DOCSLIB.ORG

News Release

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
News Release June 29, 2016 Standing Committee on International Trade 6th Floor 131 Queen Street House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 via email: [email protected] Dear Committee Members: In recent months, there has been a great deal of debate about the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) and what it means for Canada. The federal government has committed to a study of the agreement’s potential impacts on the Canadian economy; however, to date nothing has been made public, and we have been told no such study yet exists. How can the government possibly sign onto a massive international trade agreement without knowing the impacts it will have, or the potential consequences for the Canadian economy, the public and the environment? In fact, it would be irresponsible to proceed in this way. A genuine and independent economic impact analysis that considers all the implications of this agreement should be mandatory. Possibly one of the reasons for this failure to do an impact study is that the government knows full well that any benefits from the TPP will be marginal at best, while the damage done will be serious. A 2016 study from the C.D. Howe Institute predicts that the macroeconomic impact of the TPP on the Canadian economy would be a mere 0.068% growth in GDP by 2035. Perhaps even more interesting is that the study predicts only a 0.026% drop in GDP by 2035 if Canada does not ratify the TPP. This mirrors the recent US International Trade Commission’s study that showed that the TPP will increase the US trade deficit and will have almost no positive impact on the US economy. A Tufts University study shows that Canada will actually lose jobs if the TPP is put into effect, and that the problem of income inequality will be made worse. We do know there will undoubtedly be negative consequences if Canada chooses to ratify the TPP. Our experts have reviewed the agreement. We’ve looked at the results of previous free trade agreements Canada has signed. …/2 180 Columbia Street East Telephone 604-517-0994 / 800-663-2017 New Westminster BC V3L 0G7 Facsimile 604-515-8889 / 800-663-6119 hsabc.org 2 June 29, 2016 Standing Committee on International Trade The TPP really has very little to do with international trade in the traditional sense. Rather, it is about creating regulatory symmetry across countries and strengthening the rights of corporations. As a result, governments’ right to regulate would be constrained and the democratic voice of the Canadian people will be muted. It is clear that any of the proposed benefits of the TPP would be far outweighed by the negative impacts on the Canadian people, the economy and the environment. In light of these issues, the TPP is of great concern for the members of our union, a component of the National Union of Public and General Employees. Although the potential impact of the TPP on public and social services has not always been at the forefront of the popular debate, this is a huge concern--not only for public sector workers, but for the Canadian public at large. A primary reason for this is the negative list approach in the TPP. It means that all services and investments in Canada, including any future new public services, are subject to the agreement’s provisions unless specific reservations are negotiated. While Canada has negotiated a reservation for services that are deemed to serve a public purpose, the list of social services outlined in Annex II of the agreement is extremely limited. Not only does the list fail to include the variety of ancillary services that support the functioning of those identified, but any unanticipated services that are deemed to serve a public purpose in the future will not be protected by this reservation. This is compounded by the standstill and ratchet provisions of the TPP. The standstill provision requires governments to move only in the direction of greater conformity with the agreement (i.e. increased liberalization and privatization), while the ratchet provision prohibits governments from reversing any privatization efforts. Not only would this increase the likelihood of the privatization of public and social services, but it would create an irreversible trend. Significant privatization moves could not be reversed even if they proved to be dreadful mistakes. These aspects of the TPP effectively restrict the autonomy of Canadian governments and pose a threat to the protection of public and social services in Canada, as well as to the millions of Canadians employed in this sector. A primary concern for health care in particular is the impact that the TPP will have on the pharmaceutical industry. According to recent analyses conducted by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and by Health Canada itself, the TPP will contribute to an increase in the cost of pharmaceutical drugs in Canada, by over $1 billion per year according to some estimates. This would be the result of extending patent terms for pharmaceutical drugs under Chapter 18 (Intellectual Property) of the TPP. An increase in the already-high cost of pharmaceutical drugs would add to the costs of health care and would jeopardize the health of many Canadians, particularly low-income Canadians. Beyond pharmaceutical patents, the TPP’s Chapter 18 will reinforce intellectual property rights (IPRs) in general. By extending copyright terms to 70 years, the TPP will lengthen the amount of time before content enters into the public domain. According to extensive analysis by …/3 180 Columbia Street East Telephone 604-517-0994 / 800-663-2017 New Westminster BC V3L 0G7 Facsimile 604-515-8889 / 800-663-6119 hsabc.org 3 June 29, 2016 Standing Committee on International Trade University of Ottawa professor and Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-Commerce Law, Michael Geist, the TPP will also have a negative impact on Internet freedom and privacy protections for users. While Canada has negotiated some reservations to protect its cultural industries, these are relatively weak when it comes to the promotion and regulation of access to Canadian content. Furthermore, the exceptions around culture are consistent with US interests, and thus will favour its dominant entertainment industry. Not only will these aspects of the TPP have an economic impact on Canada’s cultural industries, but they limit cultural diversity as well. In all of these areas, the IPR provisions embody the ways in which the TPP will bring the rules and regulations in participating countries in line with those in the US. Although Canada has negotiated exceptions in the area of government procurement, including cultural industries as well as public utilities, social services, and public transit, these are not all- encompassing. According to an analysis by Dentons (2016), new commitments in the TPP will open up the area of government procurement in Canada to foreign competition and give participating countries, particularly the US, greater access to Canadian entities. In addition to this, the TPP extends to sub-national governments – provinces and cities - the requirement that governments and their entities must employ non-discriminatory treatment towards foreign suppliers of goods and services (Chapter 15). This will remove the right of Canadian governments and their entities to favour local suppliers or to implement local content requirements. In fact, the use of such mechanisms to foster local development is clearly prohibited in Article 15.4.6 of the TPP. Not only does this erode the decision-making and regulatory autonomy of Canadian governments, but it will affect the strength of the Canadian economy, including local jobs. The TPP has been sold by its proponents on the basis of increased trade and investment, a healthier economy, and more jobs as a result; however, this has been shown to be false. The already referred to 2016 study out of Tufts University predicts job losses (58,000 for Canada) and higher inequality in all participating countries. The agreement would create a “race to the bottom” globally, thus putting downward pressure on wages and reducing the labour share of income. The TPP has been touted as a trailblazer in the area of labour rights. The agreement identifies the participating countries’ commitments to uphold the rights outlined in the International Labour Organization (ILO) Declaration; however, the ILO provisions are not binding. As articulated in Chapter 19 of the TPP, states and employers are only required to comply with the labour laws and regulations in their own countries, however bad they are. The TPP would not result in any real improvements in working conditions or labour rights in the participating countries. The rights and working conditions for migrant workers in particular, such as the abuse of migrant worker programs by employers, are not addressed in the TPP. What the TPP does prioritize is easing the temporary entry of business persons into Canada. For example, according to the specific country requirements outlined in Chapter 12, Canada would be unable …/4 180 Columbia Street East Telephone 604-517-0994 / 800-663-2017 New Westminster BC V3L 0G7 Facsimile 604-515-8889 / 800-663-6119 hsabc.org 4 June 29, 2016 Standing Committee on International Trade to apply its Labour Market Impact Assessment for workers entering the country from TPP economies like Australia and Japan, and there would be an expansion of the “professionals and technicians” category to include more types of occupations. The investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism is perhaps the clearest embodiment of the ways in which the TPP prioritizes corporate rights while constraining both citizens and governments in their ability to respectively voice and protect the public interest. According to Chapter 9 (Investment) of the TPP, ISDS reinforces and protects corporate rights to the extent that corporations are able to effectively sue governments for alleged expropriation, discriminatory treatment or loss of potential profits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core 1..39 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 40e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 2 No 2 Thursday, March 4, 2010 Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES TABLING OF DOCUMENTS DÉPÔT DE DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Conformément à l'article 32(2) du Règlement, M. Lukiwski Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Chambre Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, des communes) dépose sur le Bureau, — Réponses du pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: gouvernement, conformément à l’article 36(8) du Règlement, aux pétitions suivantes : — Nos. 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, — nos 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, 402- 402-1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 402- 402-1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 and 402-1513 1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 et 402-1513 au sujet du concerning the Employment Insurance Program. — Sessional régime d'assurance-emploi. — Document parlementaire no 8545- Paper No. 8545-403-1-01; 403-1-01; — Nos. 402-1129, 402-1174 and 402-1268 concerning national — nos 402-1129, 402-1174 et 402-1268 au sujet des parcs parks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-2-01; nationaux. — Document parlementaire no 8545-403-2-01; — Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • ONLINE INCIVILITY and ABUSE in CANADIAN POLITICS Chris
    ONLINE INCIVILITY AND ABUSE IN CANADIAN POLITICS Chris Tenove Heidi Tworek TROLLED ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL ONLINE INCIVILITY AND ABUSE IN CANADIAN POLITICS CHRIS TENOVE • HEIDI TWOREK COPYRIGHT Copyright © 2020 Chris Tenove; Heidi Tworek; Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. CITATION Tenove, Chris, and Heidi Tworek (2020) Trolled on the Campaign Trail: Online Incivility and Abuse in Canadian Politics. Vancouver: Centre for the Study of Democratic Institutions, University of British Columbia. CONTACT DETAILS Chris Tenove, [email protected] (Corresponding author) Heidi Tworek, [email protected] CONTENTS AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES ..................................................................................................................1 RESEARCHERS ...............................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................5 FACING INCIVILITY IN #ELXN43 ....................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Dealing with Crisis
    Briefing on the New Parliament December 12, 2019 CONFIDENTIAL – FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Regional Seat 8 6 ON largely Flip from NDP to Distribution static 33 36 Bloc Liberals pushed out 10 32 Minor changes in Battleground B.C. 16 Liberals lose the Maritimes Goodale 1 12 1 1 2 80 10 1 1 79 1 14 11 3 1 5 4 10 17 40 35 29 33 32 15 21 26 17 11 4 8 4 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 BC AB MB/SK ON QC AC Other 2 Seats in the House Other *As of December 5, 2019 3 Challenges & opportunities of minority government 4 Minority Parliament In a minority government, Trudeau and the Liberals face a unique set of challenges • Stable, for now • Campaign driven by consumer issues continues 5 Minority Parliament • Volatile and highly partisan • Scaled back agenda • The budget is key • Regulation instead of legislation • Advocacy more complicated • House committee wild cards • “Weaponized” Private Members’ Bills (PMBs) 6 Kitchen Table Issues and Other Priorities • Taxes • Affordability • Cost of Living • Healthcare Costs • Deficits • Climate Change • Indigenous Issues • Gender Equality 7 National Unity Prairies and the West Québéc 8 Federal Fiscal Outlook • Parliamentary Budget Officer’s most recent forecast has downgraded predicted growth for the economy • The Liberal platform costing projected adding $31.5 billion in new debt over the next four years 9 The Conservatives • Campaigned on cutting regulatory burden, review of “corporate welfare” • Mr. Scheer called a special caucus meeting on December 12 where he announced he was stepping
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental
    Back to normal is still a long way off Gwynne Dyer p. 12 What now of the Michael environmental Harris movement in Canada? p.11 Phil Gurski p. 11 Some MPs donating their salary increases to charities p. 4 THIRTY-FIRST YEAR, NO. 1718 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER MONDAY, APRIL 13, 2020 $5.00 News Remote caucus meetings Analysis Feds’ response Analysis: Did In the time of the pandemic, the feds flip- flop on closing Liberals holding national caucus the border or wearing meetings seven days a week masks amid The Liberals' daily Liberals meetings start with the COVID-19 are using a an update for MPs on new developments outbreak? regular daily and the government's initiatives from BY PETER MAZEREEUW conference Deputy House Leader Kirsty Duncan, he federal government says call for their left, International science and expert advice is Trade Minister Mary T caucus behind its decision to shut the Ng, and Minister border to travellers and its chang- meetings. The of Middle Class ing advice on whether Canadians Prosperity Mona should wear masks amid the CO- Conservatives Fortier. Usually, VID-19 outbreak. While Canada’s a member of the are using top health official pointed to COVID-19 cabinet new science related to using face Zoom and committee, or masks, one expert says there is another cabinet no scientific evidence that could the New minister also joins have informed Canada’s decision them in updating Democrats to close its border on March 16. caucus members. “There is no science about The Hill Times are using whether it works to restrict all photographs by travel into a country,” said Steven GoToMeeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Fall 2015 CUPE
    NEW EXECUTIVE | LIBRARY SAFETY | FIGHTING BLINDNESS | PARAMEDICS WIN GOLD PUBLIC FALL 2015 EMPLOYEE OUR TIME HAS COME TOGETHER, WE CAN HELP ELECT CANADA’S FIRST NDP GOVERNMENT LEADINGUS MARK HANCOCK, PRESIDENT “Getting more people to exercise their right to vote is the first step to defeating the Conservatives and electing a truly progressive, NDP government for the first time in Canadian history." Voter turnout will make the difference OCTOBER 19: YOUR DATE WITH A BALLOT BOX — AND HISTORY I’m going to start this column with some math. Maybe not my strongest suit — anymore — but these numbers pretty much speak for themselves. 14 / 6,201 / 9.4 million / 1 OK, maybe these numbers need a little help speaking for ACTIVIST CHAMPION The right-wing government of themselves. Stephen Harper can be defeated if we all work together, 14: That’s how many seats Stephen Harper and the says retiring NDP MP Libby Davies (Vancouver East). Davies, seen here at Convention with Mark Hancock, Conservatives needed to gain in the 2011 election to win a received a standing ovation from delegates after a stirring majority government. video tribute to her decades of progressive activism. 6,201: That’s the total number of votes those 14 seats were won by. Of all the areas that Harper has cut, very few things make me 9.4 million: That’s the number of eligible Canadian voters who as angry as his treatment of our veterans. It’s one thing to send didn’t vote in 2011. our men and women in the armed forces off to war — whether we 1: That's how many elections we are from an NDP government.
    [Show full text]
  • Response to the Chief Electoral Officer`S Recommendations for Legislative Reforms Following the 40Th General Election
    RESPONSE TO THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER`S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LEGISLATIVE REFORMS FOLLOWING THE 40TH GENERAL ELECTION Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Joe Preston, M.P. Chair FEBRUARY 2012 41st PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]
  • October 9, 2020 Table of Contents
    October 9, 2020 Table of Contents Research No consensus on broad COVID-19 study during rst HESA meeting of current session INTERVIEW: Health minister Hajdu currently ‘not open to delaying’ drug pricing changes Upcoming Events Webinar: “Using Data to Make Public Health Decisions” Press Releases Intergovernmental Aairs Jack.org Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario Canadian Institutes of Health Research Indigenous Services Canada Statistics Canada The Royal Society of Canada October 9, 2020 RESEARCH No consensus on broad COVID-19 study during rst HESA meeting of current session RESEARCH EXCLUSIVE | OCTOBER 9, 2020 After two and a half hours of continuous debate on the merits of a broad COVID-19 study proposed by Conservative health critic Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill, Alta.), the health committee’s rst meeting was adjourned with no decisions made. Rempel Garner proposed the health committee (HESA) undertake a study to look at 17 different elements, including rapid, at-home testing; vaccine development; long-term care protocols within federal jurisdiction; the Public Health Agency of Canada ’s Global Public Health Intelligence Network; contact tracing protocol; and Canada’s level of preparedness for future pandemics. The motion also proposed that various ministers, including those for health, procurement and public safety, be required to appear before the committee separately for three hours each in order to answer questions about the government’s response to COVID-19. Rempel Garner’s motion was introduced after opposition members of the committee voted to adjourn the debate on a motion presented by Liberal MP and committee member Tony Van Bynen (Newmarket-Aurora, Ont.), who was calling for a study on the mental health impacts of COVID-19 on Canadians.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatives Trounce Liberals in Charity Hockey Match
    TWENTY-EIGHTH YEAR, NO. 1411 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2017 $5.00 Sweden Best The good, Ex-Hy’s isn’t the politicos bad of family bartender to follow problem, dynasties in shaking it up at trump, it’s on social America media politics Métropolitain Lisa Van Dusen, p. 10 Chelsea Nash, p. 6 Tim Powers, p. 11 Maureen McEwan, p. 15 News Government Spending Feds spent $33-million on Conservatives ads, axed stimulus promotion in fi rst year under Liberals trounce Liberals in BY PETER MAZEREEUW program, says a spokesperson for Infrastructure Minister The Liberal government won’t Amarjeet Sohi. be buying ads to promote its charity hockey match multibillion-dollar infrastructure Continued on page 17 News Public Service Feds set aside $545-million to fi nance new contracts reached with big unions BY MARCO VIGLIOTTI thousands of civil servants, though those without deals are After more than a year in signalling they won’t settle offi ce, the Liberal govern- until they get exactly what ment has reached tentative they want. agreements with several large Continued on page 18 bargaining units representing News Foreign Aff airs ‘We look like amateur hour’: ex-diplomats, opposition decry Dion’s dual appointment BY CHELSEA NASH Dion as ambassador to both the Good as gold: Conservative team captain and MP Gord Brown and his colleagues get ready for a friendly European Union and Germany. charity hockey match between Liberal and Conservative MPs on Feb. 16 at the Canadian Tire Centre. The Former Canadian diplo- “We look like amateur hour,” Conservatives won 9-3.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth Making, Juridification, and Parasitical Discourse: a Barthesian Semiotic Demystification of Canadian Political Discourse on Marijuana
    MYTH MAKING, JURIDIFICATION, AND PARASITICAL DISCOURSE: A BARTHESIAN SEMIOTIC DEMYSTIFICATION OF CANADIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE ON MARIJUANA DANIEL PIERRE-CHARLES CRÉPAULT Thesis submitted to the University of Ottawa in partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate in Philosophy degree in Criminology Department of Criminology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Daniel Pierre-Charles Crépault, Ottawa, Canada, 2019 ABSTRACT The legalization of marijuana in Canada represents a significant change in the course of Canadian drug policy. Using a semiotic approach based on the work of Roland Barthes, this dissertation explores marijuana’s signification within the House of Commons and Senate debates between 1891 and 2018. When examined through this conceptual lens, the ongoing parliamentary debates about marijuana over the last 127 years are revealed to be rife with what Barthes referred to as myths, ideas that have become so familiar that they cease to be recognized as constructions and appear innocent and natural. Exploring one such myth—the necessity of asserting “paternal power” over individuals deemed incapable of rational calculation—this dissertation demonstrates that the processes of political debate and law-making are also a complex “politics of signification” in which myths are continually being invoked, (re)produced, and (re)transmitted. The evolution of this myth is traced to the contemporary era and it is shown that recent attempts to criminalize, decriminalize, and legalize marijuana are indices of a process of juridification that is entrenching legal regulation into increasingly new areas of Canadian life in order to assert greater control over the consumption of marijuana and, importantly, over the risks that this activity has been semiologically associated with.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the House of Commons
    43rd PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION House of Commons Debates Official Report (Hansard) Volume 150 No. 092 Friday, April 30, 2021 Speaker: The Honourable Anthony Rota CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 6457 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, April 30, 2021 The House met at 10 a.m. Bibeau Bittle Blaikie Blair Blanchet Blanchette-Joncas Blaney (North Island—Powell River) Blois Boudrias Boulerice Prayer Bratina Brière Brunelle-Duceppe Cannings Carr Casey Chabot Chagger GOVERNMENT ORDERS Champagne Champoux Charbonneau Chen ● (1000) Cormier Dabrusin [English] Damoff Davies DeBellefeuille Desbiens WAYS AND MEANS Desilets Dhaliwal Dhillon Dong MOTION NO. 9 Drouin Dubourg Duclos Duguid Hon. Chrystia Freeland (Minister of Finance, Lib.) moved Duncan (Etobicoke North) Duvall that a ways and means motion to implement certain provisions of Dzerowicz Easter the budget tabled in Parliament on April 19, 2021 and other mea‐ Ehsassi El-Khoury sures be concurred in. Ellis Erskine-Smith Fergus Fillmore The Deputy Speaker: The question is on the motion. Finnigan Fisher Fonseca Fortier If a member of a recognized party present in the House wishes to Fortin Fragiskatos request either a recorded division or that the motion be adopted on Fraser Freeland division, I ask them to rise in their place and indicate it to the Chair. Fry Garneau Garrison Gaudreau The hon. member for Louis-Saint-Laurent. Gazan Gerretsen Gill Gould [Translation] Green Guilbeault Hajdu Hardie Mr. Gérard Deltell: Mr. Speaker, we request a recorded divi‐ Harris Holland sion. Housefather Hughes The Deputy Speaker: Call in the members. Hussen Hutchings Iacono Ien ● (1045) Jaczek Johns Joly Jones [English] Jordan Jowhari (The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the Julian Kelloway Khalid Khera following division:) Koutrakis Kusmierczyk (Division No.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Gazette, Part I
    EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke
    [Show full text]
  • Fraser Watershed Initiative
    FEBRUARY 2019 SITELINESLandscape Architecture in British Columbia Fraser Watershed Initiative Fraser Watershed Restoration Conference 2019 I Reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples and Mother Earth I A Global Game Changer: What Restoration Means to Canada and the World I Restoring Terrestrial Habitat I Post-fire restoration and the need to address the risk from the next disturbance I The Heart of the Fraser I Protecting the Lower Fraser River I LACF Update 450–355 Burrard St. Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 T 604.682.5610 TF 855.682.5610 (Canada and US) E [email protected] I [email protected] W www.bcsla.org I www.sitelines.org PRESIDENT Stephen Vincent PRESIDENT ELECT Yolanda Leung PAST PRESIDENT Scott Watson REGISTRAR Jacqueline Lowe TREASURER Wai-Sue Louie DIRECTORS Debra Barnes Teri Cantin Katherine Dunster Illarion Gallant Liane McKenna Jordan McAuley The Fraser Canyon, Photo: cmh2315fl, Flickr Donna Rodman CSLA Representative Katherine Dunster BC Interior Chapter Chair Teri Cantin Vancouver Island Chapter Chair Illarion Gallant DIRECTORS (non-voting) BCSLA Intern/Associate Representative TBA FRASER WATERSHED Initiative By Justine Nelson, Coordinator University of BC Representative Susan Herrington Fraser Watershed Initiative BCSLA Student Representative Alix Tier Executive Director, BCSLA (Hon.) Tara Culham The Fraser Watershed Initiative (FWI) is a multi-year effort Sitelines is published six times per year; February, April, June, August, October, and November to restore the Fraser River, its tributaries and the land, by the British Columbia Society of Landscape Architects and is mailed to all BCSLA members, wildlife and people in this vast area. registered landscape architects, associates and affiliates. The editorial deadline is the 8th and is the longest remaining free-flowing river on the Pacific Coast of advertising is the 16th day of the intervening The Fraser River months.
    [Show full text]