DOCSLIB.ORG

Characterization of the Enzymes Involved in the Glutathione Synthesis and the Redox Enzyme Glutathione Reductase in Caenorhabditis Elegans (Maupas, 1900)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Characterization of the Enzymes Involved in the Glutathione Synthesis and the Redox Enzyme Glutathione Reductase in Caenorhabditis Elegans (Maupas, 1900) Characterization of the enzymes involved in the glutathione synthesis and the redox enzyme glutathione reductase in Caenorhabditis elegans (Maupas, 1900) Dissertation Submitted for the attainment of a doctoral degree from the Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Natural Sciences of the University of Hamburg, Germany by Caroline Enjuakwei Ajonina Buzie (Bamenda, Cameroon) Hamburg 2006 Gedruckt mit Unterstützung des Deutschen Akademischen Austauschdienstes (DAAD) Table of contents Table of contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 1.1 Nematodes ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Pathogenesis and host- parasite relationship ................................................................. 1 1.1.2 Caenorhabditis elegans ...................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2.1 Classification .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1.2.2 Life cycle of C. elegans ................................................................................................. 3 1.1.2.3 C. elegans as a model system .................................................................................... 4 1.2 Microinjection in C. elegans ................................................................................................... 5 1.3 RNA interference in C. elegans ............................................................................................. 5 1.3.1 Mechanism of RNA interference ....................................................................................... 6 1.4 Oxidative stress and its effect to the cell .............................................................................. 7 1.4.1 Sources of reactive oxygen species. ................................................................................ 9 1.4.2 The effect of reactive oxygen species in biological systems........................................ 9 1.5 Glutathione ............................................................................................................................. 10 1.5.1 Glutathione biosynthesis, metabolism, and utilization ................................................. 11 1.6 Enzymes of the GSH synthesis ........................................................................................... 17 1.6.1 γ-Glutamylcysteine synthetase ........................................................................................ 17 1.6.2 Glutathione synthetase ..................................................................................................... 20 1.6.3 Glutathione reductase ...................................................................................................... 22 1.7 Research objectives .............................................................................................................. 24 CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS .............................................................. 26 2.1 Chemicals and Bioreagents ................................................................................................. 26 2.2 Standard Solutions and Buffers ........................................................................................... 29 2.2.1 Media .............................................................................................................................. 31 2.3 Vectors and bacterial cells ................................................................................................... 31 2.3.1 Plasmid vectors ................................................................................................................. 31 Table of contents 2.3.2 Escherichia coli strains ..................................................................................................... 32 2.3.3 C. elegans strains .............................................................................................................. 32 2.4 Culture of C. elegans ............................................................................................................ 32 2.4.1 Growth conditions .............................................................................................................. 32 2.4.2 Separation of C. elegans from bacteria ......................................................................... 33 2.4.3 Axenic C. elegans culture ................................................................................................ 33 2.4.4 Freezing of worms ............................................................................................................. 33 2.5 Photometric determination of GSH concentration in C. elegans .................................... 34 2.6 Preparation of nucleic acids ................................................................................................. 35 2.6.1 Preparation of genomic DNA ........................................................................................... 35 2.6.2 Preparation of RNA from C. elegans .............................................................................. 36 2.6.3 Ethanol precipitation ......................................................................................................... 36 2.6.5 Phenol-chloroform extraction .......................................................................................... 36 2.7 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ....................................................................................... 37 2.7.1 Single worm PCR .............................................................................................................. 37 2.8 Reverse transcription ............................................................................................................ 37 2.9 Preparations of plasmid DNA .............................................................................................. 38 2.9.1 Mini preparation of plasmid DNA .................................................................................... 38 2.9.2 Midi and Maxi preparation of plasmid DNA ................................................................... 38 2.11 Agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA .................................................................................. 39 2.12 Recovery of DNA from agarose gels .................................................................................. 39 2.13 Ligation of DNA fragments sub-cloning in plasmid vectors ............................................. 39 2.14 Transformation ....................................................................................................................... 40 2.14.1 Competent bacteria production ....................................................................................... 40 2.14.2 Transformation of competent cells ................................................................................. 40 2.15 DNA sequencing and in silico analyses ............................................................................. 41 2.16 Recombinant expression of C. elegans GS ( Ce GS) ...................................................... 41 2.16.1 Cloning of Ce GS ............................................................................................................... 41 2.16.2 Induction of protein expression ....................................................................................... 42 2.16.3 Purification of re Ce GS ...................................................................................................... 42 Table of contents 2.16.4 Enzyme assay and kinetic analyses of recombinant Ce GS ....................................... 43 2.17 Recombinant expression of C. elegans GR ( Ce GR) ....................................................... 43 2.17.1 Cloning of Ce GR ............................................................................................................... 43 2.17.2 Induction of protein expression. ...................................................................................... 44 2.17.3 Purification of r Ce GR ........................................................................................................ 44 2.17.4 Kinetic analysis of Ce GR protein .................................................................................... 45 2.18 Recombinant expression of C. elegans γ-GCS ( Ce GCS) ................................................. 45 2.18.1 Cloning of Ce GCS ............................................................................................................ 45 2.18.2 Recombinant expression of Ce GCS .............................................................................. 45 2.19 Protein determination methods ............................................................................................ 47 2.19.1 Determination of protein concentration .......................................................................... 47 2.19.2 SDS-PAGE under denaturing conditions ...................................................................... 47 2.19.3 Protein staining gels ......................................................................................................... 48 2.19.3.1 Coomassie blue staining ........................................................................................... 48 2.19.3.2 Silver staining .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of the Internal and External Parasites of Deer
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE INDEX-CATALOGUE OF MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ZOOLOGY SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 1 CHECKLIST OF THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL PARASITES OF DEER, ODOCOILEUS HEMION4JS AND 0. VIRGINIANUS, IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE INDEX-CATALOGUE OF MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ZOOLOGY SPECIAL PUBLICATION NO. 1 CHECKLIST OF THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL PARASITES OF DEER, ODOCOILEUS HEMIONOS AND O. VIRGIN I ANUS, IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA By MARTHA L. WALKER, Zoologist and WILLARD W. BECKLUND, Zoologist National Animal Parasite Laboratory VETERINARY SCIENCES RESEARCH DIVISION AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE Issued September 1970 U. S. Government Printing Office Washington : 1970 The protozoan, helminth, and arthropod parasites of deer, Odocoileus hemionus and O. virginianus, of the continental United States and Canada are named in a checklist with information categorized by scientific name, deer host, geographic distribution by State or Province, and authority for each record. Sources of information are the files of the Index-Catalogue of Medical and Veterinary Zoology, the National Parasite Collection, and pub- lished papers. Three hundred and fifty-two references are cited. Seventy- nine genera of parasites have been reported from North American deer, of which 73 have been assigned one or more specific names representing 137 species (10 protozoans, 6 trematodes, 11 cestodes, 51 nematodes, and 59 arthropods). Sixty-one of these species are also known to occur as parasites of domestic sheep and 54 as parasites of cattle. The 71 parasites that the authors have examined from deer are marked with an asterisk. This paper is designed as a working tool for wildlife and animal disease workers to quickly find references pertinent to a particular parasite species, its deer hosts, and its geographic distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening of Mosquitoes for Filarioid Helminths in Urban Areas in South Western Poland—Common Patterns in European Setaria Tundra Xenomonitoring Studies
    Parasitology Research (2019) 118:127–138 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6134-x ARTHROPODS AND MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY - ORIGINAL PAPER Screening of mosquitoes for filarioid helminths in urban areas in south western Poland—common patterns in European Setaria tundra xenomonitoring studies Katarzyna Rydzanicz1 & Elzbieta Golab2 & Wioletta Rozej-Bielicka2 & Aleksander Masny3 Received: 22 March 2018 /Accepted: 28 October 2018 /Published online: 8 December 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract In recent years, numerous studies screening mosquitoes for filarioid helminths (xenomonitoring) have been performed in Europe. The entomological monitoring of filarial nematode infections in mosquitoes by molecular xenomonitoring might serve as the measure of the rate at which humans and animals expose mosquitoes to microfilariae and the rate at which animals and humans are exposed to the bites of the infected mosquitoes. We hypothesized that combining the data obtained from molecular xenomonitoring and phenological studies of mosquitoes in the urban environment would provide insights into the transmission risk of filarial diseases. In our search for Dirofilaria spp.-infected mosquitoes, we have found Setaria tundra-infected ones instead, as in many other European studies. We have observed that cross-reactivity in PCR assays for Dirofilaria repens, Dirofilaria immitis,andS. tundra COI gene detection was the rule rather than the exception. S. tundra infections were mainly found in Aedes mosquitoes. The differences in the diurnal rhythm of Aedes and Culex mosquitoes did not seem a likely explanation for the lack of S. tundra infections in Culex mosquitoes. The similarity of S. tundra COI gene sequences found in Aedes vexans and Aedes caspius mosquitoes and in roe deer in many European studies, supported by data on Ae.
    [Show full text]
  • (<I>Alces Alces</I>) of North America
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2015 Epidemiology of select species of filarial nematodes in free- ranging moose (Alces alces) of North America Caroline Mae Grunenwald University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Animal Diseases Commons, Other Microbiology Commons, and the Veterinary Microbiology and Immunobiology Commons Recommended Citation Grunenwald, Caroline Mae, "Epidemiology of select species of filarial nematodes in free-ranging moose (Alces alces) of North America. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2015. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3582 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Caroline Mae Grunenwald entitled "Epidemiology of select species of filarial nematodes in free-ranging moose (Alces alces) of North America." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Microbiology. Chunlei Su,
    [Show full text]
  • First Report of Setaria Tundra in Roe Deer
    Angelone-Alasaad et al. Parasites & Vectors (2016) 9:521 DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1793-x SHORTREPORT Open Access First report of Setaria tundra in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) from the Iberian Peninsula inferred from molecular data: epidemiological implications Samer Angelone-Alasaad1,2*† , Michael J. Jowers3,4†, Rosario Panadero5, Ana Pérez-Creo5, Gerardo Pajares5, Pablo Díez-Baños5, Ramón C. Soriguer1 and Patrocinio Morrondo5 Abstract Background: Filarioid nematode parasites are major health hazards with important medical, veterinary and economic implications. Recently, they have been considered as indicators of climate change. Findings: In this paper, we report the first record of Setaria tundra in roe deer from the Iberian Peninsula. Adult S. tundra were collected from the peritoneal cavity during the post-mortem examination of a 2 year-old male roe deer, which belonged to a private fenced estate in La Alcarria (Guadalajara, Spain). Since 2012, the area has suffered a high roe deer decline rate (75 %), for unknown reasons. Aiming to support the morphological identification and to determine the phylogenetic position of S. tundra recovered from the roe deer, a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1) gene from the two morphologically identified parasites was amplified, sequenced and compared with corresponding sequences of other filarioid nematode species. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that the isolate of S. tundra recovered was basal to all other formely reported Setaria tundra sequences. The presence of all other haplotypes in Northern Europe may be indicative of a South to North outbreak in Europe. Conclusions: This is the first report of S. tundra in roe deer from the Iberian Peninsula, with interesting phylogenetic results, which may have further implications in the epidemiological and genetic studies of these filarioid parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Journal of Medical Research: G Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine
    Online ISSN : 2249-4618 Print ISSN : 0975-5888 DOI : 10.17406/GJMRA NavicularBoneofHorses MajorTransboundaryDisease ControllingGastro-Intestinal PercollDensityCentrifugation VOLUME17ISSUE2VERSION1.0 Global Journal of Medical Research: G Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine Global Journal of Medical Research: G Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine Volume 17 Issue 2 (Ver. 1.0) Open Association of Research Society Global Journals Inc. © Global Journal of Medical (A Delaware USA Incorporation with “Good Standing”; Reg. Number: 0423089) Sponsors:Open Association of Research Society Research. 2017. Open Scientific Standards All rights reserved. Publisher’s Headquarters office This is a special issue published in version 1.0 of “Global Journal of Medical Research.” By ® Global Journals Inc. Global Journals Headquarters 945th Concord Streets, All articles are open access articles distributed under “Global Journal of Medical Research” Framingham Massachusetts Pin: 01701, United States of America Reading License, which permits restricted use. Entire contents are copyright by of “Global USA Toll Free: +001-888-839-7392 Journal of Medical Research” unless USA Toll Free Fax: +001-888-839-7392 otherwise noted on specific articles. Offset Typesetting No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including Global Journals Incorporated photocopy, recording, or any information 2nd, Lansdowne, Lansdowne Rd., Croydon-Surrey, storage and retrieval system, without written permission. Pin: CR9 2ER, United Kingdom The opinions and statements made in this Packaging & Continental Dispatching book are those of the authors concerned. Ultraculture has not verified and neither confirms nor denies any of the foregoing and Global Journals Pvt Ltd no warranty or fitness is implied.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitas De Bovinos
    PARASITAS DE BOVINOS ENDOPARASITAS ■ Parasitas do sistema digestório ESÔFAGO Gongylonema pulchrum Sinônimo. G. scutatum. Nome comum. Verme do esôfago. Locais de predileção. Esôfago, rúmen. Filo. Nematoda. Classe. Secernentea. Superfamília. Spiruroidea. Descrição macroscópica. Um verme longo, delgado, esbranquiçado, os machos têm, aproximadamente, 5 cm e as fêmeas até, aproximadamente, 14 cm de comprimento. Descrição microscópica. Os vermes são facilmente distinguidos microscopicamente pela presença de fileiras longitudinais de projeções cuticulares na região anterior do corpo. As asas cervicais são assimétricas e proeminentes. Os ovos têm casca grossa e possuem dois opérculos. Eles medem 50-70 × 25-37 μm e contêm L1 quando eliminados nas fezes. Hospedeiros definitivos. Ovinos, caprinos, bovinos, suínos, búfalos, equinos, jumentos, veados, camelos, humanos. Hospedeiros intermediários. Besouros coprófagos, baratas. Distribuição geográfica. Provavelmente cosmopolita. Para mais detalhes veja o Capítulo 9 (Ovinos e caprinos). Hypoderma bovis Para mais detalhes veja Parasitas do tegumento. Hypoderma lineatum Para mais detalhes veja Parasitas do tegumento. RÚMEN E RETÍCULO Gongylonema verrucosum Nome comum. Verme do esôfago e do rúmen. Locais de predileção. Rúmen, retículo, omaso. Filo. Nematoda. Classe. Secernentea. Superfamília. Spiruroidea. Descrição macroscópica. Vermes longos, delgados, avermelhados quando estão frescos. Os machos têm, aproximadamente, 3,5 cm e as fêmeas, 7,0 a 9,5 cm de comprimento. Descrição microscópica. Os endoparasitas adultos apresentam asas cervicais festonadas e projeções cuticulares apenas do lado esquerdo do corpo. As espículas dos machos apresentam comprimento desigual, com a espícula esquerda mais longa que a direita. Hospedeiros definitivos. Bovinos, ovinos, caprinos, veados, zebu. Hospedeiros intermediários. Besouros coprófagos e baratas. Distribuição geográfica. Índia, África do Sul, EUA. Patogênese. Normalmente é considerado como não patogênico.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Study of Lymphatic Filarial Parasites Through Amplification of ITS2 Region of Ribosomal RNA Cistron
    Kamalambigeswari R et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol. 9(12), 2017, 2604-2608 Evolutionary Study of Lymphatic Filarial Parasites through Amplification of ITS2 Region of Ribosomal RNA Cistron Kamalambigeswari R1*, Jeyanthi Rebecca L2, Sharmila S3, Kowsalya E4. Department of Industrial Biotechnology, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India. Abstract The present study was primarily aimed at the amplification of Internal transcribed Spacer (ITS), region of the filarial parasites and to depict the evolutionary significance of various nematodes that causes lymphatic filariasis. Lymphatic filariasis has been targeted by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be eliminated by the year 2020. Filarial nematode parasites are a serious cause of morbidity in humans and animals. The ITS along with the flanking 18S and 5.8S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) were amplified from the isolated DNA of Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi, and Setaria cervi which was found to be ~1200bp.The amplification of ITS2 region of these filarial parasites illustrated that it is of ~600bp. The ITS2 region was sequenced and the nucleotide sequences homology was studied using BLAST. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using UPGMA Key words: Lymphatic filariasis, Nematodes, ITS sequences, Phylogenetic analysis INTRODUCTION Cytoplasmic rRNA genes are highly repetitive because Helminthic parasites cause several diseases such as of huge demand of ribosomes for protein synthesis ('gene filariasis, onchocerciasis, dracunculiasis and dosage') in the cell. Within the tandemnly repeated rRNA schistosomiasis. Filariasis is a group of human and animal gene complex coding sequences for small (18S) and large infectious disease caused by nematode parasites of the (5.8S+28S) subunit rRNA components are flanked by non- order filariadae containing three important families, transcribed and internal transcribed spacer region (ITS).
    [Show full text]
  • Põdra (Alces Alces) Endoparasiidid Euroopas
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace at Tartu University Library TARTU ÜLIKOOL ÖKOLOOGIA JA MAATEADUSTE INSTITUUT ZOOLOOGIA OSAKOND TERIOLOOGIA ÕPPETOOL Kristel Ceccill Veerme PÕDRA (ALCES ALCES) ENDOPARASIIDID EUROOPAS Balaureusetöö bioloogias (12 EAP) Juhendaja: Harri Valdmann, PhD Kaasjuhendaja: Epp Moks, PhD Tartu 2018 2 Infoleht Põdra (Alces alces) endoparasiidid Euroopas Põder (Alces alces) on Euroopa suurim hirvlane. Põtradel esineb palju siseparasiite, sealhulgas ümarusse (Nematoda), imiusse (Trematoda), paelusse (Cestoda) ja algloomi ehk ainurakseid (Protozoa). Nakkused on tihi intensiivsed. Põtrade parasitofauna kattub mõneti kariloomade omaga, mis tähendab, et osad parasiidid kanduvad edasi nii kodu- kui ka metsloomade tsüklis. Seetõttu on põdrad ja kariloomad kohati üksteisele vastastikku ohtlikud, sest võivad teisele osapoolele edasi kanda uusi parasitoose. Tööst järeldub, et seoses kliima soojenemise ning loomade globaalse transpordiga võivad Eesti aladele levida uued parasiidiliigid, kes ohustavad lisaks ulukhirvlastele ka põllumajanduslikult olulisi kariloomi. Märksõnad: põder, Alces alces, hirvlased, endoparasiidid, nematoodid, trematoodid, tsestoodid, algloomad CERCS: B320 süstemaatiline botaanika, zooloogia, zoogeograafia Moose (Alces alces) endoparasites in Europe Moose (Alces alces) is the biggest member of the cervid family (Cervidae) in Europe. Moose are hosts for a large number of endoparasites, including nematodes (Nematoda), trematodes (Trematoda), cestodes (Cestoda) and protozoans (Protozoa). Infections can occur in extremely high intensities. The parasite fauna of moose may overlap with that one of livestock which means some parasites are transmitted by both wild and domestic cycles. This current work concludes that there is potential of introduction of new parasite species to Estonia due to global warming and international transport of livestock. Those parasite species will not only be dangerous to moose, but to economically significant livestock as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Setaria Equina in Donkeys Mona Mohammed I
    Abdel Rahman Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences Beni-Suef University Journal of (2020) 9:17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-020-00046-y Basic and Applied Sciences RESEARCH Open Access Morphological and molecular characterization of Setaria equina in donkeys Mona Mohammed I. Abdel Rahman Abstract Background: Adult worms of Setaria equina mainly found in the peritoneal cavity of equine. They were nonpathogenic but might induce varied degrees of peritonitis and might migrate to the eye, brain, lung, and scrotum causing lacrimation, blindness, paraplegia, locomotor, and neurological disturbances. Identification by light microscopy is insufficient to differentiate Setaria species, and so scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is required to observe their ultrastructures. The study was performed on 80 donkeys from May 2018 to January 2019 for the detection of microfilaria in blood and the adult worms in the peritoneal cavity. The blood samples were either stained with Giemsa stain or examined by modified Knott’s technique for the detection of microfilariae. Adult worms were morphologically characterized based on light microscope and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). PCR was performed targeting the 12S rRNA gene followed by sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Results: The current study recorded 21.6% and 16.2% prevalence rates for adult worms and microfilariae, respectively. By using SEM, this study was able to clarify the detailed structure of amphids, predeirids, vulva, arrangement, and number of male caudal papillae. PCR amplified products for 12S rRNA gene (408 bp) for adult worm and microfilaria. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis revealed that S. equina isolated in the current study from donkeys in Egypt (accession no., MH345965) shared 100% identity with isolates from horse and man in Italy and Iran, respectively and clustered in the same clade with S.
    [Show full text]
  • Instituto De Biociências Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Biologia Animal Leonardo Tresoldi Gonçalves Dna Barcoding Em Nematoda
    INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA ANIMAL LEONARDO TRESOLDI GONÇALVES DNA BARCODING EM NEMATODA: UMA ANÁLISE EXPLORATÓRIA UTILIZANDO SEQUÊNCIAS DE cox1 DEPOSITADAS EM BANCOS DE DADOS PORTO ALEGRE 2019 LEONARDO TRESOLDI GONÇALVES DNA BARCODING EM NEMATODA: UMA ANÁLISE EXPLORATÓRIA UTILIZANDO SEQUÊNCIAS DE cox1 DEPOSITADAS EM BANCOS DE DADOS Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biociências da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, como requisito parcial à obtenção do título de Mestre em Biologia Animal. Área de concentração: Biologia Comparada Orientadora: Prof.ª Dr.ª Cláudia Calegaro-Marques Coorientadora: Prof.ª Dr.ª Maríndia Deprá PORTO ALEGRE 2019 LEONARDO TRESOLDI GONÇALVES DNA BARCODING EM NEMATODA: UMA ANÁLISE EXPLORATÓRIA UTILIZANDO SEQUÊNCIAS DE cox1 DEPOSITADAS EM BANCOS DE DADOS Aprovada em ____ de _________________ de 2019. BANCA EXAMINADORA ____________________________________________________ Dr.ª Eliane Fraga da Silveira (ULBRA) ____________________________________________________ Dr. Filipe Michels Bianchi (UFRGS) ____________________________________________________ Dr.ª Juliana Cordeiro (UFPel) i AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço a todos que, de uma forma ou de outra, estiveram comigo durante a trajetória deste mestrado. Este trabalho também é de vocês. Às minhas orientadoras, Cláudia Calegaro-Marques e Maríndia Deprá, por confiarem no meu trabalho, por fortalecerem minha autonomia, pelos conselhos e por todo o incentivo. Obrigado por aceitarem fazer parte desta jornada. À professora Suzana Amato, que ainda na minha graduação abriu as portas de seu laboratório e fez com que eu me interessasse pelos nematoides (e outros helmintos). Agradeço também pelas sugestões enquanto banca de acompanhamento deste mestrado. Ao Filipe Bianchi, por todo auxílio (principalmente na parte de bancada), pelas trocas de ideias sempre frutíferas e por aceitar fazer parte das bancas de acompanhamento e examinadora.
    [Show full text]
  • Somatic Antigens from Male and Female Adults of Setaria Cervi: Immune Reactions in Guinea Pigs
    Rev. Biol. Trop., 35(1): 69-71, 1987. Somatic antigens from male and female adults of Setaria cervi: immune reactions in guinea pigs Sanjeev Kumar Department of Zoology, Institute of Advaneed Studies, Meerut University, Meerut 250 005, U.P., India (Reeeived June 5, 1986) Abstraet: Antigens obtained from adult female Setaria cervi were more proteetive than those of males against the development of microfilaremia in guinea pigs (transplanted with 10 S. cervi). In high dose levels (2 mi 500 ¡.tI/mI) significant resistanee was indueed by antigens from male (52% of proteetion) and female (6 2%of proteetion) worms. The antigens from female worms were effeetive (40% proteetion) at low dose level (2 mi 50 ¡.tI/mI) also. Extensive studies on the development of saline and the two sexes were separated. immunity by somatic antigens obtained from Microfilariae (mf): Microfilariae were recov­ nematodes have been reviewed by Lal et al. , ered fron the peripheral blood of the infected (1985). In addition, studies on the somatic an­ animals by density gradient centrifugation on tigen-induced resistan ce in the host have Percoll in 0.25 M sucrose according to Chan­ produced contradictory results (Soulsby, 1963; drashekar et al. , (1984). The number of mf in a Crandall and Arean, 1965; Lehnert, 1967; Gue­ sample was estimated by dilution technique. rrero and Silverman, 1969, 1971; Stromberg and Soulsby, 1977; Horii et al. , 1985). A care­ Preparation of Antigens: A known number fui screening of literature reveals that Setaria of male and female worms was washed in cervi, the most prevalent cattle filarial worm in distilled water and extruded in a Pressure Cell the Meerut region, has remained untouched as Extruder at 20,000 psi.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Variability of Filarioid Nematodes of the Genus Setaria Viborg, 1795 Occurring in Wild Ruminants in Europe: a Review*
    ANIMAL SCIENCES INTERSPECIFIC VARIABILITY OF FILARIOID NEMAtodES OF THE GENUS SETARIA VIBORG, 1795 OCCURRING IN WILD RUMINANTS IN EUROPE: A REVIEW* S. Lanková, P. Vejl, M. Melounová, I. Langrová Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Prague, Czech Republic Nematodes of the genus Setaria (Spirurida, Filarioidea) are parasites of vertebrates except fish. Dangerous are their larvae (microfilariae) that may migrate to the central nervous system of hosts causing serious neuropathic disorders of vertebrates including human. Setaria cervi, S. labiatopapillosa, and S. tundra are potential parasites in wild ruminants in Europe. The most recent studies of variability among Setaria spp. are based on a combination of morphometric and molecular methods. Al- though there is no clear consistency in the morphological structures used by different authors, a morphological key was com- piled based on the body length, the arrangement of peribucal crown, and the number of papillae in the caudal part of the body. The barcoding system of Setaria genus is based on sequences of conserved gene polymorphisms such as COX1 and rDNA ge- nes. The published sequences of COX1 gene in Setaria populations were analysed using in silico phylogenetic analysis by the maximum likelihood method (Tamura-Nei model). This analysis confirmed that the COX1 nucleotide polymorphisms genes are species-specific and represent the theoretical basis for the development of markers enabling barcoding system in the genus Setaria. Setaria, cervidae, morphology, rDNA, COX1, species discrimination doi: 10.2478/sab-2019-0005 Received for publication on March 9, 2018 Accepted for publication on May 3, 2018 INTRODUCTION 1986) and are easily visible when removing organs of the wild game (C h r o u s t , F o r e j t e k , 2010).
    [Show full text]