Digital Versus Film for Travel Photography, 2009 I Began Using 35Mm Film in 1978 and Switched to Digital Cameras After 2004
Digital versus Film for Travel Photography, 2009 I began using 35mm film in 1978 and switched to digital cameras after 2004. This article explains why. by Tom Dempsey, creator of PhotoSeek.com October 21, 2011 Summary A. Advantages of Digital 1. Slow Film Work Flow 2. Fast Digital Work Flow 3. Compact versus SLR B. Disadvantages C. Film versus Digital Camera Table 2007 Summary The instant feedback of a digital camera will improve your photography much more quickly than a film camera. Digital cameras have overcome the disadvantages of earlier models and have surpassed 35mm film. Digital cameras offer new capabilities beyond film, such as instant image feedback, an informative histogram of light values, white balance control, and powerful RAW file adjustments which can recover highlights & shadows after shooting. Some photographers prefer film for long exposures, for extra quality in poster-sized prints (requiring expensive professional scan), and for other artistic reasons. But just two years of using portable digital cameras convinced me to forgo film. Publishable pictures can come from almost any Trees reflect in Tidal River, at Wilson's Promontory National Park, Australia. camera. Good photography comes from you, not from the camera. A virtuoso violinist can make The joy of using a Canon PowerShot G5 digital camera convinced me to quit using film. any violin sing. A great Stradivarius violin won't make a beginner play any better. Lightweight digital cameras for travel improved quickly from 2003 to 2009: o In spring 2007, my Nikon D40X SLR camera was mounted with the Nikkor 18-200mm VR lens, together weighing 38 ounces.
[Show full text]