DOCSLIB.ORG

Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project (RAAMP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RPF for Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project (RAAMP) Public Disclosure Authorized RURAL ACCESS AND AGRICULTURAL MARKETING PROJECT (RAAMP) RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK Public Disclosure Authorized FINAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized Federal Project Management Unit (FPMU) Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development NAIC House, Plot 590, Zone AO, Airport Road, Central Area, Abuja Public Disclosure Authorized September, 2019 1 RPF for Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project (RAAMP) LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AFD French Development Agency ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan FPMU Federal Project Management Unit GIS Geographical Information System GPS Global Positioning System LGA Local Government Area NEEDS National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy NPIRD National Policy on Integrated Rural Development NPRTT National Policy on Rural Travel and Transport NTP National Transport Policy PAPs Project Affected Persons PMU Project Management Unit RAAMP Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project RAP Resettlement Action Plan RTTP Rural Travel and Transport Policy SEEDS State Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy SPIU State Project Implementation Unit WB World Bank 2 RPF for Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project (RAAMP) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The Federal Government of Nigeria has initiated the preparation of the Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project (RAAMP) the successor of the Second Rural Access and Mobility Project (RAMP-2). The project will be supported with financing from the World Bank and French Development Agency (AFD) and will be guided by the Government’s Rural Travel and Transport Policy (RTTP). The lead agency for the Federal Government is the Federal Department of Rural Development (FDRD) of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (FMARD). The Federal Project Management Unit (FPMU) is overseeing the project on behalf of the FDRD, while the respective selected States Government will be responsible for the implementation of the project. The states participating in RAAMP are 13 including Kano, Katsina, Sokoto, Kebbi, Bauchi, Plateau, Kwara, Abia, Akwa Ibom, Kogi, Ogun, Oyo and Ondo. Project Components The project includes 4 components, namely: 1) Component A: Improvement of Rural Access and Trading Infrastructure. o Sub-component A.1: Major Civil Works. Support to major civil works: upgrading of rural roads and the construction of short-span (up to 15 meters) cross-drainage structures (culverts/bridges) on rural roads, and the physical improvement of the existing agro-logistics centers (rural markets); o Sub-component A.2: Consultancies and Supervision. Support to the supervision and consultancy costs linked to the civil works. 2) Component B. Asset Management, Agro-logistics Performance Enhancement and Sector Reform. o Sub-component B.1: Other Civil Works. Support the maintenance and spot improvement of rural roads; o Sub-component B.2: Support for Improving Agro-logistics Activities. Support to Agro-logistics performance enhancement activities. This will include support to farms and cooperatives to reduce post-harvest losses and support to the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) at the agro-logistics centers. The sub-component will proactively work to resolve issues faced by female entrepreneurs and market users. These activities will be identified through a targeted prior study, to be funded by the project; and o Sub-component B.3: Consultancies Studies and Supervision. This sub- component will provide technical assistance support to state-level road sector reforms activities, to the establishment of an asset management system, and to the design and supervision of civil works under the component. 3) Component C. Institutional Development, Project Management and Risk Mitigation. o Sub-component C.1: Institutional Development and Project Management. This sub-component will involve support to institutional development of the rural transport, trading infrastructure and agro-logistics activities, maintenance and management. It will also support project operating costs, technical assistance consultancies, training and study tours, project monitoring and 3 RPF for Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project (RAAMP) impact evaluation activities. Preparation activities connected to any future rural transport and trading projects, including studies and technical assistance to incorporate new states within the proposed project, will be supported by the sub- component. o Sub-component C.2: Risk Mitigation and Resiliency. This sub-component will support project risk mitigation and resiliency activities, including sexual exploitation and abuse (SEA), gender, grievance redressal, rural road safety and climate resiliency of rural roads. 4) Component D. Contingent Emergency Response (US$0 million). The component will address any unforeseen emergency infrastructure needs following a natural disaster. The activities in Component A will focus on rehabilitation of rural access roads and construction of short-span (up to 15 meters) cross-drainage structures (culverts/bridges)in selected participating States to provide all-weather access to connect rural communities to local agricultural markets. The civil works activities might cause involuntary resettlement thereby triggering the World Bank operational policy 4.12 (Involuntary resettlement). Justification for Preparing RPF At this juncture, the appropriate instrument for addressing involuntary resettlement in the project is the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF), because sufficient information about the exact nature of the works (engineering design) and specific road names and locations are not known. However, the participating states will need to prepare site specific Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) or Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plans (ARAPs) when sufficient information and specific site engineering designs of the prioritized roads would have been known and ready. The Resettlement Policy Framework clarifies resettlement principles, organizational arrangements and design criteria to be applied during RAP/ARAP implementation. Sub-project resettlement plans consistent with the RPF will subsequently be submitted to the Bank for approval after specific planning information becomes available. It should be noted that the policy is designed to mitigate harm caused by displacement or land acquisition occurring in the process of RAAMP implementation. A RPF was previously prepared and disclosed in October 9th 2018. However, with the update to the Project components, the RPF has been revised to accommodate the changes (this includes changes to the participating states). Legal Framework for Land Acquisition The legal framework for land acquisition in Nigeria is the land use Act of 1978. The relevant World Bank operational policy (OP 4.12), which addresses land acquisition and involuntary resettlement was reviewed. The differences between the Land Use Act and the Bank’s OP 4.12 are mostly in rehabilitation measures, which are neither proscribed nor mandated in the Act. Thus, it is noted in this RPF that in the event of divergence between the two, the World Bank safeguard policy shall take precedence over Nigeria Land Use Act. Potential Impacts Positive and negative impacts on the targeted areas/communities are expected in the course of RAAMP implementation phase. On the positive side, RAAMP targets the vulnerable and poor areas and people therein. It is designed to contribute to positive social outcomes relating, for 4 RPF for Rural Access and Agricultural Marketing Project (RAAMP) example, to increased well-being, providing livelihood and food security for the overall populations in targeted areas and beyond. The World Bank resettlement policy, OP 4.12 is developed to ensure that the negative impacts of RAAMP development on people do not occur. And even if it does occur, the affected persons/people are commensurately compensated for their loss (of land, property or access). Grievance Redress Mechanism Project related grievances may adversely affect successful implementation of project. It is also common knowledge that using the court (judicial system) to determine all cases of grievances may take longer periods which would not be in the interest of the project. Therefore, a best proactive measure is to set up a grievance redress mechanism (GRM) that would be used to address and resolve complaints as much as possible without going to court. This RPF stipulates 2 levels at which aggrieved Project Affected Persons (PAPs) can channel their complaints for redress. It is however, the right of the PAPs to take a matter to the court of law as the final arbiter if he/she felt dissatisfied with the judgements obtained from the grievance redress committees set up by this project. PAPs shall be communicated early during RAP/ARAP public consultation and census about the existence of the GRM and sufficient information provided to them on the grievance uptake channels. This RPF requires that each participating state should clearly indicate in the RAP/ARAP report how PAPs were informed about the channels of grievance redress uptake. RPF Coordination and Implementation The Federal PMU shall have an oversight role, but actual resettlement planning and implementation shall be the States’ PMUs responsibility. Monitoring and evaluation In order to successfully complete the resettlement management as per the implementation schedule and compliance with the policy and entitlement framework,
Recommended publications
  • The Cholera Risk Assessment in Kano State, Nigeria: a Historical Review, Mapping of Hotspots and Evaluation of Contextual Factors

    The Cholera Risk Assessment in Kano State, Nigeria: a Historical Review, Mapping of Hotspots and Evaluation of Contextual Factors

    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES RESEARCH ARTICLE The cholera risk assessment in Kano State, Nigeria: A historical review, mapping of hotspots and evaluation of contextual factors 1 2 2 2 Moise Chi NgwaID *, Chikwe Ihekweazu , Tochi OkworID , Sebastian Yennan , 2 3 4 5 Nanpring Williams , Kelly ElimianID , Nura Yahaya Karaye , Imam Wada BelloID , David A. Sack1 1 Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America, 2 Nigeria Centre for Disease Control, Abuja, Nigeria, 3 Department of a1111111111 Microbiology, University of Benin, Nigeria, 4 Department of Public Health and Disease Control, Kano State a1111111111 Ministry of Health, Kano, Nigeria, 5 Department of Public Health and Disease Control, Ministry of Health a1111111111 Kano, Kano, Nigeria a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Nigeria is endemic for cholera since 1970, and Kano State report outbreaks annually with Citation: Ngwa MC, Ihekweazu C, Okwor T, Yennan high case fatality ratios ranging from 4.98%/2010 to 5.10%/2018 over the last decade. How- S, Williams N, Elimian K, et al. (2021) The cholera ever, interventions focused on cholera prevention and control have been hampered by a risk assessment in Kano State, Nigeria: A historical lack of understanding of hotspot Local Government Areas (LGAs) that trigger and sustain review, mapping of hotspots and evaluation of contextual factors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 15(1): yearly outbreaks. The goal of this study was to identify and categorize cholera hotspots in e0009046. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. Kano State to inform a national plan for disease control and elimination in the State.
  • The World Bank Implementation Status & Results

    The World Bank Implementation Status & Results

    The World Bank Report No: ISR4370 Implementation Status & Results Nigeria THIRD NATIONAL FADAMA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FADAMA III) (P096572) Operation Name: THIRD NATIONAL FADAMA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Project Stage: Implementation Seq.No: 7 Status: ARCHIVED Archive Date: (FADAMA III) (P096572) Country: Nigeria Approval FY: 2009 Product Line:IBRD/IDA Region: AFRICA Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan Implementing Agency(ies): National Fadama Coordination Office(NFCO) Key Dates Public Disclosure Copy Board Approval Date 01-Jul-2008 Original Closing Date 31-Dec-2013 Planned Mid Term Review Date 07-Nov-2011 Last Archived ISR Date 11-Feb-2011 Effectiveness Date 23-Mar-2009 Revised Closing Date 31-Dec-2013 Actual Mid Term Review Date Project Development Objectives Component(s) Component Name Component Cost Capacity Building, Local Government, and Communications and Information Support 87.50 Small-Scale Community-owned Infrastructure 75.00 Advisory Services and Input Support 39.50 Support to the ADPs and Adaptive Research 36.50 Asset Acquisition 150.00 Project Administration, Monitoring and Evaluation 58.80 Overall Ratings Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Risk Rating Low Low Implementation Status Overview As at August 19, 2011, disbursement status of the project stands at 46.87%. All the states have disbursed to most of the FCAs/FUGs except Jigawa and Edo where disbursement was delayed for political reasons. The savings in FUEF accounts has increased to a total ofN66,133,814.76. 75% of the SFCOs have federated their FCAs up to the state level while FCAs in 8 states have only been federated up to the Local Government levels.
  • Violence in Nigeria's North West

    Violence in Nigeria's North West

    Violence in Nigeria’s North West: Rolling Back the Mayhem Africa Report N°288 | 18 May 2020 Headquarters International Crisis Group Avenue Louise 235 • 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 • Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Preventing War. Shaping Peace. Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Community Conflicts, Criminal Gangs and Jihadists ...................................................... 5 A. Farmers and Vigilantes versus Herders and Bandits ................................................ 6 B. Criminal Violence ...................................................................................................... 9 C. Jihadist Violence ........................................................................................................ 11 III. Effects of Violence ............................................................................................................ 15 A. Humanitarian and Social Impact .............................................................................. 15 B. Economic Impact ....................................................................................................... 16 C. Impact on Overall National Security ......................................................................... 17 IV. ISWAP, the North West and
  • Rural Non-Farm Income and Inequality in Nigeria

    Rural Non-Farm Income and Inequality in Nigeria

    2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION, DATA AND SURVEY AREA The utilized data were collected from five different villages surveyed in rural Northern Nigeria between 2004 and 2005. These villages are situated within the Hadejia-Nguru floodplain wetlands of Jigawa state in Northern Nigeria. Data were collected from 200 households selected using a multi-stage stratified random sampling approach. The first sampling stratum was selection of the dry savanna region of northern Nigeria, which comprises six states: Sokoto, Kebbi, Zamfara, Kano, Kaduna and Jigawa. The second stratum was the selection of Jigawa state. Two important elements informed this choice. First, Jigawa state, which was carved out of Kano state in August 1991, has the highest rural population in Nigeria; about 93 percent of the state’s population dwells in rural areas3. Second, agriculture is the dominant sector of the state’s economy, providing employment for over 90 percent of the active labor force. For effective grassroots coverage of the various agricultural activities in Jigawa state, the Jigawa Agricultural and Rural Development (JARDA) is divided into four operational zones that are headquartered in the cities of Birni Kudu, Gumel, Hadejia and Kazaure. Hadejia was selected for this study, forming the third stratum of sampling. Within the Hadejia emirate, there are eight Local Government Areas (LGAs): Auyo, Birniwa, Hadejia, Kaffin-Hausa, Mallam Madori, Kaugama, Kirikasamma and Guri. Kirikasamma LGA was selected for this study, representing the fourth sampling stratum. Kirikassama LGA was specifically chosen because of the area’s intensive economic development and correspondingly higher human population compared to many other parts of Nigeria. In the fifth stratum of sampling, five villages were selected from Kirikassama LGA: Jiyan, Likori, Matarar Galadima, Turabu and Madachi.
  • Nigeria's Constitution of 1999

    Nigeria's Constitution of 1999

    PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 constituteproject.org Nigeria's Constitution of 1999 This complete constitution has been generated from excerpts of texts from the repository of the Comparative Constitutions Project, and distributed on constituteproject.org. constituteproject.org PDF generated: 26 Aug 2021, 16:42 Table of contents Preamble . 5 Chapter I: General Provisions . 5 Part I: Federal Republic of Nigeria . 5 Part II: Powers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria . 6 Chapter II: Fundamental Objectives and Directive Principles of State Policy . 13 Chapter III: Citizenship . 17 Chapter IV: Fundamental Rights . 20 Chapter V: The Legislature . 28 Part I: National Assembly . 28 A. Composition and Staff of National Assembly . 28 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of National Assembly . 29 C. Qualifications for Membership of National Assembly and Right of Attendance . 32 D. Elections to National Assembly . 35 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 36 Part II: House of Assembly of a State . 40 A. Composition and Staff of House of Assembly . 40 B. Procedure for Summoning and Dissolution of House of Assembly . 41 C. Qualification for Membership of House of Assembly and Right of Attendance . 43 D. Elections to a House of Assembly . 45 E. Powers and Control over Public Funds . 47 Chapter VI: The Executive . 50 Part I: Federal Executive . 50 A. The President of the Federation . 50 B. Establishment of Certain Federal Executive Bodies . 58 C. Public Revenue . 61 D. The Public Service of the Federation . 63 Part II: State Executive . 65 A. Governor of a State . 65 B. Establishment of Certain State Executive Bodies .
  • “Political Shari'a”? Human Rights and Islamic Law in Northern Nigeria

    “Political Shari'a”? Human Rights and Islamic Law in Northern Nigeria

    Human Rights Watch September 2004 Vol. 16, No. 9 (A) “Political Shari’a”? Human Rights and Islamic Law in Northern Nigeria I. Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 6 To Nigerian government and judicial authorities, at federal and state levels ............... 6 To foreign governments and intergovernmental organizations...................................... 8 III. Background ............................................................................................................................. 9 Shari’a.....................................................................................................................................10 IV. The extension of Shari’a to criminal law in Nigeria........................................................13 Shari’a courts and appeal procedures................................................................................18 The role of the “ulama” ......................................................................................................19 Choice of courts...................................................................................................................19 V. Human rights violations under Shari’a in northern Nigeria............................................21 Use of the death penalty .....................................................................................................21
  • Preliminary Assessment of the Distribution of Large Mammals Within Idanre Forest Reserve, Ondo State, Nigeria

    Preliminary Assessment of the Distribution of Large Mammals Within Idanre Forest Reserve, Ondo State, Nigeria

    Awoku and Ogunjemite, 2019 Journal of Research in Forestry, Wildlife & Environment Vol. 11(4) December, 2019 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] http://www.ajol.info/index.php/jrfwe 140 jfewr ©2019 - jfewr Publications This work is licensed under a ISBN: 2141 – 1778 Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Awoku and Ogunjemite, 2019 License PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF LARGE MAMMALS WITHIN IDANRE FOREST RESERVE, ONDO STATE, NIGERIA Awoku, G. S. and Ogunjemite, B. G. Department of Ecotourism and Wildlife Management, Federal University of Technology, Akure. Corresponding Author email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The distribution of large mammals in Idanre Forest Reserve was assessed using the line transect method with a total number of five (5) transect lines and employing the use of Global Positioning System (GPS) to take the different points and location of different species of large mammals both sighted directly and indirectly. It was observed that transect C and D (within the undisturbed forest) 45 and 38 sightings respectively which were evenly distributed within this transects. It was also observed that transect C had 30.41 % the highest rate occurrence in terms of distribution of signs of large mammals. The study also revealed that in terms of vegetation cover preference, all of the large mammals were distributed with the undisturbed forest habitat while the Cephalophus silvicultor were not distributed within the disturbed forest and the farm land .Also, all the primates were available within all the habitat types with the exception of Cercocerbus torquatus which is not distributed within the Cercocebus torquatus farmland. The research revealed that there are still some significant amounts of large mammals within the reserve and if well conserved in terms of enforcement of strict adherence to forest laws, there will be an increase in terms of the distribution within their natural habitat and reduced dispersal outside their natural place of abode.
  • Petroleum Extraction, Agriculture and Local Communities in the Niger Delta

    Petroleum Extraction, Agriculture and Local Communities in the Niger Delta

    Petroleum Extraction, Agriculture and Local Communities in the Niger Delta. A Case of Ilaje Community. Adedayo Ladelokun Howard University Chapter I: Introduction Petroleum resource exploration and extraction-- ● A crucial economic activity ● Petroleum resources contributed substantially to economic development ● Conversely, petroleum exploration and extraction often induce negative impacts on other economic activities such as agriculture. ● Threatens environmental Safety. ● Ilaje Community,Ondo State,Nigeria, was chosen as a case study. Introduction Cont. ● Location and member states of the Niger Delta. Located in Coastal Southern Region of Nigeria. Map of the Niger Delta region Niger Delta Image of the Niger Delta Source: Ken Saro-Wiwa 20 years on Niger Delta ... Cnn.com Map of Ondo State Showing the 18 Local Government Areas Ilaje Local Government Introduction Cont. ● Population --- Estimated at 46 Million(UNDP) ● Geographical Landmark --- ND Covers area over 70,000 Sq Kilometers (ie 27,000 Miles) ● Occupation --- Farming, Fishing, Canoe Making, Trading, Net Making, and Mat Making. ● Ilaje Community --- Occupies Atlantic Coastline of Ondo State,Nigeria. ● Ilaje Local Government (Polluted Area) was one of the 18 Local Governments in Ondo State, Nigeria. ● Five Local Governments were randomly selected to served as control. Scope of the study This research work will cover Ilaje Community in Ondo State. Ondo State is located in the petroleum producing area of the Niger Delta Ilaje community was mainly into agricultural production Chapter II: Literature Review ● Agriculture in Economic Development of Nigeria: ○ Machinery for life sustenance ○ Supportive role raw material provision for industrial development ○ Todaro MP (2000) viewed role of AG as passive and supportive ○ Precondition for eco developed ○ Rapid structural transformation of the AG sector Literature Review Continues Jhingan M.L (1985) opined that: (a) AG provides food surplus for the rapidly expanding population.
  • Proof of Influence Evaluation of the Nigeria Evidence‐Based Health System Initiative (NEHSI)

    Proof of Influence Evaluation of the Nigeria Evidence‐Based Health System Initiative (NEHSI)

    Proof of Influence Evaluation of the Nigeria Evidence‐based Health System Initiative (NEHSI) Commissioned by the Evaluation Sub-Committee of the Project Advisory Committee and the Governance for Equity in Health Programme, The International Development Research Centre, Canada. Report written by the Evaluation Technical Advisory Committee (Muhammed M Lecky (IDRC-NEHSI Senior Advisor), Sarah BJ Macfarlane (Independent Consultant), Ricardo Wilson-Grau (Independent Consultant)) July 15th 2014 Executive Summary Between 2008 and 2014, the Government of Nigeria implemented the Nigeria Evidence‐based Health System Initiative (NEHSI), with support from Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada (DFATD). NEHSI undertook activities to increase the generation and use of evidence for decision-making in Bauchi and Cross River states with the goal of strengthening the health care system to deliver effective, efficient and equitable primary health care (PHC). In 2012, the Evaluation Sub-Committee of NEHSI’s Project Advisory Committee commissioned this evaluation to explore NEHSI’s ‘proof of influence’ by examining its outcomes to answer two questions: Evaluation question 1: To what extent and how has NEHSI influenced the evidence-based planning and decision-making (through changes in knowledge use, capacity, habit, and governance processes) in the primary health care system in particular and in the health system in general at the individual, community, and institutional level (federal, Bauchi State, Cross River State, and local government areas (LGA))? Evaluation question 2: Sustainabilty: To what extent do the NEHSI outcomes achieved to date a) reinforce each other, and b) embody the principles of evidence-based planning and decision-making in the Nigerian primary health care system? The evaluation team, which was advised by IDRC and the Evaluation Sub-Committee, comprised two independent consultants and one IDRC-NEHSI Senior Advisor.
  • About the Contributors

    About the Contributors

    ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS EDITORS MARINGE, Felix is Head of Research at the School of Education and Assistant Dean for Internationalization and Partnerships in the Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. With Dr Emmanuel Ojo, he was host organizer of the Higher Education Research and Policy Network (HERPNET) 10th Regional Higher Education Conference on Sustainable Transformation and Higher Education held in South Africa in September 2015. Felix has the unique experience of working in higher education in three different countries, Zimbabwe; the United Kingdom and in South Africa. Over a thirty year period, Felix has published 60 articles in scholarly journals, written and co-edited 4 books, has 15 chapters in edited books and contributed to national and international research reports. Felix is a full professor of higher education at the School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand (WSoE) specialising in research around leadership, internationalisation and globalisation in higher education. OJO, Emmanuel is lecturer at the School of Education, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. He is actively involved in higher education research. His recent publication is a co-authored book chapter focusing on young faculty in South African higher education, titled, Challenges and Opportunities for New Faculty in South African Higher Education Young Faculty in the Twenty-First Century: International Perspectives (pp. 253-283) published by the State University of New York Press (SUNY). He is on the editorial board of two international journals: Journal of Higher Education in Africa (JHEA), a CODESRIA publication and Journal of Human Behaviour in the Social Environment, a Taylor & Francis publication.
  • Cooperative Agreement AID-620-A-00002

    Cooperative Agreement AID-620-A-00002

    Cooperative Agreement AID-620-A-00002 Activity Summary Implementing Partner: Family Health International (FHI 360) Activity Name: Strengthening Integrated Delivery of HIV/AIDS Services (SIDHAS) Activity Objective: To sustain cross sectional integration of HIV/AIDS and TB services by building Nigerian capacity to deliver sustainable high quality, comprehensive, prevention, treatment, care and related services. This will be achieved through three key result areas: 1) Increased access to high-quality comprehensive HIV/AIDS and TB prevention, treatment, care and related services through improved efficiencies in service delivery. 2) Improved cross sectional integration of high quality HIV/AIDS and TB services 3) Improved stewardship by Nigerian institutions for the provision of high-quality comprehensive HIV/AIDS and TB services. USAID’s Assistance Objective 3 (AO 3): A sustained, effective Nigerian-led HIV/AIDS and TB response Life of Activity (start and end dates): Sept 12, 2011 – Sept 11, 2016 Report Submitted by: Phyllis Jones-Changa Submission Date: July 30, 2014 2 Table of contents Activity Summary................................................................................................................................... 2 Table of contents................................................................................................................................. 3 Acronyms and abbreviations............................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary...........................................................................................................................
  • AFRREV STECH, Vol. 3(2) May, 2014

    AFRREV STECH, Vol. 3(2) May, 2014

    AFRREV STECH, Vol. 3(2) May, 2014 AFRREV STECH An International Journal of Science and Technology Bahir Dar, Ethiopia Vol. 3 (2), S/No 7, May, 2014: 51-65 ISSN 2225-8612 (Print) ISSN 2227-5444 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/stech.v3i2.4 THE USE OF COMPOSITE WATER POVERTY INDEX IN ASSESSING WATER SCARCITY IN THE RURAL AREAS OF OYO STATE, NIGERIA IFABIYI, IFATOKUN PAUL Department of Geography and Environmental Management, Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ilorin; Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria E-mail: 234 8033231626 & OGUNBODE, TIMOTHY OYEBAMIJI Faculty of Law Bowen University, Iwo Osun State, Nigeria Abstract Physical availability of water resources is beneficial to man when it is readily accessible. Oyo State is noted for abundant surface water and appreciable groundwater resources in its pockets of regolith aquifers; as it has about eight months of rainy season and a relatively deep weathered regolith. In spite of this, cases of water associated diseases Copyright© IAARR 2014: www.afrrevjo.net 51 Indexed and Listed in AJOL, ARRONET AFRREV STECH, Vol. 3(2) May, 2014 and deaths have been reported in the rural areas of the state. This study attempts to conduct an investigation into accessibility to potable water in the rural areas of Oyo State, Nigeria via the component approach of water poverty index (WPI). Multistage method of sampling was applied to select 5 rural communities from 25 rural LGAs out of the 33 LGAs in the State. Data were collected through the administration of 1,250 copies of questionnaire across 125 rural communities. Component Index method as developed by Sullivan, et al (2003) was modified and used in this study.