DOCSLIB.ORG

ETIMOLOGÍA De Los NOMBRES CIENTÍFICOS De Las AVES De ARGENTINA Su Significado Y Origen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ETIMOLOGÍA De Los NOMBRES CIENTÍFICOS De Las AVES De ARGENTINA Su Significado Y Origen Alejandro Mouchard ETIMOLOGÍA de los NOMBRES CIENTÍFICOS de las AVES de ARGENTINA Su significado y origen ETIMOLOGÍA de los NOMBRES CIENTÍFICOS de las AVES de ARGENTINA Alejandro Mouchard ETIMOLOGÍA de los NOMBRES CIENTÍFICOS de las AVES de ARGENTINA Su significado y origen Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara Departamento de Ciencias Naturales y Antropológicas CEBBAD - Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Universidad Maimónides Hidalgo 775 - 7° piso (1405BDB) Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires - República Argentina Teléfonos: 011-4905-1100 (int. 1228) E-mail: [email protected] Página web: www.fundacionazara.org.ar Ilustraciones de contratapa: Elisabeth Pepe Steger Diseño tapa: Fernando Vázquez Mazzini Diseño interior: Lorena Blanco Las opiniones vertidas en el presente libro son exclusiva responsabilidad de su autor y no reflejan opiniones institucionales de los editores o auspiciantes. Re ser va dos los de re chos pa ra to dos los paí ses. Nin gu na par te de es ta pu bli ca ción, in clui do el di se ño de la cu bier ta, pue de ser re pro du ci da, al ma ce na da o trans mi ti da de nin gu na for ma, ni por nin gún me dio, sea es te elec tró ni co, quí mi co, me cá ni co, elec tro-óp ti co, gra ba ción, fo to co pia, CD Rom, In ter net o cual quier otro, sin la pre via au to ri za ción es cri ta por par te de la edi to rial. Primera Edición: 2019 Impreso en la Argentina. Se terminó de imprimir en el mes de Mayo de 2019, en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. VAZQUEZ MAZZINI EDITORES Tel. (54-11) 4905-1232 [email protected] www.vmeditores.com.ar Mouchard, Alejandro Etimología de los nombres científicos de las aves de Argentina : su significado y origen / Alejandro Mouchard. - 1a ed. - Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, 2019. 392 p. ; 23 x 16 cm. ISBN 978-987-3781-42-1 1. Aves. I. Título. CDD 598 A mi esposa Sarita, y a mis hijas Julia, Clara y Carla. Índice Introducción .................................................................................... 15 CLASE AVES ...................................................................................... 19 NO PASSERIFORMES ......................................................................... 21 Orden Rheiformes ........................................................................... 21 Familia Rheidae .......................................................................... 21 Orden Tinamiformes ........................................................................ 23 Familia Tinamidae ....................................................................... 23 Orden Anseriformes ........................................................................ 29 Familia Anhimidae ...................................................................... 29 Familia Anatidae ......................................................................... 30 Orden Galliformes ........................................................................... 43 Familia Cracidae......................................................................... 43 Familia Odontophoridae ............................................................ 46 Familia Phasianidae ................................................................... 47 Orden Podicipediformes ................................................................. 47 Familia Podicipedidae ................................................................ 47 Orden Phoenicopteriformes ........................................................... 51 Familia Phoenicopteridae .......................................................... 51 Orden Sphenisciformes................................................................... 53 Familia Spheniscidae.................................................................. 53 Orden Procellariiformes ................................................................... 56 Familia Diomedeidae ................................................................. 56 Familia Procellariidae .................................................................. 62 Familia Hydrobatidae ................................................................. 75 Orden Ciconiiformes ....................................................................... 79 Familia Ciconiidae ...................................................................... 79 Orden Suliformes ............................................................................. 80 Orden Fregatidae............................................................................ 80 Familia Sulidae ............................................................................ 81 Familia Phalacrocoracidae ........................................................ 81 Familia Anhingidae ..................................................................... 85 Orden Pelecaniformes .................................................................... 86 Familia Pelecanidae ................................................................... 86 Familia Ardeidae ......................................................................... 86 Familia Threskiornithidae............................................................. 91 Orden Cathartiformes ..................................................................... 95 Familia Cathartidae .................................................................... 95 Orden Accipitriformes ..................................................................... 99 Familia Pandionidae ................................................................... 99 Familia Accipitridae .................................................................... 100 Orden Gruiformes ............................................................................ 118 Familia Aramidae ........................................................................ 118 Familia Rallidae ........................................................................... 118 Familia Heliornithidae ................................................................. 124 Orden Charadriiformes ................................................................... 125 Familia Charadriidae .................................................................. 125 Familia Haematopodidae .......................................................... 129 Familia Recurvirostridae.............................................................. 129 Familia Chionidae ....................................................................... 131 Familia Pluvianellidae ................................................................. 131 Familia Scolopacidae ................................................................. 131 Familia Thinocoridae ................................................................... 143 Familia Jacanidae ...................................................................... 148 Familia Rostratulidae................................................................... 149 Familia Stercorariidae ................................................................. 149 Familia Laridae ............................................................................ 152 Orden Columbiformes .................................................................... 161 Familia Columbidae ................................................................... 161 Orden Cuculiformes ........................................................................ 172 Familia Cuculidae ....................................................................... 172 Orden Strigiformes ........................................................................... 177 Familia Tytonidae ........................................................................ 177 Familia Strigidae .......................................................................... 177 Orden Caprimulgiformes ................................................................ 186 Familia Nyctibiidae ..................................................................... 186 Familia Caprimulgidae ............................................................... 187 Orden Apodiformes ......................................................................... 191 Familia Apodidae ........................................................................ 191 Familia Trochilidae ....................................................................... 196 Orden Trogoniformes ....................................................................... 211 Familia Trogonidae ...................................................................... 211 Orden Coraciiformes....................................................................... 212 Familia Alcedinidae .................................................................... 212 Familia Momotidae ..................................................................... 213 Orden Galbuliformes ...................................................................... 214 Familia Galbulidae ..................................................................... 214 Orden Piciformes ............................................................................. 215 Familia Ramphastidae................................................................ 215 Familia Picidae ............................................................................ 217 Orden Cariamiformes ..................................................................... 224 Familia Cariamidae .................................................................... 224 Orden Falconiformes .....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diversity and Structure of Bird and Mammal Communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: Response to Agricultural Practices and Landscape Alterations
    Diversity and structure of bird and mammal communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: response to agricultural practices and landscape alterations Julieta Decarre March 2015 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Division of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London 2 Imperial College London Department of Life Sciences Diversity and structure of bird and mammal communities in the Semiarid Chaco Region: response to agricultural practices and landscape alterations Supervised by Dr. Chris Carbone Dr. Cristina Banks-Leite Dr. Marcus Rowcliffe Imperial College London Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London 3 Declaration of Originality I herewith certify that the work presented in this thesis is my own and all else is referenced appropriately. I have used the first-person plural in recognition of my supervisors’ contribution. People who provided less formal advice are named in the acknowledgments. Julieta Decarre 4 Copyright Declaration The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives licence. Researchers are free to copy, distribute or transmit the thesis on the condition that they attribute it, that they do not use it for commercial purposes and that they do not alter, transform or build upon it. For any reuse or redistribution, researchers must make clear to others the licence terms of this work 5 “ …and we wandered for about four hours across the dense forest…Along the path I could see several footprints of wild animals, peccaries, giant anteaters, lions, and the footprint of a tiger, that is the first one I saw.” - Emilio Budin, 19061 I dedicate this thesis To my mother and my father to Virginia, Juan Martin and Alejandro, for being there through space and time 1 Book: “Viajes de Emilio Budin: La Expedición al Chaco, 1906-1907”.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Illinois
    Birds of Illinois A List of the Birds That Have Been Recorded in Illinois This list is based on the forthcoming revised checklist of Illinois birds. The checklist is based on the deliberations of the seven-member Illinois Ornithological Records Committee (IORC). IORC was organized in 1986 to review Illinois bird records using evidence submitted to the Committee. Such evidence may include an identifiable specimen, photograph, a digital or electronic image, video or audio tape recording, and/or written documentation. The taxonomy and nomenclature used here follow the seventh edition of the American Ornithologists' Union checklist (AOU 1998) and its supplements (through the 44th supplement, Banks et al 2003, issued July 2003). Key Evidence Type photo = photograph spec = specimen doc = written documentation Status Information Regular = Species for which there are records in at least eight of the past ten years. Casual = Species for which there are accepted records in three to seven of the past ten years. Accidental = Species for which there are accepted records in no more than two of the past ten years. Extirpated = Species which were formerly Casual or Regular in Illinois but which have not been recorded in the wild in the state for at least 50 years. Extinct = Species which have occurred in the state but no longer occur anywhere in the world. Breeding Information For species that have bred in Illinois, an additional notation appears in the entry, following a slash ("/"). B = Species which currently breed more or less regularly in the state. In general, this is defined by breeding in at least eight of the last ten years or 40 or more of the last 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • New Species Accepted –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Swinhoe’S Storm-Petrel (Oceanodroma Monorhis )
    his is the 20th published report of the ABA Checklist Committee (hereafter, TCLC), covering the period July 2008– July 2009. There were no changes to commit - tee membership since our previous report (Pranty et al. 2008). Kevin Zimmer has been elected to serve his second term (to expire at the end of 2012), and Bill Pranty has been reelected to serve as Chair for a fourth year. During the preceding 13 months, the CLC final - ized votes on five species. Four species were accepted and added to the ABA Checklist , while one species was removed. The number of accepted species on the ABA Checklist is increased to 960. In January 2009, the seventh edition of the ABA Checklist (Pranty et al. 2009) was published. Each species is numbered from 1 (Black-bellied Whistling-Duck) to 957 (Eurasian Tree Sparrow); ancillary numbers will be inserted for all new species, and these numbers will be included in our annual reports. Production of the seventh edi - tion of the ABA Checklist occupied much of Pranty’s and Dunn’s time during the period, and this com - mitment helps to explain the relative paucity of votes during 2008–2009 compared to our other recent an - nual reports. New Species Accepted –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Swinhoe’s Storm-Petrel (Oceanodroma monorhis ). ABA CLC Record #2009-02. One individual, thought to be a juvenile in slightly worn plumage, in the At - lantic Ocean at 3 4°5 7’ N, 7 5°0 5’ W, approximately 65 kilometers east-southeast of Hatteras Inlet, Cape Hat - teras, North Carolina on 2 June 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Fragmentation Compromises the Population Dynamic of the Globally Near-Threatened Straight-Billed Reedhaunter
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/468488; this version posted November 15, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Habitat fragmentation compromises the population dynamic of the globally near- 2 threatened Straight-billed Reedhaunter (Limnoctites rectirostris) 3 4 Maycon S. S. Gonçalves1,2, Priscila S. Pons1,2, Felipe C. Bonow2, Vinicius A. G. 5 Bastazini3, José A. Gil-Delgado1, Germán M. López-Iborra4 6 7 1Instituto Pró-Pampa (IPPampa), Laboratório de Ornitologia, Pelotas, Rio Grande do 8 Sul, Brazil 9 2Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Universidad de Valencia, 10 Paterna, Valencia, Spain 11 3Theoretical and Experimental Ecological Station, French National Center for Scientific 12 Research and Paul Sabatier University, Moulis, France 13 4Departamento de Ecología - IMEM Ramon Margalef, Universidad de Alicante, 14 Alicante, Spain 15 16 Corresponding author: [email protected] 17 18 Abstract 19 Understanding the consequences of habitat fragmentation to biological populations is 20 crucial to develop sound conservation polices. The Straight-billed Reedhaunter 21 (Limnoctites rectirostris) is a little known and threatened Passeriform that is highly 22 dependent Erygo wetlands patches. Here, we evaluated the effects of habitat bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/468488; this version posted November 15, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lista Roja De Las Aves Del Uruguay 1
    Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay 1 Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Adrián B. Azpiroz, Laboratorio de Genética de la Conservación, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Av. Italia 3318 (CP 11600), Montevideo ([email protected]). Matilde Alfaro, Asociación Averaves & Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá 4225 (CP 11400), Montevideo ([email protected]). Sebastián Jiménez, Proyecto Albatros y Petreles-Uruguay, Centro de Investigación y Conservación Marina (CICMAR), Avenida Giannattasio Km 30.5. (CP 15008) Canelones, Uruguay; Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Constituyente 1497 (CP 11200), Montevideo ([email protected]). Cita sugerida: Azpiroz, A.B., M. Alfaro y S. Jiménez. 2012. Lista Roja de las Aves del Uruguay. Una evaluación del estado de conservación de la avifauna nacional con base en los criterios de la Unión Internacional para la Conservación de la Naturaleza. Dirección Nacional de Medio Ambiente, Montevideo. Descargo de responsabilidad El contenido de esta publicación es responsabilidad de los autores y no refleja necesariamente las opiniones o políticas de la DINAMA ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes y no comprometen a estas instituciones. Las denominaciones empleadas y la forma en que aparecen los datos no implica de parte de DINAMA, ni de las organizaciones auspiciantes o de los autores, juicio alguno sobre la condición jurídica de países, territorios, ciudades, personas, organizaciones, zonas o de sus autoridades, ni sobre la delimitación de sus fronteras o límites.
    [Show full text]
  • References Please Help Making This Preliminary List As Complete As Possible!
    Cypraeidae - important references Please help making this preliminary list as complete as possible! ABBOTT, R.T. (1965) Cypraea arenosa Gray, 1825. Hawaiian Shell News 14(2):8 ABREA, N.S. (1980) Strange goings on among the Cypraea ziczac. Hawaiian Shell News 28 (5):4 ADEGOKE, O.S. (1973) Paleocene mollusks from Ewekoro, southern Nigeria. Malacologia 14:19-27, figs. 1-2, pls. 1-2. ADEGOKE, O.S. (1977) Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Ewekoro Formation (Paleocene) of southeastern Nigeria. Bulletins of American Paleontology 71(295):1-379, figs. 1-6, pls. 1-50. AIKEN, R. P. (2016) Description of two undescribed subspecies and one fossil species of the Genus Cypraeovula Gray, 1824 from South Africa. Beautifulcowries Magazine 8: 14-22 AIKEN, R., JOOSTE, P. & ELS, M. (2010) Cypraeovula capensis - A specie of Diversity and Beauty. Strandloper 287 p. 16 ff AIKEN, R., JOOSTE, P. & ELS, M. (2014) Cypraeovula capensis. A species of diversity and beauty. Beautifulcowries Magazine 5: 38–44 ALLAN, J. (1956) Cowry Shells of World Seas. Georgian House, Melbourne, Australia, 170 p., pls. 1-15. AMANO, K. (1992) Cypraea ohiroi and its associated molluscan species from the Miocene Kadonosawa Formation, northeast Japan. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum 19:405-411, figs. 1-2, pl. 57. ANCEY, C.F. (1901) Cypraea citrina Gray. The Nautilus 15(7):83. ANONOMOUS. (1971) Malacological news. La Conchiglia 13(146-147):19-20, 5 unnumbered figs. ANONYMOUS. (1925) Index and errata. The Zoological Journal. 1: [593]-[603] January. ANONYMOUS. (1889) Cypraea venusta Sowb. The Nautilus 3(5):60. ANONYMOUS. (1893) Remarks on a new species of Cypraea.
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Shell Club Auction Lot List - 22 October 2016 Albany Hall
    Auckland Shell Club Auction Lot List - 22 October 2016 Albany Hall. Setup from 9am. Viewing from 10am. Auction starts at 12am Lot Type Reserve 1 WW Helmet medium size ex Philippines (John Hood Alexander) 2 WW Helmet medium size ex Philippines (John Hood Alexander) 3 WW Helmet really large ex Philippines, JHA 4 WW Tridacna (small) embedded in coral ex Tonga 1963 5 WW Lambis truncata sebae ex Tonga 1979 6 WW Charonia tritonis - whopper 45cm. No operc. Tongatapu 1979 7 WW Cowries - tray of 70 lots 8 WW All sorts but lots of Solemyidae 9 WW Bivalves 25 priced lots 10 WW Mixed - 50 lots 11 WW Cowries tray of 119 lots - some duplication but includes some scarcer inc. draconis from the Galapagos, scurra from Somalia, chinensis from the Solomons 12 WW Univalves tray of 50 13 WW Univalves tray of 57 with nice Fasciolaridae 14 WW Murex - (8) Chicoreus palmarosae, Pternotus bednallii, P. Acanthopterus, Ceratostoma falliarum, Siratus superbus, Naquetia annandalei, Murex nutalli and Hamalocantha zamboi 15 WW Bivalves - tray of 50 16 WW Bivalves - tray of 50 17 Book The New Zealand Sea Shore by Morton and Miller - fair condition 18 Book Australian Shells by Wilson and Gillett excellent condition apart from some fading on slipcase 19 Book Shells of the Western Pacific in Colour by Kira (Vol.1) and Habe (Vol 2) - good condition 20 Book 3 on Pectens, Spondylus and Bivalves - 2 ex Conchology Section 21 WW Haliotis vafescous - California 22 WW Haliotis cracherodi & laevigata - California & Aus 23 WW Amustum bellotia & pleuronecles - Queensland 24 WW Haliotis
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property
    Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 185 Map 2: Andean-North Patagonian Biosphere Reserve: Context for the Nominated Proprty. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 186 Map 3: Vegetation of the Valdivian Ecoregion 187 Map 4: Vegetation Communities in Los Alerces National Park 188 Map 5: Strict Nature and Wildlife Reserve 189 Map 6: Usage Zoning, Los Alerces National Park 190 Map 7: Human Settlements and Infrastructure 191 Appendix 2: Species Lists Ap9n192 Appendix 2.1 List of Plant Species Recorded at PNLA 193 Appendix 2.2: List of Animal Species: Mammals 212 Appendix 2.3: List of Animal Species: Birds 214 Appendix 2.4: List of Animal Species: Reptiles 219 Appendix 2.5: List of Animal Species: Amphibians 220 Appendix 2.6: List of Animal Species: Fish 221 Appendix 2.7: List of Animal Species and Threat Status 222 Appendix 3: Law No. 19,292 Append228 Appendix 4: PNLA Management Plan Approval and Contents Appendi242 Appendix 5: Participative Process for Writing the Nomination Form Appendi252 Synthesis 252 Management Plan UpdateWorkshop 253 Annex A: Interview Guide 256 Annex B: Meetings and Interviews Held 257 Annex C: Self-Administered Survey 261 Annex D: ExternalWorkshop Participants 262 Annex E: Promotional Leaflet 264 Annex F: Interview Results Summary 267 Annex G: Survey Results Summary 272 Annex H: Esquel Declaration of Interest 274 Annex I: Trevelin Declaration of Interest 276 Annex J: Chubut Tourism Secretariat Declaration of Interest 278
    [Show full text]
  • Attagis Gayi Geoffroy Saint Hilaire Y Lesson, 1831
    FICHA DE ANTECEDENTES DE ESPECIE Id especie: NOMBRE CIENTÍFICO: Attagis gayi Geoffroy Saint Hilaire y Lesson, 1831 NOMBRE COMÚN: Perdicita cordillerana, tortolón, agachona grande, Rufous-bellied Seedsnipe Fotografía de Attagis gayi (AUTOR, Roberto Villablanca) Reino: Animalia Orden: Charadriiformes Phyllum/División: Chordata Familia: Thinocoridae Clase: Aves Género: Attagis Sinonimia: Nota Taxonómica: Se reconocen tres subespecies (Fjeldsa 1996): • Attagis gayi latreillii , Lesson 1831. Habita el norte de Ecuador • Attagis gayi simonsi , Chubb 1918, centro de Perú, hasta el norte de Chile, oeste de Bolivia y noroeste de Argentina. • Attagis gayi gayi , Geoffroy Saint Hilaire y Lesson 1831, Andes de Chile y Argentina, desde Antofagasta y Salta hasta Tierra del Fuego. ANTECEDENTES GENERALES Aspectos Morfológicos Longitud 27 a 31 cm, es la más grande de los representantes de la familia, no presenta dimorfismo sexual y tiene un cuerpo grande, con cabeza pequeña y piernas cortas, Su plumaje es muy críptico, con una coloración general parda, con ocre y rojizo en el abdomen (Martínez & González 2004). Color general por encima de un gris ceniza con rayitas o flechas concéntricas de un negro oscuro. Cubiertas alares más rufas y también moteadas de flechas negras. Primarias pardo oscuro, negruzcas en su barba externa. Supracaudales y rectrices rufo pálido con vermiculaciones negras. Garganta color isabelino, lados de ésta, cuello y parte superior del pecho de fondo rufo pálido con vermiculaciones negras concéntricas. Toda la parte inferior restante de un canela pálido u oscuro en algunos ejemplares. Subcaudales de igual coloración y en algunos ejemplares con verniculaciones transversales negras. Axilares y subalares canela pálido (Jaramillo 2005). Aspectos Reproductivos Nidifican en el suelo, los nidos son rudimentarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Nesting and Roosting on Glaciers at High Elevation, Cordillera Vilcanota, Peru
    The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 130(4):940–957, 2018 Avian nesting and roosting on glaciers at high elevation, Cordillera Vilcanota, Peru Spencer P. Hardy,1,4* Douglas R. Hardy,2 and Koky Castaneda˜ Gil3 ABSTRACT—Other than penguins, only one bird species—the White-winged Diuca Finch (Idiopsar speculifera)—is known to nest directly on ice. Here we provide new details on this unique behavior, as well as the first description of a White- fronted Ground-Tyrant (Muscisaxicola albifrons) nest, from the Quelccaya Ice Cap, in the Cordillera Vilcanota of Peru. Since 2005, .50 old White-winged Diuca Finch nests have been found. The first 2 active nests were found in April 2014; 9 were found in April 2016, 1 of which was filmed for 10 d during the 2016 nestling period. Video of the nest revealed infrequent feedings (.1 h between visits), slow nestling development (estimated 20–30 d), and feeding via regurgitation. The first and only active White-fronted Ground-Tyrant nest was found in October 2014, beneath the glacier in the same area. Three other unoccupied White-fronted Ground-Tyrant nests and an eggshell have been found since, all on glacier ice. At Quelccaya, we also observed multiple species roosting in crevasses or voids (caves) beneath the glacier, at elevations between 5,200 m and 5,500 m, including both White-winged Diuca Finch and White-fronted Ground-Tyrant, as well as Plumbeous Sierra Finch (Phrygilus unicolor), Rufous-bellied Seedsnipe (Attagis gayi), and Gray-breasted Seedsnipe (Thinocorus orbignyianus). These nesting and roosting behaviors are all likely adaptations to the harsh environment, as the glacier provides a microclimate protected from precipitation, wind, daily mean temperatures below freezing, and strong solar irradiance (including UV-B and UV-A).
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Sep 2018 Lists of Victims and Hosts of the Parasitic
    version: 21 Sep 2018 Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus). Peter E. Lowther, Field Museum Brood parasitism is an awkward term to describe an interaction between two species in which, as in predator-prey relationships, one species gains at the expense of the other. Brood parasites "prey" upon parental care. Victimized species usually have reduced breeding success, partly because of the additional cost of caring for alien eggs and young, and partly because of the behavior of brood parasites (both adults and young) which may directly and adversely affect the survival of the victim's own eggs or young. About 1% of all bird species, among 7 families, are brood parasites. The 5 species of brood parasitic “cowbirds” are currently all treated as members of the genus Molothrus. Host selection is an active process. Not all species co-occurring with brood parasites are equally likely to be selected nor are they of equal quality as hosts. Rather, to varying degrees, brood parasites are specialized for certain categories of hosts. Brood parasites may rely on a single host species to rear their young or may distribute their eggs among many species, seemingly without regard to any characteristics of potential hosts. Lists of species are not the best means to describe interactions between a brood parasitic species and its hosts. Such lists do not necessarily reflect the taxonomy used by the brood parasites themselves nor do they accurately reflect the complex interactions within bird communities (see Ortega 1998: 183-184). Host lists do, however, offer some insight into the process of host selection and do emphasize the wide variety of features than can impact on host selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the White-Winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus Candicans) in Eastern Paraguay
    Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 22(2), 219-233 ARTICLE June 2014 Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay Robert G. Pople Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK. Email: [email protected] Current address: BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA, UK. Received on 03 September 2013. Accepted on 02 October 2013. ABSTRACT: Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay. I present the first detailed description of the breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans), based on data collected over three breeding seasons during 1998-2001 at Aguará Ñu, Canindeyú, eastern Paraguay. Male nightjars defended small territories situated on the upper slopes of ridgelines. Each territory contained one or more “display arenas” at which the male performed nuptial display flights. Aggregation indices confirmed that the primary display arenas of males were significantly clustered within the survey area. Within their territories, males apparently selected display arenas on the basis of their structural characteristics: mounds used as arenas were significantly lower and broader than random mounds. Males engaged in display activity from late August to early January. On average, males performed 0.54 ± 0.04 display flights per minute during nocturnal focal watches, but there was considerable intra-male variation in display rate. Following a burst of activity immediately after their arrival at display arenas at dusk, male display rate was best explained by ambient levels of moonlight. Males produced a previously undescribed insect-like “tik tik” call when inactive on their territories.
    [Show full text]