The Failure of IPSO

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Failure of IPSO September 2015 hackinginquiry.org The Failure of IPSO After a year in operation, the ‘Independent Press Standards Organisation’ has let everyone down – except the newspapers A Hacked Off report The Failure of IPSO hackinginquiry.org L E A I D F P CONTENts F R Three years ago the Leveson E O S • S Christopher Ware 03 N 70 • O S Falsely accused of murder Inquiry found the country’s I YEARS T E A L F L - U R G Emily Brothers 07 E IPSO does nothing when biggest newspaper groups a paper defies it guilty of ‘wreaking havoc in Linda Pearson 09 Humiliated for an amazing achievement the lives of innocent people’ Traveller wrongly blamed for 11 two deaths The Ebola case that never happened 13 In response to shocking revelations of press The papers made bold promises: fabrication, distortion, bullying, intrusion and The Andy Miller case: the Mail 15 lawlessness, the Inquiry recommended a new allowed to flout the Code model of independent regulation capable of ‘ IPSO will be the toughest regulator in the western effectively enforcing a press code of conduct. world. It will provide real protection for ordinary people What IPSO is not 17 Vitally, the Inquiry ensured this would not restrict affected by media coverage. It will have tough powers freedom of expression. Its recommendations to crack down on wrong-doing to ensure some of the Suicide reporting 1 19 received overwhelming public support and – in things you heard about at the Leveson Inquiry can the form of a Royal Charter – were endorsed never happen again.’ Suicide reporting 2 21 by every party in Parliament. ‘ IPSO will have the power to impose fines of up to £1 The Devil Child 25 The owners of the Express, the Mail, the Mirror, million for systematic wrongdoing; ensure that editors Paying for child stories despite the Sun, the Telegraph and the Times refused to produce upfront corrections where they have got their welfare do what Leveson suggested. Instead they something wrong; have investigative powers, deployed revamped their discredited self-regulator, the by expert investigators, to call editors to account; be Identifying victims of sexual 27 Press Complaints Commission, giving it a new genuinely independent – with an independent Chair abuse & rape name: the Independent Press Standards and Board, and no serving editors anywhere in the Organisation (IPSO). IPSO’s failure to deliver prominent 29 regulatory system; cost the taxpayer or complainants corrections nothing as newspaper publishers will foot the bill.’ So, where do we go from here? 45 IPSO is now a year old. Has it lived up to those promises? Has IPSO raised press standards from their pre-Leveson levels? In these pages you can read the stories of those who know best – people who have found themselves written about in the press and people who took their cases to IPSO IPSO // 02 The Failure of IPSO - Christopher Ware hackinginquiry.org FALSELY ACCUSED OF MURDER 03 // IPSO IPSO // 04 The Failure of IPSO - Christopher Ware hackinginquiry.org IPSO, we were told, would ‘ensure some of Upon reading the British press reports online, FALSELY ACCUSED the things you heard about at the Leveson Christopher realised that many people who OF MURDER Inquiry can never happen again’. Some of knew him must have believed he was genuinely the most shocking evidence at that Inquiry suspected of murder and really had tried to concerned false accusations of murder against escape arrest. Meanwhile, journalists in the UK the parents of Madeleine McCann and against harassed his friends and family in an apparent Bristol schoolteacher Christopher Jefferies. It effort to find ‘dirt’ on him. When – still in shock has happened again, very soon, and on IPSO’s – Christopher reached Heathrow, so many watch. IPSO did nothing. reporters were waiting there that police had to smuggle him out of the airport. At home in Jersey he felt under siege, with reporters THE CORRECTION FACT posting letters through his family’s front door every day seeking interviews. • The ‘Brit’ in these stories could be Christopher Ware is an innocent man. You identified only as Christopher Ware, might think that – especially after the McCann a carpenter from Jersey and Jefferies cases – national newspapers would check their facts carefully and ensure • Christopher Ware killed no one, and their sources of information were sound before Thai authorities never even regarded making an accusation of murder. That is not him as a suspect what happened here. • He cooperated fully with police from the IPSO made no comment on the case and moment they informed him of the murders mounted no investigation. It was left to the victim to sue the Sun for libel: he won modest • He did not ‘flee’ the island by ferry or damages and a tiny correction. This is not the attempt to do so; when he eventually left, kind of ‘upfront correction’ we were told IPSO the police gave him a lift to the ferry would deliver, and it is nothing like enough to deter papers from doing the same again. • At the time these vile accusations against him were published he was in deep shock at the violent death of his closest friend HIS STORY “ What’s scary is that it can In 2014 Christopher Ware was beginning the happen to anyone and holiday of a lifetime with schoolfriend David there’s nothing to stop them. Miller on the Thai island of Koh Tao, when tragedy struck. David and another British It’s taken me and my family packpacker, Hannah Witheridge, were found almost a year to get our murdered on a beach. Thai police quickly lives back on track.” traced Christopher and sought his help in contacting the victims’ families and friends. Christopher Ware He naturally agreed. He was distraught and alone, thousands of miles from home. He was never named or treated as a suspect – on the contrary, Thai police brought him food and cigarettes and did their best to help him cope with the shock. Later, they drove him to the ferry so he could get a flight home. 05 // IPSO IPSO // 06 The Failure of IPSO - Emily Brother’s story - IPSO does nothing when a paper defies it hackinginquiry.org FACT “ IPSO initially ignored our “ The press must avoid prejudicial or pejorative complaint that The Sun reference to an individual’s race, colour, further victimised me and religion, gender, sexual orientation or to any physical or mental illness or disability.” Trans Media Watch. The being blind, Editors’ Code of Practice, clause 12 (i) final adjudication was buried and was printed without a headline. We asked IPSO HER STORY to enforce its own decision but it did nothing.” The willingness and ability of IPSO to protect how did she people from discrimination was tested in the Emily Brothers case of Emily Brothers, a Labour parliamentary candidate at the last election who is blind and Leveson condemned transgender. In December 2014, Rod Liddle the PCC as having used his Sun column to mock her, asking, under a photograph and headline,: ‘Being blind, how did “no powers to stipulate she know she was the wrong sex?’ She replied And then, when it came to fulfilling its obligation the form of resolution to Liddle the next day in the Independent: ‘When to publish the adjudication against it, the Sun then know she that might be offered he turns the lights out, does he not realise he is showed exactly what it thinks of IPSO. It buried by the newspaper a man?’ the article at the bottom of the page, without any headline – even though IPSO had explicitly said in question” With Emily’s endorsement, Trans Media there should be one. In other words, far from IPSO is just the same Watch (TMW), which acts for transgender being ‘upfront’, the paper did all it could to ensure people, complained to IPSO that Liddle’s no one would notice it or read it. IPSO claimed comment was a clear breach of Clause 12:i that it considered the first sentence of the article of the Code. Of course, even IPSO upheld to be its headline. Scan me to watch the the complaint (weirdly claiming that this “no- was the video of Emily telling brainer” was a landmark decision). But then The Editors’ Code says adjudications must be her story, or go to: IPSO, supposedly ‘the toughest regulator in published ‘with due prominence’. It also says www.hackinginquiry.org the western world’, feebly allowed the Sun to that the Code ‘must be honoured not only to make a mockery of the process. the letter but in the full spirit’. Though the Sun had defied its authority and mocked the Code, IPSO First, it IGNORED complaints by TMW that, while did nothing, refusing to act even when TMW the complaint was pending, Liddle and the Sun complained again. wrong sex? mocked and attacked them and Emily Brothers, publicly and privately. This was victimisation – Knowing you could be attacked again, and pure and simple; punishing a complainant in a get no effective redress even when you blatant attempt to intimidate them and to deter “succeed”, would YOU be tempted to bring others from making complaints. a complaint to IPSO? 07 // IPSO IPSO // 08 The Failure of IPSO - Linda Pearson - Humiliated for an amazing achievment hackinginquiry.org HER StoRY A grandmother from Yorkshire, Linda Pearson derogatory and defamatory headline.” IPSO, underwent weight-loss surgery that transformed characteristically, took the paper’s side. Too fat to WASH! her life. She lost 16 stone and was able to First it said that using the word “fat” was climb Snowden to raise money for charity.
Recommended publications
  • Why Journalism Matters a Media Standards Trust Series
    Why Journalism Matters A Media Standards Trust series Lionel Barber, editor of the Financial Times The British Academy, Wednesday 15 th July These are the best of times and the worst of times if you happen to be a journalist, especially if you are a business journalist. The best, because our profession has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to report, analyse and comment on the most serious financial crisis since the Great Crash of 1929. The worst of times, because the news business is suffering from the cyclical shock of a deep recession and the structural change driven by the internet revolution. This twin shock has led to a loss of nerve in some quarters, particularly in the newspaper industry. Last week, during a trip to Colorado and Silicon Valley, I was peppered with questions about the health of the Financial Times . The FT was in the pink, I replied, to some surprise. A distinguished New York Times reporter remained unconvinced. “We’re all in the same boat,” he said,”but at least we’re all going down together.” My task tonight is not to preside over a wake, but to make the case for journalism, to explain why a free press and media have a vital role to play in an open democratic society. I would also like to offer some pointers for the future, highlighting the challenges facing what we now call the mainstream media and making some modest suggestions on how good journalism can not only survive but thrive in the digital age. Let me begin on a personal note.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Mail Letters Email Address
    Daily Mail Letters Email Address statistically.Anurag is quadruplicate If arboraceous and or eff fatuous casually Stevie as optional usually Wardenoverheard follow-through his boscages desultorily overglancing and glancinglyedulcorating or barbotinereclimbing so anxiously ruggedly! and chaffingly, how sterile is Dietrich? Involved Mort profiling some jovialness and saints his Part of the same ads hint, our service was not being reported in favour of corporations own words, daily mail letters Make are to confident the changes. What really my mailing address? When you recall an announcement or just news release, both are acting as a reporter. Senior managers have responsibility for key businesses or functions within this Group. Editing is non existent. ITV show but confessed that maintaining her gym almost resulted in family arguments. ID email yesterday or today. All six months away the royal mail limited evidence of the daily mail letters are responding to do you! Very self to navigate by no pop up adverts! Writers retain rights to stress work after publication. Dial the above number and report in case you ensure not receive three scratch card along with now Daily Mail or The Mail on Sunday. Class Package International Service. The editorial staff have be contacted for printing new title or latest news. Letters become the property probably The Times and team be edited for publication. Such coverage would quickly cover to approximate in Parliament who are petrified both of Brexit and of legislation seen to brazen it. Always be cautious about search you befriend and what you word on social media. Both forms are show through UH Postal Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Can't the Daily Mail Eat Humble Pie Over MMR?
    reBOOKS • CD ROMSviews • ART • WEBSITES • MEDIA • PERSONAL VIEWS • SOUNDINGS ful role of the media in the course of the of guilt over having had their children MMR controversy. immunised. It is true that the MMR-autism scare did Phillips is one of many journalists (by not start in the press. Both a reputable Lon- no means confined to the tabloids) who don teaching hospital and a prestigious have endorsed the anti-MMR campaign. medical journal allowed the scare to start. They have provided a voice for middle class Yet, once Wakefield decided to go public anxieties about environmental threats and Why can’t the Daily with his anti-MMR campaign, the media for the distrust of established sources of played a major part in promoting the scare. authority in science, medicine, and politics Mail eat humble pie Phillips’s response to the Cochrane study that have led some parents to reject MMR. follows the familiar themes of numerous Some journalists, writing as celebrity par- over MMR? anti-MMR articles over the years, including ents, have followed the principles of the several by Phillips herself. “journalism of attachment” popularised in recent military conflicts. This requires a he recent publication of a Cochrane Phillips’s article is scientifically flawed. high level of emotional engagement but no systematic review concluding that She seems to misunderstand the nature of a specialist knowledge of the subject (special- there is “no credible evidence” of a systematic review and to misinterpret any T criticism of studies of MMR safety, or any ist medical and scientific correspondents link between the measles, mumps, and have generally rejected the MMR-autism rubella (MMR) vaccine and either inflamma- expression of uncertainty about their link).
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Material for Chapter 2: Press Regulation Section Numbers from the Book Are Used When Relevant
    Dodd & Hanna: McNae’s Essential Law for Journalists, 24th edition Additional Material for Chapter 2: Press regulation Section numbers from the book are used when relevant. Its content provides fuller explanations and context. 2.1.1 Fragmentation of press regulation A deep concern among the ‘mainstream’ press organisations and many journalists was that Leveson’s proposed regulatory system included an overseeing ‘recognition body’, to be created by statute (and therefore in a form decided by politicians). Leveson’s aim was that this body would decide whether to approve (‘recognise’) any regulator funded by the press, and therefore how the regulator would operate. The idea was that - if recognition was granted - there would be periodic reviews of the regulator’s effectiveness, in terms of promoting standards in journalism, to check if its recognised status remained merited. Leveson did not recommend that such recognition should be compulsory for any regulator the press established. But, as explained below, he designed a legal framework which could financially penalise press organisations – potentially very heavily - if they did not sign up to a ‘recognised’ regulator. Critics of the recognition concept say it offers potential for future governments to interfere with press freedom, by exercising influence through the role of, or powers granted to, the recognition body—for example, by giving it powers to insist that a regulator, to retain recognition, impose tighter rules on the press, with harsh penalties for breaching them. Supporters say that such ‘recognition’ oversight can help ensure that a recognised regulator is completely independent, in its decisions on complaints against the press, of any press group funding it.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report on the BBC 2019/20
    Ofcom’s Annual Report on the BBC 2019/20 Published 25 November 2020 Raising awarenessWelsh translation available: Adroddiad Blynyddol Ofcom ar y BBC of online harms Contents Overview .................................................................................................................................... 2 The ongoing impact of Covid-19 ............................................................................................... 6 Looking ahead .......................................................................................................................... 11 Performance assessment ......................................................................................................... 16 Public Purpose 1: News and current affairs ........................................................................ 24 Public Purpose 2: Supporting learning for people of all ages ............................................ 37 Public Purpose 3: Creative, high quality and distinctive output and services .................... 47 Public Purpose 4: Reflecting, representing and serving the UK’s diverse communities .... 60 The BBC’s impact on competition ............................................................................................ 83 The BBC’s content standards ................................................................................................... 89 Overview of our duties ............................................................................................................ 96 1 Overview This is our third
    [Show full text]
  • Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons from British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository Articles Faculty and Deans 2015 Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform Lili Levi University of Miami School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/fac_articles Part of the Communications Law Commons, and the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Lili Levi, Taming the "Feral Beast": Cautionary Lessons From British Press Reform, 55 Santa Clara L. Rev. 323 (2015). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Deans at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAMING THE "FERAL BEAST"1 : CAUTIONARY LESSONS FROM BRITISH PRESS REFORM Lili Levi* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introdu ction ............................................................................ 324 I. British Press Reform, in Context ....................................... 328 A. Overview of the British Press Sector .................... 328 B. The British Approach to Newspaper Regulation.. 330 C. Phone-Hacking and the Leveson Inquiry Into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press ..... 331 D. Where Things Stand Now ...................................... 337 1. The Royal Charter ............................................. 339 2. IPSO and IM
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Journalists' Interests
    REGISTER OF JOURNALISTS’ INTERESTS (As at 14 June 2019) INTRODUCTION Purpose and Form of the Register Pursuant to a Resolution made by the House of Commons on 17 December 1985, holders of photo- identity passes as lobby journalists accredited to the Parliamentary Press Gallery or for parliamentary broadcasting are required to register: ‘Any occupation or employment for which you receive over £795 from the same source in the course of a calendar year, if that occupation or employment is in any way advantaged by the privileged access to Parliament afforded by your pass.’ Administration and Inspection of the Register The Register is compiled and maintained by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Anyone whose details are entered on the Register is required to notify that office of any change in their registrable interests within 28 days of such a change arising. An updated edition of the Register is published approximately every 6 weeks when the House is sitting. Changes to the rules governing the Register are determined by the Committee on Standards in the House of Commons, although where such changes are substantial they are put by the Committee to the House for approval before being implemented. Complaints Complaints, whether from Members, the public or anyone else alleging that a journalist is in breach of the rules governing the Register, should in the first instance be sent to the Registrar of Members’ Financial Interests in the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Where possible the Registrar will seek to resolve the complaint informally. In more serious cases the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards may undertake a formal investigation and either rectify the matter or refer it to the Committee on Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Mail {Main} Edition: Date: Thursday 17, October 2019 Page: 17,18
    Media: Daily Mail {Main} Edition: Date: Thursday 17, October 2019 Page: 17,18 A study claims 1978 was Britain’s unhappiest year. What rot, says ROGER LEWIS – from Brucie on the box to seven-pintp tins of beer it was... NineteenNineteen seventyty GREAT! by Roger Lewis Few ventured far for their holidays. Weymouth, Margate and Bridlington HAT strikes me is had yet to be eclipsed by the Balearics. how innocent it all Eating out meant scampi and chips in was. If we drank a basket, an egg burger at a Wimpy with the squeezy, tomato-shaped ketchup Mateus Rose, the dispenser and somehow cake tasted bottles were turned different when it was called Black Forest WWinto lampshades.W Gateau at a Berni Inn. Few ventured far for their holidays. COPYRIGHT: This cutting is reproduced by Gorkana under licence from the NLA, CLA or other copyright owner. No further copying (including the printing of digital cuttings), digital reproduction or forwarding is permitted except under license from the NLA, www.nla.co.uk (for newspapers) CLA, www.cla.co.uk (for books and magazines) or other copyright body. Article Page 1 of 5 A23794 - 1 N N s Media: Daily Mail {Main} Edition: Date: Thursday 17, October 2019 Page: 17,18 Gateau at a Berni Inn. I remember Valerie Singleton in I’m talking, of course, about 1978, the the early Seventies dressed up as year a new study tells us was the most a Bronte to show us around miserable for two centuries. Professors Haworth Parsonage. at Warwick University seem to base There was no loudness and brash their findings on the fact that dwindling f silliness, as today on CBeebies.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Mail Online
    17/10/2019 A study may claim 1978 was Britain's unhappiest year, but ROGER LEWIS says 'what rot' | Daily Mail Online Privacy Policy Feedback Thursday, Oct 17th 2019 9AM 13°C 12PM 13°C 5-Day Forecast Home News U.S. Sport TV&Showbiz Australia Femail Health Science Money Video Travel DailyMailTV Discounts Login Nineteen seventy GREAT! A study may Site Web Enter your search claim 1978 was Britain's unhappiest Like Follow Daily Mail Daily Mail year, but ROGER LEWIS says 'what rot' Follow Follow @DailyMail Daily Mail as he remembers Brucie on the box Follow Follow and seven-pint tins of beer @MailOnline Daily Mail By ROGER LEWIS FOR THE DAILY MAIL PUBLISHED: 22:20, 16 October 2019 | UPDATED: 23:15, 16 October 2019 51 486 shares View comments What strikes me is how innocent it all was. If we drank Mateus Rose, the bottles were turned into lampshades. DON'T MISS Few ventured far for their holidays. Weymouth, Margate and Bridlington had yet to Ryan Reynolds shares be eclipsed by the Balearics. first snap of his third child with Blake Lively in sweet family photo... Eating out meant scampi and chips in a basket, an egg burger at a Wimpy with the and seemingly reveals squeezy, tomato-shaped ketchup dispenser and somehow cake tasted different baby's gender So happy when it was called Black Forest Gateau at a Berni Inn. Strictly's Kelvin I’m talking, of course, about 1978, the year a new study tells us was the most Fletcher reveals 12-hour dance rehearsals, 5am miserable for two centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDER DENYING MEDIA CREDENTIALS V
    27-CR-20-12646 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 3/24/2021 3:27 PM STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MEDIA CREDENTIALS v. Court File No. 27-CR-20-12646 Derek Michael Chauvin, Defendant. On May 25, 2020, George Floyd died while being subdued and taken into custody by Minneapolis Police officers. Within hours of his arrest and death, cell-phone video of the incident was posted to social media and spread widely and quickly across the internet. Public anger over Mr. Floyd’s death—fueled and informed by the cell-phone video—sparked days of civil unrest in the Twin Cities, ranging from massive peaceful protests and marches to widespread property damage. This outpouring of public grief and anger was not unique to Minnesota: protests and marches related to Mr. Floyd’s death occurred across the United States and throughout the world. Mr. Floyd’s death received intense and sustained coverage in the local, national, and international press. In the days following Mr. Floyd’s death, prosecutors brought criminal charges against the four former Minneapolis Police officers involved in the incident: Derek Chauvin, Thomas Lane, J. Alexander Kueng, and Tou Thao. As part of pre-trial litigation in these cases, counsel for Thomas Lane filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Probable Cause on July 7, 2020. Lane attached a number of exhibits in support of his Motion, including video footage from Lane’s and Kueng’s body-worn cameras 1 27-CR-20-12646 Filed in District Court State of Minnesota 3/24/2021 3:27 PM showing parts of the officers’ interactions with Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate : Journalists Reporting Journalism
    This is a repository copy of British media coverage of the press reform debate : journalists reporting journalism. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/165721/ Version: Published Version Book: Ogbebor, B. orcid.org/0000-0001-5117-9547 (2020) British media coverage of the press reform debate : journalists reporting journalism. Springer Nature , (227pp). ISBN 9783030372651 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Journalists Reporting Journalism Binakuromo Ogbebor British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Binakuromo Ogbebor British Media Coverage of the Press Reform Debate Journalists Reporting Journalism Binakuromo Ogbebor Journalism Studies The University of Sheffield Sheffield, UK ISBN 978-3-030-37264-4 ISBN 978-3-030-37265-1 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37265-1 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made.
    [Show full text]