DOCSLIB.ORG

High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH THURSDAY, THE 25 JANUARY, 2018 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 49 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 50 TO 54 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 55 TO 65 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 66 TO 76 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 25.01.2018 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 25.01.2018 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA FOR ADMISSION _______________ 1. LPA 26/2017 KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL AMITA SINGH KALKAL,J.S. CM APPL. 912/2017 & ANR BAKSHI,SUMIT AGGARWAL Vs. HARI OM SHARMA & ANR FOR HEARING / PH / AT 2:30 P.M. _______________________________ 2. CRL.REF. 2/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION THR. REFERENCE WITH CRL.REF. 3/2016 Vs. STATE 3. CRL.REF. 3/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION THR. REFERENCE Vs. STATE 25.01.2018 COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-I) HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 1. W.P.(C) 5590/2015 SHAMNAD BASHEER N. SAI VINOD,AMIT Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS MAHAJAN,NAYANTARA NARAYAN,RAJESHWARI & ASSOCIATES 2. W.P.(C) 6613/2017 ASHISH KHETAN SUNIL FERNANDES,SANJEEV Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS NARULA,GAUTAM NARAYAN END OF BOARD MATTERS / PH _________________________ 3. W.P.(C) 1393/2013 PANKAJ SHARMA SUMEDHA DUA,ARUSH KHANNA,ANJU CM APPL. 2621/2013 Vs. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL LAL,A. ROHEN SINGH,ZARTAB CM APPL. 36002/2017 CORPORATION AND ORS ANWAR,SIMA GULATI,RAJAT WITH W.P.(C) 258/2017 AGNIHOTRI,ANUJ AGGARWAL,AJJAY W.P.(C) 11268/2016 ARORAA,RAJEEV KR YADAV,SIDDHARTH ARORA,AJAY DIGPAUL 4. W.P.(C) 11268/2016 IQBAL CHAUHAN A.K.MISHRA & Vs. SOCIAL & TINUR ASSOCIATES,MUKESH GUPTA,SHYEL RESTAURANT THR SATYAJIT TREHAN,DIYA KAPUR DHINGRA & ORS 5. W.P.(C) 258/2017 ANUJA KAPUR PETITIONER IN PERSON,SUPARNA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS SRIVASTAVA,MUKESH GUPTA,NANDITA RAO 25.01.2018 2 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 25.01.2018 COURT NO. 3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA FOR ADMISSION _______________ 1. RFA(OS)(COMM) 6/2017 BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ANAND & ANAND,DEVANSHU CM APPL. 17508/2017 GMBH & ANR KHANNA,SAYA CHOUDHARY KAPUR CM APPL. 32128/2017 Vs. ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS CM APPL. 32129/2017 LTD PH AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 2. LPA 359/2017 BAYER CORPORATION SANJAY KUMAR AND ARPITA CM APPL. 17922/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS SAWHNEY,RAJESHWARI H,SINGH CM APPL. 20160/2017 AND SINGH LAW FIRM CM APPL. 33383/2017 LLP,RAJESHWARI & CM APPL. 33384/2017 ASSOCIATES,DEVANSHU KHANNA CM APPL. 47167/2017 CM APPL. 660/2018 PH FOR ARGUMENT ______________ 3. LPA 48/2017 VEDANTA LIMITED & ORS FERESHTE D SETHNA,ATHIRAA CM APPL. 2395/2017 Vs. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF PILLAI,ANURAG AHLUWALIA,VN CM APPL. 27489/2017 FOREIGN TRADE & ORS KOURA PH 25.01.2018 COURT NO.3 (DIVISION BENCH-II) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA NOTE: (i) NO PASS-OVERS WILL BE GRANTED IN THE FRESH MATTERS. (ii) IN RESPECT OF OLD MATTERS, THE MATTERS ONCE PASSED OVER WILL BE CALLED OUT AT 12.00 NOON. (iii) NO PASS OVERS WILL BE GRANTED IN THE FIRST 10 ITEMS. FOR ADMISSION _______________ 1. ITA 955/2017 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 ASHOK K MANCHANDA CM APPL. 40532/2017 Vs. DABUR INDIA LTD CM APPL. 40533/2017 WITH ITA 957/2017 2. ITA 957/2017 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 ASHOK K MANCHANDA CM APPL. 40564/2017 Vs. DABUR INDIA LTD CM APPL. 40565/2017 3. W.P.(C) 11590/2017 BOSE CORPORATION INDIA PVT. ANGAD SANDHU CM APPL. 47200/2017 LIMITED Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 25.01.2018 3 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 4. ITA 392/2017 PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LAKSHMI GURUNG (CENTRAL)-3 Vs. OSWAL CHEMICALS & FERTILISERS LTD 5. ITA 731/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME ASHEESH JAIN WITH ITA 732/2017 TAX-3, NEW DELHI Vs. DKG FINANCE & CHIT FUND PVT. LTD. 6. ITA 732/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME ASHEESH JAIN TAX-3, NEW DELHI Vs. DKG FINANCE & CHIT FUND PVT. LTD. 7. ITA 811/2017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE MANAN JAIN WITH ITA 812/2017 LIMITED ITA 813/2017 Vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 8. ITA 812/2017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE MANAN JAIN LIMITED Vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 9. ITA 813/2017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE MANAN JAIN LIMITED Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 10. ITA 825/2017 ORIFLAME INDIA PRIVATE MANAN JAIN LIMITED Vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 11. LPA 371/2016 UNION OF INDIA & ORS VIKRAM JETLY,KAVITA WADIA CM APPL. 21841/2016 Vs. FERTILIZERS ASSOCIATION CM APPL. 21842/2016 OF INDIA 12. LPA 431/2016 A P CHHABRA & ANR AMAN SAREEN,V K OHRI Vs. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NDMC) & ORS 13. W.P.(C) 4710/2015 SUBHASH CHAND GUPTA ALOK K SHARMA,SATYAKAM Vs. DY COMMISSIONER AND ANR 14. W.P.(C) 10679/2015 DELHI AND DISTRICT CRICKET RAJIV GUPTA,GAUTAM ASSOCIATION NARAYAN,SANGRAM Vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI PATNAIK,GAUTAM KUMAR DUTTA THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY & ANR. 15. W.P.(C) 9539/2017 GMMCO LIMITED KHAITAN & CO. CM APPL. 38777/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. WITH W.P.(C) 9572/2017 16. W.P.(C) 9572/2017 HAFELE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED KHAITAN & CO. CM APPL. 38984/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 17. W.P.(C) 11540/2017 LUPIN LIMITED KHAITAN & CO. CM APPL. 47018/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CM APPL. 47019/2017 25.01.2018 4 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 18. W.P.(C) 11575/2017 LUXOTTICA INDIA EYEWEAR NISHIT AGRAWAL CM APPL. 47158/2017 PRIVATE LIMITED CM APPL. 47159/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA CONNECTED MATTERS (ANMM) __________________________ 19. W.P.(C) 1708/2014 BJN HOLDINGS LIMITED PIYUSH KAUSHIK,MAYANK Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF NAGI,RUCHIR BHATIA,MAYANK INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE NAGI 20, ND 20. W.P.(C) 1709/2014 BJN HOLDINGS (I) LIMITED PIYUSH KAUSHIK,MAYANK Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF NAGI,RUCHIR BHATIA,MAYANK INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE NAGI 20, NEW DELHI 21. W.P.(C) 1710/2014 BJN HOLDINGS (BD) LIMITED PIYUSH KAUSHIK,MAYANK Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF NAGI,RUCHIR BHATIA,MAYANK INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE NAGI 20, NEW DELHI 22. W.P.(C) 1769/2014 UK PAINTS (OVERSEAS) LTD PIYUSH KAUSHIK,MAYANK Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF NAGI,RUCHIR BHATIA,MAYANK INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE NAGI 20, NEW DELHI 23. W.P.(C) 1770/2014 J&N INVESTMENT (ASIA) LIMITED PIYUSH KAUSHIK,MAYANK Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF NAGI,RUCHIR BHATIA,MAYANK INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 20, NAGI ND 24. W.P.(C) 1771/2014 JENSON & NICHOLSON (ASIA) PIYUSH KAUSHIK,MAYANK LIMITED NAGI,RUCHIR BHATIA,MAYANK Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF NAGI INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 20 ND CONNECTED MATTERS (ANMM) __________________________ 25. ITA 508/2013 M/S SONY INDIA PVT LTD DEEPAK CHOPRA & HARPREET Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME AJMANI,ASHOK TAX-II MANCHANDA,SANDEEP S. KARAHI,NAGESWAR RAO D.D. 26. ITA 509/2013 SONY INDIA PVT LTD DEEPAK CHOPRA,NAGESWAR RAO Vs. CIT III D.D.,ASHOK MANCHANDA,SANDEEP S. KARAHI 27. ITA 148/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEEPAK CHOPRA,NAGESWAR RAO Vs. SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. D.D.,ASHOK MANCHANDA,SANDEEP S. KARAHI 28. ITA 149/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - DEEPAK CHOPRA,NAGESWAR RAO III D.D.,ASHOK MANCHANDA,SANDEEP Vs. SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. S. KARAHI FOR DIRECTION ON OFFICE NOTE ______________________________ 29. ITA 1277/2010 CIT SURUCHII AGGARWAL,ACHIN GARG Vs. GREEN WORLD CORPORATION (Disposed-off Case) 25.01.2018 5 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 30. ITA 1908/2010 CIT SURUCHII AGGARWAL,ACHIN GARG Vs. THE GREEN WORLD CORPORATION (Disposed-off Case) AFTER NOTICE FOR FINAL DISPOSAL _________________________________ 31. W.P.(C) 3720/2010 PRABODH CHAUDHARY ANIL GROVER,AJAY Vs. MCD AND ORS ARORA,VIRENDER SOOD,SALEEM AHMED FOR FINAL DISPOSAL (CONNECTED) ________________________________ 32. ITA 609/2008 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ABHISHEK MARATHA,SATYEN EXEMPTION SETHI,P.ROY CHAUDHURY Vs. THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY 33. ITA 1432/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX P. ROY CHAUDHURY,SATYEN SETHI Vs. THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY FOR FINAL HEARING ___________________ 34. CO.APP. 15/2013 GOPAL KRISHAN RAJESH KUMAR & RAJIV Vs. SUPER CASSETTES SHARMA,KAMAL SAWHNEY INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS. NAGESH,ABHAY CHATTOPADHYAY 25.01.2018 COURT NO. 6 (DIVISION BENCH-III) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 1. W.P.(C) 541/2018 PLUTUS INTERNATIONAL PRIYADARSHI MANISH CM APPL. 2291/2018 Vs. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL,DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE & ORS. FOR ADMISSION _______________ 2. CM APPL. 33795/2016 BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LTD. P.S. SUDHEER,SANJEEV CM APPL. 43943/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS NARULA,GP.CAPT.KARAN SINGH In W.P.(C) 8172/2016 BHATI,SHIKHAR SAHA,SHASHI JUNEJA,AMIT MAHAJAN,ARUNAV PATNAIK 3. W.P.(C) 9575/2017 SALES TAX BAR ASSOCIATION HEMLATA RAWAT CM APPL. 38987/2017 (REGD,) & ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. CONNECTED MATTERS (ADMISSION) _______________________________ 4. W.P.(C) 6610/2014 MAHINDRA & MAHINDRA LTD. AAKASH BAJAJ,VAIBHAV LEAD CASE Vs. COMPETITION COMMISSION GAGGAR,SANJEEV NARULA OF INDIA & ANR 25.01.2018 6 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 5. W.P.(C) 6634/2014 TATA MOTORS LIMITED & ANR M/S KARANJAWALA & ORS,VAIBHAV CM APPL. 20409/2014 Vs. COMPETITION COMMISSION GAGGAR,SANJEEV NARULA OF INDIA 6. W.P.(C) 7087/2014 GENERAL MOTORS INDIA PRIVATE P & A LAW OFFICE,SANJEEV CM APPL.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Red Bengal's Rise and Fall
    kheya bag RED BENGAL’S RISE AND FALL he ouster of West Bengal’s Communist government after 34 years in power is no less of a watershed for having been widely predicted. For more than a generation the Party had shaped the culture, economy and society of one of the most Tpopulous provinces in India—91 million strong—and won massive majorities in the state assembly in seven consecutive elections. West Bengal had also provided the bulk of the Communist Party of India– Marxist (cpm) deputies to India’s parliament, the Lok Sabha; in the mid-90s its Chief Minister, Jyoti Basu, had been spoken of as the pos- sible Prime Minister of a centre-left coalition. The cpm’s fall from power also therefore suggests a change in the equation of Indian politics at the national level. But this cannot simply be read as a shift to the right. West Bengal has seen a high degree of popular mobilization against the cpm’s Beijing-style land grabs over the past decade. Though her origins lie in the state’s deeply conservative Congress Party, the challenger Mamata Banerjee based her campaign on an appeal to those dispossessed and alienated by the cpm’s breakneck capitalist-development policies, not least the party’s notoriously brutal treatment of poor peasants at Singur and Nandigram, and was herself accused by the Communists of being soft on the Maoists. The changing of the guard at Writers’ Building, the seat of the state gov- ernment in Calcutta, therefore raises a series of questions. First, why West Bengal? That is, how is it that the cpm succeeded in establishing
    [Show full text]
  • India Today State of the States Conclave
    INDIA TODAY STATE OF THE STATES CONCLAVE Good morning Ladies & Gentlemen. Welcome to the eighth edition of the India Today State of the States Conclave. I request all our delegates, all our guests to kindly take your seats in the audience. We are ready to go once there is chorum. I request once again all our guests, our delegates to kindly take your seats in the audience. Welcome to the eighth edition of the India Today’s State of the States Conclave. The Conclave was instituted back in 2003. It is India’s first ever ranking of the best and worst States to live in and work in. It is the premier indicator. It has become over the years premier indicator of which states in India have made the best use of liberalization and which are the ones that have fallen behind. It is an extensive study based on various parameters undertaken by economist Dr. Bibek Debroy and Laveesh Bhandari from Indicus. My name is Zakka Jacob. I am your host for the India Today State of the States Conclave and on behalf of the India Today family I would like to welcome each and every one of you to this morning’s function. May I now invite the Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of the India Today group Mr. Aroon Purie for the welcome address. Mr. Purie, please. Aroon Purie Hon’ble Chief Ministers, Ladies & Gentlemen, Good Morning and welcome to eighth India Today State of the States Conclave. When we first came out with State of States Report in 2003, it was more than an innovative idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Khalistan & Kashmir: a Tale of Two Conflicts
    123 Matthew Webb: Khalistan & Kashmir Khalistan & Kashmir: A Tale of Two Conflicts Matthew J. Webb Petroleum Institute _______________________________________________________________ While sharing many similarities in origin and tactics, separatist insurgencies in the Indian states of Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir have followed remarkably different trajectories. Whereas Punjab has largely returned to normalcy and been successfully re-integrated into India’s political and economic framework, in Kashmir diminished levels of violence mask a deep-seated antipathy to Indian rule. Through a comparison of the socio- economic and political realities that have shaped the both regions, this paper attempts to identify the primary reasons behind the very different paths that politics has taken in each state. Employing a distinction from the normative literature, the paper argues that mobilization behind a separatist agenda can be attributed to a range of factors broadly categorized as either ‘push’ or ‘pull’. Whereas Sikh separatism is best attributed to factors that mostly fall into the latter category in the form of economic self-interest, the Kashmiri independence movement is more motivated by ‘push’ factors centered on considerations of remedial justice. This difference, in addition to the ethnic distance between Kashmiri Muslims and mainstream Indian (Hindu) society, explains why the politics of separatism continues in Kashmir, but not Punjab. ________________________________________________________________ Introduction Of the many separatist insurgencies India has faced since independence, those in the states of Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir have proven the most destructive and potent threats to the country’s territorial integrity. Ostensibly separate movements, the campaigns for Khalistan and an independent Kashmir nonetheless shared numerous similarities in origin and tactics, and for a brief time were contemporaneous.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERVIEW 'It’S Outright War and Both Sides Are Choosing Their Weapons'
    Tehelka - The People's Paper Page 1 of 4 EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW 'It’s outright war and both sides are choosing their weapons' Chhattisgarh. Jharkhand. Bihar. Andhra Pradesh. Signposts of fractures gone too far with too little remedy. Arundhati Roy in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury on the violence rending our heartland There is an atmosphere of growing violence across the country. How do you read the signs? In what context should it be read? You don’t have to be a genius to read the signs. We have a growing middle class, reared on a diet of radical consumerism and aggressive greed. Unlike industrialising Western countries, which had colonies from which to plunder resources and generate slave labour to feed this process, we have to colonise ourselves, our own nether parts. We’ve begun to eat our own limbs. The greed that is being generated (and marketed as a value interchangeable with nationalism) can only be sated by grabbing land, water and resources from the vulnerable. What we’re witnessing is the most successful secessionist struggle ever waged in independent India — the secession of the middle and upper classes from the rest Singur and of the country. It’s a vertical secession, not a lateral one. They’re fighting for the Nandigram right to merge with the world’s elite somewhere up there in the stratosphere. make you They’ve managed to commandeer the resources, the coal, the minerals, the wonder — is bauxite, the water and electricity. Now they want the land to make more cars, more the last stop bombs, more mines — supertoys for the new supercitizens of the new superpower.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH MONDAY, THE 20 MARCH, 2017 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 48 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 49 TO 55 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 56 TO 64 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 65 TO 85 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 20.03.2017 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 20.03.2017 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-I) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 1. LPA 119/2017 M/S SHREEYANS EDUCATIONAL GAGANDEEP SHARMA,KARAN SOCIETY BHARIHOKE,S K TRIPATHI Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS 2. LPA 167/2017 RAGHAV BUILDCON PRIVATE HRISHIKESH BARUAH,AKSHAY CM APPL. 9558/2017 LIMITED MAKHIJA,H.S. PARIHAR CM APPL. 9559/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CM APPL. 9560/2017 3. LPA 172/2017 MASCOT BUILDCON PRIVATE HRISHIKESH BARUAH CM APPL. 10012/2017 LIMTED CM APPL. 10013/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CM APPL. 10014/2017 4. CM APPL. 10580/2017 MADANJIT KUMAR RAJAN KUMAR CHOURASIA,VIKAS CM APPL. 10581/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS MAHAJAN In W.P.(C) 658/2017 FOR ADMISSION _______________ 5. LPA 564/2016 VIJAY KUMAR VATS ATUL T N,PEEYOOSH KALRA CM APPL. 38130/2016 Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 6. LPA 83/2017 K M TOMAR RUCHIKA MITTAL,RAJIV KAPUR CM APPL. 4027/2017 Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS 7. LPA 137/2017 KANHAYA LAL ASHOK AGARWAL,ANUJ AGGARWAL CM APPL.
    [Show full text]
  • JCC: East Pakistan Crisis Indian Cabinet Chair: Prateek Swain Crisis Director: Alex Fager
    asdf JCC: East Pakistan Crisis Indian Cabinet Chair: Prateek Swain Crisis Director: Alex Fager JCC: East Pakistan Crisis – India PMUNC 2016 Contents Letter from the Chair…….………………………...……………………...…..3 Introduction………..…….………………………...……………………...…..5 The Situation in the Indian Subcontinent……............……………..……..……7 Setting the Stage…...………………………..……………………….……….…………7 A Brief History of Modern India..…………..……………………….……….…………9 Indo-Pakistani Relations………...…………..………………...….….……….………...10 Domestic Affairs………………………………………………………………….…...12 Current Situation……………………………………….……………………………...13 Committee Positions………..…….………………………...………………..16 2 JCC: East Pakistan Crisis – India PMUNC 2016 Letter from the Chair Dear Delegates, Namaste! I welcome you to the magnum opus of this year’s PMUNC, The JCC: East Pakistan Crisis. My name is Prateek Swain and I will be your chair for the India committee. First, I’ll introduce myself; I will be starting my sophomore year at Princeton and will be majoring in Economics or Woodrow Wilson School of Public Policy (depending on my mood when I have to declare) with a certificate in computer science. I have been debating as well as participating/chairing MUNs since my sophomore year of high school, and have carried on with these endeavors in college. Last year I was the Director for the Korean Reunification Committee at PMUNC, so I’m naturally extremely excited to be chairing this committee and have full faith that it will be a great experience for both you and me. This is certainly not my first crisis, but perhaps the one closest to my heart. Last semester, I took one of those eye opening classes at Princeton on Human Rights with Rebecca (Chair of the Pakistan committee) which set the foundation for this JCC to come into existence.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Patrimonial and Programmatic Talking About Democracy in a South Indian Village
    4 Patrimonial and Programmatic Talking about Democracy in a South Indian Village PAMELA PRICE AND DUSI SRINIVAS How do people in India participate politically, as citizens, clients and/or subjects?1 This query appears in various forms in ongoing debates concerning the extent and nature of civil society, the pitfalls of patronage democracy, and the role of illegal- ity in political practice, to name a few of the several concerns about political spheres in India. A focus for discussion has been the relationship of civil society institutions (with associated principles of equality and fairness) to political spheres driven mainly by political parties and to what Partha Chatterjee desig- nated as ‘political society’.2 Since 2005, with the publication of the monograph, Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India (Corbridge et al.), there is growing support for the argument that political cultures and practices in India, from place to place and time to time, to greater and lesser degrees, include 1. Thanks to those who commented on earlier drafts of this piece when it was presented at the Department of Political Science at the University of Hyderabad, the South Asia Symposium in Oslo, and at the workshop ‘Practices and Experiences of Democracy in Post-colonial Locali- ties’, part of the conference, ‘Democracy as Idea and Practice’ organized by the University of Oslo. We are grateful to K.C. Suri for suggesting the term ‘programmatic’ in our discussions of the findings here. Thanks to the editors of this volume, David Gilmartin and Sten Widmalm for reading and commenting on this piece.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Parliamentary Information
    The Journal of Parliamentary Information VOLUME LVII NO. 1 MARCH 2011 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. 24, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-2 2009 issue, EDITORIAL BOARD Editor : T.K. Viswanathan Secretary-General Lok Sabha Associate Editor : P.K. Misra Joint Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat Assistant Editors : Kalpana Sharma Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Pulin B. Bhutia Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Sanjeev Sachdeva Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat © Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi for approval. THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION VOLUME LVII NO. 1 MARCH 2011 CONTENTS PAGE EDITORIAL NOTE 1 ADDRESSES Inaugural Address by the Speaker, Lok Sabha, Smt. Meira Kumar at the Fourth Conference of CPA India and Asia Regions, Raipur, 25-29 October 2010 3 Address by His Excellency, Mr. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States of America, to members of Parliament 8 PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Conferences and Symposia 21 Birth Anniversaries of National Leaders 25 Exchange of Parliamentary Delegations 27 Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training 29 PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 31 SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha 43 Rajya Sabha 52 State Legislatures 54 RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 60 APPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Sixth Session of the Fifteenth Lok Sabha 64 II. Statement showing the work transacted during the Two Hundred and Twenty-first Session of the Rajya Sabha 70 (iv) III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of the States and Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2010 75 IV. List of Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President during the period 1 October to 31 December 2010 82 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Naxalism in India Naxalism
    Best Personal Counseling & Guidance about SSB Contact - R S Rathore @ 9001262627 visit us - www.targetssbinterview.com Naxalism in India The word Naxal, Naxalite or Naksalvadi is a generic term used to refer to militant Communist groups operating in different parts of India under different organizational envelopes. In the eastern states of the mainland India (Bihar, West Bengal and Orissa), they are usually known as, or refer to themselves as Maoists while in southern states like Kerala they are known under other titles. They have been declared as a terrorist organization under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act of India (1967). The term 'Naxal' derives from the name of the village Naxalbari in the state of West Bengal, India, where the movement had its origin. The Naxals are considered far-left radical communists, supportive of Maoist political sentiment and ideology. Their origin can be traced to the split in 1967 of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), leading to the formation of the Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist). Initially the movement had its centre in West Bengal. In later years, it spread into less developed areas of rural central and eastern India, such as Chhattisgarh, Orissa and Andhra Pradesh through the activities of underground groups like the Communist Party of India (Maoist). As of 2009, Naxalites were active across approximately 220 districts in twenty states of India accounting for about 40 percent of India's geographical area, They are especially concentrated in an area known as the "Red corridor", where they control 92,000 square kilometers. According to India's intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing, 20,000 armed cadre Naxalites were operating in addition to 50,000 regular cadres and their growing influence prompted Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to declare them to be the most serious internal threat to India's national security.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Affairs Q & A
    1. Which State Government has published first draft of Supreme Court monitored National Register of Citizens (NRC)? 1. Manipur 2. Mizoram 3. Assam 4. Nagaland 5. Sikkim Answer - 3. Assam Explanation : Assam State Government has published first draft of Supreme Court monitored National Register of Citizens (NRC). As per Supreme Court directive, draft NRC for Assam was to be published on or before December 31, 2017. Registrar General of India, Sailesh has stated that first draft of NRC contains names of 1.9 crore applicants. Names of these applicants have been verified out of 3.29 crore population.NRC application process in Assam started in 2015 with an objective to weed out illegal immigrants from the state. Assam Chief Minister, Sarbananda Sonowal has stated that all those individuals whose name did not appear in the draft of the NRC, may submit claims and objections against the same. 2. After Sikkim, Which state was declared as the second state in the Northeast to be declared Open Defecation Free (ODF)? 1. Manipur 2. Mizoram 3. Nagaland 4. Arunachal Pradesh 5. West Bengal Answer - 4. Arunachal Pradesh Explanation : Arunachal Pradesh was declared as the second state in the Northeast (after Sikkim), to be declared Open Defecation Free (ODF). Arunachal has attained ODF status much before the national deadline of October 2, 2019. This was made possible as under Swachh Bharat Mission (Gramin) - SBM (G), Arunachal Pradesh State government offered an incentive of Rs 8000 per toilet. This amount is in addition to the Central Government’s support of Rs 12000 per toilet, thereby raising the total grant for constructing a toilet to Rs 20000.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and the Politics of Social Citizenship in India
    Democracy and the Politics of Social Citizenship in India by Anil Mathew Varughese A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Anil Mathew Varughese (2013) DEMOCRACY AND THE POLITICS OF SOCIAL CITIZENSHIP IN INDIA Anil Mathew Varughese Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2013 Abstract Why do some pro-poor democracies in global South enact generous and universal social policies accompanied by empowering outcomes while others, similar in many ways, do not? If lower-class integration and programmatic commitment steers policy outcomes to be more egalitarian, what explains the variance in redistributive commitment within the cluster of radical democracies? These questions are examined in the context of two celebrated cases of pro-poor reform in the developing world: the Indian states of Kerala and West Bengal. Despite a host of similar background conditions (democratic framework, programmatic political parties, strong labor unions, and a high degree of subordinate-class integration), the cases display considerable variation in their redistributive commitment. Using the comparative-historical method, this dissertation seeks to explain the variance. It argues that the welfare divergences of Kerala and West Bengal are a function of their divergent modes of lower-class integration. In Kerala, a radical-mobilizational mode of ii lower-class integration has organized the poorer sections of the working classes—landless laborers and informal sector workers—in autonomous class organizations. This has enabled them to vigorously assert their interests within the working-class movement and harness state power to advance their interests through a wide range of legislative protections and statutory entitlements.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015-2016
    1 ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 CENTRE FOR STUDIES IN SOCIAL SCIENCES, CALCUTTA R-1 Baishnabghata-Patuli Township, Kolkata 700 094 2 3 Centre For Studies In Social Sciences, Calcutta Annual Report 2015-2016 CONTENTS Page Numbers 1. Director’s Note 5 2. List of Members of the Board of Governors / 10 List of Faculty Members / List of Administrative Staff 3. Research Projects – Completed and On-going 14 4. Academic Activities of Faculty Members 18 5. Teaching Programmes and Students’ Enrollment Lists 79 6. Academic Events 103 7. Archive and Library 125 8. Centre for Training and Research in Public 130 Finance and Policy (CTRPFP) 9. Jadunath Bhavan Museum & Resource Centre (JBM&RC) 137 10. Affiliation of Scholars from other Academic Institutions 142 and Institutional Collaborations 11. Report on COGSASH Activities 146 12. Statement of Accounts 147 4 5 Director’s Note The Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta (CSSSC) was founded on 1st February 1973 and soon gained national and international recognition as a premier research institution of the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR). Over the past four decades, the institution has kept going its reputation as a key centre in the promotion and advancement of research and teaching in the humanities and different social sciences disciplines. Over the years, the disciplines and areas of research represented at the CSSSC have significantly diversified to include cultural studies, gender studies, performance studies, development and environmental studies, alongside its continuing older strengths in the fields of history, politics and economics. The institution’s profile has been shaped both by the individual academic work of its faculty, and by its different collective and collaborative programmes - like running conferences, workshops and training programmes; hosting a weekly seminar series by its own faculty and by visiting scholars; organising documentary film screenings; conducting a full-time M.Phil.
    [Show full text]