DOCSLIB.ORG

Sun Has Torn Into Ed Miliband Even More Viciously Than It Hit Neil Kinnock

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Sun has torn into Ed Miliband even more viciously than it hit Neil Kinnock Exclusive: Research finds 95% of tabloid’s editorials in runup to election have been anti-Labour, with most of those directly vilifying the Labour leader The Sun in 1992 (left) and 2015. The Media Standards Trust said 77% of the tabloid’s leaders were anti-Miliband, against 44% that were deemed anti-Kinnock in 1992 John Plunkett and Ami Sedghi Wednesday 6 May 2015 16.06 AESTLast modified on Thursday 7 May 201502.11 AEST The Sun has been more virulently opposed to the Labour party and its leader Ed Miliband than it was in the runup to the 1992 election when Neil Kinnock was famously portrayed in a lightbulb on polling day, a study shows. Research by the Media Standards Trust found that 95% of the leader columns in Rupert Murdoch’s tabloid were anti-Labour ahead of Thursday’s general election, compared with 79% that were judged anti-Labour in 1992. Sun leader partisanship, 1992 v 2015 The Sun’s claim after the 1992 election in which John Major beat Neil Kinnock The research came as David Axelrod, the American political consultant and Obama adviser who has been working for Labour during this campaign, said that the Tory press in the UK is more powerful and “much more aggressive” than Fox News in the US. The Media Standards Trust found 77% of the News UK paper’s leaders were anti- Miliband, against 44% that were deemed anti-Kinnock in 1992, when the paper was edited by Kelvin MacKenzie and told its readers: “If Kinnock wins today will the last person to leave Britain please turn out the lights.” The paper later claimed “It’s the Sun wot won it” after John Major’s Conservatives beat Kinnock. In its analysis of leader columns from 26 March to 3 May this year, the Media Standards Trust, a research body and thinktank, said 37 out of 39 Sun leaders were anti-Labour, with 30 of them anti-Miliband. This compares with 1992, when it said 31 out of 39 leaders were anti-Labour, with 17 of them anti-Kinnock. Of the same 39 leader columns in the Sun, the Media Standards Trust said 18 of them (46%) were in favour of David Cameron’s Conservatives, against 33% that were pro- Tory in 1992. Rupert Murdoch is said to have berated journalists on the Sun for not doing enough to stop Labour winning the election and warned of the consequences of a Miliband win for the future of News UK. Miliband has said he will take action against the amount of power wielded by Murdoch in a review of rules regulating media ownership in the UK. A Sun leader on 24 April claimed that the threat to Murdoch’s empire was a “direct result” of the Sun switching support to the Conservatives and that “during all the years the Sun backed them … Labour said nothing about the size of our company”. Recent Sun leaders have been headlined “Fork-ed tongue”, “Shameful Mili” and “Lefty stitch-up”. Another was headlined “Tartan peril” although the paper supported the Scottish National party in its Scottish edition while backing the Conservatives elsewhere. The Sun serves Ed Miliband a last helping of abuse The Media Standards Trust also looked at leader articles across all of the national newspapers. The total number of pro-Conservative leaders (217) was more than double the pro- Labour aggregate (87). The Daily Telegraph had most pro-Tory leaders with 55; the Daily Mail had 49, the Daily Express 36, the Sun 35 and the Times 34. Only the Daily Mirror (55) and the Guardian (19), hit double figures with pro-Labour leaders, according to the research. The Sun was the toughest on Labour with 102 critical leaders, followed by the Daily Mail (75) and the Telegraph (67). The Sun, the Times and the Daily Mail were most critical of the Scottish National party, topped by 21 in the Sun. The Media Standards Trust found only one pro-SNP leader, in the Financial Times. The Mirror had the most leaders (109) deemed anti-Conservative, followed by the Guardian (44). The Daily Express, whose owner Richard Desmond has donated £1.3m to Ukip, ran the most leaders in favour of Nigel Farage’s party, with 11. Axelrod said in his interview with Michael Goldfarb from Politico: “I do think the parties approach media as partisan players. So you see parties disseminating messages through the print media in a way that is unusual ... “Here there are relationships between the parties and media outlets that are deeper so you see a lot of themes being previewed in the media in a way that you don’t see in the States.” .
Recommended publications
  • Why Journalism Matters a Media Standards Trust Series

    Why Journalism Matters a Media Standards Trust Series

    Why Journalism Matters A Media Standards Trust series Lionel Barber, editor of the Financial Times The British Academy, Wednesday 15 th July These are the best of times and the worst of times if you happen to be a journalist, especially if you are a business journalist. The best, because our profession has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to report, analyse and comment on the most serious financial crisis since the Great Crash of 1929. The worst of times, because the news business is suffering from the cyclical shock of a deep recession and the structural change driven by the internet revolution. This twin shock has led to a loss of nerve in some quarters, particularly in the newspaper industry. Last week, during a trip to Colorado and Silicon Valley, I was peppered with questions about the health of the Financial Times . The FT was in the pink, I replied, to some surprise. A distinguished New York Times reporter remained unconvinced. “We’re all in the same boat,” he said,”but at least we’re all going down together.” My task tonight is not to preside over a wake, but to make the case for journalism, to explain why a free press and media have a vital role to play in an open democratic society. I would also like to offer some pointers for the future, highlighting the challenges facing what we now call the mainstream media and making some modest suggestions on how good journalism can not only survive but thrive in the digital age. Let me begin on a personal note.
  • Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons from British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, Llevi@Law.Miami.Edu

    Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons from British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]

    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2015 Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform, 55 Santa Clara L. Rev. 323 (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAMING THE "FERAL BEAST"1 : CAUTIONARY LESSONS FROM BRITISH PRESS REFORM Lili Levi* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introdu ction ............................................................................ 324 I. British Press Reform, in Context ....................................... 328 A. Overview of the British Press Sector .................... 328 B. The British Approach to Newspaper Regulation.. 330 C. Phone-Hacking and the Leveson Inquiry Into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press ..... 331 D. Where Things Stand Now ...................................... 337 1. The Royal Charter ............................................. 339 2. IPSO and IM
  • British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate : Journalists Reporting Journalism

    British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate : Journalists Reporting Journalism

    This is a repository copy of British media coverage of the press reform debate : journalists reporting journalism. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/165721/ Version: Published Version Book: Ogbebor, B. orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-9547 (2020) British media coverage of the press reform debate : journalists reporting journalism. Springer Nature , (227pp). ISBN 9783030372651 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Journalists Reporting Journalism Binakuromo Ogbebor British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Binakuromo Ogbebor British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Journalists Reporting Journalism Binakuromo Ogbebor Journalism Studies The University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK ISBN 978-3-030-37264-4 ISBN 978-3-030-37265-1 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37265-1 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made.
  • The Value of Public Service Media

    The Value of Public Service Media

    The Value of Public Service Media T he worth of public service media is under increasing scrutiny in the 21st century as governments consider whether the institution is a good investment and a fair player in media markets. Mandated to provide universally accessible services and to cater for groups that are not commercially attractive, the institution often con- fronts conflicting demands. It must evidence its economic value, a concept defined by commercial logic, while delivering social value in fulfilling its largely not-for-profit public service mission and functions. Dual expectations create significant complex- The Value of ity for measuring PSM’s overall ‘public value’, a controversial policy concept that provided the theme for the RIPE@2012 conference, which took place in Sydney, Australia. This book, the sixth in the series of RIPE Readers on PSM published by NORDI- Public Service Media COM, is the culmination of robust discourse during that event and the distillation of its scholarly outcomes. Chapters are based on top tier contributions that have been revised, expanded and subject to peer review (double-blind). The collection investi- gates diverse conceptions of public service value in media, keyed to distinctions in Gregory Ferrell Lowe & Fiona Martin (eds.) the values and ideals that legitimate the public service enterprise in media in many countries. Fiona Martin (eds.) Gregory Ferrell Lowe & RIPE 2013 University of Gothenburg Box 713, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden Telephone +46 31 786 00 00 (op.) Fax +46 31 786 46 55 E-mail:
  • Minutes of Proceedings

    Minutes of Proceedings

    House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee Minutes of Proceedings Session 2008–09 Culture, Media and Sport Committee The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Current membership Mr John Whittingdale OBE MP (Conservative, Maldon & East Chelmsford) (Chairman) Janet Anderson MP (Labour, Rossendale and Darwen) Mr Nigel Evans MP (Conservative, Ribble Valley) Philip Davies MP (Conservative, Shipley) Paul Farrelly MP (Labour, Newcastle-under-Lyme) Mr Mike Hall MP (Labour, Weaver Vale) Alan Keen MP (Labour, Feltham and Heston) Rosemary McKenna MP (Labour, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) Adam Price MP (Plaid Cymru, Carmarthen East and Dinefwr) Mr Adrian Sanders (Liberal Democrat, Torbay) Helen Southworth (Labour, Warrington South) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/cmscom. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Tracey Garratty (Clerk), Martin Gaunt (Second Clerk), Elizabeth Bradshaw (Inquiry Manager), Anna Wrobel/ Lisa Watkins (Senior Committee Assistants), Ronnie Jefferson (Committee Assistant). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerks of the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6188; the Committee’s email address is [email protected].
  • Anticipated Acquisition by 21St Century Fox, Inc of Sky Plc

    Anticipated Acquisition by 21St Century Fox, Inc of Sky Plc

    Anticipated acquisition by 21st Century Fox, Inc of Sky Plc Provisional findings report Notified: 23 January 2018 © Crown copyright 2018 You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government- licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. The Competition and Markets Authority has excluded from this published version of the provisional findings report information which the inquiry group considers should be excluded having regard to the three considerations set out in section 244 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (specified information: considerations relevant to disclosure). The omissions are indicated by []. [Some numbers have been replaced by a range. These are shown in square brackets.] Contents Page Summary .................................................................................................................... 7 Reference ................................................................................................................... 7 Background ................................................................................................................ 8 The Parties ........................................................................................................... 8 Fox .................................................................................................................
  • The Future of Investigative Journalism

    The Future of Investigative Journalism

    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on Communications 3rd Report of Session 2010–12 The future of investigative journalism Report Ordered to be printed 31 January 2012 and published 16 February 2012 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £14.50 HL Paper 256 The Select Committee on Communications The Select Committee on Communications was appointed by the House of Lords on 22 June 2010 with the orders of reference “to consider the media and the creative industries.” Current Membership Lord Bragg Lord Clement-Jones Baroness Deech Baroness Fookes Lord Gordon of Strathblane Lord Inglewood (Chairman) Lord Macdonald of Tradeston Bishop of Norwich Lord Razzall Lord St John of Bletso Earl of Selborne Lord Skelmersdale Declaration of Interests See Appendix 1. A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests Publications All publications of the Committee are available on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/hlcommunications Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the Committee’s meetings are available at: www.parliamentlive.tv General Information General Information about the House of Lords and its Committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is on the internet at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee Staff The current staff of the Committee are Anna Murphy (Clerk), Alan Morrison (Policy Analyst) and Rita Logan (Committee Assistant). Contact Details All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Select Committee on Communications, Committee Office, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW.
  • Local and Regional Media in the UK

    Local and Regional Media in the UK

    Local and Regional Media in the UK Discussion Document Publication date: 22 September 2009 Main Heading Contents Section Page 1 Executive summary 1 2 Introduction and background 12 3 The local and regional media landscape 19 4 The local and regional media consumer 47 5 The economics of local and regional media 57 6 The role of local and regional journalism 72 7 Sustaining plurality in regionally-based television news 87 8 Opportunities for local TV 102 9 Creating opportunities for sustainable local radio 119 10 Future challenges and opportunities 125 Annex Page 1 Overview of Ofcom’s statutory duties for this report 139 Local and Regional Media in the UK Section 1 1 Executive summary This report stems from our statutory duties1 1.1 Ofcom has statutory duties to secure the availability throughout the United Kingdom of a wide range of television and radio services of high quality and wide appeal and to maintain sufficient plurality of providers of different television and radio services. 1.2 We also have a duty to ensure optimal use of the radio spectrum, including whether and how we make spectrum available for digital terrestrial television (DTT) services. In performing those duties, Ofcom must, among other things, have regard to the different needs and interests of everyone who may wish to use the spectrum for wireless telegraphy, including use of spectrum for local television. 1.3 In carrying out these duties, we have undertaken a series of separate studies to understand the challenges facing the delivery of content to consumers and citizens across the UK, with a particular focus on local content.
  • Leveson's Illiberal Legacy

    Leveson's Illiberal Legacy

    LEVESON’S ILLIBERAL LEGACY AUTHORS HELEN ANTHONY MIKE HARRIS BREAKING SASHY NATHAN PADRAIG REIDY NEWS FOREWORD BY PROFESSOR TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM UNDER ATTACK , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. WHY IS THE FREE PRESS IMPORTANT? 2. THE LEVESON INQUIRY, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 A background to Leveson: previous inquiries and press complaints bodies 2.2 The Leveson Inquiry’s Limits • Skewed analysis • Participatory blind spots 2.3 Arbitration 2.4 Exemplary Damages 2.5 Police whistleblowers and press contact 2.6 Data Protection 2.7 Online Press 2.8 Public Interest 3. THE LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – A LEGAL ANALYSIS 3.1 A rushed and unconstitutional regime 3.2 The use of statute to regulate the press 3.3 The Royal Charter and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 • The use of a Royal Charter • Reporting to Parliament • Arbitration • Apologies • Fines 3.4 The Crime and Courts Act 2013 • Freedom of expression • ‘Provided for by law’ • ‘Outrageous’ • ‘Relevant publisher’ • Exemplary damages and proportionality • Punitive costs and the chilling effect • Right to a fair trial • Right to not be discriminated against 3.5 The Press Recognition Panel 4. THE WIDER IMPACT 4.1 Self-regulation: the international norm 4.2 International response 4.3 The international impact on press freedom 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 6. CONCLUSION 3 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY 4 , LEVESON S ILLIBERAL LEGACY FOREWORD BY TIM LUCKHURST PRESS FREEDOM: RESTORING BRITAIN’S REPUTATION n January 2014 I felt honour bound to participate in a meeting, the very ‘Our liberty cannot existence of which left me saddened be guarded but by the and ashamed.
  • The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) – Five Years On

    The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) – Five Years On

    The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) – Five Years On A reassessment October 2019 Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 IPSO vs the 38 Leveson Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 4 Developments Since 2014 ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Changes to IPSO’s Satisfaction of the Leveson Recommendations................................................................ 8 IPSO Changes Not Affecting Satisfaction of Recommendations ................................................................... 22 Appendix 1– IPSO vs the 38 Recommendations (Detail) ...................................................................... 26 Appendix 2 – The Pilling Review and the Leveson Recommendations .............................................. 37 2 Part 1 – Summary IPSO – A Reassessment Summary This report is a follow-up to the Media Standards Trust’s assessment of the original documentation on a new regulatory system proposed by parts of the UK’s newspaper industry in 2013. The documentation set out the articles1 and regulations2 of the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), as well as the reconfiguration of the previous industry funding body into the Regulatory Funding Company (RFC). The 2013 Media
  • Representation of the News of the World Phone Hacking Scandal And

    Representation of the News of the World Phone Hacking Scandal And

    Representation of the News of the World phone hacking scandal and the Leveson Inquiry: an analysis of the British Press coverage of the debate that arose from the scandal Binakuromo Ogbebor School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies Cardiff University This thesis is submitted to Cardiff University in fulfilment of the requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2018 ii Acknowledgement Representation of the News of the World phone hacking scandal and the Leveson Inquiry is the product of an amazing support network and community. I am glad I have this space to say thank you to all who contributed to the successful completion of my study for a PhD in Journalism Studies at Cardiff University. My sincere thanks go to the School of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies (JOMEC), the major sponsors of this thesis. This thesis is evidence of the great support and care students receive at Cardiff University and especially at JOMEC. Your support spanned academic, economic and social well- being. I shall ever remain grateful to you. Special thanks go to my supervisors, Dr Inaki Garcia-Blanco and Dr Stephen Cushion whose patient tutelage, professional advice and profound support brought me this far. The Director of Post Graduate Research Studies at JOMEC, Professor Paul Bowman was amazing. I appreciate the time you sacrificed to listen to all my requests, questions, complaints etc. and you were quick to provide solutions - thank you very much. I am also indebted to Professor Matt Carlson of Saint Louis University whose inputs on metajournalistic discourse were very useful. My years of working in the teaching teams of Professor Bob Franklin, Professor Justin Lewis, Professor Allan Stuart, Dr John Jewell and Dr Kerry Moore broadened my knowledge and perspectives on research and key academic debates in Journalism Studies, some of which were applied to this thesis.
  • Formal Minutes

    Formal Minutes

    House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee Formal Minutes Session 2008–09 Tuesday 9 December 2008 Members present: Mr John Whittingdale, in the Chair Janet Anderson Rosemary McKenna Philip Davies Adam Price Mr Nigel Evans Mr Adrian Sanders Paul Farrelly Helen Southworth 1. The Licensing Act 2003 Ordered, That the following written evidence relating to the Licensing Act 2003 be reported to the House for publication on the internet: LI 60 The Event Services Association LI 61 Association of Chief Police Officers LI 62 Hamish Birchall, Dr Susan Mallett and Alison Macfarlane LI 64 Association of Circus Proprietors of Great Britain LI 65 Peter Stringfellow LI 66 Philip Doyle LI 67 Roger Gall LI 68 UK Music LI 69 Judith Bramley LI 70 Dr Peter Cripps JP, Secretary, Glosfolk LI 71 British Naturism LI 72 A R Cook 2. BBC Commercial Operations The Committee considered this matter. 3. London 2012 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Lord Coe, Chairman, Paul Deighton, Chief Executive, London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games, John Armitt, Chairman, and David Higgins, Chief Executive, Olympic Delivery Authority, gave oral evidence. Charles Allen, Chairman, Jonathan Edwards, Deputy Chairman, Nations and Regions Group, and Andy Worthington, Chairman, North West Steering Group for the 2012 Games, gave oral evidence. Rt Hon Tessa Jowell MP, Minister for the Olympics, Cabinet Office, and Gerry Sutcliffe MP, Minister for Sport, Department for Culture, Media and Sport, gave oral evidence. [Adjourned till Wednesday 10 December at 2.20 pm. Wednesday 10 December 2008 Members present: Mr John Whittingdale, in the Chair Janet Anderson Mr Mike Hall Philip Davies Rosemary McKenna Mr Nigel Evans Mr Adrian Sanders Paul Farrelly Helen Southworth 1.