DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Impact Assessment Report Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Impact Assessment Report Final THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MINISTRY OF WATER AND IRRIGATION WATER SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (WSDP) CONTRACT NO. ME-011/2016-2017/CONTR/C/05 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT FINAL CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR REVIEW AND UPDATE OF DOCUMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF WATER AND SANITATION SERVICES IN MOROGORO MUNICIPALITY JANUARY 2018 In Joint Venture with and The Republic of Tanzania Review and Update of Documents for Improvement of Ministry of Water and Irrigation Water Supply and Sanitation Services in Morogoro Municipality AFD Full EIA Report GENERAL INFORMATION Consultancy Services for Review and Update of Documents for Improvement of Project Water Supply and Sanitation Services in Morogoro Municipality Title of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report document Reference Contract No. ME-011/2016-2017/CONTR/C/05 Authors Seureca Veolia JV Seureca East Africa Ltd - NETWAS (T) Ltd Date January 2018 RECIPIENTS SENT TO Name / Position Institution Sent on Director of Urban Water Supply Ministry of Water and Irrigation January 2018 COPY TO Name / Position Institution Sent on Morogoro Urban Water Supply and Sanitation Managing Director January 2018 Authority (MORUWASA) Director General National Environment Management Council January 2018 VERSIONS Version Date Comments V2 January 2018 Environmental Impact Assessment Report January 2018 SEURECA Veolia JV Seureca East Africa Ltd & NETWAS (T) Ltd P a g e | i/viii The Republic of Tanzania Review and Update of Documents for Improvement of Ministry of Water and Irrigation Water Supply and Sanitation Services in Morogoro Municipality AFD Full EIA Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................. 10 2.3 OBJECTIVE OF AN ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT .................................................................... 11 2.4 OBJECTIVE OF THIS EIA ............................................................................................................. 12 2.5 THE STUDY METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................ 13 2.5.1 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................................... 13 2.5.2 PROJECT BOUNDARIES ....................................................................................................... 14 2.5.3 CONSIDERATION OF PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................... 15 2.5.4 STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT .............................................................................................. 15 2.5.5 IMPACT ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................... 15 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENT .................................................. 16 3.1 THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................. 16 3.2 NATURE OF THE PROJECT AND ITS COMPONENTS ........................................................................... 16 3.3 WATER SUPPLY SERVICES ............................................................................................................ 16 3.4 SEWERAGE AND WASTEWATER SERVICES ........................................................................................ 16 3.5 INCREASING CAPACITY OF MINDU DAM RESERVOIR .......................................................................... 17 3.6 MISSING ELEMENTS WHICH WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE DETAILED DESIGN .......................................... 18 3.7 PROJECT ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................................. 19 3.7.1 MOBILIZATION ................................................................................................................... 19 3.7.2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE ....................................................................................................... 19 3.7.3 OPERATION PHASE ............................................................................................................. 20 3.7.4 DECOMMISSIONING PHASE .................................................................................................... 20 3.8 SOURCE OF ENERGY ................................................................................................................... 21 3.9 WASTE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................. 21 3.9.1 SOLID WASTE GENERATION AND MANAGEMENT ........................................................................ 21 3.9.2 LIQUID WASTE ................................................................................................................... 21 3.10 MUNICIPAL WATER MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 22 4.0 POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 23 4.1 POLICY FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................. 23 4.1.1 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT POLICY (NEP, 1997) .................................................................... 23 4.1.2 NATIONAL WATER POLICY (NAWAPO) ................................................................................ 24 4.1.3 NATIONAL WATER SECTOR DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (NWSDS 2004) .................................... 25 4.1.4 NATIONAL HUMAN SETTLEMENTS DEVELOPMENT POLICY (2000) ............................................. 25 4.1.5 WATER SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (WSDP) ............................................................ 26 4.1.6 THE NATIONAL FIVE YEARS DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2016/17- 2020/21.................................... 27 4.1.7 THE TANZANIA DEVELOPMENT VISION 2025 ......................................................................... 28 January 2018 SEURECA Veolia JV Seureca East Africa Ltd & NETWAS (T) Ltd P a g e | ii/viii The Republic of Tanzania Review and Update of Documents for Improvement of Ministry of Water and Irrigation Water Supply and Sanitation Services in Morogoro Municipality AFD Full EIA Report 4.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................. 28 4.2.1 THE CONSTITUTION OF TANZANIA (1977) ............................................................................ 28 4.2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT NO 20 OF 2004 ............................................................ 29 4.2.3 THE WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT (2009) ............................................................... 30 4.2.4 WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION ACT NO. 12 OF 2009 ........................................................ 32 4.2.5 THE ENERGY AND WATER UTILITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY ACT (2001) .............................. 34 4.2.6 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT (URBAN AUTHORITY) ACT NO. 8 OF 1982 ...................................... 35 4.2.7 THE LAND USE PLANNING ACT OF 2007 .............................................................................. 35 4.2.8 THE URBAN PLANNING ACT, NO. 8 OF 2007 ....................................................................... 36 4.2.9 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT OF 2003 .............................................................. 36 4.2.10 EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS ACT OF 2004 ............................................................ 37 4.2.11 PUBLIC HEALTH ACT OF 2009 ............................................................................................ 37 4.2.12 THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND AUDIT REGULATIONS (2005) ........................... 38 4.2.13 STANDARDS GOVERNING WATER QUALITY IN TANZANIA .......................................................... 39 4.2.14 INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AGREEMENTS/TREATIES .......................................................... 41 4.2.15 INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION’S POLICY ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY (2012) 42 4.2.16 THE EQUATOR PRINCIPLES (EP) .......................................................................................... 42 4.3 INSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ......................................................................... 44 5.0 BASELINE/EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................. 45 5.1 LOCATION AND GEOGRAPHICAL SETTINGS ...................................................................................... 45 5.2 CLIMATE, SOIL AND TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................................ 46 5.2.1 GEOLOGY AND SOILS .......................................................................................................... 48 5.3 WATER SOURCES AND PRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 48 5.4 SANITATION CONDITIONS ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SAGCOT) Public Disclosure Authorized Investment Project
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE Public Disclosure Authorized Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT) Public Disclosure Authorized Investment Project SRATEGIC REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Public Disclosure Authorized AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT (SRESA) This SRESA report was prepared for the Government of Tanzania by Environmental Resources Management Limited (ERM) under a contract as part of SAGCOT preparatory activities Public Disclosure Authorized DECEMBER 2013 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 PROGRAMMEOVERVIEW 1 1.3 STUDY OBJECTIVE 2 1.4 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 3 1.5 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3 1.5.1 Overview 3 1.5.2 Screening 4 1.5.3 Scoping 4 1.5.4 Baseline Description 4 1.5.5 Scenario Development 4 1.5.6 Impact Assessment 5 1.5.7 Development of Mitigation Measures 5 1.5.8 Consultation 6 1.5.9 Constraints and Limitations 6 1.6 REPORT LAYOUT 6 2 THE SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL GROWTH CORRIDOR OF TANZANIA 8 2.1 THE SAGCOT PROGRAMME 8 2.1.1 The SAGCOT Concept 8 2.1.2 SAGCOT Organisation 11 2.2 PROPOSED WORLD BANK SUPPORTED SAGCOT INVESTMENT PROJECT 14 2.2.1 General 14 2.2.2 Catalytic Fund 15 2.2.3 Support Institutions 16 3 THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN TANZANIA 20 3.1 INTRODUCTION 20 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND THE TANZANIAN ECONOMY 20 3.2.1 Overview 20 3.2.2 Land Use 25 3.3 PRIORITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR 25 3.3.1 Current Initiatives for Agricultural Development 25 3.3.2 Rationale for SAGCOT Programme 29 3.3.3 District Level Agricultural Planning 30 3.4 FINANCING POLICIES
    [Show full text]
  • Mvomero District, Morogoro Region)
    January 2015 LOCAL EDUCATION SECTOR GOVERNANCE IN TANZANIA Mapping monitoring and evaluation actors, activities and use in two selected villages of Mzumbe ward (Mvomero District, Morogoro Region) Preliminary Findings Nathalie HOLVOET and Liesbeth INBERG Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp Elisabeth LULU and Yona MATEKERE Institute of Development Studies, Mzumbe University, Tanzania Table of Content 0. Preface 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Conceptual framework 8 3. Methodology 10 3.1. Data collection 10 3.2. Data selection and location 11 3.3. Limitations 12 4. Bio-physical conditions 13 4.1. Inputs to the education sector 13 4.2. Education activities and outputs 16 4.2.1. Morogoro Region 17 4.2.2. Mvomero District 19 4.2.3. Changarawe and Vikenge 19 5. Rules in use 26 5.1. Rules in use (formal) 26 5.1.1. Decentralisation 26 5.1.2. Open Government Partnership and Big Results Now 27 5.1.3. Education 27 5.2. Rules in use (informal) 29 6. Community attributes 30 6.1. Political context 30 6.2. Governance context 31 6.3. Socio-economic context 32 6.4. Cultural context 35 6.5. Religion 37 7. Into the action arena: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) actors, activities and outputs 39 7.1. Schools 39 7.1.1. Primary schools 39 7.1.2. Secondary schools 40 7.2. District level actors 41 7.2.1. General 41 7.2.2. Education-specific actors 44 7.3. Village level actors 45 7.3.1. Village Council, Village education committees, Village General Assembly 45 7.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Morogoro Report.Pdf
    United Republic of Tanzania NATIONAL SAMPLE CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE 2002/2003 Volume Ve: REGIONAL REPORT: NationalTanzania Bureau Agriculture of Statistics, Sample Ministry Census of Agriculture and Food Security, Ministry of Water and Livestock Development, Ministry of Cooperatives and Marketing, Presidents Office, Regional Administration and Local Government December 2007 United Republic of Tanzania NATIONAL SAMPLE CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE 2002/2003 VOLUME Ve: REGIONAL REPORT: MOROGORO REGION National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of agriculture and Food Security, Ministry of Water and Livestock Development, Ministry of Cooperatives and Marketing, Presidents Office, Regional Administration and Local Government, Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs – Zanzibar December 2007 TOC i ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents.......................................................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................................................................... v Preface........................................................................................................................................................................................-vi Executive summary....................................................................................................................................................................xii
    [Show full text]
  • Soil and Land Resources of Morogoro Urban District
    SOILS AND LAND RESOURCES OF MOROGORO RURAL AND URBAN DISTRICTS ISBN 9987 605 29 X VOLUME 4 LAND RESOURCES INVENTORY AND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR THE MAJOR LAND USE TYPES IN MOROGORO URBAN DISTRICT, TANZANIA Balthazar M. Msanya Didas N. Kimaro Gerald G. Kimbi Emmanuel P. Kileo Joseph J.D.J. Mbogoni 2001 Department of Soil Science Faculty of Agriculture Sokoine University of Agriculture P.O. Box 3008 Morogoro, Tanzania ii Correct Citation: Msanya, B.M., Kimaro, D.N., Kimbi, G.G, Kileo, E.P. and Mbogoni, J.D.J. (2001). Land resources inventory and suitability assessment for the major land use types in Morogoro Urban District, Tanzania. Soils and Land Resources of Morogoro Rural and Urban Districts, Volume 4. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania “No part of this report may be reproduced, stored in a retrievable system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of the author or Sokoine University of Agriculture in that behalf” Published by: Department of Soil Science Sokoine University of Agriculture P.O. Box 3008 CHUO KIKUU MOROGORO, TANZANIA Phone +255 23 2603999 Fax +255 23 2603259 E-mail: [email protected] 2001 ISBN 9987 605 29 X Type setting, cover and graphic design by the authors Msanya et al. iii PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is a semi-detailed explanatory report for the soil map of Morogoro Urban District, Tanzania at a scale of 1:50,000. It contains information that can be used for general land use planning activities in the area, particularly for the production of the major crops (maize, rice, sorghum, beans, banana and vegetables).
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Agricultural Information for Women Farmers in Hai and Kilosa Districts, Tanzania THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfill
    Sources of Agricultural Information for Women Farmers in Hai and Kilosa Districts, Tanzania THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Elizabeth Lucas Isaya, B.S. Graduate Program in Agricultural and Extension Education The Ohio State University 2015 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Robert Agunga, Advisor Dr. Robert J. Birkenholz Copyright by Elizabeth Lucas Isaya 2015 ABSTRACT This study investigated sources of agricultural information used by women farmers in Tanzania. Women farmers constitute the majority of farmers in Tanzania. Enabling them to increase food production will help achieve the government’s goals of achieving food security and agro-based industrialization. However, it is not clear where women farmers obtain information on modern farming methods. Knowing these sources will enable the Tanzanian government and international aid organizations channel information directed toward women farmers through those sources. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify women farmer’s sources of information in agriculture. Due to limited funding and time constraints, the study involved a survey of 300 women farmers in Hai and Kilosa districts of Kilimanjaro and Morogoro Regions, respectively. The survey was completed using an interview schedule. Of the 300 respondents sampled, 288 provided usable data for the study yielding a response rate of 96%. Six research objectives guided this study, namely: (a) examine the demographic characteristics of women farmers in Tanzania; (b) describe sources of information on modern farming methods for women farmers; (c) assess innovative farming methods adopted by women farmers; (d) examine women farmers’ access to and use of ICTs; (e) examine women farmers’ access to and use of agricultural extension agents; and (f) examine other challenges facing women farmers in Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusive Breast-Feeding Is Rarely Practised in Rural and Urban Morogoro, Tanzania
    Public Health Nutrition: 4(2), 147±154 DOI: 10.1079/PHN200057 Exclusive breast-feeding is rarely practised in rural and urban Morogoro, Tanzania Restituta Shirima1, Ted Greiner2, Elisabeth Kylberg2 and Mehari Gebre-Medhin2,* 1Tanzania Food and Nutrition Centre, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: 2Section for International Maternal and Children's Health, University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden Submitted 19 October 1999: Accepted 6 June 2000 Abstract Objective: To investigate and compare feeding practices among infants of less than 7 months of age in a rural and an urban area in Tanzania. Design: Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based interview of mothers and focus group discussions with extension workers and community leaders. Setting: Eleven villages in a rural district and 10 wards in an urban district in the Morogoro region, Tanzania, west of Dar es Salaam. Subjects: Probability samples of mothers with infants of less than 7 months of age n 320 from each area). Results: Exclusive breast-feeding was rarely practised in either the rural or urban areas investigated. However, the urban mothers initiated breast-feeding earlier, discarded colostrum less frequently, breast-fed exclusively for a longer period, gave breast milk as the first feed more often and delayed the introduction of solid foods Keywords for longer than their rural counterparts. The rural mothers, on the other hand, breast- Breast-feeding fed their previous infants slightly longer than the urban mothers. Exclusive breast-feeding Conclusions: The better performance of urban mothers could be partly due to Infant feeding sustained breast-feeding support in hospital settings and other campaigns which may Colostrum Complementation not have reached the rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Morogoro Region Socio-Economic Profile
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA MOROGORO REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE UGANDA RWANDA KENYA BURUNDI MOROGORO ZAMBIA MSUMBIJI Joint Publication by: THE PLANNING COMMISSION DAR ES SALAAM and REGIONAL COMMISSIONER'S OFFICE MOROGORO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD............................................................................................v SECTION I..............................................................................................1 1.0 LAND, PEOPLE AND CLIMATE ...................................................1 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION:..................................................................1 1.2 LAND AREA :........................................................................................1 1.3 ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS ......................................................................2 1.4 ETHNIC GROUPS:..................................................................................2 1.5 POPULATION SIZE, GROWTH AND DENSITY..........................................3 1.6 MIGRATION:....................................................................................... 19 1.7 EMPLOYMENT:................................................................................... 22 1.8 CLIMATE:........................................................................................... 27 1.9 AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES:................................................................. 27 SECTION II ..........................................................................................29 REGIONAL ECONOMY......................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Information Needs and Information Sources of Urban and Peri-Urban Livestock Keepers in Kinondoni and Morogoro Urban Districts, Tanzania
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2016 Assessing the Information Needs and Information Sources of Urban and Peri-urban Livestock Keepers in Kinondoni and Morogoro Urban Districts, Tanzania. Consolata Angello 1 Sokoine University of Agriculture, [email protected] Jangawe Msuya 2 University of Dar es Salaam, [email protected] Doris Matovelo 3 Sokoine University of Agriculture, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Angello, Consolata 1; Msuya, Jangawe 2; and Matovelo, Doris 3, "Assessing the Information Needs and Information Sources of Urban and Peri-urban Livestock Keepers in Kinondoni and Morogoro Urban Districts, Tanzania." (2016). Library Philosophy and Practice (e- journal). 1363. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1363 Assessing the information needs and information sources of urban and peri-urban livestock keepers in Kinondoni and Morogoro Urban Districts, Tanzania. Consolata Angello¹, Jangawe Msuya² and Doris Matovelo³ ¹Sokoine University of Agriculture, Department of Informatics, Morogoro, Tanzania. ²University of Dar es Salaam, Department of Information Studies, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. ³Sokoine National Agricultural Library, Morogoro, Tanzania, Corresponding author: Author 1, E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper discusses the information needs of urban and peri-urban livestock keepers and the various information sources used and their effectiveness in disseminating livestock information. Mixed method approach was the methodology used in the study whereby quantitative data was gathered using questionnaires while qualitative data was gathered using in-depth interviews and participant observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Information Needs and Information Sources of Urban and Peri-Urban Livestock Keepers in Kinondoni and Morogoro Urban Districts, Tanzania
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2016 Assessing the Information Needs and Information Sources of Urban and Peri-urban Livestock Keepers in Kinondoni and Morogoro Urban Districts, Tanzania. Consolata Angello 1 Sokoine University of Agriculture, [email protected] Jangawe Msuya 2 University of Dar es Salaam, [email protected] Doris Matovelo 3 Sokoine University of Agriculture, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Angello, Consolata 1; Msuya, Jangawe 2; and Matovelo, Doris 3, "Assessing the Information Needs and Information Sources of Urban and Peri-urban Livestock Keepers in Kinondoni and Morogoro Urban Districts, Tanzania." (2016). Library Philosophy and Practice (e- journal). 1363. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1363 Assessing the information needs and information sources of urban and peri-urban livestock keepers in Kinondoni and Morogoro Urban Districts, Tanzania. Consolata Angello¹, Jangawe Msuya² and Doris Matovelo³ ¹Sokoine University of Agriculture, Department of Informatics, Morogoro, Tanzania. ²University of Dar es Salaam, Department of Information Studies, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. ³Sokoine National Agricultural Library, Morogoro, Tanzania, Corresponding author: Author 1, E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper discusses the information needs of urban and peri-urban livestock keepers and the various information sources used and their effectiveness in disseminating livestock information. Mixed method approach was the methodology used in the study whereby quantitative data was gathered using questionnaires while qualitative data was gathered using in-depth interviews and participant observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatio-Temporal Prevalence of Malaria and Anaemia in Relation to Agro-Ecosystems in Mvomero District, Tanzania
    Rumisha et al. Malar J (2019) 18:228 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2859-y Malaria Journal RESEARCH Open Access Spatio-temporal prevalence of malaria and anaemia in relation to agro-ecosystems in Mvomero district, Tanzania Susan F. Rumisha1* , Elizabeth H. Shayo1 and Leonard E. G. Mboera1,2 Abstract Background: Agro-ecological systems have been associated with increased malaria intensity. This study determined association between diferent agro-ecological systems, prevalence of malaria parasitaemia and anaemia in Mvomero district, Tanzania. Methods: The study was carried out in three agro-ecosystems namely, savannah, rice-irrigation, and sugarcane. Malaria and anaemia prevalence were measured in four seasons of a year. Villages were categorized according to envi- ronmental characteristics, proportion of water-shaded areas and agro-ecosystems. Mixed-efects logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with malaria infection. Results: A total of 7888 individuals were involved with the overall malaria prevalence of 34.4%. Plasmodium falcipa- rum was the dominant (99.52%) malaria species. Malaria prevalence was highest (42.9%) in children of 10–15 years of age, and signifcantly low during dry and hot season. Of the infected individuals, 78.1% were from rice-irrigation, 18.7% savannah and 3.2% sugarcane ecosystem. Individuals living in villages with high levels of water-shaded areas had highest malaria risk. Over three-quarters (78.9%) of the individuals slept under a mosquito net, with the highest (88.5%) coverage among individuals in sugarcane ecosystem. On average 47.1% of the children were anaemic. Anae- mia was more prevalent (60.5%) among individuals in the savannah than in the rice-irrigation (48.2%) or sugarcane communities (23%).
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Modelling for Economic Valuation of the Role of Forests and Woodlands in Drinking Water Provision to Two African Cities T
    Ecosystem Services 32 (2018) 50–61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ecosystem Services journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoser Integrated modelling for economic valuation of the role of forests and woodlands in drinking water provision to two African cities T Biniam B. Ashagrea, Philip J. Plattsb,c, Marco Njanad, Neil D. Burgesse,f, Andrew Balmfordg, ⁎ R. Kerry Turnerh, Marije Schaafsmai, a Centre for Water Systems, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK b Environment Department, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NG, UK c Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK d National Carbon Monitoring Centre, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania e UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), Cambridge CB3 0DL, UK f CMEC, The Natural History Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark g Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK h School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK i Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Rapidly growing economies often have high population growth, resulting in agricultural expansion in rural areas Ecosystem services and increased water demand in urban areas. Conversion of forests and woodlands to agriculture may threaten SWAT safe and reliable water supply in cities. This study assesses the regulating functions and economic values of Tanzania forests and woodlands in meeting the water needs of two major cities in Tanzania and proposes an integrated Soil erosion modelling approach with a scenario-based analysis to estimate costs of water supply avoided by forest con- Urban water demand servation.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 1St TAFORI Scientific Conference on Forestry Research for Sustainable Industrial Economy in Tanzania
    Proceedings of the 1st TAFORI Scientific Conference on Forestry Research for Sustainable Industrial Economy in Tanzania October, 2018 Editors J.F. Kessy, C.P. Balama, P.J. Kagosi, S. Bakengesa, N.E. Pima, M.A. Mndolwa and S.E. Nkya Proceedings of the 1st TAFORI Scientific Conference on Forestry Research for Sustainable Industrial Economy in Tanzania Held at TAFORI Headquarters, Morogoro, Tanzania 24th - 25th April 2018 Editors J.F. Kessy, C.P. Balama, P.J. Kagosi, S. Bakengesa, N.E. Pima, M.A. Mndolwa and S.E. Nkya Organised by the Tanzania Forestry Research Institute (TAFORI) and Tanzania Forest Fund (TaFF) Financially Supported by: Tanzania Forest Fund (TaFF) of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism (MNRT) Tanzania Forestry Research Institute (TAFORI), Dar es Salaam – Morogoro Highway, P.O. Box 1854, Morogoro, Tanzania. Tel: +255 23 260 4532/4498/3725; Fax: +255 23 260 3725; E- mail: [email protected]; Website: www.tafori.or.tz REMARKS FROM THE BOARD CHAIRMAN For over 50 years of independence, Tanzania has made attempts of advancing in science and technology. However, the outcomes of these attempts in research and development in forestry have remained relatively low which can partly be attributed to inadequate capacity especially on financial resource for research. Experiences in developed countries indicate that expenditures in research are high, unlike in developing countries where expenditures in research are still low. For the past decade however the importance of forestry research as an important prerequisite for advancing forestry and beekeeping sub-sectors in the country has gained recognition of policy and decision makers at all levels.
    [Show full text]