DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report UTCO-Final.Pages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

[cover page] FINAL REPORT CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP ON THE MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN IRAN GOLESTAN PALACE - TEHRAN 25 APRIL - 03 MAY 2015 DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this publication and those of the authors are do not necessarily reflect the views of the UNESCO, II.TED or the Iranian Cultural Heritage Handicraft and Tourism Organization. Realized by II.TED - International Institute on Territorial and Environmental Dynamics Via Napoleone Bonaparte, 52 Florence (50135) ITALY [email protected] Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization Tehran Cluster Office Sa’adabad Historical Complex , Tehran (19896-43936) I.R. IRAN © UNESCO UTCO 2015 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/ tehran/about-this-office/publications/). Lead author and coordination: Siavash Laghai Supervision: Esther Kuisch Laroche Reviewers and other contributors: Alessio Re, Bogusław Szmygin, Firoozeh Salari, Jukka Jokilehto and all the participants of the Capacity Building Workshop on the Management Planning for World Heritage Sites in Iran. Copyediting and proofreading: Iszara Blake Acknowledgements: We would like to express our gratitude and appreciation of the Iranian Cultural Heritage Handicraft and Tourism Organization, the Embassy of the Republic of Poland in Tehran and the Golestan Palace World Heritage Site. Table of Contents Note on the UNESCO Tehran Cluster Office 6 Note on the International Institute on Territorial and Environmental Dynamics 6 Introduction 7 Chapter 1: World Heritage.................................................................................................................... 9 World Heritage Global Strategy 9 World Heritage Strategy for Capacity Building 9 World Heritage and I.R. Iran 11 Iranian properties inscribed on the World Heritage List 11 Iranian properties submitted on the Tentative List 12 Chapter 2: The Capacity Building Workshop................................................................................... 14 Topics and aims 15 Workshop program 16 Activities and discussions 17 Chapter 3: Selected Papers ..............................................................................................................20 Interrogating Universality in Conservation Theory 20 Analysis of Doctrinal Texts in Heritage Protection 31 Management planning for World Heritage properties: culture as a driver for development 43 Chapter 4: Participants....................................................................................................................... 56 Participants selected work 58 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................... 61 Annex................................................................................................................................................... 62 Glossary 62 The Criteria for Selection 65 Pictures 66 References 67 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP ON THE MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN IRAN TEHRAN 25 APRIL-03 MAY 2015 Final Report $5 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP ON THE MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN IRAN TEHRAN 25 APRIL-03 MAY 2015 Note on the UNESCO Tehran Cluster Office The UNESCO Tehran Cluster Office (UTCO) was established in January 2003. The Office covers four countries in the region, namely the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Islamic Republic Pakistan and Turkmenistan. Programmes for Afghanistan and Pakistan are managed through UNESCO Offices in Kabul and Islamabad, while programmes for Iran and Turkmenistan are managed directly by the Tehran Cluster Office. UTCO works in close co-operation with the UNESCO National Commissions and key governmental partners of the four cluster countries, as well as UN Agencies. At the regional level, UTCO also co-operates with UNESCO's regional offices in Bangkok and Jakarta. UNESCO Tehran Cluster Office closely co-operates with the relevant government authorities of the four cluster countries of I.R. of Afghanistan, I.R. of Iran, Pakistan and Turkmenistan, UN and UNESCO offices in the region. UTCO has a wide range of partners in the programme areas of education, culture, natural sciences, communication and information, as well as in the interdisciplinary fields pertinent for the region, such as integrated disaster management. UTCO works with several ministries of Science and Technology, Energy and Education as well as government bodies such as Iranian Cultural Heritage and Handicraft Organization, Iranian Technical and Vocation Organization. Note on the International Institute on Territorial and Environmental Dynamics II.TED International Institute on Territorial and Environmental Dynamics is a non-profit and non-governmental organisation based in Florence. II.TED principally aims to arise community awareness and to put emphasis on building capacities and competencies for the preservation, valorisation and promotion of heritage sites and places, towards a sustainable management. II.TED promotes respect for environment and landscape, bases that need to be preserved as an irreplaceable common heritage of humanity. II.TED is based on founding documents, conventions and recommendations such as the European Landscape Convention, The UNESCO World Heritage Convention, UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, the Ramsar Convention on wetlands and the UNESCO Recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape. Final Report $6 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP ON THE MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN IRAN TEHRAN 25 APRIL-03 MAY 2015 Introduction According to the UNESCO and ICOMOS charters, conventions and recommendations that are outlined in the international framework for conservation approaches, it is evident that there is a need for heritage management with democratic governance, including monitoring and evaluation processes. It is especially important to consider the increasing complexity of culture and heritage, specifically in reference to the UNESCO World Heritage Convention (1972)1, The Nara document on Authenticity (ICOMOS, 1994)2, The Australia ICOMOS charter for the conservation of places of cultural significance (Burra Charter,1999)3 and the UNESCO Recommendation on Historic Urban Landscape (2011)4 as they demonstrate the most complex categories of heritage such as historic and modern urban areas, rapid and uncontrolled urbanisation and in-between landscapes. According to "Governance in the New Millennium", governance amongst accepted traditions and institutional frameworks concerns the methods in how power is exercised, for example, who makes influential decisions and how they are held accountable for their decisions and actions (2000, p. 3)5. Defining and implementing the new generation of public policies is required in order to provide better governance of heritage sites and to clarify conservation policies. Nevertheless, capacity building and involving people within the decision making process- particularly those that have a strong associations with a place (Burra Charter, 1999), largely remains a complex process as factors such as legitimacy, administrative competence, community participation, economy, rule of law, policy and human rights, their role and their impact need to be considered carefully. The political dimension of heritage assumes more and more relevance of factors such as international dialogue opportunities (as testified in recent UNESCO policies and programs implemented in the Balkans and Palestine) in order to stimulate a sense of belonging that goes beyond local interests and to provide a basis for new forms of identity and citizenship. $1 Adopted by the General Conference at its seventeenth session Paris, 16 November 1972 $2 The Nara Document on Authenticity was drafted by the 45 participants at the Nara Conference on Authenticity in Relation to the World Heritage Convention, held at Nara, Japan, from 1-6 November 1994 $3 The Burra Charter was first adopted in 1979 at the historic South Australian mining town of Burra; minor revisions were made in 1981 and 1988. Following a five year review, more substantial changes were made resulting in this version which was adopt- ed by Australia ICOMOS in November 1999 $4 On 10 November 2011 UNESCO’s General Conference adopted the new Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape $5 Governance in the New Millennium: Challenges for Canada, Institute On Governance, January 2000 Final Report $7 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP ON THE MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN IRAN TEHRAN 25 APRIL-03 MAY 2015 Most importantly, when assuming the sustainability paradigm it is imperative to gain a deeper understanding of the irreplaceable quality of heritage resources and their significance and skill in their management when considering economic and political decision making. Siavash Laghai and Alessio Re Final Report $8 CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP ON THE MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR WORLD HERITAGE SITES IN IRAN TEHRAN 25 APRIL-03 MAY 2015 Chapter 1: World Heritage UNESCO seeks to encourage the identification, protection and preservation of cultural and natural heritage around the world that is considered to be of outstanding value to humanity. this
Recommended publications
  • Interview with Bahman Jalali1

    Interview with Bahman Jalali1

    11 Interview with Bahman Jalali1 By Catherine David2 Catherine David: Among all the Muslim countries, it seems that it was in Iran where photography was first developed immediately after its invention – and was most inventive. Bahman Jalali: Yes, it arrived in Iran just eight years after its invention. Invention is one thing, what about collecting? When did collecting photographs beyond family albums begin in Iran? When did gathering, studying and curating for archives and museum exhibitions begin? When did these images gain value? And when do the first photography collections date back to? The problem in Iran is that every time a new regime is established after any political change or revolution – and it has been this way since the emperor Cyrus – it has always tried to destroy any evidence of previous rulers. The paintings in Esfahan at Chehel Sotoon3 (Forty Pillars) have five or six layers on top of each other, each person painting their own version on top of the last. In Iran, there is outrage at the previous system. Photography grew during the Qajar era until Ahmad Shah Qajar,4 and then Reza Shah5 of the Pahlavi dynasty. Reza Shah held a grudge against the Qajars and so during the Pahlavi reign anything from the Qajar era was forbidden. It is said that Reza Shah trampled over fifteen thousand glass [photographic] plates in one day at the Golestan Palace,6 shattering them all. Before the 1979 revolution, there was only one book in print by Badri Atabai, with a few photographs from the Qajar era. Every other photography book has been printed since the revolution, including the late Dr Zoka’s7 book, the Afshar book, and Semsar’s book, all printed after the revolution8.
  • The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study

    The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study

    The Silk Roads: an ICOMOS Thematic Study by Tim Williams on behalf of ICOMOS 2014 The Silk Roads An ICOMOS Thematic Study by Tim Williams on behalf of ICOMOS 2014 International Council of Monuments and Sites 11 rue du Séminaire de Conflans 94220 Charenton-le-Pont FRANCE ISBN 978-2-918086-12-3 © ICOMOS All rights reserved Contents STATES PARTIES COVERED BY THIS STUDY ......................................................................... X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... XI 1 CONTEXT FOR THIS THEMATIC STUDY ........................................................................ 1 1.1 The purpose of the study ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background to this study ......................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Global Strategy ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.2.2 Cultural routes ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.3 Serial transnational World Heritage nominations of the Silk Roads .................................................. 3 1.2.4 Ittingen expert meeting 2010 ........................................................................................................... 3 2 THE SILK ROADS: BACKGROUND, DEFINITIONS
  • Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nineteenth-Century Iran

    Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nineteenth-Century Iran

    publications on the near east publications on the near east Poetry’s Voice, Society’s Song: Ottoman Lyric The Transformation of Islamic Art during Poetry by Walter G. Andrews the Sunni Revival by Yasser Tabbaa The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Shiraz in the Age of Hafez: The Glory of Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century a Medieval Persian City by John Limbert by Zeynep Çelik The Martyrs of Karbala: Shi‘i Symbols The Tragedy of Sohráb and Rostám from and Rituals in Modern Iran the Persian National Epic, the Shahname by Kamran Scot Aghaie of Abol-Qasem Ferdowsi, translated by Ottoman Lyric Poetry: An Anthology, Jerome W. Clinton Expanded Edition, edited and translated The Jews in Modern Egypt, 1914–1952 by Walter G. Andrews, Najaat Black, and by Gudrun Krämer Mehmet Kalpaklı Izmir and the Levantine World, 1550–1650 Party Building in the Modern Middle East: by Daniel Goffman The Origins of Competitive and Coercive Rule by Michele Penner Angrist Medieval Agriculture and Islamic Science: The Almanac of a Yemeni Sultan Everyday Life and Consumer Culture by Daniel Martin Varisco in Eighteenth-Century Damascus by James Grehan Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, edited by Sibel Bozdog˘an and The City’s Pleasures: Istanbul in the Eigh- Res¸at Kasaba teenth Century by Shirine Hamadeh Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle Reading Orientalism: Said and the Unsaid East by Ehud R. Toledano by Daniel Martin Varisco Britons in the Ottoman Empire, 1642–1660 The Merchant Houses of Mocha: Trade by Daniel Goffman and Architecture in an Indian Ocean Port by Nancy Um Popular Preaching and Religious Authority in the Medieval Islamic Near East Tribes and Empire on the Margins of Nine- by Jonathan P.
  • Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region”

    Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region”

    Islamic Republic of Iran Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization ICHHTO “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” for inscription on the World Heritage List (Additional Information) UNESCO World Heritage Convention 2017 1 In the name of God 2 Evaluation of the nomination of the “Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region” (Islamic Republic of Iran) for inscription on the World Heritage List This report is submitted in response to the ICOMOS letter of GB/AS/1568-AddInf-1, dated 28September 2017 on the additional information for the nomination of Sassanid Archaeological Landscape of Fars Region. The Iranian Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization is grateful to ICOMOS for its devotion to conservation and preservation of historic monuments and sites. The objective of this detailed report is to clarify the issues raised by ICOMOS in the aforementioned letter. Additional information for clarification on: - Serial approach - Risks and Factors affecting the property - Protection - Management - Monitoring 1- Serial approach Could the State Party kindly provide information on the rationale, methodology and criteria (here not referring to the nomination criteria), which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination? Could the State Party kindly outline the contribution of each site component, to the overall Outstanding Universal Value in the substantial, scientific and discernible way, as outlined in paragraph 137b of the Operational Guidelines? For clarifying, the question will be explained in the parts of (1-a) and (1-b) in details: 1-a: Rationale, methodology and criteria which guided the selection of the component sites presented in this nomination: The rationale which guided the selection of the component sites is based on a methodology which takes into account their historical characteristics and at the same time considers their association with the regional landscape.
  • Achaemenid Empire/ (Persia) BY: HOZAN LATIF RAUF General Architectural Features

    Achaemenid Empire/ (Persia) BY: HOZAN LATIF RAUF General Architectural Features

    Achaemenid Empire/ (Persia) BY: HOZAN LATIF RAUF General Architectural features ▪ The architecture of Persians was more columnar and that led to vastly different massive architectural features from that of the Mesopotamian era. ▪ The use of flat timber roofs rather than vaults led to more slender columns and were rather more beautiful. This also led to rooms being squarer in shape than simple long rectangle. ▪ The roofing system was also very different, wherein the wooden brackets were covered in clay and provided more stability. The use of a double mud wall might have provided room for windows just below ceiling in structures like Palace of Persepolis. VOCABULARY WORDS ▪ The COLUMN is divided into three parts: ▪ The BASE ▪ The SHAFT- FLUTED ▪ The CAPITAL- Double Animal most with bulls Ancient Susa/Shush The city of SUSA was the Persian capital in succession to Babylon, where there is a building with a citadel complex. There was a good skill set of artisans and laborers available which made the palace complex more of a piece of art than just a building structure. Cedar wood was got from Lebanon and teak from the mountain of Zagros. The baked bricks were still made in the Babylonian method. Ancient Susa/Shush Ancient Persepolis PERSEPOLIS ▪ 518 BCE ▪ King Darius utilized influences and materials from all over his empire, which included Babylon, Egypt, Mesopotamian and Greece Architectural Plan of Ancient Persepolis The Great/Apadana Staircase ▪ King Xerxes (486-465 BC) built the Grand Staircase and the Gate of All Nations. ▪ The Grand Staircase is located on the northeast side of the city and these stairs were carved from massive blocks of stone.
  • The Location Optimization of Wind Turbine Sites with Using the MCDM Approach: a Case Study

    The Location Optimization of Wind Turbine Sites with Using the MCDM Approach: a Case Study

    Energy Equip. Sys./ Vol. 5/No.2/ June 2017/165-187 Energy Equipment and Systems http://energyequipsys.ut.ac.ir www.energyequipsys.com The location optimization of wind turbine sites with using the MCDM approach: A case study Author ABSTRACT a* Mostafa Rezaei-Shouroki The many advantages of renewable energies—especially wind—such as abundance, permanence, and lack of pollution, have encouraged a Industrial Engineering Department, many industrialized and developing countries to focus more on these Yazd University, Yazd, Iran clean sources of energy. The purpose of this study is to prioritize and rank 13 cities of the Fars province in Iran in terms of their suitability for the construction of a wind farm. Six important criteria are used to prioritize and rank these cities. Among these, wind power density— the most important criterion—was calculated by obtaining the three- hourly wind speed data at the height of 10 m above ground level related to the time period between 2004 and 2013 and then extrapolating these data to acquire wind speed related to the height of 40 m. The Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method was used for prioritizing and ranking the cities, after which Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Article history: Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS) methods were used to assess the validity of the results. According to the results obtained from these Received : 20 September 2016 three methods, the city of Izadkhast is recommended as the best Accepted : 5 February 2017 location for the construction of a wind farm. Keywords: Wind Farm; Prioritizing; Optimization; Fars Province; Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).
  • Composition and Continuity in Sasanian Rock Reliefs

    Composition and Continuity in Sasanian Rock Reliefs

    0320-07_Iran_Antiq_43_12_Thompson 09-01-2008 15:04 Pagina 299 Iranica Antiqua, vol. XLIII, 2008 doi: 10.2143/IA.43.0.2024052 COMPOSITION AND CONTINUITY IN SASANIAN ROCK RELIEFS BY Emma THOMPSON (University of Sydney, Australia) Abstract: The cliffs of Iran are adorned with rock reliefs from every period of its long history. During the years that the Sasanian dynasty ruled Iran, artists added to this collection considerably. These monuments are individual capsules of infor- mation on the general political, religious, historical and artistic milieu of the time. This paper presents a method for furthering our understanding of the Sasanian period through an analysis of the composition of each Sasanian relief. The analy- sis is based on the hypothesis that composition will serve as an indicator of artis- tic continuity and change and encode an artistic signature of sorts indicating the artists’ background and training. The initial results suggest that the reliefs of the early Sasanian period reflect the work of artists from at least two schools of art. Keywords: Sasanian, rock reliefs, composition. The kings of the Sasanian dynasty ruled Iran for over four hundred years. During the first eighty-five years of the dynasty (AD 224-309) there were seven changes of crown, many military gains and losses and thirty rock carvings were commissioned to commemorate these events. Most of these were carved in Fars, the homeland of the dynasty: eight were carved in the company of the Achaemenid tombs at Naqsh-i Rustam; six line the way to Shapur’s city at Bishapur; four were carved in the open air grotto at Naqsh- i Radjab; two were carved near Ardashir’s first city at Firuzabad and the rest were carved as single reliefs at various locations across the province of Fars: Barm-i Dilak, Sar Mashhad, Sarab-i Bahram, Guyum, Rayy, Darab- gird, and Tang-i Qandil.
  • The Reliefs of Naqš-E Rostam and a Reflection on a Forgotten Relief, Iran

    The Reliefs of Naqš-E Rostam and a Reflection on a Forgotten Relief, Iran

    HISTORIA I ŚWIAT, nr 6 (2017) ISSN 2299 - 2464 Morteza KHANIPOOR (University of Tehran, Iran) Hosseinali KAVOSH (University of Zabol, Iran) Reza NASERI (University of Zabol, Iran) The reliefs of Naqš-e Rostam and a reflection on a forgotten relief, Iran Keywords: Naqš-e Rostam, Elamite, Sasanian, Relief Introduction Like other cultural materials, reliefs play their own roles in order to investigate ancient times of Iran as they could offer various religious, political, economic, artistic, cultural and trading information. Ancient artist tried to show beliefs of his community by carving religious representations on the rock. Thus, reliefs are known as useful resource to identify ancient religions and cults. As the results of several visits to Naqš-e Rostam by the author, however, a human relief was paid attention as it is never mentioned in Persian archaeological resources. The relief is highly similar to known Elamite reliefs in Fars and Eastern Khuzistan (Izeh). This paper attempts to compare the relief with many Elamite and Sasanian works and, therefore, the previous attributed date is revisited. Fig.1. Map showing archeological sites, including Naqš-e Rostam, on the Marvdasht Plain (after Schmidt, 1939: VIII ) PhD. student in Archaeology; [email protected] Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts and Architecture; [email protected] Assistant Professor, Department of Archaeology; [email protected] Page | 55 Naqš-e Rostam To the south of Iran and north of Persian Gulf, there was a state known as Pars in ancient times. This state was being occupied by different peoples such as Elamite through time resulted in remaining numerous cultural materials at different areas including Marvdasht plain1 confirming its particular significance.
  • Sasanian Bas-Reliefs at Tang-E Chogan Under Invasion of Lichens and Fungi

    Sasanian Bas-Reliefs at Tang-E Chogan Under Invasion of Lichens and Fungi

    81 I RAN Sasanian Bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan under Invasion of Lichens and Fungi At several places near the town of Bishapur, which was founded by Sasanian King Shapur I (241–272) and was situated on the road between Persis and Elam, the King also had the sides of the Bishapur River gorge decorated with huge historical reliefs commemorating his triple triumph over Rome. The six reliefs at Tang-e Chogan show scenes such as Shapur enslaving the Roman Emperor; the King and his courtiers; or rows of registers with files of soldiers and horses, in a deliberate imitation of the narra- tive scenes on the Trajan column in Rome. The critical situation of these bas-reliefs is described in an arti- cle by CAIS (The Circle of Ancient Iranian Studies): Lichens and vegetation growing in the cavities and cracks of the Sasanian bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan, a part of the ruins of the ancient city of Bishapur in southwestern Iran, are gradually Sasanian bas-reliefs at Tang-e Chogan (photo: Pedram Veisi) destroying these irreplaceable antiquities. The lichens and veg- etation are clearly visible on all six bas-reliefs, which are located 19 kilometres north of Kazerun, reported the Persian service of site historical monuments in Fars Province, has made no efforts the Mehr News Agency. One of the bas-reliefs depicts Shapur I, to save the ancient relics from the lichens and vegetation attacks. the Persian King of Kings who consolidated and expanded the The ancient city of Bishapur is also in peril by several other fourth Iranian dynastic empire founded by his father, Ardashir I.
  • Sekandar Amanolahi Curriculum Vitae

    Sekandar Amanolahi Curriculum Vitae

    Sekandar Amanolahi Curriculum Vitae Occupation: Professor of Anthropology E-mail: [email protected]; amanolahi @yahoo.com Phone: 89-7136242180, 617-866-9046 Education: A.A., University of Baltimore, 1964 B.A., Sociology, Morgan State University, 1968 M.A., Anthropology, University of Maryland, 1971 Ph.D., Anthropology, Rice University 1974 Scholarships and Research Grants: University of Maryland, scholarship, 1968-70 Rice University, scholarship, 1971-73 National Science Foundation (through Rice University), Research Grant, 1973 Shiraz University (formerly Pahlavi), scholarship, 1974 Shiraz University, Research Grant, 1976-77 Shiraz University, Research Grant, 1978-80 Harvard University, Fellowship, 1984-85 Namazi Foundation, 1984-85 Harvard University, Grant, summer 1988 National Endowment for Humanities Collaborative Grant, 1990-91 Aarhus University (Denmark) Research Foundation, summer 1991 Bergen University, Council for International Cooperation and Development Studies (Norway) 1991-92 Cultural Heritage Foundation (Center for Anthropological Studies), Research Grant, 1996-97 Shiraz University, Research Grant, 1996-97 Shiraz Municipality, Research Grant, 1997-98 Daito Bunka University (Japan) Fellowship, Summer 1999 UNFPA, Research Grant, University of London, Summer 2004. Fields of Special Interest Culture Change, Ethnic Relations, Tribes Pastoral Nomadism, Peasants, Gypsies, Urbanization, Migration, Globalization Courses Taught: Sociocultural Anthropology, Ethnological Theory, Nomadism, Social History of Iran, Kinship and Family, Rural Sociology, Peoples and Cultures of the Middle East, Introductory Physical Anthropology. Publications: 1970 The Baharvand: Former Pastoralist of Iran, unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology. Rice University. 1974 "The Luti, an Outcast Group of Iran," Rice University Studies, Vol. 61, Mo.2, pp. 1-12 1975 Social Status of Women among the Qashqai (in Persian) Tehran: Women Organization.
  • List of Cities in Iran

    List of Cities in Iran

    S.No. Name of City 1 Abadan 2 Abadeh 3 Abyek 4 Abhar 5 Abyaneh 6 Ahar 7 Ahvaz 8 Alavicheh 9 Aligoodarz 10 Alvand 11 Amlash 12 Amol 13 Andimeshk 14 Andisheh 15 Arak 16 Ardabil 17 Ardakan 18 Asalem 19 Asalouyeh 20 Ashkezar 21 Ashlagh 22 Ashtiyan 23 Astaneh Arak 24 Astaneh-e Ashrafiyyeh 25 Astara 26 Babol 27 Babolsar 28 Baharestan 29 Balov 30 Bardaskan 31 Bam 32 Bampur 33 Bandar Abbas 34 Bandar Anzali 35 Bandar Charak 36 Bandar Imam 37 Bandar Lengeh 38 Bandar Torkman 39 Baneh 40 Bastak 41 Behbahan 42 Behshahr 43 Bijar 44 Birjand 45 Bistam 46 Bojnourd www.downloadexcelfiles.com 47 Bonab 48 Borazjan 49 Borujerd 50 Bukan 51 Bushehr 52 Damghan 53 Darab 54 Dargaz 55 Daryan 56 Darreh Shahr 57 Deylam 58 Deyr 59 Dezful 60 Dezghan 61 Dibaj 62 Doroud 63 Eghlid 64 Esfarayen 65 Eslamabad 66 Eslamabad-e Gharb 67 Eslamshahr 68 Evaz 69 Farahan 70 Fasa 71 Ferdows 72 Feshak 73 Feshk 74 Firouzabad 75 Fouman 76 Fasham, Tehran 77 Gachsaran 78 Garmeh-Jajarm 79 Gavrik 80 Ghale Ganj 81 Gerash 82 Genaveh 83 Ghaemshahr 84 Golbahar 85 Golpayegan 86 Gonabad 87 Gonbad-e Kavous 88 Gorgan 89 Hamadan 90 Hashtgerd 91 Hashtpar 92 Hashtrud 93 Heris www.downloadexcelfiles.com 94 Hidaj 95 Haji Abad 96 Ij 97 Ilam 98 Iranshahr 99 Isfahan 100 Islamshahr 101 Izadkhast 102 Izeh 103 Jajarm 104 Jask 105 Jahrom 106 Jaleq 107 Javanrud 108 Jiroft 109 Jolfa 110 Kahnuj 111 Kamyaran 112 Kangan 113 Kangavar 114 Karaj 115 Kashan 116 Kashmar 117 Kazeroun 118 Kerman 119 Kermanshah 120 Khalkhal 121 Khalkhal 122 Khomein 123 Khomeynishahr 124 Khonj 125 Khormuj 126 Khorramabad 127 Khorramshahr
  • Service Quality Approach in Development of Children's Visit Model

    Service Quality Approach in Development of Children's Visit Model

    SERVICE QUALITY APPROACH IN DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN'S VISIT MODEL. CASE STUDY GOLESTAN PALACE MUSEUM, TEHRAN, IRAN Seyedeh Yasamin Hosseini Per citar o enllaçar aquest document: Para citar o enlazar este documento: Use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/667502 ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art.