CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH Gender and ethnic differences in pterygium prevalence: an audit of remote Australian clinics Clin Exp Optom 2020 DOI:10.1111/cxo.13081 Aisling B McGlacken-Byrne* MB BCh Clinical relevance: Developing an accurate picture of the demographic profile and refrac- BAO tive status of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal individuals with pterygium will facilitate health † Jocelyn J Drinkwater MPH planning and appropriate deployment of health-care resources in rural Australia. ‡ David A Mackey* MD FRANZCO Background: To date, there is a paucity of reports in the literature regarding Aboriginal ‡ Angus W Turner* MSc FRANZCO ocular health and refractive error. This study examines clinical data from a rural ophthal- *Lions Outback Vision, Lions Eye Institute, Perth, mology outreach clinic – a predominantly Aboriginal population. Australia Methods: An assessment was undertaken of data of 293 patients noted to have pterygium † School of Medicine, The University of Western present in at least one eye, from a sample of 2,072 individuals seen in rural northern West- Australia, Perth, Australia ern Australia in 2017 by the Lions Outback Vision Visiting Optometry Service. ‡ Centre of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The Results: Pterygium was found in 14.1 per cent (n = 293) of patients using the Lions Outback University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia Vision service. The mean age of those with pterygium (n = 293) was 57.1 Æ 11.9 years E-mail:
[email protected] (mean Æ standard deviation); 188 were female (64.1 per cent); 260 identified as Aboriginal (88.7 per cent), 22 identified as non-Aboriginal (7.5 per cent) and 11 did not specify (3.8 per cent).