India Today State of the States Conclave

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

India Today State of the States Conclave INDIA TODAY STATE OF THE STATES CONCLAVE Good morning Ladies & Gentlemen. Welcome to the eighth edition of the India Today State of the States Conclave. I request all our delegates, all our guests to kindly take your seats in the audience. We are ready to go once there is chorum. I request once again all our guests, our delegates to kindly take your seats in the audience. Welcome to the eighth edition of the India Today’s State of the States Conclave. The Conclave was instituted back in 2003. It is India’s first ever ranking of the best and worst States to live in and work in. It is the premier indicator. It has become over the years premier indicator of which states in India have made the best use of liberalization and which are the ones that have fallen behind. It is an extensive study based on various parameters undertaken by economist Dr. Bibek Debroy and Laveesh Bhandari from Indicus. My name is Zakka Jacob. I am your host for the India Today State of the States Conclave and on behalf of the India Today family I would like to welcome each and every one of you to this morning’s function. May I now invite the Chairman and Editor-in-Chief of the India Today group Mr. Aroon Purie for the welcome address. Mr. Purie, please. Aroon Purie Hon’ble Chief Ministers, Ladies & Gentlemen, Good Morning and welcome to eighth India Today State of the States Conclave. When we first came out with State of States Report in 2003, it was more than an innovative idea. It was part of an ongoing effort to make our journalism more participative and more collaborative. Then we were already into the second year of the India Today Conclave which is an international event in ideas and the first of its kind in journalism in India. By the State of States Reports, another first in Indian journalism, we wanted to create the gold standard for governance. We thought we needed more than conventional reporting to do that. At a time when perception overshadowed reality; when propaganda buried facts, we wanted to create a foolproof method to measure performance and governance. To do the job, we roped in two fine economists. They created a method, which I am proud to say is today the most accurate, objective and credible way to assess the performance of the States. Their study is based on each States performance in infrastructure, governance, health, education, investment, macro-economy, consumer markets and agriculture. I must take this opportunity to stress on the most important aspect of our study, objectivity. It is this religious adherence to objectivity that delivers credibility and acceptability. Our methodology is transparent and auditable. The study is hundred per cent based on performance data without even a hint of subjectivity. Our experts, Professor Bibek Debroy and Laveesh Bhandari are in fact present here and will be happy to clarify any doubts or misplaced notions. Our aim is to present our readers and the nation with a complete picture of where the States stand in terms of performance. In an age of sound bites and instant judgment our study provides the most definitive progress report on performance. With great pleasure and gratitude I want to say that it has been taken so by the Chief Ministers themselves. The presence of so many of them, all brand ambassadors of change, is a tribute to the credibility of the Report. It is an honour too. Their support and participation make the effort all the more worthwhile. One thing is for sure that India is constantly changing. So every year the State of States Report has some surprises. I won’t disclose the winners of the various awards but just that there are new challengers to those who have been sitting, somewhat complacently, on top. The slow and steady rise of Himachel Pradesh is a story in quiet determination. Interestingly States like Uttarakhand and Jammu & Kashmir have shown great result in investment. Surprisingly, Punjab, Goa, Haryana, Karnataka and Gujarat are lagging. In macro-economy, Jammu & Kashmir, Haryana and Punjab have shown notable improvement, though there is much to be expected from big States like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh. In infrastructure, Tamil Nadu has registered a commendable rise from the sixth to the second. In primary education, there is still much to be desired from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and even Delhi. The role models are still Himachel Pradesh, Kerala and Sikkim. In governance, I think it is time to give our comrades some credit. West Bengal has jumped from last year’s miserable twentieth position to respectable fifteen this year. This is a great leap forward indeed and Kerala is going strong and far ahead. In primary health, Bihar may still have a long way to go, but it is catching up. And it is some good news for a State which is still at the bottom in its overall performance. Another big surprise is from Gujarat, a State that never ceases to surprise us, and now- a-days with news, about governance. It was for so long the most investive friendly State in the country, but now Gujarat is on the rise in the agriculture sector too. Ladies and Gentlemen, every year to bring a sense of immediacy and urgency to the Report, we add a new category. This year we have focused on a subject that poses the biggest threat from within to our national security, the Maoists insurgency. We have done an exhaustive study of the socio-economic and the law and orders situation in seventy-two Naxal affected districts, spread across nine States. The study assumes greater significance because the country seems to be at a loss in coming out with a clear minded policy on the bloodiest war within. The collaboration of the Center and the State to tackle this dangerous problem is of paramount importance. Taken together, our Report is more than a reflection of the State of the States. It is, if I may say so, is the State of the Nation. It is a portrait of a country where the ruler can no longer win by words, but by actions that can make a difference to the lives of the people for the better; where the winner is not the manipulator of massed minds, but action heroes for whom development is not a slogan, but an article of faith; where good politics is all about good governance; where retrick is not an alternative to performance. This Report comes at a time when India’s international aspiration to become a global power is at its peak. But we need more than seat at the Security Council. We need to make better roads; we need to make primary education accessible to all our children; we need to make health care accessible to all. In short, we need to make development the national religion of the political class. India is not built from Delhi alone. The real work takes place in the States. We have with us the Chief Ministers, whom I would like to call the ‘Makers of Modern India’ in the two panel discussions we have planned focusing on development resources and dealing with Maoists insurgency. I am sure they will enlighten us with their ideas of how we can govern better. Let me welcome you all once more. I am particularly grateful to the Chief Ministers, all winners and performers, who have joined us in our endeavour to make the India Today’s Sate of States Report a blueprint for effective governance. Thank you Sir. Zakka Jacob Thank you Mr. Purie. Like the Prime Minister said, if India has to achieve nine per cent growth, year on year / year after year, then the fulcrum of that growth has to be India’s states. And one of the critical issues which face our States is the issue of infrastructure. Now for a special presentation on Infrastructure Security, a new paradigm for accelerated development, may I call upon the Managing Director and the CEO of IL&FS, Mr. Hari Sankaran. Ladies & Gentlemen, Mr. Hari Sankaran. Hari Sankaran Hon’ble Chief Ministers, Ladies & Gentlemen, a very Good Morning. This is a presentation, a very brief one, to outline a particular model which we believe provides a platform for the accelerated development of regions under severe security threat and where the developmental outcomes have not as yet reached. There are three challenges in a global sense that are facing this country. The first is that India’s urban incomes growing at more than six times faster than rural incomes, which in itself is putting huge pressures on the way in which our demography and our geographies work. One instance of it is that we forecast four hundred million Indians to move from rural India to urban India in the next thirty years. The already strained infrastructure of our cities will simply be unable to cope with this challenge. What is our response and what is the infrastructure that is required to be put in place to handle this crisis? Related to that are health issues, environmental issues, issues of skills, of employment and of overall development as a result of that. On the back of this kind of crisis, it is very difficult to see how a nine per cent strategy of growth can be sustained. And, therefore, it is critical that we find a solution to this problem in a integrated and holistic sense. And, therefore, the challenge is to find a way in which urbanization can be handled in this country, but perhaps much more importantly in the context of today’s debate, how we handle the issue of security, because rural India is exploding with frustration and lack of growth.
Recommended publications
  • Red Bengal's Rise and Fall
    kheya bag RED BENGAL’S RISE AND FALL he ouster of West Bengal’s Communist government after 34 years in power is no less of a watershed for having been widely predicted. For more than a generation the Party had shaped the culture, economy and society of one of the most Tpopulous provinces in India—91 million strong—and won massive majorities in the state assembly in seven consecutive elections. West Bengal had also provided the bulk of the Communist Party of India– Marxist (cpm) deputies to India’s parliament, the Lok Sabha; in the mid-90s its Chief Minister, Jyoti Basu, had been spoken of as the pos- sible Prime Minister of a centre-left coalition. The cpm’s fall from power also therefore suggests a change in the equation of Indian politics at the national level. But this cannot simply be read as a shift to the right. West Bengal has seen a high degree of popular mobilization against the cpm’s Beijing-style land grabs over the past decade. Though her origins lie in the state’s deeply conservative Congress Party, the challenger Mamata Banerjee based her campaign on an appeal to those dispossessed and alienated by the cpm’s breakneck capitalist-development policies, not least the party’s notoriously brutal treatment of poor peasants at Singur and Nandigram, and was herself accused by the Communists of being soft on the Maoists. The changing of the guard at Writers’ Building, the seat of the state gov- ernment in Calcutta, therefore raises a series of questions. First, why West Bengal? That is, how is it that the cpm succeeded in establishing
    [Show full text]
  • Khalistan & Kashmir: a Tale of Two Conflicts
    123 Matthew Webb: Khalistan & Kashmir Khalistan & Kashmir: A Tale of Two Conflicts Matthew J. Webb Petroleum Institute _______________________________________________________________ While sharing many similarities in origin and tactics, separatist insurgencies in the Indian states of Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir have followed remarkably different trajectories. Whereas Punjab has largely returned to normalcy and been successfully re-integrated into India’s political and economic framework, in Kashmir diminished levels of violence mask a deep-seated antipathy to Indian rule. Through a comparison of the socio- economic and political realities that have shaped the both regions, this paper attempts to identify the primary reasons behind the very different paths that politics has taken in each state. Employing a distinction from the normative literature, the paper argues that mobilization behind a separatist agenda can be attributed to a range of factors broadly categorized as either ‘push’ or ‘pull’. Whereas Sikh separatism is best attributed to factors that mostly fall into the latter category in the form of economic self-interest, the Kashmiri independence movement is more motivated by ‘push’ factors centered on considerations of remedial justice. This difference, in addition to the ethnic distance between Kashmiri Muslims and mainstream Indian (Hindu) society, explains why the politics of separatism continues in Kashmir, but not Punjab. ________________________________________________________________ Introduction Of the many separatist insurgencies India has faced since independence, those in the states of Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir have proven the most destructive and potent threats to the country’s territorial integrity. Ostensibly separate movements, the campaigns for Khalistan and an independent Kashmir nonetheless shared numerous similarities in origin and tactics, and for a brief time were contemporaneous.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERVIEW 'It’S Outright War and Both Sides Are Choosing Their Weapons'
    Tehelka - The People's Paper Page 1 of 4 EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW 'It’s outright war and both sides are choosing their weapons' Chhattisgarh. Jharkhand. Bihar. Andhra Pradesh. Signposts of fractures gone too far with too little remedy. Arundhati Roy in conversation with Shoma Chaudhury on the violence rending our heartland There is an atmosphere of growing violence across the country. How do you read the signs? In what context should it be read? You don’t have to be a genius to read the signs. We have a growing middle class, reared on a diet of radical consumerism and aggressive greed. Unlike industrialising Western countries, which had colonies from which to plunder resources and generate slave labour to feed this process, we have to colonise ourselves, our own nether parts. We’ve begun to eat our own limbs. The greed that is being generated (and marketed as a value interchangeable with nationalism) can only be sated by grabbing land, water and resources from the vulnerable. What we’re witnessing is the most successful secessionist struggle ever waged in independent India — the secession of the middle and upper classes from the rest Singur and of the country. It’s a vertical secession, not a lateral one. They’re fighting for the Nandigram right to merge with the world’s elite somewhere up there in the stratosphere. make you They’ve managed to commandeer the resources, the coal, the minerals, the wonder — is bauxite, the water and electricity. Now they want the land to make more cars, more the last stop bombs, more mines — supertoys for the new supercitizens of the new superpower.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH MONDAY, THE 20 MARCH, 2017 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 48 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 49 TO 55 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 56 TO 64 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 65 TO 85 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 20.03.2017 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 20.03.2017 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-I) HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL FRESH MATTERS & APPLICATIONS ______________________________ 1. LPA 119/2017 M/S SHREEYANS EDUCATIONAL GAGANDEEP SHARMA,KARAN SOCIETY BHARIHOKE,S K TRIPATHI Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS 2. LPA 167/2017 RAGHAV BUILDCON PRIVATE HRISHIKESH BARUAH,AKSHAY CM APPL. 9558/2017 LIMITED MAKHIJA,H.S. PARIHAR CM APPL. 9559/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CM APPL. 9560/2017 3. LPA 172/2017 MASCOT BUILDCON PRIVATE HRISHIKESH BARUAH CM APPL. 10012/2017 LIMTED CM APPL. 10013/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CM APPL. 10014/2017 4. CM APPL. 10580/2017 MADANJIT KUMAR RAJAN KUMAR CHOURASIA,VIKAS CM APPL. 10581/2017 Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS MAHAJAN In W.P.(C) 658/2017 FOR ADMISSION _______________ 5. LPA 564/2016 VIJAY KUMAR VATS ATUL T N,PEEYOOSH KALRA CM APPL. 38130/2016 Vs. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 6. LPA 83/2017 K M TOMAR RUCHIKA MITTAL,RAJIV KAPUR CM APPL. 4027/2017 Vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS 7. LPA 137/2017 KANHAYA LAL ASHOK AGARWAL,ANUJ AGGARWAL CM APPL.
    [Show full text]
  • JCC: East Pakistan Crisis Indian Cabinet Chair: Prateek Swain Crisis Director: Alex Fager
    asdf JCC: East Pakistan Crisis Indian Cabinet Chair: Prateek Swain Crisis Director: Alex Fager JCC: East Pakistan Crisis – India PMUNC 2016 Contents Letter from the Chair…….………………………...……………………...…..3 Introduction………..…….………………………...……………………...…..5 The Situation in the Indian Subcontinent……............……………..……..……7 Setting the Stage…...………………………..……………………….……….…………7 A Brief History of Modern India..…………..……………………….……….…………9 Indo-Pakistani Relations………...…………..………………...….….……….………...10 Domestic Affairs………………………………………………………………….…...12 Current Situation……………………………………….……………………………...13 Committee Positions………..…….………………………...………………..16 2 JCC: East Pakistan Crisis – India PMUNC 2016 Letter from the Chair Dear Delegates, Namaste! I welcome you to the magnum opus of this year’s PMUNC, The JCC: East Pakistan Crisis. My name is Prateek Swain and I will be your chair for the India committee. First, I’ll introduce myself; I will be starting my sophomore year at Princeton and will be majoring in Economics or Woodrow Wilson School of Public Policy (depending on my mood when I have to declare) with a certificate in computer science. I have been debating as well as participating/chairing MUNs since my sophomore year of high school, and have carried on with these endeavors in college. Last year I was the Director for the Korean Reunification Committee at PMUNC, so I’m naturally extremely excited to be chairing this committee and have full faith that it will be a great experience for both you and me. This is certainly not my first crisis, but perhaps the one closest to my heart. Last semester, I took one of those eye opening classes at Princeton on Human Rights with Rebecca (Chair of the Pakistan committee) which set the foundation for this JCC to come into existence.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Patrimonial and Programmatic Talking About Democracy in a South Indian Village
    4 Patrimonial and Programmatic Talking about Democracy in a South Indian Village PAMELA PRICE AND DUSI SRINIVAS How do people in India participate politically, as citizens, clients and/or subjects?1 This query appears in various forms in ongoing debates concerning the extent and nature of civil society, the pitfalls of patronage democracy, and the role of illegal- ity in political practice, to name a few of the several concerns about political spheres in India. A focus for discussion has been the relationship of civil society institutions (with associated principles of equality and fairness) to political spheres driven mainly by political parties and to what Partha Chatterjee desig- nated as ‘political society’.2 Since 2005, with the publication of the monograph, Seeing the State: Governance and Governmentality in India (Corbridge et al.), there is growing support for the argument that political cultures and practices in India, from place to place and time to time, to greater and lesser degrees, include 1. Thanks to those who commented on earlier drafts of this piece when it was presented at the Department of Political Science at the University of Hyderabad, the South Asia Symposium in Oslo, and at the workshop ‘Practices and Experiences of Democracy in Post-colonial Locali- ties’, part of the conference, ‘Democracy as Idea and Practice’ organized by the University of Oslo. We are grateful to K.C. Suri for suggesting the term ‘programmatic’ in our discussions of the findings here. Thanks to the editors of this volume, David Gilmartin and Sten Widmalm for reading and commenting on this piece.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Parliamentary Information
    The Journal of Parliamentary Information VOLUME LVII NO. 1 MARCH 2011 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. 24, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-2 2009 issue, EDITORIAL BOARD Editor : T.K. Viswanathan Secretary-General Lok Sabha Associate Editor : P.K. Misra Joint Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat Assistant Editors : Kalpana Sharma Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Pulin B. Bhutia Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Sanjeev Sachdeva Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat © Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi for approval. THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION VOLUME LVII NO. 1 MARCH 2011 CONTENTS PAGE EDITORIAL NOTE 1 ADDRESSES Inaugural Address by the Speaker, Lok Sabha, Smt. Meira Kumar at the Fourth Conference of CPA India and Asia Regions, Raipur, 25-29 October 2010 3 Address by His Excellency, Mr. Barack H. Obama, President of the United States of America, to members of Parliament 8 PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Conferences and Symposia 21 Birth Anniversaries of National Leaders 25 Exchange of Parliamentary Delegations 27 Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training 29 PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 31 SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha 43 Rajya Sabha 52 State Legislatures 54 RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 60 APPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Sixth Session of the Fifteenth Lok Sabha 64 II. Statement showing the work transacted during the Two Hundred and Twenty-first Session of the Rajya Sabha 70 (iv) III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of the States and Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2010 75 IV. List of Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President during the period 1 October to 31 December 2010 82 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Naxalism in India Naxalism
    Best Personal Counseling & Guidance about SSB Contact - R S Rathore @ 9001262627 visit us - www.targetssbinterview.com Naxalism in India The word Naxal, Naxalite or Naksalvadi is a generic term used to refer to militant Communist groups operating in different parts of India under different organizational envelopes. In the eastern states of the mainland India (Bihar, West Bengal and Orissa), they are usually known as, or refer to themselves as Maoists while in southern states like Kerala they are known under other titles. They have been declared as a terrorist organization under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act of India (1967). The term 'Naxal' derives from the name of the village Naxalbari in the state of West Bengal, India, where the movement had its origin. The Naxals are considered far-left radical communists, supportive of Maoist political sentiment and ideology. Their origin can be traced to the split in 1967 of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), leading to the formation of the Communist Party of India (Marxist–Leninist). Initially the movement had its centre in West Bengal. In later years, it spread into less developed areas of rural central and eastern India, such as Chhattisgarh, Orissa and Andhra Pradesh through the activities of underground groups like the Communist Party of India (Maoist). As of 2009, Naxalites were active across approximately 220 districts in twenty states of India accounting for about 40 percent of India's geographical area, They are especially concentrated in an area known as the "Red corridor", where they control 92,000 square kilometers. According to India's intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing, 20,000 armed cadre Naxalites were operating in addition to 50,000 regular cadres and their growing influence prompted Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to declare them to be the most serious internal threat to India's national security.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Affairs Q & A
    1. Which State Government has published first draft of Supreme Court monitored National Register of Citizens (NRC)? 1. Manipur 2. Mizoram 3. Assam 4. Nagaland 5. Sikkim Answer - 3. Assam Explanation : Assam State Government has published first draft of Supreme Court monitored National Register of Citizens (NRC). As per Supreme Court directive, draft NRC for Assam was to be published on or before December 31, 2017. Registrar General of India, Sailesh has stated that first draft of NRC contains names of 1.9 crore applicants. Names of these applicants have been verified out of 3.29 crore population.NRC application process in Assam started in 2015 with an objective to weed out illegal immigrants from the state. Assam Chief Minister, Sarbananda Sonowal has stated that all those individuals whose name did not appear in the draft of the NRC, may submit claims and objections against the same. 2. After Sikkim, Which state was declared as the second state in the Northeast to be declared Open Defecation Free (ODF)? 1. Manipur 2. Mizoram 3. Nagaland 4. Arunachal Pradesh 5. West Bengal Answer - 4. Arunachal Pradesh Explanation : Arunachal Pradesh was declared as the second state in the Northeast (after Sikkim), to be declared Open Defecation Free (ODF). Arunachal has attained ODF status much before the national deadline of October 2, 2019. This was made possible as under Swachh Bharat Mission (Gramin) - SBM (G), Arunachal Pradesh State government offered an incentive of Rs 8000 per toilet. This amount is in addition to the Central Government’s support of Rs 12000 per toilet, thereby raising the total grant for constructing a toilet to Rs 20000.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and the Politics of Social Citizenship in India
    Democracy and the Politics of Social Citizenship in India by Anil Mathew Varughese A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Anil Mathew Varughese (2013) DEMOCRACY AND THE POLITICS OF SOCIAL CITIZENSHIP IN INDIA Anil Mathew Varughese Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2013 Abstract Why do some pro-poor democracies in global South enact generous and universal social policies accompanied by empowering outcomes while others, similar in many ways, do not? If lower-class integration and programmatic commitment steers policy outcomes to be more egalitarian, what explains the variance in redistributive commitment within the cluster of radical democracies? These questions are examined in the context of two celebrated cases of pro-poor reform in the developing world: the Indian states of Kerala and West Bengal. Despite a host of similar background conditions (democratic framework, programmatic political parties, strong labor unions, and a high degree of subordinate-class integration), the cases display considerable variation in their redistributive commitment. Using the comparative-historical method, this dissertation seeks to explain the variance. It argues that the welfare divergences of Kerala and West Bengal are a function of their divergent modes of lower-class integration. In Kerala, a radical-mobilizational mode of ii lower-class integration has organized the poorer sections of the working classes—landless laborers and informal sector workers—in autonomous class organizations. This has enabled them to vigorously assert their interests within the working-class movement and harness state power to advance their interests through a wide range of legislative protections and statutory entitlements.
    [Show full text]
  • High Court of Delhi Advance Cause List
    HIGH COURT OF DELHI ADVANCE CAUSE LIST LIST OF BUSINESS FOR TH THURSDAY, THE 25 JANUARY, 2018 INDEX PAGES 1. APPELLATE JURISDICTION 01 TO 49 2. COMPANY JURISDICTION 50 TO 54 3. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION 55 TO 65 4. REGISTRAR GENERAL/ 66 TO 76 REGISTRAR(ORGL.)/ REGISTRAR (ADMN.)/ JOINT REGISTRARS(ORGL). 25.01.2018 1 (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) 25.01.2018 [Note : Unless otherwise specified, before all appellate side courts, fresh matters shown in the supplementary lists will be taken up first.] COURT NO. 1 HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA FOR ADMISSION _______________ 1. LPA 26/2017 KULACHI HANSRAJ MODEL SCHOOL AMITA SINGH KALKAL,J.S. CM APPL. 912/2017 & ANR BAKSHI,SUMIT AGGARWAL Vs. HARI OM SHARMA & ANR FOR HEARING / PH / AT 2:30 P.M. _______________________________ 2. CRL.REF. 2/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION THR. REFERENCE WITH CRL.REF. 3/2016 Vs. STATE 3. CRL.REF. 3/2016 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION THR. REFERENCE Vs. STATE 25.01.2018 COURT NO. 1 (DIVISION BENCH-I) HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR AFTER NOTICE MISC. MATTERS ____________________________ 1. W.P.(C) 5590/2015 SHAMNAD BASHEER N. SAI VINOD,AMIT Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS MAHAJAN,NAYANTARA NARAYAN,RAJESHWARI & ASSOCIATES 2. W.P.(C) 6613/2017 ASHISH KHETAN SUNIL FERNANDES,SANJEEV Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS NARULA,GAUTAM NARAYAN END OF BOARD MATTERS / PH _________________________ 3. W.P.(C) 1393/2013 PANKAJ SHARMA SUMEDHA DUA,ARUSH KHANNA,ANJU CM APPL. 2621/2013 Vs. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL LAL,A.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015-2016
    1 ANNUAL REPORT 2015-2016 CENTRE FOR STUDIES IN SOCIAL SCIENCES, CALCUTTA R-1 Baishnabghata-Patuli Township, Kolkata 700 094 2 3 Centre For Studies In Social Sciences, Calcutta Annual Report 2015-2016 CONTENTS Page Numbers 1. Director’s Note 5 2. List of Members of the Board of Governors / 10 List of Faculty Members / List of Administrative Staff 3. Research Projects – Completed and On-going 14 4. Academic Activities of Faculty Members 18 5. Teaching Programmes and Students’ Enrollment Lists 79 6. Academic Events 103 7. Archive and Library 125 8. Centre for Training and Research in Public 130 Finance and Policy (CTRPFP) 9. Jadunath Bhavan Museum & Resource Centre (JBM&RC) 137 10. Affiliation of Scholars from other Academic Institutions 142 and Institutional Collaborations 11. Report on COGSASH Activities 146 12. Statement of Accounts 147 4 5 Director’s Note The Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta (CSSSC) was founded on 1st February 1973 and soon gained national and international recognition as a premier research institution of the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR). Over the past four decades, the institution has kept going its reputation as a key centre in the promotion and advancement of research and teaching in the humanities and different social sciences disciplines. Over the years, the disciplines and areas of research represented at the CSSSC have significantly diversified to include cultural studies, gender studies, performance studies, development and environmental studies, alongside its continuing older strengths in the fields of history, politics and economics. The institution’s profile has been shaped both by the individual academic work of its faculty, and by its different collective and collaborative programmes - like running conferences, workshops and training programmes; hosting a weekly seminar series by its own faculty and by visiting scholars; organising documentary film screenings; conducting a full-time M.Phil.
    [Show full text]