DOCSLIB.ORG

Berthrongdonald.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Berthrongdonald.Pdf University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Donald J. Berthrong Collection Berthrong, Donald J. Papers, 1750–1879. 13 feet. Professor. Photocopies of correspondence (1786–1918) of government officials regarding Great Plains Indian tribes and their relations and treaties with the United States; treaties (1803–1875) between these tribes and the United States; maps (1750–1876) of treaty areas; and manuscripts (1965) regarding the Indians of the Great Plains. Box 1 Folder: 1. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, September 19, 1827. 2. A treaty between the United States and the Thornton Party of Miami Indians, February 11, 1828. 3. A treaty of between Untied States and the Wea Tribe of Indians, August 11, 1820. 4. A treaty between the United States and the Kickapoos of the Vermilion, September 5, 1820. 5. A treaty between the United States and the Wyandotte tribe of Indians, September 20, 1818. 6. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, October 26, 1832. 7. A treaty between the Untied States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, October 27, 1832. 8. A letter from J.W. Johnson, Indian Agent, Fort Wayne to the Honorable William Eustis, Secretary of War for the United States, November 28, 1811. 9. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, October 20, 1832. 10. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, October 27, 1832. 11. A treaty between the United States and the Miami Tribe of Indians, November 6, 1838. 12. A treaty between the United States and the Miami Tribe of Indians, November 28, 1840. 13. A Treaty of Unification between the Pottawatomie Nation and the United States and the various tribes and bands which formed the Pottawatomie Nation, September 17, 1846. 14. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, April 22, 1836. 15. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, September 23, 1836. 16. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, August 5, 1836. 17. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, April 27, 1832. 18. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, September 20, 1836. 19. A treaty between the United States and the United Nation of the Chippewa, Ohowa and Pottawatomie, September 26, 1833. 20. A treaty between the United States and the Miami Tribe of Indians, October 23, 1834. 21. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, December 4, 1834. 22. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, December 10, 1834. 23. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, December 17, 1834. 24. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, March 29, 1836. 25. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, April 11, 1936. 26. A treaty between the United States and the Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians, February 11, 1837. 27. A map of the state of Indiana; Pottawatomie Indians, Wabash Band Treaties, 1932; Pottawatomie Indians, Prairie Band Treaties, 1833; Chippewa Indians, Mississippi River and Lake Superior Band Treaties, 1848; Chippewa Indians, Mississippi Band Treaties, 1855; Chippewa Indians, Red Lake and Pemina Band Treaties, 1864; Chippewa Indian Treaties, 1865 Box 2 Folder: 1. Records of the War Department, United States Army commands, Fort Wallace, Kansas, selected letters received concerning Indian depredations, Forsyth Patrol, Preparation Campaign of 1868, especially cooperation with General Carr and his forces. a. June 6, 1866-July 2, 1867 b. April 10, 1868-June 9, 1868 c. August 19, 1868-February 28, 1869 2. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Dodge, Kansas, selected letters received concerning Indian depredations. a. February 16, 1866-March 8, 1866 b. January 15, 1867-January 25, 1868 c. March 1, 1868-August 24, 1868 3. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Laramie, Wyoming, selected letters received concerning attempt to purchase fort by Cheyenne and Indian movement and actions. a. December 1, 1849 b. October 11, 1855-October 25, 1855 c. March 19, 1856-October 28, 1856 d. April 20, 1857 e. July 8, 1857-September 3, 1857 f. December 22, 1857-December 24, 1857 4. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Lyon, Colorado, selected letters received concerning Indian depredations and movements. a. July 15, 1868-October 22, 1868 b. February 10, 1869-February 16, 1869 c. January 15, 1879 d. June 29, 1870 5. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Harker, Kansas, selected letters received.. a. August 15, 1866 b. November 19, 1866 c. January 25, 1867 d. June 12, 1867 e. August 14, 1867 f. November 24, 1868 g. December 17, 1869-December 24, 1869 6. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Supply, Indian Territory, selected letters received.. a. February 1, 1869 b. May 3, 1869-June 28, 1869 c. August 14, 1869 d. September 17, 1869-September 18, 1869 e. January 9, 1870-January 28, 1870 f. April 23, 1870-June 21, 1870 g. September 2, 1870-September 23, 1870 h. November 2, 1870-November 4, 1870 7. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Supply, Indian Territory, selected letters received. a. March 24, 1871 b. May 13, 1871-May 15, 1871 c. July 21, 1871 d. September 20, 1871 e. January 22, 1872-February 23, 1872 f. April 26, 1872-June 24, 1872 g. October 20, 1872-November 2, 1872 h. March 15, 1873-May 23, 1873 i. July 15, 1873-July 17, 1873 j. September 5, 1873-November 9, 1873 k. March 26, 1874-July 11, 1874 l. November 15, 1874-november 19, 1874 8. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Hays, Kansas, selected letters received. a. August 25, 1867 b. May 28, 1868-May 31, 1868 c. July 19, 1868-July 20, 1868 d. April 30, 1869-May 10, 1869 e. October 10, 1869-October 19, 1869 f. December 20, 1869 g. February 12, 1870-February 19, 1870 9. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Larned, Kansas, selected letters received. a. September 2, 1861 b. March 21, 1868-July 9, 1868 c. September 8, 1868-September 20, 1868 10. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, selected letters received . a. September 20, 1844-September 30, 1844 b. August 14, 1847 c. February 12, 1850-February 23, 1850 d. October 12, 1850 e. November 1, 1866 f. May 16, 1867 11. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, District of Colorado, selected letters received. a. April 9, 1864-May 22, 1865 12. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Districts of Colorado and Missouri, selected letters received. a. June 1, 1863-September 14, 1863 b. November 8, 1863-November 21, 1863 Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Department of the Missouri District if the Plains, selected letters received a. June 20, 1865 b. August 18, 1865 13. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Department of the Missouri, selected letters received. a. October 23, 1865-October 30, 1865 b. December 27, 1865-January 21, 1866 c. March 3, 1866-March 8, 1866 d. September 28, 1866-October 30, 1866 e. December 5, 1866-January 30, 1867 14. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Department of the Missouri, selected letters received. a. February 1, 1867-August 15, 1867 b. October 30, 1867 c. March 19, 1868-July 8, 1868 d. January 14, 1869 15. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands and letters sent to Military Division of the Missouri. a. December 2, 1868-January 28, 1869 b. May 11, 1869-May 19, 1869 Box 3 Folder: 16. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands and letters sent to Department of the Missouri. a. Volume 84: April 8, 1873 b. Volume 84: November 3, 1873 17. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Military Division of the Missouri, selected letters received. a. July 7, 1874-December 14, 1874 18. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Military Division of the Missouri, selected letters received. a. July 11, 1874-December 3, 1874 b. November 23, 1875 19. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Military Division of the Missouri, selected letters received. a. January 15, 1875-March 22, 1875 b. May 11, 1875 20. Records of the War Department, Headquarters of the United States Army, selected letters received. a. February 22, 1866 b. May 8, 1866-May 14, 1866 c. June 7, 1866 d. July 20, 1866 e. August 17, 1866 f. September 21, 1866-September 30, 1866 g. November 15, 1866 21. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Military Division of the Missouri, selected letters received. a. January 11, 1867-May 28, 1867 b. July 6, 1867-July 19, 1867 c. August 8, 1867 22. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Military Division of the Missouri, selected letters received. a. May 25, 1868 b. September 9, 1868-December 2, 1868 23. Records of the War Department, United States Army Commands, Military Division of the Missouri, selected letters received. a. April 14, 1873-July 30, 1873 b. October 9, 1873-December 3, 1873 c. February 17, 1874-March 18, 1874 d. May 18, 1874-May 29, 1874 e. July 5, 1874-July 18, 1874 24.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mathematics Is a Gentleman's Art: Analysis and Synthesis in American College Geometry Teaching, 1790-1840 Amy K
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2000 Mathematics is a gentleman's art: Analysis and synthesis in American college geometry teaching, 1790-1840 Amy K. Ackerberg-Hastings Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Higher Education and Teaching Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Ackerberg-Hastings, Amy K., "Mathematics is a gentleman's art: Analysis and synthesis in American college geometry teaching, 1790-1840 " (2000). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 12669. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/12669 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margwis, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. in the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Education of the Negro in the Military Department of the South, 1861-1965
    Education of the Negro in the military department of the South, 1861-1965 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Mount, Helen Frances, 1914- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 26/09/2021 05:28:32 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/317883 EDUCATION OF THE NEGRO IN THE MILITARY DEPARTMENT OF THE SOUTH, 1861-1865 by Helen F . Mount A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 5 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library» Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission^ provided that accurate acknowl­ edgment of source is made o Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the inter­ ests of scholarshipo In all other instances 9 however, permission must be obtained from the author <, SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: Professor of History TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Magazine of History
    INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY VOLUMEXXV DECEMBER, 1929 NUMBER4 The Burr Conspiracy In Indiana* By ISAACJ. Cox Indiana in the days of the Burr Conspiracy embraced a much larger area than today-at least technically. It extend- ed westward from the boundary of the recently-created state of Ohio to the Mississippi. The white settlements within this area were, it is true, few and scattering. The occasional clearings within the forests were almost wholly occupied by Indians slowly receding before the advance of a civilization that was too powerful for them. But sparse as was the popu- lation of the frontier territory when first created, its infini- tesimal average per square mile had been greatly lowered in 1804, for Congress had bestowed upon its governor the ad- ministration of that part of Louisiana that lay above the thirty-third parallel. As thus constituted, it was a region of boundless aspira- tions-a fitting stage for two distinguished travelers who journeyed through it the following year. Within its extended confines near the mouth of the Ohio lay Fort Massac, where in June, '1805, Burr held his mysterious interview with Wilkinson,' and also the cluster of French settlements from which William Morrison, the year before, had attempted to open trading relations with Santa Fe2-a project in which Wilkinson was to follow him. It was here that Willrinson, the second of this sinister pair, received from his predecessor a letter warning him against political factions in his new juris- diction.a By this act Governor Harrison emphasized not only his own personal experiences, but also the essential connection of the area with Hoosierdom.
    [Show full text]
  • De Witt Clinton and the Origin of the Spoils System in New York
    73] Cornell University Library JK 731.M2 ... De Witt Clinton and the origin of th 3 1924 002 312 662 SlrUDEES IN HISTORY, ECONOMIOS AND PUBLIC LAW EDITED BY THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Volume XXVIII] [Number 1 De WITT CLINTON AUD THE ORIGIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK HOWARD LEE McBAIN, Ph.D., /Sometime Honorary Fellow in Constitutional Lam, Colwmhia Univeriity THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, AGENTS London : P. S. King & Son 1907 THE LIBRARY OF THE NEW YORK STATE SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR RELATIONS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY 1 DeWITT CLINTON AND THE ORIOIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK Cornell University Library The original of tiiis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924002312662 STUDIES IN HISTORY, ECONOMICS AND PUBLIC LAW EDITED BY THE FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Volume XXVIII] [Number 1 De WITT CLINTON AND THE ORIGIN OF THE SPOILS SYSTEM IN NEW YORK HOWARD LEE McBAIN, Ph.D., Sometime Honorary Fellow in Constitutional Law, Colvmhia University THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS THE MACMILLAN COMPANY, AGENTS London : P. S. King & Son 1907 Copyright, 1907, BY HOWARD LEE McBAIN 1 JK 1S) CONTENTS CHAPTER I EARLY PATRONAGE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION PAGE Introduction 11-15 Misrepresentations of DeWitt Clinton's policies 11-12 Sources for study of 12 Plan of present study of New York patronage 13-15 Relation of systems previous to 1801 13 Relation of national systems I3~i5 Washington's policy of patronage 15-25 His problems differ from those of his successors 16-17 His attitude toward anti-adoptionists 17-20 In general 17-18 In Rhode Island 18-20 His consideration of Revolutionary services 20-21 His general principles in making appointments 21-23 Later consideration of politics in cabinet appointments 23-24 His New York appointments—Theory of Hamiltonian influencejrefuted.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Interact with History
    The port of New Orleans, Louisiana, a major center for the cotton trade 1820 James Monroe is 1817 reelected president. 1824 John Construction 1819 U.S. Quincy Adams begins on the acquires Florida 1820 Congress agrees to is elected Erie Canal. from Spain. the Missouri Compromise. president. USA 1815 WORLD 1815 1820 1825 1815 Napoleon 1819 Simón 1822 Freed 1824 is defeated at Bolívar becomes U.S. slaves Mexico Waterloo. president of found Liberia on becomes Colombia. the west coast a republic. of Africa. 210 CHAPTER 7 INTERACT WITH HISTORY The year is 1828. You are a senator from a Southern state. Congress has just passed a high tax on imported cloth and iron in order to protect Northern industry. The tax will raise the cost of these goods in the South and will cause Britain to buy less cotton. Southern states hope to nullify, or cancel, such federal laws that they consider unfair. Would you support the federal or state government? Examine the Issues • What might happen if some states enforce laws and others don't? • How can Congress address the needs of different states? •What does it mean to be a nation? RESEARCH LINKS CLASSZONE.COM Visit the Chapter 7 links for more information about Balancing Nationalism and Sectionalism. 1838 1828 Removal of Andrew 1836 Martin the Cherokee 1840 William Jackson 1832 Andrew Van Buren along the Henry Harrison is elected Jackson is elected Trail of Tears is elected president. is reelected. president. begins. president. 1830 1835 1840 1830 France 1833 British 1837 Victoria 1839 Opium invades Algeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Invention of a Slave
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Law Faculty Scholarly Articles Law Faculty Publications Winter 2018 Invention of a Slave Brian L. Frye University of Kentucky College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Repository Citation Frye, Brian L., "Invention of a Slave" (2018). Law Faculty Scholarly Articles. 619. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub/619 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Faculty Publications at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Invention of a Slave Notes/Citation Information Brian L. Frye, Invention of a Slave, 68 Syracuse L. Rev. 181 (2018). This article is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub/619 INVENTION OF A SLAVE Brian L. Fryet CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................ ..... 1 81 I. ANTEBELLUM REQUIREMENTS FOR PATENTABILITY ........... 183 II. ANTEBELLUM AFRICAN-AMERICAN PATENTS ....... ...... 185 III. INVENTION OF A SLAVE ............................... 1 87 A. Ned's "Double Plow and Scraper....... ....... 189 B. Benjamin T. Montgomery's "Canoe-Paddling" Propeller. ................................ 210 1. Benjamin T. Montgomery ............. ..... 210 2. Jefferson Davis's Attempt to PatentMontgomery's Propeller ......................... .... 212 3. Davis Bend During the Civil War...... ...... 213 4. Montgomery's Attempt to PatentHis Propeller... 214 5. Davis Bend After the Civil War ....
    [Show full text]
  • Choctaw and Creek Removals
    Chapter 6 Choctaw and Creek Removals The idea of indian removal as a government obligation first reared its head in 1802 when officials of the state of Georgia made an agreement with federal government officials. In the Georgia Compact, the state of Georgia gave up its claims to territorial lands west of that state in exchange for $1,250,000 and a promise that the federal government would abolish Indian title to Georgia lands as soon as possible. How seriously the government took its obligation to Georgia at the time of the agreement is unknown. The following year, however, the Louisiana Purchase was made, and almost immedi- ately, the trans-Mississippi area was seen by some as the answer to “The Indian Problem.” Not everyone agreed. Some congress- men argued that removal to the West was impractical because of land-hungry whites who could not be restrained from crossing the mighty river to obtain land. Although their conclusion was correct, it was probably made more in opposition to President Jefferson than from any real con- cern about the Indians or about practicality. Although some offers were made by government officials to officials of various tribes, little Pushmataha, Choctaw was done about removing the southeastern tribes before the War of 1812. warrior During that war several Indian tribes supported the British. After the war ended, many whites demanded that tribal lands be confiscated by Removals 67 the government as punishment for Indians’ treasonous activities. Many Americans included all tribes in their confiscationdemands , evidently feeling that all Indians were guilty, despite the fact that many tribes did not participate in the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Chronicles, a Civil War Commemorative Quilt
    Civil War Chronicles, a Civil War commemorative quilt Read more about history of women and the Civil War: http://library.mtsu.edu/tps/Women_and_the_Civil_War.pdf Women of the Quilt: 1. Mary Custis Lee was the wife of Robert E. Lee, the prominent career military officer who subsequently commanded the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia during the American Civil War. 2. Lizinka Campbell Ewell was the daughter of a Tennessee State senator who was also Minister to Russia under President James Monroe. In her second marriage, she married Confederate General Richard Ewell. 3. Arabella Griffith Barlow, Civil War Nurse and wife of General Francis Barlow, who spent much of the War treating wounded soldiers as part of the United States Sanitary Commission. 4. Jessie Benton Fremont, an American writer and political activist, wife of John C. Fremont, explorer of the American West and commander of the Western Region in the Civil War. 5. Mary Ann Montgomery Forrest, wife of Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, who followed her husband across many battlefields, described as “.. moving fro place to place as the scenes of the war shifted, like a true soldier.” 6. Julia Dent Grant was the wife of the 18th President of the United States, Ulysses S. Grant, and was First Lady of the United States from 1869 to 1877. 7. Maria Garland Longstreet, wife of Confederate general James Longstreet, was the daughter of General John Garland. 8. Susan Elston Wallace was an American author and poet from Crawfordsville, Indiana. In addition to writing travel articles for several American magazines and newspapers, she published six books, five of which contain collected essays from her travels in the New Mexico Territory, Europe, and the Middle East in the 1880s.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Years of Winter: the Cold Decade and Environmental
    TEN YEARS OF WINTER: THE COLD DECADE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN THE EARLY 19 TH CENTURY by MICHAEL SEAN MUNGER A DISSERTATION Presented to the Department of History and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Michael Sean Munger Title: Ten Years of Winter: The Cold Decade and Environmental Consciousness in the Early 19 th Century This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the Department of History by: Matthew Dennis Chair Lindsay Braun Core Member Marsha Weisiger Core Member Mark Carey Institutional Representative and Scott L. Pratt Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded June 2017 ii © 2017 Michael Sean Munger iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Michael Sean Munger Doctor of Philosophy Department of History June 2017 Title: Ten Years of Winter: The Cold Decade and Environmental Consciousness in the Early 19 th Century Two volcanic eruptions in 1809 and 1815 shrouded the earth in sulfur dioxide and triggered a series of weather and climate anomalies manifesting themselves between 1810 and 1819, a period that scientists have termed the “Cold Decade.” People who lived during the Cold Decade appreciated its anomalies through direct experience, and they employed a number of cognitive and analytical tools to try to construct the environmental worlds in which they lived. Environmental consciousness in the early 19 th century commonly operated on two interrelated layers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1931 Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30 1931 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON 1931 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington. D.C. - - - Price 25 cents (paper cover) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION CHARLES W. HUNT, Chairman. WILLIAM E HUMPHREY. CHARLES H. MARCH. EDGAR A. McCulloch. GARLAND S. FERGUSON, Jr. OTIS B. JOHNSON, Secretary. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIONER--1915-1931 Name State from which appointed Period of service Joseph E Davies Wisconsin Mar. 16, 1915-Mar. 18, 1918. William J. Harris Georgia Mar. 16, 1915-May 31, 1918. Edward N. Hurley Illinois Mar.16, 1915-Jan. 31, 1917. Will H. Parry Washington Mar.16, 1915-Apr. 21, 1917. George Rublee New Hampshire Mar.16, 1915-May 14, 1916. William B. Colver Minnesota Mar.16, 1917-Sept. 25, 1920. John Franklin Fort New Jersey Mar.16, 1917-Nov. 30, 1919. Victor Murdock Kansas Sept. 4, 1917-Jan. 31, 1924. Huston Thompson Colorado Jan.17, 1919-Sept. 25, 1926. Nelson B. Gaskill New Jersey Feb. 1, 1920-Feb. 24, 1925. John Garland Pollard Virginia Mar. 6, 1925-Sept. 25,1921. John F. Nugent Idaho Jan.15, 1921-Sept. 25, 1927 Vernon W. Van Fleet Indiana June 26, 1922-July 31, 1926. C. W. Hunt Iowa June 16, 1924. William E Humphrey Washington Feb.25, 1925. Abram F. Myers Iowa Aug. 2, 1926-Jan. 15, 1929. Edgar A. McCulloch Arkansas Feb.11, 1927. G. S. Ferguson, Jr North Carolina Nov.14, 1927. Charles H. March Minnesota Feb. 1, 1929. GENERAL OFFICES OF THE COMMISSION 1800 Virginia Avenue, NW., Washington BRANCH OFFICES 608 South Dearborn Street 45 Broadway Chicago New York 544 Market Street 431 Lyon Building San Francisco Seattle II CONTENTS PART I.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS MARCH 4, 1823, TO MARCH 3, 1825 FIRST SESSION—December 1, 1823, to May 27, 1824 SECOND SESSION—December 6, 1824, to March 3, 1825 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—DANIEL D. TOMPKINS, of New York PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE—JOHN GAILLARD, 1 of South Carolina SECRETARY OF THE SENATE—CHARLES CUTTS, of New Hampshire SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE—MOUNTJOY BAYLY, of Maryland SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES—HENRY CLAY, 2 of Kentucky CLERK OF THE HOUSE—MATTHEW ST. CLAIR CLARKE, 3 of Pennsylvania SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE HOUSE—THOMAS DUNN, of Maryland; JOHN O. DUNN, 4 of District of Columbia DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE—BENJAMIN BIRCH, of Maryland ALABAMA GEORGIA Waller Taylor, Vincennes SENATORS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES William R. King, Cahaba John Elliott, Sunbury Jonathan Jennings, Charlestown William Kelly, Huntsville Nicholas Ware, 8 Richmond John Test, Brookville REPRESENTATIVES Thomas W. Cobb, 9 Greensboro William Prince, 14 Princeton John McKee, Tuscaloosa REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Gabriel Moore, Huntsville Jacob Call, 15 Princeton George W. Owen, Claiborne Joel Abbot, Washington George Cary, Appling CONNECTICUT Thomas W. Cobb, 10 Greensboro KENTUCKY 11 SENATORS Richard H. Wilde, Augusta SENATORS James Lanman, Norwich Alfred Cuthbert, Eatonton Elijah Boardman, 5 Litchfield John Forsyth, Augusta Richard M. Johnson, Great Crossings Henry W. Edwards, 6 New Haven Edward F. Tattnall, Savannah Isham Talbot, Frankfort REPRESENTATIVES AT LARGE Wiley Thompson, Elberton REPRESENTATIVES Noyes Barber, Groton Samuel A. Foote, Cheshire ILLINOIS Richard A. Buckner, Greensburg Ansel Sterling, Sharon SENATORS Henry Clay, Lexington Ebenezer Stoddard, Woodstock Jesse B. Thomas, Edwardsville Robert P. Henry, Hopkinsville Gideon Tomlinson, Fairfield Ninian Edwards, 12 Edwardsville Francis Johnson, Bowling Green Lemuel Whitman, Farmington John McLean, 13 Shawneetown John T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aaron Burr Trial Claudia Bell
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research Winter 1967 The Aaron Burr Trial Claudia Bell Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Recommended Citation Bell, Claudia, "The Aaron Burr Trial" (1967). Honors Theses. Paper 398. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF RICHMOND LIBRARIES 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 3082 00688 8159 THE AARON BURR TRIAL by Claudia Bell typed by Susie Johnston Honors Paper December 19, 1967 PREFACE The Aaron Burr trial was one of the most interesting cases in American history. Not only was the testimony at the inquiry significant but all events leading to the trial were important. Only those occurrences in Burr 1 s life which led to his tria 1 a re des.crihe.d;-. since perronal situations have no bearing on the case. The trial itself has been clone with as nm.ch detail as possible in order to make the outcome of the inquest understandable. TABLE OF CDNTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. BACKGROUND • . • • • • • . • • . 1 II. INDICTMElIT B2FORE TP..E GR.Ai'JD JURY • . .13 III. TRIAL BUJRE THE PEI'IT JURY. • . .22 IV. SUhMARY. • . .33 FOOTNOTES. • . .37 BIBLIOGRAPHY • .43 CP.AP'I'ER 1 BAGKGROillm One of the most iT!T_!)Ortant events of 1807 was the .Aaron Burr trial. by the final day of the inquest a dispute between the judicial and exec- utive branches of the federal government had been brought to a head and the consr,ructive definition of treason had been negated.
    [Show full text]