Table of Artificial Satellites Launched in 1981
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment
NASA Reference Publication 1390 - j Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield, R.D. Leach, and M.B. Alexander, Editor August 1996 NASA Reference Publication 1390 Spacecraft System Failures and Anomalies Attributed to the Natural Space Environment K.L. Bedingfield Universities Space Research Association • Huntsville, Alabama R.D. Leach Computer Sciences Corporation • Huntsville, Alabama M.B. Alexander, Editor Marshall Space Flight Center • MSFC, Alabama National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center ° MSFC, Alabama 35812 August 1996 PREFACE The effects of the natural space environment on spacecraft design, development, and operation are the topic of a series of NASA Reference Publications currently being developed by the Electromagnetics and Aerospace Environments Branch, Systems Analysis and Integration Laboratory, Marshall Space Flight Center. This primer provides an overview of seven major areas of the natural space environment including brief definitions, related programmatic issues, and effects on various spacecraft subsystems. The primary focus is to present more than 100 case histories of spacecraft failures and anomalies documented from 1974 through 1994 attributed to the natural space environment. A better understanding of the natural space environment and its effects will enable spacecraft designers and managers to more effectively minimize program risks and costs, optimize design quality, and achieve mission objectives. .o° 111 TABLE OF CONTENTS -
California State University, Northridge Low Earth Orbit
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE LOW EARTH ORBIT BUSINESS CENTER A Project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering by Dallas Gene Bienhoff May 1985 The Proj'ectof Dallas Gene Bienhoff is approved: Dr. B. J. Bluth Professor T1mothy Wm. Fox - Chair California State University, Northridge ii iii ACKNOWLEDGEHENTS I wish to express my gratitude to those who have helped me over the years to complete this thesis by providing encouragement, prodding and understanding: my advisor, Tim Fox, Chair of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering; Dr. B. J. Bluth for her excellent comments on human factors; Dr. B. J. Campbell for improving the clarity; Richard Swaim, design engineer at Rocketdyne Division of Rockwell International for providing excellent engineering drawings of LEOBC; Mike Morrow, of the Advanced Engineering Department at Rockwell International who provided the Low Earth Orbit Business Center panel figures; Bob Bovill, a commercial artist, who did all the artistic drawings because of his interest in space commercialization; Linda Martin for her word processing skills; my wife, Yolanda, for egging me on without nagging; and finally Erik and Danielle for putting up with the excuse, "I have to v10rk on my paper," for too many years. iv 0 ' PREFACE The Low Earth Orbit Business Center (LEOBC) was initially conceived as a modular structure to be launched aboard the Space Shuttle, it evolved to its present configuration as a result of research, discussions and the desire to increase the efficiency of space utilization. Although the idea of placing space stations into Earth orbit is not new, as is discussed in the first chapter, and the configuration offers nothing new, LEOBC is unique in its application. -
Spacecalc Current Space Demographics
CBS News/Spaceflight Now Current Space Demographics Page 1 SpaceCalc Current Space Demographics Post Soyuz TMA-05M Nation No. Rank Space Endurance Days/FLTs Total Fliers 528 1 Afghanistan 1 1 Sergei Krikalev 803/6 Nations 38 2 Austria 1 2 Alexander Kaleri 770/5 Men 472 3 Belgium 2 3 Sergei Avdeyev 748/3 Women 56 4 Brazil 1 4 Valery Polyakov 679/2 Total Tickets 1189 5 Bulgaria 2 5 Anatoly Solovyev 652/5 6 Canada 9 6 Gennady Padalka 586/3 United States 335 7 China 8 7 Victor Afanasyev 556/4 US Men 290 8 Cuba 1 8 Yury Usachev 553/4 US Women 45 9 Czech. 1 9 Musa Manarov 541/2 10 E. Germany 1 10 Yuri Malenchenko 515/4 Soviet Union 72 11 France 9 11 Alexander Viktorenko 489/4 USSR Men 70 12 Germany 9 12 Nikolai Budarin 446/3 USSR Women 2 13 Hungary 1 13 Yuri Romanenko 430/3 Russia/CIS 40 14 India 1 14 Alexander Volkov 392/3 Russian Men 39 15 Israel 1 15 Yury Onufrienko 389/2 Russian Women 1 16 Italy 5 16 Vladimir Titov 387/4 17 Japan 9 17 Vasily Tsibliev 383/2 Others 81 18 Kazakhstan 1 18 Mike Fincke 382/3 Other Men 73 19 Malaysia 1 19 Valery Korzun 382/2 Other Women 8 20 Mexico 1 20 Pavel Vinogradov 381/2 21 Mongolia 1 21 Peggy Whitson 377/2 Men with 7 flights 2 22 Netherlands 2 22 Leonid Kizim 375/3 Women with 7 flights 0 23 N. -
Desind Finding
NATIONAL AIR AND SPACE ARCHIVES Herbert Stephen Desind Collection Accession No. 1997-0014 NASM 9A00657 National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC Brian D. Nicklas © Smithsonian Institution, 2003 NASM Archives Desind Collection 1997-0014 Herbert Stephen Desind Collection 109 Cubic Feet, 305 Boxes Biographical Note Herbert Stephen Desind was a Washington, DC area native born on January 15, 1945, raised in Silver Spring, Maryland and educated at the University of Maryland. He obtained his BA degree in Communications at Maryland in 1967, and began working in the local public schools as a science teacher. At the time of his death, in October 1992, he was a high school teacher and a freelance writer/lecturer on spaceflight. Desind also was an avid model rocketeer, specializing in using the Estes Cineroc, a model rocket with an 8mm movie camera mounted in the nose. To many members of the National Association of Rocketry (NAR), he was known as “Mr. Cineroc.” His extensive requests worldwide for information and photographs of rocketry programs even led to a visit from FBI agents who asked him about the nature of his activities. Mr. Desind used the collection to support his writings in NAR publications, and his building scale model rockets for NAR competitions. Desind also used the material in the classroom, and in promoting model rocket clubs to foster an interest in spaceflight among his students. Desind entered the NASA Teacher in Space program in 1985, but it is not clear how far along his submission rose in the selection process. He was not a semi-finalist, although he had a strong application. -
Part 2 Almaz, Salyut, And
Part 2 Almaz/Salyut/Mir largely concerned with assembly in 12, 1964, Chelomei called upon his Part 2 Earth orbit of a vehicle for circumlu- staff to develop a military station for Almaz, Salyut, nar flight, but also described a small two to three cosmonauts, with a station made up of independently design life of 1 to 2 years. They and Mir launched modules. Three cosmo- designed an integrated system: a nauts were to reach the station single-launch space station dubbed aboard a manned transport spacecraft Almaz (“diamond”) and a Transport called Siber (or Sever) (“north”), Logistics Spacecraft (Russian 2.1 Overview shown in figure 2-2. They would acronym TKS) for reaching it (see live in a habitation module and section 3.3). Chelomei’s three-stage Figure 2-1 is a space station family observe Earth from a “science- Proton booster would launch them tree depicting the evolutionary package” module. Korolev’s Vostok both. Almaz was to be equipped relationships described in this rocket (a converted ICBM) was with a crew capsule, radar remote- section. tapped to launch both Siber and the sensing apparatus for imaging the station modules. In 1965, Korolev Earth’s surface, cameras, two reentry 2.1.1 Early Concepts (1903, proposed a 90-ton space station to be capsules for returning data to Earth, 1962) launched by the N-1 rocket. It was and an antiaircraft cannon to defend to have had a docking module with against American attack.5 An ports for four Soyuz spacecraft.2, 3 interdepartmental commission The space station concept is very old approved the system in 1967. -
NOAA NESDIS Independent Review Team Final Report 2017 Preface
NOAA NESDIS Independent Review Team Final Report 2017 Preface “Progress in understanding and predicting weather is one of the great success stories of twentieth century science. Advances in basic understanding of weather dynamics and physics, the establishment of a global observing system, and the advent of numerical weather prediction put weather forecasting on a solid scientific foundation, and the deployment of weather radar and satellites together with emergency preparedness programs led to dramatic declines in deaths from severe weather phenomena such as hurricanes and tornadoes.“ “The Atmospheric Sciences Entering the Twenty-First Century”, National Academy of Sciences, 1998. 2 Acknowledgements ▪ The following organizations provided numerous briefings, detailed discussions and extensive background material to this Independent Review Team (IRT): – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) – National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) – Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite R-Series (GOES-R) Program Office – Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS) Program Office – NOAA/National Environmental Satellite, Data, and information Service (NESDIS) IRT Liaison Support Staff • Kelly Turner Government IRT Liaison • Charles Powell Government IRT Liaison • Michelle Winstead NOAA Support • Kevin Belanga NESDIS Support • Brian Mischel NESDIS Support ▪ This IRT is grateful for their quality support and commitment to NESDIS’ mission necessary for this assessment. 3 Overview ▪ Objective ▪ NESDIS IRT History ▪ Methodology -
Association of Space Explorers 10Th Planetary Congress Moscow/Lake Baikal, Russia 1994
Association of Space Explorers 10th Planetary Congress Moscow/Lake Baikal, Russia 1994 Commemorative Poster Signature Key Loren Acton Viktor Afanasyev Toyohiro Akiyama STS 51F Soyuz TM-11 Soyuz TM-11 Vladimir Aksyonov Sultan bin Salman al-Saud Buzz Aldrin Soyuz 22, Soyuz T-2 STS 51G Gemini 12, Apollo 11 Alexander Alexandrov Anatoli Artsebarsky Oleg Atkov Soyuz T-9, Soyuz TM-3 Soyuz TM-12 Soyuz T-10 Toktar Aubakirov Alexander Balandin Georgi Beregovoi Soyuz TM-13 Soyuz TM-9 Soyuz 3 Anatoli Berezovoi Karol Bobko Roberta Bondar Soyuz T-5 STS 6, STS 51D, STS 51J STS 42 Scott Carpenter John Creighton Vladimir Dzhanibekov Mercury 7 STS 51G, STS 36, STS 48 Soyuz 27, Soyuz 39, Soyuz T-6 Soyuz T-12, Soyuz T-13 John Fabian Mohammed Faris Bertalan Farkas STS 7, STS 41G Soyuz TM-3 Soyuz 36 Anatoli Filipchenko Dirk Frimout Owen Garriott Soyuz 7, Soyuz 16 STS 45 Skylab III, STS 9 Yuri Glazkov Georgi Grechko Alexei Gubarev Soyuz 24 Soyuz 17, Soyuz 26 Soyuz 17, Soyuz 28 Soyuz T-14 Miroslaw Hermaszewski Alexander Ivanchenkov Alexander Kaleri Soyuz 30 Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-6 Soyuz TM-14 Yevgeni Khrunov Pyotr Klimuk Vladimir Kovolyonok Soyuz 5 Soyuz 13, Soyuz 18, Soyuz 30 Soyuz 25, Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-4 Valeri Kubasov Alexei Leonov Byron Lichtenberg Soyuz 6, Apollo-Soyuz Voskhod 2, Apollo-Soyuz STS 9, STS 45 Soyuz 36 Don Lind Jack Lousma Vladimir Lyakhov STS 51B Skylab III, STS 3 Soyuz 32, Soyuz T-9 Soyuz TM-6 Oleg Makarov Gennadi Manakov Jon McBride Soyuz 12, Soyuz 27, Soyuz T-3 Soyuz TM-10, Soyuz TM-16 STS 41G Ulf Merbold Mamoru Mohri Donald Peterson STS 9, -
XIV Congress
Association of Space Explorers 14th Planetary Congress Brussels, Belgium 1998 Commemorative Poster Signature Key Loren Acton Toyohiro Akiyama Alexander Alexandrov (Bul.) STS 51F Soyuz TM-11 Soyuz TM-5 Oleg Atkov Toktar Aubakirov Yuri Baturin Soyuz T-10 Soyuz TM-13 Soyuz TM-28 Anatoli Berezovoi Karol Bobko Nikolai Budarin Soyuz T-5 STS 6, STS 51D, STS 51J STS 71, Soyuz TM-27 Valeri Bykovsky Kenneth Cameron Robert Cenker Vostok 5, Soyuz 22, Soyuz 31 STS 37, STS 56, STS 74 STS 61C Roger Crouch Samuel Durrance Reinhold Ewald STS 83, STS 94 STS 35, STS 67 Soyuz TM-25 John Fabian Mohammed Faris Bertalan Farkas STS 7, STS 51G Soyuz TM-3 Soyuz 36 Anatoli Filipchenko Dirk Frimout Owen Garriott Soyuz 7, Soyuz 16 STS 45 Skylab III, STS 9 Viktor Gorbatko Georgi Grechko Alexei Gubarev Soyuz 7, Soyuz 24, Soyuz 37 Soyuz 17, Soyuz 26 Soyuz 17, Soyuz 28 Soyuz T-14 Jugderdemidyn Gurragchaa Henry Hartsfield, Jr. Terence Henricks Soyuz 39 STS 4, STS 41D, STS 61A STS 44, STS 55, STS 70 STS 78 Miroslaw Hermaszewski Richard Hieb Millie Hughes-Fulford Soyuz 30 STS 39, STS 49, STS 65 STS 40 Alexander Ivanchenkov Georgi Ivanov Sigmund Jahn Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-6 Soyuz 33 Soyuz 31 Alexander Kaleri Valeri Korzun Valeri Kubasov Soyuz TM-14, Soyuz TM-26 Soyuz TM-24 Soyuz 6, Apollo-Soyuz Soyuz 36 Alexander Lazutkin Alexei Leonov Byron Lichtenberg Soyuz TM-25 Voskhod 2, Apollo-Soyuz STS 9, STS 45 Vladimir Lyakhov Oleg Makarov Musa Manarov Soyuz 32, Soyuz T-9 Soyuz 12, Soyuz 27, Soyuz T-3 Soyuz TM-4, Soyuz TM-11 Soyuz TM-6 Jon McBride Ulf Merbold Ernst Messerschmid STS 41G -
Index of Astronomia Nova
Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K. -
Space Shuttle Mission Sts-41D Press Kit August 1984
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION SPACE SHUTTLE MISSION STS-41D PRESS KIT AUGUST 1984 FIRST FLIGHT OF DISCOVERY SBS-4, LEASAT-2, TELSTAR-3 DEPLOYMENT; OAST-1 Edited by Richard W. Orloff, 01/2001/Page 1 STS-41D INSIGNIA S84-26391 -- The insignia for the STS-41D mission features the Discovery, NASA's third orbital vehicle, as it makes its maiden voyage. The ghost ship represents the orbiter's namesakes which have figured prominently in the history of exploration. The space shuttle Discovery heads for new horizons to extend that proud tradition. The NASA insignia design for space shuttle flights is reserved for use by the astronauts and for other official use as the NASA Administrator may authorize. Public availability has been approved only in the form of illustrations by the various news media. When and if there is any change in this policy, which we do not anticipate, it will be publicly announced. PHOTO CREDIT: NASA or National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Edited by Richard W. Orloff, 01/2001/Page 2 RELEASE NO: 8 4 - 117 August 1984 CONTACTS Charles Redmond/Debra Rahn Headquarters, Washington, D.C. (Phone: 202/453-8590) Dick Young Kennedy Space Center, Fla. (Phone: 305/867-2468) Dave Alter Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas (Phone: 713/483-5111) Bob Ruhl Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala. (Phone: 205/453-0034) Ralph Jackson Dryden Flight Research Facility, Edwards, Calif. (Phone: 805/258-8381) Edited by Richard W. Orloff, 01/2001/Page 3 RELEASE NO: 8 4 - 117 August 1984 CONTENTS GENERAL RELEASE 5 41-D BRIEFING SCHEDULE 7 GENERAL INFORMATION 8 MISSION 41-D REMANIFEST -- QUICK LOOK FACTS 9 SUMMARY OF MAJOR ACTIVITIES 10 41-D REMANIFEST SEQUENCE OF EVENTS 12 CONFIGURATION AND WEIGHTS 13 SBS-4 15 LEASAT 2 (Syncom IV-2) 16 TELSTAR 3 18 OAST-1 19 Solar Array Experiment 22 Dynamic Augmentation Experiment 23 Solar Cell Calibration Facility 23 OAST-1 Team 23 CONTINUOS FLOW ELECTROPHORESIS SYSTEM 25 VEHICLE GLOW EXPERIMENT 27 CLOUDS 27 IMAX 27 SHUTTLE STUDENT INVOLVEMENT PROJECT 28 41-D FLIGHT CREW DATA 29 Edited by Richard W. -
Nos. 13-1231 & 13-1232 Washington, D.C. 20530
USCA Case #13-1231 Document #1472126 Filed: 12/23/2013 Page 1 of 98 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED BRIEF FOR RESPONDENTS IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT NOS. 13-1231 & 13-1232 SPECTRUM FIVE LLC, APPELLANT, V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, APPELLEE. SPECTRUM FIVE LLC, PETITIONER, V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS. ON APPEAL FROM AND PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WILLIAM J. BAER JONATHAN B. SALLET ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL ACTING GENERAL COUNSEL ROBERT B. NICHOLSON JACOB M. LEWIS ROBERT J. WIGGERS ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL ATTORNEYS MATTHEW J. DUNNE UNITED STATES COUNSEL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20530 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 (202) 418-1740 USCA Case #13-1231 Document #1472126 Filed: 12/23/2013 Page 2 of 98 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), Appellee/Respondent the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and Respondent the United States certify as follows: 1. Parties. The parties appearing before the FCC were DIRECTV Enterprises, LLC; EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation; the Government of Bermuda; Radiocommunications Agency Netherlands; SES S.A.; and Spectrum Five LLC. The parties appearing before this Court are Appellant/Petitioner Spectrum Five LLC; Appelle/Respondent the FCC; Respondent the United States in No. 13-1232 only; and Intervenor EchoStar Satellite Operating Corporation. 2. Ruling under review. The ruling under review is Memorandum Opinion and Order, EchoStar Satellite Operating Company; Application for Special Temporary Authority Relating to Moving the EchoStar 6 Satellite from the 77° W.L. -
SPACE APPLICATIONS **DB Chap 2 (09-56) 1/17/02 2:15 PM Page 11
**DB Chap 2 (09-56) 1/17/02 2:15 PM Page 9 CHAPTER TWO SPACE APPLICATIONS **DB Chap 2 (09-56) 1/17/02 2:15 PM Page 11 CHAPTER TWO SPACE APPLICATIONS Introduction From NASA’s inception, the application of space research and tech- nology to specific needs of the United States and the world has been a pri- mary agency focus. The years from 1979 to 1988 were no exception, and the advent of the Space Shuttle added new ways of gathering data for these purposes. NASA had the option of using instruments that remained aboard the Shuttle to conduct its experiments in a microgravity environ- ment, as well as to deploy instrument-laden satellites into space. In addi- tion, investigators could deploy and retrieve satellites using the remote manipulator system, the Shuttle could carry sensors that monitored the environment at varying distances from the Shuttle, and payload special- ists could monitor and work with experimental equipment and materials in real time. The Shuttle also allowed experiments to be performed directly on human beings. The astronauts themselves were unique laboratory ani- mals, and their responses to the microgravity environment in which they worked and lived were thoroughly monitored and documented. In addition to the applications missions conducted aboard the Shuttle, NASA launched ninety-one applications satellites during the decade, most of which went into successful orbit and achieved their mission objectives. NASA’s degree of involvement with these missions varied. In some, NASA was the primary participant. Some were cooperative mis- sions with other agencies. In still others, NASA provided only launch support.