Onseepkans Agricultural Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Onseepkans Agricultural Development THE PROPOSED ONSEEPKANS AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT Remainder of the Farm Onseepkans No. 88, Upington Khai-Ma Municipality, Northern Cape Province. ENVIRONMEENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR COMMENT DEA Ref. No.: NC/EIA/07/NAM/KHA/ONS1/2016 JUNE 2017 P.O.Box 5367 Unit 7, Pastorie Park HELDERBERG 7135 Somerset West Tel: (021) 851 1616 CK 97/46008/23 Fax: (086) 512 0154 e-mail: [email protected] VAT4870170513 EnviroAfrica DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION The Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development Contact: Mr. W. V. D. Mothibi Physical: 162 George Street Kimberlite Building, Kimberley Postal: Private Bag X5018 Kimberley 8300 Tel: 053 838 9100 Fax: 053 831 4685/3635 Web: http://agric.ncape.gov.za Onseepkans Agri-Development Final Scoping Report P a g e | ii DETAILS OF THE EAP EAP: Inge Erasmus (BA Hons) under supervision of Mr. P.J.J. Botes (Pri. Sci. Nat.) Company: EnviroAfrica CC Physical: Unit 7, Pastorie Park Reitz Street Somerset West. Postal: PO Box 5367 Helderberg, 7135 Tell: 021 – 851 1616 Fax: 086 – 512 0154 Email: [email protected] or [email protected] EAP qualifications Inge Erasmus: BA (Hons) Geography and Environmental Studies (University of Stellenbosch, 2 years experience P.J.J. Botes: BSc; BSc (Hons) Botany/Plant Ecology (University of Stellenbosch), >15 years’ experience. EAP registrations Registered Professional Botanical, Environmental and Ecological Scientists at SACNASP (South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions). EAP expertise Please refer to Appendix 8 in this report P.O.Box 5367 Unit 7, Pastorie Park HELDERBERG 7135 Somerset West Tel: (021) 851 1616 CK 97/46008/23 Fax: (086) 512 0154 e-mail: [email protected] VAT4870170513 EnviroAfrica Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. The Applicant: ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2. THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY .......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1. Project Scope: ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Need and desirability ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3.1. STRATEGIC CONSIDERATION................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.2. Need ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3. Desirability ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2. National Environnmental Management Act ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1. Listed activities .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.2. Environmental impact assessment ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.2.3. Principles of environmental management .................................................................................................................. 9 2.2.4. EIA Guideline and information document series ...................................................................................................... 10 2.3. National Heritage Resources Act .................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4. National Water Act ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.5. National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act ................................................................................................. 12 2.6. National Forests Act ..................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.7. Northern Cape Nature Conservation Act ...................................................................................................................... 12 3. ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1. Property alternatives .................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.2. Layout alternatives ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1. Alternative 1 – The preferred alternative .................................................................................................................. 16 3.2.2. Alternative 2 – Layout alternative ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3. Activity alternative ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 3.4. The No-Go alternative .................................................................................................................................................. 18 4. SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 19 4.1. Location ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.1. SURVEYOR GENERAL CODE ............................................................................................................................... 19 4.1.2. SITE COORDINATES ............................................................................................................................................. 20 4.2. Climate ......................................................................................................................................................................... 20 4.3. SOIL ............................................................................................................................................................................. 22 4.4. Vegetation .................................................................................................................................................................... 23 4.5. Namakwa District Biodiversity Sector Plan ................................................................................................................... 25 4.6. Freshwater ................................................................................................................................................................... 26 4.7. Socio-economic context ............................................................................................................................................... 26 4.7.1. Demographic Profile of Namakwa District ................................................................................................................ 28 4.8. Heritage features .......................................................................................................................................................... 28 5. PROCESS TO DATE .............................................................................................................................................................. 29 5.1. TASKS UNDERTAKEN TO DATE ................................................................................................................................ 29 5.2. TASKS TO BE UNDERTAKEN DURING THE EIA PROCESS ..................................................................................... 30 5.3. PROFESSIONAL TEAM ............................................................................................................................................... 31 5.4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................................................................ 31 5.4.1. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Recommended publications
  • Explore the Northern Cape Province
    Cultural Guiding - Explore The Northern Cape Province When Schalk van Niekerk traded all his possessions for an 83.5 carat stone owned by the Griqua Shepard, Zwartboy, Sir Richard Southey, Colonial Secretary of the Cape, declared with some justification: “This is the rock on which the future of South Africa will be built.” For us, The Star of South Africa, as the gem became known, shines not in the East, but in the Northern Cape. (Tourism Blueprint, 2006) 2 – WildlifeCampus Cultural Guiding Course – Northern Cape Module # 1 - Province Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Province Overview Module # 2 - Cultural Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Cultural Overview Module # 3 - Historical Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Historical Overview Module # 4 - Wildlife and Nature Conservation Overview Component # 1 - Northern Cape Wildlife and Nature Conservation Overview Module # 5 - Namaqualand Component # 1 - Namaqualand Component # 2 - The Hantam Karoo Component # 3 - Towns along the N14 Component # 4 - Richtersveld Component # 5 - The West Coast Module # 5 - Karoo Region Component # 1 - Introduction to the Karoo and N12 towns Component # 2 - Towns along the N1, N9 and N10 Component # 3 - Other Karoo towns Module # 6 - Diamond Region Component # 1 - Kimberley Component # 2 - Battlefields and towns along the N12 Module # 7 - The Green Kalahari Component # 1 – The Green Kalahari Module # 8 - The Kalahari Component # 1 - Kuruman and towns along the N14 South and R31 Northern Cape Province Overview This course material is the copyrighted intellectual property of WildlifeCampus. It may not be copied, distributed or reproduced in any format whatsoever without the express written permission of WildlifeCampus. 3 – WildlifeCampus Cultural Guiding Course – Northern Cape Module 1 - Component 1 Northern Cape Province Overview Introduction Diamonds certainly put the Northern Cape on the map, but it has far more to offer than these shiny stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Aggeneis-Paulputs 400 Kv Transmission Powerline and Substation Upgrades, Namaqua & Siyanda Districts, Northern Cape Province
    PALAEONTOLOGICAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT: DESKTOP STUDY Proposed AggeneIs-Paulputs 400 kV TransmIssion PowerlIne and SubstatIon Upgrades, Namaqua & SIyanda DistrIcts, Northern Cape ProvInce John E. Almond PhD (Cantab.) Natura Viva cc, PO Box 12410 Mill Street, Cape Town 8010, RSA [email protected] November 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Eskom is proposing to construct a new 400 kV transmission powerline of about 100 km length between the existing Aggeneis substation near Aggeneys to the existing Paulputs substation near Pofadder, Namaqua & Siyanda Districts, Northern Cape Province. Three route alignments (Corridors 1, 2 & 3) are currently under consideration, with a possible short deviation (3A) in the case of Corridor 3. The electrical infrastructure project will also entail upgrading the existing Aggeneis and Paulputs Substations with concomitant small increases in their footprints. The powerline and substation study area is underlain at depth by igneous and metamorphic basement rocks of Precambrian age as well as by a mantle of varied superficial deposits such as aeolian sands, gravels and alluvium of the Pleistocene to Recent Kalahari Group. In terms of palaeontological sensitivity outcrop areas of basement rocks are negligible while the overlying Late Caenozoic superficial deposits are generally of low to very low sensitivity. No highly-sensitive palaeontological sites or no-go areas have been identified within the 400 kV powerline and substation study area. The ancient Koa River Palaeovalley area near Aggenys, largely buried beneath younger cover sands (Fig. 1), may feature important Tertiary fossils at depth but these are very unlikely to be directly impacted by the shallow excavations envisaged for the present electrical infrastructure project.
    [Show full text]
  • Nc Travelguide 2016 1 7.68 MB
    Experience Northern CapeSouth Africa NORTHERN CAPE TOURISM AUTHORITY Tel: +27 (0) 53 832 2657 · Fax +27 (0) 53 831 2937 Email:[email protected] www.experiencenortherncape.com 2016 Edition www.experiencenortherncape.com 1 Experience the Northern Cape Majestically covering more Mining for holiday than 360 000 square kilometres accommodation from the world-renowned Kalahari Desert in the ideas? North to the arid plains of the Karoo in the South, the Northern Cape Province of South Africa offers Explore Kimberley’s visitors an unforgettable holiday experience. self-catering accommodation Characterised by its open spaces, friendly people, options at two of our rich history and unique cultural diversity, finest conservation reserves, Rooipoort and this land of the extreme promises an unparalleled Dronfield. tourism destination of extreme nature, real culture and extreme adventure. Call 053 839 4455 to book. The province is easily accessible and served by the Kimberley and Upington airports with daily flights from Johannesburg and Cape Town. ROOIPOORT DRONFIELD Charter options from Windhoek, Activities Activities Victoria Falls and an internal • Game viewing • Game viewing aerial network make the exploration • Bird watching • Bird watching • Bushmen petroglyphs • Vulture hide of all five regions possible. • National Heritage Site • Swimming pool • Self-drive is allowed Accommodation The province is divided into five Rooipoort has a variety of self- Accommodation regions and boasts a total catering accommodation to offer. • 6 fully-equipped • “The Shooting Box” self-catering chalets of six national parks, including sleeps 12 people sharing • Consists of 3 family units two Transfrontier parks crossing • Box Cottage and 3 open plan units sleeps 4 people sharing into world-famous safari • Luxury Tented Camp destinations such as Namibia accommodation andThis Botswanais the world of asOrange well River as Cellars.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Historic Copper Mine Route
    4. The Pilgrimage Route On this route tourists can visit several churches and missionary stations in the Namakwa area that were established by the Rhenish Mission Society, 1. The Historic Copper Mine Route the London Mission Society, the Church of England, the Roman Catholic Church, the Methodist Church, the Jewish Society and many other church This is a self-drive tour through the region’s historic copper mining towns. The copper mining history dates back to 1685 when Simon van der organisations. These church organisations established both churches and schools in the area and contributed greatly to education and religion in the 7. The Museum Route Stel’s search for gold led him to discover copper at Carolusberg. Commercial copper mining commenced in 1852 and drew to a close in 2004. area. The pastors in charge of these churches also assisted in the negotiations for land and other rights for the local communities. The museums exhibit the historical and cultural lifestyles of the people of the area. The detailed exhibits and information keep tourists occupied for hours. The Okiep Copper Company (OCC), or “Jan Komponie” as the locals referred to it, was once a well-known industry leader in the copper mining We trust that you will be inspired by the relics and remains of the past decades which strived to preserve and develop religion in our communities. sector. This route will take you on a journey through Carolusberg, Springbok, Concordia, Okiep, Alexander Bay, Hondeklip Bay and Nababeep. Town Tourist Attractions We trust that your copper mining town experience will be one to remember.
    [Show full text]
  • Namakwa District Municipality “A Centre of Excellence”
    Namakwa District Municipality “A Centre of Excellence” Integrated Development Plan 2012 – 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword: Executive Mayor 3 Foreword: Municipal Manager 4 1. BACKGROUND 6 1.1. Introduction 6 2. DISTRICT ANALYSIS AND PROFILE 6 2.1. Municipal Geographic Area 6 2.2. Demographic Analysis 8 2.3. Migration 10 2.4. Economic Analysis 11 2.5. Climate Change 13 2.6. Environmental Management Framework 16 3. STRATEGIC GUIDES AND OBJECTIVES 19 3.1. National 19 3.2. Provincial 23 3.3. District 24 3.4. Institutional Structures 26 4. ANALYSIS OF SERVICE DEVELIVERY/DEVELOPMENT ISSUES OF B-MUNICIPALITIES – FEBRUARY 2012 27 5. DEVELOPMENTAL PROJECTS 40 5.1. District Wide Developmental Projects 41 5.2. Sectoral Projects/Programmes 67 5.3. Combined Five Year and Annual Implementation Plan 104 6. MULTI-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN 154 7. DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN 159 8. APPROVAL 159 9. ANNEXURE 159 Process Plan 2012/2013 - Annexure A 160 2 Foreword Executive Mayor In developing this Integrated Development Plan for the next five years, we had to take cognizance of the National Development Plan. - The challenge being in how does Namakwa District Municipality assist in turning a situation of poverty, unemployment and inequality into a position of prosperity, empowerment and equity. - The National Spatial Development Framework further states that Namakwa is a District in distress. This situation of despair can only be addressed through job creation, achieved by infrastructure development and stimulating the new economic drivers for the District, these are: - Tourism, - Renewable Energy and - Mariculture Furthermore, we need to investigate and actively drive the beneficiation of the remaining products mined in our District.
    [Show full text]
  • Hopetown/ Hellsgate Route (Orange River) from Sandton 611Km (Near Kimberley)
    Hopetown/ Hellsgate route (Orange River) From Sandton 611km (Near Kimberley) Orange River The Orange River runs in a gorge creating good rapids. Hells gate, Hubbly Bubbly and Sideways Sarel are some of the bigger rapids on this route. No rapids are compulsory to run and are graded from 2 to 4. Brochures Distances between overnight spots (camp sites) are relative short and a rustic camp is 082 7738 656 dolf available before/or during the tour at additional cost. [email protected] In September and October game abounds next to the river looking for greener pastures on the banks. High cliffs allows for good nesting sites of black and fish eagles. What: Contents Rafting 2 days including 4 meals @ R2618.00 pp Rafting 3 days including 7 meals @ R2932.00pp Rafting 3 days and abseiling including 10 meals @R3368.00 pp 2 Rafting Hellsgate at Hopetown Teambuilding and rafting 2 to 3 days. Conference facilities in Hopetown 2 to 3 days Camp on Hopetown route Abseiling (36m) from the historical “Ou Brug” Angling 3 Padddle down Pella/Krapholl route Accommodation in Hopetown is available 3 to 5 days Rustic camps on the banks of the Orange When: September to May Where: Hopetown (120km from 4 Paddle the scenic Richtersveldt Kimberley-Northern Cape) Who: All adventurous souls over 8 5 to 7 days Corporate groups Private tours Dads & Lads/ Moms & Toms 5 Raft the Onseepkans route School groups 3 to 4 days Why: Big rapids and its close to Joburg Optional: Abseiling, fire walking, teambuilding games, conferencing 6 General information POINTS OF INTEREST Constant water volume but the river sometimes floods We camp on the banks mostly.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Nolloth, Pofadder, Caries, Vioolsdrif, Kamieskroon, Onseepkans, Nababeep, Bergsig, Okiep, Matjieskloof, and Hondeklipbaai
    HOUSEHOLD ENERGY USE IN NAMAQUALAND URBAN AREAS A study of household energy consumption patterns in eleven un-electrified urban settlements M.L.BORCHERS F.M.ARCHER P.RA VENSCROFT University of Cape Town Energy for Development Research Centre Energy Research Institute University of Cape Town April1991 ABSTRACT Current household energy consumption patterns have been examined for the black and coloured urban settlements in Namaqualand of Port Nolloth, Pofadder, Caries, Vioolsdrif, Kamieskroon, Onseepkans, Nababeep, Bergsig, Okiep, Matjieskloof, and Hondeklipbaai. These settlements have either no, or only partial access to, electricity. Fuels used, expenditure on energy, preferred energy sources, and problems regarding energy supply have been studied. Gas is the most widely used fuel in the area, although wood and paraffin are more important energy sources in a few settlements: There is a strong preference for electricity in all areas. Grid electrification using the Eskom "Sl" tariff system is clearly affordable in most settlements, and it is likely to reduce current energy expenditure levels. Full electrification with community participation is recommended for all settlements except for Vioolsdrif and Onseepkans, where the need for a more detailed study has been identified. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project objectives & methodology The project objectives were to examine energy use patterns in the largely unelectrified coloured and black urban settlements of Namaqualand where residents either have no, or only partial access to electricity, and to formulate initial recommendations with respect to energy supply in the area. The settlements studied were : Port Nolloth, Pofadder, Caries, Vioolsdrif, Kamieskroon, Onseepkans, Nababeep, Bergsig, Okiep, Ma~ieskloof, and Hondeklipbaai. Information was gathered by means of interviews based on questionnaires.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT the PROPOSED ESKOM POFADDER- LUIPERSHOEK 11 Kv POWERLINE PROJECT NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE PROPOSED ESKOM POFADDER- LUIPERSHOEK 11 Kv POWERLINE PROJECT NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE Prepared for: ROYAL HASKONING DHV Att: Ms Ntseketsi Lerotholi PO Box 867 Gallo Manor 2052 E-mail: [email protected] On behalf of: ESKOM DISTRIBUTION WESTERN REGION By Jonathan Kaplan Agency for Cultural Resource Management 5 Stuart Road Rondebosch 7700 Ph/Fax: 021 685 7589 Mobile: 082 321 0172 E-mail: [email protected] FEBRUARY 2013 Executive summary Introduction ACRM was appointed to conduct an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) for the proposed construction of the Eskom Pofadder-Luiperdshoek 11 kV powerline near Pofadder in the Northern Cape Province. Eskom is proposing to construct a new 13.7 km long overhead powerline, to supply electricity to previously disadvantaged farmers living in the Luiperdshoek area. The proposed powerline follows the alignment of an existing gravel road, from a point alongside the R358/Onseepkans road, till the farm Luiperdshoek on the Orange River. No alternative routes are proposed. The aim of the study is to locate and map archaeological sites/remains that may be impacted by the proposed project, to assess the significance of the potential impacts and to propose measures to mitigate the impacts. The AIA forms part of the Basic Assessment process that is being conducted by Royal HaskoningDHV. The study entailed the following: 1. A walk through survey of the proposed 13.7 km long route. 2. A desk top study was also done. Findings Very sparse heritage traces were documented during the study. Only three isolated stone artefacts were identified along the route, including two Later Stone Age flakes, and one Middle Stone Age flake.
    [Show full text]
  • I Ndian Ocean a T L a N T Ic O C E
    A B C D E F G H J K L 16°E 18°E 20°E 22°E 24°E 26°E 28°E 30°E 32°E S h a s h e M otloutse Tuli Z I M B A B W E Th EASTERN CAPE FREE STATE LIMPOPO NORTH WEST WESTERN CAPE u ne Dam Index Latitude Longitude Dam Index Latitude Longitude Dam Index Latitude Longitude Dam Index Latitude Longitude Dam Index Latitude Longitude 22°S Limpopo Binfield Park Dam.........G8 S32°41'56.8" E26°54'46.6" Allemanskraal Dam.........H5 S28°17'15.9" E27°08'49.4" Albasini Dam..............K2 S23°06'26.0" E30°07'29.0" Bloemhof Dam..............G4 S27°39'52.1" E25°37'11.7" Beaufort West Dam.........E8 S32°20'39.5" E22°35'07.7" Beitbridge 22°S Bushmans Krantz Dam.......G8 S32°21'26.3" E26°40'38.4" Armenia Dam...............H6 S29°21'52.3" E27°07'40.9" Damani Groot Dam..........K1 S22°51'05.2" E30°30'55.9" Boskop Dam................H4 S26°33'41.0" E27°06'41.6" Berg River Dam............C9 S33°54'21.1" E19°03'19.0" Cata Dam..................H8 S32°37'52.9" E27°07'02.8" Erfenis Dam...............G5 S28°30'35.7" E26°46'40.9" Doorndraai Dam............J2 S24°16'48.6" E28°46'37.1" Bospoort Dam..............H3 S25°33'45.4" E27°19'35.5" Buffeljags Dam............D9 S34°01'07.2" E20°32'03.0" 1 Darlington Dam............F8 S33°12'20.3" E25°08'54.4" Fika Patsu Dam............J5 S28°40'21.1" E28°51'24.1" Ebenezer Dam..............J2 S23°56'27.3" E29°59'05.9" Buffelspoort Dam..........H3 S25°46'49.3" E27°29'12.9" Bulshoek Dam..............C7 S31°59'45.8" E18°47'13.7" Musina 1 d De Mistkraal Weir.........G8 S32°57'28.9" E25°40'27.8" Gariep Dam................G6 S30°37'22.1" E25°30'23.7"
    [Show full text]
  • Explanation of Sheets 2817D (Vioolsdrif) 2818C and D (Goodhouse) and 1819C (Onseepkans)
    DEPARTMENT OF MINES DEPARTEMENT VAN MYNWESE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIESE OPNAME :1 THE GEOLOGY ALONG THE ORANGE RIVER VALLEY I BETWEEN ONSEEPKANS AND THE RICHTERSVELD EXPLANATION OF SHEETS 2817D (VIOOLSDRIF) 2818C AND D (GOODHOUSE) AND 1819C (ONSEEPKANS) BY j: W. VON BACKSTROM'D.Se. AND J. DE VILLlERSt D.Se. Met 'n opsomming in Afrikaans onder die opskrif: DIE GEBIED LANGS DIE ORANJERIVIERVALLEI GELEE TUSSEN ONSEEPKANS EN DIE RICHTERSVELD COPYRIGHT RESERVED/KOPIEREG VOORBEHOU 1972 ( Printed and obtainable from Tile Government Printer, Bo~man Street, Gedruk deur en verkrygbaar van Die Staatsdrukker, Bosmanstraat, Private Bag X65, Pretoria Privaatsak X85, Pretoria Geological map in ~olour on a $~ale of I: 125 000 obtainable separately 60c Geologiese ban in kleur op 'n sbal van I: 125 000 apart verkrygbaar Overseas 75t teen 60c Oorsee 7Sc ·Dire<:tor: Geology, Atomic Energy Board, Pretoria. tOirector: Precambrlan Research Unit, Cape Town University. Both previously of the Geological Survey. Department of Mines, Pretoria. CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ........................................................................ " ........................................ .. 1 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. .. -......... A. LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE AREA .. .......................................... .. B. MEANS OF COMMUNICATION .. ................................................ .. C. PREVIOUS WORK ............................ .. ...... 5 D. PRESENT INVESTIGATION 6 1. Distribution of Work
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of the Area South of Vioolsdrif, Cape Province
    '•"•"••••••"ii.lii.u.......... PEL 257 THE GEOLOGY OF THE AREA SOUTH OF VIOOLSDRIF, CAPE PROVINCE by J.H.W. WARD ATOMIC ENERGY BOARD Pelindaba PRETORIA Republic of South Africa October 1977 3 ill lilllli •Hin!!ffl!J vlHiiR PEL-257 - 1 ATOMIC ENERGY BOARD THE GEOLOGY OF THE AREA SOUTH OF VIOOLSDRIF, CAPE PROVINCE by J.H.W. WARD* *BURSAR ADDRESS. Chamber of Mines Precambrian Research Unit Pelindaba Department of Geology October 1977 University of Cape Town ISBN 0 S6960 670 0 PEL 257 - 2 CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3 SAMEVATHNG 3 ABSTRACT 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1 Physiographic introduction 4 1.2 Geological examination 4 1.2.1 Reports 4 1.2.2 Maps 5 2. NAMAQUALAND MET AMORPHIC COMPLEX 5 2.1 Quartzite 5 2.2 Amphibolite 5 2.3 Cordierite anthophyllite rock 6 2.4 Biotite gneiss and migmatite 6 2.5 Cordierite-sillimanite schists and migmatite 7 2.6 Biotite-cordierite-garnet-staurolite-andalusite-sillimanite rock 7 2.7 Calc-silicate rocks 8 2.8 Leptite 8 2.9 Hornblende gneiss 8 3. ORANGE RIVER GROUP 9 3.1 Haib Subgroup 9 3.1.1 Nous Formation 9 3.1.2 Tsams Formation 10 4. MAFIC INTRUSIVES 11 5. VIOOLSDRIF PLUTONIC COMPLEX 12 5.1 Introduction 12 5.2 Granodiorite 12 5.3 Porphyritic adamellite 14 5.4 Aplogranite 14 6. APLOGRANITIC GNEISS 15 6.1 Aplogranitic gneiss 15 6.2 Pink granitic gneiss 15 7. PEGMATITES 15 8. DYKES 17 8.1 Mafic dykes 17 8.2 Felsic dykes 17 9. THERMOTECTONIC HISTORY 17 9.1 Introduction 17 9.2 Tectonic Provinces in Namaqualand 18 9.3 Structure 19 9.3.1 Introduction 19 9.3.2 Primary tectonic fabric 19 9.3.3 Secondary tectonic fabric 23 9.3.4 Metamorphism 24 9.3.5 Conclusions 29 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrothermal Alteration at the Haib Porphyry Copper Deposit, Namibia: Stable Isotope and Fluid Inclusion Patterns
    Communs geol. Surv. Namibia, 8 (1992/93), 23-35 Hydrothermal alteration at the Haib porphyry copper deposit, Namibia: Stable isotope and fluid inclusion patterns J.M. Barr and D.L. Reid Department of Geochemistry, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, Cape Town, RSA Porphyry-type copper mineralisation is developed in a quartz-feldspar porphyry pluton of the 1900-1730 Ma Vioolsdrif Intrusive Suite, which crops out near the lower Orange River in southern Namibia. Petrographic evidence for hydrothermal alteration is widespread, but most intense in a zone near the central part of the elongate porphyry body. Both the porphyry and metavolcanic country rocks are affected. Potassic alteration that often characterises Phanerozoic porphyry-type copper mineralisation is difficult to distinguish in the Haib deposit because of the high-K nature of the calc-alkaline host rocks. Stable isotope patterns indicate deple- tion in 18O (represented by low δ18O whole rock and mineral values) and deuterium (low δD values) during hydrothermal alteration, which suggests the introduction and circulation of heated meteoric fluids. Preliminary studies have identified two types of fluid, an early high-salinity high-temperature fluid trapped in primary inclusions, and a late-stage low-temperature low-salinity fluid trapped as secondary inclusions in healed fractures. Introduction several university-based research programs to run con- currently with exploration (Blignault, 1977; Reid, 1977; Copper in the Haib River area of southern Namibia Minnitt, 1979). These research results confirmed earlier (Fig. 1) was probably worked, like the richer Okiep de- assessments that the Haib deposit represented a well- posits further south in Namaqualand, in pre-European preserved Precambrian example of an important class times (Smalberger, 1975).
    [Show full text]