DOCSLIB.ORG

Rousettus Aegyptiacus (Pteropodidae) in the Palaearctic: List of Records and Revision of the Distribution Range*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rousettus Aegyptiacus (Pteropodidae) in the Palaearctic: List of Records and Revision of the Distribution Range* Vespertilio 15: 3–36, 2011 ISSN 1213-6123 Rousettus aegyptiacus (Pteropodidae) in the Palaearctic: list of records and revision of the distribution range* Petr BENDA1,2, Mounir ABI-SAID3, Tomáš Bartonička4, Raşit BILGIN5, Kaveh FAIZOLAHI6, Radek K. Lučan2, Haris NICOLAOU7, Antonín REITER8, Wael M. SHOHDI9, Marcel UHRIN10 & Ivan Horáček2 1 Department of Zoology, National Museum (Natural History), Václavské nám. 68, CZ–115 79 Praha 1, Czech Republic; [email protected] 2 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ–128 44 Praha 2, Czech Republic 3 Department of Biology, American University of Beirut, Riadh El Solh 1107, 2020 Beirut, Lebanon 4 Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, CZ–611 37 Brno, Czech Republic 5 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Bogazici University, Bebek, TR–34342 Istanbul, Turkey 6 Mohitban Society, 2010 Mitra Alley, Shariati Street, Tehran, 1963816163, Iran 7 Forestry Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment, Louki Akrita 24, Nicosia, Cyprus 8 South Moravian Museum in Znojmo, Přemyslovců 8, CZ–669 45 Znojmo, Czech Republic 9 Nature Conservation Egypt & Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt 10 Institute of Biology and Ecology, P. J. Šafárik University, Moyzesova 11, SK–040 01 Košice, Slovakia Abstract. The populations of Rousettus aegyptiacus inhabiting the Palaearctic part of the species range represent the only offshoot of the family Pteropodidae beyond tropics. In this contribution, we revised distribution status of the species in different parts of its Palaearctic range, re-examined the literature data and supplemented them with an extensive set of original records obtained in the field during the last two decades. Based on that, we compiled a complete list of the records of R. aegyptiacus from the Palaearctic Region, covering the range delineated by 12–38° N and 26–68° E. Two distribution patterns were recognised: (1) a locally continuous range in the thermo-Mediterranean zone of S Turkey, W Syria, Lebanon, N Israel, and NW Jordan, (2a) a clearly discontinuous distribution in sub-tropical deserts of the Saharo-Sindian zone (S Levant, Egypt incl. Sinai, N Sudan, Arabian Peninsula, S Iran and S Paki- stan), characterised by more or less isolated patches of distribution in desert oases and smaller areas of relatively humid habitats, and (2b) a supposedly continuous linear distribution along the Nile in Egypt, including its extensions in the El Fayum Oasis and Nile Delta. These patterns differ from the distribution characteristics of R. aegyptiacus in the sub-Saharan African range, where this fruit bat is reported to inhabit countinuous belts of rather open habitats stretching over large parts of the continent. Detailed data from the Dakhla Oasis (less than 1,000 km2) in the Western Desert of Egypt illustrate flexibility in roosting and foraging requirements of the species and its considerable capacity for long-term survival in small (2,000–3,000 inds.) and rather isolated populations. Fruit bats, distribution, range, occurrence pattern, Mediterranean, Middle East, Egypt Introduction The Egyptian fruit bat, Rousettus aegyptiacus (Geoffroy, 1810), is the only member of the Pteropo- didae family whose distribution range includes a large part in the Palaearctic Region, and also the only one whose type locality lies in the Palaearctic (the Great Pyramid of Giza, Egypt; Anderson 1902). Considering the whole distribution range, R. aegyptiacus is mostly an Afro-tropical species, * dedicated to Prof. Dr. Vladimír Hanák, one of the founders of the modern research of bats in the Mediterranean, on occasion of his 80th birthday. 3 which reaches the southwestern part of the Palaearctic (Juste & Ibañez 1993, Bergmans 1994, Kwiecinski & Griffiths 1999). In sub-Saharan Africa, it occupies areas around the Gulf of Guinea from Senegal to W Angola (including some islands in the Gulf), and savanna regions of South and East Africa from the Cape to Eritrea. In the Palaearctic, R. aegyptiacus occurs in various parts of Egypt as well as in broad areas along the sea coasts of the Middle East, from SW Turkey and Cyprus along the Levantine and Arabian shores up to S Iran and S Pakistan (Bergmans 1994). The Palaearctic range is reported to be isolated from the sub-Saharan African range by desert areas of northeastern Africa; in the Middle East (S Turkey), this bat reaches northern margin of its distribution range (Harrison & Bates 1991, Bergmans 1994, Benda et al. 2006). The complete review of distribution records of R. aegyptiacus in the Palaearctic was first provided by Kock & Nader (1979), an updated version was presented by Bergmans (1994) along with a detailed description of the whole distribution range. The Palaearctic range of R. aegyptiacus covers the area of the E Mediterannean, Egypt and the Middle East, incl. S Pakistan (delineated by 12–38° N and 26–68° E), but it is obviously quite discontinuous (see also Fig. 1): resident occurrence is confirmed for (1) Cyprus, (2) central parts of the Levant (W Lebanon and N Israel), and (3) northern parts of Egypt (Nile Delta and the Cairo Region), while status of the species in S Turkey, S Egypt, S Arabia, S Iran and S Pakistan, from where isolated records are available, is unclear and in no way suggests continuous occupancy of the whole range. In short, although R. aegyptiacus represents a top curiosity in the bat fauna of the western Palaearctic, the actual extent of its range, its history and character of local occurrence has not been sufficiently comprehended until recently. In response to scarcity of this information we re- -examined the distributional status of the species in some of the regions least known from this point of view. During the last two decades a number of new records were obtained which refine the previous picture both in the geographical and chorological respects. Although some of these records have already been published (see the List of Records), a vast majority of them have not been reported until now and/or not surveyed in regard to the distributional status of the species under study. The density of records and current geographical coverage of the range open a possibility of a detailed quantitative analysis of the range structure and its contextual setting to address the im- plicite questions on the enigmatic phenomenon of the Palaearctic offshoot of the family range. The critical re-examination and a standardised account of all available records are an essential prerequi- site for such analyses and the first step to be undertaken. Just this is the aim of the present study. Material and Methods The distribution data were obtained by screening of available literature reporting local bat records in the respective areas and by direct field studies in particular countries of the Middle East incl. Egypt (see List of Records). Field data were collected with the help of common techniques of field bat study, i.e. direct observations of flying bats, mist-nettings and visits of potential or already known roosts. Besides the direct findings of fruit bat individuals, also their abandoned roosts with undoubted traces of former presence were recorded (see e.g. Hadjisterkotis 2006) as well as their feeding places, i.e. accumulated remnants of food (mainly fruit stones) or the typical splodges from faeces and urine in sheltered places (such as monuments or abandoned rooms, see Figs. 2–5 and/or Benda et al. 2007: 76, Figs. 2, 3). The complete list of distributional records of R. aegyptiacus in the Palaearctic, provided in the following chapter, is arranged according to particular countries and classified in three categories; (1) localities summarised by Bergmans (1994) presented as mere site names; (2) new data published after or overlooked by Bergmans (1994) presented as site names complemented with the quotation of published source of the data; and (3) original records obtained by the authors of this contribution (both new and published), complemented with province name and coordinates of the site, method of data collection and a recorded number of fruit bats as well as the name/s of the collector/s of the data. In this paper we neither report the numerous negative records nor discuss the contextual aspects of the Palaearctic range of the species. These topics will be analysed elsewhere. 4 The list of records is supposedly complete for the ten countries which were in focus of our field study. For Israel, where R. aegyptiacus has been repeatedly intensively investigated as a model species during the last decades (e.g. Korine & Arad 1993, 1999, Korine et al. 1994, 1999, 2004, Krasnov et al. 2007, Tsoar et al. 2011, etc.), the present list is to be looked upon as provisional and obviously incomplete. It summarises just the available literature data (plus some original observations by the authors), including the map records surveyed by Mendelssohn & Yom-Tov (1999). It provides reliable comparative information sufficient for purpose of the present paper (see Figs. 1 and 6). List of Records Bergmans (1994) reported 123 record sites of Rousettus aegyptiacus from its Palaearctic range (Fig. 1). The other literature data not included in Bergmans’ (1994) review, mostly those published during the last two decades, report the species from 91 localities. With further 134 new record sites, the total number of localities where R. aegyptiacus was recorded within the Palaearctic range rose to 348. A majority of them (57.3%) was evidenced during the last two decades (see also Table 1 and Figs. 6, 11, 17). The minimum number of records in the particular countries is as follows: Turkey – 30 sites, Cyprus – 51, Syria – 5, Lebanon – 39, Israel and the Palestinian Territories – 32, Jordan – 20, Egypt – 64 (without new records from the Dakhla Oasis, see below), North Sudan – 2, Saudi Arabia – 5, Yemen – 19, Oman – 47, United Arab Emirates – 1, Iran – 31, Pakistan – 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel INTRODUCING GREECE Edited by Francis King by INTRODUCING SPAIN Joan Comay by Cedric Salter INTRODUCING YUGOSLAVIA with a Foreword by by Lovett F
    l In this series INTRODUCING INTRODUCING AMERICA by Barbara Kreutz and Ellen Fleming INTRODUCING GERMANY by Michael Winch Israel INTRODUCING GREECE edited by Francis King by INTRODUCING SPAIN Joan Comay by Cedric Salter INTRODUCING YUGOSLAVIA With a foreword by by Lovett F. Edwards David Ben-Gurion METHUEN & CO LTD 11 New Fetter Lane, London, E.C.4 .....,...... a.. - ... -.. x... mao·--z .. ,1.. .,..,- ..a-··""s"'' ..' -·-----.- ..... ~~-~ ... _.... .......... ___, .... ..._, ...... ~.- .. ,.... ,. _ First published in the U.S.A. with the title Everyone's Guide to Israel First published in Great Britain 1963 Copyright© 1962 Joan Comay Second Revised Edition 1969 Copyright © 1969 Joan Comay To Michael Printed in Great Britain by Cox & Wyman Ltd, Fakenham, Norfolk SBN 416 26300 3 (hardback edition) SBN 416 12500 x (paperback edition) This book is available in both hardback and paperback binding. The paperback edition is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated with­ out the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. INTRODUCING ISRAEL the vaulted roof is a fine example of Crusader architecture. Part of a hexagonal chapel stands near the original landing stage. This was one of three chapels attached to a large round church similar to the mother church of the Order in J eru­ salem. When the English Bishop Pococke visited the area in CHAPTER ELEVEN the eighteenth century, church and chapels, though ruined, were still standing, and in his travel account he wrote of the Haifa ' ..
    [Show full text]
  • Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region”
    Islamic Republic of Iran Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization ICHHTO “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” for inscription on the World Heritage List (Additional Information) UNESCO World Heritage Convention 2017 1 In the name of God 2 Evaluation of the nomination of the “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” (Islamic Republic of Iran) for inscription on the World Heritage List This report is submitted in response to the ICOMOS letter of GB/AS/1568-AddInf-1, dated 28September 2017 on the additional information for the nomination of Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region. The Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization is grateful to ICOMOS for its devotion to conservation and preservation of historic monuments and sites. The objective of this detailed report is to clarify the issues raised by ICOMOS in the aforementioned letter. Additional information for clarification on: - Serial approach - Risks and Factors affecting the property - Protection - Management - Monitoring 1- Serial approach Could the State Party kindly provide information on the rationale, methodology and criteria (here not referring to the nomination criteria), which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination? Could the State Party kindly outline the contribution of each site component, to the overall Outstanding Universal Value in the substantial, scientific and discernible way, as outlined in paragraph 137b of the Operational Guidelines? For clarifying, the question will be explained in the parts of (1-a) and (1-b) in details: 1-a: Rationale, methodology and criteria which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination: The rationale which guided the selection of the component sites is based on a methodology which takes into account their historical characteristics and at the same time considers their association with the regional landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Continuity in Sasanian Rock Reliefs
    0320-07_Iran_Antiq_43_12_Thompson 09-01-2008 15:04 Pagina 299 Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLIII, 2008 doi: 10.2143/IA.43.0.2024052 COMPOSITION AND CONTINUITY IN SASANIAN ROCK RELIEFS BY Emma THOMPSON (University of Sydney, Australia) Abstract: The cliffs of Iran are adorned with rock reliefs from every period of its long history. During the years that the Sasanian dynasty ruled Iran, artists added to this collection considerably. These monuments are individual capsules of infor- mation on the general political, religious, historical and artistic milieu of the time. This paper presents a method for furthering our understanding of the Sasanian period through an analysis of the composition of each Sasanian relief. The analy- sis is based on the hypothesis that composition will serve as an indicator of artis- tic continuity and change and encode an artistic signature of sorts indicating the artists’ background and training. The initial results suggest that the reliefs of the early Sasanian period reflect the work of artists from at least two schools of art. Keywords: Sasanian, rock reliefs, composition. The kings of the Sasanian dynasty ruled Iran for over four hundred years. During the first eighty-five years of the dynasty (AD 224-309) there were seven changes of crown, many military gains and losses and thirty rock carvings were commissioned to commemorate these events. Most of these were carved in Fars, the homeland of the dynasty: eight were carved in the company of the Achaemenid tombs at Naqsh-i Rustam; six line the way to Shapur’s city at Bishapur; four were carved in the open air grotto at Naqsh- i Radjab; two were carved near Ardashir’s first city at Firuzabad and the rest were carved as single reliefs at various locations across the province of Fars: Barm-i Dilak, Sar Mashhad, Sarab-i Bahram, Guyum, Rayy, Darab- gird, and Tang-i Qandil.
    [Show full text]
  • Sasanian Bas-Reliefs at Tang-E Chogan Under Invasion of Lichens and Fungi
    81 I RAN Sasanian Bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan under Invasion of Lichens and Fungi At several places near the town of Bishapur, which was founded by Sasanian King Shapur I (241–272) and was situated on the road between Persis and Elam, the King also had the sides of the Bishapur River gorge decorated with huge historical reliefs commemorating his triple triumph over Rome. The six reliefs at Tang-e Chogan show scenes such as Shapur enslaving the Roman Emperor; the King and his courtiers; or rows of registers with files of soldiers and horses, in a deliberate imitation of the narra- tive scenes on the Trajan column in Rome. The critical situation of these bas-reliefs is described in an arti- cle by CAIS (The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies): Lichens and vegetation growing in the cavities and cracks of the Sasanian bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan, a part of the ruins of the ancient city of Bishapur in southwestern Iran, are gradually Sasanian bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan (photo: Pedram Veisi) destroying these irreplaceable antiquities. The lichens and veg- etation are clearly visible on all six bas-reliefs, which are located 19 kilometres north of Kazerun, reported the Persian service of site historical monuments in Fars Province, has made no efforts the Mehr News Agency. One of the bas-reliefs depicts Shapur I, to save the ancient relics from the lichens and vegetation attacks. the Persian King of Kings who consolidated and expanded the The ancient city of Bishapur is also in peril by several other fourth Iranian dynastic empire founded by his father, Ardashir I.
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Methods of Ground Water Storage Changes from the Different Date Sources in Kafr
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 10, Issue 9, September-2019 1735 ISSN 2229-5518 Detecting Methods of Ground Water Storage Changes from the Different Date Sources in Kafr Elsheikh Governorate, Egypt. Mahmoud El-Mewafi, Fawzi Hamid Fawzi Zarzoura and Heba Basyouni Ibrahim* ABSTRACT- Gravity monitoring is used to detect the groundwater storage changes, over traditional techniques that are very costly and require strong workers, which are very difficult. The Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measures Terrestrial Water Storage (ΔTWS) for a regional area, it is the total mass of water found in the soil column (such as, surface water, soil moisture, snow, and groundwater). In this study, Grace Data was used to calculate the changes in groundwater storage (ΔGWS) in both 2005 and 2010 in Kafr El-Sheikh, Desouk and fwa by selecting four random points in each of them and calculating the terrestrial water storage from GRACE, though global land date assimilations systems (GLDAS) soil moisture was calculated and subtracted from the terrestrial Water Storage to calculate the groundwater. In this study, data on the changes in groundwater reserves were obtained by contour maps and thus the data obtained from GRACE were verified by comparing them where the maximum values and the lowest values of the differences respectively are 20.76 and -3.68 mm. Index Terms GRACE, Gravity, Traditional, GLDAS, Soil moisture, Storage —————————— —————————— 1. INTRODUCTION Ater is considered an important resource in Egypt for many From the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) water users. The next fight will be on water because of the mission {2}.
    [Show full text]
  • Visions of a General Framework for Egypt's Cultural Policy
    Visions of a General Framework for Egypt’s Cultural Policy November 2015 1 2 Table of Content Dr. Ismail Serageldin’s Introduction 5 Introduction: Support to Cultural Diversity and 7 Creativity in Egypt 1- Preliminary Overview 29 Egypt in five cultural circles 31 Our Arab Culture and the Culture of Knowledge 33 About the Egyptian Identity 37 Countering the Current Conditions 38 2- The Current Cultural State of Affairs 41 The Egyptian Cultural Society 44 Key cultural issues pertaining to the book, 46 the song, the cinema, and the theater 3- Cultural Reform in Egypt 57 Vision and Objective 57 Specific Objectives 57 About Education and Media 61 The Creative Industries 64 4- Institutions and Mechanisms 67 - Museums 68 - Libraries and the Family Libraries 69 - Ministry of Antiquities 71 - General Authority for Cultural Palaces 72 - General Egyptian Book Authority 74 - The High Council of Culture 75 - Arts Academy 75 - Visual Arts Sector 77 - Theater Section 79 - Folklor and Performance Arts Sector 80 3 - The Opera 80 - Film Industry 81 - The National Center for Traditional Crafts 84 - Scientific Societies 85 - Oral Heritage 86 - Cultural Fields and reforming their positions 86 - Dar al Kuttub and National Archives 87 - The National Translation Center 87 5- Funding 89 The Cultural Development Fund 90 Antiquities Fund 90 The Private and Public Sectors 91 Using Government Guarantee 91 6- The Digital Revolution and How to Deal with It The New Knowledge Revolution (The Seven Pillars) 93 First: Parsing, Life, and Organization 93 Second: Image and
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Spell of Egypt
    The Spell of Egypt by Robert Hichens The Spell of Egypt by Robert Hichens Etext prepared by Dagny, [email protected] and John Bickers, [email protected] PREPARER'S NOTE This text was prepared from a 1911 edition, published by The Century Co., New York. The Spell of Egypt by Robert Hichens CONTENTS THE PYRAMIDS THE SPHINX SAKKARA page 1 / 128 ABYDOS THE NILE DENDERAH KARNAK LUXOR COLOSSI OF MEMNON MEDINET-ABU THE RAMESSEUM DEIR-EL-BAHARI THE TOMBS OF THE KINGS EDFU KOM OMBOS PHILAE "PHARAOH'S BED" OLD CAIRO I THE PYRAMIDS Why do you come to Egypt? Do you come to gain a dream, or to regain lost dreams of old; to gild your life with the drowsy gold of romance, to lose a creeping sorrow, to forget that too many of your hours are sullen, grey, bereft? What do you wish of Egypt? The Sphinx will not ask you, will not care. The Pyramids, lifting page 2 / 128 their unnumbered stones to the clear and wonderful skies, have held, still hold, their secrets; but they do not seek for yours. The terrific temples, the hot, mysterious tombs, odorous of the dead desires of men, crouching in and under the immeasurable sands, will muck you with their brooding silence, with their dim and sombre repose. The brown children of the Nile, the toilers who sing their antique songs by the shadoof and the sakieh, the dragomans, the smiling goblin merchants, the Bedouins who lead your camel into the pale recesses of the dunes--these will not trouble themselves about your deep desires, your perhaps yearning hunger of the heart and the imagination.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMUNA CAVI REFERENCE LIST 080818.Xlsx
    A LAPP GROUP COMPANY REFERENCE LIST ISO 9001, ISO14000, ISO 50001 CERTIFIED COUNTRY DESTINATION PLANT / PROJECT PURCHASER / END USER YEAR Italy Vezzano Power Plant ENEL Trento 1994 Greece Keratsini Keratsini Unit 8 Power Plant ALCATEL/ANSALDO 1995 Indonesia Java Barat Gunung Salak G.P.P. 55 MW ALCATEL/ANSALDO 1995 Singapore Singapore Senoko Power station Ext. of Gas Turb. SIEMENS/POWER GEN. (SENOKO) Pte. Ltd. 1995 Algeria Annata No.2 Furnace Ribuild ITALIMPIANTI SpA/SIDER C. SIDERURGIQUE 1996 China Ningbo NZP Plant FROESCHL/SIEMENS ERLAGEN 1996 China Shanghai Project D68 SINCO ENGINEERING/ CHINAYIZHENG CH. FIBER C 1996 Colombia Covenas Oleoducto Central S.A. Full Field Dev. BOUYGUES OFFSHORE 1996 Egypt Alexandria Alexandria Petroleum Crude Oil Furn. KIRCHNER ITALIA Spa 1996 Italy Augusta (SR) LSADO Project Step 2 ESSO ITALIANA S.p.A. 1996 Italy Civitavecchia Torrevaldaliga N. Plant ENEL- CIVITAVECCHIA 1996 Italy Milazzo Heaters Automation AGIP PETROLI 1996 Italy Milazzo Control Centralization LC-Finer AGIP PETROLI 1996 Italy Pallanza Project CF-762 SINCO ENGINEERING/ITALPET 1996 Italy Priolo Gargallo (Sr) Interconnecting Plant ERG PETROLI 1996 Italy Priolo Gargallo (Sr) Revamping Unit 200 A NHDS ISAB S.p.A. 1996 Italy Priolo Gargallo (Sr) Thermoelectric Power Plant ENEL-Palermo 1996 Italy Sarroch Hydrocracking Plant SARAS Spa 1996 Italy Sarroch Intrinsically-safe Plant HOECHST ITALIA Spa 1996 Pakistan Hub River Hub Power Project 4x323 MW ANSALDO/HUBCO POWER Co 1996 S.Arabia Yanbu Ibn Rushd/PTA Plant Hot Oil Furnace KIRCHNER/TECNIMONT 1996 Belgium Feluy Manufacturing Units TELEREX S.A. / PANTOCHIM 1997 Egypt Suez 10 H-1 Heater Revamp. Project KIRCHNER ITALIA S.p.A./ SUEZ OIL 1997 France St.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid Over Palestine
    Metula Majdal Shams Abil al-Qamh ! Neve Ativ Misgav Am Yuval Nimrod ! Al-Sanbariyya Kfar Gil'adi ZZ Ma'ayan Baruch ! MM Ein Qiniyye ! Dan Sanir Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid over Palestine Al-Sanbariyya DD Al-Manshiyya ! Dafna ! Mas'ada ! Al-Khisas Khan Al-Duwayr ¥ Huneen Al-Zuq Al-tahtani ! ! ! HaGoshrim Al Mansoura Margaliot Kiryat !Shmona al-Madahel G GLazGzaGza!G G G ! Al Khalsa Buq'ata Ethnic Cleansing and Population Transfer (1948 – present) G GBeGit GHil!GlelG Gal-'A!bisiyya Menara G G G G G G G Odem Qaytiyya Kfar Szold In order to establish exclusive Jewish-Israeli control, Israel has carried out a policy of population transfer. By fostering Jewish G G G!G SG dGe NG ehemia G AGl-NGa'iGmaG G G immigration and settlements, and forcibly displacing indigenous Palestinians, Israel has changed the demographic composition of the ¥ G G G G G G G !Al-Dawwara El-Rom G G G G G GAmG ir country. Today, 70% of Palestinians are refugees and internally displaced persons and approximately one half of the people are in exile G G GKfGar GB!lGumG G G G G G G SGalihiya abroad. None of them are allowed to return. L e b a n o n Shamir U N D ii s e n g a g e m e n tt O b s e rr v a tt ii o n F o rr c e s Al Buwayziyya! NeoG t MG oGrdGecGhaGi G ! G G G!G G G G Al-Hamra G GAl-GZawG iyGa G G ! Khiyam Al Walid Forcible transfer of Palestinians continues until today, mainly in the Southern District (Beersheba Region), the historical, coastal G G G G GAl-GMuGftskhara ! G G G G G G G Lehavot HaBashan Palestinian towns ("mixed towns") and in the occupied West Bank, in particular in the Israeli-prolaimed “greater Jerusalem”, the Jordan G G G G G G G Merom Golan Yiftah G G G G G G G Valley and the southern Hebron District.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeoseismicity of the Mounds and Monuments Along the Kazerun Fault (Western Zagros, Sw Iranian Plateau) Since the Chalcolithic Period
    Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLIX, 2014 doi: 10.2143/IA.49.0.3009238 ARCHAEOSEISMICITY OF THE MOUNDS AND MONUMENTS ALONG THE KAZERUN FAULT (WESTERN ZAGROS, SW IRANIAN PLATEAU) SINCE THE CHALCOLITHIC PERIOD BY Manuel BERBERIANa , Cameron A. PETRIEb, D.T. POTTSc, Alireza ASGARI CHAVERDId, Amanda DUSTINGe, Alireza SARDARI ZARCHIf, Lloyd WEEKSg, Parsa GHASSEMIh & Reza NORUZIi (a Ocean County College, USA; b University of Cambridge, UK; c ISAW, NYU, USA; d Shiraz University, Iran; e University of Sydney, Australia; f Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, Iran; g University of Nottingham, UK; h Kohan Diar-e Mehr Archaeological Inst., Shiraz, Iran) Abstract: Our multidisciplinary investigation represents off-fault archaeoseismic indicators recorded in the archaeological remains at mounds and structural ele- ments of monuments situated along the Kazerun fault in the western Zagros Mountains since the Chalcolithic period. The study revealed two large magnitude earthquakes (~Mw >7.0, possibly ~7.3) ca. 3850-3680 BC and ca. 3030 BC with return periods of ~735 +? years at Tol-e Spid. Detecting only two earthquakes during the 4,000 year life span of archaeological mound is incompatible with the 3.6-3.9 slip rate along the Kazerun fault. After a long gap in data, a strong earth- quake indicator is recorded ca. 400-200 BC in Qal’eh Kali; all located to the north of the Kazerun fault bend. On the contrary, in addition to the vandalism episodes during the invasions of the Moslem Arabs (16/637), the Mongol hordes (1219- 1250), and Timur (1370-1405), the structural elements of the royal Sasanid city of Bishapur, located to the south of the fault bend, indicated archaeoseismic indicators of four possible earthquakes within a period of 800 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Safety Inspection in Egypt Institutional, Operational, and Strategy Report
    FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION IN EGYPT INSTITUTIONAL, OPERATIONAL, AND STRATEGY REPORT April 28, 2008 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Cameron Smoak and Rachid Benjelloun in collaboration with the Inspection Working Group. FOOD SAFETY INSPECTION IN EGYPT INSTITUTIONAL, OPERATIONAL, AND STRATEGY REPORT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR POLICY REFORM II CONTRACT NUMBER: 263-C-00-05-00063-00 BEARINGPOINT, INC. USAID/EGYPT POLICY AND PRIVATE SECTOR OFFICE APRIL 28, 2008 AUTHORS: CAMERON SMOAK RACHID BENJELLOUN INSPECTION WORKING GROUP ABDEL AZIM ABDEL-RAZEK IBRAHIM ROUSHDY RAGHEB HOZAIN HASSAN SHAFIK KAMEL DARWISH AFKAR HUSSAIN DISCLAIMER: The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................... 1 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 3 Vision 3 Mission ................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives .............................................................................................................. 3 Legal framework..................................................................................................... 3 Functions...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Governorate Area Type Provider Name Card Specialty Address Telephone 1 Telephone 2
    Governorate Area Type Provider Name Card Specialty Address Telephone 1 Telephone 2 Metlife Clinic - Cairo Medical Center 4 Abo Obaida El bakry St., Roxy, Cairo Heliopolis Metlife Clinic 02 24509800 02 22580672 Hospital Heliopolis Emergency- 39 Cleopatra St. Salah El Din Sq., Cairo Heliopolis Hospital Cleopatra Hospital Gold Outpatient- 19668 Heliopolis Inpatient ( Except Emergency- 21 El Andalus St., Behind Cairo Heliopolis Hospital International Eye Hospital Gold 19650 Outpatient-Inpatient Mereland , Roxy, Heliopolis Emergency- Cairo Heliopolis Hospital San Peter Hospital Green 3 A. Rahman El Rafie St., Hegaz St. 02 21804039 02 21804483-84 Outpatient-Inpatient Emergency- 16 El Nasr st., 4th., floor, El Nozha Cairo Heliopolis Hospital Ein El Hayat Hospital Green 02 26214024 02 26214025 Outpatient-Inpatient El Gedida Cairo Medical Center - Cairo Heart Emergency- 4 Abo Obaida El bakry St., Roxy, Cairo Heliopolis Hospital Silver 02 24509800 02 22580672 Center Outpatient-Inpatient Heliopolis Inpatient Only for 15 Khaled Ibn El Walid St. Off 02 22670702 (10 Cairo Heliopolis Hospital American Hospital Silver Gynecology and Abdel Hamid Badawy St., Lines) Obstetrics Sheraton Bldgs., Heliopolis 9 El-Safa St., Behind EL Seddik Emergency - Cairo Heliopolis Hospital Nozha International Hospital Silver Mosque, Behind Sheraton 02 22660555 02 22664248 Inpatient Only Heliopolis, Heliopolis 91 Mohamed Farid St. El Hegaz Cairo Heliopolis Hospital Al Dorrah Heart Care Hospital Orange Outpatient-Inpatient 02 22411110 Sq., Heliopolis 19 Tag El Din El Sobky st., from El 02 2275557-02 Cairo Heliopolis Hospital Egyheart Center Orange Outpatient 01200023220 Nozha st., Ard El Golf, Heliopolis 22738232 2 Samir Mokhtar st., from Nabil El 02 22681360- Cairo Heliopolis Hospital Egyheart Center Orange Outpatient 01200023220 Wakad st., Ard El Golf, Heliopolis 01225320736 Dr.
    [Show full text]