DOCSLIB.ORG

The Planning Inspectorate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Planning Inspectorate The Planning Inspectorate Room 406 / Kite Wing Direct Line 0117-372 8902 Temple Quay House Switchboard 0117-372 8000 2 The Square Fax No 0117-372 6241 Temple Quay GTN 1371-8902 Bristol BS1 6PN e-mail: [email protected] http://www.planning-inspectorate.gov.uk Petar Kanuritch Your Reference: Bob Wilson Director of Environment and Development Our Reference: DP000431/N3020 Gedling Borough Council Civic Centre Date: Arnot Hill Park Arnold Nottingham NG5 6LU Dear Sir Gedling Borough Local Plan Review 1. As you know, I was appointed by the First Secretary of State to hold a public inquiry into objections to the Draft Gedling Borough Local Plan Review. The Local Plan Inquiry began on 18 March 2003 and closed on 26 August 2003. The inquiry sat for 72 half-day sessions, although in some of these sessions, objections from more than one objector were heard. A pre-inquiry meeting was held on 13 December 2002. Before, during and after the Inquiry I made accompanied or unaccompanied site visits to all the sites that were the subject of objections. 2. The District Local Plan Review covers the whole of the Borough of Gedling. When adopted it will replace the Local Plan adopted in 1990. The review plan covers the period until 2011. 3. The Council supplied me with a database listing all the representations made on the Draft Local Plan, updated to the close of the Local Plan Inquiry. They also supplied me with a skeleton report that contained headings and listed all the objections with summaries. My report uses the structure of the skeleton report, which broadly reflects the structure of the Local Plan itself. 4. The Programme Officer, in conjunction with the Council’s Planning Officers, have prepared Appendices to my report listing the objectors, those who appeared at the Local Plan Inquiry and the Core Documents used during the Inquiry. It is my understanding that these appendices have been supplied directly to the Council. A complete set of the documents submitted in connection with the Inquiry is held in the Local Plans Section at Gedling Borough Council, Civic Centre, Arnot Hill Park, Arnold NG5 6LU and may be inspected or referred to there. 5. A copy of this letter has been sent for information to: • the Government Office for the East Midlands; • the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister in London. The Representations 6. As you know, the Nottinghamshire County Planning Authority did not issue a Statement of Conformity confirming that the Local Plan is in general conformity with the adopted County Structure Plan. However, I was able to consider the matters that are of concern to the County Council as objections to the Local Plan. 7. The Local Plan was placed on deposit twice, in 2000 and 2002, following the publication of an earlier consultation draft plan. As a result numerous representations were received from organisations and individuals. According to the Council’s database there were 8640 objections to the Draft Local Plan, of which 1034 had been withdrawn by the end of the Inquiry. There were also 4211 representations supporting the Draft Local Plan, of which 125 had been withdrawn by the end of the Inquiry. These figures include some representations that the Council had originally classified as “comments” but which, on my insistence, were reclassified either as objections or as support. The Phased Release of the Local Plan Inquiry Report 8. The government attaches great importance to speeding up the planning system in general and the plan-making process in particular. I am also aware there are important and difficult planning decisions to be taken in Gedling and that some of the developments that are needed require a long lead-in time. There is a pressing need to move forward. 9. For these reasons I have approached and organised my work by splitting it into two parts: • all the policies (and objections) in the Local Plan with a direct bearing on how much development is needed and where it should take place; • the other policies, which may be regarded as less pressing. 10. I am releasing the report to the Council in two parts, so the first part does not have to wait for the completion of the second part. I anticipate that the first part of my work will be the most contentious, although to some extent this is a guess because I have not begun work on the second part yet. However, I hope that delivering the report in two parts will give the Council more time to consider the most contentious matters, speed the process overall and bring forward the time when implementation can start. 11. The first part of my report contains the complete chapters on Housing, Employment, Transport and Community Services and selected policies in the Environment chapter. All being well, the rest will follow about two months after this. Matters Taken into Account 12. In considering the objections, I have had regard to the submissions made by or on behalf of the various objectors and for the Council, and to all other material considerations, including current Planning Policy Guidance and Circulars where appropriate. I have also had regard to the representations made in support of the plan. 13. The Council will need to take into account any PPG, Circular or other government advice published after the delivery of my report. Unless otherwise stated, my references to government policy as set out in Circulars or PPGs relate to the versions that were current at the close of the Inquiry. The Council will 2 need to have regard to any subsequent revisions to government guidance or policy that occur prior to the adoption of the Plan. 14. I have not been able to have regard to any changes in local planning circumstances that may have occurred since I closed the Inquiry. The Council will also need to take any such changes into account when they consider my report. General Approach 15. I have no illusions that my report will be popular, either with the Council or with the majority of objectors, although I believe that a better Local Plan will result. Because of the report’s length and the numerous matters of detail it covers, I will highlight the key components of my thinking here. 16. I consider that broadly speaking the Council set itself the correct parameters for preparing the Local Plan because these were derived from the adopted Structure Plan. In general terms I endorse the Council’s starting points regarding the number of new dwellings to be accommodated, residential density, the amount of employment land to be found and the general principles guiding locational choices. 17. However, there are five major issues on which I part company with the Council: • the extent to which the delivery of dwellings at Gedling Colliery / Chase Farm can be relied on by the end of the plan (2011); • whether it is (yet) safe to allocate land for major areas of development in the Trent valley; • how urgent it is to identify an adequate and varied supply of developable land to enable an immediate and sustained increase in the rate at which new housing is being delivered in Gedling; • whether (more) land (than is needed for development) should be taken out of the Green Belt and designated as White or Safeguarded Land; • whether it is wise or helpful for the Local Plan to deal with developer contributions in the way it does. 18. Nearly all of the major modifications to the Local Plan I am recommending can be traced back to these main issues. Land for New Dwellings 19. As I have said, I have largely accepted the case advanced by the Council concerning how much land will be needed for residential development to satisfy the requirements of the Structure Plan. What flows from this is the recognition that a considerable amount of greenfield land will need to be developed and that this will involve taking land out of the Green Belt. 20. I recognise that many members of the public (and groups) do not accept this but the evidence is clear that enough development land cannot be found unless considerable areas are removed from the Green Belt. I am satisfied this is both necessary and sanctioned by the Structure Plan. Some objectors believe that the latest government guidance (as in PPG3), in effect, prohibits development on greenfield sites but this is not so. Rather, it establishes that greenfield land should not be used if enough brownfield land is available. It is also sometimes overlooked that government guidance places a strong emphasis on the need to ensure there is enough housing land available to enable housing needs in the area to be met. 3 21. However, against this background it is also important that too much greenfield land is not made available for development because this could inhibit the use of previously developed land in the wider urban area in the short or longer term. This is why I have resisted pressure from house builders that even more land should be released. Employment Land 22. Things are less clear cut in relation to land for employment. Again, I have accepted the Structure Plan as the starting point and am satisfied that some greenfield and Green Belt land has to be released for development. However, the evidence (from CPRE and others) that past demand for employment land has been far slower than the Structure Plan anticipated is persuasive enough for me to conclude that it is not of overriding importance that the Structure Plan guideline is met in its entirety.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greater Nottingham Retail Study For
    Appendix 1 Greater Nottingham Retail Study For Nottingham City Council Nottinghamshire County Council Broxtowe Borough Council Gedling Borough Council Rushcliffe Borough Council Prepared by DTZ 48 Warwick Street London W1B 5NL Tel: 020-7534-5064 Job No. 133957 January 2008 1. Summary of Principal Findings and Conclusions 1 This Retail Study was commissioned by the five Local Authorities to advise on the need for new retail development in the sub-region, and how it could be accommodated in a commercially realistic way. It was also intended to identify the hierarchy of centres in the Districts; and provide information on the vitality and viability of each town centre, applying the criteria in PPS6. The Study will form part of the evidence base for each new Local Development Framework. National trends in retailing and retail development 2 As the context for retail planning and development, a review of national trends in retailing and retail development was undertaken. The principal implications of these trends for Greater Nottingham are as follows: (a) To achieve new retail development in the smaller centres, it will be necessary to encourage non-traditional forms of development. These will either need to be mixed use schemes, probably including substantial residential elements so as to increase value and subsidise the ground floor retail accommodation, or be low cost developments such as simple free-standing stores. (b) Despite PPS6 and the sequential approach, there will be continued pressure for more out-of-centre development of retail warehouses; and pressure to relax bulky goods conditions on existing retail warehouses in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Orthodontic Treatment Needs of the Resident
    An assessment of the orthodontic treatment needs of the resident population of Derbyshire, Derby, Nottinghamshire and Nottingham compared with the level of current service provision - 2018 1 Executive Summary NHS orthodontic care is the treatment of malocclusions and is provided in both primary and secondary care, but the majority is provided in primary care for those cases of index of orthodontic treatment need of 3.6 and above. Across Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, a total of 40 contracts were commissioned to provide orthodontics within primary care (2016-17). Practitioners were contracted to provide either mixed GDS and orthodontic care (27 contracts) or purely orthodontic care (13 contracts). All commissioned activity is recurrent. March 2019 sees the expiry of the majority of PDS Orthodontic contracts across Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire (12 contracts). The remaining general and orthodontic contracts are not available for procurement as they have no end date. Estimates have been made of the numbers of cases delivered by the hospital services, however it is unknown whether there may be the potential for some cases to be delivered in a primary care specialist setting. The recently implemented referral management system will support delivery of care in the most appropriate environment for the needs of the individual patient. There are various methods of determining orthodontic treatment need in a population which have been explored for the population of Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire and produce broadly comparable estimates. The estimated number of case starts per year within Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire requiring access to orthodontic treatment when only demand (and not caries) is considered, based on the locally available epidemiological evidence and taking into account predicted population growth between 2008 and 2029 lies within the range 7144 and 8458.
    [Show full text]
  • Calverton, Lambley and Woodborough Area (Revised)) (Weight Restriction) Traffic Regulation Order 2020 (7222)
    THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 The Nottinghamshire County Council (Calverton, Lambley and Woodborough Area (Revised)) (Weight Restriction) Traffic Regulation Order 2020 (7222) The NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ("the Council") in exercise of its powers under Sections 1(1) and (2), 2(4) and 3(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("the Act") and of all other enabling powers and with the consent of the Secretary of State under Part II of Schedule 9 and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of that Schedule to the Act hereby makes the following Order:- 1. Save as provided in Article 2 of this Order, no heavy commercial vehicle shall, except upon the direction or with the permission of a Police Constable in uniform, to proceed in any of the roads specified in Schedule 1 to this Order. 2. Nothing in Article 1 of this Order shall make it unlawful for a heavy commercial vehicle to proceed in the roads specified in Schedule 1 to this Order if the vehicle is being used:- (1) for or in connection with the conveyance of goods to or from premises situated on or adjacent to that length of road; (2) for the purpose of agriculture on any land adjacent to that length of road or for or in connection with the conveyance or haulage of timber felled upon such land; (3) in connection with the carrying out on, or on the premises situated on or adjacent to, that length of road of any of the following operations, namely– (i) building, industrial or demolition operations; (ii)
    [Show full text]
  • CTK NEWS Also Available Online At
    CTK NEWS Also available online at www.christtheking.notts.sch.uk May 2015 Dear parents receive a letter detailing those changes very soon. In addition, This is as always an incredibly there have been some slight short half-term, however many adjustments to the School of our students have started uniform, in particular, their public examinations and regarding girls’ skirts. In due are working incredibly hard! I course, you will receive a letter know that this can be a very which outlines the details of stressful time for parents and these changes and if you have carers too and I would like to any queries, please do not thank you for the support that hesitate to contact school. you have given to your child Finally, may I wish you all a during these last few weeks very restful half term break and months. with your family and friends Dates for the Diary Half Term 23rd May—31 I would like to make you and I look forward to May aware of two major changes welcoming our students back Y10 History Trip Galleries of that will take place in in June. Justice Y12/13 A Level PE September. The timings for Moderation Day the school day will change in Best wishes English Schools Athletics Championships at Harvey September and you will Carlo Cuomo Hadden Inside this issue: CTK Cats 1 Art & Design 2 CTK Cats Athletics 3 The CTK Cats went to a competition last weekend in Leicester. The girls gained 2nd, 3rd and 4th place trophies! DoE 4 Year 7 ‘youth level 1’ team.
    [Show full text]
  • EMC POLICY BRIEF a Weekly Round up of Local Government News in the East Midlands Brought to You by East Midlands Councils
    EMC POLICY BRIEF A weekly round up of local government news in the East Midlands brought to you by East Midlands Councils Top items this week 4 MARCH 2016 Boston Awarded Member North Midlands Midlands Engine Update EMC Events for Councillors Development Charter - Again Devolution Update and Officers North Midlands Devolution Update Councils in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire held talks this morning on the proposed North Midlands Devolution Deal. Across the two city and county areas, 13 councils have signed up to the devolution proposals and remain determined to secure a transfer of powers from further negotiations with central government in order to ensure their residents do not lose out on the opportunities offered. Alongside Nottingham City and Nottinghamshire County Council; Gedling Borough Council, Broxtowe Borough Council, Mansfield District Council, Rushcliffe Borough Council, Ashfield District Council, Newark and Sherwood District Council all agreed to be part of the deal. In addition, Derbyshire County Council, Derby City Council, Bolsover District Council, Derbyshire Dales District Council and North East Derbyshire District Council have all signed-up. South Derbyshire District Council, High Peak Borough Council, Amber Valley Borough Council and Erewash Borough Council all opted out. Chesterfield Borough and Bassetlaw District Councils have stated their preference to join the Sheffield City region proposals. Boston Awarded Member Development Charter - Again Congratulations to Boston Borough Council on achieving re-accreditation of the East Midlands Regional Councillor Development Charter. EMC would like to commend the commitment, dedication and continuing development in the area of councillor development that was observed during the recent formal assessment process. Details about the Councillor Development Charter can be found here.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 71 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton, GCB.KBE. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin.QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albemarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholjn. Sir Andrew Wheatley,CBE. Mr F B Young, CBE. To the Rt Hon Roy Jenkins, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED EI£CTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FUR THE BOROUGH OF GEDLING IN THE COUNT*/ OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the borough of Gedling in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of and Schedule 9 to the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough* 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60 (l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 18 January 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Gedling Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to the Nottinghamshire County Council, Parish Councils in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties* Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the Local Government press and to the local radio broadcasting station* Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cd/Ex/67 Gedling Borough Aligned Core Strategy
    Gedling Borough Publication Version Proposals Map (including Main Modifications) CD/EX/67 GEDLING BOROUGH ALIGNED CORE STRATEGY Publication Version Proposals Map including those changes arising from the Main Modifications March 2014 Part of the Gedling Borough Local Plan 1 Gedling Borough Publication Version Proposals Map (including Main Modifications) Contents Page Introduction 3 Strategic Allocations 4 Top Wighay Farm 4 Teal Close 4 Land North of Papplewick Lane Strategic Location 5 Gedling Colliery/Chase Farm 5 Plans Top Wighay Farm area covered by Inset 6 Top Wighay Farm Inset plan 7 North of Papplewick Lane area covered by Inset 8 North of Papplewick Lane Inset plan 9 Teal Close area covered by Inset 10 Teal Close Inset Plan 11 2 Gedling Borough Publication Version Proposals Map (including Main Modifications) Introduction Gedling Borough Council is in the process of producing a new ‘Local Plan1’. The Aligned Core Strategy is part of this Local Plan and provides the strategic vision for development across the Borough of Gedling and the three partner local authority areas until 2028. The Aligned Core Strategy was submitted for independent examination in June 2013 and hearings have been held in October - November 2013 and resumed in February 2014. As a result of the hearings and consultee representations the three Councils have proposed main modifications to the Publication Draft Aligned Core Strategy. Local planning authorities must maintain an adopted proposals map (also known as an adopted policies map) which shows geographically the application of policies, proposals and designations in the adopted development plan. The present adopted proposals map for Gedling Borough is the Gedling Borough Replacement Local Plan Proposals Map adopted on 12th July 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Who Guides May Contain Acronyms That Are Unfamiliar to Some
    Who’s Who in the East Midlands A directory of key health and social care contacts in the East Midlands Updated January 2016_V4 1 Each of the regional networks that make up Regional Voices, including One East Midlands, has produced a “Who’s Who” guide to key people working in health, wellbeing and care in each region. The guides include relevant people from NHS England area teams, clinical commissioning groups, health and wellbeing boards, CQC, commissioning support units and local Healthwatch. You can access the Who’s Who guides for the other regions at www.regionalvoices.org/whoswho !!! Acronoym warning !!! The Who's Who Guides may contain acronyms that are unfamiliar to some. All relevant new structures and names are explained in our Regional Voices briefings. So if you'd like to know your CCGs from your CQC- please read the Regional Voices briefings which explain all Please help us keep this guide up to date by notifying us of any changes, corrections or information to help us fill any gaps by emailing [email protected] 2 NHS England Regional Teams NHS England Midlands and East is one of four regional teams that support the commissioning services and directly commission primary care and specialised services at a local level across England. Geographically, the Midlands and East regional team covers the West Midlands, North Midlands, Central Midlands and East. https://www.england.nhs.uk/mids-east/contact-us/ North and Central Midlands Regional teams - NHS England Directors of Commissioning Operation NHS England Director of Commissioning
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Heritage of Gedling Borough
    Gedling Borough Brought Alive The history and heritage of Gedling Borough Featuring a host of fascinating historic locations and places of outstanding natural beauty for you to visit. Introduction The purpose of this leaflet is to enable you to find your way around the most important and interesting sites of local and natural history within the borough of Gedling. Each location is open to the public to varying degrees. Some may only be seen from the outside, while others are open to full public viewing, such as Newstead Abbey and Papplewick Pumping Station. Where needed, contact details or websites, for further details, are given in each instance. Gedling Borough is an amalgamation of 17 villages and small towns, which form an area stretching from the suburbs of Nottingham to tranquil rural settings which have retained their country charm. The heritage of the borough includes people and places that changed the world, including Newstead Abbey, home of the poet Lord Byron, Papplewick Pumping Station, a nationally renowned Victorian attraction; the birthplace in Calverton of William Lee, the “father” of mechanised knitting and lace making; The birthplace of Lord Ralph Cromwell (1393-1456; Treasurer of England, who built Tattersall Castle) and of Thomas Hawksley, who designed and built Britain’s first domestic water supply system which was under constant pressure, preventing the deaths of millions of people around the world. Some of the earliest Luddite and Chartist skirmishes took place within the borough and the legend of St. Swithun originated in Woodborough! Coal mining became prominent in the borough and consequently left significant changes to the landscape, which was once part of the Ancient Sherwood Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planning Policy Team Bolsover District Council the Arc High Street Clowne S43 4JY SENT by E-MAIL and POST 12Th December 2016
    The Planning Policy Team Bolsover District Council The Arc High Street Clowne S43 4JY SENT BY E-MAIL AND POST 12th December 2016 Dear Sir / Madam BOLSOVER DRAFT LOCAL PLAN CONSULTATION Introduction Thank you for consulting with the Home Builders Federation (HBF) on the above mentioned consultation. The HBF is the principal representative body of the house-building industry in England and Wales. Our representations reflect the views of our membership, which includes multi-national PLC’s, regional developers and small, local builders. In any one year, our members account for over 80% of all new “for sale” market housing built in England and Wales as well as a large proportion of newly built affordable housing. We would like to submit the following representations and appear at future Examination Hearing Sessions to discuss these matters in greater detail. Duty to Co-operate Under S110 of the Localism Act 2011 which introduced S33A into the 2004 Act the Council must co-operate with other prescribed bodies to maximise the effectiveness of plan making. The Duty to Co-operate requires the Council to “engage constructively, actively and on an on-going basis”. The high level principles associated with the Duty are set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (paras 156, 178 – 181) and twenty three paragraphs of the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) provide more detail about the Duty. In considering if the Duty has been satisfied it is important to consider the outcomes arising from the process and the influence of these outcomes on the Plan. A fundamental outcome is the delivery of full objectively assessed housing needs (OAHN) for market and affordable housing in a Housing Market Area (HMA) as set out by the NPPF (para 47) including the unmet needs of neighbouring authorities where it is reasonable to do so and consistent with sustainable development (para 182).
    [Show full text]
  • NHS England North Midlands Nottinghamshire LHRP HEALTH
    NHS England North Midlands Nottinghamshire LHRP HEALTH PROTECTION RESPONSE MOU Version 2.1 August 2018 NHS England North Midlands Nottinghamshire Local Health Resilience Partnership Health Protection Response Memorandum of Understanding Date August 2018 Audience NHS England - North Midlands NHS England Midlands & East (Regional) NHS Providers - North Midlands West & East Midlands Ambulance Service Clinical Commissioning Groups - North Midlands Public Health England - West & East Midlands Local Authority Public Health Teams - North Midlands Copy to Members of Staffordshire/Derbyshire/Nottinghamshire and Shropshire Local Health Resilience Partnership (LHRP) NHS England Heads of EPRR Midlands & East (Region) LRF Secretariats, Staffordshire, Shropshire, Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire Description This is an operational response plan, please read in the context of: Civil Contingencies Act 2004 Health & Social Care Act 2012 NHS Act 2006 Public Health (Control of Diseases) Act 1984 as updated by the Health & Social Care Act 2008 and 2012 NHS England EPRR Framework 2015 PHE Concept of Operations Agreeing local roles for responding to Health Protection Incidents (PHE Gateway Number: 2013-357) PHE Local health protection audit - Results from local health protection audit December 2017 NHS Standard Contract 2018/19 East Midlands Communicable Outbreak Management Plan and Derbyshire Action card (Addendum 1) NHS England 2015 - Who Pays? Determining responsibility for payments to providers Cross reference http://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/gov/eprr/ and links Action This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been developed as a high required level document to ensure that there is a process in place for responding to health protection incidents. It is important that all relevant staff understand this MOU and is aware of their role and responsibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • North Midlands Controlled Drugs Newsletter
    March 2016 North Midlands Controlled Drugs Newsletter This edition of the Controlled Drugs Newsletter contains local and national NHS England North CD information. You can use the dedicated email inboxes to contact us. For Midlands Shropshire & Staffordshire email [email protected] and Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire email [email protected] Controlled Drugs Accountable Officer Online Controlled Drugs Reporting Tool Samantha Travis [email protected] In December 2015 NHS England North Midlands went live with a new online reporting tool. All primary care contractors are encouraged to Selina Utting register to use the tool as it not just for reporting incidents that may have Assistant to CDAO happened within your organisation. Tel: 0113 8255479 [email protected] The tool also provides you with a secure way to raise any concerns you may have regarding a patients usage of controlled drugs, prescribing Eleanor Carnegie concerns or dispensing errors, fraud, theft etc. We would strongly Controlled Drugs encourage all primary care contractors to report any concerns they have Support Officer which involve controlled drugs from Schedules 1 -5 as this information may (Shropshire & support a wider issue that you are unaware of. Staffordshire) Tel: 0113 8254630 The CD reporting tool can be accessed at www.cdreporting.co.uk . When [email protected] registering please select the NORTH MIDLANDS region. If you have any difficulties registering or using the system please contact a member of your NHS England North Midlands Controlled Drugs Team. Margaret Farrow-Johnson Controlled Drugs Support Officer (Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire) Margaret.farrow- [email protected] Occurrence Reports Just a reminder if not already done so, that Q4 (January 2016—March 2016) occurrence reports are due on the 29th April.
    [Show full text]