DOCSLIB.ORG

• VLAN • High Speed Ethernet – Introduction – Fast Ethernet – Gigabit Ethernet – 10 Gigabit Ethernet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
• VLAN • High Speed Ethernet – Introduction – Fast Ethernet – Gigabit Ethernet – 10 Gigabit Ethernet Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 L07 - Ethernet Evolution L07 - Ethernet Evolution The Beginning • initial idea: shared media LAN – bus structure, CSMA/CD was access method – coax cable, transmission rate up to 10 Mbit/s – half-duplex transmission (two physical wires e.g. coax) The Ethernet Evolution collision domain From 10Mbit/s to 10Gigabit/s Ethernet Technology From Bridging to L2 Ethernet Switching and VLANs © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 3 Agenda Enlarging the Network • Ethernet Evolution • VLAN • High Speed Ethernet – Introduction – Fast Ethernet – Gigabit Ethernet – 10 Gigabit Ethernet repeater as signal amplifier used to enlarge the network diameter but no network segmentation !!! still one collision domain !!! © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 2 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 4 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Page 07 - 1 Page 07 - 2 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 L07 - Ethernet Evolution L07 - Ethernet Evolution Multiport Repeater Structured Cabling (2) • demand for telephony-like point-to-point cabling represents four CU wires 2 for Tmt, 2 for Rcv using Twisted Pair wires Server Farm (e.g. 10BaseT) – based on structured cabling standard represents two FO wires – 10BaseT as new Ethernet type to support this demand e.g. 10BaseF – four physical wires (2 for tmt, 2 for rcv) • network stations are connected star-like to a 10 Base F multiport repeater – multiport repeater is called “hub” • hub simulates the bus: "CSMA/CD in a box" • only half-duplex 10 Base T – only one network station can use the network at a given Client-PCs time, all others have to wait © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 5 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 7 Structured Cabling (1) Bridging • simple physical amplification with repeaters became insufficient Multiport Repeater, “Hub” “CSMA/CD in a box” – with repeaters all nodes share the given bandwidth – the whole network is still one collision domain – -> technology moved toward layer 2 • bridges segment a network into smaller collision domains – store and forward technology (packet switching) – the whole network is still a broadcast domain – Spanning Tree provides a unique path between each two 10 Base T devices and avoids broadcast storms © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 6 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 8 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Page 07 - 3 Page 07 - 4 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 L07 - Ethernet Evolution L07 - Ethernet Evolution Network Segmentation with Bridges Switching (2) collision domain on point-to-point link reduced to a single link collision domain on Bridge Broadcast Domain shared media (only half duplex possible) Switch Collision Domains © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 9 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 11 Switching (1) Switching (3) • "switching" means fast transparent bridging full duplex on point-to-point links collision domain on – implemented in hardware shared media (only half – also called Layer 2 (L2) switching or Ethernet switching duplex possible) • multiport switches allow full duplex operation on point-to-point links – no need for collision detection (media access control) on a link which is shared by two devices only • network station <-> switch port • switch <-> switch • multiport switches replaces multiport repeaters – a collision free Ethernet can be built, if network consists of point-to-point links only © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 10 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 12 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Page 07 - 5 Page 07 - 6 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 L07 - Ethernet Evolution L07 - Ethernet Evolution Switching (4) Switching (6) full duplex everywhere = collision free Ethernet LAN Server 100 Mbit/s 100 Mbit/s Server 1 Gbit/s 1 Gbit/s Flow Control possible Clients Broadcast Domain 10 Mbit/s © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 13 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 15 Switching (5) Redundant Topology L2 Switching PC3 PC6 • L2 switches can connect Ethernets with 10 represents four CU wires 2 for Tmt, 2 for Rcv Mbit/s, 100 Mbit/s or 1000 Mbit/s for example (e.g. 10BaseT) – clients using 10 Mbit/s either half duplex on shared media MAC D MAC F p1 p2 represents two FO wires or full duplex on point-to-point connection with switch e.g. 10BaseF – server uses 100 Mbit/s, full duplex, point-to-point S3 connection with switch t1 t2 – note: multiport repeater is not able to do this ! t1 Trunks t1 • L2 switch as packet switch operates with t2 t2 asynchronous TDM S1 S2 p1 p2 p1 p1 p2 – congestion can be avoided by using a new MAC based MAC A MAC B MAC E MAC C flow control (pause command) PC1 PC4 PC5 PC2 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 14 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 16 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Page 07 - 7 Page 07 - 8 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 L07 - Ethernet Evolution L07 - Ethernet Evolution Spanning Tree Applied Agenda PC3 PC6 • Ethernet Evolution • VLAN MAC D MAC F p1 p2 • High Speed Ethernet S3 – Introduction – Fast Ethernet t1 F t2 F (Forward) – Gigabit Ethernet t1 F Trunk t1 B (Blocked) – 10 Gigabit Ethernet t2 F t2 S1 S2 p1 p2 p1 p1 p2 MAC A MAC B MAC E MAC C PC1 PC4 PC5 PC2 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 17 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 19 Switching Table (L2) Virtual LANs (1) Switching Table S3 pro VLAN PC3 PC6 • today's work-groups are expanding over the MAC-Addr. Port/Trunk D p1 whole campus in case of local environment MAC D MAC F F p2 p1 p2 • users of one workgroup should be kept A,B,C,E t1 separated from other workgroups S3 Switching Table S1 pro VLAN – because of security reasons they should see there MAC-Addr. Port/Trunk t1 t2 Switching Table S2 pro VLAN necessary working environment only A p1 MAC-Addr. Port/Trunk B p2 t1 t1 E p1 • end-systems of one workgroup should see D,F t1 t2 t2 C p2 C,E t2 broadcasts only from stations of same A,B,D,F t2 S1 S2 p1 p2 p1 p1 p2 workgroup MAC A MAC B MAC E MAC C • the network must be flexible – to adapt continuous location changes of the end- PC1 PC4 PC5 PC2 systems/users © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 18 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 20 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Page 07 - 9 Page 07 - 10 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 L07 - Ethernet Evolution L07 - Ethernet Evolution Virtual LANs (2) VLAN Assignment • base idea of VLAN: • a station may be assigned to a VLAN – multiplexing of several LANs via same infrastructure – port-based (switches and connection between switches) • fixed assignment port 4 -> VLAN x • today's switches got the ability to combine • most common approach several network-stations to so-called "Virtual • a station is member of one specific VLAN only LANs“ – MAC-based • MAC A -> VLAN x – separate bridging/switching table maintained for every • allows integration of older shared-media components and single VLAN automatic location change support – separate broadcast handling for every single VLAN • a station is member of one specific VLAN only • each Virtual LAN is its own broadcast domain – protocol-based – separate Spanning Tree for every single VLAN • IP-traffic, port 1 -> VLAN x • note: IEEE 802.1w specifies a method to share one Rapid • NetBEUI-traffic, port 1 -> VLAN y Spanning Tree among all VLANs • a station could be member of different VLANs © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 21 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 23 VLAN Example Virtual Trunks - VLAN tagging VLAN A • switches must be connected via VLAN-trunks on A4 A5 A1A2 A3 which each particular VLAN-frame is "tagged" (marked) with an identifier – examples for tagging standards: • IEEE 802.10 (pre 802.1Q temporary solution) • ISL (Cisco) Table VLAN A Table VLAN A • IEEE 802.1Q Table VLAN B Table VLAN B • so switches can distinguish between several VLANs and manage their respective traffic B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 VLAN B © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 22 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 24 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Page 07 - 11 Page 07 - 12 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 Datenkommunikation 384.081 - SS 2007 L07 - Ethernet Evolution L07 - Ethernet Evolution 802.1Q VLAN Tagging 1 VLAN Operation (1) 802.3 802.2 LLC VLAN A A4 A5 802.1Q A1A2 A3 preamble DA SA length DSAP SSAP Ctrl data FCS Fields A1 -> A3 A5 -> broadcast 2 Byte 2 Byte TPID … Tag Protocol Identifier TPID TIC TCI … Tag Control Information 0x8100 trunk untagged frames 3 Bit 1 Bit 12 Bit UP CFI VID B1 -> B5 UP … User Priority note: With tagging Ethernets maximal CFI … Canonical Format Identifier frame length = 1522, minimal frame VID … VLAN Identifier B1 B2VLAN B B3 B4 B5 length = 68 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 25 © 2007, D.I. Manfred Lindner Ethernet Evolution, v4.6 27 802.1Q VLAN Tagging 2 VLAN Operation (2) Ethernet V2 VLAN A A4 A5 802.1Q A1A2 A3 preamble DA SA type data FCS Fields 2 Byte 2 Byte A1 -> A3 tag VLAN A TPID … Tag Protocol Identifier A5 -> broadcast TPID TIC TCI … Tag Control Information A5 -> broadcast 0x8100 B1 -> B5 3 Bit 1 Bit 12 Bit UP CFI VID tag VLAN B UP … User Priority note: With tagging Ethernets maximal CFI … Canonical Format Identifier frame length = 1522, minimal frame VID … VLAN Identifier B1 B2VLAN B B3 B4 B5 length = 68 © 2007, D.I.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table 48–4 Lists the Defined Ordered Sets and Special Code-Groups
    Proposal for an Initial draft of 10GBaseCX4 48. Physical Coding Sublayer (PCS) and Physical Medium Attachment (PMA) sublayer, type 10GBASE-X 48.1 Overview This clause specifies the Physical Coding Sublayer (PCS) and the Physical Medium Attachment (PMA) sub- layer that are common to a family of 10 Gb/s Physical Layer implementations, collectively known as 10GBASE-X. The 10GBASE-LX4 PMD described in Clause 53 and 10GBASE-CX4 described in Clause 54 are members of the 10GBASE-X PHY family. The term 10GBASE-X is used when referring to issues common to any of the variants within this family. The 10GBASE-X PCS and PMA sublayers are also utilized by the XGXS specified in Clause 47. 10GBASE-X PCS and PMA sublayers map the interface characteristics of the PMD sublayer (including MDI) to the services expected by the Reconciliation Sublayer (RS) and the logical and electrical characteris- tics of the 10 Gigabit Media Independent Interface (XGMII). Although the XGMII is optional, it is used as the basis for the definition of the 10GBASE-X PCS and PMA sublayers. 10GBASE-X assumes the use of the MDIO interface and register set for communication between PHY and Station Management (STA) entities, see Clause 45. 10GBASE-X has the following characteristics: a) The capability of supporting 10 Gb/s operation at the XGMII and RS b) Clock references embedded in all data and control code-groups c) Data paths consisting of independent serial links called lanes d) Independent four-lane-wide transmit and receive data paths e) Simple signal mapping to the XGMII
    [Show full text]
  • VSC8489-10 and VSC8489-13
    VSC8489-10 and VSC8489-13 Dual Channel WAN/LAN/Backplane Highlights RXAUI/XAUI to SFP+/KR 10 GbE SerDes PHY • IEEE 1588v2 compliant with VeriTime™ • Failover switching and lane ordering Vitesse’s dual channel SerDes PHY provides fully • Simultaneous LAN and WAN support IEEE 1588v2-compliant devices and hardware-based KR • RXAUI/XAUI support support for timing-critical applications, including all • SFP+ I/O with KR support industry-standard protocol encapsulations. • 1 GbE support VeriTime™ is Vitesse’s patent-pending distributed timing technology Applications that delivers the industry’s most accurate IEEE 1588v2 timing implementation. IEEE 1588v2 timing integrated in the PHY is the • Multiple-port RXAUI/XAUI to quickest, lowest cost method of implementing the timing accuracy that SFI/ SFP+ line cards or NICs is critical to maintaining existing timing-critical capabilities during the • 10GBASE-KR compliant backplane migration from TDM to packet-based architectures. transceivers The VSC8489-10 and VSC8489-13 devices support 1-step and 2-step • Carrier Ethernet networks requiring PTP frames for ordinary clock, boundary clock, and transparent clock IEEE 1588v2 timing applications, along with complete Y.1731 OAM performance monitoring capabilities. • Secure data center to data center interconnects The devices meet the SFP+ SR/LR/ER/220MMF host requirements in accordance with the SFF-8431 specifications. They also compensate • 10 GbE switch cards and router cards for optical impairments in SFP+ applications, along with degradations of the PCB. The devices provide full KR support, including KR state machine, for autonegotiation and link optimization. The transmit path incorporates a multitap output driver to provide flexibility to meet the demanding 10GBASE-KR (IEEE 802.3ap) Tx output launch requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for a 10 Gigabit Ethernet WAN PHY
    Contribution to IEEE 802.3 HSSG Proposal for a 10 Gigabit Ethernet WAN PHY November 10, 1999 Norival Figueira, Nortel Networks Paul Bottorff, Nortel Networks Tom Palkert, AMCC Notice This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE 802.3 HSSG. This document is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contrib- utor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend, or withdraw material contained herein. This document does not constitute commitment from the contributing organization(s) to implement the technolo- gy disclosed herein in any current or future product. Release The contributor(s) acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made publicly avail- able by IEEE 802.3 HSSG. CONTRIBUTION TO IEEE 802.3 HSSG Contents 1. Summary................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. 10GMII data stream.................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1 Inter-frame <inter-frame>.............................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Preamble <preamble> and start of frame delimiter <sfd>............................................................. 2 2.2.1 Transmit case ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE Std 802.3™-2012 New York, NY 10016-5997 (Revision of USA IEEE Std 802.3-2008)
    IEEE Standard for Ethernet IEEE Computer Society Sponsored by the LAN/MAN Standards Committee IEEE 3 Park Avenue IEEE Std 802.3™-2012 New York, NY 10016-5997 (Revision of USA IEEE Std 802.3-2008) 28 December 2012 IEEE Std 802.3™-2012 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.3-2008) IEEE Standard for Ethernet Sponsor LAN/MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society Approved 30 August 2012 IEEE-SA Standard Board Abstract: Ethernet local area network operation is specified for selected speeds of operation from 1 Mb/s to 100 Gb/s using a common media access control (MAC) specification and management information base (MIB). The Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) MAC protocol specifies shared medium (half duplex) operation, as well as full duplex operation. Speed specific Media Independent Interfaces (MIIs) allow use of selected Physical Layer devices (PHY) for operation over coaxial, twisted-pair or fiber optic cables. System considerations for multisegment shared access networks describe the use of Repeaters that are defined for operational speeds up to 1000 Mb/s. Local Area Network (LAN) operation is supported at all speeds. Other specified capabilities include various PHY types for access networks, PHYs suitable for metropolitan area network applications, and the provision of power over selected twisted-pair PHY types. Keywords: 10BASE; 100BASE; 1000BASE; 10GBASE; 40GBASE; 100GBASE; 10 Gigabit Ethernet; 40 Gigabit Ethernet; 100 Gigabit Ethernet; attachment unit interface; AUI; Auto Negotiation; Backplane Ethernet; data processing; DTE Power via the MDI; EPON; Ethernet; Ethernet in the First Mile; Ethernet passive optical network; Fast Ethernet; Gigabit Ethernet; GMII; information exchange; IEEE 802.3; local area network; management; medium dependent interface; media independent interface; MDI; MIB; MII; PHY; physical coding sublayer; Physical Layer; physical medium attachment; PMA; Power over Ethernet; repeater; type field; VLAN TAG; XGMII The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE 802.3 Working Group November 2006 Plenary Week
    IEEE 802.3 Working Group November 2006 Plenary Week Robert M. Grow Chair, IEEE 802.3 Working Group [email protected] Web site: www.ieee802.org/3 13 November 2006 IEEE 802 November Plenary 1 Current IEEE 802.3 activities • P802.3ap, Backplane Ethernet Published• P802.3aq, 10GBASE-LRM • P802.3ar, Congestion Management Approved• P802.3as, Frame Format Extensions • P802.3at, DTE Power Enhancements • P802.3av, 10 Gb/s EPON New • Higher Speed Study Group 13 November 2006 IEEE 802 November Plenary 2 P802.3ap Backplane Ethernet • Define Ethernet operation over electrical backplanes – 1Gb/s serial – 10Gb/s serial – 10Gb/s XAUI-based 4-lane – Autonegotiation • In Sponsor ballot • Meeting plan – Complete resolution of comments on P802.3ap/D3.1, 1st recirculation Sponsor ballot – Possibly request conditional approval for submittal to RevCom 13 November 2006 IEEE 802 November Plenary 3 P802.3aq 10GBASE-LRM • Extends Ethernet capabilities at 10 Gb/s – New physical layer to run under 802.3ae specified XGMII – Extends Ethernet capabilities at 10 Gb/s – Operation over FDDI-grade multi-mode fiber • Approved by Standards Board at September meeting • Published 16 October 2006 • No meeting – Final report to 802.3 13 November 2006 IEEE 802 November Plenary 4 P802.3ar Congestion Management • Proposed modified project documents failed to gain consensus support in July • Motion to withdraw the project was postponed to this meeting • Current draft advancement to WG ballot was not considered in July • Meeting plan – Determine future of the project – Reevaluate
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Issues and the Installed Base of Cabling
    CustomerCustomer andand MarketMarket Issues:Issues: 1010 GbpsGbps EthernetEthernet onon CategoryCategory 55 oror BetterBetter CablingCabling Bruce Tolley Cisco Systems, Inc [email protected] 1 IEEE 802.3 Interim January 2003 GbEGbE SwitchSwitch Ports:Ports: FiberFiber vsvs CopperCopper Ports (000s) 802.3ab 8,000 STD 7,000 6/99 6,000 802.3z 5,000 STD Total 4,000 6/98 Fiber 3,000 Copper 2,000 1,000 0 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2 Source: Dell’Oro 2002 IEEE 802.3 Interim January 2003 SuccessSuccess ofof GbEGbE onon CopperCopper • It is 10/100/1000 Mbps • It runs Cat5, 5e and 6 • It does not obsolete the installed base • It does not require both ends of the link to be upgraded at the same time 3 IEEE 802.3 Interim January 2003 1010 GbEGbE LayerLayer DiagramDiagram Media Access Control (MAC) Full Duplex 10 Gigabit Media Independent Interface (XGMII) or 10 Gigabit Attachment Unit Interface (XAUI) CWDM Serial Serial LAN PHY LAN PHY WAN PHY (8B/10B) (64B/66B) (64B/66B + WIS) CWDM Serial Serial Serial Serial Serial Serial PMD PMD PMD PMD PMD PMD PMD 1310 nm 850 nm 1310 nm 1550 nm 850 nm 1310 nm 1550 nm -LX4 -SR -LR -ER -SW -LW -EW Source: Cisco Systems 4 IEEE 802.3 Interim January 2003 Pluggable 10 GbE Modules: The Surfeit of SKUs 10GBASE XENPAK X2/XPAK XFP PMDs XAUI XAUI -SR X X -LR X X X -ER X X -LX4 X X -CX4 X X -T X X X CWDM, X X X DWDM Please: No new pluggable for 10GBASE-T! 5 IEEE 802.3 Interim January 2003 CumulativeCumulative WorldWorld--widewide ShipmentsShipments 1300 1200 Cat 7 Cat5 Cat5 1100 Cat 6 59% 51% 1000 Cat 5e 900 Cat 5 800
    [Show full text]
  • SGI® IRIS® Release 2 Dual-Port Gigabit Ethernet Board User's Guide
    SGI® IRIS® Release 2 Dual-Port Gigabit Ethernet Board User’s Guide 007-4324-001 CONTRIBUTORS Written by Matt Hoy and updated by Terry Schultz Illustrated by Dan Young and Chrystie Danzer Production by Karen Jacobson Engineering contributions by Jim Hunter and Steve Modica COPYRIGHT © 2002, 2003, Silicon Graphics, Inc. All rights reserved; provided portions may be copyright in third parties, as indicated elsewhere herein. No permission is granted to copy, distribute, or create derivative works from the contents of this electronic documentation in any manner, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Silicon Graphics, Inc. LIMITED RIGHTS LEGEND The electronic (software) version of this document was developed at private expense; if acquired under an agreement with the US government or any contractor thereto, it is acquired as “commercial computer software” subject to the provisions of its applicable license agreement, as specified in (a) 48 CFR 12.212 of the FAR; or, if acquired for Department of Defense units, (b) 48 CFR 227-7202 of the DoD FAR Supplement; or sections succeeding thereto. Contractor/manufacturer is Silicon Graphics, Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy 2E, Mountain View, CA 94043-1351. TRADEMARKS AND ATTRIBUTIONS Silicon Graphics, SGI, the SGI logo, IRIS, IRIX, Octane, Onyx, Onyx2, and Origin are registered trademarks, and Octane2, Silicon Graphics Fuel, and Silicon Graphics Tezro are trademarks of Silicon Graphics, Inc., in the United States and/or other countries worldwide. FCC WARNING This equipment has been tested and found compliant with the limits for a Class A digital device, pursuant to Part 15 of the FCC rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Gigabit Ethernet Pocket Guide
    GbE.PocketG.fm Page 1 Friday, March 3, 2006 9:43 AM Carrier Class Ethernet, Metro Ethernet tester, Metro Ethernet testing, Metro Ethernet installation, Metro Ethernet maintenance, Metro Ethernet commissioning, Carrier Class Ethernet tester, Carrier Class Ethernet testing, Carrier Class Ethernet installation, Carrier Class Ethernet maintenance, Gigabit Ethernet tester, Gigabit Ethernet testing, Gigabit Ethernet installation, Gigabit Ethernet maintenance, Gigabit Ethernet commissioning, Gigabit Ethernet protocols, 1000BASE-T tester, 1000BASE-LX test, 1000BASE-SX test, 1000BASE-T testing, 1000BASE-LX testing Trend’s Gigabit EthernetPocket Guide AuroraTango Gigabit Ethernet Multi-technology Personal Test Assistant Platform for simple, fast and effective testing of Gigabit Ethernet, ADSL, OSI model 802.3 model SHDSL, and ISDN. Aurora Tango 7 Application Upper layers Gigabit Ethernet has an exceptional 6 Presentation Reconciliation range of features Upper ensuring reliable delivery of end-to-end 5 Session layers services over Metropolitan networks MII Media independent based on Gigabit Ethernet. 4 It includes a full range of tests and Transport measurements, such as RFC-2544, PCS top ten addresses, real-time Ethernet 3 Network LLC (802.2) statistics, multilayer BERT, etc. Two PMA Gigaport transceivers allow terminate, 2 Data Link MAC (803.3) loopback and monitor connections to Autonegotiation networks, plus a 10/100/1000BASE-T Physical cable port for legacy testing. 1 PHY (802.3) dependent Media MDI A PDA provides an intuitive graphical menu
    [Show full text]
  • Latticesc/M Broadcom XAUI/Higig 10 Gbps Lattice Semiconductor Physical Layer Interoperability Over CX-4
    LatticeSC/M Broadcom® XAUI/HiGig™ 10 Gbps Physical Layer Interoperability Over CX-4 August 2007 Technical Note TN1155 Introduction This technical note describes a physical layer 10-Gigabit Ethernet and HiGig (10 Gbps) interoperability test between a LatticeSC/M device and the Broadcom BCM56800 network switch. The test was limited to the physical layer (up to XGMII) of the 10-Gigabit Ethernet protocol stack. Specifically, the document discusses the following topics: • Overview of LatticeSC™ and LatticeSCM™ devices and Broadcom BCM56800 network switch • Physical layer interoperability setup and results Two significant aspects of the interoperability test need to be highlighted: • The BCM56800 uses a CX-4 HiGig port, whereas the LatticeSC Communications Platform Evaluation Board provides an SMA connector. A CX-4 to SMA conversion board was used as a physical medium interface to cre- ate a physical link between both boards. The SMA side of the CX-4 to SMA conversion board has four differential TX/RX channels (10 Gbps bandwidth total). All four SMA channels (Quad 360) were connected to the LatticeSC side. • The physical layer interoperability ran at a 10-Gbps data rate (12.5-Gbps aggregated rate). XAUI Interoperability XAUI is a high-speed interconnect that offers reduced pin count and the ability to drive up to 20” of PCB trace on standard FR-4 material. In order to connect a 10-Gigabit Ethernet MAC to an off-chip PHY device, an XGMII inter- face is used. The XGMII is a low-speed parallel interface for short range (approximately 2”) interconnects. XAUI interoperability is based on the 10-Gigabit Ethernet standard (IEEE Standard 802.3ae-2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Link Signaling Sublayer Proposal
    Link Signaling Sublayer (LSS) Proposal By: Osamu Ishida, Kenji Kawai, Kazuhiko Terada, Haruhiko Ichino (NTT) Don Alderrou, Steve Dreyer, Rich Taborek (nSerial) Brad Booth, Henning Lysdal, Atikem Haile-Mariam, Mark T. Feuerstraeter (Intel) Paul Bottorff, Nan Chen, Norival Figueira, David Martin (Nortel) Kevin Daines (World Wide Packets) Praveen Kumar, Devendra Tripathi (VITESSE) Mike Lerer, Hank Zannini (AVICI) Bhanu Nanduri (Lara Networks) Stuart Robinson, Tom Alexander, Gary Bourque (PCM-Sierra) Koichiro Seto (Hitachi Cable) Rick Walker (Agilent) Takashi Yoshikawa (NEC) IEEE P802.3ae Plenary week meeting, La Jolla, CA, July 10-13, 2000 IEEE 802.3ae La Jolla, CA July 10-13, 2000 Task Force LSS Proposal (R1) Slide 1 Presentation Purpose ! Update of May ’00 proposal ! http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/ae/public/may00/ishida_1_0500.pdf ! Clarification of Link Signaling Sublayer (LSS) function ! Advertising Management Register Status to Link Partner ! Break Link, Remote Fault, and OAM&P (optional) ! Link Signaling (LS) code mapping ! Code set with 4-bit minimum Hamming distance ! Link Status Code defined for Break Link and Remote Fault IEEE 802.3ae La Jolla, CA July 10-13, 2000 Task Force LSS Proposal (R1) Slide 2 Why do Link Signaling? ! IEEE P802.3ae includes new Ethernet objectives ! Support at least 40 km fiber links ! Provide LAN compatible SONET OAM&P signaling ! Assess OK/NotOK link status (mandatory) ! without using Auto-Negotiation function ! Manage the LAN cable plant (optional) ! Exchange trace identifiers to ascertain link connections ! Reporting link performance (BER etc.) for maintenance IEEE 802.3ae La Jolla, CA July 10-13, 2000 Task Force LSS Proposal (R1) Slide 3 What is Link Signaling? Data LLC LLC MAC Cont.
    [Show full text]
  • 10G-EPON Standardization and Its Development Status
    © 2009 OSA/OFC/NFOEC 2009 NThC4.pdf 10G-EPON Standardization and Its Development Status Keiji Tanaka KDDI R&D Laboratories Inc. [email protected] Outline 1. Background and motivation 2. IEEE 802.3av standardization 3. Research activities 4. Development status 5. Summary ᵐ K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo 978-1-55752-865-0/09/$25.00 ©2009 IEEE 1 Outline 1. Background and motivation (a) FTTH growth in Japan (b) FTTH systems (c) Why 10G-EPON necessary? (d) When 10G-EPON feasible? 2. IEEE 802.3av standardization 3. Research activities 4. Development status 5. Summary ᵑ K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo FTTH growth in Japan The number of FTTH lines, more than 13 million at the end of Sep. 2008, exceeded the number of DSL lines in 2Q/2008. 20 Shifted to decrease StatisticsStatistics asas ofof Sep.Sep. 20082008 DSL 15 $ Number of lines: FTTH: 13.8 M DSL: 12.0 M FTTH CATV: 4.0 M 10 (Mobile: 92.0 M) $ Number of operators: FTTH: 171 5 CATV DSL: 47 CATV: 381 Number of broadband users [Million] 0 ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06 ‘07 ‘08 ‘09 ‘10 Year Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications statistics database ᵒ K.Tanaka, OFC/NFOEC 2009, Mar. 23-26, 2009 All Rights Reserved © 2009 KDDI, Tokyo 2 Flavors of FTTH systems High WDM-PON Apartment Data rate SS (Bandwidth) TDM-PON VDSL Efficiency High DSLAM Optical access system VDSL CPE 100Mbit/s CO or Residential house SS 1Gbit/s Media converter Single star Media converter Media converter Power Power splitter splitter Optical fiber PON Passive double star PON-OLT Power splitter PON topology is suitable for accommodating a lot of users and distributing broadcasting video services.
    [Show full text]
  • Cisco Presentation Guide
    EthernetEthernet PetrPetr GrygGrygáárekrek © 2005 Petr Grygarek, Advanced Computer Networks Technologies 1 EthernetEthernet HistorHistoryy •ResearchResearch background:background: AlohaNetAlohaNet •UniversityUniversity ofof Hawai,Hawai, 19701970:: commoncommon (radio)(radio) channelchannel sharingsharing methodsmethods –– basisbasis forfor CSMA/CDCSMA/CD •1980:1980: DIXDIX publishedpublished EthernetEthernet standardstandard (Metcalfe)(Metcalfe) •1985:1985: IEEEIEEE 802802.3.3 (MAC(MAC andand LLCLLC layers)layers) •10Base5,10Base5, 10Base2,10Base2, 10BaseT10BaseT •19951995 IEEEIEEE 802.3u802.3u (Fast(Fast Ethernet)Ethernet) •19981998 IEEEIEEE 802.3z802.3z (Gigabit(Gigabit Ethernet)Ethernet) •20022002 IEEEIEEE 802.3ae802.3ae (10Gb(10Gb Ethernet)Ethernet) •...... © 2005 Petr Grygarek, Advanced Computer Networks Technologies 2 EthernetEthernet NamingNaming RulesRules (IEEE(IEEE Standard)Standard) MbpsMbps [Base|Broad][Base|Broad] [segment[segment_length_length_m_m || -medium-medium]] --TT -- TwistedTwisted Pair,Pair, --FF -- FiberFiber optic,optic, ...... e.g.e.g. 10Base5,10Base5, 10BaseT,10BaseT, 100BaseF100BaseF NameName ofof eacheach particularparticular EthernetEthernet technologytechnology defineddefined inin individualindividual supplementsupplementss ofof 802.3802.3 standardstandard •e.ge.g 802.3u,802.3u, 802.3ab,802.3ab, 802.3z802.3z © 2005 Petr Grygarek, Advanced Computer Networks Technologies 3 Half-duplexHalf-duplex andand Full-duplexFull-duplex EthernetEthernet •HalfHalf duplexduplex –– colissioncolission envirnmentenvirnment
    [Show full text]