World's Largest Wind Farm
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
RWE-Geschaeftsbericht-2011.Pdf
geschäFtsbericht 2011 finanzKalenDer 2012 /2013 2011 geschäftsbericht eCKDaten 2011 auf einen bliCK. RWE • Hohe Ergebnisbelastung durch beschleunigten Kernenergieausstieg in Deutschland 19. April 2012 Hauptversammlung • Betriebliches Ergebnis: 5,8 Mrd. € • Dividendenvorschlag: 2,00 € je Aktie 20. April 2012 Dividendenzahlung • Erste Maßnahmen zur Stärkung der Finanzkraft umgesetzt • Prognose 2012: Betriebliches Ergebnis trotz Desinvestitionen auf Vorjahreshöhe 10. Mai 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2012 RWE-Konzern 2011 2010 + /− in % 14. August 2012 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2012 Außenabsatz Strom Mrd. kWh 294,6 311,2 − 5,3 Außenabsatz Gas Mrd. kWh 322,2 395,4 − 18,5 14. November 2012 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2012 Außenumsatz Mio. € 51.686 53.320 − 3,1 EBITDA Mio. € 8.460 10.256 − 17,5 5. März 2013 Bericht über das Geschäftsjahr 2012 Betriebliches Ergebnis Mio. € 5.814 7.681 − 24,3 Ergebnis vor Steuern Mio. € 3.024 4.978 − 39,3 18. April 2013 Hauptversammlung Nettoergebnis /Ergebnisanteile der Aktionäre der RWE AG Mio. € 1.806 3.308 − 45,4 Nachhaltiges Nettoergebnis Mio. € 2.479 3.752 − 33,9 19. April 2013 Dividendenzahlung Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) % 10,9 14,4 - Kapitalkosten vor Steuern % 8,5 9,0 - 15. Mai 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Quartal 2013 Wertbeitrag Mio. € 1.286 2.876 − 55,3 Betriebliches Vermögen (Capital Employed) Mio. € 53.279 53.386 − 0,2 14. August 2013 Zwischenbericht über das erste Halbjahr 2013 Cash Flow aus laufender Geschäftstätigkeit Mio. € 5.510 5.500 0,2 Investitionen Mio. € 7.072 6.643 6,5 14. November 2013 Zwischenbericht über die ersten drei Quartale 2013 In Sachanlagen und immaterielle Vermögenswerte Mio. -
Integrated Offshore Networks: the Context of Our Work
Developing offshore grids : An integrated approach Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. Andrew Hiorns Integrated offshore networks: the context of our work Sustainability We are interested in establishing workable arrangements at the lowest costs for UK consumers such that: The potential deliverability of offshore wind is maximised Security of supply and network resilience are maximised The overall cost to consumers is minimised Affordability The scale of potential offshore a Offshore wind leased wind necessitates reflection on capacity* the delivery challenges: 1GW Security of supply 7GW European interconnection Technology development Security of 32GW supply Supply chain capability Planning consents Financing Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Skills * Source: DECC website 2 http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/what_we_do/uk_supply/energy_mix/renewable/policy/offshore/wind_leasing/wind_leasing.aspx 1 Assumptions: Generation mix scenarios 2008/09 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM AS AT 31st DECEMBER 2007 400kV Substations 275kV Substations Slow Progression 132kV Substations 400kV Circuits 275kV Circuits 132kV Circuits Major Generating Sites Including Pumped Storage Pentland Firth Connected at 400kV THE SHETLAND ISLANDS 6 Connected at 275kV 9,724MW offshore wind in 2020 Hydro Generation 23,174MW offshore wind in 2030 1 21% renewable electricity generation 2020 target missed 5 7 8 9 2 10 Gone Green 4 3 16,374MW offshore wind -
Länderprofil Großbritannien Stand: Juli / 2013
Länderprofil Großbritannien Stand: Juli / 2013 Impressum Herausgeber: Deutsche Energie-Agentur GmbH (dena) Regenerative Energien Chausseestraße 128a 10115 Berlin, Germany Telefon: + 49 (0)30 72 6165 - 600 Telefax: + 49 (0)30 72 6165 – 699 E-Mail: [email protected] [email protected] Internet: www.dena.de Die dena unterstützt im Rahmen der Exportinitiative Erneuerbare Energien des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) deutsche Unternehmen der Erneuerbare-Energien-Branche bei der Auslandsmarkterschließung. Dieses Länderprofil liefert Informationen zur Energiesituation, zu energiepolitischen und wirtschaftlichen Rahmenbedingungen sowie Standort- und Geschäftsbedingungen für erneuerbare Energien im Überblick. Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung, die nicht ausdrücklich vom Urheberrechtsgesetz zugelassen ist, bedarf der vorherigen Zustimmung der dena. Sämtliche Inhalte wurden mit größtmöglicher Sorgfalt und nach bestem Wissen erstellt. Die dena übernimmt keine Gewähr für die Aktualität, Richtigkeit, Vollständigkeit oder Qualität der bereitgestellten Informationen. Für Schäden materieller oder immaterieller Art, die durch Nutzen oder Nichtnutzung der dargebotenen Informationen unmittelbar oder mittelbar verursacht werden, haftet die dena nicht, sofern ihr nicht nachweislich vorsätzliches oder grob fahrlässiges Verschulden zur Last gelegt werden kann. Offizielle Websites www.renewables-made-in-germany.com www.exportinitiative.de Länderprofil Großbritannien – Informationen für -
ABLE Marine Energy Park (AMEP) ABLE Humber Port, East Coast, UK Establishing a New Offshore Wind Cluster
ABLE Marine Energy Park (AMEP) ABLE Humber Port, East Coast, UK Establishing a New Offshore Wind Cluster Information on AMEP to Support the Attraction of Offshore Wind Activity - 2021 Contents 3. Introduction 4. ABLE Marine Energy Park Aerial View 5. Location - Connectivity to Europe 6. Location - Road & Rail 7. Location - Proximity to Market 8. AMEP - The Offer 9. AMEP - Freeport Status 10. AMEP - Optimum Site Solutions 11. AMEP - Indicative Working Plan 12. AMEP - Offshore Wind Work Flow 13. Hornsea One Offshore Wind Farm 14. Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm 15. Dogger Bank Offshore Wind Farm 16. Planning - Fully Consented 17. Cost Reduction Opportunities 18. Wind Installation Vessels - Benefits 19. AMEP - Technical Specification 21. AMEP - Operating Model 22. AMEP - Competitive Advantage 23. Heavy Lift & Transport Services 24. The Humber Estuary Characteristics 25. Humber - Tees & Tyne Comparisons 27. Workforce - Productivity 28. Workforce - Availability 29. Production & Assembly - Workforce 31. Financial Support for Investment Document Reference: CM.NFE-AMEP-OSW-29 January 2021 Introduction ABLE Marine Energy Park (AMEP). Able Marine Energy Park (AMEP) is a port development on the south bank of the Humber Estuary on the East Coast of the United Kingdom. It is a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP) and is recognised as a core development within the UK Government Infrastructure Roadmap. The AMEP project base case involves developing Phase 1 with 1,349m of installation quays, 4no. installation yards (78.63 ha), with an additional 139 ha for manufacturer storage. It represents a singular opportunity for the UK to establish a world-scale industrial cluster and enable the UK to maximise the economic development potential provided by the combination of the emerging market and supportive policies. -
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited TRITON KNOLL
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited TRITON KNOLL ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Environmental Statement Volume 1 Chapter 1: Introduction April 2015, Revision A Document Reference: 6.2.1.1 Pursuant to: APFP Reg. 5(2)(a) Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Ltd Triton Knoll Electrical System Environmental Statement - Volume 1 Copyright © 2015 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited All pre-existing rights reserved. Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System Liability In preparation of this document Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited (TKOWFL), a joint venture between RWE Environmental Statement Innogy UK (RWE) and Statkraft UK, subconsultants working on behalf of TKOWFL have made reasonable efforts to Volume 1: Chapter 1 – Introduction ensure that the content is accurate, up to date and complete for the purpose for which it was prepared. Neither TKOWFL nor their subcontractors make any warranty as to the April 2015 accuracy or completeness of material supplied. Other than any liability on TKOWFL or their subcontractors detailed in the contracts between the parties for this work neither TKOWFL or their subcontractors shall have any liability for any loss, damage, injury, claim, expense, cost or other Drafted By: GoBe Consultants Ltd consequence arising as a result of use or reliance upon any information contained in or omitted from this document. Approved By: Kim Gauld-Clark Any persons intending to use this document should satisfy themselves as to its applicability for their intended purpose. Date of Approval April 2015 Where appropriate, the user of this document has the Revision A obligation to employ safe working practices for any activities referred to and to adopt specific practices appropriate to local conditions. -
Forecast from 2016-17 to 2019-20
Tariff Information Paper Forecast TNUoS tariffs from 2016/17 to 2019/20 This information paper provides a forecast of Transmission Network Use of System (TNUoS) tariffs from 2016/17 to 2019/20. These tariffs apply to generators and suppliers. This annual publication is intended to show how tariffs may evolve over the next five years. The forecast tariffs for 2016/17 will be refined throughout the year. 28 January 2015 Version 1.0 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary....................................................................................4 2. Five Year Tariff Forecast Tables ...............................................................5 2.1 Generation Tariffs ................................................................................. 5 2.2 Onshore Local Circuit Tariffs ..............................................................10 2.3 Onshore Local Substation Tariffs .......................................................12 Any Questions? 2.4 Offshore Local Tariffs .........................................................................12 2.5 Demand Tariffs ...................................................................................13 Contact: 3. Key Drivers for Tariff Changes................................................................14 Mary Owen 3.1 CMP213 (Project TransmiT)...............................................................14 Stuart Boyle 3.2 HVDC Circuits.....................................................................................14 3.3 Contracted Generation .......................................................................15 -
Transmission Networks Connections Update
Transmission Networks Connections Update May 2015 SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO SHE-T–TO SPT–TO NG–TO/SO Back to Contents TNCU – May 2015 Page 01 Contents Foreword ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 02 1. Introduction /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 03 2. Connection timescales ///////////////////////////////////////////// 04 Illustrative connection timescales /////////////////////////////////////// 04 Connections by area /////////////////////////////////////////////////////// 05 3. GB projects by year ///////////////////////////////////////////////// 06 Contracted overall position /////////////////////////////////////////////// 08 Renewable projects status by year ///////////////////////////////////// 10 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Excluding Nuclear /// 11 Non-Renewable projects status by year – Nuclear only ////////// 12 Interconnector projects status by year //////////////////////////////// 13 4. Additional data by transmission owner ///////////////////////// 14 National Grid Electricity Transmission plc //////////////////////////// 16 Scottish Hydro Electricity Transmission plc ////////////////////////// 18 Scottish Power Transmission Limited ///////////////////////////////// 20 5. Connection locations /////////////////////////////////////////////// 22 Northern Scotland projects map //////////////////////////////////////// 25 Southern Scotland projects map /////////////////////////////////////// 28 Northern England projects map ///////////////////////////////////////// -
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System …………………………………………………
Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System ………………………………………………… Appendix 22: Updated Statement of Reasons – Comparison of Revision C with Revision B Date: 24th February 2016 Appendix 22 of the Applicant’s Response to Deadline 7 Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Electrical System Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited 4th Floor One Kingdom Street Triton Knoll Electrical System Paddington Central London W2 6BD Appendix 22: Updated Statement of Reasons – T: 0845 026 0562 Comparison of Revision C with Revision B Email: [email protected] www.rweinnogy.com/tritonknoll Appendix 22 of the Applicant’s Response to Deadline 7 Date: 24th February 2016 Drafted By: TKOWFL Approved By: Kim Gauld-Clark Date of Approval: 24/02/2016 Revision: BC Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Limited Copyright © 2015 RWE Innogy UK Ltd All pre-existing rights reserved Triton Knoll Offshore Wind Farm Ltd Triton Knoll Electrical System Statement of Reasons CONTENTS Field Code Changed CONTENTS .................................................................................................................. 1 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 Field Code Changed Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Field Code Changed 2 THE APPLICATION ................................................................................................. -
Facts & Figures
RWE INNOGY FACTS & FIGURES – OFFSHORE WIND & GWYNT Y MÔR OFFSHORE WIND FARM Strong growth off the coast RWE Innogy is a market leader in the development, construction and operation of offshore wind farms in Europe. We have already gained significant experience through the delivery and operation of our existing wind farms – North Hoyle and Rhyl Flats off the Welsh coast, and Thornton Bank off the Belgian coast. Our first German project – Nordsee Ost – is due to start construction next year, some 22 miles off the island of Helgoland. In addition, we aim to be using our own construction vessels from 2011 onwards. RWE Innogy has major plans for the future for offshore development and for helping tackle climate change through its pipeline offshore wind portfolio . A list of current projects: RWE Innogy’s Offshore Wind Projects In operation: North Hoyle 1) (UK/60 MW) Dogger Bank 5) (9.000 MW) Rhyl Flats (UK/90 MW) Triton Knoll (1.200 MW) Thornton Bank 2) (Belgium/30 MW) North Hoyle 1) (60 MW) Nordsee Ost (295 MW) Under construction: Innogy Nordsee 1 Greater Gabbard 3) (UK/504 MW) Gwynt y Môr 4) (576 MW) (about 1.000 MW) Investment/construction decision granted: Rhyl Flats (90 MW) Tromp Binnen (300 MW) Nordsee Ost (Germany/295 MW) Atlantic Array (1.500 MW) 4) Gwynt y Môr (UK/576 MW) Thornton Bank 2) (30 MW) 3) Project pipeline: Greater Gabbard (504 MW) Thornton Bank 2 & 3 (Belgium/295 MW) Galloper 3) (500 MW) Innogy Nordsee 1 (Germany/approx. 1,000 MW) Projects in operation or under construction Triton Knoll (UK/1,200 MW) Projects consented or in development 3) Galloper (UK/500 MW) 1) North Hoyle offshore windfarm (60 MW) is owned by Zephyr Investments Ltd. -
Sofia Ground Model Developed by NGI Not Confidential
EV108 Sofia ground model developed by NGI Not confidential Sofia Offshore Wind Farm Limited 154 - Synthetic CPTs from Intelligent Ground Models based on the integration of geology, geotechnics and geophysics as a tool for conceptual foundation design and soil investigation planning CF Forsberg, T Lunne and M Vanneste Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway L James Forewind, UK/RPS, UK TI Tjelta Forewind, UK /Statoil, Norway A Barwise Statkraft UK Ltd. / RWE Innogy UK Ltd C Duffy Forewind, UK/Statkraft UK Ltd. Abstract Early phase soil investigation campaigns do not as a rule include all the locations where infrastructure is to be placed on the seafloor. However, background information on geology, bathymetric and seismic data may be available across the area at an early stage. The combination of these datasets thus provides the basis for devel- oping a ground model of the development area. The inclusion of geotechnical data in such ground models is not always straightforward since geotechnical properties may vary laterally and with depth. In this paper we present an "Intelligent Ground Model", developed at NGI, and used at several large wind farm projects. The model combines interpreted seismic horizons with geological understanding and acquired CPTU data to allow synthetic CPTUs to be generated at any location within the investigated area. In the Dogger Bank wind farm area, synthetic CPTUs were generated at numerous locations to guide initial evaluations of foundation require- ments and to group locations with similar synthetic profiles. The model was tested by removing known CPTU data from the database and comparing them to synthetic results from the same locations. -
Concrete Support Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends
energies Review Concrete Support Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends Alexandre Mathern 1,2,* , Christoph von der Haar 3 and Steffen Marx 4 1 Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Sven Hultins Gata 6, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden 2 Research and Innovation, NCC AB, Lilla Bomen 3c, SE-41104 Gothenburg, Sweden 3 grbv Ingenieure im Bauwesen GmbH & Co. KG, Expo Plaza 10, 30539 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] 4 Institute of Concrete Structures, Technische Universität Dresden, August-Bebel-Straße 30/30A, 01219 Dresden, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: Today’s offshore wind turbine support structures market is largely dominated by steel structures, since steel monopiles account for the vast majority of installations in the last decade and new types of multi-leg steel structures have been developed in recent years. However, as wind turbines become bigger, and potential sites for offshore wind farms are located in ever deeper waters and ever further from the shore, the conditions for the design, transport, and installation of support structures are changing. In light of these facts, this paper identifies and categorizes the challenges and future trends related to the use of concrete for support structures of future offshore wind projects. To do so, recent advances and technologies still under development for both bottom-fixed and floating concrete support structures have been reviewed. It was found that these new developments meet the Citation: Mathern, A.; von der Haar, challenges associated with the use of concrete support structures, as they will allow the production C.; Marx, S. -
Planning Statement
Dogger Bank C/Sofia Onshore Works Application Planning Statement Classification: N/A Status: ISSUE Expiry date: N/A 1 of 44 Classification: N/A Status: ISSUE Expiry date: N/A 2 of 44 Doc. No. Rev. no. 01 Planning Statement Valid from: July 2020 Table of contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................5 1.1 Purpose of the Report ......................................................................................................................................5 1.2 The Development .............................................................................................................................................5 1.3 The Site and its Surroundings ..........................................................................................................................5 1.4 Planning History ...............................................................................................................................................6 2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................................6 2.1 Overview ..........................................................................................................................................................6 3 Planning Policy Framework ..........................................................................................................................6 3.1