2017 State of the System Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2017 State of the System Report 2017 STATE OF THE SYSTEM 2017 State of the System Report Space Coast Transportation Planning Organization Brevard County, Florida Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 225 E. Robinson Street, Suite 355 Orlando, FL 32801 (407) 540-0555 Project No. 20741.02 October 2018 i The preparation of this report has been financed in part through grant(s) from the Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title 23, U.S. Code. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... ix Countywide Performance Measures ........................................................................................................................................... ix Countywide Trends ..................................................................................................................................................................... ix Countywide Safety ....................................................................................................................................................................... x Introduction…………….. ................................................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Monitoring Mobility within the SOS Network ............................................................................................................................. 2 Performance Measurement ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Corridor Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Corridor Congestion .................................................................................................................................... 10 Countywide Demographics ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Countywide Vehicular Mobility ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Countywide Freight Traffic ........................................................................................................................................................ 25 Countywide Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................................. 29 Corridor Congestion Analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 31 Evacuation Route Monitoring ..................................................................................................................... 35 ITS Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................................... 41 Multi-Modal Mobility .................................................................................................................................. 46 Countywide Transit Mobility ..................................................................................................................................................... 46 Corridor Transit Ridership Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 51 Countywide Airport, Port, and Spaceport Trends ..................................................................................................................... 54 Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities ........................................................................................................................ 62 Countywide Safety ....................................................................................................................................... 70 Countywide Safety Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 70 Crash Frequency Analysis .......................................................................................................................................................... 72 Crash Severity Analysis .............................................................................................................................................................. 78 FDOT Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Emphasis Areas .................................................................................................... 85 Corridor Pedestrian/Bicycle Crash Analysis ............................................................................................................................... 92 Corridor Vehicular Crash Analysis ............................................................................................................................................. 97 Countywide Performance Measures ......................................................................................................... 103 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Congestion Management System Process Diagram ........................................................................ 4 Figure 2 SOS Roadway Network .................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3 Planning Subareas ........................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 4 Brevard County and Florida Population Growth Rates (2008 to 2017)......................................... 11 Figure 5 Regional Population Growth Rates (2008 to 2017) ....................................................................... 12 Figure 6 Brevard County Total Vehicle Registrations (2013 to 2017) ......................................................... 12 Figure 7 2017 SIS Roadway AADTs .............................................................................................................. 14 Figure 8 2016 – 2017 SIS AADT Change ....................................................................................................... 15 Figure 9 I-95 Traffic Volumes – AADT (2013 to 2017) ................................................................................. 16 Figure 10 SR 528 Traffic Volumes – AADT (2013 to 2017) .......................................................................... 17 Figure 11 I-95 Congested and Uncongested Lane Miles (2013 to 2017) .................................................... 17 Figure 12 SR 528 Congested and Uncongested Lane Miles (2013 to 2017) ................................................ 18 Figure 13 2017 Non-SIS Roadway AADTs .................................................................................................... 19 Figure 14 2016 – 2017 Non-SIS AADT Change ............................................................................................. 20 Figure 15 Planning Subarea Roadways Vehicle Miles Traveled (2013 to 2017) .......................................... 21 Figure 16 VMT and VMT per Capita on SOS Roadway Segments (2013 to 2017) ....................................... 22 Figure 17 Top 20 Busiest Intersections along SOS Roadways ..................................................................... 24 Figure 18 Truck AADTs (2013 to 2017) ........................................................................................................ 26 Figure 19 2017 Truck AADTs ........................................................................................................................ 27 Figure 20 2016 – 2017 Truck AADT Change ................................................................................................ 28 Figure 21 Top 25 Congested Corridors ........................................................................................................ 33 Figure 22 Hurricane Evacuation Routes ...................................................................................................... 36 Figure 23 Evacuation Routes without Existing CCTV’s ................................................................................ 37 Figure 24 Top 25 Evacuation Route Corridors with Only Partial Existing CCTV’s ........................................ 38 Figure 25 Corridors without Existing ITS Infrastructure Data Source: SCTPO ITS Master Plan ................... 43 Figure 26 Top 13 Corridors with Only Partial Existing ITS Infrastructure .................................................... 44 Figure 27 Space Coast Area Transit Overall Annual Transit Ridership (2013 to 2017) ............................... 46 iv Figure 28 Space Coast Area Transit System ...............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC
    COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATIONFAA/AST Staff ADVISORY COMMITTEE October 2020 Membership Major General James Armor, USAF (Ret) CEO, The Armor Group Ms. Sharon L. Pinkerton Senior Vice President, Legislative and Regulatory Policy Dr. Greg Autry Airlines for America Vice President of Space Development National Space Society Mr. Lee Rosen Vice President of Customer Operations and Integration Mr. Bill Beckman Space Exploration Technologies Director, NASA Programs The Boeing Company Ms. Robbie Sabathier Vice President, Government Operations & Strategic Communications Major General Edward L. Bolton, USAF (Ret) United Launch Alliance Former FAA Assistant Administrator Mr. Eric Stallmer Hon. Shana Dale President Board Member Commercial Spaceflight Federation Firefly Black, LLC Ms. Charity Weeden Mr. Paul E. Damphousse Vice President of Global Space Policy Vice President of Business Development Astroscale U.S., Inc. Calspan Holdings, LLC Ms. Ann Zulkosky Dr. Mary Lynne Dittmar Director President & CEO Lockheed Martin Corporation The Coalition for Deep Space Exploration Ms. Karina Drees CEO and General Manager Mojave Air and Space Port Mr. Mike French Vice President, Space Systems Aerospace Industries Association Mr. Christopher C. Hassler President & CEO Syndetics Inc. Mr. Dale Ketcham Vice President, Government & External Relations Space Florida Ms. Kate Kronmiller Vice President of Government Relations Jacobs Mr. Steven Lindsey Senior Vice President of Strategy and Programs Sierra Nevada Corporation Space Systems Mr. Mike Moses President Virgin Galactic Mr. Clay Mowry Vice President, Sales, Marketing & Customer Experience Blue Origin Mr. Dale K. Nash CEO and Executive Director Virginia Commercial Space Flight Authority .
    [Show full text]
  • University of Central Florida Is First to Conduct Microgravity Research Via Nanoracks on ISS, and in Suborbital Space, Via Blue Origin
    University of Central Florida is First to Conduct Microgravity Research via NanoRacks on ISS, and in suborbital space, via Blue Origin April 13, 2016-Webster, TX—Researchers at the University of Central Florida (UCF) have become the first- ever team to experiment on both NanoRacks’ commercial research lab onboard the International Space Station (ISS) and in suborbital space on Blue Origin’s New Shepard space vehicle. The UCF team, lead by physics professor and Assistant Director of the Florida Space Institute, Dr. Josh Colwell, is conducting this in-space research as part of a broad research program to understand the early stages of planet formation, the surfaces of asteroids, and the evolution of planetary rings. NanoRocks, an experiment launched via NanoRacks on SpaceX-4 in 2014, has been studying particle collisions to better understand how developing planets get from just centimeters across to much larger objects, known as planetesimals, which are able to gravitationally attract to each other and form full size planets. NanoRocks was a winner of the Space Florida ISS Research Competition, and is now scheduled to return to Earth on SpaceX-8 Dragon. COLLIDE, launched on Blue Origin’s fourth mission, explores phenomena that are masked or suppressed by Earth’s gravity. In free-fall, UCF is able to explore collisions such as those in the early stages of planet formation, and the behavior of space dust on small asteroids and moons that have a much weaker gravitational pull than Earth. NanoRacks is thrilled to be involved with Dr. Colwell’s team as a flagship program exploring long term- microgravity exposure on ISS, and hopes to be involved with the team as they continue to explore in suborbital and orbital space.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Information & Resources
    Space Transportation Infrastructure Matching Fund Program Information & Resources For Projects Starting Florida Fiscal Year 2023 – 2027 (July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2027) 1 Introduction 2 Tentative Schedule 3 Goals & Objectives 4 Statutory Requirements and Policy Mandates 5 Definitions 6 Project Eligibility Memo 1 Introduction The Space Transportation Infrastructure Matching Fund Application is used to solicit proposals to continue the development of space transportation infrastructure that supports Space Florida’s legislative intent and Florida spaceport territory master plans. Space Florida is designated in section 331.3011(3), Florida Statutes, to be the “single point of contact for state aerospace-related activities with federal agencies, the military, state agencies, businesses, and the private sector.” Space Florida will use the qualifying applications to develop a proposed list of spaceport discretionary capacity improvement projects for submission to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). Priorities are based on the 2018 Florida Spaceport System Plan, which reflects a sustainability framework to guide public and private investment into Florida’s emerging and growing aerospace sector. Like other transportation modes, FDOT encourages spaceports to use Spaceport Improvement Program funds for projects that ensure financial sustainability and place a priority on projects that are common use and used by multiple partners. Prioritized spaceport projects may be included in the FDOT five-year work program of transportation improvement projects. The application is mandatory before Space Florida can prioritize candidate projects for available funding. Projects are evaluated primarily on the following characteristics and applicants should address these items in their narrative: 1. Long term commitment to the State of Florida 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Official MISSION KIT We Will Turn Our Faces to the Sun, and Our Dreams to the Stars
    official MISSION KIT We will turn our faces to the sun, and our dreams to the stars. We will take selfies with America’s icons, and shake hands with its heroes. We will marvel at humanity’s past, and glimpse AT what its future holds. We will explore everything from the Atlantic to Atlantis, stopping only to watch the sun go down and the rockets go up. Most of all, we will collect experiences just as surely as we collect shells. Because we are Vacationauts. And in Florida, more than anywhere else in the world, wE ARE GO. MEDIA CONTACTS Florida: Tara Tufo, 646.468.8834, [email protected] NYC: Terry Preston, 917.494.5313, [email protected] BE A VACATIONAUT! 4 MULTI-MEDIA CAMPAIGN 7 The VACATIONAUT COMMUNITY 8 BADGES, RANKS and MORE 13 DESTINATION SPACE: COLLECTIBLE POSTERS 25 The FUTURE of SPACE TOURISM is NEAR 28 KNOW Your LAUNCH VEHICLES 30 SPACE TIMELINE 32 The WORLD’S GATEWAY to SPACE 35 ATLANTIC to ATLANTIS 36 ABOUT WE ARE GO 39 ABOUT SPACE FLORIDA 40 ABOUT PARADISE ADVERTISING 43 All DIGITAL ASSETS ARE LOCATED ON ENCLOSED USB CARD 3 BE A VACATIONAUT! The quest to explore space has inspired countless generations, and this pursuit is still alive and thriving in Florida — America’s iconic launch pad to the stars. The desire to break one’s earthly bonds is the foundation of We Are Go’s new Vacationauts campaign. 4 We Are Go, Space Florida’s consumer facing brand, is looking for the next generation of recreational space explorers — the Vacationauts! Their mission is to make space a part of their epic Florida vacation.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Space Exploration ​ Objective: Students Will Be Able To: 1
    Lesson Topic: Effects of Space Exploration ​ Objective: Students will be able to: 1. Identify and describe how space exploration affects the state of Florida. 2. Describe the nature of the Kennedy Space Center. 3. Identify the components of a space shuttle 4. Apply the importance of space exploration to the Florida culture through design. Time Required: 75 minutes ​ Materials Needed: ● Teacher computer with internet access ● Projector/Smartboard ● 1 computer/laptop/iPad per student with internet access ● Effects of Space Exploration handout (attached) ● Space Exploration Video: Escape Velocity - A Quick History of Space Exploration ​ ● Space Shuttle Website: Human Space Flight (HSF) - Space Shuttle ​ ● Kennedy Space Center Website: Visit Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex at ​ Cape Canaveral ● Coloring pencils/Markers Teacher Preparation: ● Assign a Legends of Learning Content Review Quick Play playlist for the day(s) you ​ ​ will be teaching the lesson. ○ Content Review - Middle School - Effects of Space Exploration ● Make copies of Effects of Space Exploration Worksheet (1 per student) Engage (10 minutes): 1. Pass out the Effects of Space Exploration Handout. 2. Ask students “What do you know about space exploration? a. Draw the words “Space Exploration” on the board with a circle around it. i. As students share their answers write their answers on the board and link them to the Space Exploration circle with a line. 3. Tell students “We are going to watch a short video about the history of space exploration and how it has evolved over time. In the space provided on the handout, jot down any notes that you find interesting or important. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Space Grant Consortium Lead Institution: University of Central Florida Director: Dr
    Florida Space Grant Consortium Lead Institution: University of Central Florida Director: Dr. Jaydeep Mukherjee Telephone Number: 407-823-6177 Consortium URL: www.floridaspacegrant.org Grant Number: NNX10AM01H PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The National Space Grant College and Fellowship Program consists of 52 state-based, university-led Space Grant Consortia in each of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Annually, each consortium receives funds to develop and implement student fellowships and scholarships programs; interdisciplinary space-related research infrastructure, education, and public service programs; and cooperative initiatives with industry, research laboratories, and state, local, and other governments. Space Grant operates at the intersection of NASA’s interest as implemented by alignment with the Mission Directorates and the state’s interests. Although it is primarily a higher education program, Space Grant programs encompass the entire length of the education pipeline, including elementary/secondary and informal education. The Florida Space Grant Consortium is a Designated Consortium funded at a level of $575,000 for fiscal year 2013. PROGRAM GOALS FELLOWSHIPS & SCHOLARSHIPS 1. Enable students to pursue careers in the space program – whether through graduate, undergraduate, or Community College technical training. SMART Objective – On an annual basis, at least 20 undergraduate and/or technical training awards and 3 graduate fellowships will be competitively awarded to students who wish to pursue space/aerospace/aeronautics training. At least six of these awards will be offered to minority candidates and at least 8 to female students. At least 70% of awardees will continue to the next step in their chosen STEM disciplines (academia/NASA/industry).
    [Show full text]
  • North Brevard Economic Development Zone Summary
    NORTH BREVARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ZONE SUMMARY MISSION STATEMENT The North Brevard Economic Development Zone (or, the “Zone”) special dependent district works in conjunction with various economic development organizations at the local, state, or national level to drive commerce and economic development in the northern part of the County through targeted investments that directly and demonstrably result in the creation and/or retention of quality employment and capital investment, thereby increasing employment in the county and aiding in the long-term expansion and diversification of the tax base. By inducing economic development activities to go forward, through financial and/or technical assistance, the Zone helps to increase economic opportunities for the residents of Brevard County. PROGRAMS AND SERVICES ACCOMPLISHMENTS, INITIATIVES, TRENDS AND ISSUES AND SERVICE LEVEL IMPACTS: NORTH BREVARD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ZONE (The Zone): • Advance commerce and industry in the northern portion of the county • Promote the advantages of the local economy to corporate real estate (CRE) professionals and the national site consultant community • Increase the diversification of the economy through the recruitment and development of unique industry types • Operate an economic incentive program to drive economic development in the northern portion of the county, with a focus on creating new job opportunities and increasing capital investment in the area • Pursue strategic initiatives designed to improve the economic assets of the region, including
    [Show full text]
  • NEPA Analysis of the Proposed Shiloh Launch Complex
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge NEPA Analysis of the Proposed Shiloh Launch Complex Introduction Space Florida is proposing a private launch facility in the Shiloh area, which is on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA’s) Kennedy Space Center (KSC) and Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (NWR). The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is preparing an Environment Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the construction and operation of the proposed Shiloh Launch Complex. This proposed project would include vertical launch facilities and associated space vehicle processing, launch, and recovery operations on approximately 200 acres of the Merritt Island NWR. The proposed Pine Flatwoods in the Shiloh area, credit USFWS/Jim Lyon project would consist of one contiguous parcel, or two separate parcels, totaling no more than 200 gross acres. Up to 12 Background At Merritt Island NWR, the Service launches per year for each developed pad The Shiloh area is part of Merritt Island has an interest in wildlife and habitat (for a total of up to 24 launches) and static NWR, which is managed by the U.S. Fish management activities on, adjacent to, on-pad engine firings would be planned and Wildlife Service (Service) and was and potentially impacted by the proposed for this proposed launch complex. established in 1963 by agreement with project. NASA to manage the nonoperational areas of KSC for migratory birds and Beyond the refuge, the Service also other wildlife. The refuge totals 140,000 has statutory and trust responsibilities acres with 34,000 acres co-managed with related to this proposed project.
    [Show full text]
  • CSF Research and Education Fall 2014
    Subscribe Share Past Issues Translate Commercial Spaceflight Federation Newsletter View this email in your browser CSF REM Affiliates, I wanted to start by saying that I look forward to working closely with all of you in my new role as CSF President! I would like to schedule a REM Affiliates call next month which will be a great opportunity for me to get to know everyone further. Please fill out this doodle poll to let us know when you are available for the call: http://doodle.com/m92k5u7ipvz4k8ay. We held our semi-annual CSF Board and Members Meetings September 9-10 in Jacksonville, FL. A lot of great developments came out of the meetings that I believe will continue to move our organization in the right direction. The Board of Directors elected Frank DiBello, President and CEO of Space Florida, as the new CSF Chairman succeeding Stu Witt, the CEO of Mojave Air and Space Port. The Board also elected Mike Gold of Bigelow Aerospace and Sean Mahoney of Masten Space Systems to the Executive Committee. Additionally, October marked the beginning of a few staffing changes here at CSF. Tommy Sanford assumed the role of Director on October 1st. Additionally, Mike L-A has left CSF as of September 30th; we can't thank him enough for his service not just to the Federation, but to the industry as a whole. Please feel free to reach out to me by email at eric.stallmer@commercialspaceflight.org or by phone at 202-715-2925. I look forward to talking with you all soon! Sincerely, Eric EDUCATION NEWS AND CONTESTS NASA Space Technology Research Fellowships (NSTRF) – Fall 2015 Due: November 13, 2014 This call for graduate student fellowship applications solicits applications from individuals pursuing or planning to pursue master’s (e.g., M.S.) or doctoral (e.g., Ph.D.) degrees in relevant space technology disciplines at accredited U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Florida Board of Directors Meeting Agenda January 14, 2021
    Space Florida Board of Directors Meeting Agenda January 14, 2021 1:30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Call-in Number: 866-528-2256 Teleconference Guest Code: 4875556 # Agenda Items Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance Lt. Gov. Nuñez Roll Call Elizabeth Loving Welcome & Introductions Lt. Gov. Nuñez Public Comments Lt. Gov. Nuñez Board of Directors Board Committees 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Lt. Gov. Nuñez Minutes October 22, 2020 2. COMMITTEE REPORTS Audit & Accountability Committee Denise Swanson • Interim Financials September 30, 2020 Governance and Compensation Committee Howard Haug Investment Committee Jay Beyrouti Marketing Committee Sonya Deen 3. BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD Frank DiBello Project Kit and Project Chariot Howard Haug Project Rising Tide Project Poseidon Cape Canaveral Spaceport Electrical Capacity Improvements, Phase 2 SLLF Airfield Improvements Refurbishment and Restoration of CCS Area 57 West Launch Processing Facilities Common Use Infrastructure Improvements at LC-20 Space Life Sciences Lab Investment Grade Audit GTOPS, Inc. Spaceport Strategies, Inc. Venture X Group, Inc. 4. PRESIDENT’S REPORT Frank DiBello Recap of 2020 Highlights A Look Ahead Financial Advisor Space Force Update INFRAgrant Update Recap of Strategy Reset Closing Remarks / Adjournment Lt. Gov. Nuñez 1/20 Separator Page Board of Directors 2/20 SPACE FLORIDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Lieutenant Governor Jeanette Nuñez -Chairman of the Board Executive Office of the Governor Jay Beyrouti President, Monicarla, Ltd. Jesse Biter President/CEO, Biter Enterprises, LLC. Dean Cannon President & CEO, Gray Robinson Gregory Celestan Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Celestar Dan Davis President & CEO of JAX Chamber Sonya Deen Vice President of Government Relations, JM Family Enterprises, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Cecil Spaceport Master Plan 2012
    March 2012 Jacksonville Aviation Authority Cecil Spaceport Master Plan Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Project Background ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 History of Spaceport Activities ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.3 Purpose of the Master Plan ............................................................................................ 1-3 1.4 Strategic Vision .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.5 Market Analysis .............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.6 Competitor Analysis ....................................................................................................... 1-6 1.7 Operating and Development Plan................................................................................... 1-8 1.8 Implementation Plan .................................................................................................... 1-10 1.8.1 Phasing Plan ......................................................................................................... 1-10 1.8.2 Funding Alternatives ............................................................................................. 1-11 CHAPTER 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Spaceport Network Development Plan
    SPfciCEPORT ALLIANCE National Spaceport Network Development Plan Prepared by the Global Spaceport Alliance for the Office of Spaceports Office of Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration June 1, 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Space has become an indispensable part of everyday life in the 21st century, supporting not only our nation's military and intelligence capabilities, but also communications, navigation, weather forecasting, agriculture, financial transactions, disaster response, and even entertainment. The Eastern Range, located at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida, and the Western Range, located at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, have served as the military's primary launch sites for space launches and missile tests for more than 60 years. Many NASA and commercial space missions have also been conducted from those locations. Recently however, a number of commercial spaceports have been established by state and local governments, or by private companies, based on a desire to take advantage of the growing space economy, to minimize the federal regulatory burden, and to provide additional launch opportunities for civil and commercial space missions. The development of a National Spaceport Network, consisting of current and prospective commercial spaceports, government-owned-and-operated launch & landing sites, and privately- owned-and-operated launch & landing sites, offers an opportunity to increase the safety, capacity, efficiency, and resiliency of the nation's space operations. Such a network could provide the framework for formal or informal public-private partnerships between federal, state, and local governments; the aerospace industry; and academia. A key component of the operation of a successful network of spaceports is federal funding for infrastructure development.
    [Show full text]