Dawn Redwood, Living Fossil, Dinosaur-Age Tree: by Any Name, It’S Arnoldia’S Pick for Tree-Of-The-Century
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Growth and Colonization of Western Redcedar by Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Fumigated and Nonfumigated Nursery Beds
Tree Planter's Notes, Volume 42, No. 4 (1991) Growth and Colonization of Western Redcedar by Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizae in Fumigated and Nonfumigated Nursery Beds S. M. Berch, E. Deom, and T. Willingdon Assistant professor and research assistant, Department of Soil Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, and manager, Surrey Nursery, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Surrey, BC Western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn ex D. Don) VAM. Positive growth responses of up to 20 times the seedlings were grown in a bareroot nursery bed that had nonmycorrhizal controls occurred under conditions of limited been fumigated with methyl bromide. Seedlings grown in soil phosphorus. Incense-cedar, redwood, and giant sequoia fumigated beds were stunted and had purple foliage. seedlings in northern California nursery beds are routinely Microscopic examination showed that roots from these inoculated with Glomus sp. (Adams et al. 1990), as seedlings were poorly colonized by mycorrhizae, and only by experience has shown that the absence of VAM after soil fine vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. In contrast, roots from fumigation leads to phosphorus deficiency and poor growth. seedlings grown in non-fumigated beds had larger shoots and When western redcedars in fumigated transplant beds at green foliage and were highly colonized by both fine and the British Columbia Ministry of Forest's Surrey Nursery coarse vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae. Tree Planters' began to show signs of phosphorus deficiency, a deficiency Notes 42(4):14-16; 1991. of mycorrhizal colonization was suspected. Many studies have demonstrated improved P status of VAM-inoculated Species of cypress (Cupressaceae) and yew plants (see Harley and Smith 1983). -
Contributions to the Life-History of Tetraclinis Articu- Lata, Masters, with Some Notes on the Phylogeny of the Cupressoideae and Callitroideae
Contributions to the Life-history of Tetraclinis articu- lata, Masters, with some Notes on the Phylogeny of the Cupressoideae and Callitroideae. BY W. T. SAXTON, M.A., F.L.S., Professor of Botany at the Ahmedabad Institute of Science, India. With Plates XLIV-XLVI and nine Figures in the Text. INTRODUCTION. HE Gum Sandarach tree of Morocco and Algeria has been well known T to botanists from very early times. Some account of it is given by Hooker and Ball (20), who speak of the beauty and durability of the wood, and state that they consider the tree to be probably correctly identified with the Bvlov of the Odyssey (v. 60),1 and with the Ovlov and Ovia of Theo- phrastus (' Hist. PI.' v. 3, 7)/ as well as, undoubtedly, with the Citrus wood of the Romans. The largest trees met with by them, growing in an un- cultivated state, were about 30 feet high. The resin, known as sandarach, is stated to be collected by the Moors and exported to Europe, where it is used as a varnish. They quote Shaw (49 a and b) as having described and figured the tree under the name of Thuja articulata, in his ' Travels in Barbary'; this statement, however, is not accurate. In both editions of the work cited the plant is figured and described as ' Cupressus fructu quadri- valvi, foliis Equiseti instar articulatis '. Some interesting particulars of the use of the timber are given by Hansen (19), who also implies that the embryo has from three to six cotyledons. Both Hooker and Ball, and Hansen, followed by almost all others who have studied the plant, speak of it as Callitris qtiadrivalvis. -
Seiridium Canker of Cypress Trees in Arizona Jeff Schalau
ARIZONA COOPERATIVE E TENSION AZ1557 January 2012 Seiridium Canker of Cypress Trees in Arizona Jeff Schalau Introduction Leyland cypress (x Cupressocyparis leylandii) is a fast- growing evergreen that has been widely planted as a landscape specimen and along boundaries to create windbreaks or privacy screening in Arizona. The presence of Seiridium canker was confirmed in Prescott, Arizona in July 2011 and it is suspected that the disease occurs in other areas of the state. Seiridium canker was first identified in California’s San Joaquin Valley in 1928. Today, it can be found in Europe, Asia, New Zealand, Australia, South America and Africa on plants in the cypress family (Cupressaceae). Leyland cypress, Monterey cypress, (Cupressus macrocarpa) and Italian cypress (C. sempervirens) are highly susceptible and can be severely impacted by this disease. Since Leyland and Italian cypress have been widely planted in Arizona, it is imperative that Seiridium canker management strategies be applied and suitable resistant tree species be recommended for planting in the future. The Pathogen Seiridium canker is known to be caused by three different fungal species: Seiridium cardinale, S. cupressi and S. unicorne. S. cardinale is the most damaging of the three species and is SCHALAU found in California. S. unicorne and S. cupressi are found in the southeastern United States where the primary host is JEFF Leyland cypress. All three species produce asexual fruiting Figure 1. Leyland cypress tree with dead branch (upper left) and main leader bodies (acervuli) in cankers. The acervuli produce spores caused by Seiridium canker. (conidia) which spread by water, human activity (pruning and transport of infected plant material), and potentially insects, birds and animals to neighboring trees where new Symptoms and Signs infections can occur. -
Metasequoia Dawn Redwood a Truly Beautiful Tree
Metasequoia Dawn Redwood A Truly Beautiful Tree Metasequoia glyptostroboides is considered to be a living fossil as it is the only remaining species of a genus that was widespread in the geological past. In 1941 it was discovered in Hubei, China. In 1948 the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University sent an expedition to collect seed, which was distributed to universities and botanical gardens worldwide for growth trials. Seedlings were raised in New Zealand and trees can be seen in Christchurch Botanical Gardens, Eastwoodhill and Queens Gardens, Nelson. A number of natural Metasequoia populations exist in the wetlands and valleys of Lichuan County, Hubei, mostly as small groups. The largest contains 5400 trees. It is an excellent tall growing deciduous tree to complement evergreens in wetlands, stream edge plantings to control slips, and to prevent erosion in damp valley bottoms where other forestry trees fail to grow. Spring growth is a fresh bright green and in autumn the foliage turns a A fast growing deciduous conifer, red coppery brown making a great display. with a straight trunk, numerous It is also a most attractive winter branch silhouette. While the foliage is a similiar colour in autumn to that of swamp cypress (Taxodium), it is a branches and a tall conical crown, much taller erect growing tree, though both species thrive in moist soil growing to 45 metres in height and conditions. We import our seed from China and the uniformity of the seedling one metre in diameter. crop is most impressive. The timber has been used in boat building. Abies vejari 20 years old on left 14 years old on right Abies Silver Firs These dramatic conical shaped conifers make a great statement in the landscape, long-lived and withstanding the elements. -
Cupressaceae Calocedrus Decurrens Incense Cedar
Cupressaceae Calocedrus decurrens incense cedar Sight ID characteristics • scale leaves lustrous, decurrent, much longer than wide • laterals nearly enclosing facials • seed cone with 3 pairs of scale/bract and one central 11 NOTES AND SKETCHES 12 Cupressaceae Chamaecyparis lawsoniana Port Orford cedar Sight ID characteristics • scale leaves with glaucous bloom • tips of laterals on older stems diverging from branch (not always too obvious) • prominent white “x” pattern on underside of branchlets • globose seed cones with 6-8 peltate cone scales – no boss on apophysis 13 NOTES AND SKETCHES 14 Cupressaceae Chamaecyparis thyoides Atlantic white cedar Sight ID characteristics • branchlets slender, irregularly arranged (not in flattened sprays). • scale leaves blue-green with white margins, glandular on back • laterals with pointed, spreading tips, facials closely appressed • bark fibrous, ash-gray • globose seed cones 1/4, 4-5 scales, apophysis armed with central boss, blue/purple and glaucous when young, maturing in fall to red-brown 15 NOTES AND SKETCHES 16 Cupressaceae Callitropsis nootkatensis Alaska yellow cedar Sight ID characteristics • branchlets very droopy • scale leaves more or less glabrous – little glaucescence • globose seed cones with 6-8 peltate cone scales – prominent boss on apophysis • tips of laterals tightly appressed to stem (mostly) – even on older foliage (not always the best character!) 15 NOTES AND SKETCHES 16 Cupressaceae Taxodium distichum bald cypress Sight ID characteristics • buttressed trunks and knees • leaves -
Guideline 410 Prohibited Plant List
VENTURA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 165 DURLEY AVENUE CAMARILLO, CA 93010 www.vcfd.org Office: 805-389-9738 Fax: 805-388-4356 GUIDELINE 410 PROHIBITED PLANT LIST This list was first published by the VCFD in 2014. It has been updated as of April 2019. It is intended to provide a list of plants and trees that are not allowed within a new required defensible space (DS) or fuel modification zone (FMZ). It is highly recommended that these plants and trees be thinned and or removed from existing DS and FMZs. In certain instances, the Fire Department may require the thinning and or removal. This list was prepared by Hunt Research Corporation and Dudek & Associates, and reviewed by Scott Franklin Consulting Co, VCFD has added some plants and has removed plants only listed due to freezing hazard. Please see notes after the list of plants. For questions regarding this list, please contact the Fire Hazard reduction Program (FHRP) Unit at 085-389-9759 or [email protected] Prohibited plant list:Botanical Name Common Name Comment* Trees Abies species Fir F Acacia species (numerous) Acacia F, I Agonis juniperina Juniper Myrtle F Araucaria species (A. heterophylla, A. Araucaria (Norfolk Island Pine, Monkey F araucana, A. bidwillii) Puzzle Tree, Bunya Bunya) Callistemon species (C. citrinus, C. rosea, C. Bottlebrush (Lemon, Rose, Weeping) F viminalis) Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar F Casuarina cunninghamiana River She-Oak F Cedrus species (C. atlantica, C. deodara) Cedar (Atlas, Deodar) F Chamaecyparis species (numerous) False Cypress F Cinnamomum camphora Camphor F Cryptomeria japonica Japanese Cryptomeria F Cupressocyparis leylandii Leyland Cypress F Cupressus species (C. -
Mants Availability Shrubs
FooterDate Co ProdCategory BotPlant A2 Price1 Price2 Price3 Perennials 1 to 24 25 to 49 50 & Up Achellia fillipendulina 'Coronation Gold' 1 Gal 286.00 5.00 4.25 3.50 Achellia fillipendulina 'Coronation Gold' Flat 54.00 26.00 23.00 20.00 Achillea millefolium 'Strawberry Seduction' 1 Gal 10.00 5.00 4.25 3.50 Andropogon ternarius 1 Gal 1,422.00 5.50 4.75 4.00 Asclepias tuberosa 1 Gal 473.00 5.00 4.25 3.50 Asclepias tuberosa Flat 30.00 26.00 23.00 20.00 Aster novae-angliae 'Purple Dome' 1 Gal 1,314.00 5.00 4.25 3.50 Aster novae-angliae 'Purple Dome' Flat 34.00 26.00 23.00 20.00 Athyrium 'Ghost' 1 Gal 368.00 5.50 4.75 4.00 Calamagrostis sp. 1 Gal 242.00 5.50 4.75 4.00 Calamagrostis x acutiflora 'Karl Foerester' 3 Gal 598.00 10.75 9.50 8.25 Carex comans Marginata 'Snowline' 1 Gal 898.00 6.25 5.50 4.75 Carex hachijoensis 'Evergold' 1 Gal 926.00 6.25 5.50 4.75 Carex morrovii 'Ice Dance' 1 Gal 1,197.00 6.25 5.50 4.75 Carex pensylvanica 1 Gal 91.00 6.25 5.50 4.75 Chasmanthium latifolium 1 Gal 1,550.00 5.50 4.75 4.00 Convallaria majalis 1 Gal 17.00 5.50 4.75 4.00 Coreopsis 'Moonbeam' 1 Gal 1,326.00 5.00 4.25 3.50 Crocosmia x crocosmiiflora 'Emily McKenzie' 1 Gal 10.00 5.00 4.25 3.50 Dicentra spectabilis 3 Gal 21.00 13.50 12.00 10.00 Dryopteris marginalis 1 Gal 854.00 5.50 4.75 4.00 Echinacea 'Pow Wow White' 1 Gal 220.00 5.00 4.25 3.50 Echinacea 'Pow wow Wild Berry' 1 Gal 1,920.00 5.00 4.25 3.50 Echinacea 'Pow wow Wild Berry' 2 Gal 72.00 8.50 7.25 6.00 Echinacea 'Pow wow Wild Berry' Flat 9.00 26.00 23.00 20.00 Echinacea purpurea 1 Gal 125.00 5.00 -
Plant Palette - Trees 50’-0”
50’-0” 40’-0” 30’-0” 20’-0” 10’-0” Zelkova Serrata “Greenvase” Metasequoia glyptostroboides Cladrastis kentukea Chamaecyparis obtusa ‘Gracilis’ Ulmus parvifolia “Emer I” Green Vase Zelkova Dawn Redwood American Yellowwood Slender Hinoki Falsecypress Athena Classic Elm • Vase shape with upright arching branches • Narrow, conical shape • Horizontally layered, spreading form • Narrow conical shape • Broadly rounded, pendulous branches • Green foliage • Medium green, deciduous conifer foliage • Dark green foliage • Evergreen, light green foliage • Medium green, toothed leaves • Orange Fall foliage • Rusty orange Fall foliage • Orange to red Fall foliage • Evergreen, no Fall foliage change • Yellowish fall foliage Plant Palette - Trees 50’-0” 40’-0” 30’-0” 20’-0” 10’-0” Quercus coccinea Acer freemanii Cercidiphyllum japonicum Taxodium distichum Thuja plicata Scarlet Oak Autumn Blaze Maple Katsura Tree Bald Cyprus Western Red Cedar • Pyramidal, horizontal branches • Upright, broad oval shape • Pyramidal shape • Pyramidal shape, develops large flares at base • Pyramidal, buttressed base with lower branches • Long glossy green leaves • Medium green fall foliage • Bluish-green, heart-shaped foliage • Leaves are needle-like, green • Leaves green and scale-like • Scarlet red Fall foliage • Brilliant orange-red, long lasting Fall foliage • Soft apricot Fall foliage • Rich brown Fall foliage • Sharp-pointed cone scales Plant Palette - Trees 50’-0” 40’-0” 30’-0” 20’-0” 10’-0” Thuja plicata “Fastigiata” Sequoia sempervirens Davidia involucrata Hogan -
Tree Domestication and the History of Plantations - J.W
THE ROLE OF FOOD, AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES IN HUMAN NUTRITION – Vol. II - Tree Domestication and the History of Plantations - J.W. Turnbull TREE DOMESTICATION AND THE HISTORY OF PLANTATIONS J.W. Turnbull CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Canberra, Australia Keywords: Industrial plantations, protection forests, urban forestry, clonal forestry, forest management, tree harvesting, tree planting, monoculture, provenance, germplasm, silviculture, botanic gardens, arboreta, fuelwood, molecular biology, genetics, tropical rainforest, pulpwood, shelterbelts, rubber, pharmaceuticals, lumber, fruit trees, palm oil, Eucalyptus, farm forestry, dune stabilization, clear-cutting, religious ceremony Contents 1. Introduction 2. Origins of Planting 2.1. The Mediterranean Lands 2.2. Asia 3. Movement of Germplasm 3.1. Evidence of Early Transfers 3.2. Role of Botanic Gardens and Arboreta 3.3. Australian Tree Species and Their Transfer 3.4. North Asia as a Rich Source 4. Tree Domestication 4.1. Domestication by Indigenous Peoples 4.2. Selection and Breeding of Forest Trees 4.3. Forest Genetics 5. Plantations 6. Forest Plantations 1400–1900 6.1. European Experiences 6.2. Tropical Plantations 7. Plantations 1900–1950 8. Plantations 1950–2000 8.1. Global Overview 9. Protection Forests 10. Amenity Planting and Urban Forestry 11. Plantation Practices 11.1. TheUNESCO Mechanical Revolution – EOLSS 12. Sustainability of Plantations Glossary SAMPLE CHAPTERS Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Trees have been planted for thousands of years for food, wood, shelter, and religious purposes. The first woody plants to be cultivated were those yielding food, such as the olive. Trees were moved around the world by the Romans, Greeks, Chinese, and by others during military conquests. Voyages of discovery by European navigators to the ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) THE ROLE OF FOOD, AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES IN HUMAN NUTRITION – Vol. -
The Pine Genome Initiative- Science Plan Review
ProCoGen Training Workshop 2013 Umeå An Undiscovered Country: What Comparative Genomics Tells Us of Gymnosperm Genomes Ujwal R. Bagal, W. Walter Lorenz, Jeffrey F.D. Dean Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources & Institute of Bioinformatics University of Georgia Diverse Form and Life History JGI CSP - Conifer EST Project Transcriptome Assemblies Statistics Pinaceae Reads Contigs* • Pinus taeda 4,074,360 164,506 • Pinus palustris 542,503 44,975 • Pinus lambertiana 1,096,017 85,348 • Picea abies 623,144 36,867 • Cedrus atlantica 408,743 30,197 • Pseudotsuga menziesii 1,216,156 60,504 Other Conifer Families • Wollemia nobilis 471,719 35,814 • Cephalotaxus harringtonia 689,984 40,884 • Sequoia sempervirens 472,601 42,892 • Podocarpus macrophylla 584,579 36,624 • Sciadopitys verticillata 479,239 29,149 • Taxus baccata 398,037 33,142 *Assembled using MIRA http://ancangio.uga.edu/ng-genediscovery/conifer_dbMagic.jnlp Loblolly pine PAL amino acid sequence alignment Analysis Method Sequence Collection PlantTribe, PlantGDB, GenBank, Conifer DBMagic assemblies 25 taxa comprising of 71 sequences Phylogenetic analysis Maximum Likelihood: RAxML (Stamatakis et. al) Bayesian Method: MrBayes (Huelsenbeck, et al.) Tree reconciliation: NOTUNG 2.6 (Chen et al.) Phylogenetic Tree of Vascular Plant PALs Phylogenetic Analysis of Conifer PAL Gene Sequences Conifer-specific branch shown in green Amino Acids Under Relaxed Constraint Maximum Likelihood analysis Nested codon substitution models M0 : constant dN/dS ratio M2a : rate ratio ω1< 1, ω2=1 and ω3>1 M3 : (ω1< ω2< ω3) (M0, M2a, M3, M2a+S1, M2a+S2, M3+S1, M3+S2) Fitmodel version 0.5.3 ( Guindon et al. 2004) S1 : equal switching rates (alpha =beta) S2 : unequal switching rates (alpha ≠ beta) Variable gymnosperm PAL amino acid residues mapped onto a crystal structure for parsley PAL Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms Jiao et al. -
Aneides Vagrans Residing in the Canopy of Old-Growth Redwood Forest 1 1 1 James C
Herpetological Conservation and Biology 1(1):16-26 Submitted: June 15, 2006; Accepted: July 19, 2006 EVIDENCE OF A NEW NICHE FOR A NORTH AMERICAN SALAMANDER: ANEIDES VAGRANS RESIDING IN THE CANOPY OF OLD-GROWTH REDWOOD FOREST 1 1 1 JAMES C. SPICKLER , STEPHEN C. SILLETT , SHARYN B. MARKS , 2,3 AND HARTWELL H. WELSH, JR. 1Department of Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521, USA 2Redwood Sciences Laboratory, USDA Forest Service, 1700 Bayview Drive, Arcata, CA 95521, USA 3Corresponding Author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—We investigated habitat use and movements of the wandering salamander, Aneides vagrans, in an old-growth forest canopy. We conducted a mark-recapture study of salamanders in the crowns of five large redwoods (Sequoia sempervirens) in Prairie Creek Redwoods State Park, California. This represented a first attempt to document the residency and behavior of A. vagrans in a canopy environment. We placed litter bags on 65 fern (Polypodium scouleri) mats, covering 10% of their total surface area in each tree. Also, we set cover boards on one fern mat in each of two trees. We checked cover objects 2–4 times per month during fall and winter seasons. We marked 40 individuals with elastomer tags and recaptured 13. Only one recaptured salamander moved (vertically 7 m) from its original point of capture. We compared habitats associated with salamander captures using correlation analysis and stepwise regression. At the tree-level, the best predictor of salamander abundance was water storage by fern mats. At the fern mat-level, the presence of cover boards accounted for 85% of the variability observed in captures. -
The Taxonomic Position and the Scientific Name of the Big Tree Known As Sequoia Gigantea
The Taxonomic Position and the Scientific Name of the Big Tree known as Sequoia gigantea HAROLD ST. JOHN and ROBERT W. KRAUSS l FOR NEARLY A CENTURY it has been cus ing psychological document, but its major,ity tomary to classify the big tree as Sequoia gigan vote does not settle either the taxonomy or tea Dcne., placing it in the same genus with the nomenclature of the big tree. No more the only other living species, Sequoia semper does the fact that "the National Park Service, virens (Lamb.) End!., the redwood. Both the which has almost exclusive custodY of this taxonomic placement and the nomenclature tree, has formally adopted the name Sequoia are now at issue. Buchholz (1939: 536) pro gigantea for it" (Dayton, 1943: 210) settle posed that the big tree be considered a dis the question. tinct genus, and he renamed the tree Sequoia The first issue is the generic status of the dendron giganteum (Lind!.) Buchholz. This trees. Though the two species \differ con dassification was not kindly received. Later, spicuously in foliage and in cone structure, to obtain the consensus of the Calif.ornian these differences have long been generally botanists, Dayton (1943: 209-219) sent them considered ofspecific and notofgeneric value. a questionnaire, then reported on and sum Sequoiadendron, when described by Buchholz, marized their replies. Of the 29 answering, was carefully documented, and his tabular 24 preferred the name Sequoia gigantea. Many comparison contains an impressive total of of the passages quoted show that these were combined generic and specific characters for preferences based on old custom or sentiment, his monotypic genus.