    [Show full text]
  • How Much Did the Germans Know About the Final Solution?: an Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College Spring 2010 How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich Issa A. Braman Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses Part of the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons Recommended Citation Braman, Issa A., "How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich" (2010). Honors Theses. 3371. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/3371 This Honors Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Honors College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich by Melissa A. Braman In 1925, while Adolf Hitler was serving a short sentence in jail for his failed Beer Hall Putsch, he wrote in Mein Kampf, “With the year 1915 enemy propaganda began in our country, after 1916 it became more and more intensive till finally, at the beginning of the year 1918, it swelled to a positive flood.” Hitler, a soldier of World War I, had experienced firsthand the power of propaganda during the war. With the failure of Germany to counter-act the Allied propaganda, Hitler noted, “The army gradually learned to think as the enemy wanted it to.”1 Hitler applied this same concept to promoting the rhetoric of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP).
    [Show full text]