Download This Article
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Field Testing and Structural Analysis of Burr Arch Covered Bridges in Pennsylvania
Field Testing and Structural Analysis of Burr Arch Covered Bridges in Pennsylvania Douglas Rammer1, James Wacker2, Travis Hosteng3, Justin Dahlberg4 and Yaohua Deng5 ABSTRACT: The Federal Highway Administration sponsored a comprehensive research program on Historic Covered Timber Bridges in the USA. This national program's main purpose is to develop improved methods to preserve, rehabilitate, and restore timber bridge trusses that were developed during the early 1800s and, in many cases, are still in service today. One of the many ongoing research studies is aimed at establishing a procedure for safely and reliably load- rating historic covered bridges though physical testing and improved structural modelling. This paper focuses on recent field work and analysis of four Burr Arch through-truss-type covered bridges located in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. An overview of field evaluation methods, loading testing, and structural modelling procedures are included along with a comparison of field measurements and structural model prediction of bridge behaviour. KEYWORDS: loading rating, structural analysis, covered bridges, historical landmark, burr arch 1 INTRODUCTION 123 established for historic covered bridges. Given the historic nature and unusual geometric features of these The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in structures, a procedure needs to be established detailing partnership with the USDA Forest Products Laboratory how to safely and reliably determine load ratings for and the National Park Service (NPS), sponsored a historic covered timber bridges through physical testing. comprehensive national research program on Historic Covered Timber Bridges in the USA. The main purpose Similarly, the complex behavior and unique details of is to develop improved methods to preserve, rehabilitate, covered bridges make structural modeling a daunting task and restore timber bridge trusses that were first developed for the typical bridge engineer. -
Over Jones Falls. This Bridge Was Originally No
The same eastbound movement from Rockland crosses Bridge 1.19 (miles west of Hollins) over Jones Falls. This bridge was originally no. 1 on the Green Spring Branch in the Northern Central numbering scheme. PHOTO BY MARTIN K VAN HORN, MARCH 1961 /COLLECTION OF ROBERT L. WILLIAMS. On October 21, 1959, the Interstate Commerce maximum extent. William Gill, later involved in the Commission gave notice in its Finance Docket No. streetcar museum at Lake Roland, worked on the 20678 that the Green Spring track west of Rockland scrapping of the upper branch and said his boss kept would be abandoned on December 18, 1959. This did saying; "Where's all the steel?" Another Baltimore not really affect any operations on the Green Spring railfan, Mark Topper, worked for Phillips on the Branch. Infrequently, a locomotive and a boxcar would removal of the bridge over Park Heights Avenue as a continue to make the trip from Hollins to the Rockland teenager for a summer job. By the autumn of 1960, Team Track and return. the track through the valley was just a sad but fond No train was dispatched to pull the rail from the memory. Green Spring Valley. The steel was sold in place to the The operation between Hollins and Rockland con- scrapper, the Phillips Construction Company of tinued for another 11/2 years and then just faded away. Timonium, and their crews worked from trucks on ad- So far as is known, no formal abandonment procedure jacent roads. Apparently, Phillips based their bid for was carried out, and no permission to abandon was the job on old charts that showed the trackage at its ' obtained. -
Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance
Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance Michael A. Ritter, Structural Engineer United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Ritter, Michael A. 1990. Timber Bridges: Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance. Washington, DC: 944 p. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author acknowledges the following individuals, Agencies, and Associations for the substantial contributions they made to this publication: For contributions to Chapter 1, Fong Ou, Ph.D., Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For contributions to Chapter 3, Jerry Winandy, Research Forest Products Technologist, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. For contributions to Chapter 8, Terry Wipf, P.E., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Structural Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. For administrative overview and support, Clyde Weller, Civil Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Engineering Staff, Washington Office. For consultation and assistance during preparation and review, USDA Forest Service Bridge Engineers, Steve Bunnell, Frank Muchmore, Sakee Poulakidas, Ron Schmidt, Merv Eriksson, and David Summy; Russ Moody and Alan Freas (retired) of the USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory; Dave Pollock of the National Forest Products Association; and Lorraine Krahn and James Wacker, former students at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. In addition, special thanks to Mary Jane Baggett and Jim Anderson for editorial consultation, JoAnn Benisch for graphics preparation and layout, and Stephen Schmieding and James Vargo for photographic support. iii iv CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 TIMBER AS A BRIDGE MATERIAL 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................. l- 1 1.2 Historical Development of Timber Bridges ............................. l-2 Prehistory Through the Middle Ages ....................................... l-3 Middle Ages Through the 18th Century ................................... l-5 19th Century ............................................................................ -
DEATH of TRU Have Him Around the House Again
A Genuine Pioneer Celebrates Birthday lif In hi him ti up to the ictive n- his on Febru- liisJ I COODBGE TAKEN BY DEATH JjOTfti-'fc—it T©L s STORIES DIES AT * PORT HOME. SHE WAS BORN _KlV&t) 18Q$45 __*•___-. i^uiff t/3* *JU Wrote "Katy Did" Keriea and Oth er 'Well-Known Children'. Book. —Father Wa. a Promi nent Educator. Henry Byal band- of the thelr borne, on East Sam [Specl.l Dispatch from the New York Sun.] NEWPORT, R. I.. April 9.—Miss (1 Willi li Sarah Chauncey Woolsey, better nd trailing known as Susan Coolidge, a writer of •in a (Tali children's stories, died suddenly of ' ill fur IV. heart disease at her home here to-day. Mr. and Mrs. i She was sixty years of age and | Itltlftll flo' 'ill- a daughter of the late John F. V tend their sey, of New Haven. Iforn • h Chaum wa« horn bly realising that the illness * gan reading law with the Hon. 1 in Cls i lS4b. Her family <n with the law LaBlond, and was admitted to the bar in of th' "ok, one of her uncles, flrm, which had been iniiintiiineil during 1869. Before this, he served two years Dwight Woolsey, win • and went to his oil as an enrolling clerk in the house of the Ohio general assembly. ,n educator at the head borne at Wauseon, in the hope that the Mr. Touvelle began the practice of of Yalo University. A cousin of "Su- change woud benefit Lira. Mrs. -
Technical Approach. Results
October 27, 2017 Kevin R. Kline, PE, District Executive PennDOT Engineering District 2-0 1924 Daisy Street - P.O. Box 342 Clearfield County, PA 16830 Dear Mr. Kline: Reference. PennDOT Engineering District 2-0, Statement of Work, subj: Concept Design for Vehicle Bridge over Spring Creek along Puddintown Road in College Township, Centre County, PA, dated September 1, 2017. Statement of Problem. The Spring Creek bridge, an integral part of College Township, was destroyed by a flood and has significantly altered the daily routines for all community members. Objective. To create a new design for the now-destroyed Spring Creek bridge. Design Criteria Using the bridge designer software, undergo two phases of design for both a Howe bridge and a Warren bridge: one to test economic efficiency and the other for structural efficiency. After achieving optimal specifications, construct both bridges out of popsicle sticks and test them to failure. Technical Approach. Phase 1: Economic Efficiency. For both the Howe and Warren bridges, design solutions that fit the constraints of $150,000 to $300,000 while stably holding the bridge’s own weight and a dead load. Phase 2: Structural Efficiency. Minimize the compressive and tension forces acting on the Howe and Warren designs while keeping them stable and in the cost constraints. Results. Phase 1: Economic Efficiency. After much trial and error, we came to a design that was able to support its dead weight, and the weight required. Although this met all design constraints, the economics of the trusses were far too great. We then took to research to try to understand the types of materials and how they would react under tension or compression. -
The Glass Firms at Greenfield, Indiana
The Glass Firms at Greenfield, Indiana Bill Lockhart, Beau Schriever, Bill Lindsey, and Carol Serr When Louis Hollweg – a jobber in crockery, tableware, lamps, and fruit jars – decided to branch out into the glass container manufacturing business in 1890, he built a glass factory that became the scene for five different operators over a 30-year period. Throughout most of its existence, the plant concentrated on fruit jar production, making a variety of jars that can be directly traced to the factory, especially to the Greenfield Fruit Jar & Bottle Co. Once the big- name firms (Ball Brothers and Owens) took over, the plant’s days were numbered. Histories Hollweg & Reese, Indianapolis, Indiana (1868-ca. 1914) Louis Hollweg and Charles E. Reese formed the firm of Hollweg & Reese in 1868. Located at 130-136 South Meridian Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, the company was a direct importer and jobber in crockery, pressed and blown tableware, lamps, lamp paraphernalia, and other fancy goods (Figure 1). After the death of Resse in 1888, Hollweg continued to use the Hollweg & Reese name. The last entry we could find for the firm was in 1913, so Hollweg probably disbanded the firm Figure 1 – Hollweg & Reese (Hyman 1902:354) (or sold out) ca. 1914 – a few years after he exited the glass business (Hyman 1902:354-355; Indiana State School for the Deaf 1914:90). Containers and Marks Although the firm’s main product list did not include containers, Hollweg & Reese apparently began carrying its own line of fruit jars by the 1870s, when William McCully & Co. made the Dictator, a jar similar to a grooved-ring, wax-sealer that was embossed with the 469 Hollweg & Reese name. -
Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types
Chapter 3—Historic Context for Common Historic Bridge Types 3.0 HISTORIC CONTEXT FOR COMMON HISTORIC BRIDGE TYPES This Chapter presents the historic contexts for the most common bridge types extant in the United States today. A “common historic bridge type,” as defined for the purposes of this study, will possess all of the characteristics below. 1) It is Common: a bridge type that is prevalent, i.e., the type is widely represented in extant examples throughout the regions of the United States. (As the discussions of the individual bridge types in this chapter indicate, some types are much less common than others.) 2) It is Historic: a type of bridge that meets National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) criteria for evaluation of significance, as outlined in the National Register Bulletin, How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. This includes types that are more than fifty years of age as of 2005. The date of 1955 was selected as the cut-off date for this study because it covers the period up to the passage of the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1956, which established the Interstate System and which permanently changed highway planning and design. (Since there are few NRHP-eligible or listed examples of types that have developed since 1955, they are not considered both historic and “common.”) 3) It is a Bridge Type: the primary determinate of “type” is the “form,” or manner in which the structure functions. A bridge type is not defined strictly according to materials; method of connection; type of span; or whether the majority of the bridge structure exists above or below the grade of travel surface. -
The-Mcgregor-Story
The Story Chapter 1 The McGregor Story TThe McGregor story starts in 1877 when Amasa Stone, the legendary capitalist and preeminent Cleveland philanthropist, and his wife, Julia, built and endowed one of the first private organizations in Cleveland specifically for the care of seniors — the Home for Aged Women, later to be renamed the Amasa Stone House, on what is now East 46th Street and Cedar Avenue. After training as a carpenter and building contractor in his native Massachusetts and moving to Cleveland in 1850, Amasa turned his considerable ambition to transportation. He built the Lake Shore Railroad, which ran between Erie, Pennsylvania and Cleveland as part of the New York Central. During the post-Civil War industrial boom, he found himself among America’s elite railroad builders. He also worked with his brother-in- law, William Howe, in designing a truss bridge to sustain heavy loads of rail cargo over short spans, like small gullies and ravines. Over the years Amasa became one of Cleveland’s leading business figures, eventually moving to a mansion on Euclid Avenue — dubbed “Millionaires Row” by the press — near a 3 Y R A R B I L Y T I S R E V I N U E T A T S D Tank wagons such as this, built N A L E V by the Standard Oil Company E L C , S in Cleveland in 1911, were N O I T C E standard equipment throughout L L O C the world in the petroleum L A I C E P industry. -
Chambers Covered Railroad Bridge Salvage and Rehabilitation
Chambers Covered Railroad Bridge Salvage and Rehabilitation Gregory W. Ausland, PE Greg has more than 27 years of Senior Project Manager civil/structural design and project management experience, OBEC Consulting Engrs and since 1989 has had the Eugene, Oregon, USA distinctive experience of being [email protected] the designer and/or project manager on rehabilitation and repair projects for 32 of Oregon's 50 covered bridges. Tony LaMorticella,PE, SE Inspired by the graceful bridges Sr. Project Engineer on the Oregon Coast, Tony became an engineer after OBEC Consulting Engrs building custom furniture for 15 Eugene, Oregon, USA years. He's been engaged in [email protected] structural design for 20 years, and has been lead design engineer on 18 covered bridge rehabilitation projects. Summary The Chambers Covered Bridge was built in 1925 and is the last remaining covered railroad bridge in Oregon, possibly the only one west of the Mississippi. Therefore, its rehabilitation was critical to historic preservation efforts of the country's remaining covered rail bridges. Before rehabilitation, the 27.4 m (90-foot) long timber structure was in danger of collapse after decades of neglect. In 2010 a windstorm threatened to destroy the bridge. This unique, single-span, four-leaf Howe truss structure was dismantled and rebuilt using almost all the original iron and hardware, and 25 percent of the original timber. The bridge was reconstructed on dry ground and launched onto the existing concrete piers. The rehabilitated Chambers Covered Bridge now serves as a landmark pedestrian and bicycle crossing that provides safe access across the Coast Fork of the Willamette River. -
Timber As a Bridge Material
TIMBER AS A BRIDGE MATERIAL 1.1 INTRODUCTION The age of wood spans human history. The stone, iron, and bronze ages were dramatic interims in human progress, but wood-a renewable re- source-has always been at hand. As a building material, wood is abun dant, versatile, and easily obtainable. Without it, civilization as we know it would have been impossible. One-third of the area of the United States is forest land. If scientifically managed and protected from natural disasters caused by fire, insects, and disease, forests will last forever. As older trees are harvested, they are replaced by young trees to replenish the wood supply for future generations. The cycle of regeneration, or sustained yield, can equal or surpass the volume being harvested. Wood was probably the first material used by humans to construct a bridge. Although in the 20th century concrete and steel replaced wood as the major materials for bridge construction, wood is still widely used for short- and medium-span bridges. Of the bridges in the United States with spans longer than 20 feet, approximately 12 percent of them, or 71,200 bridges, are made of timber. In the USDA Forest Service alone, approxi mately 7,500 timber bridges are in use, and more are built each year. The railroads have more than 1,500 miles of timber bridges and trestles in service. In addition, timber bridges recently have attracted the attention of international organizations and foreign countries, including the United Nations, Canada, England, Japan, and Australia. Timber’s strength, light weight, and energy-absorbing properties furnish features desirable for bridge construction. -
First Presbyterian ("Old Stone") HABS No. °-2L24 Church in Cleveland . J1'^" ' 91 Public Square, Northwest Corner OH/0 Rockwell Ave
First Presbyterian ("Old Stone") HABS No. °-2l24 Church in Cleveland . j1'^" ' 91 Public Square, northwest corner OH/0 Rockwell Ave. and Ontario St. \<&-ClW Cleveland Cuyahoga County \0 - Ohio PHOTOGRAPHS WtlTTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Buildings Survey Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 HISTOEIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY HABS No. 0-212^ • FIRST PRESBYTERIAN ("OLD STONE") CHURCH IN CLEVELAND, OHIO .j^r'10 to Location: 91 Public Square, northwest corner Rockwell Ave. and Ontario St., Cleveland, Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Present Owner: The First Presbyterian Society, Cleveland, Ohio. Present Occupant: The First Presbyterian Society in Cleveland, which was established 1820, when the population of Cleveland was about 150. Present Use: Church sanctuary. Statement of Preceded only a few months by Trinity Church Significance: (Episcopal), "The Old Stone Church" is Cleveland's second oldest. Established under the "Plan of Union" of the Presbyterian and Congregational Churches, it is the Mother Church in Cleveland of the many Presbyterian and Congregational Churches which followed. It is the oldest surviving building in the central city. PART I. HISTORICAL INFORMATION • A. Physical History: 1. Original and subsequent owners: About 1830 the site was purchased for $^00.00 with the gifts of ten early settlers There is no record of any use of this site (for building purposes) prior to 1832, when the first church building (55' x 80') was erected. This original gray sandstone structure had Tuscan pilasters. It was the first stone building used exclusively as a church in Cleveland. Eventually it was known as "The Stone Church," and later "The Old Stone Church" as the sandstone darkened. -
Historic STRUCTURES Gasconade Bridge Failure 1855 by Frank Griggs, Jr., Dist
historic STRUCTURES Gasconade Bridge Failure 1855 By Frank Griggs, Jr., Dist. M.ASCE, D.Eng., P.E., P.L.S. he Pacific Railroad was chartered in TMissouri in 1849 to build a railroad from St. Louis to the Pacific Ocean. Due to financing problems and outbreaks of cholera, construction did not begin until 1851 with a groundbreaking at which prominent citizens Gasconade bridge site. of St. Louis turned out to celebrate the start of construction of the line. It included speeches, a national salute, and the reading of a poem written for the moment in history. Due to the time required to make tunnels and build bridges, the load-carrying capacity. O’Sullivan had crossed the bridge and believed line did not reach the nearby city of Pacific until 1853. Much of the it to be safe. line between a point just east of Washington and Jefferson City was An account of the November 1st failure published in St. Louis along the Missouri River. Over the next two years, it would reach the newspapers is as follows, capital city of Jefferson City with a planned grand entry on November But how soon was the scene destined to be changed! How soon were so 1, 1855. All of their bridges were of wood with the largest one being many of those bounding hearts to be pulseless. No one dreamed that death across the Gasconade River, a tributary of the Missouri River. was near, and yet it lurked for us only a few miles further on. At 1 o’clock, The river was about 760 feet wide at the crossing, and stone abutments we left Hermann, preceded by a locomotive and tender, which had been and five piers were placed on a skew of about 30°.