Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age Edited by Eran Fisher Open University of Israel Christian Fuchs University of Westminster, UK vi Contents Contents 8 Advertising on Social Media: The Reality behind the Ideology of “Free Access”: The Case of Chinese Social Media Platforms 133 Yuqi Na List of Figures and Tables vii Part IV Rent and the Commons Series Preface viii 9 Mapping Approaches to User Participation and Digital Labour: A Critical Perspective 153 Notes on Contributors x Thomas Allmer, Sebastian Sevignani, and Jernej Amon Prodnik 10 Is the Concept of Rent Relevant to a Discussion of Surplus Part I Foundations Value in the Digital World? 172 Olivier Frayssé 1 Introduction: Value and Labour in the Digital Age 3 Christian Fuchs and Eran Fisher 11 The Demise of the Marxian Law of Value? A Critique of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri 188 2 The Digital Labour Theory of Value and Karl Marx in the Jakob Rigi Age of Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and Weibo 26 Christian Fuchs Part V Productivity in Reproduction 3 The Hands and Brains of Digital Culture: Arguments for 12 Devaluing Binaries: Marxist Feminism and the Value of an Inclusive Approach to Cultural Labour 42 Consumer Labour 207 Marisol Sandoval Kylie Jarrett 13 The Concept of Subsumption of Labour to Capital: Part II Labour and Class Towards Life Subsumption in Bio-Cognitive Capitalism 224 4 A Contribution to a Critique of the Concept Playbour 63 Andrea Fumagalli Arwid Lund 14 Form-Giving Fire: Creative Industries as Marx’s “Work of 5 Marx in Chinese Online Space: Some Thoughts on the Combustion” and the Distinction between Productive and Labour Problem in Chinese Internet Industries 80 Unproductive Labour 246 Bingqing Xia Frederick H. Pitts Part III The Labour of Internet Users Index 261 6 The Exploitation of Audience Labour: A Missing Perspective on Communication and Capital in the Digital Era 99 Brice Nixon 7 Audience Labour on Social Media: Learning from Sponsored Stories 115 Eran Fisher v Notes on Contributors xi political economy of media, communications, culture, and the inter- Contributors net. He is author of Reading Marx in the Information Age: A Media and Communication Studies Perspective on Capital, Volume 1 (2016), Culture and Economy in the Age of Social Media (2015), Digital Labour and Karl Marx (2014), Social Media: A Critical Introduction (2014), OccupyMedia! The Occupy Movement and Social Media in Crisis Capitalism (2014), Foun- Thomas Allmer studied media and communication and political dations of Critical Media and Information Studies (2011), and Internet and science at the University of Salzburg, Austria, and the Victoria Uni- Society: Social Theory in the Information Age (2008). versity, Melbourne, Australia. He is Lecturer in Social Justice at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, and a member of the Uni- Andrea Fumagalli is Associate Professor of Economics in the Depart- fied Theory of Information Research Group, Austria. His publications ment of Economics and Management at University of Pavia and a include Towards a Critical Theory of Surveillance in Informational Capital- militant researcher. He got the Habilitation for full professor in 2013 in ism (2012) and Critical Theory and Social Media: Between Emancipation and Economic Policy. He teaches history of economic thought, theory of Commodification (forthcoming). firms, and economics of knowledge. He also teaches at the Department of Informatic Science, the University of Bologna, and is a member of Eran Fisher is a senior lecturer at the Department of Sociology, Political the Effimera Network, a founder member of Bin-Italy (Basic Income Net- Science, and Communication, the Open University of Israel. He studies work, Italy), and a member of the Executive Committee of BIEN (Basic social issues of digital media technology. His work has been published in Income Earth Network). He is active in the San Precario network. European Journal of Social Theory, Journal of Labour and Society, Media, Cul- His research interests are the transformation of accumulation and ture, and Society, and Information, Communication, and Society. His books valorization processes in contemporary capitalism (cognitive bio- include Media and New Capitalism in the Digital Age: The Spirit of Net- capitalism), labour flexibility and precarization, the theory of money works (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010) and Internet and Emotions (co-edited and basic income hypothesis. with Tova Benski, 2014). Kylie Jarrett is Lecturer in Multimedia in the Department of Media Stud- Olivier Frayssé is Professor of American Studies at the University of ies at the National University of Ireland Maynooth. Her research focuses Paris-Sorbonne. A graduate of the École Normale Supérieure and Institut on the political economy of the commercial web, including studies of d’Études Politiques de Paris, he is Head of the English Department at eBay, Facebook, Google, and podcasting. She is soon to publish a book Paris-Sorbonne and of the Work, Culture and Society in Anglophone entitled Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife, apply- Countries research centre of that university. This centre analyses the ing Marxist feminist perspectives on domestic work to digital media specificities of anglophone societies in relation to the issue of work and value creation. labour and focuses on work-related issues by taking account of the social and cultural contexts of these societies. His latest publications include Arwid Lund will defend his dissertation Realm of Freedom on Swedish “Work and Labour as Metonymy and Metaphor” (TripleC, vol. 12, no. 3, Wikipedians in Library and Information Science in October 2015. He 2014) and “How the US Counterculture Redefined Work for the Age of is affiliated to the Archival, Library & Information, Museum & Cultural the Internet”, in Olivier Frayssé and Mathieu O’Neil (eds.), Digital Labour Heritage Studies Department at the University of Uppsala, Sweden. He and Prosumer Capitalism: The US Matrix (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015). is the author of three books in Swedish, and has worked as a librarian with digital publishing and digital repositories. Christian Fuchs is a professor at and the Director of the University of Westminster’s Communication and Media Research Institute (CAMRI), Yuqi Na is a PhD student from the Communication and Media Research UK. He is editor of the journal tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Institute (CAMRI), University of Westminster. Her main research areas Critique. His field of research is the critical theory and critique of the x xii Notes on Contributors Notes on Contributors xiii are political economy of communication, ideology, social media, and theory of peer production, on the one hand, and his theory of knowl- the internet. edge/information rent, on the other. His articles have appeared in the journals Peer Production, Capital and Class, tripleC,andThe Information Brice Nixon is a visiting assistant professor in the Communications Society. His previous research, resulting in a wide range of publica- Department at the University of La Verne, USA. His research is in the tion, explored post-Soviet politico-economic change in Kazakhstan and areas of the political economy of communication, digital media stud- Russia. ies, media history, journalism studies, communication law and policy, and critical theory. His primary interest is in analysing how communi- Marisol Sandoval is a lecturer at the Department of Culture and Cre- cation industries from the print era to today have sought to determine ative Industries, City University, London. Her research critically deals the conditions of cultural consumption in order to turn communicative with questions of power, responsibility, commodification, exploitation, practices into the business of media and culture. Recent work in this ideology, and resistance in the global culture industry. She is co-editor area includes an article on the “old media” business of Google, in Media, of the open-access journal tripleC – Communication, Capitalism and Cri- Culture & Society. tique. Her book From Corporate to Social Media (2014) looks beyond common understandings of the term social media by providing a criti- Frederick H. Pitts is a PhD researcher with the Department of Social and cal analysis of corporate social (ir)responsibility in the global media and Policy Sciences at the University of Bath, UK. His research explores work communication industries. and work-time in the cultural and creative industries, with a specific focus on the struggle to measure, quantify, and value creative labour. His Sebastian Sevignani studied media and communication, philosophy, approach is informed by a critical engagement with Marxian thought and theology at the University of Salzburg, Austria. He is a member and critical theory, including the German Neue Marx-Lektüre and Italian of the Unified Theory of Information Research Group, Austria, and an post-operaismo. assistant professor at the Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena’s Department of Sociology, Germany. His publications include the book Privacy and Jernej Amon Prodnik is a post-doctoral researcher at the Institute Capitalism in the Age of Social Media (2016). Currently, he works on a of Communication Studies and Journalism, Faculty of Social Sciences, social theory project about a contemporary critical theory of needs. Charles University in Prague (the PolCoRe research group), and a researcher at the Social Communication Research Centre, Faculty of Bingqing Xia is an assistant professor in the Faculty of Humanities Social
Recommended publications
  • Modern Monetary Theory: a Marxist Critique
    Class, Race and Corporate Power Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 1 2019 Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique Michael Roberts [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Roberts, Michael (2019) "Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique," Class, Race and Corporate Power: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. DOI: 10.25148/CRCP.7.1.008316 Available at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol7/iss1/1 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts, Sciences & Education at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Class, Race and Corporate Power by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modern Monetary Theory: A Marxist Critique Abstract Compiled from a series of blog posts which can be found at "The Next Recession." Modern monetary theory (MMT) has become flavor of the time among many leftist economic views in recent years. MMT has some traction in the left as it appears to offer theoretical support for policies of fiscal spending funded yb central bank money and running up budget deficits and public debt without earf of crises – and thus backing policies of government spending on infrastructure projects, job creation and industry in direct contrast to neoliberal mainstream policies of austerity and minimal government intervention. Here I will offer my view on the worth of MMT and its policy implications for the labor movement. First, I’ll try and give broad outline to bring out the similarities and difference with Marx’s monetary theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Marx: Toward a Political Economy of Distributed Media
    tripleC 10(2): 313-333, 2012 ISSN 1726-670X http://www.triple-c.at Digital Marx: Toward a Political Economy of Distributed Media Andreas Wittel Nottingham Trent University, School of Arts and Humanities, Nottingham, United Kingdom, [email protected], http://www.ntu.ac.uk/apps/Profiles/70220-2-2/Dr_Andreas_Wittel.aspx Abstract: This is the claim: In the age of mass media the political economy of media has engaged with Marxist concepts in a rather limited way. In the age of digital media Marxist theory could and should be applied in a much broader sense to this field of research. The article will provide a rationale for this claim with a two step approach. The first step is to produce evidence for the claim that political economy of mass media engaged with Marxist theory in a rather limited way. It is also to explain the logic behind this limited engagement. The second step – which really is the core objective of this article – is an exploration of key concepts of Marx’s political economy - such as labour, value, property and struggle - and a brief outline of their relevance for a critical analysis of digital media. These concepts are particularly relevant for a deeper understanding of phenomena such as non-market production, peer production, and the digital commons, and for interventions in debates on free culture, intellectual property, and free labour. Keywords: Marx, labour, value, property, struggle, political economy of media, digital, distributed media, mass media, internet, network 1. Introduction This is the claim: In the age of mass media the political economy of media has engaged with Marxist concepts in a rather limited way.
    [Show full text]
  • Critiques of Growth in Classical Political Economy: Mill's Stationary
    Critiques of growth in classical political economy: Mill’s stationary state and a Marxian response GARETH DALE ABSTRACT In recent political-economic theories of ‘nature,’ Mill and Marx/Engels form important reference points. Ecological economists see Mill’s ‘stationary state’ as seminal, while Marxists have ‘brought capitalism back in’ to debates on growth and climate change, sparking a Marxological renaissance that has overturned our understanding of Marx/Engels’ opus. This essay explores aspects of Mill’s and Marx/Engels’ work and contemporary reception. It identifies a resemblance between their historical dialectics. Marx’s communism is driven by logics of ‘agency’ and ‘structure’ (including the ‘tendency of profit rates to fall’). In Mill’s dialectic a ‘thesis,’ material progress, calls forth its ‘antithesis,’ diminishing returns. The inevitable ‘Aufhebung’ is a stationary state of wealth and population; Mill mentions countervailing tendencies but fails to consider their capacity to postpone utopia’s arrival. Today, Mill’s schema lives on in ecological economics, shorn of determinism but with its market advocacy intact. It appears to contrast with the ‘productive forces expansion’ espoused by Marx/Engels. They stand accused of ‘Promethean arrogance,’ ignoring ‘natural limits’ and ‘gambling on abundance.’ But I find these criticisms to be ill-judged, and propose an alternative reading, arguing that their work contains a critique of the ‘growth paradigm,’ and that their ‘cornucopian’ ends do not sanction ‘promethean’ means. That Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill inhabited the same city for over twenty years without encountering one another has prompted some of their admirers to compensate for the frustration of this event’s unfortunate non-occurrence by means of fantasy.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3. Convict Labour
    Christian G. De Vito 4.3. Convict Labour Convict labour is “the work performed by individuals under penal and/or adminis- trative control”.¹ It is the work of prisoners and deportees,individuals impressed into the armyand the navy,prisonersofwar,and military convicts. Arguablyaubiq- uitous phenomenon in human history,itstretches from Antiquitytothe present,ap- pears in virtuallyall parts of the world, and cuts across multiple punitive institutions and labour contexts: from the Romanmines to contemporary concentration camps, through the earlymodernMediterranean and Oceanic galleys, penal transportation, workhouses,and penitentiaries. This chapter addresses convict labour from three distinct perspectives. In the first section, Idiscuss its definition by pointing to the ways by which an individual becomes aconvict labourer.Icontend thatsome histor- ical processes are especiallylikelytoproduce such transformation: war; empire and state building;the search for labour flexibility; conceptualizationsofthe functionof punishment; and ideas on ethnicity,class, and gender.The second section highlights the new trends in bothlabour history and the history of punishment that have been, and still are, transformingthe studyofconvict labour.Iarguethatthree approaches have been especiallyrelevant: the reconceptualization of the “workingclass” beyond wagelabour,toinclude otherlabour relations imbricatedinthe process of labour commodification; the attention paid to the multiplicity of forms thatpunishment has taken historically, rather than to single punitive institutions; and the focus on the spatiality of punishment,i.e.onthe fact that punishing has often involved not onlythe immobilization of convicts, but also their relocation across space. The con- cludingsection reflects on how these new insights might provide the basisfor anew theory of the relationships between punishment and labour,both in the past and in the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Words Without Pictures
    WORDS WITHOUT PICTURES NOVEMBER 2007– FEBRUARY 2009 Los Angeles County Museum of Art CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Charlotte Cotton, Alex Klein 1 NOVEMBER 2007 / ESSAY Qualifying Photography as Art, or, Is Photography All It Can Be? Christopher Bedford 4 NOVEMBER 2007 / DISCUSSION FORUM Charlotte Cotton, Arthur Ou, Phillip Prodger, Alex Klein, Nicholas Grider, Ken Abbott, Colin Westerbeck 12 NOVEMBER 2007 / PANEL DISCUSSION Is Photography Really Art? Arthur Ou, Michael Queenland, Mark Wyse 27 JANUARY 2008 / ESSAY Online Photographic Thinking Jason Evans 40 JANUARY 2008 / DISCUSSION FORUM Amir Zaki, Nicholas Grider, David Campany, David Weiner, Lester Pleasant, Penelope Umbrico 48 FEBRUARY 2008 / ESSAY foRm Kevin Moore 62 FEBRUARY 2008 / DISCUSSION FORUM Carter Mull, Charlotte Cotton, Alex Klein 73 MARCH 2008 / ESSAY Too Drunk to Fuck (On the Anxiety of Photography) Mark Wyse 84 MARCH 2008 / DISCUSSION FORUM Bennett Simpson, Charlie White, Ken Abbott 95 MARCH 2008 / PANEL DISCUSSION Too Early Too Late Miranda Lichtenstein, Carter Mull, Amir Zaki 103 APRIL 2008 / ESSAY Remembering and Forgetting Conceptual Art Alex Klein 120 APRIL 2008 / DISCUSSION FORUM Shannon Ebner, Phil Chang 131 APRIL 2008 / PANEL DISCUSSION Remembering and Forgetting Conceptual Art Sarah Charlesworth, John Divola, Shannon Ebner 138 MAY 2008 / ESSAY Who Cares About Books? Darius Himes 156 MAY 2008 / DISCUSSION FORUM Jason Fulford, Siri Kaur, Chris Balaschak 168 CONTENTS JUNE 2008 / ESSAY Minor Threat Charlie White 178 JUNE 2008 / DISCUSSION FORUM William E. Jones, Catherine
    [Show full text]
  • Latin Derivatives Dictionary
    Dedication: 3/15/05 I dedicate this collection to my friends Orville and Evelyn Brynelson and my parents George and Marion Greenwald. I especially thank James Steckel, Barbara Zbikowski, Gustavo Betancourt, and Joshua Ellis, colleagues and computer experts extraordinaire, for their invaluable assistance. Kathy Hart, MUHS librarian, was most helpful in suggesting sources. I further thank Gaylan DuBose, Ed Long, Hugh Himwich, Susan Schearer, Gardy Warren, and Kaye Warren for their encouragement and advice. My former students and now Classics professors Daniel Curley and Anthony Hollingsworth also deserve mention for their advice, assistance, and friendship. My student Michael Kocorowski encouraged and provoked me into beginning this dictionary. Certamen players Michael Fleisch, James Ruel, Jeff Tudor, and Ryan Thom were inspirations. Sue Smith provided advice. James Radtke, James Beaudoin, Richard Hallberg, Sylvester Kreilein, and James Wilkinson assisted with words from modern foreign languages. Without the advice of these and many others this dictionary could not have been compiled. Lastly I thank all my colleagues and students at Marquette University High School who have made my teaching career a joy. Basic sources: American College Dictionary (ACD) American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (AHD) Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology (ODEE) Oxford English Dictionary (OCD) Webster’s International Dictionary (eds. 2, 3) (W2, W3) Liddell and Scott (LS) Lewis and Short (LS) Oxford Latin Dictionary (OLD) Schaffer: Greek Derivative Dictionary, Latin Derivative Dictionary In addition many other sources were consulted; numerous etymology texts and readers were helpful. Zeno’s Word Frequency guide assisted in determining the relative importance of words. However, all judgments (and errors) are finally mine.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploitation’ in the Trafficking in Persons Protocol
    Issue Paper THE CONCEPT OF ‘EXPLOITATION’ IN THE TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS PROTOCOL UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2015 The description and classification of countries and territories in this study and the arrangement of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or regarding its economic system or degree of development. © United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2015 Acknowledgements The present publication was developed by the UNODC Human Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling Section under the overall coordination of Ilias Chatzis and in collaboration with Katharina Peschke and Tatiana Balisova. The publication was drafted by Dr. Anne T. Gallagher (consultant), with the support of Dr. Marika McAdam (consultant), who was responsible for conducting the majority of country surveys. Special thanks are extended to Silke Albert and Simone Heri, UNODC, for their input. UNODC expresses its appreciation to those who attended the expert group meeting in Vienna on 13-14 October 2014 and who provided important input: Ms. Myra Albu (International Organization for Migration), Mr. Saad Salim Aldosari (Qatar), Mr. Ahmad Abdullah Al-Harami (Qatar), Mr. Ahmad Ali Falih Nassir Al-Thani (Qatar), Mr. Alberto Andreani (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe), Ms. Fernanda Alves dos Anjos (Brazil), Ms. Lina Arbelaez (Colombia), Mr. Marco Bonabello (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe), Mr. Patrik Cederlof (Sweden), Mr. Marcelo Colombo (Argentina), Ms. Damienne Darby (Canada), Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • An Access-Dictionary of Internationalist High Tech Latinate English
    An Access-Dictionary of Internationalist High Tech Latinate English Excerpted from Word Power, Public Speaking Confidence, and Dictionary-Based Learning, Copyright © 2007 by Robert Oliphant, columnist, Education News Author of The Latin-Old English Glossary in British Museum MS 3376 (Mouton, 1966) and A Piano for Mrs. Cimino (Prentice Hall, 1980) INTRODUCTION Strictly speaking, this is simply a list of technical terms: 30,680 of them presented in an alphabetical sequence of 52 professional subject fields ranging from Aeronautics to Zoology. Practically considered, though, every item on the list can be quickly accessed in the Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary (RHU), updated second edition of 2007, or in its CD – ROM WordGenius® version. So what’s here is actually an in-depth learning tool for mastering the basic vocabularies of what today can fairly be called American-Pronunciation Internationalist High Tech Latinate English. Dictionary authority. This list, by virtue of its dictionary link, has far more authority than a conventional professional-subject glossary, even the one offered online by the University of Maryland Medical Center. American dictionaries, after all, have always assigned their technical terms to professional experts in specific fields, identified those experts in print, and in effect held them responsible for the accuracy and comprehensiveness of each entry. Even more important, the entries themselves offer learners a complete sketch of each target word (headword). Memorization. For professionals, memorization is a basic career requirement. Any physician will tell you how much of it is called for in medical school and how hard it is, thanks to thousands of strange, exotic shapes like <myocardium> that have to be taken apart in the mind and reassembled like pieces of an unpronounceable jigsaw puzzle.
    [Show full text]
  • Unflattening the Muslim-Other in Social Studies: Student Perspectives & Curricular Approaches Natasha Hakimali Merchant A
    Unflattening the Muslim-Other in Social Studies: Student Perspectives & Curricular Approaches Natasha Hakimali Merchant A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Walter C. Parker, Chair Deborah Kerdeman Dafney B. Dabach Program Authorized to Offer Degree: College of Education ©Copyright 2015 Natasha Hakimali Merchant 4 University of Washington Abstract Unflattening the Muslim-Other in Social Studies: Student Perspectives & Curricular Approaches Natasha Hakimali Merchant Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Walter C. Parker College of Education Scholars of religion and education have claimed the U.S. suffers from religious illiteracy. This, combined with the rise of Islamophobia in the U.S. beckons a need for more research on religious education in Social Studies classrooms. Conceptually grounded in postcolonial theory and standpoint epistemology, this dissertation investigated the experiences of high school Social Studies teachers and Muslim girls from minority communities of interpretation as they encountered curriculum on Islam. This study resulted in the following findings: (1) seven out of eight teachers aimed to counter Islamophobia through their curriculum; (2) teachers primarily used a historical approach and multicultural approach in doing so; (3) the Muslim girls experienced a flattening of their identities in the classroom context; and (4) students perceived a multicultural approach to teaching about Islam
    [Show full text]
  • Invisible Exploitation How Capital Extracts Value Beyond Wage Labour
    The Jus Semper Global Alliance Living Wages North and South Sustainable Human Development January 2019 ESSAYS ON TRUE DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM Invisible Exploitation How Capital Extracts Value Beyond Wage Labour Eva Swidler The Marxist analysis of work under capitalism has long been associated with a preoccupation with wage labour: waged workers as wage-slaves, industrial workers as the revolutionary proletariat, and factory workers as the vanguard. The labour theory of value has been widely seen as applying to the wage form of work and no other. But Marx’s own writings describe other forms of labour under capitalism, and Marxist theorists have long pushed to expand our understanding of exploitation beyond the classic waged relations of production. Capitalists have always used more than the wage form alone to extract surplus product from workers. However, this century is particularly distinguished by its growing reliance on alternate methods of extracting surplus. It’s time for Marxists to rethink our preoccupation with the wage and develop a theory encompassing a common ground of exploitation across a wide variety of extractive relations under capitalism. A recognition of that shared exploitation may prove key if the exploited “class-in-itself” is to become a “class-for-itself,” able to unite and act in solidarity. ©TJSGA/TLWNSI Brief/SD (B021) January 2019/Eva Swidler 1 Invisible Exploitation True Democracy and Capitalism Marx himself analysed two major modes of capitalist exploitation of workers outside the wage form: “so-called primitive accumulation” and reproductive labour. Already in 1913, Rosa Luxemburg proposed in The Accumulation of Capital that primitive accumulation (better translated as “original” accumulation) was not a one-time event somewhere in the past, but instead an ongoing process under capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of State Regulation: the Case of the English Factory Acts
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS Working Paper The Political Economy of State Regulation: The Case of the English Factory Acts by Katherine A. Moos Working Paper 2017-17 UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST The Political Economy of State Regulation: The Case of the English Factory Acts Katherine A. Moos1 Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst September 16, 2017 Abstract This paper proposes a theory of why the state enacted social policy that regulated the length of the working day in 19th century industrial England. This paper will argue that, far from being capable of self-regulation, the capitalist labor market dur- ing Britain’s industrial revolution is best conceptualized as consisting of two major social coordination problems resulting from conflicting interests between and within capital and labor. Left unregulated, this dual social coordination problem caused the overexploitation of labor, with dire consequences for both the capitalist and work- ing classes. The reason why this coordination problem could not self-correct was because the wage-labor bargain contained the externality of unwaged household la- bor. The existence of this externality became deleterious to firms’ profitability and workers’ survival, especially given the high levels of female labor force participation. This social coordination problem justified and required state regulation into indus- trial relations. By conceptualizing protective policy as the solution to a dual social coordination problem caused by conflicting interests among heterogeneous firms and workers, this paper extends the Polanyian framework with an explicit theory of ex- ploitation based on the classical theory of competition and a feminist emphasis on social reproduction and unwaged labor.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal De Minas Gerais Faculdade De Ciências Econômicas Centro De Desenvolvimento E Planejamento Regional
    Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Faculdade de Ciências Econômicas Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional V Ciclo de Seminários em Metodologia e História do Pensamento Econômico HISTORICISMO E SOCIALISMO DE ESTADO NA ALEMANHA Luiz Felipe Bruzzi Curi Pós-Doutorando, Cedeplar/UFMG Doutor em História Econômica (USP) O texto é o capítulo 4 da tese Nationalökonomie nos trópicos: pensamento econômico alemão no Brasil (1889-1945), defendida em fevereiro de 2018 e disponível para consulta na íntegra no repositório da USP. Belo Horizonte 27 de setembro de 2018 Capítulo 4 Historicismo e socialismo de Estado Se não trilhou exclusivamente um Sonderweg, um caminho particular, uma “via prussiana” das ideias econômicas como apressadamente se pode pensar ao generalizar o nacionalismo da jovem escola histórica para um conjunto diverso de pensadores, o pensamento econômico produzido nos Estados germânicos durante o “longo século XIX”, em alguma medida tributário da Nationalökomie, teve traços decisivos de especificidade. Não ficou isolado dos ventos e “fantasmas” – como o que Marx sinalizou no início do Manifesto Comunista de 1848 – que rondavam a Europa nesse período, pois foi influenciado pelo liberalismo britânico e pelo socialismo francês, para citar apenas dois exemplos, mas estruturou-se num ambiente intelectual, político e social peculiar. Um dos principais desafios que se colocam a quem deseja dizer algo sobre as ideias econômicas na Alemanha oitocentista é justamente relacionado com a questão que acabou “contaminando” todas as demais nesse período da história germânica: o que é ser alemão? Seria a mescla de tradições que resultou na Nationalökonomie a expressão de um pensamento especificamente “alemão”? A pergunta é de difícil resposta, mas vale expor algumas intuições nortedoras deste capítulo, que busca situar linhagens de pensamento alemãs, apropriadas no Brasil, no contexto de sua formação e desenvolvimento.
    [Show full text]