Ciencia, Política Y Poder. Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin Y

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ciencia, Política Y Poder. Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin Y José Manuel Sánchez Ron Ciencia, política y poder Napoleón, Hitler, Stalin y Eisenhower José Manuel Sánchez Ron Napoleón, Hitler, Stalin y Eisenhower Stalin Napoleón, Hitler, Ciencia, política y poder www.fbbva.es Conferencias Magistrales Conferencias Magistrales CIENCIA, POLÍTICA Y PODER NAPOLEÓN, HITLER, STALIN Y EISENHOWER Ciencia, política y poder Napoleón, Hitler, Stalin y Eisenhower José Manuel Sánchez Ron DATOS INTERNACIONALES DE CATALOGACIÓN Sánchez Ron, José Manuel Ciencia, política y poder : Napoleón, Hitler, Stalin y Eisenhower / José Manuel Sánchez Ron. — Bilbao : Fundación BBVA, 2010. 262 p. ; 24 cm ISBN: 978-84-96515-99-4 1. Historia 2. Conocimiento científico I. Sánchez Ron, José Manuel II. Fundación BBVA, ed. 165.9 Primera edición, enero 2010 © José Manuel Sánchez Ron, 2010 © Fundación BBVA, 2010 Plaza de San Nicolás, 4. 48005 Bilbao www.fbbva.es [email protected] IMAGEN DE CUBIERTA © Eduardo Núñez Valbuena, 2010 Universo del poder, 2009 Al publicar la presente Conferencia Magistral, la Fundación BBVA no asume responsabilidad alguna sobre su contenido ni sobre la inclusión en la misma de documentos o información complementaria facilitada por el autor. EDICIÓN Y PRODUCCIÓN: Rubes Editorial ISBN: 978-84-96515-99-4 Depósito legal: B-3869-2010 Impreso en España – Printed in Spain Impreso por Valant 2003 sobre papel con un 100% de fibras recicladas y elaborado según las más exigentes normas ambientales europeas. Índice Introducción ........................................................................................................ 9 1 Ciencia y poder: «Primero el poder, después los detalles» .......... 13 1.1 ¿Dónde reside el poder? Tres ejemplos: Tycho Brahe, Niels Bohr y Andréi Sajarov ..................................................................... 17 1.2 La atracción del poder: el ejemplo de Descartes .................................. 27 1.3 Galileo y los poderes político, religioso y disciplinar .......................... 30 2 Napoleón y el «imperio del genio» ....................................................... 39 2.1 El Instituto de Francia ............................................................................. 45 2.2 La ciencia francesa en la época de Napoleón ...................................... 47 2.3 La École Polytechnique ............................................................................. 50 2.4 La ciencia y el poder: las campañas de Napoleón en Italia y Egipto ....................................................................................................... 55 2.5 El Instituto de Egipto ............................................................................... 59 2.6 La Description de l’Égypte ............................................................................ 64 2.7 Un fracaso bien recompensado .............................................................. 67 2.8 La Société d’Arcueil ................................................................................. 74 2.9 Honores a científicos extranjeros: Volta y Davy ................................... 77 2.10 Las servidumbres de la política: ciencia versus religión ....................... 83 2.11 Napoleón y la ciencia francesa de su tiempo: una valoración final .................................................................................. 85 2.12 Epílogo: Chateaubriand sobre Napoléon .............................................. 87 3 Hitler, heredero de un imperio científico ......................................... 89 3.1 Purgas y emigraciones científicas ........................................................... 95 3.2 Ciencia «alemana» (Deutsche Wissenschaft) .............................................. 106 7 CIENCIA, POLÍTICA Y PODER. NAPOLEÓN, HITLER, STALIN Y EISENHOWER 3.3 El oportunismo de los científicos: el caso de la biología .................... 111 3.4 De Robert Merton a Samuel Gouldsmit: ciencia, democracia y dictaduras políticas a propósito de la energía nuclear ..................... 114 3.5 Von Braun y su «nuevo Napoleón»: Adolf Hitler ................................. 126 3.6 Epílogo moral ........................................................................................... 135 4 Stalin: el corifeo de la ciencia soviética .............................................. 143 4.1 El papel de la ciencia en la teoría marxista ......................................... 144 4.2 Stalin, la ciencia y los científicos soviéticos ........................................... 151 4.3 Bombas atómicas para la Unión Soviética ............................................. 158 4.4 Biología e ideología: el caso Lisenko ..................................................... 173 5 Eisenhower: ciencia, democracia y Guerra Fría .............................. 179 5.1 Eisenhower y su educación atómica ....................................................... 183 5.2 Interludio: el papel de los científicos en el control de la energía nuclear en 1945-1946 ............................................................................... 186 5.3 Eisenhower y el lanzamiento de las bombas atómicas de 1945 .......... 193 5.4 Eisenhower y la energía nuclear: los años de la Presidencia .............. 195 5.5 Investigación básica versus aplicada ........................................................ 204 5.6 La Unión Soviética toma la delantera: el Sputnik y sus consecuencias .................................................................................. 211 5.7 Una nueva agencia espacial: la NASA ..................................................... 223 5.8 La física de altas energías ........................................................................ 228 5.9 El adiós de Eisenhower ............................................................................ 240 5.10 Epílogo ....................................................................................................... 247 Bibliografía ........................................................................................................... 251 Índice de ilustraciones ..................................................................................... 257 Nota sobre el autor ........................................................................................... 261 8 Introducción l presente libro constituye una versión sustancialmente amplia- da de las conferencias que dicté en la Fundación BBVA los E días 15, 16 y 17 de noviembre de 2005, dentro del ciclo de Conferencias Magistrales que organizó esta institución. Además de ampliar el contenido del texto que utilicé en cada una de mis tres in- tervenciones, y de convertir en dos capítulos lo que inicialmente fue una de las conferencias (la dedicada a Hitler y a Stalin), he añadido un primer capítulo introductorio en el que expongo algunas ideas generales sobre las relaciones entre la ciencia y el poder político. Quiero agradecer a la Fundación BBVA y muy en particular a su director, el profesor Rafael Pardo Avellaneda, su invitación, así como su paciencia y comprensión ante mi demora en entregar el texto defi- nitivo. En mi descargo querría decir que tal retraso se debe al deseo de presentar a la Fundación un texto que fuera más allá de lo que expuse en mis conferencias de 2005 y de lo que ya he escrito en otras obras mías, especialmente en El poder de la ciencia. Espero haberlo con- seguido; ciertamente, el tema lo merece por su importancia. Por último, quiero agradecer a dos queridos amigos y maestros en el arte del bien pensar, Miguel Artola y Gonzalo Pontón, que tuvieron la amabilidad de realizar las presentaciones de dos de mis conferen- cias. Sus generosas palabras de entonces me animan a esforzarme para hacerlas realidad. 9 Si los hombres de ciencia no nos deben nada, nosotros sí tenemos muchas cosas esenciales que aprender de ellos. Nos pueden enseñar a verificar una prueba, a asegurarnos de la profundidad y exactitud de un razonamiento, y a cómo controlar y emplear con seguridad una hipótesis y una analogía. Son ellos los que poseen el secreto de las misteriosas propiedades del intelecto, mediante las que el error sirve a la verdad, y la verdad prevalece lenta, pero inexorablemente. Suya es la lógica del descubrimiento, la demostración del avance de las ideas, que son las leyes del progreso y la llama vital de la historia, y que, como las necesidades terrenales y las pasiones del hombre, permanecen casi inalterables. A menudo nos proporcionan consejos inestimables, aun cuando traten de su propia materia y se dirijan a su propia gente. Lord Acton (1834-1902), conferencia inaugural como nuevo Regius Professor de Historia Moderna de la Universidad de Cambridge, 11 de junio de 1895 (ACTON 1999, 27-28) 11 1 Ciencia y poder: «Primero el poder, después los detalles» Los científicos deberían ser capaces de formar una organización política, pero para ello es preciso ser algo más que un experto en algo. No es sólo cuestión de organización, debe existir un programa definido. Incluso si nuestras ambiciones políticas son más que vagas. Estamos diciendo siempre, igual que solía decir Hitler: «Primero el poder, después los detalles», pero en realidad no tenemos planes concretos claros. Karl WIRTZ, 25 de noviembre de 1945, en Farm Hall1 l fin último de la ciencia es comprender la naturaleza, o me- jor, el universo puesto que eso que los humanos llamamos E naturaleza no es sino una minúscula parte, localizada en un pequeño planeta. La ciencia pretende saber cómo es y qué sucede en ese universo, buscando para ello leyes —cuanto más generales, me- jor— a las que obedecen los fenómenos que
Recommended publications
  • April 20, NOTE
    PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS in the V.XECUTIVE BRANCH Appointed January 20 - April 20, 1953 NOTE: This list is limited to appointments made after January 20, 1953. Names con- tained herein replace corre- sponding names appearing in the 1952-53 U.S. Government Organization Manual. Federal Register Division National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington 25, D. C. MEMBERS OF THE CABINET TEE PRESIDENT John Foster Dulles, of New York, Secretary of State. President of the United States.-- Dwight D. Eisenhower George M. Humphrey, of Ohio, Secre- tary of the Treasury. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT Charles Erwin Wilson, of Michigan, Secretary of Defense. The White House Office Herbert Brownell, Jr., of New York, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW. Attorney General. NAtional 8-1414 Arthur E. Summerfield, of Michigan, The Assistant to the President.-- Postmaster General. Sherman Adams Assistant to The Assistant to the Douglas McKay, of Oregon, Secretary President.--Maxwell M. Rabb of the Interior. Special Assistant to The Assistant to the President.--Roger Steffan Ezra Taft Benson, of Utah, Secretary Special Assistant to The Assistant of Agriculture. to the President.--Charles F. Willis, Jr. Sinclair Weeks, of Massachusetts, Special Assistants in the White Secretary of Commerce Haase Office: L. Arthur Minnich, Jr. Martin P. Durkin, of Maryland, James M. Lambie Secretary of Labor. Special Counsel to the President (Acting Secretary).--Thomas E. Mrs. Oveta Culp Hobby, of Texas, Stephens Secretary of Health, Education, Secretary to the President (Press).-- and Welfare James C. Hagerty Assistant Press Secretary.--Murray Snyder Acting Special Counsel to the Presi- For sale by the dent.--Bernard M.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE DECEMBER 18 Mr
    16682 CONGRESSIO~AL RECORD-SENATE DECEMBER 18 Mr. DOUGHTON: Committee on Ways and tain property to be maintained by such city THE JOURNAL . Means. House Joint Resolution 553. Joint as an air-raid shelter during emergencies resolution amending chapter 26 of the In­ with the need therefor, and for other public On the request of Mr. LucAs, and by ternal Revenue Code; without amendment and municipal purposes at all other times; unanimous consent, the reading of the (Rept. No. 3199). Referred to the Commit.. to the Committee on Public Works. Journal of the proceedings of Friday, tee of the Whole House on the State· of the By Mr. LARCADE: December 15, 1950, was dispensed with. Union. H. J. Res. 552. Joint resoluti'on to amend MESSAGES FROM THE .PRESIDENT Mr. DOUGHTON: Committee on Ways and section 402 of the Defense Production Act Means. House Joint Resolution 554. Joint so as to require that if price or wage con­ Messages in writing from the Presi­ resolution amending section 3804 of the In­ trols are exercised under that section, they dent of the United States submitting ternal Revenue Code; without amendment be exercised for prices and wages generally (Rept. No. 3200). Referred to the Commit- nominations were communicated to the and ceilings be set at the leve1s prevailing Senate by Mr. Miller, one of his secre- -tee of the Whole House on the State of the from May 24, 1950, to June 24, 1950; to the Union. · Committee. on Banking and Currency. taries. · Mr. CURTIS: Committee on Ways and By Mr. DOUGHTON: MESSAGE FROM THE HOUSE Means.
    [Show full text]
  • Military-Industrial Complex: Eisenhower's Unsolved Problem
    MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: EISENHOWER'S UNSOLVED PROBLEM by )/lrS THOMAS JENKINS BADGER Bo A., George Washington University., 1949 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted fn pa 1 ful 111b nt of the .'_-. -.- ... — -\-C MASTER OF ARTS Department of Political Science KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1965 Approved by: ~ Major Professor XOOl 1105 6<3 ACKHQWLEOGEMENT TO: Dr. Louis Douglas for suggesting the subject, offering continuous encouragement and valuable advice, and insisting upon a measure of scholar- ship. Or. Robin Higham for reading the manuscript, professional advice and suggestions. Dr. Joseph Hajda, who as the Major Professor, was responsible for the thesis and who tirelessly read and reread drafts, and who patiently pointed out weaknesses needing amplification, correction, or deletion. It Is not Intended to Indicate that these gentlemen concur with the entire thesis. They don't. The errors and misconceptions In the thesis are mine as well as the conclusions but without their assistance the thesis would be unacceptable as a scholarly work. If I could have followed their advice more Intelligently the thesis would be considerably Improved, but whatever merit this work may have the credit belongs to them. CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION of the United One hundred and sixty-eight years ago, the first President had served so States presented his farewell address to the country which he from a divided well and which he, as much as any other person, had changed Washington's group of self-oriented states Into a cohesive nation. George permanent alliances principal advice to this young nation was to stay clear of west to settle} with foreign nations.
    [Show full text]
  • Saqueo De Bolivia Buenov555.Qxd
    BLANCO BLANCO El Nuevo O rden M undial y el SAQUEO de Bolivia 3 Colectivo SUR El Nuevo O rden M undial y el SAQUEO de Bolivia Diciembre del 2006 Ediciones SOMOS SUR BOLIVIA El Nuevo Orden Mundial y el SAQUEO de Bolivia Autor: Colectivo SUR Diciembre del 2006 Coordinacin: Maria Lohman Revisin: JosØ Luis Gareca Acuarela Contratapa: Despojo de JosØ Rodriguez S. Editores: SOMOS SUR - Un esp acio alternativo de (in)formacin Casilla 2444 Telf. 4247558 www.somossur.net - [email protected] Cochabamba Bolivia Depsito Legal: 2-1-2071-06 Diagramado: J. Marcelo Pozo F. La reproduccin tot al o p arcial de este libro es autorizada por los editores, mencionando siempre la fuente; ademÆs cualquier aporte serÆ muy bien recibido con miras a la publicacin de los siguientes tirajes. En homenaje a Marcelo Quiroga Santa Cruz Sergio AlmarÆz y todos quienes en el anonimato buscan un ORDEN mundial al servicio de los pueblos INDICE PROLOGO .................................................................... 13 INTRODUCCION............................................................ 17 CAPITULO I: Plutocracias vs. pueblos ...................... 25 Melgarejo: Complacencia con inversionist as chilenos 38 1870-1879: Seis gobiernos y un asesinato, preludio de una guerra anunciada ........................................................ 41 1880-1899: Empresarios mineros transnacionales aseguran dos dØcadas de estabilidad poltica en Bolivia 45 La familia de W illiam Russell Grace, una larga historia de saqueadores ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Papers of Governor Lawrence W. Wetherby, 1950-1955
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Legislative and Executive Papers Political Science 12-31-1983 The Public Papers of Governor Lawrence W. Wetherby, 1950-1955 Lawrence W. Wetherby John E. Kleber Morehead State University Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Wetherby, Lawrence W. and Kleber, John E., "The Public Papers of Governor Lawrence W. Wetherby, 1950-1955" (1983). Legislative and Executive Papers. 8. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_science_papers/8 THE PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE GOVERNORS OF KENTUCKY Robert F. Sexton General Editor SPONSORED BY THE Kentucky Advisory Commission on Public Documents AND THE Kentucky Historical Society KENTUCKY ADVISORY COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DOCUMENTS William Buster Henry E. Cheaney Thomas D. Clark, Chairman Leonard Curry Richard Drake Kenneth Harrell Lowell H. Harrison James F. Hopkins Malcolm E. Jewell W. Landis Jones George W. Robinson Robert F. Sexton, General Editor W. Frank Steely Lewis Wallace John D. Wright, Jr. THE PUBLIC PAPERS OF GOVERNOR LAWRENCE W WETHERBY 1950-1955 John E. Kleber, Editor THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Wetherby, Lawrence W. (Lawrence Winchester), 190&- The Public papers of Governor Lawrence W. Wetherby, 1950-1955. (The Public papers of the Governors of Kentucky) Includes index. 1. Kentucky—Politics and government—1951- —Sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the STATS B0A5D of A&Etctjltbeb April 17
    MINUTES OF THE-MBBTIBG- of the STATS B0A5D Of A&EtCTJLTBEB April 17 •' 1952 Presents Mr* Brody, Chairman? Messrs* Afcers» Muellerf Smith: Miss Jones; President Hannah, Compt- roller May and Secretary McDonel Absent: Mr. Armstrong; Dro Tburston The meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. The minutes of the previous meeting were approved* PB5SISSITT8S HBP05T I Resignations 1. Hesignation of Bobert X Davdy as Assistant in Civil Engineering, effective March 15* 1952* to Sesignations work in industry* I 2. Resignation of Mrs. Eloise Yallender, Secretary to the Administrative Assistant on Academic • Affairs, effective March 31f. 1952. j 3* Besignation of Edward M. Srickson as. Sfews. Writer, in Information Services, effective March 21? j 1952? to. accept a position with Van Patrick. ] k. Termination of the employment of Earl Patterson* Construction Superintendent? effective | March 31, 1952. * * | Leaves 1, Leave of absence with full pay for D. B. Tarner, Assistant Professor (Extension) of Agricultural! Economics* from March 16 to September 15* 1952s to complete the requirements for his Doctor's degree. i 2. Extension of leave of absence with pay for Olevia Meyer, Assistant Professor (Extension) of \ Some Ifenagement and Child Development 1 to March 31? 1952> for health reasons. " ! 3* Extension of leave of absence with full pay for Mrs, Suth A* Mack, Instructor in Music* to ! June-30» 1952> for health reasons* k. Leave of absence with half pay for Lucia Morgan, Assistant Professor of Speech, Dramatics* and \ I ; riadio Education, from April 1, 1952, to March 31* 1953» to continue studies for the doctor's degree at Louisiana State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Policymaking, Environmental Science, and the Nuclear Complex, 1945-1960
    Splitting Atoms, Fracturing Landscapes: Policymaking, Environmental Science, and the Nuclear Complex, 1945-1960 BY ©2013 Neil Shafer Oatsvall Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ Chairperson Sheyda Jahanbani _________________________ Gregory Cushman _________________________ Johannes Feddema _________________________ Sara Gregg _________________________ Theodore Wilson Date Defended: 7 December 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Neil Shafer Oatsvall certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Splitting Atoms, Fracturing Landscapes: Policymaking, Environmental Science, and the Nuclear Complex, 1945-1960 ________________________________ Chairperson Sheyda Jahanbani Date approved: 2 April 2013 ii ABSTRACT Neil S. Oatsvall, Ph.D. Department of History, May 2013 University of Kansas “Splitting Atoms, Fracturing Landscapes: Policymaking, Environmental Science, and the Nuclear Complex, 1945-1960” examines the implications of an expansive nuclear culture in the postwar United States. This dissertation probes the intersection of Cold War policymaking, environmental science, and the nuclear complex—a shorthand way of discussing the sum set of all nuclear technologies in conjunction with the societal structures and ideologies necessary to implement such technology. Studying a unified nuclear complex corrects for the limitations associated with studying all nuclear technologies as separate entities, something that has created fractured understandings of how splitting the atom affected both natural and human systems. This dissertation shows how U.S. policymakers in the early Cold War interacted with the environment and sought to fulfill their charge to protect the United States and its people while still attempting to ensure future national prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear-Conventional-Firebreaks
    NUCLEAR-CONVENTIONAL FIREBREAKS AND THE NUCLEAR TABOO BARRY D. WATTS NUCLEAR-COnVEnTIOnAL FIREBREAKS AnD THE NUCLEAR TABOO BY BARRy D. WATTS 2013 Acknowledgments The idea of exploring systematically why the leaders of various nations have chosen to maintain, or aspire to acquire, nuclear weapons was first suggested to me by Andrew W. Marshall. In several cases, the motivations attributed to national leaders in this report are undoubtedly speculative and open to debate. Nevertheless, it is a fact that the rulers of at least some nations entertain strong reasons for maintaining or acquiring nuclear weapons that have nothing to do with the nuclear competition between the United States and the former Soviet Union, either before or after 1991. Eric Edelman provided valuable suggestions on both substance and sources. At the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, Abby Stewart and Nick Setterberg did the majority of the editing. I am especially grateful to Nick for vetting the footnotes. Last but not least, Andrew Krepinevich’s suggestions on the narrative flow and the structure of the paper’s arguments greatly clarified the original draft. © 2013 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. COnTEnTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 5 THE AMERICAN SEARCH FOR ALTERNATIVES TO GENERAL NUCLEAR WAR 5 Context 7 Atomic Blackmail and Massive Nuclear Retaliation 11 Flexible Response and Assured Destruction 15 The Long Range Research and Development Planning Program 19 Selective Nuclear Options and Presidential Directive/NSC-59 23 The Strategic Defense Initiative 26 The Soviet General Staff, LNOs and Launch on Warning 29 POST-COLD WAR DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES AND RUSSIA 29 Evolving U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Children First, but Only If the Men Are Union Members: Hiring Halls and Delinquent Child-Supporters Lorraine A
    Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Volume 6 Article 8 Issue 2 Symposium on Women and the Law February 2014 Women and Children First, but Only If the Men are Union Members: Hiring Halls and Delinquent Child-Supporters Lorraine A. Schmall Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp Recommended Citation Lorraine A. Schmall, Women and Children First, but Only If the Men are Union Members: Hiring Halls and Delinquent Child-Supporters, 6 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 449 (1992). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjlepp/vol6/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST, BUT ONLY IF THE MEN ARE UNION MEMBERS: HIRING HALLS AND DELINQUENT CHILD- SUPPORTERS LORRAINE A. SCHMALL* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................... 450 II. DOES A GOVERNMENT ORDER TO A UNION TO IDENTIFY THE NAME OF AN EMPLOYER TO WHOM AN ADJUDGED DELINQUENT FATHER HAS BEEN REFERRED INTERFERE WITH ANY FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT A UNION OR ITS MEMBERS MAY HAVE? ....... 458 A. Historical Treatment of Labor Unions ............. 460 B. Unions and the First Amendment ................. 466 C. Unions' and Members' First Amendment Rights..... 468 III. DELINQUENT FATHERS ARE A SOCIETAL PROBLEM OF ENORMOUS PROPORTION .............................. 483 A. HistoricalHierarchies ........................... 483 B. Women's Economic Disadvantages ................ 487 C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discursive Emergence of Us Nuclear Weapons Policy
    BUILDING MORE BOMBS: THE DISCURSIVE EMERGENCE OF US NUCLEAR WEAPONS POLICY by JOHN M. VALDEZ A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of Political Science and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2018 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: John M. Valdez Title: Building More Bombs: The Discursive Emergence of US Nuclear Weapons Policy This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of Political Science by: Jane K. Cramer Chair Gerald Berk Core Member Lars Skalnes Core Member Greg McLauchlan Institutional Representative and Sara D. Hodges Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2018. ii © 2018 John M. Valdez iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT John M. Valdez Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science June 2018 Title: Building More Bombs: The Discursive Emergence of US Nuclear Weapons Policy This dissertation investigates the social construction and discursive emergence of US nuclear weapons policy against the backdrop of the nuclear taboo and its associated anti-nuclear discourse. The analysis is drawn from poststructuralism with a focus on the discourses that construct the social world and its attendant “common sense,” and makes possible certain policies and courses of action while foreclosing others. This methodology helps overcome the overdetermined nature of foreign policy, or its tendency to be driven simultaneously by the international strategic environment, the domestic political environment, and powerful domestic organizations, and while being shaped and delimited by the discourses associated with the nuclear taboo.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayne State University 1959 Commencement Programs
    WAYNE STATE ----­ UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT MASONIC TEMPLE JANUARY 29, 1959 BOARD OF GOVERNORS HON. REMUS G. ROBINSON, Chairman HON. LOUISE C. GRACE HON. BETTY S. BECKER HON. LEONARD KASLE HON. MELVIN E. BLEICH HON. CHRIS H. MAGNUSSON HON. ROSCOE O. BONISTEEL, SR. HON. WILLIAM D. MERRIFIELD HON. GLADYS CANTY HON. DON STEVENS HON. WARREN B. COOKSEY HON. LYNN M. BARTLETT, Ex Offlelo t COMMENCEMENT COMMITTEE I William M. Borgman Richard H. Schell Wesley H. Churchill Viola Sturges Schell Arthur J. Dolsen Harold E. Stewart Robert O. Eskola Homer D. Strong Robert W. Grant John C. Sullivan Evelyn E. Holtorf Harold E. Tallman Thelma G. James Thomas Tierney Gordon W. Kingsbury Elsie W. Townsend Alfred C. Lamb Elizabeth Platt Tschaeche J. Don Marsh Frank X. Tuohey Olive McLauchlan Howard M. Hess, Chairman Don H. Palmer Rupert L. Cortright, Marshal Valter Poole f I The Wayne State University Symphony Orchestra under the direction of Valter Poole Citations for Honorary Degree Candidates written by Thelma G. James The marshals and ushers serving during this commencement exercise are undergraduate students of the University O.RDER OF EXERCISES OVERTURE Prelude to the Meistersinger Wagner PROCESSIONAL The Emperor March Wagner (The audience is asked to rise as the academic procession enters and to remain standing until the Invocation has been pronounced.) HYMN TO WAYNE THE NATIONAL ANTHEM .. To thee, our Alma Mater, INVOCATION Homage we bring. The Reverend Walton E. Cole, D.D., First Congregational Church Brave hearts raise grateful voices Thy praise to sing. FOREWORD Young arf thou, young and strong; The Honorable Remus G. Robinson, Chairman, Wayne State University Board of Governors Renowned shalt thou live, and long; Honors to thee will throng- THE CONFERRING OF THE HONORARY DEGREES And Fame to thee cling.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCID: 4122497 TOP Secreth'comint
    DOCID: 4122497 TOP SECRETh'COMINT OHNR: OH-2012-81 DOI: Late 1960s TRSID: ragenti/jcrein2 DTR: 20 May 2013 QCSID: dpcoole Text Review: 21 June 2013 Text w/Tape: INAME: CANINE, Ralph J., LT GEN, USA (Retired) IPLACE: NSA, Ft. Meade, Maryland IVIEWER: --CARTER, Marshall S. (Pat), LT GEN, USA, DIRNSA; DAVID, Stephen L., Moderator, Deputy Commandant, National Cryptologic School (NCS) David: ((TR NOTE: Background static noise can be heard throughout the first 28.5 minutes of this interview.)) And we have with us this morning General Carter, who will be talking to General Ralph J. Canine, the first Director of the National Security Agency. Carter: First off, General, I'd like to present you a copy of our insignia or seal. It's rather lightweight because we make them downstairs out of plastic. But when they're on the wall, you can see obviously that it's (B% like solid) ... Canine: I have one, but it says "Defense Department" on it. ((Laughter heard.)) It's always kind of irritated me a little. Carter: Well, I might tell you that's why we have a new one. It irritated me, too. ((They laugh.)) Canine: We ... I'm somewhat to blame for that, though, General. I had a choice of how I was going to operate. And I hated to operate without somebody that I could call up and get some action some place. Somebody had to furnish the beans and the bacon-and the automobiles ... Carter: Right. Canine: Which was probably more important than the beans and the bacon, because we used a lot of them.
    [Show full text]