DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 71 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton, GCB.KBE. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin.QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albemarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholjn. Sir Andrew Wheatley,CBE. Mr F B Young, CBE. To the Rt Hon Roy Jenkins, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED EI£CTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FUR THE BOROUGH OF GEDLING IN THE COUNT*/ OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the borough of Gedling in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of and Schedule 9 to the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that borough* 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60 (l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 18 January 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Gedling Borough Council, copies of which were circulated to the Nottinghamshire County Council, Parish Councils in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties* Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the Local Government press and to the local radio broadcasting station* Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies. 3. Gedling Borough Council were invited to prepare a scheme of representation for our consideration* In doing so, they were asked to observe the rules laid down in Schedule 11 to the Local Government Act 1972 and the guidelines which we set out in our Report No 6 about the proposed si»e of the council and the proposed number of councillors for each ward. They were asked also to take into account any views expressed to them following their consultation with local interests. We therefore asked that they should publish details of their provisional proposals about a month before they submitted their draft scheme to us, thus allowing an opportunity for local comment. 4. The Council have not passed a resolution under section 7(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 and a system of whole council elections will therefore apply. 5. On 20 June 1974 the Gedling Borough Council presented their draft scheme of representation. They proposed to divide the area of the borough into twenty-four wards each returning 1, 2 or 3 members to form a council of 56, one more than the existing council. 6. We considered the draft scheme together with the comments we had received. We considered that the Borough Council's scheme provided a sound basis for our draft proposals, but that two of their proposed wards were over-represented. We decided to combine these 2 wards reducing their combined representation by 1 councillor and reducing the total number of councillors to 55. After consultation with Ordnance Survey we made a number of minor adjustments to ward boundaries in order to secure boundary lines which would be more readily identifiable on the ground. We then formulated our draft proposals accordingly. 7« On 31 July 1974 we issued our draft proposals and these were sent to all who had received our consultation letter or had commented on the Council's draft scheme. The Council were asked to make these draft proposals, and the accompanying map which defined the proposed ward boundaries, available for inspection at their main offices. Representations on our draft proposals were invited from thoae to whom they were circulated and, by public notices, from other members of the public and interested bodies. We asked that any comments should reach us by 9 October 1974. 8. The District Council accepted our draft proposals. An alternative scheme for a council of 48 members was put forward by a local political party, and comments supporting this scheme were received. Other comments proposed some redistribution of electorate effecting six of the proposed wards, on grounds of improved compatibility with future county electoral arrangements. There was also opposition to these suggested changes. A local residents' association sought separate representation for their area and there were several requests that the name of one ward should be changed. 9. In view of these reactions to our draft proposals we considered that we needed further information to enable us to reach a conclusion. Therefore, in accordance with section 65(2) of the 1972 Act and, at our request, you appointed Mr V D Knox as an Assistant Commissioner to hold a local meeting and report to us. 10. The Assistant Commissioner held a meeting on 8 May and carried out an inspection of those areas which had been the subject of differing views. A copy of his report to us is attached at Schedule 1 to this report. 11. The Assistant Commissioner, having heard all the local views and having visited the areas concerned, came to the conclusion that our draft proposals should be modified in only one respect, that the name of the Mapperley ward should be changed.to "St James". 12. We have considered again our draft proposals in the light of the comments which we had received and of the Assistant Commisioner's Report. We accept the conclusions reached by the Assistant Commissioner and the modification which he recommended and, subject to this, we hereby confirm our draft proposals as our final proposals* 13. Details of these final proposals are set out in Schedule 2 to this report and on the attached maps* Schedule 2 gives the names of the wards and the number of councillors to be returned by each. The boundaries of the new wards are defined on the maps. PUBLICATION 14* In accordance with section 60(5)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972, a copy of this report and a copy of the maps are being sent to Gedling Borough Council and will be available for public inspection at the Council's main offices. Copies of this report are also being sent to those who received the consultation letter and to those who made comments. A detailed description of the boundaries of the proposed wards, as defined on the maps, is set out in Schedule 3 to this report. L.S. SIGNED EDMUND COKFTON (CHAIRMAN) JOHN M RANKIN (DEPUTY CHAIKMAN) DIANA ALBEMAKLE T C BENFIELD MICHAEL CHISHOIW ANDREW WHEATLEY F B YOUNG DAVID R SMITH (Secretary) \<j June 1975 V. DOUGLAS KNOX, D.F.C., Solicitor. Assistant Commissioner, Local Government Boundary Commission for England. TO: THE SECRETARY, LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY 'COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND. REVIEW OF THE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FUR THE BOROUGH OF GEDLING. Pursuant to my appointment by the Secretary of State as Assistant Commissioner to hold a local enquiry or carry out any consultation or investigation with respect to the review by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England of the electoral arrangements for the Borough of Gedling, I conducted a local meeting at the Council House, Carlton, Nottingham on Thursday, the 8th May, 1975. Attendance, The following persons attended the meeting:- NAME. REPRESENTING or STATUS Herbert Bird Gedling Borough Council P.O. Pepper Gedling Borough Council Michael Sermon Arnold Branches of the Carlton Conservative Association Ron Griffin Gedling Borough Council Peter Wright Notts County Council Conservative Group G.F. Swain Gedling Borough Council H. Pac ey Porchester Conservative Branch Miss M. Wilford Hon. Sec. Porchester Conservative Association Mrs. Edith Butler Porchester Conservative Association David Langridge Nether-field and Colwick Branch of the Carlton Conservative Association (Chairman) Miss A.L. Brookes. Secretary and Agent, Carlton Conservative Association H.F. Calladlne Gedling Borough Council L. Allsop Colwick Residents Association (Chairman) J. Bennett. 11 fl " (Sec.) G.B. firth. Deputy Director of Administration Nottinghamshire County Council A.J. Goulden Senior Administrative Officer, Nottinghamshire County Council M.S. Hall Carlton Constituency Labour. Party T.H. Saunderson Carlton Constituency Labour Party - 2 - HAMS REPRESENTING OR STATUS D.A. Knight Gedling Borough Labour Sroup Florence Price • East Midlands Regions! Labour Party A. Purvis Carlton Constituency Labour Party Fay RLeley Carlton Constituency Labour Party and Arnold Tenants Association G. Corner tt it 11 11 tt W.N. Robson Carlton Constituency Labour Party Dorothy s. Shillito Unification of Ravenshead Steering Committee L.W. Pallard Gedling Borough Conservative Group A.R. Ellis Carlton Conservative Association M. Noble. Gedling Borough Council In addition to those attending, a letter was received from the Clerk to the Parish Council of Linby and this was read to the meeting. Preliminaries In opening the meeting I submitted my personal appointment as Assistant Commissioner and emphasised that to facilitate the expression and discussion of views on the Commission's Draft Proposals, the modifications suggested by the Nottinghamshire County Council, the representations relating to the proposed Netherfield and Mapperley Wards and the alternative scheme for the borough submitted by the Carlton Constituency Labour Party, I intended to proceed as informally as possible, I then set out a proposed order of business and this was accepted by those present. Commission's Draft Proposals The Commission's Draft Proposals adopted in the main the Gedling Borough Council's draft scheme. Some slight amendments were however made by the Commission. These consisted of the combination, of the parishes of Linby, Papplewick and Newstead to form one ward represented by two councillors, instead of two wards returning three councillors between them, the total Council thus being reduced from 56 to 55- A small number of boundary realignments were made in the interests of securing better boundaries.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nottinghamshire's Sustainable Community Strategy
    Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy the nottinghamshire partnership all together better 2010-2020 Contents 1 Foreword 5 2 Introduction 7 3 Nottinghamshire - our vision for 2020 9 4 How we put this strategy together What is this document based on? 11 How this document links with other important documents 11 Our evidence base 12 5 Nottinghamshire - the timeline 13 6 Nottinghamshire today 15 7 Key background issues 17 8 Nottinghamshire’s economy - recession and recovery 19 9 Key strategic challenges 21 10 Our priorities for the future A greener Nottinghamshire 23 A place where Nottinghamshire’s children achieve their full potential 27 A safer Nottinghamshire 33 Health and well-being for all 37 A more prosperous Nottinghamshire 43 Making Nottinghamshire’s communities stronger 47 11 Borough/District community strategies 51 12 Next steps and contacts 57 Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 l p.3 Appendices I The Nottinghamshire Partnership 59 II Underpinning principles 61 III Our evidence base 63 IV Consultation 65 V Nottinghamshire - the timeline 67 VI Borough/District chapters Ashfield 69 Bassetlaw 74 Broxtowe 79 Gedling 83 Mansfield 87 Newark and Sherwood 92 Rushcliffe 94 VII Case studies 99 VIII Other relevant strategies and action plans 105 IX Performance management - how will we know that we have achieved our targets? 107 X List of acronyms 109 XI Glossary of terms 111 XII Equality impact assessment 117 p.4 l Nottinghamshire’s Sustainable Community Strategy 2010-2020 1 l Foreword This document, the second community strategy for Nottinghamshire, outlines the key priorities for the county over the next ten years.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Nottingham Retail Study For
    Appendix 1 Greater Nottingham Retail Study For Nottingham City Council Nottinghamshire County Council Broxtowe Borough Council Gedling Borough Council Rushcliffe Borough Council Prepared by DTZ 48 Warwick Street London W1B 5NL Tel: 020-7534-5064 Job No. 133957 January 2008 1. Summary of Principal Findings and Conclusions 1 This Retail Study was commissioned by the five Local Authorities to advise on the need for new retail development in the sub-region, and how it could be accommodated in a commercially realistic way. It was also intended to identify the hierarchy of centres in the Districts; and provide information on the vitality and viability of each town centre, applying the criteria in PPS6. The Study will form part of the evidence base for each new Local Development Framework. National trends in retailing and retail development 2 As the context for retail planning and development, a review of national trends in retailing and retail development was undertaken. The principal implications of these trends for Greater Nottingham are as follows: (a) To achieve new retail development in the smaller centres, it will be necessary to encourage non-traditional forms of development. These will either need to be mixed use schemes, probably including substantial residential elements so as to increase value and subsidise the ground floor retail accommodation, or be low cost developments such as simple free-standing stores. (b) Despite PPS6 and the sequential approach, there will be continued pressure for more out-of-centre development of retail warehouses; and pressure to relax bulky goods conditions on existing retail warehouses in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowdham – Flood Risk Information and Faqs
    Lowdham – Flood Risk Information and FAQs 1. Which organisation is responsible for my stretch of river? Environment Agency The Environment Agency (EA) carries out maintenance, improvement or construction work on main rivers to manage flood risk. It is also responsible for working in partnership with the Met Office to provide flood forecasts and warnings. The main river map (link below) shows which rivers are designated as ‘main rivers’. In Lowdham, downstream reaches of the Cocker Beck, to the east of the Epperstone Bypass, is main river. Other rivers are called ‘ordinary watercourses’. Lead local flood authorities, district councils and internal drainage boards carry out flood risk management on ordinary watercourses. To see a map of the Main River network, please visit: https://environment.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=17cd53dfc52 4433980cc333726a56386 Local Lead Flood Authority (LLFA) LLFAs are county councils and unitary authorities. They are responsible for managing the risk of flooding from surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses (smaller watercourses) and lead on community recovery. For information for your local council, please see: www.newark-sherwooddc.gov.uk Newark and Sherwood District Council 01636 650000 Internal Drainage Board Each Internal Drainage Board (IDB) is a public body that manages water levels in an area, known as an internal drainage district, where there is a special need for drainage. IDBs undertake works to reduce flood risk to people and property, and manage water levels for agricultural and environmental needs within their district. However, not all areas are covered by an IDB. There are 112 IDBs in England. They play a key role in reducing flood risk to over 600,000 people and nearly 900,000 properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Calverton, Lambley and Woodborough Area (Revised)) (Weight Restriction) Traffic Regulation Order 2020 (7222)
    THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ROAD TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT 1984 The Nottinghamshire County Council (Calverton, Lambley and Woodborough Area (Revised)) (Weight Restriction) Traffic Regulation Order 2020 (7222) The NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL ("the Council") in exercise of its powers under Sections 1(1) and (2), 2(4) and 3(2) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 ("the Act") and of all other enabling powers and with the consent of the Secretary of State under Part II of Schedule 9 and after consultation with the Chief Officer of Police in accordance with Part III of that Schedule to the Act hereby makes the following Order:- 1. Save as provided in Article 2 of this Order, no heavy commercial vehicle shall, except upon the direction or with the permission of a Police Constable in uniform, to proceed in any of the roads specified in Schedule 1 to this Order. 2. Nothing in Article 1 of this Order shall make it unlawful for a heavy commercial vehicle to proceed in the roads specified in Schedule 1 to this Order if the vehicle is being used:- (1) for or in connection with the conveyance of goods to or from premises situated on or adjacent to that length of road; (2) for the purpose of agriculture on any land adjacent to that length of road or for or in connection with the conveyance or haulage of timber felled upon such land; (3) in connection with the carrying out on, or on the premises situated on or adjacent to, that length of road of any of the following operations, namely– (i) building, industrial or demolition operations; (ii)
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Sub-Agents' Names and Offices for the Police and Crime Commissioner Elections
    NOTICE OF ELECTION SUB-AGENTS' NAMES AND OFFICES Election of a Police and Crime Commissioner for Nottinghamshire Police Area on Thursday 15 November 2012 I HEREBY GIVE NOTICE that the names and addresses of election sub-agents of the candidates at this election for the said Voting Areas, and the addresses of the offices or places of such election sub-agents to which all claims, notices, writs, summons, and other documents addressed to them may be sent, have respectively been declared in writing to me as follows: Name of Name of Address of Election Offices of Election Sub- Candidate & Election Sub- Sub-Agent Agent Voting Area Agent ROBERTS, Tony SAXELBY 35 Farnsworth Grove 35 Farnsworth Grove Paul Huthwaite Huthwaite Sutton In Ashfield Sutton In Ashfield Ashfield Voting NG17 2AR NG17 2AR Area ROBERTS, Tony SIMPSON Mill Farm Mill Farm Annette Gringley Road Gringley Road Beckingham Beckingham Bassetlaw Voting Doncaster Doncaster Area DN10 4QD DN10 4QD ROBERTS, Tony WILLOUGHBY 19 Ardmore Close Beeston Conservative Thomas Sneinton Club Notingham 146 Station Road Broxtowe Voting NG2 4GP Beeston Area Nottingham NG9 2AY ROBERTS, Tony SHEPHERD MBE 15 Penarth Gardens 222 Carlton Hill Melvyn Nottingham Carlton NG5 4EG Nottingham Gedling Voting NG4 1FY Area ROBERTS, Tony STEWARDSON 65 Carter Lane 65 Carter Lane Stephanie Mansfield Mansfield Nottinghamshire Nottinghamshire Mansfield Voting NG18 3DQ NG18 3DQ Area Dated Tuesday 6 November 2012 Allen Graham Police Area Returning Officer Printed and published by the Police Area Returning Officer, Civic
    [Show full text]
  • The Nottinghamshire County Council (Magenta Way, Stoke Bardolph)(Prohibition of Waiting and No Stopping on Entrance Clearway) Traffic Regulation Order 2021 (7243)
    The Nottinghamshire County Council (Magenta Way, Stoke Bardolph)(Prohibition of Waiting and No Stopping on Entrance Clearway) Traffic Regulation Order 2021 (7243) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Nottinghamshire County Council proposes to make an Order under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, as amended, Traffic Management Act 2004, as amended, and The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (County of Nottinghamshire) Designation Order 2008 (SI 2008 No. 1086), as amended, the effects of which will be to roads in Stoke Bardolph in the Borough of Gedling:- 1. Proposed No waiting at any time restrictions (double yellow lines):- (i) MAGENTA WAY (the north-east side) from a point 14 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) (as measure along the centre line) in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 158 metres. (ii) MAGENTA WAY (the south-west side) from a point 14 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) (as measure along the centre line) in a south-easterly direction for a distance of 66 metres. (iii) from a point 130 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) in a south- easterly and then an easterly direction for a distance of 46 metres. 2. Proposed No Stopping on Entrance Clearway on Mon – Fri between 8am and 4.30pm:- (i) MAGENTA WAY (the south-west side) from a point 104 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) in a south- easterly direction for a distance of 26 metres. 3. Other Restrictions – Bus stop Clearway – No Stopping, except buses, at all times (i) MAGENTA WAY (the south-west side) from a point 80 metres south-east of its junction with Trent Valley Road (A612) in a south- easterly direction for a distance of 25 metres Relevant documents may be inspected at the locations below or by visiting the County Councils website – consult.nottinghamshire.gov.uk (a) The Nottinghamshire County Council, County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham NG2 7QP.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire
    Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Newark & Sherwood in Nottinghamshire Further electoral review December 2005 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 15 2 Current electoral arrangements 19 3 Submissions received 23 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 25 Electorate figures 26 Council size 26 Electoral equality 27 General analysis 28 Warding arrangements 28 a Clipstone, Edwinstowe and Ollerton wards 29 b Bilsthorpe, Blidworth, Farnsfield and Rainworth wards 30 c Boughton, Caunton and Sutton-on-Trent wards 32 d Collingham & Meering, Muskham and Winthorpe wards 32 e Newark-on-Trent (five wards) 33 f Southwell town (three wards) 35 g Balderton North, Balderton West and Farndon wards 36 h Lowdham and Trent wards 38 Conclusions 39 Parish electoral arrangements 39 5 What happens next? 43 6 Mapping 45 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 47 B Code of practice on written consultation 51 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • CTK NEWS Also Available Online At
    CTK NEWS Also available online at www.christtheking.notts.sch.uk May 2015 Dear parents receive a letter detailing those changes very soon. In addition, This is as always an incredibly there have been some slight short half-term, however many adjustments to the School of our students have started uniform, in particular, their public examinations and regarding girls’ skirts. In due are working incredibly hard! I course, you will receive a letter know that this can be a very which outlines the details of stressful time for parents and these changes and if you have carers too and I would like to any queries, please do not thank you for the support that hesitate to contact school. you have given to your child Finally, may I wish you all a during these last few weeks very restful half term break and months. with your family and friends Dates for the Diary Half Term 23rd May—31 I would like to make you and I look forward to May aware of two major changes welcoming our students back Y10 History Trip Galleries of that will take place in in June. Justice Y12/13 A Level PE September. The timings for Moderation Day the school day will change in Best wishes English Schools Athletics Championships at Harvey September and you will Carlo Cuomo Hadden Inside this issue: CTK Cats 1 Art & Design 2 CTK Cats Athletics 3 The CTK Cats went to a competition last weekend in Leicester. The girls gained 2nd, 3rd and 4th place trophies! DoE 4 Year 7 ‘youth level 1’ team.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Declaration Register
    Landowner Declaration Register This is maintained under Section 31A of the Highways Act 1980 and Section 15B(1) of the Commons Act 2006. It comprises: Landowner deposit under S.15A(1) of the Commons Act 2006 By depositing a statement, landowners can prevent their land being registered as a Town or Village Green, provided they make the deposit before there has been 20 years recreational use of the land as of right. A new statement must be deposited within 20 years. Landowner deposit under S.31(6) of the Highways Act 1980 Highway statements and highway declarations allow landowners to prevent their land being recorded as a highway on the definitive map on the basis of presumed dedication (usually 20 years uninterrupted use). A highway statement or declaration must be followed by a further declaration within 20 years (or 10 years if lodged prior to 1 October 2013). Last Updated: September 2015 Ref Parish Landowner Details of land Highways Act 1980 CA1 Documents No. Section 31(6) 6 Date of Expiry date initial deposit A1 Alverton M P Langley The Belvedere, Alverton 17/07/2008 17/07/2018 A2 Annesley Multi owners Annesley Estate 30/03/1998 30/03/2004 expired A3 Annesley Notts Wildlife Trust Annesley Woodhouse Quarry 11/07/1997 13/01/2013 expired A4 Annesley Taylor Wimpey UK Little Oak Plantation 11/04/2012 11/04/2022 Ltd A5 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Lodge Farm, off Georgia Avenue 05/01/2009 05/01/2019 A6 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Land off Kenneth Road 05/01/2009 05/01/2019 A7 Arnold Langridge Homes Ltd Land off Calverton Road 05/11/2008 05/11/2018
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire Pharmacies Easter and May Bank Holiday 2019 Opening Times
    NOTTINGHAMSHIRE PHARMACIES EASTER AND MAY BANK HOLIDAY 2019 OPENING TIMES Telephone Good Friday Easter Sunday Easter Monday Early May Bank Holiday Spring Bank Holiday Nottingham North & East Number 19 April 2019 21 April 2019 22 April 2019 06 May 2019 27 May 2019 Asda Pharmacy, 111-127 Front Street, Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 7ED 0115 9649110 9:00am - 6:00pm Closed 9:00am - 6:00pm 9:00am - 6:00pm 9:00am - 6:00pm Boots Pharmacy, 85 Front Street, Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 7EB 0115 9262397 8:30am - 5:30pm Closed 10:00am - 4:00pm 10:00am - 4:00pm 10:00am - 4:00pm Boots Pharmacy, 49 Main Street, Burton Joyce, Nottinghamshire, NG14 5DX 0115 9312096 8:30am - 6:30pm Closed Closed Closed Closed Boots Pharmacy, 52-54 High Street, Hucknall, Nottinghamshire, NG15 7AX 0115 9633505 8:30am - 4:30pm Closed Closed Closed Closed Boots Pharmacy, 3-5 St Wilfrids Square, Calverton, Nottinghamshire, NG14 6FP 0115 9652377 8:30am - 6:30pm Closed Closed Closed Closed Boots Pharmacy, 55 High Street, Hucknall, Nottingham, NG15 7AW 0115 9632434 9:00am - 6:00pm Closed Closed Closed Closed Boots Pharmacy, Victoria Retail Park, Netherfield, Nottinghamshire, NG4 2PE 0115 9878943 9:00am – 5:30pm Closed 9:00am – 5:30pm 9:00am – 5:30pm 9:00am – 5:30pm Boots Pharmacy, 19 Carlton Square, Carlton, Nottingham, NG4 3BP 0115 9870480 8:30am - 6:00pm Closed Closed Closed Closed Harts Chemist, 106-110 Watnall Road, Hucknall, Nottingham, NG15 7JW 0115 9637612 Closed 10:00am - 12:00noon Closed Closed Closed Lloyds Pharmacy, Sainsburys Store, Nottingham Road, Arnold, Nottingham, NG5 6BN
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands
    Liberal Democrat submission for BCE 3rd consultation East Midlands Submission to the Boundary Commission for England third period of consultation: East Midlands Summary There is a factual error in the Commission’s report concerning the Liberal Democrat counter-proposals in the Leicestershire / Northamptonshire / Nottinghamshire / Rutland sub-region. We would, therefore, ask the Commission to reconsider the scheme we put forward. We welcome the change the Commission has made to its proposal for Mansfield. We welcome the fact that the Commission has kept to its original proposals in Lincolnshire, much of Derbyshire and Derby, and in Northampton. We consider that the changes that the Commission has made to four constituencies in Derbyshire, affecting the disposition of three wards, are finely balanced judgement calls with which we are content to accept the Commission’s view. The change that the Commission has made to the Kettering and Wellingborough constituencies would not have needed to be considered if it had agreed to our proposal for an unchanged Wellingborough seat. The Commission’s proposal to move the Burton Joyce and Stoke Bardolph ward into its proposed Sherwood constituency means that it is now proposing three Nottinghamshire constituencies (Bassetlaw, Broxtowe, Sherwood) which contain a ward which is inaccessible from the rest of the seat. We are not in agreement with the Commission’s failure to comply with the spirit of the legislation or the letter of its own guidelines in respect of these three proposed constituencies. We are not in agreement with the Commission’s failure to respect the boundaries of the City of Nottingham to the extent of proposing three constituencies that cross the Unitary Authority boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting of Colwick Parish Council, Held Remotely Using the Online Zoom App, at 7:00Pm on Monday 1St June 2020
    Community Centre, Vale Road Colwick Parish Council Colwick NG4 2GP 0115 9400571 Minutes of the Annual Meeting of Colwick Parish Council, held remotely using the online Zoom app, at 7:00pm on Monday 1st June 2020 In attendance: Cllrs Alison Nunn (Chair), Cllr Meredith Lawrence, Cllr Scott Handley, Cllr Janene Davis, Cllr Femi Ogundipe and Cllr Nicki Brooks, Nottinghamshire County Councillor. 1. Election of Chair: Cllr Lawrence Proposed Cllr Nunn, Cllr Handley seconded, all in favour. Cllr Nunn accepted. 2. Election of Vice Chair: Cllr Ogundipe Proposed Cllr Lawrence, Cllr Davis seconded, all in favour. Cllr Lawrence accepted. 31. Apologies for absence: None received. 32. Minutes of the previous Parish meeting held on Monday 24th February: Agreed true record of meeting, proposed by Cllr Nunn and second by Cllr Lawrence. Cllr Nunn advised the meeting held in March was not quorate therefore no minutes have been recorded. 33. Updates from previous minutes: Point c) land ownership query at the rear of St Johns School. This query has not been determined as yet. Cllr Brooks has asked Nottinghamshire Country Council for information and is awaiting a response. 34. Declarations of Interest: Cllr Lawrence is a member of the Planning Committee at GBC therefore unable to take part in planning discussions. 35. Planning: Ref: 2020/0368 – Single storey rear extension, 6 Colwick Park Close, Colwick. Cllr Nunn advised the meeting that anyone wishing to comment to do so on the Gedling Borough Council website. Colwick Parish Council 36. Observations from electors and reports from Borough and County Councillors: None received from electors.
    [Show full text]