DOCSLIB.ORG

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST I DARREN EASTMAN 21446 Oneda Co

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST I DARREN EASTMAN 21446 Oneda Co 1 DARREN EASTMAN 21446 Oneda Court 2 Los Gatos, CA 95033 3 [email protected] Pro Se 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OAKLAND 8 9 DARREN EASTMAN, Case No. 4:18-CV-05929-JST 10 Plaintiff, FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 12 APPLE, INC., Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 13 Defendant. Courtroom: 6 14 15 Action Filed: 8/13/2018 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page INTRODUCTION …………………………………...…………………….................................. 1 3 4 LEGAL STANDARD 5 A. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) …………………………………………….. 2 6 C. Correction of Ownership and § 256 …………...…………………………….………... 4 7 8 FACTUAL BACKGROUND OF INVENTIONS 9 A. Phone-finding Patents …...………………………………………………………...….. 7 B. Passbook …...………………………………………………………………………… 16 10 11 CAUSES OF ACTION 12 A. PATENT NONJOINDER 13 Count 1 ‘367 Remotely Locating and Commanding a Mobile Device ……..….…...….. 22 14 Count 2 ‘310 System & Method for Remotely Initiating Lost Mode on Device ………. 32 15 Count 3 ‘896 Remotely Initiating Lost Mode on a Computing Device ……………....... 45 Count 4 ‘32 Device Locator Disable Authentication ….….…………….....…….……... 59 16 Count 5 ‘98 Bypassing Security Authentication on a Lost Device to Return to Owner .. 65 17 Count 6 ‘776 Remotely Locating and Commanding a Mobile Device ...……...……..… 71 18 Count 7 ‘530 Remotely Receiving and Communicating Commands to Mobile Device . 77 19 Count 8 ‘14 Location-Based Ticket Books ….…....…..…...…….....…………………... 92 20 Count 9 ’495 Location-Based Ticket Books ….…....…..…...…...………..…………... 108 21 Count 10 ‘513 System and Method for Providing Electronic Event Tickets …………. 114 22 Count 11 ‘530 Delivery of Push Notifications to an Inactive Computing Device …..... 117 Count 12 ‘748 Remotely Locating and Commanding a Mobile Device ……………… 121 23 Count 13 ‘7530 Remotely Receiving & Communicating Commands to Device …...... 127 24 Count 14 ‘709 Bypassing Security Authentication on a Lost Device to Return Owner 131 25 Count 15 ‘839 Device Locator Disable Authentication ….….……………...….……... 138 26 Count 16 ‘974 Remotely Locating and Commanding a Mobile Device ……………… 147 27 28 ii 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 2 ARGUMENT Page A. Nonjoinder Claims Are Factually Plausible ……………………….…...………...… 157 3 B. Plaintiffs’ Prior Disclosures Are Enablement ……………………….…………...… 159 4 C. Laches Don’t Apply …....……...………………………………………...…………. 163 5 D. Conception & Patent Inventorship …………………………………………………. 168 6 E. Reputational Injury Sufficient Alone for § 256 Correction .......................…………. 169 7 PRAYER FOR RELIEF ……………………….………………………………………..…… 172 8 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ………………………………………….……………...…… 173 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 iii 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST 1 TABLE OF EXHIBITS 2 Exhibit 1, Radar #6262545 detailing Find my iPhone invention dated October 1, 2008 ..…… 174 Exhibit 2, Email to Jeff Lemas discussing claims dated October 7, 2008 …………….……… 176 3 Exhibit 3, Email with Eddy Cue discussing claims dated January 27, 2009 …………………. 178 4 Exhibit 4, Email with Scott Forstall discussing claims dated February 18, 2009 ……….…..... 180 5 Exhibit 5, Email to Scott Forstall asking for patent protection dated March 8, 2009 ………… 182 6 Exhibit 6, Email to Apple PC asking for patent protection dated March 8, 2009 7 This exhibit’s under seal, as privileged communication. See ECF No. 19 8 Exhibit 7, Intellectual Property Agreement dated November 16, 2005 ………………………. 185 9 Exhibit 8, Plaintiff’s lab notebook dated August 28, 2008 ……………………..…………..… 187 Exhibit 9, Plaintiff’s lab notebook dated August 28, 2008 …………….………….………..… 189 10 Exhibit 10, Plaintiff’s lab notebook dated August 28, 2008 ………….…………….………… 191 11 Exhibit 11, Plaintiff’s lab notebook dated August 30, 2008 ……….………………….……… 193 12 Exhibit 12, Plaintiff’s lab notebook dated August 30, 2008 ……………….………….……… 195 13 Exhibit 13, Demand Letter propounded on Apple dated November 2, 2016 ………….…….... 197 14 Exhibit 14, Letter from HR Director promising investigation dated November 17, 2016 ...…. 203 15 Exhibit 15, Screenshot from plaintiff of cloud server performance dated February 5, 2008 …. 205 Exhibit 16, Plaintiff diagnosis of celebrity issue using cloud server dated February 15, 2008 . 207 16 Exhibit 17, Plaintiffs ticketing system notes written January 7, 2003 ………………...…….... 210 17 Exhibit 18, Plaintiffs ticketing system notes written January 7, 2003 ………………...…….... 212 18 Exhibit 19, Plaintiffs ticketing system notes written January 7, 2003 ………………...…….... 214 19 Exhibit 20, Plaintiffs ticketing system notes dated January 7, 2003 …………...……...…….... 216 20 Exhibit 21, Plaintiffs ticketing system notes written January 7, 2003 ………………...…….... 218 21 Exhibit 22, Milwaukee event where plaintiff lost iPhone dated August 23, 2008 ..…………... 220 22 Exhibit 23, Counsels email to GC Bruce Sewell with read receipts dated Nov. 14, 2016 …… 222 Exhibit 24, Eleven Electronic read receipts ………………………………………………..…. 225 23 Exhibit 25, Counsel email to plaintiff dated November 14, 2016 (six hours later) …………... 242 24 Exhibit 26, Plaintiffs previous Apple patent award, received a year tardy …………………… 244 25 26 27 28 iv 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2 CASES Page 3 A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Company 960 F.2d 1020, 1032-33 (Fed. Cir. 1992) …………………………………………..…….…… 163 4 Advanced Cardiovascular v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc. 5 988 F.2d 1161, 1163 (Fed. Cir. 1993) ..…………….………………………………………….. 163 6 Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc. 7 No. 3:17-CV-00108 (S.D. Cal 2019) …………….……………………………………………. 148 8 Ashcroft v. Iqbal 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) ………………………………………………………………………… 2 9 Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. 10 776 F.3d 837, 845 (Fed. Cir. 2015) ……………….………………………………………….... 166 11 Bayer AG v. Schein Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 12 301 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2002) …………………………………………………………...…… 150 13 Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) ….……………………………………………………………………... 2 14 15 Berry v. Webb 412 F.2d 261 (C.C.P.A. 1969) ………………………………………………………………… 6, 7 16 Brader v. Schaeffer 193 USPQ 627, 631 (1976) …………………………………………………. 2 17 Burroughs Wellcome Company v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. 18 40 F.3d 1223, 1227-28 (Fed. Cir. 1994) ……………………………………………………. 6, 166 19 Callicrate v. Wadsworth Manufacturing, Inc. 20 427 F.3d 1361, 77 USPQ2d 1041 (Fed. Cir. 2005) ………………………………………….... 160 21 Caterpillar Inc. v. Sturman Industries 22 387 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2004) ………………………………………………………………... 168 23 Coda Dev. S.R.O. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company No. 5:15-CV-1572 (N.D. Ohio 2016) …………………………………………………………. 163 24 Coleman v. Dines 25 754 F.2d 353, 224 (Fed. Cir. 1985) ………...……………………………………………..… 6, 167 26 Curtiss-Wright Flow Control Corporation v. Velan, Inc. 27 438 F.3d 1374, 1380 (Fed Cir. 2006) …………………………………………………………….. 3 28 v 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST 1 CASES (continued) Page Doe v. Hillsboro Independent School District 2 81 F.3d 1395, 1401 (5th Cir. 1996) ……………………………………………………………. 170 3 Ecolochem, Inc. v. Southern California Edison Company 4 227 F.3d 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2000) …………………….………………………………………..... 159 5 Eli Lilly & Company v. Aradigm Corporation 376 F.3d 1352, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2004) ………………..………………………………..………. 165 6 7 Ethicon Inc. v. United States Surgical Corporation 135 F.3d 1456, 1460-63 (Fed. Cir. 1998) ………………………….………………..… 5, 164, 165 8 Falana v. Kent State University 9 669 F.3d 1349, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2012) …………………………………………………………..... 5 10 Faryniarz v. Ramirez 11 No. 3:13-CV-01064-CSH (D. Conn 2015) ……….…………………………………………... 168 12 Filmtec Corporation v. Allied-Signal, Inc. 939 F.2d 1568 (Fed. Cir. 1991) ………………….……………………………………..………… 5 13 Fina Oil & Chemical Company v. Ewen 14 123 F.3d 1466, 1471 (Fed. Cir. 1997) ………………………………………………………….… 4 15 Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. Pillsbury Company 16 452 F.2d. 621, 625 (7th Cir. 1971) ……………………………………………………………… 50 17 General Electric Company v. Wilkins 750 F.3d 1324, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2014) ………………………………………….…………….... 167 18 19 Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Rehrig Pacific Company No. 1:11-CV-01273 (E.D. Cal. 2012) ……………………………………….………………….... 3 20 Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City 21 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966) ………………………………………………………………………. 159 22 Great Plains Trust Company v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter 23 313 F.3d 305, 312 (5th Cir. 2002) ……………………………………………………………... 158 24 Hess v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. 106 F.3d 976, 980 (Fed.Cir.1997) ……………………………………………………………..…. 4 25 26 High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation 5:11-cv-02509 LHK (N.D. Cal. 2015) ..………………………………………………………...... 2 27 Holmwood v. Sugavanam 28 948 F. 2d 1236 (Federal Circuit 1991) ………………………………………………………….... 6 vi 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST 1 CASES (continued) Page Hor v. Chu 2 No. 11-1540 (2012) ………………………………………………….………..……………….. 163 3 In re Angstadt 4 537 F.2d 498, 503 (C.C.P.A. 1976) ………………………………...…...……...…………...… 161 5 In re Brandstadter 484 F.2d 1395, 1406-07 (C.C.P.A. 1973) ………………………………………...…………… 163 6 7 In re DeBaun 687 F.2d 459, 462 (C.C.P.A. 1982) ………………………………………………………….... 164 8 In re Fisher 9 427 F.2d 833, 838 (C.C.P.A. 1970) ………………………………………..………………..… 163 10 In re Reuter 11 670 F.2d 1015 (C.C.P.A. 1981) …………………………………………………………….. 6, 169 12 In re VerHoef 888 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2018) ………………….………………………………… 164, 165 13 In re Wands 14 858 F.2d 736 (Fed. Cir. 1988) …………………………………………………………..... 160-163 15 Iowa State University Research Foundation v. Honeywell Inc. 16 444 F.2d 406 (4th Cir. 1971) …...……………………………………………………………….
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edgar Filing: APPLE INC - Form 8-K APPLE INC Form 8-K March 01, 2016
    Edgar Filing: APPLE INC - Form 8-K APPLE INC Form 8-K March 01, 2016 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 February 26, 2016 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) Apple Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) California 001-36743 94-2404110 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS. Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) 1 Infinite Loop Cupertino, California 95014 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (408) 996-1010 1 Edgar Filing: APPLE INC - Form 8-K (Registrants telephone number, including area code) Not applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the Registrant under any of the following provisions: ¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) 2 Edgar Filing: APPLE INC - Form 8-K Item 5.02Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. (e) The Board of Directors of Apple Inc. previously adopted, subject to shareholder approval, an amendment and restatement of Apples 2014 Employee Stock Plan (the 2014 Plan).
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Special Litigation Committee of the Board of Directors
    APPLE INC. REPORT OF THE SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD REGARDING DIRECTOR DEFENDANTS AND SETTLEMENT MAY 26, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 II. APPLE’S ENTRY INTO THE EBOOKS MARKET AND THE TRANSACTIONS THAT GAVE RISE TO THE ANTITRUST JUDGMENT ............... 3 A. Background Of The Ebook Industry ...................................................................... 3 B. Apple’s Negotiations With Publishers ................................................................... 4 C. The Launch Of The iPad And iBookstore ............................................................. 5 III. THE ANTITRUST TRIAL, JUDGMENT AND SETTLEMENT .................................... 7 A. Antitrust Judgment ................................................................................................. 7 B. Monetary Settlement .............................................................................................. 8 C. Appellate Proceedings ........................................................................................... 9 IV. THE DERIVATIVE ACTION .......................................................................................... 9 A. Procedural History ................................................................................................. 9 B. The Individual Defendants ................................................................................... 12 C. The Cause Of Action Against The Director
    [Show full text]
  • 13-0399 JBM Journal Special Issue Vol 19.Indd
    Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld 59 Steve Jobs’ Immortal Quest and the Heroic Persona Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld Yale University October 2011 was a month of historic milestones for Apple. At the end of the prior month, on Tuesday, September 27, Apple sent media invitations for a press event to be held October 4, 2011 at 10:00 am at the Cupertino Headquarters for a major announcement. Several prominent industry analysts proclaimed with hopeful optimism that the firm would announce the return of Apple founder Steve Jobs. Sadly, Steve Jobs did not appear for what turned out to be a product announcement of the iPhone 4S. In fact, Jobs had stepped down as CEO on January 17, 2011, a year and a half after returning from medical leave. He stated that Tim Cook, Apple’s Chief Operating Officer, would run day-to-day operations as he had previously done during Jobs’ 2009 medical leave. The analysts’ wishful thinking had some basis in more than cult like denial of Steve Jobs’ mortality. In fact, despite that medical leave, Jobs had returned for the iPad 2 launch on March 2 and the iCloud introduction on June 6. The analysts were among many constituents around the world who were to be tragically disappointed. Jobs actually had resigned as CEO on August 22, 2011 saying, “I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple’s CEO, I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately, that day has come” (Isaacson, 2011). Six weeks later, a day after the new iPhone press conference, he died (Isaacson, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Where Have All the Processors Gone?
    The Synergist: How to Lead Your Team to Predictable Success Case Study: Where Have All The Processors Gone? It’s hard to find a good, single, stand alone case study for a Processor. It’s not that they are less common than Visionaries or Operators. It’s just that by the very nature of who they are, they eschew the limelight. They prefer to work behind the scenes making sure the systems and processes are in place to allow good organizations to become great organizations. They care little about seeking public praise or adulation. You don’t often see a Processor striding up and down the stage at the annual company retreat, representing the business at a charity event or giving interviews to the local news station. Instead you’ll be more likely to find them making sure that what the company does today is repeatable, consistent and scalable tomorrow and into the future. In many ways they are the unsung hero of our three natural styles. That’s not to say there aren’t examples of them out in the wild. And it’s not to say that at times we wouldn’t want a Processor in charge. We shouldn’t conflate the cult of the Visionary or the get it done mentality of the Operator with good leadership. Yes, quite often, particularly during the early stages of a company’s growth we need a good V or O in charge. But there are occasions when we need the structured, methodical thinking of a P to put in place the systems and processes needed to stable the ship and get us sailing in the right direction again.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets at Apple's Core [Entire Talk]
    Stanford eCorner Secrets at Apple's Core [Entire Talk] Adam Lashinsky, Author May 23, 2012 Video URL: http://ecorner.stanford.edu/videos/2973/Secrets-at-Apples-Core-Entire-Talk Adam Lashinsky, Fortune senior editor-at-large, shares an insider look at Apple, one of the world's most iconic and secretive companies. Based on his research into the technology giant's internal processes and approaches to leadership and building products, Lashinsky offers insights and surprises from his book, Inside Apple: How America's Most Admired--and Secretive-- Company Really Works. Transcript Almost exactly a year-ago this week I published an article in Fortune magazine with the same title as you see in front of you, Inside Apple. We decided at Fortune that in Apple we had a company that the entire world thought they knew a lot about because the world knew about Apple's products. And they knew about Apple's advertising and its image and its brand and its logo and so on. When in fact the world knew and really still does know very little about how Apple does what it does, what goes on inside Apple? There is a reason for that and it's a major part of my thesis and what I've learned in researching this company intensely over the last year and that is that Apple doesn't want us to know what goes on inside Apple. Apple is professionally focused on telling us, telling you about its products. Not about it. As a business journalist, my job is not to be concerned with what Apple is interested in us knowing, but what my readers at Fortune magazine ought to know and want to know.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hybrid Tablet Temptation by Jean-Louis Gassée
    The Hybrid Tablet Temptation by Jean-Louis Gassée In no small part, the iPad's success comes from its uncompromising Do Less To Do More philosophy. Now a reasonably mature product, can the iPad expand its uses without falling into the hybrid PC/tablet trap? When the iPad came out, almost four years ago, it was immediately misunderstood by industry insiders - and joyously embraced by normal humans. Just Google iPad naysayer for a few nuggets of iPad negativism. Even Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, couldn't avoid the derivative trap: He saw the new object as a mere evolution of an existing one and shrugged off the iPad as a bigger phone. Schmidt should have known better, he had been an Apple director in the days when Jobs believed the two companies were "natural allies". I was no wiser. I got my first iPad on launch day and was immediately disappointed. My new tablet wouldn't let me do the what I did on my MacBook Air - or my tiny EeePC running Windows Xp (not Vista!). For example, writing a Monday Note on an iPad was a practical impossibility - and still is. I fully accept the personal nature of this view and, further, I don't buy the media consumption vs. productivity dichotomy Microsoft and its shills (Gartner et al.) tried to foist on us. If by productivity we mean work, work product, earning one's living, tablets in general and the iPad in particular have more than made the case for their being productivity tools as well as education and entertainment devices.
    [Show full text]
  • <PAGE> UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
    <PAGE> UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM N-PX ANNUAL REPORT OF PROXY VOTING RECORD OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT FILE NUMBER: 811-05032 NAME OF REGISTRANT: Baron Investment Funds Trust ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 767 Fifth Avenue, 49th Floor New York, NY 10153 NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENT FOR SERVICE: Patrick M. Patalino, General Counsel c/o Baron Investment Funds Trust 767 Fifth Avenue, 49th Floor New York, NY 10153 REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER: 212-583-2000 DATE OF FISCAL YEAR END: 09/30 Reporting Period: 07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 <PAGE> ******************************* FORM N-Px REPORT ******************************* ICA File Number: 811-05032 Reporting Period: 07/01/2017 - 06/30/2018 Baron Investments Funds Trust =============================== BARON ASSET FUND =============================== A. O. SMITH CORPORATION Ticker: AOS Security ID: 831865209 Meeting Date: APR 09, 2018 Meeting Type: Annual Record Date: FEB 20, 2018 # Proposal Mgt Rec Vote Cast Sponsor 1.1 Elect Director William P. Greubel For For Management 1.2 Elect Director Ilham Kadri For For Management 1.3 Elect Director Idelle K. Wolf For For Management 1.4 Elect Director Gene C. Wulf For For Management 2 Advisory Vote to Ratify Named For Against Management Executive Officers’ Compensation 3 Ratify Ernst & Young LLP as Auditors For For Management -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALEXANDER’S, INC. Ticker: ALX Security ID: 014752109 Meeting Date: MAY 17, 2018 Meeting Type: Annual Record Date: MAR 19, 2018 # Proposal Mgt Rec Vote Cast Sponsor 1.1 Elect Director David M. Mandelbaum For For Management 1.2 Elect Director Arthur I. Sonnenblick For For Management 1.3 Elect Director Richard R.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Expected to Reveal New Ipad 7 March 2012, by Glenn Chapman
    Apple expected to reveal new iPad 7 March 2012, by Glenn Chapman software available on the iPad. Siri has been a hit on the iPhone 4S. Apple may introduce a version of the iPad with a smaller screen and lower price to fend off competition from Amazon's Kindle Fire and the Nook from book-seller Barnes & Noble, according to independent Silicon Valley analyst Rod Enderle. An Apple TV announcement could also be in store, given that it has been a while since the company has upgraded its offering in an Internet television The Apple logo at the entrance of Yerba Buena Center market being heated up by offerings from Google for Arts in San Francisco on March 6, 2012. Apple is and makers of major videogame consoles. expected to reveal a new version of its coveted iPad on Wednesday in its first major media event since the death of legendary founder and beloved pitchman Steve Jobs. Apple is expected to reveal a new version of its coveted iPad on Wednesday in its first major media event since the death of legendary founder and beloved pitchman Steve Jobs. In typical Apple style, the California-based company has offered the scantest of hints as to what it will unveil on the stage of the Yerba Buena An iPad2 on display at the Apple store on March 6, 2012 Center for the Arts in San Francisco, igniting a in San Francisco, California. Apple is expected to reveal wildfire of rumor in the online technology world. a new version of its coveted iPad on Wednesday in its first major media event since the death of legendary A picture on press invitations, and Apple's usual founder and beloved pitchman Steve Jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Transcript
    Sue Nelson Hello, I'm Sue Nelson and welcome to the Create the Future podcast brought to you by the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering. [Music] Ken Kocienda invented the autocorrect for the original iPhone and was part of the team that created Apple's Safari browser. He's worked on all manner of products during his 15 years as an engineer for Apple, including the iPad, the Apple Watch, and the iPhone, most famously enabling a virtual keyboard on a phone screen. Ken is also the author of the book ‘Creative Selection Inside Apple's Design Process During the Golden Age of Steve Jobs’, a man whose name will definitely crop up during our conversation. More recently, Ken became the product architect of a company called Humane. And that's all a little bit hush hush at the moment, as we'll hear later, but let's start with that job description, Product Architect, which, to be honest, sounded a little bit like something from The Matrix. Ken Kocienda A Product Architect in the context of the company that I'm working at now, is a job where we think about what the product will do for people. What's it for? So much of the work that I've done over the course of my career has been based in software, but the software interfaces into hardware, it has an environment that it's running in. So, there's this technical aspect to it. But ultimately, what we're trying to do is serve people out in the world who are maybe going to be interested in bringing a new technology product into their life.
    [Show full text]
  • Pengaruh Utilitarian Benefit Dan Hedonic Benefit Terhadap Brand Loyalty Melalui Brand Experience Dan Satisfaction
    PENGARUH UTILITARIAN BENEFIT DAN HEDONIC BENEFIT TERHADAP BRAND LOYALTY MELALUI BRAND EXPERIENCE DAN SATISFACTION : (SUATU TELAAH TERHADAP PRODUK IPAD DI JAKARTA) Oleh: Machreza Ibrahim Siregar 200911042 SKRIPSI Diajukan Untuk Melengkapi Sebagian Syarat Guna Mencapai Gelar Sarjana Ekonomi Program Studi Manajemen SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU EKONOMI INDONESIA BANKING SCHOOL JAKARTA 2013 Pengaruh Utilitarian..., Machreza Ibrahim Siregar, Ma.-Ibs, 2013 Pengaruh Utilitarian..., Machreza Ibrahim Siregar, Ma.-Ibs, 2013 PENGARUH UTILITARIAN BENEFIT DAN HEDONIC BENEFIT TERHADAP BRAND LOYALTY MELALUI BRAND EXPERIENCE DAN SATISFACTION : (SUATU TELAAH TERHADAP PRODUK IPAD DI JAKARTA) Oleh: Machreza Ibrahim Siregar 200911042 Diterima dan disetujui untuk diajukan dalam ujian komprehensif Jakarta, 26 September 2013 Dosen Pembimbing Whony Rofianto, ST., Msi. i Pengaruh Utilitarian..., Machreza Ibrahim Siregar, Ma.-Ibs, 2013 LEMBAR PERSETUJUAN UJI KOMPREHENSIF Nama : Machreza Ibrahim Siregar NIM : 200911042 Judul Skripsi : Pengaruh utilitarian benefit dan hedonic benefit terhadap brand loyalty melalui brand experience dan satisfaction : (suatu telaah terhadap produk iPad di Jakarta) Tanggal Ujian Komprehensif : Nama Penguji : Ketua : Paulina Harun.Dr.,SE.,M.Si Anggota : Whony Rofianto.ST., M.Si : Fajar Hertingkir.S.Sos,MM Dengan ini menyatakan bahwa mahasiswa yang dimaksud di atas telah mengikuti ujian komprehensif pada: Hari/Tanggal : 26 September 2013 Dengan Hasil : B+ Ketua Penguji, Paulina Harun.Dr.,SE.,M.Si Anggota 1, Anggota 2, Whony Rofiant.ST.,M.Si Fajar
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan University Sues Apple Over Iphone Patents 30 July 2012
    Taiwan university sues Apple over iPhone patents 30 July 2012 comment. Earlier this month, Chinese technology firm Shanghai Zhizhen Network Technology Co Ltd filed a similar claim against Apple over Siri. The company's Xiao i Robot software, patented in 2004, operates in a similar way to Apple's personal assistant and works on the iOS and Android operating systems. Greater China -- which includes Hong Kong and Taiwan -- has become Apple's fastest-growing Apple's Senior Vice President of iOS Scott Forstall region, with revenues second only to the United speaks about the iPhone voice recognition app Siri in States. California in 2011. Taiwan's National Cheng Kung University has filed a suit against US tech giant Apple, (c) 2012 AFP claiming the company's Siri intelligent assistant has infringed on two of its patents. Taiwan's National Cheng Kung University has filed a suit against US tech giant Apple, claiming the company's Siri intelligent assistant has infringed on two of its patents. Apple introduced the voice-activated assistant technology when launching the iPhone 4S in 2011. But Cheng Kung University in south Taiwan's Tainan city said the technology infringes two patents held by one of its research teams, both related to speech recognition. The team is led by Wang Jhing-fa, a professor who specialises in chip designs and neural networks facilitating speech and pattern recognition. "We filed a lawsuit against Apple at a Federal district court in Texas Friday," Yama Chen, a legal affairs manager at the university, told AFP. Apple Taiwan was not immediately available for 1 / 2 APA citation: Taiwan university sues Apple over iPhone patents (2012, July 30) retrieved 2 October 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2012-07-taiwan-university-sues-apple-iphone.html This document is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted Version of Document Sought to Be Sealed
    Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 777-3 Filed 05/28/21 Page 1 of 644 REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED 1 CHRISTINE A. VARNEY (pro hac vice) [email protected] 2 KATHERINE B. FORREST (pro hac vice) [email protected] 3 GARY A. BORNSTEIN (pro hac vice) [email protected] 4 YONATAN EVEN (pro hac vice) [email protected] 5 J. WESLEY EARNHARDT (pro hac vice) [email protected] 6 LAUREN A. MOSKOWITZ (pro hac vice) [email protected] 7 JUSTIN C. CLARKE (pro hac vice) [email protected] 8 M. BRENT BYARS (pro hac vice) [email protected] 9 CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 825 Eighth Avenue 10 New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 474-1000 11 Facsimile: (212) 474-3700 12 PAUL J. RIEHLE (SBN 115199) [email protected] 13 FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP Four Embarcadero Center 14 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 15 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant 17 Epic Games, Inc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 OAKLAND DIVISION 21 EPIC GAMES, INC., Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH 22 Plaintiff, Counter-defendant, 23 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 24 v. PROPOSED BY EPIC GAMES, INC. 25 APPLE INC., The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 26 Defendant, Counterclaimant. Trial: May 3, 2021 27 28 Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 777-3 Filed 05/28/21 Page 2 of 644 1 Epic Games, Inc. respectfully proposes the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of 2 Law submitted herewith.
    [Show full text]