DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hybrid Tablet Temptation by Jean-Louis Gassée

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Hybrid Tablet Temptation by Jean-Louis Gassée The Hybrid Tablet Temptation by Jean-Louis Gassée In no small part, the iPad's success comes from its uncompromising Do Less To Do More philosophy. Now a reasonably mature product, can the iPad expand its uses without falling into the hybrid PC/tablet trap? When the iPad came out, almost four years ago, it was immediately misunderstood by industry insiders - and joyously embraced by normal humans. Just Google iPad naysayer for a few nuggets of iPad negativism. Even Google's CEO, Eric Schmidt, couldn't avoid the derivative trap: He saw the new object as a mere evolution of an existing one and shrugged off the iPad as a bigger phone. Schmidt should have known better, he had been an Apple director in the days when Jobs believed the two companies were "natural allies". I was no wiser. I got my first iPad on launch day and was immediately disappointed. My new tablet wouldn't let me do the what I did on my MacBook Air - or my tiny EeePC running Windows Xp (not Vista!). For example, writing a Monday Note on an iPad was a practical impossibility - and still is. I fully accept the personal nature of this view and, further, I don't buy the media consumption vs. productivity dichotomy Microsoft and its shills (Gartner et al.) tried to foist on us. If by productivity we mean work, work product, earning one's living, tablets in general and the iPad in particular have more than made the case for their being productivity tools as well as education and entertainment devices. Still, preparing a mixed media document, even a moderately complex one, irresistibly throws most users back to a conventional PC or laptop. With multiple windows and folders, the PC lets us accumulate text, web pages, spreadsheets and graphics to be distilled, cut and pasted into the intended document. Microsoft now comes to the rescue. Their hybrid Surface PC/Tablet lets you "consume" media, play games in purely tablet mode - and switch to the comfortable laptop facilities offered by Windows 8. The iPad constricts you to ersatz folders, preventing you to put your document's building blocks in one place? No problem, the Surface device features a conventional desktop User Interface, familiar folders, comfy Office apps as well as a "modern" tile-based Touch UI. The best of both worlds, skillfully promoted in TV ads promising work and fun rolled into one device. What's not to like? John Kirk, a self-described "recovering attorney", whose tightly argued and fun columns are always worth reading, has answers. In a post on Tablets Metaphysics - unfortunately behind a paywall - he focuses on the Aristotelian differences between tablets and laptops. Having paid my due$$ to the Techpinions site, I will quote Kirk's summation [emphasis mine]: Touch is ACCIDENTAL to a Notebook computer. It's plastic surgery. It may enhance the usefulness of a Notebook but it doesn't change the essence of what a Notebook computer is. A keyboard is ACCIDENTAL to a Tablet. It's plastic surgery. It may enhance the usefulness of a Tablet, but it doesn't change the essence of what a Tablet is. Further — and this is key — a touch input metaphor and a pixel input metaphor must be wholly different and wholly incompatible with one another. It's not just that they do not comfortably co-exist within one form factor. It's also that they do not comfortably co-exist within our minds eye. In plain words, it's no accident that tablets and notebooks are distinctly different from one another. On the contrary, their differences — their incompatibilities — are the essence of what makes them what they are. Microsoft, deeply set in the culture of backwards compatibility that served it so well for so long did the usual thing, it added a tablet layer on top of Windows 7. The result didn't take the market by storm and appears to have caused the exit of Steve Sinofsky, the Windows czar now happily ensconced at Harvard Business School and a Board Partner with the Andreessen Horowitz venture firm. Many think the $900M Surface RT write-off also contributed to Ballmer's August 2013 resignation. Now equipped with hindsight, Apple's decision to stick to a "pure" tablet looks more inspired than lucky. If we remember that a tablet project preceded the iPhone, only to be set aside for a while, Apple's "stubborn minimalism", its refusal to hybridize the iPad might be seen as the result of long experimentation - with more than a dash of Steve Jobs (and Scott Forstall) inflexibility. Apple's bet can be summed up thus: MacBooks and iPads have their respective best use cases, they both reap high customer satisfaction scores. Why ruin a good game? Critics might add: Why sell one device when we can sell two? Apple would rather "force" us to buy two devices in order to maximize revenue. On this, Tim Cook often reminds Wall Street of Apple's preference for self-cannibalization, for letting its new and less expensive products displace existing ones. Indeed, the iPad keeps cannibalizing laptops, PCs and Macs alike. All this leaves one question unanswered: Is that it? Will the iPad fundamentals stay the way they have been from day one? Are we going to be thrown back to our notebooks when composing the moderately complex mixed-media documents I earlier referred to? Or will the iPad hardware/software combination become more adept at such uses? To start, we can eliminate a mixed-mode iOS/Mac device. Flip a switch, it's an iPad, flip it again, add a keyboard/touchpad and you have a Mac. No contraption allowed. We know where to turn to for that. Next, a new iOS version allows multiple windows to appear on the iPad screen; folders are no longer separately attached to each app as they are today but lets us store documents from multiple apps in one place. Add a blinking cursor for text and you have... a Mac, or something too close to a Mac but still different. Precisely the reason why that won't work. (This might pose the question of an A7 or A8 processor replacing the Intel chip inside a MacBook Air. It can be done - a "mere matter of software" - but how much would it cut from the manufacturing cost? $30 to $50 perhaps. Nice but not game-changing, a question for another Monday Note.) More modest, evolutionary changes might still be welcome. Earlier this year, Counternotions proposed a slotted clipboard as An interim solution for iOS 'multitasking': [...] until Apple has a more general solution to multitasking and inter-app navigation, the four-slot clipboard with a visible UI should be announced at WWDC. I believe it would buy Ive another year for a more comprehensive architectural solution, as he'll likely need it. This year's WWDC came and went with the strongest iOS update so far, but no general nor interim solution to the multitasking and inter-app navigation discussed in the post. (Besides the Counternotions blog, this erudite and enigmatic author also edits counternotions.tumblr.com and can be followed on Twitter as @Kontra.) A version of the above suggestion could be conceptualized as a floating dropbox to be invoked when needed, hovering above the document worked on. This would not require the recreation of a PC-like windows and desktop UI. Needed components could be extracted from the floating store, dragged and dropped on the work in process. We'll have to wait and see if and how Apple evolves the iPad without falling into the hybrid trap. On even more speculative ground, a recent iPad Air intro video offered a quick glimpse of the Pencil stylus by Fifty-Three, the creators of the well-regarded Paper iPad app. So far, styli haven't done well on the iPad. Apple only stocks children-oriented devices from Disney and Marvel. Nothing else, in spite of the abundance of such devices offered on Amazon. Perhaps we'll someday see Apple grant Bill Gates his wish, as recounted by Jobs' biographer Walter Isaacson: "I've been predicting a tablet with a stylus for many years," he told me. "I will eventually turn out to be right or be dead." Someday, we might see an iPad, larger or not, Pro or not, featuring a screen with more degrees of pressure sensitivity. After seeing David Hockney's work on iPads at San Francisco's de Young museum, my hopes are high. -- [email protected] @gassee .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 13-0399 JBM Journal Special Issue Vol 19.Indd
    Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld 59 Steve Jobs’ Immortal Quest and the Heroic Persona Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld Yale University October 2011 was a month of historic milestones for Apple. At the end of the prior month, on Tuesday, September 27, Apple sent media invitations for a press event to be held October 4, 2011 at 10:00 am at the Cupertino Headquarters for a major announcement. Several prominent industry analysts proclaimed with hopeful optimism that the firm would announce the return of Apple founder Steve Jobs. Sadly, Steve Jobs did not appear for what turned out to be a product announcement of the iPhone 4S. In fact, Jobs had stepped down as CEO on January 17, 2011, a year and a half after returning from medical leave. He stated that Tim Cook, Apple’s Chief Operating Officer, would run day-to-day operations as he had previously done during Jobs’ 2009 medical leave. The analysts’ wishful thinking had some basis in more than cult like denial of Steve Jobs’ mortality. In fact, despite that medical leave, Jobs had returned for the iPad 2 launch on March 2 and the iCloud introduction on June 6. The analysts were among many constituents around the world who were to be tragically disappointed. Jobs actually had resigned as CEO on August 22, 2011 saying, “I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple’s CEO, I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately, that day has come” (Isaacson, 2011). Six weeks later, a day after the new iPhone press conference, he died (Isaacson, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Where Have All the Processors Gone?
    The Synergist: How to Lead Your Team to Predictable Success Case Study: Where Have All The Processors Gone? It’s hard to find a good, single, stand alone case study for a Processor. It’s not that they are less common than Visionaries or Operators. It’s just that by the very nature of who they are, they eschew the limelight. They prefer to work behind the scenes making sure the systems and processes are in place to allow good organizations to become great organizations. They care little about seeking public praise or adulation. You don’t often see a Processor striding up and down the stage at the annual company retreat, representing the business at a charity event or giving interviews to the local news station. Instead you’ll be more likely to find them making sure that what the company does today is repeatable, consistent and scalable tomorrow and into the future. In many ways they are the unsung hero of our three natural styles. That’s not to say there aren’t examples of them out in the wild. And it’s not to say that at times we wouldn’t want a Processor in charge. We shouldn’t conflate the cult of the Visionary or the get it done mentality of the Operator with good leadership. Yes, quite often, particularly during the early stages of a company’s growth we need a good V or O in charge. But there are occasions when we need the structured, methodical thinking of a P to put in place the systems and processes needed to stable the ship and get us sailing in the right direction again.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets at Apple's Core [Entire Talk]
    Stanford eCorner Secrets at Apple's Core [Entire Talk] Adam Lashinsky, Author May 23, 2012 Video URL: http://ecorner.stanford.edu/videos/2973/Secrets-at-Apples-Core-Entire-Talk Adam Lashinsky, Fortune senior editor-at-large, shares an insider look at Apple, one of the world's most iconic and secretive companies. Based on his research into the technology giant's internal processes and approaches to leadership and building products, Lashinsky offers insights and surprises from his book, Inside Apple: How America's Most Admired--and Secretive-- Company Really Works. Transcript Almost exactly a year-ago this week I published an article in Fortune magazine with the same title as you see in front of you, Inside Apple. We decided at Fortune that in Apple we had a company that the entire world thought they knew a lot about because the world knew about Apple's products. And they knew about Apple's advertising and its image and its brand and its logo and so on. When in fact the world knew and really still does know very little about how Apple does what it does, what goes on inside Apple? There is a reason for that and it's a major part of my thesis and what I've learned in researching this company intensely over the last year and that is that Apple doesn't want us to know what goes on inside Apple. Apple is professionally focused on telling us, telling you about its products. Not about it. As a business journalist, my job is not to be concerned with what Apple is interested in us knowing, but what my readers at Fortune magazine ought to know and want to know.
    [Show full text]
  • Apple Expected to Reveal New Ipad 7 March 2012, by Glenn Chapman
    Apple expected to reveal new iPad 7 March 2012, by Glenn Chapman software available on the iPad. Siri has been a hit on the iPhone 4S. Apple may introduce a version of the iPad with a smaller screen and lower price to fend off competition from Amazon's Kindle Fire and the Nook from book-seller Barnes & Noble, according to independent Silicon Valley analyst Rod Enderle. An Apple TV announcement could also be in store, given that it has been a while since the company has upgraded its offering in an Internet television The Apple logo at the entrance of Yerba Buena Center market being heated up by offerings from Google for Arts in San Francisco on March 6, 2012. Apple is and makers of major videogame consoles. expected to reveal a new version of its coveted iPad on Wednesday in its first major media event since the death of legendary founder and beloved pitchman Steve Jobs. Apple is expected to reveal a new version of its coveted iPad on Wednesday in its first major media event since the death of legendary founder and beloved pitchman Steve Jobs. In typical Apple style, the California-based company has offered the scantest of hints as to what it will unveil on the stage of the Yerba Buena An iPad2 on display at the Apple store on March 6, 2012 Center for the Arts in San Francisco, igniting a in San Francisco, California. Apple is expected to reveal wildfire of rumor in the online technology world. a new version of its coveted iPad on Wednesday in its first major media event since the death of legendary A picture on press invitations, and Apple's usual founder and beloved pitchman Steve Jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Transcript
    Sue Nelson Hello, I'm Sue Nelson and welcome to the Create the Future podcast brought to you by the Queen Elizabeth Prize for Engineering. [Music] Ken Kocienda invented the autocorrect for the original iPhone and was part of the team that created Apple's Safari browser. He's worked on all manner of products during his 15 years as an engineer for Apple, including the iPad, the Apple Watch, and the iPhone, most famously enabling a virtual keyboard on a phone screen. Ken is also the author of the book ‘Creative Selection Inside Apple's Design Process During the Golden Age of Steve Jobs’, a man whose name will definitely crop up during our conversation. More recently, Ken became the product architect of a company called Humane. And that's all a little bit hush hush at the moment, as we'll hear later, but let's start with that job description, Product Architect, which, to be honest, sounded a little bit like something from The Matrix. Ken Kocienda A Product Architect in the context of the company that I'm working at now, is a job where we think about what the product will do for people. What's it for? So much of the work that I've done over the course of my career has been based in software, but the software interfaces into hardware, it has an environment that it's running in. So, there's this technical aspect to it. But ultimately, what we're trying to do is serve people out in the world who are maybe going to be interested in bringing a new technology product into their life.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwan University Sues Apple Over Iphone Patents 30 July 2012
    Taiwan university sues Apple over iPhone patents 30 July 2012 comment. Earlier this month, Chinese technology firm Shanghai Zhizhen Network Technology Co Ltd filed a similar claim against Apple over Siri. The company's Xiao i Robot software, patented in 2004, operates in a similar way to Apple's personal assistant and works on the iOS and Android operating systems. Greater China -- which includes Hong Kong and Taiwan -- has become Apple's fastest-growing Apple's Senior Vice President of iOS Scott Forstall region, with revenues second only to the United speaks about the iPhone voice recognition app Siri in States. California in 2011. Taiwan's National Cheng Kung University has filed a suit against US tech giant Apple, (c) 2012 AFP claiming the company's Siri intelligent assistant has infringed on two of its patents. Taiwan's National Cheng Kung University has filed a suit against US tech giant Apple, claiming the company's Siri intelligent assistant has infringed on two of its patents. Apple introduced the voice-activated assistant technology when launching the iPhone 4S in 2011. But Cheng Kung University in south Taiwan's Tainan city said the technology infringes two patents held by one of its research teams, both related to speech recognition. The team is led by Wang Jhing-fa, a professor who specialises in chip designs and neural networks facilitating speech and pattern recognition. "We filed a lawsuit against Apple at a Federal district court in Texas Friday," Yama Chen, a legal affairs manager at the university, told AFP. Apple Taiwan was not immediately available for 1 / 2 APA citation: Taiwan university sues Apple over iPhone patents (2012, July 30) retrieved 2 October 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2012-07-taiwan-university-sues-apple-iphone.html This document is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted Version of Document Sought to Be Sealed
    Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 777-3 Filed 05/28/21 Page 1 of 644 REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED 1 CHRISTINE A. VARNEY (pro hac vice) [email protected] 2 KATHERINE B. FORREST (pro hac vice) [email protected] 3 GARY A. BORNSTEIN (pro hac vice) [email protected] 4 YONATAN EVEN (pro hac vice) [email protected] 5 J. WESLEY EARNHARDT (pro hac vice) [email protected] 6 LAUREN A. MOSKOWITZ (pro hac vice) [email protected] 7 JUSTIN C. CLARKE (pro hac vice) [email protected] 8 M. BRENT BYARS (pro hac vice) [email protected] 9 CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 825 Eighth Avenue 10 New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 474-1000 11 Facsimile: (212) 474-3700 12 PAUL J. RIEHLE (SBN 115199) [email protected] 13 FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP Four Embarcadero Center 14 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 15 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant 17 Epic Games, Inc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 OAKLAND DIVISION 21 EPIC GAMES, INC., Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH 22 Plaintiff, Counter-defendant, 23 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 24 v. PROPOSED BY EPIC GAMES, INC. 25 APPLE INC., The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers 26 Defendant, Counterclaimant. Trial: May 3, 2021 27 28 Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 777-3 Filed 05/28/21 Page 2 of 644 1 Epic Games, Inc. respectfully proposes the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of 2 Law submitted herewith.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST I DARREN EASTMAN 21446 Oneda Co
    1 DARREN EASTMAN 21446 Oneda Court 2 Los Gatos, CA 95033 3 [email protected] Pro Se 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OAKLAND 8 9 DARREN EASTMAN, Case No. 4:18-CV-05929-JST 10 Plaintiff, FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 12 APPLE, INC., Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar 13 Defendant. Courtroom: 6 14 15 Action Filed: 8/13/2018 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 i 4AC 4:18-CV-05929-JST 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page INTRODUCTION …………………………………...…………………….................................. 1 3 4 LEGAL STANDARD 5 A. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) …………………………………………….. 2 6 C. Correction of Ownership and § 256 …………...…………………………….………... 4 7 8 FACTUAL BACKGROUND OF INVENTIONS 9 A. Phone-finding Patents …...………………………………………………………...….. 7 B. Passbook …...………………………………………………………………………… 16 10 11 CAUSES OF ACTION 12 A. PATENT NONJOINDER 13 Count 1 ‘367 Remotely Locating and Commanding a Mobile Device ……..….…...….. 22 14 Count 2 ‘310 System & Method for Remotely Initiating Lost Mode on Device ………. 32 15 Count 3 ‘896 Remotely Initiating Lost Mode on a Computing Device ……………....... 45 Count 4 ‘32 Device Locator Disable Authentication ….….…………….....…….……... 59 16 Count 5 ‘98 Bypassing Security Authentication on a Lost Device to Return to Owner .. 65 17 Count 6 ‘776 Remotely Locating and Commanding a Mobile Device ...……...……..… 71 18 Count 7 ‘530 Remotely Receiving and Communicating Commands to Mobile Device . 77 19 Count 8 ‘14 Location-Based Ticket Books ….…....…..…...…….....…………………... 92 20 Count 9 ’495 Location-Based Ticket Books ….…....…..…...…...………..…………... 108 21 Count 10 ‘513 System and Method for Providing Electronic Event Tickets ………….
    [Show full text]
  • The Iphone Apps
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 The iPhone Apps. A Digital Culture of Interactivity Flückiger, Barbara Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-70852 Book Section Published Version Originally published at: Flückiger, Barbara (2012). The iPhone Apps. A Digital Culture of Interactivity. In: Snickars, Pelle; Vonderau, Patrick. Moving Data: The iPhone and the Future of Media. New York: Columbia Universtiy Press, 171-183. CHAPTER 11 The iPhone Apps A Digital Culture of Interactivity BARBARA FLUECKIGER ATRICK COLLISON, who in his own words is a “hacker, pilot, student P at MIT, cofounder of Auctomatic,” and “lover of waffl es,” certainly can be seen as prototypical of certain fi rst-generation developers of iPhone apps—the whiz kids. 1 Self-taught, he started to program software at an early age. When Patrick was seventeen, he founded his own company, Auctomatic, with his younger brother John and sold it two years later for an exorbitant sum to the Canadian company Live Current Media. During the winter of 2007 he programmed the iPhone app Encyclopedia, an offl ine version of Wikipedia that allows almost all of Wikipedia’s online functions, including the use of links between different entries and in 2010 was offered in eighty- three languages, including Chinese, Hindi, and Vietnamese. In a broad sense, Patrick Collison is an example of a “digital native.” But he is more than that, given that “digital natives” need not, by defi nition, be creative in developing tools; they need only be highly literate in exploiting predefi ned structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 4:20-Cv-05640-YGR Document 407 Filed 04/08/21 Page 1 of 365
    Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 407 Filed 04/08/21 Page 1 of 365 REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENT SOUGHT TO BE SEALED 1 CHRISTINE A. VARNEY (pro hac vice) 2 [email protected] KATHERINE B. FORREST (pro hac vice) 3 [email protected] GARY A. BORNSTEIN (pro hac vice) 4 [email protected] YONATAN EVEN (pro hac vice) 5 [email protected] LAUREN A. MOSKOWITZ (pro hac vice) 6 [email protected] JUSTIN C. CLARKE (pro hac vice) 7 [email protected] M. BRENT BYARS (pro hac vice) 8 [email protected] CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP 9 825 Eighth Avenue New York, New York 10019 10 Telephone: (212) 474-1000 Facsimile: (212) 474-3700 11 PAUL J. RIEHLE (SBN 115199) 12 [email protected] FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 13 Four Embarcadero Center 27th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 14 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant 16 Epic Games, Inc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 OAKLAND DIVISION 20 21 EPIC GAMES, INC., Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH 22 Plaintiff, Counter-defendant, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 23 PROPOSED BY EPIC GAMES, INC. v. 24 APPLE INC., 25 The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Defendant, Counterclaimant. 26 Trial: May 3, 2021 27 28 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PROPOSED BY EPIC GAMES, INC. Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 407 Filed 04/08/21 Page 2 of 365 1 Epic Games, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • From Financial Aid to Philanthropy Thestanfordchallenge
    Summer 2011 Paying It Forward: From Financial Aid to Philanthropy BY MAGGIE DIAMOND ABOVE: Before they became donors: Scholarships helped Molly Brown Forstall and Scott Forstall—high school sweethearts from Bremerton, Washington—graduate from Stanford in 1991. PHOTOS: Courtesy of the Forstalls Since it was first established in 1959, the Launcelot J. Gamble Scholarship has helped more than 100 students get a Stanford education. One of those students was Molly Brown Forstall, ’91, JD ’94. “I absolutely could not have come to Stanford without the scholarship assistance,” says Molly. Both she and her husband Scott Forstall, ’91, MS ’92, received need-based financial aid during their time on the Farm. Partly for that reason, they found themselves in a position to “pay it forward” by creating two new scholarship funds for undergraduates. After graduation from Stanford Law School, Molly took a prestigious federal clerkship and later joined Cooley Godward, a Silicon Valley law firm with strong ties to Stanford. Scott joined computer maker NeXT and subsequently followed its founder, Steve Jobs, when the latter returned to Apple. There, Scott became the chief architect of the Macintosh OS X operating system, which helped propel Apple’s comeback. His next project? Developing the wildly successful iPhone. Today, Scott leads the team responsible for the software that powers the iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch. Molly, after practicing employment law for several years, now enjoys her full-time role as a mother of two. When the Forstalls started thinking seriously about philanthropy, Stanford was one of the first institutions they considered. “Realistically, a family that makes $100,000 a year can’t spend $50,000 of that on Stanford,” says Molly.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.13 Ios Developer Documentation 31 1.14 Wrap-Up 32
    DIVE INTO® IOS 6 AN APP-DRIVEN APPROACH DEITEL® DEVELOPER SERIES Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals. The authors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this book, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. The publisher offers excellent discounts on this book when ordered in quantity for bulk purchases or special sales, which may include electronic versions and/or custom covers and content particular to your business, training goals, marketing focus, and branding interests. For more information, please contact: U. S. Corporate and Government Sales (800) 382-3419 [email protected] For sales outside the U. S., please contact: International Sales [email protected] Visit us on the Web: informit.com/ph © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. This publication is protected by copyright, and permission must be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, elec- tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or likewise. To obtain permission to use material from this work, please submit a written request to Pearson Education, Inc., Permissions Department, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458, or you may fax your request to (201) 236-3290.
    [Show full text]