Describing the Spatial Organization of Bishapur City Based on Archeological Findings

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Describing the Spatial Organization of Bishapur City Based on Archeological Findings Mahmoud Teimoury, Ali Akbar Sarfaraz | Describing the Spatial Organization Describing the Spatial Organization of Bishapur City based on Archeological Findings Ali Akbar Sarfaraz Mahmoud Teimoury [email protected] [email protected] Professor of Archeology, Nazar Ph.D candidate in Architecture, research center, Iran. University of Paris1, France. Abstract The ancient city of Bishapour was one of the first cities that were built by Shapour after Darabgard and Ard- eshirkhoreh (Gour or Firouzabad). It is among the few cities from ancient Persia that have partly remained and can therefore be used to introduce the common Persian urban structures of its own time. There have been few studies over ancient urban structures in Iran which could be used to identify their functions and the way the cit- ies were built and developed. The scarcity of studies on this issue has been despite the fact that there has been considerable academic attention on ancient Persia. A few studies that architects and scholars of urban devel- opment have carried out over the spatial organization of Iran’s ancient cities were mostly based on unreliable documents and were not supported by archeological findings. The purpose of the present article is to introduce and analyze the process of urban development of the Sassanid city of Bishapour based on available documents as well as the archeological findings obtained from 1958 to 1978. In order to arrive at a better analysis, the Theory of Urban Spatial Organization was exploited. The Theory introduces the city as a purposeful entirety with four main elements such as the domain, the structure, the small entireties and the center. Accordingly, after analyzing the above elements in Bishapour, the spatial organization of the city is analyzed by considering the social-cultural conditions in the Sassanid era and a brief comparison is made with the general conditions of the spatial organization of an Iranian-Islamic city. Keywords Bishapour, Ancient city, Iranian city, Sassanid city, Spatial organization of the city, Shapour, Historical structure. 11 jocO quarterly, Vol.1, No.1. Autumn 2013 The History of Bishapur as “Veh-Din” which means the good religion, that Bishapur is an ancient city located in the province is, the religion of God and light. “Veh” or “Beh” of Fars-Kazerun. Although there is evidence of in- has also been interpreted to mean “home” and “a habitation related to Achaemenian and Elamite eras dwelling place”, in which case Bishapour could in the area, Bishapur was constructed and named as mean “the house of Shapour”. This is while oth- a city in Sassanid Empire. Bishapur stands fifteen ers interpret the name as to mean “good deeds of kilometers northwest of Kazerun at the geographi- Shapour” (Ibid: 248). cal coordinates of N: 29°46´, E: 51°34´. It was the As Estakhri in his Masalek-al-Mamalek and Ebn- center of the empire and Ardeshir Khore Koreh e-Balkhi in his Fars-Nameh write of the name of (one of the five mains sections of the empire) and Bishapour, “the city of Bishapour was built during was populated up to the seventh century Hijri be- the reign of Tahmoures, who ruled before Jamshid, fore falling to collapse. This city is a treasure of and was then called “Din-Doula”. Shapour rebuilt Sassanid architecture such as the Shrine of Anahita the city after it had been destroyed by Alexander, which it houses. the Great and named it Bishapour. The city is now Bishapour is the first ancient Iranian city with a called Beshar and Besabour” (Sarafraz, 1987: 37). written history of urban development. This writ- According to Ebn-e-Balkhi, the city was originally ten history is in fact an inscription in both Sassanid named Bishapour, or shortly called Shapour with- and Arsacid scripts on one of the two stone pillar out the “Bi”. Hence, the title Bishapour was valid bases at the city center. According to the inscrip- up to the end of the 11th century AD and the be- tion, the city’s development dates back to year 58 ginning of the 12th century AD. Nevertheless, the of Ardeshir’s reign and year 40 of Shapour’s reign city’s name in times of Shapour seems to have been which coincide with 266 AD, exactly 6 years after “Beh az Andiou Shapour” which implied “Better Shapour’s victory over Valerian in 260 AD. This than Antakiyeh, City of Shapour”; this assumption is the date when the construction of Bishapour fin- rests on the fact that Bishapour is not mentioned in ished. According to Abbas Zaryab-Khoyee, “in the the inscription of Ka’be-ye-Zartosht among the list city of Bishapour in Fars, an inscription by a certain of cities, while there is a city named after the ruler Apsay the Secretary is discovered besides his statue “Vehi Antiouk Shapour”. Some theoreticians have which also includes the inscription’s date” (Sarafraz, assumed that “Beh az Andiou Shapour” must have 2002: 262). The year of construction is believed to been the same as the Sassanid “Gondi Shapour”, be 266 AD while the name of the city, which was not a not-very-important camp where captive Roman mentioned in the inscription, is unknown. soldiers were taken. But it is far from being likely After assuming power, Ardeshir Babakan – the that the inscription mentioned a captive camp but founder of the Sassanid dynasty – moved the capital neglected the royal city and the government head- from Estakhr, the city of his ancestors, to Tisfoun quarters of Shapour: a city famous for its beauty and built a new city with the name ‘Veh-Ardeshir’ where flocks of people rushed to visit every now adjacent to it. Shapour (241-272), Ardeshir’s son, and then. The above historical narrative might con- later built a different abode and called it Bishapour. tribute to our further understanding of the origins The interesting point here is the way the new cit- of the city’s name. Having occupied Antakiyeh, the ies were named – a tradition popular among all beautiful city of Eastern Roman empire, Shapour Sassanid kings. Examples include Beh-Ardeshir, was so fascinated by its beauties that he ordered to Beh-Qobad, Beh-Khosrow and Beh-Shapour. The build him a headquarters even better than Antaki- prefix “Veh” or “Beh” means good and appears yeh. The comparative “Veh”, meaning better, must in many Pahlavid names of the Sassanid era, such have been used to compare Antakiyeh – which was 12 Mahmoud Teimoury, Ali Akbar Sarfaraz | Describing the Spatial Organization the largest, richest and most beautiful city of East- Bishapour was built at the mouth of Bishapour ern Roman empire, occupied by Shapour in 251 Strait, overlooking the beautiful, green Bishapour AD – and Shapour’s city with its tall, ornamented plain (or Kazeroun plain) and at the skirt of Kouh- porches. (Sarafraz & Firouzmandi, 2002: 249). mareh heights, where the heights from the one side What is significant about the architecture of the and the river from the other protect its borders from city is its difference with the cities raised during being violated. Unlike the city of Ardeshir-Khoreh the Islamic era. In Sassanid Empire, a city was not (Firouz-Abad) which is located in the middle of a a place for collective activities, great populace and vast plain and protected by Qal’e Dokhtar, a castle numerous houses protected inside fortifications, located in a quite far distance, Bishapour is located which would possibly be interpreted as a cultural at the mountain-skirt and at the edge of the plain, center for man’s collective mentality. In ancient with minimum distance from the two protective Iran, a city was a holy place which could not be castles i.e Qal’e Dokhtar and Qal’e Ardeshir in the raised by just any one person. Only kings, who pos- mountains surrounding Chowgan Strait. (diagram1) sessed royal grandeur, were allowed to order con- struction of a city (Barati, 2003). Therefore, cities belonged to a god and his/her delegates on earth not to the inhabitants. A city was a relatively huge body which was constructed by the order of a king to house royal families and servants as well as cho- sen people such as instructors and high ranking of- ficers. It was a place which represented the royal grandeur of the king and his personal tastes, not a place for trafficking of the different walks of life and manifestation of the popular culture. Diagram1. Location of Bishapour at the mouth of Choqgan strait and Location at the skirt of mount Shapour, Source: authors. The location of the city of Bishapour was cleverly The Mount Shapur situated the eastern wing of the determined in such a way as to employ local geo- city was the most prominent feature used for navi- graphical features both for security purposes and gation in those days, and the Shapur River had a for benefiting from natural beauties. The city was very significant role in the construction of the city built adjacent to an ancient royal road which was regarding the sanctity of water among ancient Ira- one of the most important passages at the time; it nians. The four precious Sassanid reliefs on the connected Persepolis and Estakhr and thereon to western mouth of Chowgan Strait, at the breast of Shoush during the era of the Achaemenids. The road mount Shapour and the northern bank of Shapour also connected (Jour) Firouz-Abad and Bishapour River, besides the two reliefs at the river’s southern to Tisfoun during the Sassanid era. Another major bank which depict a scene of Shapour’s victory, road ran from Bishapour to the coasts of the Persian among others, are signs of emphasis put on the Gulf, which was not only used for military purpos- holiness of this natural site in the Sassanid period.
Recommended publications
  • Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region”
    Islamic Republic of Iran Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization ICHHTO “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” for inscription on the World Heritage List (Additional Information) UNESCO World Heritage Convention 2017 1 In the name of God 2 Evaluation of the nomination of the “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” (Islamic Republic of Iran) for inscription on the World Heritage List This report is submitted in response to the ICOMOS letter of GB/AS/1568-AddInf-1, dated 28September 2017 on the additional information for the nomination of Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region. The Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization is grateful to ICOMOS for its devotion to conservation and preservation of historic monuments and sites. The objective of this detailed report is to clarify the issues raised by ICOMOS in the aforementioned letter. Additional information for clarification on: - Serial approach - Risks and Factors affecting the property - Protection - Management - Monitoring 1- Serial approach Could the State Party kindly provide information on the rationale, methodology and criteria (here not referring to the nomination criteria), which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination? Could the State Party kindly outline the contribution of each site component, to the overall Outstanding Universal Value in the substantial, scientific and discernible way, as outlined in paragraph 137b of the Operational Guidelines? For clarifying, the question will be explained in the parts of (1-a) and (1-b) in details: 1-a: Rationale, methodology and criteria which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination: The rationale which guided the selection of the component sites is based on a methodology which takes into account their historical characteristics and at the same time considers their association with the regional landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Achaemenid Empire/ (Persia) BY: HOZAN LATIF RAUF General Architectural Features
    Achaemenid Empire/ (Persia) BY: HOZAN LATIF RAUF General Architectural features ▪ The architecture of Persians was more columnar and that led to vastly different massive architectural features from that of the Mesopotamian era. ▪ The use of flat timber roofs rather than vaults led to more slender columns and were rather more beautiful. This also led to rooms being squarer in shape than simple long rectangle. ▪ The roofing system was also very different, wherein the wooden brackets were covered in clay and provided more stability. The use of a double mud wall might have provided room for windows just below ceiling in structures like Palace of Persepolis. VOCABULARY WORDS ▪ The COLUMN is divided into three parts: ▪ The BASE ▪ The SHAFT- FLUTED ▪ The CAPITAL- Double Animal most with bulls Ancient Susa/Shush The city of SUSA was the Persian capital in succession to Babylon, where there is a building with a citadel complex. There was a good skill set of artisans and laborers available which made the palace complex more of a piece of art than just a building structure. Cedar wood was got from Lebanon and teak from the mountain of Zagros. The baked bricks were still made in the Babylonian method. Ancient Susa/Shush Ancient Persepolis PERSEPOLIS ▪ 518 BCE ▪ King Darius utilized influences and materials from all over his empire, which included Babylon, Egypt, Mesopotamian and Greece Architectural Plan of Ancient Persepolis The Great/Apadana Staircase ▪ King Xerxes (486-465 BC) built the Grand Staircase and the Gate of All Nations. ▪ The Grand Staircase is located on the northeast side of the city and these stairs were carved from massive blocks of stone.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Continuity in Sasanian Rock Reliefs
    0320-07_Iran_Antiq_43_12_Thompson 09-01-2008 15:04 Pagina 299 Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLIII, 2008 doi: 10.2143/IA.43.0.2024052 COMPOSITION AND CONTINUITY IN SASANIAN ROCK RELIEFS BY Emma THOMPSON (University of Sydney, Australia) Abstract: The cliffs of Iran are adorned with rock reliefs from every period of its long history. During the years that the Sasanian dynasty ruled Iran, artists added to this collection considerably. These monuments are individual capsules of infor- mation on the general political, religious, historical and artistic milieu of the time. This paper presents a method for furthering our understanding of the Sasanian period through an analysis of the composition of each Sasanian relief. The analy- sis is based on the hypothesis that composition will serve as an indicator of artis- tic continuity and change and encode an artistic signature of sorts indicating the artists’ background and training. The initial results suggest that the reliefs of the early Sasanian period reflect the work of artists from at least two schools of art. Keywords: Sasanian, rock reliefs, composition. The kings of the Sasanian dynasty ruled Iran for over four hundred years. During the first eighty-five years of the dynasty (AD 224-309) there were seven changes of crown, many military gains and losses and thirty rock carvings were commissioned to commemorate these events. Most of these were carved in Fars, the homeland of the dynasty: eight were carved in the company of the Achaemenid tombs at Naqsh-i Rustam; six line the way to Shapur’s city at Bishapur; four were carved in the open air grotto at Naqsh- i Radjab; two were carved near Ardashir’s first city at Firuzabad and the rest were carved as single reliefs at various locations across the province of Fars: Barm-i Dilak, Sar Mashhad, Sarab-i Bahram, Guyum, Rayy, Darab- gird, and Tang-i Qandil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reliefs of Naqš-E Rostam and a Reflection on a Forgotten Relief, Iran
    HISTORIA I ŚWIAT, nr 6 (2017) ISSN 2299 - 2464 Morteza KHANIPOOR (University of Tehran, Iran) Hosseinali KAVOSH (University of Zabol, Iran) Reza NASERI (University of Zabol, Iran) The reliefs of Naqš-e Rostam and a reflection on a forgotten relief, Iran Keywords: Naqš-e Rostam, Elamite, Sasanian, Relief Introduction Like other cultural materials, reliefs play their own roles in order to investigate ancient times of Iran as they could offer various religious, political, economic, artistic, cultural and trading information. Ancient artist tried to show beliefs of his community by carving religious representations on the rock. Thus, reliefs are known as useful resource to identify ancient religions and cults. As the results of several visits to Naqš-e Rostam by the author, however, a human relief was paid attention as it is never mentioned in Persian archaeological resources. The relief is highly similar to known Elamite reliefs in Fars and Eastern Khuzistan (Izeh). This paper attempts to compare the relief with many Elamite and Sasanian works and, therefore, the previous attributed date is revisited. Fig.1. Map showing archeological sites, including Naqš-e Rostam, on the Marvdasht Plain (after Schmidt, 1939: VIII ) PhD. student in Archaeology; [email protected] Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts and Architecture; [email protected] Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology; [email protected] Page | 55 Naqš-e Rostam To the south of Iran and north of Persian Gulf, there was a state known as Pars in ancient times. This state was being occupied by different peoples such as Elamite through time resulted in remaining numerous cultural materials at different areas including Marvdasht plain1 confirming its particular significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Sasanian Bas-Reliefs at Tang-E Chogan Under Invasion of Lichens and Fungi
    81 I RAN Sasanian Bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan under Invasion of Lichens and Fungi At several places near the town of Bishapur, which was founded by Sasanian King Shapur I (241–272) and was situated on the road between Persis and Elam, the King also had the sides of the Bishapur River gorge decorated with huge historical reliefs commemorating his triple triumph over Rome. The six reliefs at Tang-e Chogan show scenes such as Shapur enslaving the Roman Emperor; the King and his courtiers; or rows of registers with files of soldiers and horses, in a deliberate imitation of the narra- tive scenes on the Trajan column in Rome. The critical situation of these bas-reliefs is described in an arti- cle by CAIS (The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies): Lichens and vegetation growing in the cavities and cracks of the Sasanian bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan, a part of the ruins of the ancient city of Bishapur in southwestern Iran, are gradually Sasanian bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan (photo: Pedram Veisi) destroying these irreplaceable antiquities. The lichens and veg- etation are clearly visible on all six bas-reliefs, which are located 19 kilometres north of Kazerun, reported the Persian service of site historical monuments in Fars Province, has made no efforts the Mehr News Agency. One of the bas-reliefs depicts Shapur I, to save the ancient relics from the lichens and vegetation attacks. the Persian King of Kings who consolidated and expanded the The ancient city of Bishapur is also in peril by several other fourth Iranian dynastic empire founded by his father, Ardashir I.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Mar 22 / Fri, 01 Apr 22 NOK 21 929 På Forespørsel Ledig
    Tel : +47 22413030 | Epost :[email protected]| Web :www.reisebazaar.no Karl Johans gt. 23, 0159 Oslo, Norway Iran Adventure Turkode Destinasjoner Turen starter HPSN Iran Tehran Turen destinasjon Reisen er levert av 14 dager Tehran Fra : NOK Oversikt Conservative and unconventional, deeply religious and deeply surprising, Iran doesn’t fit into any easy pigeonhole. Spend two weeks following the ancient Silk Road through this under-touristed country to discover refined Islamic cities, colourful bazaars, ancient ruins, fascinating nomadic cultures and shimmering deserts. Whether you're relaxing in a teahouse in Tehran, enjoying guided tours of ancient cultural sites, or breaking bread with locals on the harsh Iranian plateau, the warmth and hospitality of the Iranian people is endearing, and the profound beauty of their land is mesmerising. Reiserute Tehran Welcome to Tehran! Iran's capital is exciting, noisy and chaotic. Home to 15 million people, Tehran is the country's beating heart and where its true national identity is found. Spending time in Tehran will not only transfer back in time through some 200 years of history with magnificent palaces and well curated museums, it will give you a glimpse of a modern and changing Iran, moving into the 21st century Expect to see contemporary cafes competing for space with traditional tea houses, this city is the dynamic and the dynamic chaotic Iran. On arrival at Tehran International Airport and transferred to your hotel. There will be a welcome meeting at 6 pm today. After the meeting, head out to get your bearings on an orientation walk with your leader maybe head out for dinner and get to know your fellow travel buddies and your Leader and sample Iranian cuisine, Yazd Discover Tehran on a walking tour with your local leader.
    [Show full text]
  • The Behistun Inscription and the Res Gestae Divi Augusti
    Phasis 15-16, 2012-2013 Δημήτριος Μαντζίλας (Θράκη) The Behistun Inscription and the Res Gestae Divi Augusti Intertextuality between Greek and Latin texts is well known and – in recent decades – has been well studied. It seems though that common elements also appear in earlier texts, from other, mostly oriental countries, such as Egypt, Persia or Israel. In this article we intend to demonstrate the case of a Persian and a Latin text, in order to support the hypothesis of a common Indo-European literature (in addition to an Indo-European mythology and language). The Behistun Inscription,1 whose name comes from the anglicized version of Bistun or Bisutun (Bagastana in Old Persian), meaning “the place or land of gods”, is a multi-lingual inscription (being thus an equivalent of the Rosetta stone) written in three different cuneiform script extinct languages: Old Persian, Elamite (Susian), and Babylonian (Accadian).2 A fourth version is an Aramaic translation found on the 1 For the text see Adkins L., Empires of the Plain: Henry Rawlinson and the Lost Languages of Babylon, New York 2003; Rawlinson H. C., Archaeologia, 1853, vol. xxxiv, 74; Campbell Thompson R., The Rock of Behistun, In Sir J. A. Hammerton (ed.), Wonders of the Past, New York 1937, II, 760–767; Cameron G. G., Darius Carved History on Ageless Rock, National Geographic Magazine, 98 (6), December 1950, 825– 844; Rubio G., Writing in Another Tongue: Alloglottography in the Ancient Near East, in: S. Sanders (ed.), Margins of Writing, Origins of Cultures, Chicago 2007², 33–70 (= OIS, 2); Hinz W., Die Behistan-Inschrift des Darius, AMI, 7, 1974, 121-134 (translation).
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets of Persia
    t: 01392 660056 e: [email protected] Iran Secrets of Persia Iran’s ancient Muslim culture has for many years seemed inaccessible to westerners. This is changing, so be quick to take the opportunity to show students a country of dramatic contrasts and be welcomed by a people who have reinvented what hospitality means! Blessed with scenery ranging from snow-clad mountains to vast, inhospitable deserts, this comprehensive tour uncovers the treasures of Persia, providing a fascinating insight for students learning about religion, history and archaeology. politics and history. Journey through Islamic centres at Yazd, Shiraz and Isfahan and visit the legendary ruins at Persepolis; this fascinating, and relatively undiscovered, country will never fail to impress and inspire. Recommended itinerary: Culture shock rating: Day 1: Arrival – Shiraz Physical rating: On arrival in Shiraz, we will be welcomed at the airport by an STC representative and transferred to our hotel. Day 2: Shiraz Sightseeing We will start our adventure in Iran with a full day of sightseeing in Shiraz, Irans cultural capital and a Pearl of Persia. Regarded as one of the oldest cities of ancient Persia, it has been a regional trade centre for over a thousand years, and conjours visions of tranquil gardens, lavish palaces, poets, philosophers and artist. We will make a visit to Vakil – a mosque built between 1751 and 1773 during the Zand period but later restored in the 19th century during the Qajar period. Later, we will visit Nasir-ol-molk, a stunning mosque displaying other traditional elements such as the Panj Kāse ("five concaved") design.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeoseismicity of the Mounds and Monuments Along the Kazerun Fault (Western Zagros, Sw Iranian Plateau) Since the Chalcolithic Period
    Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLIX, 2014 doi: 10.2143/IA.49.0.3009238 ARCHAEOSEISMICITY OF THE MOUNDS AND MONUMENTS ALONG THE KAZERUN FAULT (WESTERN ZAGROS, SW IRANIAN PLATEAU) SINCE THE CHALCOLITHIC PERIOD BY Manuel BERBERIANa , Cameron A. PETRIEb, D.T. POTTSc, Alireza ASGARI CHAVERDId, Amanda DUSTINGe, Alireza SARDARI ZARCHIf, Lloyd WEEKSg, Parsa GHASSEMIh & Reza NORUZIi (a Ocean County College, USA; b University of Cambridge, UK; c ISAW, NYU, USA; d Shiraz University, Iran; e University of Sydney, Australia; f Iranian Center for Archaeological Research, Iran; g University of Nottingham, UK; h Kohan Diar-e Mehr Archaeological Inst., Shiraz, Iran) Abstract: Our multidisciplinary investigation represents off-fault archaeoseismic indicators recorded in the archaeological remains at mounds and structural ele- ments of monuments situated along the Kazerun fault in the western Zagros Mountains since the Chalcolithic period. The study revealed two large magnitude earthquakes (~Mw >7.0, possibly ~7.3) ca. 3850-3680 BC and ca. 3030 BC with return periods of ~735 +? years at Tol-e Spid. Detecting only two earthquakes during the 4,000 year life span of archaeological mound is incompatible with the 3.6-3.9 slip rate along the Kazerun fault. After a long gap in data, a strong earth- quake indicator is recorded ca. 400-200 BC in Qal’eh Kali; all located to the north of the Kazerun fault bend. On the contrary, in addition to the vandalism episodes during the invasions of the Moslem Arabs (16/637), the Mongol hordes (1219- 1250), and Timur (1370-1405), the structural elements of the royal Sasanid city of Bishapur, located to the south of the fault bend, indicated archaeoseismic indicators of four possible earthquakes within a period of 800 years.
    [Show full text]
  • A Modern Archaeology of the Sasanian Period: Former Limitations and New Perspectives
    Newsletter di Archeologia CISA, Volume 7, 2016, pp. 35-88 A MODERN ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE SASANIAN PERIOD: FORMER LIMITATIONS AND NEW PERSPECTIVES Bruno Genito, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” Introduction* It is never easy to handle theoretical and methodological issues arising from a particular scientific topic in a kind of review of studies, which is, in its way, what is being presented here. Studies of the archaeology of the Sasanian period have been the subject of numerous acute and critical comments by distinguished scholars in the past, including Huff (1986, 302-308) and more recently as well (1998-2011). Those issues which have been handled, too, have clearly always somewhat suffered from a complex of inferiority to other periods of the history of ancient Iran which are considered by far, the most formative and important: the Achaemenid and the Islamic eras. And this in spite of the fact that the majority of scholars have looked upon the period in question as a real golden age of Persian culture and art, and that it was quite often mentioned in later Islamic sources (including the Shah-nameh by Firdousi), as in many ways an apogee of the fabulous, formidable and legendary Persian Empires. For many scholars the archaeology of the Sasanian period and also that of the early Islamic period, as Whitcomb rightly has pointed out (2010, 5), has always been considered a part of history, and especially of the history of art. This classification, set in stone, has had a long and respectable tradition so far, but at last it has begun to be seen from a different perspective by a growing number of scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • About Shiraz the City: Shiraz Is a City of Sophistication That Has Been Celebrated As the Heartland of Persian Culture for More Than 2000 Years
    About Shiraz The City: Shiraz is a city of sophistication that has been celebrated as the heartland of Persian culture for more than 2000 years. Known as the Dar-ol-Elm (House of Learning),the City of Roses,City of Love and City of Gardens,Shiraz has become synonymous with education, nightingales, and poetry. It was one of the most important cities in the medieval Islamic world and was the Iranian capital during the Zand dynasty (AD 1747–79), when many of its most beautiful buildings were built or restored. This city is situated in the south east of Iran and is the capital city of Fars Province, with a population of about 1 500 000. Shiraz is mild in spring and hot in the summer. The autumns in Shiraz are not too cold; however, the winters tend to be quite cold. Sites to Visit: The Shrine of Shahe-e-Cheragh Sayyed Mir Ahmad,one of Imam Reza’s 17 brothers, was hunted down and killed by the caliphate on this site in AD 835. His remains are housed at the glittering Aramgah-e Shah-e Cheragh. A mausoleum was first erected over the grave during the 12th century but most of what you see dates from the late-Qajar period and the Islamic Republic; expansion is ongoing. Persepolis Persepolis (Old Persian: Pārsa,Takht-e Jamshid or Chehel Minar) was the ceremonial capital of the Achaemenid Empire (ca. 550-330BCE). Persepolis is situated 70 km northeast of the modern city of Shiraz in the Fars Province of modern Iran. In contemporary Persian,the site is known as Takht-e Jamshid (Throne of Jamshid).
    [Show full text]
  • Lionel Bier Drawings of Monuments and Sites in Iran
    Lionel Bier Collection Ryan Murray 2021 Freer Gallery of Art and Arthur M. Sackler Gallery Archives Washington, D.C. 20013 [email protected] https://www.freersackler.si.edu/research/archives/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 2 Local Numbers................................................................................................................. 2 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 3 Series : Drawings, 1976, undated............................................................................ 3 Series : Site Files, 1975-1992.................................................................................. 5 Lionel Bier Collection FSA.A2004.05 Collection Overview Repository: Freer Gallery of Art and Arthur M. Sackler
    [Show full text]