DOCSLIB.ORG

Curriculum Vitae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curriculum Vitae CURRICULUM VITAE CHRISTOPHER JONES Christopher Jones, Senior Legal Counsel Ministry of Attorney General Legal Services Branch Environment, Resource and Aboriginal Law Group Suite 340– 1675 Douglas Street Victoria, BC Phone: (250) 356-0464 Fax: (250) 387-6597 E-mail: [email protected] ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Degree or Diploma Field Institution Year Granted LL.B. Law Dalhousie University 1993 B.A. (High Distinction) Political Science and University of Toronto 1989 Environmental Studies Solicitor, Resource, Environmental & Land Law Group, Legal Services Branch, Ministry of Attorney General, since April 2005. o Appointed Senior Legal Counsel in March 2012. Lawyer, Arvay Finlay, Barristers, Victoria and Vancouver, June 1997 – March 2005. Lawyer, Guild Yule and Company, Vancouver, 1995-97. Called to the Bar of the Province of British Columbia in March 1996. Clerk, Federal Court of Canada, Ottawa, 1993-95. Legislative Intern, Ontario Legislature Internship Program, 1989-90. COUNSEL OF RECORD, SELECTED CASES For the Province of British Columbia: Northern Gateway Project, Application for approval under the National Energy Board Act and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2013 Application by BC Hydro for the filing of Energy Supply Contracts with Alcan Inc., 2006 British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority/FortisBC Inc. Application for Exemptions Regarding the Canal Plant Agreement, 2005 Application to Construct the Georgia Strait Crossing Natural Gas Pipeline, National Energy Board, 2003 Sumas Energy 2, Inc., Application to Construct an International Power Line, National Energy Board, 2001 (For the Sierra Club of Canada) BC Hydro 2005-2006 Revenue Requirements Application, British Columbia Utilities Commission, 2004 (For Westcoast Gas Services Inc.) B.C. Gas Utility Ltd., Southern Crossing Pipeline Project, Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, British Columbia Utilities Commission, March 1999 ADVISING SOLICITOR, SELECTED LEGISLATION Clean Energy Act, SBC 2010, c. 22 Major amendments to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Act, RSBC 1996, c. 361 Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements) Act, SBC 2008, c. 16 Utilities Commission Amendment Act, SBC 2008, c. 15 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets Act, SBC 2007 c. 42 PROFESSIONAL ACHIEVEMENTS Adjunct Professor, University of Victoria: Energy Law 2013 Sessional Professor, University of Victoria: Oil and Gas Law, 2002-2004, 2007 Sessional Professor, University of British Columbia, Regulatory Law, 2003-2004 Chair, “Maximizing Opportunities and Profiting from the Evolving Electricity Sector”, Canadian Institute Conference, Vancouver, December 2004 Co-chair (with the Hon. Roger Kerans), “BC Offshore Resources: A MASC Lawyers Workshop”, Maritime Awards Society of Canada, Victoria, March 2004 Director, Canadian Institute of Energy (BC), 2000- Director, Maritime Awards Society of Canada, 2011- Gale Moot Team Coach, University of Victoria, 1998-2000. Chair, "Streamlining the Approval of Oil and Gas Operations in B.C.", Insight Canada Conference, Calgary, December 1999 Participated in creating the Oil and Gas Commission Act, S.B.C. 1998, c. 39 Contributor, World Health Organization Reference to the International Court of Justice, 1994. Member Works of Art and Committee and Foundation Board, Art Gallery of Greater Victoria, 2012- PUBLICATIONS (With Murray Rankin et al.) “A Comparative Analysis of Law and Policy on Access to Health Care Provider Data” (2001), 14 C.J.A.L.P. 225. (With Murray Rankin) “Conflicts Involving Water in British Columbia: The Provincial Perspective”, Law Seminars International, Canadian Water Law Conference, October 1999. (With Murray Rankin et al.) “Regulatory Reform in the British Columbia Petroleum Industry: The Oil and Gas Commission” (2000), 38:1 Alta. Law Rev. 143. (With Peter Johnson) “Case Comment: Harrington (Guardian ad litem of) v. Royal Inland Hospital” (1997), 55 The Advocate 693. (With Vaughan Black) “Thomson v. Thomson” Case Comment (1995), 12 C.F.L.Q. 321. “Question Period Tactics and the Ontario New Democratic Party” in Graham White ed., Inside the Pink Palace: Ontario Legislative Internship Program Essays, (Toronto: The Canadian Political Science Association, 1994). .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LIST of YOUR MLAS in the PROVINCE of BRITISH COLUMBIA As of April 2021
    LIST OF YOUR MLAS IN THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA As of April 2021 NAME RIDING CAUCUS Bruce Banman Abbotsford South BC Liberal Party Michael de Jong, Q.C. Abbotsford West BC Liberal Party Pam Alexis Abbotsford-Mission BC NDP Roly Russell Boundary-Similkameen BC NDP Janet Routledge Burnaby North BC NDP Hon. Anne Kang Burnaby-Deer Lake BC NDP Hon. Raj Chouhan Burnaby-Edmonds BC NDP Hon. Katrina Chen Burnaby-Lougheed BC NDP Coralee Oakes Cariboo North BC Liberal Party Lorne Doerkson Cariboo-Chilcotin BC Liberal Party Dan Coulter Chilliwack BC NDP Kelli Paddon Chilliwack-Kent BC NDP Doug Clovechok Columbia River-Revelstoke BC Liberal Party Fin Donnelly Coquitlam-Burke Mountain BC NDP Hon. Selina Robinson Coquitlam-Maillardville BC NDP Ronna-Rae Leonard Courtenay-Comox BC NDP Sonia Furstenau Cowichan Valley BC Green Party Hon. Ravi Kahlon Delta North BC NDP Ian Paton Delta South BC Liberal Party G:\Hotlines\2021\2021-04-14_LIST OF YOUR MLAS IN THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA.docx Hon. Mitzi Dean Esquimalt-Metchosin BC NDP Jackie Tegart Fraser-Nicola BC Liberal Party Peter Milobar Kamloops-North Thompson BC Liberal Party Todd Stone Kamloops-South Thompson BC Liberal Party Ben Stewart Kelowna West BC Liberal Party Norm Letnick Kelowna-Lake Country BC Liberal Party Renee Merrifield Kelowna-Mission BC Liberal Party Tom Shypitka Kootenay East BC Liberal Party Hon. Katrine Conroy Kootenay West BC NDP Hon. John Horgan Langford-Juan de Fuca BC NDP Andrew Mercier Langley BC NDP Megan Dykeman Langley East BC NDP Bob D'Eith Maple Ridge-Mission BC NDP Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report of Debates (Hansard)
    First Session, 42nd Parliament OFFICIAL REPORT OF DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday, March 1, 2021 Afernoon Sitting Issue No. 16 THE HONOURABLE RAJ CHOUHAN, SPEAKER ISSN 1499-2175 PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Entered Confederation July 20, 1871) LIEUTENANT-GOVERNOR Her Honour the Honourable Janet Austin, OBC First Session, 42nd Parliament SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Honourable Raj Chouhan EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Premier and President of the Executive Council ............................................................................................................... Hon. John Horgan Minister of Advanced Education and Skills Training...........................................................................................................Hon. Anne Kang Minister of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries......................................................................................................................Hon. Lana Popham Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Housing .............................................................................................Hon. David Eby, QC Minister of Children and Family Development ....................................................................................................................Hon. Mitzi Dean Minister of State for Child Care......................................................................................................................................Hon. Katrina Chen Minister of Citizens’ Services.....................................................................................................................................................Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • November 26, 2020 Honourable Murray Rankin Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation Parliament Buildings Victoria, Br
    November 26, 2020 Honourable Murray Rankin Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation Parliament Buildings Victoria, British Columbia V8V 1X4 Dear Minister Rankin: Thank you for agreeing to serve British Columbians as Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation. You are taking on this responsibility at a time when people in our province face significant challenges as a result of the global COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 has turned the lives of British Columbians upside down. None of us expected to face the challenges of the past number of months, yet British Columbians have demonstrated incredible resilience, time and time again. We will get through the pandemic and its aftereffects by building on this resilience and focusing on what matters most to people. British Columbians voted for a government focused on their priorities: fighting the COVID-19 pandemic, providing better health care for people and families, delivering affordability and security in our communities, and investing in good jobs and livelihoods in a clean-energy future. I expect you – and the work of your ministry – to focus on the commitments detailed in our platform, Working for You, along with the following foundational principles: ● Putting people first: Since 2017, our government has focused on making decisions to meet people's needs. That focus drove our work in our first term and will continue to be our priority. British Columbians are counting on the government to keep them safe and to build an economic recovery that works for everyone, not just those at the top. Keeping people at the centre of everything we do means protecting and enhancing the public services people rely on and working to make life more affordable for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    June 29, 2016 Standing Committee on International Trade 6th Floor 131 Queen Street House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 via email: [email protected] Dear Committee Members: In recent months, there has been a great deal of debate about the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) and what it means for Canada. The federal government has committed to a study of the agreement’s potential impacts on the Canadian economy; however, to date nothing has been made public, and we have been told no such study yet exists. How can the government possibly sign onto a massive international trade agreement without knowing the impacts it will have, or the potential consequences for the Canadian economy, the public and the environment? In fact, it would be irresponsible to proceed in this way. A genuine and independent economic impact analysis that considers all the implications of this agreement should be mandatory. Possibly one of the reasons for this failure to do an impact study is that the government knows full well that any benefits from the TPP will be marginal at best, while the damage done will be serious. A 2016 study from the C.D. Howe Institute predicts that the macroeconomic impact of the TPP on the Canadian economy would be a mere 0.068% growth in GDP by 2035. Perhaps even more interesting is that the study predicts only a 0.026% drop in GDP by 2035 if Canada does not ratify the TPP. This mirrors the recent US International Trade Commission’s study that showed that the TPP will increase the US trade deficit and will have almost no positive impact on the US economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report of Debates (Hansard)
    First Session, 42nd Parliament OFFICIAL REPORT OF DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday, April 12, 2021 Morning Sitting Issue No. 43 THE HONOURABLE RAJ CHOUHAN, SPEAKER ISSN 1499-2175 PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Entered Confederation July 20, 1871) LIEUTENANT-GOVERNOR Her Honour the Honourable Janet Austin, OBC First Session, 42nd Parliament SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Honourable Raj Chouhan EXECUTIVE COUNCIL Premier and President of the Executive Council ............................................................................................................... Hon. John Horgan Minister of Advanced Education and Skills Training...........................................................................................................Hon. Anne Kang Minister of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries......................................................................................................................Hon. Lana Popham Attorney General and Minister Responsible for Housing .............................................................................................Hon. David Eby, QC Minister of Children and Family Development ....................................................................................................................Hon. Mitzi Dean Minister of State for Child Care......................................................................................................................................Hon. Katrina Chen Minister of Citizens’ Services.....................................................................................................................................................Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaking Truth to Power II: What Is the Future For
    Where do we go from here? peaking STruth to Power IIA Treaty Forum 203 – 1155 W. Pender St., Vancouver, B.C. V6E 2P4. Tel 604 482 9200. Fax 604 482 9222. [email protected]. www.bctreaty.net Q How can we recognize aboriginal rights and reconcile them with the rights of others? Where do we go from here? Speaking Truth to Power II Contents 1 Introduction 2 Speaker biographies 3 Review of the Treaty Process Miles Richardson 7 With Rights come Responsibilities Milton Wong 10 Citizens Plus: A Roadmap to the Future Alan Cairns 16 Nation-Building and the Treaty Process Stephen Cornell 23 Summary of Responses 29 Open Space Summary 30 Participant list i Introduction Talking about Treaties . In March 2000, the Treaty Commission and the Law Commission of Canada harnessed the “brain power” of leading scholars in law, philosophy, political science and public administration to get people thinking about the future of treaty making in British Columbia. The two-day treaty forum — Speaking Truth to Power — brought together aboriginal and non-aboriginal people, business people and government, academics and opinion leaders to explore new paths towards the successful conclusion of treaties. Building upon the momentum generated by Truth I, the Treaty Commission hosted Truth II — a two-day treaty forum focused exclusively on finding solutions. In addition to plenary presentations and open discussion, Truth II offered small working group sessions to tackle specific issues (see page 29 for a summary of the Open Space Sessions). In this capacity, participants had the opportunity to hash out real-world issues, share ideas and come up with constructive solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • PART 2 January 2020
    PART 2 JANUARY 2020 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Tax reform is more urgent and necessary than ever. During the 2019 federal election, the Liberals promised a comprehensive public review of tax breaks, in an effort to make Canada’s tax system more fair. Tax loopholes in Canada’s tax system contribute to gross inequities, providing wealthy Canadians with tax schemes that allow them to avoid paying their fair share. These tax loopholes directly contribute to growing inequality in Canada, allowing the rich to get richer, while those with low to middle incomes are left behind. In 2015, the Liberals won a majority government, committing to a review of tax expenditures and cancelling tax breaks for the wealthy — specifically the stock option loophole and for private corporations. Since then, the Liberal government has only made modest changes to improve our tax system, leaving some of Canada’s worst tax loopholes open. Present day conversations about taxes have now evolved to highlight unfair tax breaks for foriegn-based e-commerce corporations and the lack of taxes paid for extreme wealth held by Canada’s richest. Closing just a few of the most regressive tax loopholes would generate at least $16 billion annually1 while implementing a 1% tax on wealth over $20 million would raise $70 billion over 10 years, according to estimates by the Parliamentary Budget Officer.2 These additional billions could help fund programs that would make life much more affordable for Canadians, such as access to housing and healthcare. Fair taxation can help us build a country where everyone prospers. The political climate is promising in this newly elected Liberal-minority parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral District Candidate Ballot Name Affiliation Email Abbotsford-Mission Aeriol Alderking Christian Heritage Party of [email protected]
    Electoral District Candidate Ballot Name Affiliation Email Abbotsford-Mission Aeriol Alderking Christian Heritage Party of [email protected]. Abbotsford-Mission Pam Alexis BC NDP [email protected] Abbotsford-Mission Stephen Fowler BC Green Party [email protected] Abbotsford-Mission Simon Gibson BC Liberal Party [email protected] Abbotsford-Mission Trevor Hamilton Conservative [email protected] Abbotsford South Bruce Banman BC Liberal Party [email protected] Abbotsford South Aird Flavelle BC Green Party [email protected] Abbotsford South Inder Johal BC NDP [email protected] Abbotsford South Laura-Lynn Thompson Christian Heritage Party of [email protected]. Abbotsford West Michael de Jong BC Liberal Party [email protected] Abbotsford West Kevin Eastwood BC Green Party [email protected] Abbotsford West Sukhi Gill B.C. Vision [email protected] Abbotsford West Michael Henshall Conservative Abbotsford West Preet Rai BC NDP [email protected] Boundary-Similkameen Arlyn Greig Wexit BC Boundary-Similkameen Roly Russell BC NDP [email protected]; [email protected] Boundary-Similkameen Darryl Seres Conservative [email protected] Boundary-Similkameen Petra Veintimilla BC Liberal Party [email protected] Burnaby-Deer Lake Glynnis Hoi Sum Chan BC Liberal Party [email protected] Burnaby-Deer Lake Mehreen Chaudry BC Green Party [email protected] Burnaby-Deer Lake Anne Kang BC NDP [email protected] Burnaby-Edmonds Tripat Atwal BC Liberal
    [Show full text]
  • More Opportunities to Join a Labour Election Canvass
    BULLETIN More opportunities to join a labour election canvass October 1, 2015 The Canadian Labour Congress and local labour councils around the province are organizing more opportunities for union members to canvass for federal election candidates. This is a great way to get involved in the election. Join members from other unions for a few hours to talk with people in your community, and help elect the candidate labour is supporting in your area. Interested members should contact the campaigns listed below for details. Canadian Labour Congress Pacific Region Federal Election 2015 Labour Canvass Date Labour Council Location Thursday, Oct. 1 Victoria Labour Council Cowichan – Malahat – Langford 5:30pm Alistair MacGregor #104 – 2806 Jacklin Road Langford, B.C. 778-265-3383 Saturday, Oct. 3 New Westminster and District Port Moody – Coquitlam 10:30am - 2:30pm Labour Council Fin Donnelly #1 – 2565 Barnet Highway Coquitlam, B.C. 604-474-2882 Saturday, Oct. 3 Victoria Labour Council Esquimalt – Saanich – Sooke 10:30am Randall Garrison #C-3 – 100 Aldersmith Place Victoria, B.C. 778-676-4033 Sunday, Oct. 4 Vancouver and District Labour Vancouver Centre Noon – 4:00pm Council Constance Barnes #140 – 1265 Granville Street Vancouver, B.C. 604-428-8847 Sunday, Oct. 4 Vancouver and District Labour Vancouver – Granville Noon – 4:00pm Council Mira Oreck 1308 West Broadway Vancouver, B.C. V6H 1H2 604-428-4850 Sunday, Oct. 4 New Westminster and District Surrey – Newton 10:30am - 2:30pm Labour Council Jinny Sims #210 – 7093 King George Blvd Surrey, B.C. V3W 5A2 778-565-8724 Sunday, Oct. 4 New Westminster and District Fleetwood – Port Kells 10:30am - 2:30pm Labour Council Garry Begg #101A – 15355 Fraser Highway Surrey, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin-Lawrence-Friedland-Fonds.Pdf
    University of Toronto Archives and Record Management Services Finding Aids – Martin L. Friedland fonds Contains the following accessions: B1998-0006 (pp. 2-149) B2002-0022 (pp. 150-248) B2002-0023 (pp 249-280) B2008-0033 and B2014-0020 (pp. 281-352) To navigate to a particular accession, use the bookmarks in the PDF file University of Toronto Archives Martin L. Friedland Personal Records Finding Aid November 1998 Accession No. B1998–0006 Prepared by Martin L. Friedland With revisions by Harold Averill University of Toronto Archives Accession Number Provenance B1998-0006 Friedland, Martin L. Martin Lawrence Friedland – A biographical sketch Note: Reference should also be made to Friedland’s curriculum vitae and the address on his receiving the Molson Prize in 1995, both of which are appended to the end of the accompanying finding aid. Martin Friedland was born in Toronto in 1932. He was educated at the University of Toronto, in commerce and finance (BCom 1955) and law (LLB 1958), where he was the gold medallist in his graduating year. He continued his academic training at Cambridge University, from which he received his PhD in 1967. Dr. Friedland’s career has embraced several areas where he has utilized his knowledge of commerce and finance as well as of law. He has been a university professor and administrator, a shaper of public policy in Canada through his involvement with provincial and federal commissions, committees and task forces, and is an author of international standing. Dr. Friedland was called to the Ontario Bar in 1960. His contribution to the formation of public policy in Canada began with his earliest research, a study of gambling in Ontario (1961).
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Report Card
    Corporate Accountability for Canada’s Mining, Oil and Gas Sectors Abroad Parliamentary Report Card anadian extractive sector companies have a significant presence around the world, including in developing and emerging economies.1 Increasingly, Canadian companies’ overseas operations are associated with Ccredible accusations of human rights abuse- including forced labour, sexual violence and involuntary relocation. The Government of Canada has an important role to play in promoting corporate accountability and an obligation to ensure that Canadian companies respect international human and labour rights wherever they operate. This Parliamentary Report Card documents • the commitments made by Canadian federal political parties to adopt corporate accountability mechanisms in Canada and • the MP voting record on legislation to create an Ombudsman for the international extractive sector in Canada. 1VOTING RECORD: DOES YOUR MP SUPPORT THE CREATION OF AN EXTRACTIVE SECTOR OMBUDSMAN? (See a detailed breakdown of how MPs voted on the next pages) Second Reading Vote on Bill C-584, Extractive Sector Ombudsman Bill October 1, 2014 Voted in SUPPORT of the Ombudsman bill Voted AGAINST the Ombudsman bill Conservative Party: 0 Conservative Party: 149 New Democratic Party: 86 New Democratic Party: 0 Liberal Party: 34 Liberal Party: 0 Bloc Québécois: 2 Bloc Québécois: 0 Green Party: 2 Green Party: 0 Independent: 3 Independent: 1 1 For example, over half of the world’s mining and mineral exploration companies are headquartered in Canada, with operations
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Report of T. Murray Rankin, Q.C
    IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT AND THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES BETWEEN: WILLIAM RALPH CLAYTON, WILLIAM RICHARD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS CLAYTON AND DANIEL CLAYTON AND BILCON OF DELAWARE INC. Claimants AND: GOVERNMENT OF CANADA Respondent EXPERT REPORT OF T. MURRAY RANKIN, Q.C. 1 I. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 1. I was asked to undertake an independent analysis of the environmental assessment (“EA”) process that was followed with respect to an application by Bilcon of Delaware, Inc. (“Bilcon”) for project approval of a quarry and basalt loading facility to be established at Whites Point, located in Digby County, Nova Scotia. I was asked to consider the decision-making followed prior to, during and after the Joint Review Panel (“JRP”) process established by the Governments of Canada and Nova Scotia. 2. The specific question posed was whether the EA process that was followed, either considered in whole or in part, would be substantively unreasonable and/or procedurally unfair, as viewed through the lens of Canadian public law principles. In doing so, I compared the treatment afforded projects that might objectively be considered substantially similar to the Bilcon project, recognizing, of course, that no two projects are ever identical. It is a hallmark of the “rule of law” principle, which has been held to undergird Canadian constitutional law1, that as much as possible “like cases should be treated alike”. Prevailing notions of justice have long featured adherence to this fundamental principle.2 3. When broadly considered, the issue is whether those projects received better treatment in the application of the two Governments’ EA process when compared to the White Points Quarry (“WPQ”) project, and whether jurisdictional deficiencies arose during the process, including any lack of natural justice and procedural fairness, which would offend principles of Canadian public law.
    [Show full text]