DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on Universal Postal Service and the Postal Monopoly October 2008 TABLE of CONTENTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on Universal Postal Service and the Postal Monopoly October 2008 TABLE of CONTENTS Report On Universal Postal Service and The Postal Monopoly October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 II. Introduction and History ................................................................................................ 5 III. Definition of Universal Service Obligation and Postal Monopoly .............................. 9 A. Universal Service Features ...................................................................................9 B. Private Express Statutes .....................................................................................13 C. Mailbox Rule .........................................................................................................16 IV. Dimensions of the Universal Service Obligation ....................................................... 18 A. Range of Products ...............................................................................................18 B. Uniform Prices and Affordability ........................................................................18 C. Frequency of Delivery..........................................................................................19 D. Quality of Service .................................................................................................21 E. Access to Services and Facilities.......................................................................24 F. Geographic Scope................................................................................................29 G. Security of the Mail ..............................................................................................31 V. Public Service Requirements on the Postal Service ................................................. 32 A. Social Function / Preferential Pricing.................................................................32 B. Governmental Constraints ..................................................................................35 C. Community Presence...........................................................................................39 VI. Mailbox Access ............................................................................................................. 41 A. Safety and Security of the Mail ...........................................................................41 B. Public Perceptions ...............................................................................................43 C. Potential Impacts on Customer Service.............................................................45 D. Potential Impacts on Cost and Affordability......................................................45 E. Environmental Considerations ...........................................................................46 F. Conclusion............................................................................................................48 VII. Private Express Statutes .............................................................................................. 49 VIII. Potential Financial Impacts.......................................................................................... 52 A. Principles and Issues in Calculating Costs of the USO....................................52 B. Approach to Defining the Costs of the USO......................................................53 C. Costs of the USO under Current Environment..................................................54 D. Costs of the USO under Liberalized Environments ..........................................57 E. Conclusion............................................................................................................62 IX. Economic Efficiency Arguments ................................................................................. 62 X. Postal Reforms Internationally .................................................................................... 64 A. Context of Liberalization .....................................................................................65 B. Upside Potential of Liberalization.......................................................................67 C. Experience to Date in Other Countries ..............................................................69 D. Flanking Measures ...............................................................................................71 XI. Customer Satisfaction and Sentiment ........................................................................ 73 A. Customer Satisfaction Scores ............................................................................73 B. “Most Trusted Federal Agency” .........................................................................73 C. Public Outreach....................................................................................................74 D. Consumer Research Results ..............................................................................77 XII. Trade-offs and Stakeholder Impact ............................................................................. 80 A. Impact on the American Public...........................................................................80 B. Impact on the Mailing Industry ...........................................................................82 C. Impact on the Competitors..................................................................................83 D. Supporting Measures / Flanking Measures .......................................................83 XIII. The Future, Summary and Recommendations........................................................... 85 Appendices A. Universal Service and the Postal Monopoly: A Brief History B. Accenture Report: Postal Universal Service Obligation (USO) International Comparison: International Postal Liberalization – Comparative Study of US and Key Countries C. IBM Report: Quantitative Analysis of the Universal Service Obligation D. ILO Report: The Mailbox Monopoly: A New Look at the Last Mile E. RAND Report: The Role of the United States Postal Service in Public Safety and Security: Implications of Proposed Relaxation of the Mailbox Monopoly F. Great Lakes Marketing Report: Universal Service Obligation/Monopoly Research: Summary of Focus Group Research G. Comments of the United States Postal Service to the Federal Trade Commission Preface The Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 requires the Postal Regulatory Commission to submit a report to the President and Congress on universal postal service and the postal monopoly in December 2008. The Commission’s report must include the scope of universal service and the postal monopoly under current law, the scope likely required in the future to meet the needs of the American public, and any recommended changes. The Postal Act of 2006 requires the Commission to consult with and solicit written comments from the Postal Service. In addition, Section 710 of the Postal Act of 2006 requires the GAO by 2011 to make a broad range of recommendations and to include experiences of other countries. Therefore, the dialogue on universal postal service and postal monopoly, in many respects, is just beginning. Given the economy and significant dynamics in the marketplace for mailers and the Postal Service, this dialogue may need to occur sooner rather than later. This report represents the Postal Service’s initial effort to inform that dialogue. 2 I. Executive Summary The mission of the U.S. Postal Service is to provide the American public with trusted, affordable, universal service. Congress and the President set forth this mission by recognizing the Postal Service’s critical role in commerce and in binding the nation together. While not explicitly defined, the Postal Service’s universal service obligation (USO) is broadly outlined in multiple statutes and encompasses multiple dimensions: geographic scope, range of products, access to services and facilities, delivery frequency, affordable and uniform pricing, service quality, and security of the mail. While other carriers might offer delivery on a universal basis, the Postal Service is the only carrier obligated to provide all aspects of universal service at affordable prices. To ensure funding of the USO, Congress and the President established the Private Express Statutes (PES) and the mailbox access rule, which together comprise the postal monopoly. Since any obligation must be matched by the capability to meet that obligation, the USO, the PES, and the mailbox rule are inextricably linked. Recent growth in the American population and the number of delivery points has led to a significant increase in the Postal Service’s fixed costs, while over the last few years, volumes have taken a very visible downward turn. Recent economic trends certainly account for a good share of that downturn. So, too, does the acceleration of electronic diversion. Increasingly, personal correspondence is sent via the internet, financial statements arrive online, and bills are received and paid electronically. Online alternatives have become more prominent for news publications and advertising, and competition thrives in the package delivery arena. While the Postal Service may have a limited statutory monopoly, the reality is that there are alternatives to every piece of mail. The Postal Service believes that the broad definition of USO should be maintained. First, there has been no impetus for change towards a more strictly defined USO. As discussed in Section XI, surveys and hearings indicate that the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USPS Address Requirements for Automation Flats
    New Address Requirements for Automation, Presorted, and Carrier Route Flat-Size Mail AGENCY: Postal Service™. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Postal Service adopts new address placement and formatting requirements for Periodicals, Standard Mail®, Bound Printed Matter, Media Mail®, and Library Mail flat-size pieces sent at automation, presorted, or carrier route prices. We also adopt related revisions for automation and presorted First-Class Mail® flats. EFFECTIVE DATE: March 29, 2009 (one year after Federal Register final rule was published). [Note: The Pricing and Classification Service Center will consider submitted exception requests to use up preprinted stock or envelopes. No other exceptions will be granted. Business Mail Acceptance is now finalizing the postage adjustment for non-compliant pieces, but it is likely that all automation and presort discounts will be disallowed, in which case, single piece first class rates, based on weight, will apply.] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal Service is implementing a new technology, the Flats Sequencing System (FSS), to automate delivery sequencing for flat-size mail. Currently, flat-size mail is sorted mechanically only to the 9-digit ZIP Code™ or carrier level, and then manually sorted into delivery order by carriers. FSS can sort flat-size mailpieces into delivery sequence, increasing efficiency by re- ducing carriers’ time sorting mail, and allowing carriers to begin delivering mail earlier in the day. We can significantly increase efficiency and reduce delivery costs for flat-size mail with FSS technology. FSS can sequence flat mail at a rate of approximately 16,500 pieces per hour. Scheduled to operate 17 hours per day, each machine will be capable of sequencing 280,500 mailpieces daily to more than 125,000 delivery addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Postal Commerce • Latest Postcom Bulletin Has Been
    Association for Postal Commerce 1421 Prince St, Ste 410 * Alexandria, VA 22314 * USA * Ph.: +1 703 524 0096 * Fax: +1 703 524 1871 Postal News from November 2012: November 30, 2012 • Latest PostCom Bulletin has been posted. • Latest PostCom report on USPS quarterly service performance has been posted. • Latest This Week in Postal has been posted. The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Post & Parcel: Swiss Post has called off the launch of its "personalised" newspaper project, after a disappointing response from customers. Swiss Post The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. had been working with 11 national and international publishers on the project, with personalised newspapers digitally printed overnight at the Härkingen Letter Centre and delivered to major urban centres in Switzerland the day after an order is placed. MyNewspaper was one way to combine the physical with the digital communications channel in a hybrid mail product – sending information digitally to be turned into a physical mail delivery. The personalised newspaper was also available in digital form anywhere in the world. The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location. Industry Today: Skillweb has launched a new real-time planning tool to enable courier, parcel and postal organisations to reduce the time required to schedule and manage time- definite and same-day deliveries by as much as 75 per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Evidence from the German Interurban Bus Industry
    Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics by the Universities of Aachen ∙ Gießen ∙ Göttingen Kassel ∙ Marburg ∙ Siegen ISSN 1867-3678 No. 31-2017 Samuel de Haas, Daniel Herold and Jan Thomas Schäfer Entry deterrence due to brand proliferation: Empirical evidence from the German interurban bus industry This paper can be downloaded from http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb02/makro/forschung/magkspapers Coordination: Bernd Hayo • Philipps-University Marburg School of Business and Economics • Universitätsstraße 24, D-35032 Marburg Tel: +49-6421-2823091, Fax: +49-6421-2823088, e-mail: [email protected] Entry deterrence due to brand proliferation: Empirical evidence from the German interurban bus industry Samuel de Haas∗y Daniel Herold ∗ Jan Thomas Sch¨afer∗. July 27, 2018 Abstract In 2016, the largest operator in the German interurban bus industry, Flixbus, acquired its major rival, Postbus. We study the effects of that takeover using route-level data covering more than 6,000 routes. We find that Flixbus, on average, provided a lower fre- quency of bus rides and slightly decreased prices after the takeover. This indicates that Flixbus pursued a strategy of preemption: to decrease residual demand for Postbus, Flixbus offered a high number of bus rides. After the takeover, Flixbus decreased the supply of transportation services and lowered the prices to compensate the consumers for the resulting increase in inconvenience costs.1 JEL codes: L11, L41, L92, K21, K23 Keywords: Competition, Takeover, Interurban Bus Services, Brand Proliferation, Entry Deterrence ∗Chair for Industrial Organization, Regulation and Antitrust, Department of Economics, Justus-Liebig- University Giessen. Licher Strasse 62, 35394 Giessen, Germany yCorresponding author, e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • United States Postal Service: a Sustainable Path Forward Report from the Task Force on the United States Postal System
    United States Postal Service: A Sustainable Path Forward Report from the Task Force on the United States Postal System DECEMBER 2018 United States Postal Service: A Sustainable Path Forward Report from the Task Force on the United States Postal System December 4, 2018 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY WASHINGTON, D.C. December 4, 2018 The Honorable Donald J. Trump The White House Washington, DC Dear Mr. President: On April 12, 2018, you signed Executive Order 13829, which established the Task Force on the United States Postal System to evaluate the operations and finances of the United States Postal Service (USPS) and develop recommendations for administrative and legislative reforms for the U.S. postal system. The goal of these recommendations is to identify a path for the USPS to operate under a sustainable business model, providing necessary mail services to citizens and businesses, while competing fairly in commercial markets. The Task Force conducted extensive outreach to stakeholders and performed in depth research and analysis in order to understand the wide range of challenges facing the USPS. In addition to our August 10, 2018, submission, the Task Force presents here its findings and full list of recommendations. We believe these are the first steps forward in creating a sustainable business model under which the USPS can continue to provide necessary mail services for all Americans. Sincerely, Steven T. Mnuchin Secretary of the Treasury Chairman, Task Force on the United States Postal System Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... 1 A. Task Force on the United States Postal System ...............................................................1 B. Unsustainable Financial Path ...........................................................................................2 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 200/Monday, October 17, 2016
    71428 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 200 / Monday, October 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules Customs Clearance and Delivery Exhibit 116.1 USPS Trademarks in the inspect and photocopy all written IMM comments at USPS® Headquarters Fee: per piece $6.00. [Delete Standard Mail and add USPS Library, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., 11th International Business Reply Service Marketing Mail in correct alphabetical Floor N, Washington, DC by order] appointment only between the hours of Fee: Cards $1.35; Envelopes up to 2 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through * * * * * ounces $1.85. Friday, by calling 1–202–268–2906 in Following the completion of Docket 7 Treatment of Inbound Mail advance. Email comments, containing No. R2017–1, the Postal Service will * * * * * the name and address of the commenter, adjust the prices for products and may be sent to: ProductClassification@ 760 Forwarding services covered by the International usps.gov, with a subject line of ‘‘January Mail Manual. These prices will be on * * * * * 2017 Domestic Mailing Services Postal Explorer at pe.usps.com. Proposal.’’ Faxed comments are not 762 Mail of Domestic Origin accepted. Additionally, as general information, 762.1 Addressee Moved to Another the product name of Standard Mail®, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Country which is used in two instances in the Audrey Meloni at (856) 933–4360 or International Mail Manual but is not an * * * * * Lizbeth Dobbins at (202) 268–3789. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed International product, will change to 762.12 Mail Other Than Letters and prices will be available under Docket USPS Marketing Mail effective January Postcards 22, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Mail Processing Guidelines
    Contents 1 Introduction. 1 1-1 Definitions . 1 1-2 Benefits of Consolidation . 2 1-3 Evolution of AMP . 2 1-4 Overview of the AMP Process . 3 2 Feasibility Study . 7 2-1 Purpose. 7 2-2 Exclusions. 7 2-3 Getting Started . 8 2-4 Notification of Intent . 9 2-5 Completing Worksheets . 9 2-6 Supporting Documentation. 9 2-7 Public Disclosure . 10 2-8 Canceling a Feasibility Study . 10 3 Area Mail Processing Proposal. 11 3-1 Definition. 11 3-2 Summary Narrative . 11 3-3 Geographical Description . 12 3-4 Protocol for an AMP Proposal . 12 4 Communications . 15 4-1 Introduction. 15 4-2 Responsibilities. 15 4-3 Postal Service Accountability and Enhancement Act. 15 4-4 Communications Plan Overview. 16 4-5 Use of Public Input in Decision Making . 16 4-6 Public Disclosure . 17 5 AMP Worksheets . 19 5-1 Overview . 19 5-2 Protocol . 19 6 Implementation. 21 6-1 Definition. 21 March 2008 i Area Mail Processing Guidelines 6-2 Implementation Date. 21 6-3 Transition Period. 21 6-4 Impact Statement for Complement Adjustment. 22 6-5 Area and Local Coordination . 22 6-6 Responsibilities. 22 6-7 Proposal Modifications . 23 6-8 Facility Reclassification. 23 7 Post-Implementation Reviews . 25 7-1 Overview . 25 7-2 Time Frames . 25 7-3 Conducting a Post-Implementation Review . 25 7-4 Public Disclosure . 26 8 Reversal of Area Mail Processing. 27 8-1 Circumstances . 27 8-2 Process. 27 Appendix A — Area Mail Processing Worksheets . 29 A-1 AMP Data Entry Page .
    [Show full text]
  • European Postal Services and Social Responsibilities
    European Postal Services and Social Responsibilities How post offices enhance their economic, social and environmental role in society With the support of the European Social Fund, PIC Adapt With the support of European © Olivier Cahay in cooperation with with the support of www.csreurope.org This report was prepared byCSR Europe in cooperation with the Corporate Citizenship Company in the framework of a yearlong project initiated by La Poste and with the support of the EU ADAPT Programme 3 4 European Postal Services and Social Responsibilities 35 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments Foreword 7 Executive summary 10 1. Introduction: background, methodology and aim of the report 12 2. Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility at European and international levels 2.1 A new paradigm in Europe 14 2.2 Corporate Social Responsibility – drivers of change 14 2.3 CSR – an evolving approach 16 2.4 Developments at European and international levels 17 3. Debate over developments in the European postal sector 3.1 Internal market for European postal services 19 3.2 Universal service safeguards 20 3.3 Pan-European co-ordination 20 3.4 Future trends 21 4. Social responsibility in action 4.1 Diversity and equal opportunity in the workforce 23 4.2 Training and career development 26 4.3 Health and safety 29 4.4 Social dialogue and employee consultation 31 4.5 Access to services for disadvantaged groups and local regeneration 32 4.6 Community involvement and charities 34 4.7 Environment 35 5. Going forwa r d: conclusions and rec o m m e n d a t i o n s 39 Appendix: The research process and roundtable discussions 41 Disclaimer: while every effort has been made to check that the contents of this report were correct at time of printing, the publishers retain sole responsibility for the contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 80, No. 85/Monday, May 4, 2015/Rules And
    25528 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 85 / Monday, May 4, 2015 / Rules and Regulations POSTAL SERVICE 2015. This commenter recommended suggested that the Postal Service leaving the Exigent pricing in place as eliminate pursuing changes as mailers 39 CFR Part 111 long as there were no additional are moving toward electronic increases for the next two to three years. notifications instead of purchasing New Mailing Standards for Domestic A fulfillment company which uses Certificate of Mailing service. The Mailing Services Products various classes of mail and serves both commenter also stated that the Postal AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM. consumer and business customers, Service should permit the two domestic ACTION: Final rule. including commercial and non-profit, Certificate of Mailing options to remain urged deferral of the proposed price as they are today, and implement the SUMMARY: On April 16, 2015, the Postal increase for postage rates in 2015 until new version as optional. The mailer also Service filed a notice of mailing services 2016, except for the increases applicable suggested that the Postal Service change price adjustments with the Postal to Standard Mail® parcels. The the proposed rule to an Advanced Regulatory Commission (PRC), effective commenter stated that the Postal Service Notice. May 31, 2015. This final rule contains did not signal postage increases for Response: To provide clarification, the revisions to Mailing Standards of 2015, any time during 2014. Therefore, the proposed changes to Certificate of the United States Postal Service, mailers/clients budgeted accordingly Mailing did not include eliminating the Domestic Mail Manual (DMM®) to and any increases would cause the provision of a date stamp (postmark) on implement the changes coincident with customers to mail less, if at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 75, No. 162/Monday, August 23, 2010
    51668 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 162 / Monday, August 23, 2010 / Rules and Regulations AIRAC Date State City Airport FDC No. FDC Date Subject 23–Sep–10 ... MA .... Boston ............................. Gen Edward Lawrence Logan Intl ...... 0/8350 7/15/10 ILS Or LOC Rwy 33L, Amdt 3. [FR Doc. 2010–20395 Filed 8–20–10; 8:45 am] determine the best practices for will place qualifying mailpieces from all BILLING CODE 4910–13–P optimizing FSS implementation and price categories into a separate operation, encourages mailers to prepare combined pool for each individual 5- bundles of flat-size mail to facilitate the digit FSS-scheme combination. Mailers POSTAL SERVICE efficient loading of this mail into the will then prepare bundles of uniform FSS machines. Efficient induction of size from the pieces in the pool. 39 CFR Part 111 mailpieces into FSS requires bundles of Bundles must be identified as a 5-digit flats to be of equal height, in order to scheme presort with an optional Optional Mail Preparation Standards facilitate their placement into the endorsement line (OEL) under 708.7.0. for Flat-Size Mailpieces in FSS Zones standard containers that feed into the OELs used under this option may be FSS induction mechanism. Preparing applied to the top piece of each bundle, AGENCY: TM Postal Service . bundles which can be placed easily into unless otherwise required to be placed ACTION: Final rule. these containers improves efficiency in on each piece by other standards. All loading containers and ensures stability pieces for each combined mailpiece SUMMARY: The Postal ServiceTM is and ease of transport of mailer-prepared pool must be prepared in bundles of revising the Mailing Standards of the containers.
    [Show full text]
  • DMM 608 Postal Information and Resources
    Postal Information and Resources: About the DMM 608 608.1.4 608 Postal Information and Resources Overview 1.0 About the Domestic Mail Manual 2.0 Domestic Mail 3.0 Post Offices and Holidays 4.0 Philatelic (Stamp Collecting) Services 5.0 Private Express Statutes 6.0 Complaints and Postal Law Violations 7.0 Trademarks and Copyrights of the USPS 8.0 USPS Contact Information 9.0 Postal Zones 10.0 Forms of Identification 1.0 About the Domestic Mail Manual 1.1 Content of the DMM Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) contains the basic standards of the United States Postal Service (USPS) governing its domestic mail services; descriptions of the mail classes and extra services and conditions governing their use; and standards for price eligibility and mail preparation. Domestic mail is classified by size, weight, content, service, and other factors. 1.2 Copies of the DMM The DMM is available online on Postal Explorer (pe.usps.com). Copies of the DMM may be inspected during normal business hours at USPS Headquarters; area and district offices. A copy is also filed at the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration. 1.3 Revisions to the DMM USPS may change the standards in the DMM. Substantive revisions are published in the Postal Bulletin and, when appropriate, the Federal Register. 1.4 Terms in the DMM Terms in the DMM referring to the singular also apply to the plural, unless the context indicates otherwise. The term postmaster also applies to an officer-in-charge and, in district host cities, to the district manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Participants
    Conference Participants Item Type Proceedings; text Citation Conference participants. Radiocarbon, 40(1), ix-xxvi (1998). DOI 10.1017/S003382220001780X Publisher Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona Journal Radiocarbon Rights Copyright © by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona. All rights reserved. Download date 28/09/2021 13:09:18 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/655088 CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS Anita T. Aerts Nathalie Asselman Centrum voor Isotopen Onderzoek Department of Physical Geography Nijenborgh 4 Utrecht University 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands P.O. Box 80.115 Tel: +31 50 363 4760; Fax: +31 50 363 4738 NL-3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +31 30 253 2167; Fax: +31 30 254 0604 E-mail: [email protected] Cees Alderliesten R. J. van de Graaff Laboratorium Edouard Bard Rijksuniv. Universit6 d'Aix-Marseille III Postbus 80.000 CEREGE, EuropSle de l'Arbois NL-3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands B.P. 80 Tel: +31 30 253 2238; Fax: +31 30 251 8689 13545 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 4, France Tel: +33 442971561; Fax: +33 442971549 Janet Ambers E-mail: [email protected] Department of Scientific Research British Museum Eunjoo Barg Great Russell Street Korea Basic Science Institute London, WC1B 3DG, England 126-16 Anam-Dong, Seoungbuk-ku Tel: +44 171 232 8332; Fax: +44 171 323 8276 136-701 Seoul, Korea [email protected] Tel: +82-2-920-0741; Fax: +82-2-920 0708 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Research – Eastern Europe Fresh Flowers in the Czech
    . Market Research – Eastern Europe Fresh flowers in the Czech Republic .......... Proexport – Colombia Equipo de Trabajo Dirección de Información Comercial Jorge Luis Gutiérrez – Director Fernando Piñeros – Subdirector Proyectos Especiales Bibiana Gutiérrez – Analista de Inteligencia de Mercados [email protected] www.proexport.gov.co www.proexport.com.co Calle 28 No. 13ª – 15, Piso 35 Tel: (571) 5600100 Fax: (571) 5600118 Bogotá, Colombia GRUPO CONSULTOR EUNITE, Nederland Todos los derechos reservados. Ni la totalidad ni parte de este documento puede reproducirse o transmitirse por ningún procedimiento electrónico o mecánico, incluyendo fotocopias, impresión o grabación. Estimado Empresario: La búsqueda de acuerdos comerciales que nos permitan como país ampliar los escenarios y mercados de exportación, nos reta como PROEXPORT a apoyar en forma directa a los empresarios en sus iniciativas exportadoras, ofreciendo servicios dentro de un modelo del gestión comercial y compartiendo un conocimiento más detallado sobre los mercados y sus oportunidades. Para lograr lo anterior, PROEXPORT, con inversión de recursos propios y de cooperación técnica no-reembolsables del BID-FOMIN, emprendió una labor de recolección y análisis de información de primera mano en los principales mercados de interés a través de la contratación de consultorías internacionales especializadas en investigaciones de mercados. Los resultados de estos trabajos permitieron analizar y conocer la dinámica comercial de los sectores en los cuales existe un potencial para
    [Show full text]