Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 62
1 ELLEN M. MAHAN 2 i Deputy Section Chief Environmental Enforcement Section 3 Environment and Natural Resources Division 4 U.S. Department of Justice
5 JAMES R. MacAYEAL (D.C. Bar # 474664) Senior Counsel 6 Environmental Enforcement Section United States Department of Justice, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 a j amie.macayeal@usdoj. gov 9 E io LIZABETH A. STRANGE Acting United States Attorney ~~ JANET K. MARTIN(AZ BAR # 6014) is Civil Chief District Arizona 13 405 W. Congress Street, Suite 4800 14 Tucson, AZ 85701-5040 (520)620-7300 15 j [email protected] 16 ~~ Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America
is IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ao al UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, as Plaintiff, 23
24 Civil Action No.
25 CONSENT DECREE (Proposed) 26 APACHE NITROGEN PRODUCTS, ; ~C.~ 27
~8 Defendant. Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 2 of 62
1
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 I. JURISDICTION AND VENiJE ...... 6 4 II. DEFINITIONS ...... 7 5 III. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ...... 12 6 IV. CIVIL PENALTY ...... 14 V. PERIODIC REPORTING ...... 15 s VI. REVIEW OF SUBMITTALS ...... 16 9 VII. STIPULATED PENALTIES ...... 16 io VIII. RIGHT OF ENTRY ...... 18 ~~ IX. FORCE MAJEURE ...... 18 is X. DISPUTE RESOLUTION ...... 20 13 XI. NOTIFICATION ...... 23 14 XII. EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/RESERVATION OF RIGHTS .....26 15 XIII. COSTS ...... 27 16 XIV. TERMINATION ...... 27 ~~ XV. MISCELLANEOUS ...... 28 is
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 3 of 62
WI~REAS,Plaintiff United States of America on behalf of the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (the "United States") has concurrently
filed a civil action against Defendant Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc.("ANP") for
civil penalties and injunctive relief based on alleged violations of the Clean Air
("CAA"),42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., and the Implementation Plan for the State of
Arizona ("SIP") approved by EPA pursuant to the CAA;
WHEREAS,the civil action relates to a nitric acid production unit owned
nd a operated by ANP near Saint David, Arizona (the "ANP facility"), referred to as AOP-4;
WI~REAS, AOP-4 is a dual pressure, Chemico Design nitric acid
production unit commissioned in the 1970s that uses refrigerated extended
absorption and hydrogen peroxide injection during startup for purposes of nitrogen
oxide("NO X")emissions control;
WHEREAS,the United States alleges that the ANP facility has violated the
CAA and the Arizona SIP by commencing construction of a major modification
project at AOP-4 without having undergone a Prevention of Significant
Deterioration ("PSD")review by the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality ("ADEQ"), the appropriate permitting authority under the Arizona SIP, in order to obtain a permit;
3 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 4 of 62
WHEREAS,the United States also alleges that ANP failed to comply with
ongoing requirements for emissions reporting, in violation of federal regulations
promulgated under Section 111 of the CAA,42 U.S.C. § 7411, dealing with New
Source Performance Standards (the "NSPS program"), specifically 40 CFR Part 60
Subpart G (the "Applicable NSPS");
WHEREAS, ANP performed an evaluation of the installation and operation
of Selective Catalytic Reduction ("SCR") as a NOX abatement("DeNO X")system
for AOP-4 and concluded that the additional back pressure could result in
catastrophic failure of AOP-4's turbine;
WHEREAS,the parties have agreed that ANP will enter into a contract with
Thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. ("TKI") to conduct an Alternative
N OX Reduction Technical Feasibility Study on AOP-4 as described in Appendix A
to this Consent Decree to provide information on the technical feasibility and the
associated risks on process and equipment reliability of NOX abatement
alternatives for AOP-4;
WHEREAS,the parties have agreed that ANP will enter into a contract with TKI within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, under which TKI will develop a working process simulation model for the AOP-4 process, identifying additional locations for sampling points and instrumentation necessary to refine the simulation;
4 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 5 of 62
1 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the contract will require TKI to 2 provide this feedback to ANP such 3 that ANP can install the appropriate monitoring
4 equipment and provide necessary information to complete the study; 5 WHEREAS,the parties have agreed that the contract 6 will rewire TKI to evaluate two SCR control technologies for suitability and utilize the process s simulation model to simulate addition of such potential DeNOx technologies to 9
io determine viability;
~~ WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the contract will require TKI iz develop a budgetary design and proposal 13 for the appropriate alternative DeN
14 system, including budgetary cost estimate and to evaluate the installation of a 15 and post expander as well as the potential for use of a bypass stack; 16 WHEREAS, ~~ the parties have agreed that the contract will require TKI 18 develop an AOP-4 Study Report on the technical feasibility and the associ 19 risks on process and zo equipment reliability of the NOx abatement alternatives; zi WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that ANP shall include the AOP-4 22 Study Report as part of an AOP-4 Best Available Control 23 Technology("BACT")
24 Analysis, which shall be included as part of an application to ADEQ requesting an 25 AOP-4 BACT Determination; 26 WI~REAS, a~ the parties have agreed that in the event ADEQ's determinati as identifies an appropriate alternative NOx control technology for AOP-4, ANP shall
5 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 6 of 62
submit an application to ADEQ requesting authorization to install and operate such
control technology to continue operation of AOP-4;
WHEREAS, ANP does not admit any liability arising out of the acts or
omissions alleged in the Complaint or in this Consent Decree;
WHEREAS,the Parties agree that the United States' filing of the Complaint
and entry into this Consent Decree constitute diligent prosecution by the United
States, under Section 304(b)(1)(B) of the CAA,42 U.S.C. § 7604(b)(1)(B), of all
matters alleged in the Complaint and addressed by this Consent Decree through
date of lodging of this Consent Decree;
WHEREAS,the Parties have agreed that settlement of the civil claims
alleged in the Complaint is in the public interest and that entry of this Consent
Decree without further litigation is the most appropriate way to resolve the
allegations in the Complaint;
NOW,THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:
I. JURISDICTION, VENUE AND PARTIES BOUND
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and the
Parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345, 1355, and 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b).
2. Venue is proper in the District of Arizona pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1395 and 42 U.S.C. § 7413(b).
6 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 7 of 62
3. Notice of the commencement of this action has been given to the State of Arizona.
4. ANP consents to and shall not challenge entry of this Consent Decree nor shall ANP challenge this Court's jurisdiction to enter, enforce, modify, or terming
this Consent Decree.
5. This Consent Decree shall apply to and be binding upon ANP and its successors, and assigns, and upon the United States.
6. If ANP conveys the ANP facility or transfers a lease interest in the ANP facility to athird-party, or if ANP contracts with athird-party to operate all or part of the ANP facility on ANP's behalf, ANP shall give written notice of this Consent Decree to any successor in interest or any contract operator before executing such conveyance or contract. ANP shall send a copy of such written notification to the
United States prior to the closing of such conveyance, transfer or operator a greement, and ANP shall attach a copy of this Consent Decree to any final agreement executed with such third-party. Transfer of ANP's ownership of the ANP facility or its lease interest in the ANP facility, or any contract with a third-party, will not relieve ANP from any obligation in the Consent Decree, or the payment of civil or stipulated penalties required under this Consent Decree.
II. DEFIl~TITIONS
7. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, terms used in this Consent Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 8 of 62
Decree that are defined in the CAA and in regulations promulgated thereunder a shall have the meaning assigned 3 to them in the statutes or in such regulations.
4 Whenever terms listed below are used in this Consent Decree or in the Appendices 5 attached hereto and incorporated hereunder, the following definitions shall apply: 6
a. "Alternative NOX Reduction Technical Feasibility Study on AOP- s 4" or "AOP-4 Study" shall mean the study described in Appendix A, which is a 9 proposal io by TKI to ANP detailing the terms and conditions of the study. The ~~ reference in Appendix A, Section 2.2., to EPA's proposed SCR control strategy 12 means the strategy entitled "Proposed Design and Location 13 of SCR" dated April
14 21, 2017 detailed in Appendix B to this Consent Decree.
15 b. "AOP-4 Study Report" shall mean the report generated by the 16
~~ contractor performing the AOP-4 Study that describes the results of the AOP-4 is Study on the technical feasibility and the associated risks on process and 19 equipment reliability zo of the NOx abatement alternatives, including the NOX
zi control strategy described in Appendix B.
22 c. "ANP facility" shall mean the nitric acid plant owned and 23
24 operated by Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc., near Saint David, Arizona.
25 d. "AOP-4" shall mean the dual pressure nitric acid production plant 26 at the ANP '2 facility.
za e. "ADEQ" shall mean the Arizona Department of Environmental
s Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 9 of 62
1 Quality. z f. "AOP-4 BACT 3 Analysis" shall mean an analysis prepared by
4 ANP to identify and assess alternative NOX control technologies for AOP-4. Any 5 such analysis shall consider technical feasibility; energy, environmental, and 6
economic impacts; and other costs consistent with Chapter B of EPA's "New a Source Review Workshop Manual—Prevention of Significant Deterioration and 9 Nonattainment io Area Permitting,"(Draft October 1990)(hereinafter "EPA NSR ~~ Manual"), but shall not include any other elements ofPSD permitting 12 (notwithstanding any reference in Chapter B). 13 The analysis shall, at a minimum,
14 include evaluation of the alternative NOX control technologies considered in the 15 AOP-4 Study as described in Appendix A to this Consent Decree. 16 ~~ g. "AOP-4"BACT Determination" shall mean the conclusion
ie reached by ADEQ after reviewing ANP's AOP-4 BACT Analysis, including the 19 identification of an ao appropriate alternative NOX control technology, if any, for ai installation and operation at AOP-4. Such determination shall be based on z2 consideration of technical feasibility; energy, environmental, and economic 23
24 impacts; and other costs consistent with Chapter B of EPA's NSR Manual, but 25 shall not include any other elements ofPSD permitting (notwithstanding any 26 reference in Chapter B); 2~ and any other information ADEQ believes is appropriate. as Such determination shall become final for purposes of this Consent Decree upon
9 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 10 of 62
ANP's e~austion of any right to administrative or judicial review of the final
decision under Arizona law. For purposes of the BACT Determination and the
determination of any emissions limit for AOP-4,the applicable NSPS shall be 40
CFR Part 60 Subpart G.
h. "CAA" shall mean the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§ 7401 et seq.
i. "Consent Decree" shall mean this Decree and any appendices attached hereto. In the event of conflict between this Decree and the Appendices, t his Decree shall control, except as to the details of the AOP-4 Study.
j. The term "day" shall mean a calendar day unless expressly stated
to be a working day.
k. "Effective Date" shall be the date of entry of this Consent Decree by the Court.
1. "EPA" shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency and any successor departments or agencies of the United States.
m. "Force majeure" shall mean any event that arises from causes beyond the control of ANP, of any of ANP's agents, contractors, consultants or any other entity within the control of ANP that delays or prevents the performance of any obligation under this Consent Decree despite ANP's best efforts to fulfill the obligation. "Best efforts" includes anticipating any potential force majeure
io Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 11 of 62
event and addressing the effects of any such event(a) as it is occurring and (b) after it has occurred, to prevent or minimize any resulting delay to the greatest
extent possible. "Force Majeure" does not include ANP's financial inability to
perform any obligation under this Consent Decree.
n. "Interest" shall mean the statutory rate applicable to judgments, 2~ U.S.C. § 1961.
o. "NOX"shall mean all oxides of nitrogen except nitrous oxide
("N2 O").
p. "Paragraph" shall mean a portion of this Consent Decree
identified by an Arabic numeral.
q. "Parties" shall mean the United States and ANP.
r. "Plaintiff' shall mean the United States.
s. "Replacement Contractor" shall mean the contractor selected by
ANP and approved by EPA to complete the AOP-4 Study and AOP-4 Study R eport if the previously approved contractor cannot or will not perform the work for any reason within the required deadline.
t. "Section" shall mean a portion of this Consent Decree identified by a roman numeral.
u. "SCR" shall mean selective catalytic reduction, which is a type of air pollution control technology that reduces emissions of NOX.
~~ Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 12 of 62
v. "SIP" shall mean the Arizona State Implementation Plan as
approved by EPA under the Clean Air Act.
w. "United States" shall mean the United States of America,
including all of its departments, agencies, and instrumentalities, which includes
without limitation EPA,the Settling Federal Agencies and any federal natural
resources trustee.
x. "Working day" shall mean a day other than a Saturday, Sunday,
Federal holiday. In computing any period of time under this Consent Decree,
where the last day would fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the
period shall run until the close of business of the next working day.
III. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
8. Within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date, ANP shall enter into a
contract with TKI to commence and complete performance of the AOP-4 Study,
and to provide an AOP-4 Study Report to ANP and EPA, within eighteen (18)
months of the Effective Date. ANP shall use best efforts to provide information
described in Appendix A that is necessary for TKI to complete the AOP-4 Study,
and to enforce its contractual rights to ensure the vendor completes the AOP-4
Study as described in Appendix A. In the event ANP determines that TKI cannot or will not perform the AOP-4 Study as described in Appendix A, ANP shall provide notice to EPA of that determination in the progress reports required by
12 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 13 of 62
1 Section V and shall select a Replacement Contractor to perform a comparable 2 study. Upon EPA's approval of the 3 Replacement Contractor, ANP shall enter into
4 a contract with Replacement Contractor to complete the comparable study and 5 associated report within eighteen (18) months of EPA's approval. b 9 . Within ninety (90) days of receipt of the AOP-4 Study Report(or report s for any comparable study approved by EPA), ANP shall submit an application to 9 ADEQ requesting io an AOP-4 BACT Determination. ANP's application shall, at a ~~ minimum include an AOP-4 BACT Analysis; a copy of the AOP-4 Study Report is (or report for any comparable study approved 13 by EPA); a copy of this Consent
14 D ecree, including appendices; and a copy of the Complaint filed in this matter. 15 10. Within 180 days of a final AOP-4 BACT Determination that identifies 16 an appropriate alternative ~~ NOX control technology for AOP-4, ANP shall submit a ~8 permit revision application to ADEQ requesting authorization to install and 19 such control technology zo to continue operation of AOP-4. The permit revision ~~ application shall be in the format specified by ADEQ and shall request a z2 continuously achievable emissions limit consistent with the final AOP-4 23 BACT Determination. 24 ANP shall then install and operate any such alternative NOx 25 control technology for AOP-4 according to the terms of the permit revision issued 26 by ADEQ. 2~
28
13 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 14 of 62
1 IV. CIVIL PENALTY z 1 1. Within thirty (30) 3 days after the Effective Date of this Consent Decree,
4 or twenty (20) days after receiving payment instructions as described in Paragraph 5 ~ 12, whichever is later, ANP shall pay a civil penalty of six hundred thousand 6 d ollars ($600,000) to the United States. If payment is not made within the due s date, in addition to the civil penalty, ANP shall pay Interest accruing as of the due 9
io date through the date of payment.
~~ 12. Payments under this Consent Decree to the United States shall be made 12 by Electronic Fund Transfer("EFT") to the U.S. Treasury 13 according to current
14 United States EFT procedures. Following the Effective Date of the Consent
15 Decree, current EFT procedures shall be provided to ANP by the Financial 16 ~~ Litigation Unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Arizona. is Concurrently with the EFT, ANP shall fax notice of payment to the person 19 designated as "Point of zo Contact" on the EFT transfer instructions, and shall send zi notice of payment to EPA and the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") at 22 the addresses listed in Section XI (Notification) of this Consent Decree. 23 The notice 24 of payment shall identify:(1) the date and amount of money transferred; 25 (2)the name and address of the transferring bank;(3) this case by name;(4) the 26 civil action number;(5) 27 DOJ # 90-5-2-1-10736;(6) this Consent Decree (including zs the Effective Date); and (7) a description of the reason for the payment(including
14 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 15 of 62
1 the paragraph number of this Consent Decree that is most relevant to the payment). 2 V. PERIODIC 3 REPORTING
4 13. Beginning thirty (30) days after the end of the second full calendar
5 quarter following the entry of this Consent Decree, and continuing on a semi- 6
annual basis until termination of this Consent Decree, and in addition to any other s express reporting requirement in this Consent Decree, ANP shall submit to EPA a 9 progress io report. The progress report shall contain the following information: ~~ a. all requested information necessary to determine compliance 12 with this Consent Decree; and 13
14 b. all information indicating the status of the AOP-4 Study and
15 Study Report, any delay or anticipated delay in completing the AOP-4 Study or the 16 ~~ Study Report, and the steps taken by ANP to mitigate such delay.
is 14. In addition to the progress reports required pursuant to this Section, 19 ANP shall provide a written zo report to Plaintiff of any violation of the requirements
ai of this Consent Decree within fifteen (15) calendar days of when ANP knew or as should have known of any such violation. In this report, ANP shall explain the 23 cause 24 or causes of the violation and all measures taken or to be taken by ANP to
25 prevent such violations in the future. 26 z~ 15. Each ANP report shall be signed by a corporate official with as m anagement responsibility for the subject matter of the notice or report, and shall
15 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 16 of 62
contain the following certification:
This information was prepared either by me or under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my evaluation, or the direction and my inquiry of the persons) who manage the system, or the persons) directly responsible for gathering the information, I hereby certify under penalty of law that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this information is true, accurate, and complete. I understand that there are significant penalties for submitting false, inaccurate, or incomplete information to the United States. to VI. REVIEW OF SUBMITTALS ~l iz 16. ANP shall submit each air quality-related permit application, plan,
13 report, or other submission required by this Consent Decree to EPA, whenever 14 such a document is is required pursuant to this Consent Decree.
16 VII. STIPULATED PENALTIES
17 17. Subject to the Force Majeure provisions of this Consent Decree, is ANP
19 shall be liable for stipulated penalties for failure to comply with the terms and
20 conditions of this Consent Decree of $1,000 per day per violation for the first thi zi as (30) days and $2,500 per day per violation for the thirty first (31St) day and beyond.
23 18. Penalties shall begin to accrue on the day after performance is due or on 24 the day a violation occurs, whichever is applicable, and shall 25 continue to accrue
26 until performance is satisfactorily completed or until the violation ceases.
27 Stipulated Penalties shall accrue simultaneously for separate violations of this 28 Consent Decree. Any stipulated penalty accruing pursuant to this Consent Decree
16 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 17 of 62
1 shall be payable upon demand and due not later than thirty (30) days after ANP's 2 receipt of EPA's written demand. 3 Such demand shall be sent by certified mail.
4 19. If ANP disputes the claimed violation, ANP may initiate the dispute 5 resolution procedures set forth in this Consent Decree. Otherwise, ANP shall 6 pay the Stipulated Penalties. Subject to the Dispute Resolution procedures set forth in s this Consent Decree, Interest shall accrue on unpaid Stipulated Penalties that are 9 due io and owing thirty (30) days after ANP's receipt of EPA's written demand. ~~ Stipulated penalties shall be paid in the same manner as payment of a civil penalty. 12 20. Payment of stipulated penalties for a violation 13 of this Consent Decree
14 shall be in addition to the right of the United States to seek other judicial or
15 a dministrative relief for the violations that led to stipulated penalties. In assessing 16 penalties ~~ during any proceeding for other judicial or administrative relief, a court is or the United States may consider any payment of stipulated penalties already 19 made by ANP. In addition, zo the United States reserves its right to pursue any or all ai relief for any or all violations outside the purview of this Consent Decree. z2 21. The United States may, in the unreviewable exercise of its discretion, 23 reduce 24 or waive Stipulated Penalties otherwise due under this Consent Decree.
25 22. In the case of Dispute Resolution of Stipulated Penalties, the Stipulated 26 P a~ enalties need not be paid until the following: ze a. If the dispute is resolved by agreement or by a decision of EPA that is
i~ Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 18 of 62
not appealed to the Court, ANP shall pay accrued penalties determined to be owing, together with Interest, within thirty (30) days of the effective date ofthe
agreement or the receipt of EPA's decision or order.
b. If the dispute is appealed to the Court and the United States prevails i whole or in part, ANP shall pay all accrued penalties determined by the Court to be
owing, together with Interest, within sixty (60) days of receiving the Court's
decision or order, except as provided in Subparagraph c, below.
c. If any Party appeals the District Court's decision, ANP shall pay any and all accrued penalties determined to be owed, together with Interest, within fifteen (15) days of receiving the final appellate court decision requiring payment of stipulated penalties.
VIII. RIGHT OF ENTRY
23. EPA and its respective contractors, consultants, and agents shall have authority to inspect ANP's facility at all reasonable times, upon proper presentation of credentials. This provision does not apply to areas not owned or under the control of ANP. In addition, this provision in no way limits or otherwise affects any right of entry held by EPA pursuant to applicable federal, state, or local laws, regulations, or permits.
IX. FORCE MAJEURE
24. ANP shall satisfy the requirements of any injunctive relief except to the
~8 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 19 of 62
extent, and for the period of time, that such performance is prevented or delayed a events which constitute a force 3 majeure, as defined above in Section II
4 (Definitions).
5 25. When a force majeure event occurs, the time for performance of 6 the activity delayed by the force majeure shall be extended for the time period of the s d elay attributable to the force majeure. The time for performance of any activity 9 dependent io on the delayed activity shall be similarly extended, except to the extent ~~ that the dependent activity can be implemented in a shorter time. The United is States, through EPA, shall determine whether dependent 13 activities will be delayed
14 by the force majeure and whether the time period should be extended for 15 performance of such activities. ANP shall adopt all reasonable measures to avoid 16 ~~ or minimize any delay caused by a force majeure. ie 26. When an event occurs or has occurred that may delay or prevent the 19 performance of any zo obligation under this Consent Decree, ANP shall provide
21 written notification to the Chief, Air & TRI Section, Enforcement Division of 22 EPA, Region 9, within twenty (20) days of ANP's knowledge of such 23 event. The written 24 notification shall fully describe: the event that may delay or prevent 25 performance; reasons for the delay; whether ANP claims that the delay resulted 26 from an event ~~ which qualifies as a force majeure; the reasons any such delay is zs beyond the reasonable control of ANP; the anticipated duration of the delay;
19 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 20 of 62
1 actions taken or to be taken to prevent or minimize the delay; a schedule for
implementation of any measures to be taken to mitigate 3 the effect of the delay; and
4 the time needed to implement any dependent activities. For purposes of this
5 Section, ANP will be deemed to have known of any circumstance that any of 6 ANP's agents, contractors, consultants, or any other entity within the control of s ANP,knew or should have known. 9
io 27. ANP's failure to comply with the force majeure notice requirements ~~ provided herein for any delay in performance will be deemed an automatic 12 forfeiture of its right to assert that the delay was caused by a force majeure. 13
14 28. After receiving notice from ANP of a force majeure, the United States,
15 through EPA, shall provide written notification to ANP stating whether it agrees 16 ~~ that there was a force majeure event and whether ANP's request for a delay is
is justified. If the United States does not respond to a request for a delay within 19 (30) days, the failure to respond ao may be treated by ANP as a denial of the request. ai If ANP disagrees with the United States' force majeure determination, ANP may zz initiate dispute resolution as set forth in this Consent Decree. 23
24 X. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
25 29. Unless otherwise expressly provided for in this Consent Decree, the 26 Dispute z~ Resolution procedures of this Section shall be the exclusive mechanism to as resolve disputes arising under or with respect to this Consent Decree. With respect
ao Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 21 of 62
1 to any dispute or allegation expressly raised by the United States concerning a ANP's compliance with the Consent Decree, ANP's failure 3 to seek resolution of a
4 dispute under this Section shall preclude ANP from raising any such issue as a
5 defense to an action by the United States to enforce any obligation of ANP arising 6 under this Consent Decree.
a 30. Informal Dispute Resolution. Any dispute subject to Dispute 9 io Resolution under this Consent Decree shall first be the subject of informal ~~ negotiations. The dispute shall be considered to have arisen when a written Notice 12 of Dispute is sent by ANP. Such Notice of Dispute shall state clearly the matter in 13
14 dispute. The period of informal negotiations shall not exceed thirty (30) days from
15 the date the dispute arises, unless that period is modified by written agreement. If 16 ~~ the Parties cannot resolve a dispute by informal negotiations, then the position ie advanced by the United States shall be considered binding unless, within thirty 19 (30) days after the conclusion ao of the informal negotiation period, ANP invokes
21 formal Dispute Resolution procedures as set forth below.
22 31. Formal Dispute Resolution. ANP shall invoke formal Dispute 23
24 Resolution procedures, within the time period provided in the preceding Paragra
25 by serving on the United States a written Statement of Position regarding the 2 6 'I matter a~ in dispute. The Statement of Position shall include, but may not necessarily ae be limited to, any factual data, analysis, or opinion supporting ANP's position and
ai Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 22 of 62
1 any supporting documentation relied upon by ANP. z 32. The United States shall serve its Statement 3 of Position within forty-five
4 (45) days of receipt of ANP's Statement of Position. The Statement of Position of 5 the United States shall include, but may not necessarily be limited to, any factual 6 ~ ~ data, analysis, or opinion supporting that position and any supporting s documentation relied upon by the United States. The United States' Statement of 9 Position io shall be binding on ANP, unless ANP files a motion for judicial review of ~~ the dispute in accordance with the following Paragraph. 12 33. ANP may seek judicial review of the dispute by filing with the 13 Court
14 and serving on the United States, in accordance with the Notice provisions of this
15 Consent Decree, a motion requesting judicial resolution of the dispute. The moti 16 ~~ must be filed within thirty (30) days of receipt of the United States' Statement of is Position pursuant to the preceding Paragraph. The motion shall contain a written 19 statement of ANP's position zo on the matter in dispute, including any supporting ~~ factual data, analysis, opinion, or documentation, and shall set forth the relief z2 requested and any schedule within which the dispute must be resolved for orderly 23
24 implementation of the Consent Decree.
25 34. The United States shall respond to ANP's motion within the time period 26 allowed by the Local 2~ Rules of this Court. ANP may file a reply memorandum, to as the extent permitted by the Local Rules.
z2 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 23 of 62
1 35. In any dispute ANP shall bear the burden of demonstrating that its
position complies with this Consent Decree 3 and that ANP is entitled to relief under
4 applicable law. The United States reserves the right to argue that its position is 5 reviewable only on the administrative record and must be upheld unless arbitrary 6
and capricious or otherwise not in accordance with law. If the United States a invokes this right, the United States shall compile an administrative record of the 9
to dispute containing all Statements of Position, including supporting documentation ~~ and referenced data or information, and ANP shall have the burden of 1a demonstrating, based on the administrative record, that the position 13 of the United
14 States is arbitrary and capricious or otherwise not in accordance with law.
15 36. The invocation of Dispute Resolution procedures under this Section 16 ~~ shall not, by itself, extend, postpone, or affect in any way any obligation of ANP is under this Consent Decree, unless and until the Court so orders. Stipulated 19 Penalties with respect to 20 the disputed matter shall continue to accrue from the first ai day of noncompliance, but payment shall be stayed pending resolution of the as dispute. If ANP does not prevail on the disputed issue, Stipulated Penalties shall 23
24 be assessed and paid as provided in this Consent Decree.
25 XI. NOTIFICATION 26 37. Except 2~ as otherwise specifically stated herein, all notices and as submissions required by this Consent Decree shall be sent by certified mail,
23 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 24 of 62
1 express mail, or similar overnight mail delivery service with return receipt 2 requested. 3
4 38. All notices and reports by ANP shall be signed and affirmed by a 5 corporate official with management responsibility for the subject matter of the 6 notice or report, using the following certification: s I certify that this information was prepared under my direction 9 or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure io that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information to be submitted. Based on my directions and my ~~ inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for 12 obtaining the information to be submitted, I certify that the information is true, accurate, and complete to the 13 best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I am aware that there are 14 significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of 15 fines and imprisonment.
16 All notices and reports submitted to EPA or DOJ shall refer to this Consent ~~ D ie ecree and the date of entry of the Consent Decree, and shall cite the case name of
19 United States v. Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc., the case number, and DOJ # 90- ao 5-2-1-10736. ai az 39. Notices and reports to the United States as required by this Consent 23 Decree shall be submitted to: 24
25 if by regular mail or post office express mail:
26 Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section a~ Environment &Natural Resources Division United as States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611
24 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 25 of 62
Washington, D.C. 20044 7611
if by private overnight mail service:
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section Environment &Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice 601 D St. NW Washington, D.C. 20005
and to:
Allan Zabel(ORC-2) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105
Director, Enforcement Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Attn: Charles Aldred(ENF 2-1)
Director, Air Enforcement Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Mail Code: 2242A Washington, DC 20460
Notices to ANP as required by this Consent Decree shall be submitted to: Jeremy Barrett President &General Manager Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc. 1436 S. Apache Powder Rd., St. David, AZ 85630 Mail: P.O. Box 700, Benson, AZ 85602 [email protected]
25 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 26 of 62
and to:
Chris Leason Gallagher &Kennedy,PA 2575 East Camelback Road Suite 1100 Phoenix, AZ 85016 [email protected]
XII. EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/RESERVATION OF RIGHTS
40. Entry of this Consent Decree and compliance with the requirements herein shall resolve and shall be in full settlement and satisfaction of the civil claims of the United States against ANP as alleged in the Finding and Notice of
Violation, dated July 23, 2012, and the Complaint concurrently filed in this action through the lodging of this Consent Decree.
41. Except as specifically provided herein, the United States does not waive any rights or remedies available to it for violation by ANP of federal or state laws or regulations. This Consent Decree shall in no way affect the United States' ability to bring future actions for any claims not alleged in the Complaint or the
Finding and Notice of Violation, dated July 23, 2012, in this case or for claims subject to an express reservation. This Consent Decree does not relieve ANP of any criminal liability.
42. This Consent Decree in no way affects ANP's responsibilities to comply with all federal, state, or local laws and regulations.
26 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 27 of 62
43. This Consent Decree does not limit or affect the rights of ANP or of the
United States against any third parties, not party to this Consent Decree, nor does it
limit the rights of third parties, not parties to this Consent Decree, against ANP,
except as otherwise provided by law. This Consent Decree shall not be construed
to create rights in, or grant any cause of action to, any third party not party to this
Consent Decree.
XIII. COSTS
44. The Parties shall bear their own costs of this action, including attorneys' fees.
XIV. TERMINATION
45. This Consent Decree shall terminate after ANP has completed and
satisfied all of the following requirements of this Consent Decree and the
termination procedure set forth below:
a. completion of the injunctive relief specified in this Consent Decree;
and
b. payment of all penalties and other monetary obligations due under the
terms of this Consent Decree.
46. If ANP believes that it has satisfied the requirements for termination set forth above, ANP shall certify such compliance and completion to the United
States in writing. Unless, within sixty (60) days of receipt of ANP's certification,
z~ Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 28 of 62
the United States objects in writing with specific reasons, the Court may upon
motion by ANP order that this Consent Decree be terminated. If the United States objects to the certification by ANP,then the matter shall be submitted to the Court ~ or f resolution under the dispute resolution provisions of this Consent Decree. In
such case, ANP shall bear the burden of proving that this Consent Decree should
be terminated.
XV. MISCELLANEO
47. The terms of this Consent Decree may be modified only by a
subsequent written agreement signed by the United States and Defendants. Where
the modification constitutes a material change to any term of this Consent Decree,
it shall be effective only upon approval by the Court.
48. The Effective Date of this Consent Decree shall be the date upon which
this Consent Decree is entered by the Court.
49. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this case until termination of this
Consent Decree, for the purpose of resolving disputes arising under this Consent
Decree or entering orders modifying this Consent Decree or effectuating or
enforcing compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree.
50. The Parties represent that each undersigned signatory signing on their
behalf has full authority to sign the Consent Decree and to bind said party to the terms and conditions of the Consent Decree.
as Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 29 of 62
51. ANP agrees and acknowledges that final approval of this Consent
Decree by the United States and entry of this Consent Decree is subject to the requirements of 28 C.F.R. § 50.7, which provides for notice of the lodging of this
Consent Decree in the Federal Register, opportunity for public comment for at least thirty (30) days, and consideration of any comments prior to entry of the
Consent Decree by the Court. The United States reserves the right to withdraw consent to this Consent Decree based on comments received during the public notice period. ANP consents to entry of this Consent Decree without further noti to the Court. Upon approval and entry, this Consent Decree shall constitute a final judgment under Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
29 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 30 of 62
IT IS SO ORDERED
DATED this day of , 2017.
LJIVITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
30 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 31 of 62
Signature page for Consent Decree in United States v. Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc.
'FOR THE PLAINTIFF LJr1ITED STATES OF AMERICA:
DATE: 1~ ~ ~ ~ l , LEN M. MAHAN Deputy Section Chief Environmental Enforcement Section Environment &Natural Resources Division United-~ta~es Department of Justice ~) DATE: Z ~ J S . Mac~YEAL Se for ounsel E i nmental Enforcement Section Environment &Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. -Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
31 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 32 of 62
1 Signature page for Consent Decree in United States v. Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc. 2
3 FOR THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: 4
5 Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance' 6 United States Environmental Protection Agency
7
s DATE: ~ Z l L~tI ('~- By: 9 SYLV UA
10 Regional Counsel United States Environmental Protection Agency ~~ Region 9 is 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 13
14
15
16 I
17 I
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 33 of 62
1 Signature page for Consent Decree in United States v. Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc. a
3 4 DATE:,. ~ ~ ~ s 5 ALEXIS STRAUSS Acting Regional Administrator 6 United States Environmental Protection Agency 7 Region 9
8
9
10 Of Counsel: ~~ ALLAN ZABEL iz Office of Regional Counsel(ORC-2) United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 9 3 75 Hawthorne Street 14 San Francisco, CA 94105
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 I
23
24
25
26
27 f~~:~
33 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 34 of 62
1 ~ Signature page for Consent Decree in United States v. Apache Nitrogen Products, Inc. z
3 ~ FOR THE DEFENDANT APACHE r1ITR4GEN PRODUCTS,INC.: 9
5
6
7 ', DATE: August 1, 2017 B Name: Jeremy R. Barrett 9 Title: President and General Manager 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
I9
20
21 ~
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
34 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 35 of 62
1 Appendix A to Consent Decree z
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
35 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 36 of 62 thyssenivupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. .,^ 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ~~~ •~
• ~
Proposal for Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget
Presented to Apache Nitrogen Products Inc.
Prepared by thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. Rev. 4— 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 37 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ~~,,•1'~~~ t ~
This Proposal and all pertinent or attached documents remain property of thyssenla-upp
Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. and shall neither be fully or partly copied or reproduced nor
made accessible or brought to the Imowledge of third parties or competitors, unless express
approval from thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. has first been obtained.
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 2 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 38 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. 6400 ~. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 i'''''/~~~
~ •
Proposal Contents
1 Background ...... 4 1.1 Project Description ...... 4
2 Scope of Work ...... g
2.1 AOP4 Base Case Simulation ...... 6
2.1.1 Deliverables ...... g
2.2 AOP4 Nitric Acid Plant DeNOx Budgetary Proposal ...... 7
2.2.1 Deliverables ...... 7
2.2.2 Preliminary Red-line PFDs ...... 7 2.2.3 Preliminary Emissions Summary ...... 7 2.2.4 Preliminary Update Points Updated Plot Plan ...... 7
2.3 AOP4 DeNOx Installation Simulation ...... 8 2.3.1 Deliverables ...... 8
2.3.2 Submission of Report ...... 9 2.4 ANPI Obligations ...... 9 2.5 Meetings ...... 10 2.6 Time Schedule ...... 10
2.7 Commercial Terms and Conditions ...... 10 2.7.1 Pricing ...... 10 2.7.2 Payment Schedule ...... 11
2.7.3 Taxes ...... 12
2.7.4 Bid Validiry ...... 12
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 3 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 39 of 62
thyssenivupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 `'''''1~~~ • ~ 1 Background
Apache Nitrogen Products Inc. (ANPI) operates the dual pressure, Chemico Design AOP4 nitric acid plant in Benson, AZ. This plant was commissioned in the 1970s and includes an extended absorption tower with a chilled water loop. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Justice have questioned the feasibility of reducing the nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions of the AOP4 plant. A voluntary Best Available Control Technology (BACT) evaluation was done to evaluate the installation and operation of a NOx abatement (DeNOx) system and concluded that the additional back pressure may have a detrimental effect on the air compressor set. After deliberations with EPA, it was agreed that a simulation will be conducted to review if a DeNOx system can be installed without the risk of damaging the system. If not possible, the limitations need to be identified; if possible, the location and design need to be identified.
thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. (thyssenkrupp) visited the AOP4 plant August 23- 25. While at the site, the thyssenkrupp team observed the plant operation and talked with operators about how the facility operates. The team collected their results in a Visit Report. In addition, on January 24, 2017, ANPI, thyssenkrupp, and EPA's technical expert met to discuss the study and agree upon a path forward.
1.1 Project Description
During the January 2017 visit, the group agreed that thyssenkrupp would:
1. Develop a working process simulation model for the AOP4 process. As part of the simulation effort identify, additional locations for sampling points and instrumentation necessary to refine the simulation. thyssenkrupp will provide this feedback to ANPI such that ANPI can install the appropriate equipment and provide necessary information.
2. Evaluate two DeNOx technologies for suitability: Uhde DeNOx and Uhde EnviNOxO
3. Utilize the process simulation model to simulate addition of the potential DeNOx technologies to determine viability.
4. Develop a budgetary design and proposal for the appropriate DeNOx system, including budgetary cost estimate. Installation pre and post expander as well as the potential for use of a bypass stack will be evaluated.
5. Develop a summary report for ANPI on the technical feasibility and the associated risks on process and equipment reliability of the NOx abatement alternatives.
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 4 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 40 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ~~•,•1'~~/ thyssenkrupp Develop a working model and provide support to enable process optimization and continuous improvement initiatives.
This proposal contains a cost estimates for the completion of these two steps executed concurrently.
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 5 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 41 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 /~•••','~~ t ~ 2 Scope of Work 2.1 AOP4 Base Case Simulation
The proposed simulation scope of work for this effort consists of the following activities:
1. Modeling of the AOP4 nitric acid plant utilizing ProSimPlus HNO3 based on operating data from the AOP4 facility.
2. Verification of the simulation model against different observed operating cases at the AOP4 facility (Gauze Start of Life and End of Life, Compressor Start of Life and End of Life and Turndown).
3. Model report.
2.1.1 Deliverables
The model report consists of the following (for each case):
2.1.1.1 Heat and Material Balance
Heat and material balance for the 5 design cases identified in section 2.1 item 2.
2.1.1.2 Simulation flowsheet
Flowsheet from ProSimPlus HNO3 simulation indicating all streams and unit ops.
2.1.1.3 Temperature profile
Temperature profile for the five design cases identified in section 2.1 item 2.
2.1.1.4 Pressure profile
Pressure profile for the five design cases identified in section 2.1 item 2.
2.1.1.5 Tail gas composition
Tail gas composition of NOx components for the five design cases identified in section 2.1 item 2.
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 6 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 42 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 thyssenkrupp 2.2 AOP4 Nitric Acid Plant DeNOx Budgetary Proposal
The DeNOx Budgetary Proposal consists of the following:
1. Preliminary design of an Uhde technology NOx abatement system (Uhde DeNOx or Uhde EnviNOxO) detailed below. (This design will consider potential installation of a NOx abatement system pre and post expander as well as the potential for use of a bypass stack as per EPA request, and described in the document entitled "Proposed Design and Location of SCR," dated April 21, 2017.)
2. Budgetary cost estimate for the engineering and procurement of the NOx abatement system based on the preliminary design.
2.2.1 Deliverables
2.2.1.1 Name-Only Equipment List
The preliminary equipment consists of:
• Equipment name and tag
• Preliminary process sizing dimensions
• Preliminary material selection
• Preliminary design conditions
2.2.2 Preliminary Red-line PFDs
The preliminary red-line PFDs consists of:
• Red-line mark-ups of ANPI's existing PFDs indicating tie-point locations for new equipment and piping
2.2.3 Preliminary Emissions Summary
The preliminary emissions summary indicates the anticipated NOx emissions once the DeNOx system is installed.
2.2.4 Preliminary Update Points Updated Plot Plan
The preliminary updated plot plan indicates the location of all tie points.
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 7 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 43 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 thyssenkrupp 2.3 AOP4 DeNOx Installation Simulation
Once suitable DeNOx alternatives have been identified, the ProSimPlus HNO3 simulation will be updated to incorporate the DeNOx system to determine the impact of the DeNOx system installation on the operations of the AOP4 facility. The output of these simulations will be included in the model report.
The AOP4 simulation will only be verified against operating data provided by ANPI during the course of the study. Data collected during this period will not represent all potential operating conditions possible within the facility. Any operation outside of the range of data collected during this project cannot be guaranteed by the simulation. thyssenkrupp will assure that the design of new equipment and systems will contain safeguards to protect equipment and personnel.
2.3.1 Deliverables
The model report consists of the following (for each case):
2.3.1.1 Heat and Material Balance
Updated heat and material balance for the five design cases (Gauze Start of Life, End of Life, Compressor Start of Life, End of Life, and Turndown) incorporating the DeNOx system.
2.3.1.2 Simulation flowsheet
Flowsheet from ProSimPlus HNO3 simulation indicating all streams and unit ops incorporating the DeNOx system.
2.3.1.3 Temperature profile
Temperature profile for the five design cases identified in section 2.1 item 2 incorporating the DeNOx system.
2.3.1.4 Pressure profile
Pressure profile for the five design cases identified in section 2.1 item 2 incorporating the DeNOx system.
2.3.1.5 Tail gas composition
Tail gas composition of NOx components for the five design cases identified in section 2.1 item 2 incorporating the DeNOx system.
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 8 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 44 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 thyssenkrupp 2.3.2 Submission of Report
The model report will be submitted simultaneously to ANPI and EPA.
2.4 ANPIObligations
thyssenkrupp will provide ANPI with an initial list of operating data points to be collected as the basis of the model. ANPI is responsible to respond to thyssenkrupp with a timeline for collecting this data within five (5) business days of submission. This data will include, but is not limited to:
• Operating temperatures
• Operating pressures
• Operating flowrates
• Nitric Acid yield
• Stream Composition
• PFDs of existing plant
• P&IDs of existing plant
• Layout and arrangement plans of existing plant
Should accurate figure for the data request be unavailable due to limitations within the AOP4 instrumentation system, ANPI is responsible to inform thyssenkrupp within the same time frame so that other provisions may be made. Over the course of the effort, thyssenkrupp may request additional operating data for use in model verification. thyssenkrupp will formally submit a request for additional information, at which point ANPI will have five days to provide the timeline to supply requested operating data.
Upon receipt of data, thyssenkrupp will evaluate data quality for simulation purposes and inform ANPI of status prior to running simulations. If data is not of quality to allow for reasonable simulation, thyssenkrupp will inform ANPI and hold on proceeding with simulation so as not to unnecessarily expend hours trying to verify simulation with poor quality data. It may not to be possible to determine data quality prior to simulation efforts with every data set, but thyssenkrupp will endeavor to do so.
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 9 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 45 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 ~~•,•1'~~~ t ~ 2.5 Meetings
During the execution of this effort, thyssenkrupp has not assumed any expenses for in-person meetings requiring travel. Any travel for meetings will be reimbursed at cost + 10%.
2.6 Time Schedule
See Attachment 1: Preliminary Time Schedule.
2.7 Commercial Terms and Conditions
thyssenkrupp has included a commented, sample "Master Services Agreement" supplied by ANPI that could be utilized as the basis of the agreement if mutually agreed upon. This agreement still requires further internal review by thyssenkrupp. This agreement could also serve as the basis for future work performed by thyssenkrupp for ANPI.
2.7.1 Pricing
The pricing of the project consists of two components:
2.7.1.1 DeNOx budgetary proposal price
Assuming that the DeNOx system design utilizes thyssenkrupp standardized proprietary information, the DeNOx budgetary proposal will be performed on a lump-sum basis with price for this effort of:
USD 15,000.00 (Fifteen Thousand US Dollars)
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 10 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 46 of 62
thyssenlvupp Industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 thyssenkrupp 2.7.1.2 DeNOx budgetary proposal price
Due to the fact that the simulation work is contingent upon availability and access to information this effort will be performed on a reimbursable basis utilizing the following man-hour rates:
the estimated price for this effort is:
USD 94,000.00 (Ninety Four Thousand US Dollars)
Note:
The price is subject to change based on the actual level of effort required for the completion of the simulation model.)
1Man-hour rates valid through 30 September 2018, rates subject to revision 1 October 2018.
ZThis rate is based on the EURO converted into an USD amount at exchange rate of 1.09 USD/EUR using fixed by European Central Bank (ECB}. Upon the date of invoicing if the exchange rate published by the European Central Bank (ECB) fluctuates by more than 10% (Ten Percent) either way the rate will be adjusted accordingly. ECB's official website is http://sdw.ecb.europa.eu/.
Total budgetary price of lump sum and reimbursable components: USD 109,000.00 (One Hundred NineThousand US Dollars)
2.7.2 Payment Schedule
The Payment Schedule for the Services described in this Proposal is as follows:
Retainer —Upon contract execution 25% of Total Estimated Price in 2.6.1 At the end of each 4 week period Billed actual hours x Rate for previous 4 weeks Delivery of Final Deliverables Final payment (Actual Hours for previous 4 weeks —Retainer) of Total Price in 2.6.1 "All invoices are net
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 11 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 47 of 62
thyssenlvupp industrial Solutions(USA), Inc. 6400 S. Fiddler's Green Circle, Suite 700 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 thyssenkrupp 2.7.3 Taxes
All taxes are excluded from this Proposal and will be the responsibility of ANPI.
2.7.4 Bid Validity
This offer will be valid for acceptance until 28 February 2018.
Apache Nitrogen -Nitric Acid Plant Simulation and DeNOx Budget Page 12 of 13 Rev. 4 — 30 November 2017 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 48 of 62
below
schedule
the
to
adhere
to
efforts
best
use
will
13
ANPI
~
ut
~
y
and
13
~•-r
Page
~(/~
i
~(_.XJ/
i
/
hyssenkrupp
t
thyssenkrupp
task
task
task
task
NPI
PI/tk15
PA
tk15 A A E
Budge[
DeNOz
and
Nrc.
Schedule
700
NSAI~
Simula4on
Suite
Time
Plant
111
Circle,
SoWtlons
BO
Acid
2017
CO
Green
Niuic
Preliminary
-
1:
IndushiN
Village.
November
Fiddler's
30
Nitrogen
S.
—
4
achment
tt reenwood
400
G
Nryssenlwpp pache A
6
ev.
R
A Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 49 of 62
1 Appendix B to Consent Decree 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
36 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 50 of 62
of
are
to
axial
inlet
gas
air
axis
to
fans
and/or
are
and
and
the
pressure per
supports
not
smaller
of
Axial
wet
larger
gas centrifugal
fans
("SCR")
and
feet
industrial
contrary
of
of
and
fans.
buildings
Axial moving
moderate
conditions
cubic
and/or
therefore
direction
possible
types
and
bearings
larger reduction
are
hot
variety
while
only
all
flow
the
Determination:
therefore,
all
of
wheel.
of
of
to
to
and
centrifugal
known
standard
rooms
and
large
fan
BACT drops
low
in
catalytic
a
means
kinds
and
the
conveying
very
flow
all
for
a
of
fans
This
fans
for
conveyed
gas
to
in
thousand
SCR
development
adaptability pressure
commonly
axis
be
perpendicular
selective
the
of
axial
fans
itself.
a
the
overcoming
to is
used
high
the
to
exhaust
Most
of
to
of
to
considered
hundred
flow
flow
universal
while
led
namely
be
stream
B
gas
advantageous
drops.
gas
Location
has
centrifugal
2017
mounted
more location
gas commonly
several
the
direction the
of
moderate
and should 21, of
others.
the
perpendicular
and
efficiently
-wall
their
available, the
more
that
is
pressure
of
in
pril
APPENDIX within
and
that
to
A
particularly
advantage
are
most
are
fact
is
being
design
not
Design
large
volumes
wheel
overcome
designs
adaptability
fans
outside
AOP-4
the
are
fans
to
This
parallel
gas
fan
chargers
fan distinct even
by
is
for
reason
volumes
axial
the
proposed
This
roposed
turbo
of gas
flow
of
a
universal
P
main
bearings
designed
Centrifugal
different
gas
conveying
overcome
axis
the
large
are
types
more
of
technology shaft
accommodated
to
the
only.
streams.
characteristics.
characterized
blowers,
the
with
describes
be
very
fans
gas
that
are
much
to
leaf known
that
ability
principally
can
control
capable
fans
wheel's
the fact
of volumes
stream's
fans
fact
fan large
their
axial
air
shaft
for
following
the
dryers,
abrasive
gas
the
Centrifugal
designs
types
radial
he by
ollution
is and
commonly
p
T
the
hair
move
than
large
or
wheel
fan
engines.
two
to
to
and/or
Type:
criterion
wheel.
Most
centrifugal
jet
(scfm).
fan
are
a
Fan
of
key
include
fan
the
oderately
inute ne
here
rops.
esigned
haracterized entrifugal pplications
.
he
ompositions
ubjected ompositions
orrosive ans entrifugal
ans
ans, or
m 1 c d T d
C
a t
f O c
m
c
f
c f s c
f Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 51 of 62
other
world's
drive
any
the
over
of
retrofit.
one
frequency
SCR
vendor
the
flange
this
variable
of
for
Howden,
a
fan
for
rectangular
booster
application,
endorsement
ID
quotation
F)
an
this
discharge,
500
for
construction
@
budgetary
centrifugal
and
represent
a
a
upward
acfm
suitable
level
for
not
for
flange
fan
gauge
design
characteristics
a sea
vertical
does
(50,725
of
asked
quote
vol.
gas
F round
ppmvd
water
%
and
above
and
scfm
steel,
only
flue
S00
ft
resistant
250
—
to
inches,
inches
-3%vol.
p
00
availability
park
0 ,500 .1-2.0 arbon budgetary
races
u 28,000
2 8
4 c t 3 3 s
0
example
contacted
following
an
general
the
was
only
following
PM:
on
is
and
,
3
the
50
rate:
,
easy
overcome:
based
2 suppliers
quote
with
be
S0
flow
plant:
the
fan
fan
this
O:
:
to
2
2
NO:
H HCI,
0
the
-
- - -
vendor.
that
prove
diameter:
of
drop
volume
composition: temperature:
responded
to
industrial
note
duct
centrifugal
gas
gas gas
housing:
order
Flue
Pressure
Elevation owden
flue Fan Design: Inlet
flue
lease
VFD)
argest
omparable
l In
- - -
- H
- - P -
-
c
( Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 52 of 62
•
•
Quo~Aoac
HL~.GGB0038
sheet
Rate
time.
this
d'13
Curve
Service
at
and
Paget
Torque
an
F
information
Speed
the
Conditions
of
and
further
and
arty
Sketch
Curve
Sheet
Terms
require
Data
Sheet Inc.
Covent
Dimension
ifyou
Schedule
Data Pertormance
Sound
Fans
us
Manager
Price Fan Outline Fan Fan Howden
include:
Covent
o o o o o o
contact
2074
Brill
regards,
Account
75
reg
est lease owden
ey
Enclosures
P B H G
K
/~orY
Sd
Inc.
U
Drive
14221
OKce
Fans
a
NY
dampers
Sales
We.Frle
QUOt2.L10CJ(
716-817-6903
for
with
No
guard.
offered.
Covent
775 important
1 reliability.
field
Fax D
Covent
~
egmal
with
4
Nlliamsville,
VF
for
R
~"~OWC~e11
and
Y
Packing
mrden
offered. provided
H
HCITGB~36 gbril~Coverrtfam.wm
lnc.
S.F.
and
is
7-697
follovaing
loose
Howden
1.5 been
the
651
Fans
insulation.
Canada.
motor
efficiency
71
Coat
has
damper Manaser
T10,
of
note
D
the
shipped
Tel:
base.
(1)
2074
of Covent
VF
The
be
1080
and
Quebec,
ccount
8nU
OLD.
Please
A and
motor
fan.
details
would
ey prep
pages Model
the
the
Nowden Greg
K Ap~i175,
and
acousticrthermal combination
coversheet
of
to
motor of
project.
VFD
fan
Fax
{Montreaq
best
surface
`~~~
complete
WEG
Via
your
for
couging,
supplied
a
NumOer
P3 DATE:
shut-off FR~Nt srcRrding
Bruno
e. for on
aligned. included.
❑
connection
for
Gorman
for
St.
design.
716-817~90Cf
and
for
in Gridlex
been
with
SSPC-S
price
customer
toleraru
(1200rpm)
requ~ed
Fax: disk
NMN.hOV~dCn.COT
V
an
has
Falk
included ~.~~entfans.com
shop
for
information
linkage
fan
G2.5
option
mounted
speed
all
pins impeler)
gnen
to
lubricated. been
design.
An
WEG
aluminum
and are
Howden
has
motor
Boos[er
drirnerwith
or~struction
See
factory,
blade
l
c
grease
included.
speed.
LD] the
balanced
single insulation
the
primer.
(overhung -pole
motor
(0
Emai for 6
at
8
actuator
surfaces
type,
ExWorks
been
curved
to
with
Vra
included.
Hz,
Inc.
Arr.
varying
has steel
dynamic
standard
60 by
Damper
electric
5499 6B5
ans ~
offered proposal
been
received
at
is
450-441-2189
F
coupled SWSI
and
Hartenstein is
temperature
provided
antifriction
J3V
Inc.
Hach backward
HCV Cspark-resistant be
Kuntz
our
is
carbon
is
Fax:
have
is
-close
is
~
Louver
HCVGGB0036
ontrol are
high
shipment
isa
has
went
direct
static
c
Nans
F&EC
Rick
L
Fans 50869
C
Type
Street selected
is
is
ur:
seal
open
Quebec
Draft
offered
is
casing
O
Your:
Office
CA
Outlet
control
e
external equipment
otorwould
adam,
716-817~9T4
eck
omestic Covent
tandard
or
nstallation.
following
Rotor
Fan
Rotor Fan Bearings Impeller M
Shaft i
AM Primary
B
An Fan All d f T7: s All
G
owden O: ales
EMARKS:
EG: el
Ofiic
T
Hocquart
7
A irlM C
ef:
T S he
H -Bruno,
oints:
R
nduced
450-441-3233
p
I
S
R
T
•
•
• • • • • • • •
•
•
•
ovuien eed
anada
aint
381
el:
H H
C 1
S T Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 53 of 62
Aocx
with
•
Quote
S.F.
owden
1.5
others
H
by
3.5'
15116
T10,
HLUGGB0036
12
15716
1090
2
Curved
3116 supplied
1,500
t
7,659 h
6,159
2,242
Rolled)
Evase
=
50
f 550
690
100
56
1,180 SWSI 1,433
o
overhung
17,300
Grease
AQodel:
Sideplate=
dor=
otal
1.9
C45S-5650
8, A588I
(Hot
Fan=
BO
linkage
T
M
mexmotabae:
nred
rrt~friction
500 36I
NfA Backward
u
0.00 8.00
8d.1
mc.
A36/Scroll=3116 Rated
-8.00
1,1
A
78.2%
O.Od14
-0.287 50,725 A
C
and
126.0009
B~kward
C45S-5650
uard,
SI1045
coupling,
g
tans
lasses.
AI
Actuator
% hp
'F
rpm
~zsar Gridflot
Ib/ft'
acfm Units
in.w~g in.w~g
in.wg in.wg
Klblhr covenr
vi
.
13
Falk
nx
d
Howaen
ar
Evase
Page4
Rate
N
niereinressue
in
rpm Ih
Ih.fP in ft in
rpm in
Rise in ftlmin Ib.R Ib
h 'F
~
phase
Present
tr
w~hcwt
Flow
Pressure
Type
Efficiency
Pressure
b,.
ILD
Iosses:OLD
ee
or
Consumption
of Static
Pressure Rise
Density Voliane Model Static Blade
Temperature
Speed
use
e7evatpn
VIV
enganee~uxl
assFbwRate
ondition
utlet Speed
it o
an
an tatic ower otalAcc an
tatic
nlet nlet Size
nlet nlet
M
F C I I I I
F O
S N F
P T S
Draft
o~es.,e
aunrx~
3,500
Mota
Critical
-4'F
ssaue
~
at
n
—
rpm
m Temp.
change
@Hub
Induced
- Diameter
to
Data
eaze
RatiolFirst
Required
(wlc~j
Design Design
OLD
Data
pe7Diameter
Weight
Recommended
Wheel
Materiallfhickr~ess
94
subject
Lubrication
Ty
ateriaUDia.
Speed
Area
Service:
Type
2p MateriallThickness u
Weight Inertia
M
Model
Torque
Speed
p~
an
ata
ertormance
idth
idcal
echanical echanical
lade rrangement ominal
vase otor otes
haft echnical LD inimum ip lade earing earing
oupling
ctuatorfor
stimated
busing
F D
e~meno~mwaan~
P
B N M M W E
A R Fan T
R B
B • T B Q S F
C O M
A E
,goriV
Quo~dooc
3,615
6,574 6,235
Draft
846,126
erfan
Included Included
Included 562,550 Included Included Included Included
Included
Included Included Included
SI-1180
W
Howden 1S
C45S-49T5
S
~
Induced
HLUGGB0036
extra)
T&C
stem
Tmc
Model
Plant
S
Covent
and
an
F
gs
Fan
ship.
to
owden
Cogent
H
(Freight
Coventshop
draroin
of
CAN,
5.1
shop
readiness
apply
sheet.
review Howden
Howden
or
and
at
guard
for
rate clause
primer
TBC
shall
(VFD)
FCA
per
with
Sale
13
as
PlantQuebec,
shipment
F. of
Covent
M material
Drwe
drawings
unit
enclosed
engineering
S.
3
standard otor
meet
from
of
the
Carrell
M per
major
d~ions
1.5
outline
Page
on
ship
Howden of
al
days
cond'Rions.
of box
Con
of
insulationJcladding
OLD
30
Covent
6om
drawing. ~efortMy(30)d.rys.
Frequency
aid
TEFC
Howden
-Tat and
52
of
net canpletion receipt issue
of
inlet
shut-off analysis}
mo.
ub
specified
S
1060T10,
as
terms
18
accepfa
Terms
and far upon upon upon upon
lubricated
clause
or
supplied
6NUo~ks
Howden
our
br
control
Variable r.
approval
Inc.
Construction
per
Bahance
rates
rs
3J60/46U,
in
vahre
connections
equency as
scroll
Model:
for
wde vafd
13
the
after
(OLD)
fr
Coat ddla
Fans
'C'
Grease
sh~ment start-up
in
at
460V
RPM,
US
aRer
customer (1)
outlet
contractvalue contwct contradvalue contradvalue
in
from
weeks
Type
Dynamic
section
extra
Covent
dcs
doors
overhung
Guarantee
is Damper
are
mo.
and
Actuator.
coupling, quota[ion's per
toTal total total total 1200 601-h,
Prep
Sale
domestic
of of of
bearings,
Bwa
2830
12
(Resonant as
#8,
pinsfor
of
Ths
HP,
HP,
niet
Hproden
Prices
for
arr
1076 1596
3596 access
40%of
Servca:
Lower
Resistant
Test • • • •
50 50
Electric Tolerance
Oridflex
Surface
—
unds:
:rtormance: hipmerR:
F
Fan, Validity: R Warranty: Timms: Payment: DraHings:
Fidd
S
ntifriction
park
langed
ump
P3
nsulation
CondRions
G2.5 Fak Botted A
F
Outlet S Beck
I WEG WEG B
S Packing
Data
asic
• ccessories • •
•
• •
and
2DM
B
A
•
•
•
• • • •
•
ms
15
ricing
er
T P
{wig
! Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 54 of 62
~~
d
N
Inc.
s_ t
DATE:
Fans
1.~~
3
~4.
~
'
_
64.0
Covent
-
~~~
~
~-~
6.2
4
TYPE
Howden
.:
ERVICE:
ff
CUSTOMER:
S
FAN
R
_
:
5
i
4~-
i
~
~
_
-r-2.5
_
---
9.
vertical
u
from
180°
is
5.~~
~
,
otation
r
~lES.
OMMENTS:
N
C Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 55 of 62
IIIC.
~~
Hp
Ib•ft
F80S
we..
OYM
~
~-IoMrd~n 445
100
.ter..
—+—
.
COYBM
D~e1t
o~Sbrt
~
NU-RUn
1190
HOMfd211
5A0
Induced
fOC2
Rating
No. FLT
3741b~R
7871bk
914
ilem
Mohr
hbbr
82G
BHP@
7lH
84
rpa
~
G{~S^BGaO
N
Ib(t~
PEED
S
:
:
•4
p33
500
4T2
t
NOdEI
HCYGGB0036
354
:
CansumpdOn
~2N1
Ib.
iprtl
CURVE
23S
WICK
S~rt•up?
Job
PaNer
for
ohr
R
118
1,190
pamper
0
-TORQUE 00
oo
oo
U0
900 00
9 z
c 5
t
270
Totqu2at
s
SPEED
~
EHP
b4.i6
POYrER i l
60
B.
ROW
puCFM 50725
'~
Ibwdent:oventlanalnc
_
-
50
v0
Ps2
0.00
inwg
Bra
HC4GGBOOCie a~'~Caa+a
v
br
Psi 8.00
~wq
Rele!e~e Ltiw
Fstin.
40
l0
A.00
inwg
Ps2-t
ACFMt180b
ACFW1404
+tE~Wi25.D3(~
Floc,
30
3Q
KIbA
1260
MIASS
nIelYdume
rietVdume~buv
I I
IhNP
UGi14
DENSRY
_
20
r•'
20
~F
9D0
TEMP
•
mn
•r_
_
PM
hrwrlon
_ R
Curve
R 1190
14
t4 ~EE6
,
Feet
vrrnr
OrsR
D.mpe IC
0
o
N
Mducad C16S-9850800
E&EC _
b
CLeta~
~
0
ut;~a~
0
~
a
p 0 2 0
0 o
P
4
2 PBrtorinance
6
i
1 10 0 ~
~p
6 9 ao 8 3
20
,
Tie
(smy
v.t~_oe
kr~etbn
~
at 4rolro an
~ Lsiomef
m
~cmcceihr ~
~ Fan
G
F
E S S l
t Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 56 of 62
~S)
Pri[e
CorE"
781-4352
$6,906.00
Cariadalnt.
Unit
~4]6J
31
Fa:
C
Parnensky
-Part
V.J.
mast
1
om
c
60Hz
Fl
MG
781T4617
-••
SAeet
]U00
960V
sky.
en
Data
(476)
NEMA
pam
Tel:
Voltage
Mounting. Altitude: Frequency
peg
www.
].OSF
-•
yJ14
at
taces-
a
e
I
]b
have
offier
1
April
444/ST
Fnme
a
availab
s
VFD
❑Other.
a[e:
C
us. quote1J.140415-DDHC
CC:
D GST, Pages:
°
dRion
80
10/1
ruitha
tact
quote
con
1.15
[aces,
con
Page
this
Dollars cial
and
F
to
driven
TEFC
US
rc
re Fxtor:
~~M
1200
Provin
terms
submit
Q
esitate atio
m000a
c.
~
n to
ufactu Ak
any I
c2 Ail
Inwiaaion:
Enclosure: Tempera[ureRise: Service n
n
pec
ada
ma
s
date
do
o
b
pleased
inUude Can
N
Dollars ease
yal
am
not
sky
date.
re=
I pl
ro
fl►
]AO
do
pp
quotation
ce, ptio
iry.
a
itions
e
an
Pamen
n~22 u
invoice
40'C
E
Rewarla
herein
IP55
V.J.
fray
CoM
assist
nd
Covent
❑Canadian
kc
a
opportun
to
Dao
-Exception
daysfram
er
E
a
Sales
nm
~101t
premium
rage
this
daysfrorn
Covent5hop
Iteei
specified
ul
forth
me
B
Brill
fa 30
Hayden Su6je
Qty 1
HCVGG60036
m Protec[bn:
ae
Ball
Temperature.
FO
10-11
TecY~i[al Nema
ham
QtlOIt
of
Co
3 Ge
Net
DaveDenham :
you
Prices
—
~F
Grc~ Validity:90 ConLnuous
-Motes
ry
k -
E&EC require
:
1- 2
Gen
i[iorc:
3
ie
regards,
S
4-
n
-Comment •
1
em
liue
ompany' M: tt
egree C M h mbient earings:
han
uty:
hase: ec.
t urrency. !C. you uote
kom: ec.
C ec. e
A R
T est P S D ave hypi~: ec. A aus:
D B
o $
C
S S
D
T Te~mc: S Q K B C
L S ~
"
b
hl:
~aa t73 9? @2 69
aSt~e
tss
~"~wx~on
16
TD 79
6+
i4
}WG~~ONSi
N
[ena~ellibn
ioea:
EUEsS
s~eue
91 01
B1 31 BD
i
~b
NOSE
tzr~.go
A9 d9
0 41
'~
siffiiJ4ce
rt
oticr
STATED
ary
a
0: 96 96
57
...)
Bel Ni~~t1
IM,RFhSE
ar
H~~~~~'do]ac
O
ar~a~~rus~[e
huY
Bo.
Tarr
ILD
toan~,
% BI B8
t02
102
,u■i.
.a4
C
Fc►zcne
E
(mcOur,
OFgYOF
A
7'J
91
t06
106
cquprcrt
WSUPE
C
~Aor
~A
92 T7
T7 in
to6 I10
ae
1p
PARTUu.
corz'iom
A
dBa+er~
rc
lewb
E
E~
2~
~ ~S $
t0~
ili
-i-3 gana
~Ld
pf
Ncraacrra~
~ar[al
mtc
Gtl,ofiq
~t
nmcn~
Om~aH:ouid
sv='»
yd~en~d
:ilwcw
oe~eerdmd
HOT
ya
emio
ctkch
~
nd6-
culu~ S
~
4t~0
fet
.
aie
,R
Fes;
ED
a
fsE
rapul~azc;Marsli~sWrta~,trminQ+d~d~utt+fpfipxrr~Psor
IiCtllfTQ
hox
4M3)
..rMv+n...m
m
iNA'
,
Oah G[
.
t
;a
nOt
ES"T -
slFiccrb~o
~v.cminp roR~9 LBVQ~S
c97inp
o
LWq.R1CY.
moe
6a8d IMucpdGre~
Ue3~fA0-Co0-R E&EC
L
tl
nac~Ye
r~
is
fal
a ~Nw
on
tum
iYCt
!tc
fg
MT
hvcE
~~e
Y~re~
f-06~1
9rce
i.Dm
OU
aouati
cco Iw~n
~ossenas
DmmO
D~c7tlOultt NOV
kn~aon sr~rs r~15E
aiT~W
p Tde N~6e N
1i0G in
oermncoumn .itwgMLOY
r M F E w ~Ure~~lr .ISODII]'
.S ' avd
, n - - Aalt.Dmt'am n
8 Dat s
- 4
W t
l
I • I
: Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 57 of 62
214
a
0
fan
E
and
and
lirrrt,
YYLP
horn
set
speed, ramps,
US
energy the
operate
Process
distance
mirnmum
set be
to
Net using sirrulates output
currem
be
loss,
Ova multi ra the
mathematical
cvcui
(416j781-4352
if
E5,944-00
Ironworks
coUd
operate
is
resistor,
outputs.
can
Incorrect
Total
pot,
Alcohol,
o~ratlon,
adjustable
outpU
short
analog PLC, PF~se
and
and
of
boards),
reactor
(there
rrdn.
and
temperature,
rrin
(P403}
braking
fan
acefunction
equency
E
tr
10 prograrrmng
fr
circuit, a'r
load 10
ground
inputs
inputs,
V
hours
the
EI2Ctf0~IIC
of
the
to LIS
a~ustable
Sugar
Pehahemical,
in
network Fac:
Processor
Programmng,
eaery
elechoNc
coding
configurable
outp~i every
0..10
pvu~er digAal
s
E5,944.00 independerrtly s frequency
IrRemal UnR
analog
need
and
3
status,
of
the the
any language
3
bit,
Phase
the
braking occurs,
the
UOs,
rro
arW
n
on
in
11
Cooling,
is
rated
Overbad %fa
DC
drNe
Incortect
antl status %for
air
25i1t inp~ds,
fre~encies,
anent
alarm,
ladder
disable
COfI'K1EIl5d1q(1,
a
This
and
150
Cherrrcal
there
antl
200
keys
lifting,
as
skip heatsink
level,
deceleration KB,
maloi, ir~st~led
slip SUMMARY
~g6al n;
time, —rating
resd~Rion
mirk
internal soft
VFD
d in
15
be
III
de
(P403).
triggerng braking
10 /external
provided Mining,
the
three
antl
therrra9at),
crane
volage
10 parameters
mode;
a
to
and and
mots
fit)
voltage
~d
aB
WEG or
cords
ar
speed
outputs,
a
Fait
every
UnderJOvervotage
VFD
DC
AAodel adddional
limits,
eery without
run
I~ad (330
mondorsthe
VFD
memory
wf~en
categay
vector Optimal
s,
the ~i~lay all current,
literature s,
boost,
boards
frequency
rectifie►
h
11
vector
Over
60
the to
wtth
in
the
to
analog
—1, 60
motor,
-p SPECIFICATION
Over
circud,
Cerrerd
I
nor
acceleration or V
sistor,
fa altitude
in
meters
version,
output
therrrtistors
ns
for use) fan, rated
CFW700C142P5T4DBN1
CFW
bacldrt
the
re
mclude~ toque % variables
selection:
Hz
frequency
allanr
e~encies
720
—954 %
6~ pGBTs,
in
100
°S"
e~ency,
tr is
access
the
and
7JA
fr to
with plug
model FWl00
PVYM
to
110 a08 space
speeds
IYrrited:
motor wtll
EN connected ectra
request
C
functbns,
{1000rt~
software
30
Ski as
500—
acid ~s braking up
heatsink
~y
(requres
MfiA
CfW11
R
Comrrun~ation oto
are
braking,
nil
irnerter witl~ mes
that is folb~aing
(HMI) MZ
cabinet
V,
om
upon
adjustable ri
speed,
Cycle: Overload
fr (correct
the fntemet),
~Icle:150
regulator
~mith
rw
CellubsdWood, the
the
DC but
motor
3~0 Road
3.4 contrdled
OvercurrenUShort
n
motor ectra HP
460160
,
Lnear
motor Volts
Ontario the External in and register —480
Duty
to
Through, designated
PID preselected condition, boards,
aNaiable
Management,
to
is contra,
encaier.
Daly
Motor
and
reactor,
B duty
to
1 the 0
irtertace
-p 150
IGBT's,
the
I
programmable in, available
option,
380
FaWt
50°C
rrumrrum
to
the 5arrar from
to fault xcordance
in PLC 700
Ride
to
control
V/
irxlude, Vtl~
aorto ink
the phbsopty to
to Certificatiar~s
up
hbrma~ in Heavy re9riction), blceks
osc8loscope
T Features: 121 64
and in
Boards
Paper and
L5
built
~verter
in Thermal NEMA - - for Amps
ridethru,
rc
Features:
(free according
V
-10
DC wive
CE
is
readngs:
Play
capabild~s
Hz output, equency,
features
tit isdated,
Stop —CFW
Functions,
—Machine Terrperafure
fr
D
outputs,
in from and microprocessor
speed
anc~alone PLC
atherrrostat.
2 210
the
orrmuNcationoptions orrmissoring
cortrol
regulator,
fans
and the tUL, 400 WEG Hp
C C
VFDwasszedforVanableTorqueApplicatbn; ~ VF 100
ti
—
non
ver
verload ax~num
onnection txriperatue
,
dh
channels
t achines, etallurgy
BR
easurement, OG
nd 1020 ID ollware
he ocaYrerrate
xpansron
mpedance Uther to igital
2 up~f
Proteciwe O O a verload C T ConVol
rom
m Budt J intelligerd t I Soft s am i w 4 irr~an arNy a
2
Trace Safety Multi 00 lug P Applications M M
f
Iia Display o m Ambiert d Brakng E
F
l
O • 0 • O
t
3 2
F
P H
ty
1
07ES: ption
- -
-
- -
-
-
-
- -
-
- -
Q
-
O N
1!4
0
S
on,
low
Page'
from
set
USB
US
to
11
Vector
be
set
0.30m+1
complete
Net
and
1
be
application
option)
A
parameters,
GFW
V
(416)7$1-4617 (416}781-4352
$6,235.00
the
related
could
can
Votage
Trial
6903 697 tt~s and
tools.
with
Only
— —
TCPtIP
0..10
of
A
to
n
2014
pemsask.ca
min.
—
bit,
min
817
~c 817
through
control
(P40~
fdlows
17,
standard
Read — —
need
3
~g
10
fain
frequency
10
10
,y
00
as
plug
Modbus
require
no
US
716 716 [email protected]~nnilto
parameters a~onsoc~ukiamenskv.com
April
VlFk
~
is rocesso'
ir
relai
every
F
Phone: P
every
outpU Group, of
t
nauigate
s
b6,235
Unit s
frequ~cy
3
alrrrost
3
the
resolutia~
submittal TCP/IP,
function,
and
61000-312
albw
C
raked
hardware
History
Fax:
Phone: E sult
Emait Date:
%for adjustab~
horsier
11.
IEC
%for
re
copy to
inp~is
a
Brakng
form
This
150
the
Hz),
Ethernet
200
Fault
quaRalion
frequency CFW
as boardswilh
DC
meets clock,
SUMMITRY
6D
min;
our
arrabg mv~;
the relays
(additional
irAernel,
CFW11
a9ows
antl
2 (P403). Open,
10
to
link,
terse 10
501 mode;
A,
the
11,
swdching
Conrd
YDC 1
DC
Fxovide real
CAN expar~si~
f
every
Model
Appligtims,
—
Encoder every
24
to Bralmg
of
vector
s,
from (scalar
s, Language.
CFW
instalatbn
HOWDEN
frequency
Net,
n
Vector
VAC
IGBT's
with
60
— capa6iliies
60
CFW1100742T4SZ
Basic
programrreble,
free
the
*and I-tr
SPECIFICATION
for
Vtl-~
fw backlight,
boards
outpU 2b0
isdated
rated
for
pleased Optimal
add
a~dion
up, of
ncluded
Hz —AC
fm
% keypad network
pov~aer
the
Device
120 prograrmiing
Vector
%
to
—
1
is
PamEnsky
are
FW11 Selectable
to
1JA on keys,
—
50
PWM
110
408
C motor
inputs
«tra
7
DP,
and
finQions
outputs
v.2 PLC
field
image
30
Start
to power
ou[p~9
Braking,
rerrgte
soft
MfiA exparxion
are 0
pararreter): prograrrmng
loadable 60
~
hIZ
the cabn~
group,
Soft
f tirres
the
d~gtal Cycle: albwingthe rNay
for —0415
py
VFD
Cycle: m
from
quote
Vector
ir~p~is,
with
ra
mourned
w~h
in
~ stores
(via via
Cordova
P~ofibus controlled 14
HCVGG80036 3.d
Road
exVa
460
~
the
fm
Votts
CanatlalV.J. and Duty
Oriented
Brill
Denham
Ontario Dynamic
optbr~s
to
is Control,
Duty
irnerter
option
ti
adjustable
applications)
0
-in);
Ftr
option,
updated
dispay,
chokes
11
functbns, functions,
pararr~eters
Senor
H Greg
Mole,
Dane kFtr WEG available Alfonso V/
VIF~
20
philos~Yy,
selection
Mode: request
differential
aoMo
PLC
be
Menu
Norrhal harrc~ics
Heavy Of~a: Sensaiess
(butt so~vare
121
prdect
in
64 T indicatim IirYc
IP
- Amps -
for
capabikties,
languageprogrammng CFW
10.0
seledan,
is
can
Plaq
Hz
your
~OASK4VYEG J
keypad — I-tr
RfU
unit (Soft
Reference DC
mode CapabiMties:
D
frequency, mcroprocessor
Drive
Backup
1
orrnwrrication Memay orttnissioning
lan[}abr~e
currerd
isolated
(V~lVvj,
in purrp
5.0 and Hp
400 VFDwassfzedforVariadeTaqueAppNcation; 100
VF C C
1f S
BIT
1020
Greg
to
verbat~
EG
Pamensky
r~r pr~rarmiable programmable
rasp, non
o rogr~rnning Rmr✓are
m:
oM+are
anguage omrrunication 4...20rrtQ. O~fpu[ u:
O 0 t 32 Butlt 2.51 Graphic o l Plug
Prograrrrrdrig • •
g p Multi
Passuordto Super Brak~g Control
W Specific Flash
Modbus s F Selectable
c
3 2
o: ontact 6
ro c: tt
ear oIIFree1 ustomer oncerning
ty 1
ption OTES:
.J.
!
A F T C C
T V
D Q C
C
N
O
-
-
- -
- -
-
- -
- - -
- -
-
- -
- - - Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 58 of 62
A14
the
Page:
at
rates
rates
details,
b7781-4352
Inc.
invoicing. hr
hr
hr
S
(416j781-4617
(41
of
Km
service
service
(Special)
(Special)
(standard {standard
forvrardto
Cast
Cost
~.00I
date
Canada
additional
Basic
Rate $t Basic
x270-00!
50.55/ s3gp.00!
look
the
at
at
any
ved'sne
Overtime Overtime
Ovedime We
O
BiNed
Billed
us.
ax: raesso:
Pamensky
Ptrorre: F
P requre
VJ Sale.
mordhsfrom
of
etc
the any 8
arty
contact
that t e!c)
should
VYEG
in
to
in
to
or
supplied.
hours
Tols,
tours you
knorovnto
cost.
bcal
cars
peKormrg
8 ass~larxe If
hairs
reason hours air~rt,
o(8 at
an~g of SJILE
Conddions
panel
laation
of
hestate
12 tr
12
hoes
from
~oposal.
site,
8
OF
or
and
any
Parking, installation not
bled trs
Frid~
to
VYEG personal
condftfons
access
job
conven~r~e. of &startup in
period e[cess do
period
a be
to
10
a
exceed &Holidays
in exceed
ofthis
Up
~dfromthe
satisfaction
to
Taxis, — vapors (i.e.
Terms
to
obsite
to
regardess om
date
j used
to
employee
hWr
hour p
ft
design
date 4
U 4
Accomrrpda~ions ear6e~
please
not
not
2 be
2 Trainrg
CONDITION
Monday
igMswill
and
and
fl
company
WEG
5imday's ~la~s
etc,
your
Airtares. required ~stoyo~x time to
Fbtel
lars.
Saturday
or
d
fromthe
all
AND at
Basis Parr~sky
destinatiari
mo
calculated
he
rre
~rvice, se t
inTorarito.
daysirom
ti
to
eekda~+s—Time wrork atirda~—Timein cars,
terms worktlme U
and
hotel 1JA
S
W
ield
produclswill
ny
here (30) hce ERMS as hrther
~~ F
months, otal
information
Char
A T
T
d T
irr~pedesthe
MfiA
Travel
irYamatbn
dayscredi
Distance to
Renal
12
American
you
such
StandardVJ Stock Tororko
Extra 30 control Thirty in
Road
wth isfor
mited
Ontario li
costs
attached
WEG
Inc.
adjuslmentswThh
Rates:
are
Time
Samor
period
and
Parking
oror6o
64
T
(standard)
(specian
Rate
opportunity
required,
Canada
quoted ekvery:
alidly: a/m~t erms: rice:
.O.B.: ares: Service
~OASK4WE0
above
is
T D F
P V P
Standtry T applicade,
Rate
Rafe
J tf~s
warranty
clazification,
yours,
ems
it Fieid
Service
Time Cordova
Transpod!
offender.
TraNel
The
All
Iftravel Where
EG
trustthe
asic
oIIFree1
vertime
vertime oldover
vernight
further ravel
uto
ublic ats
e ime
- W T
B
O
O J.Pamensky - t - -
H incerely O r iscussng lfonso
T
A
P
r
o d W S
A V
3J4
air
Pam: ou[
~d
Ilrrtit,
from
dher
Vector Press
ramps,
speed,
energy
0..20mA
carnplete
optionaQ,
distance
harmful
b~787-46t7
1
irdernal
corrpiance
E
parameters,
V
output
autariation
currem
the loss,
multi
lifting,
(416)781-4352 (41
with
actance) parties,
operation
ifthe motor,
arid Votage
resuting
consequential
board
t,
re
ectemal
outputs.
boards),
or Only
of
0..10
frame enab~
1 fi
operation,
adjustable
thrd crane
oulpul analog
Phase
line
and
bit,
of supplied
through
reactor
control
Read
profs, storage,
gases
Fa~1t
heatsink
speed
10
damages
head
the
a
a~pansion
of
load
of
circut,
inputs
standard+ people, elechonic
inputs,
hours
VJFtr V
of
tercttinals~
0cternal electronic
of an
Over
to
as
Group,
a~ustable
Phone: Pr~esso: mdor, floc: Over navigate
loss
the
for
r~ither
Ink
dig~al
PLC 0..70
power
resolution fan, urat
corrosives
need independently
analog
the
on
status,
of for
DC
bit,
braking albw
need
outputs
in
the
no
History
monitoring
the
adjustable
sink
maintenance au
with
in
is to 11
UL508C
inputs DC replacemerd
dr'ae
(no
whatsoever external Machines,
~atus irrto
nputs,
ava~ablewdh
claims
Hz),
frequencies,
heat
Faun
equpment,
2!
or
Digital
compensatron,
hequency
and
negatke
there —
and
IGBT's 4
or
buiM 60
Overload
internal
the rat~g
4
ambfem levy, any skip
improper analog
/ deceleration
Paper
of
slip
lability
irrternet,
D
digital
antl
in
resolution
and
in
VFD
or
harmonics 50
and de—
brakng TERMS
A, provided
changes
the
and
three size voltage
product swicha~g
VDC
1
encoder.
Fault
feet} motor
vdta~ IGBTs,
settir~,
60947—
NIEG
Applications,
24
positive Wnders,
communrcatan
a
oulpuls, the
limitartion,
functions~ithout
the
from
(stator
protection
DC
UndedOvervotage
the additional Language.
operated limits,
frame
IEC {330
rect~ier to d
Optimal
VAC! to
repaKs,
obligation regarding
IGBT's
Net
n the
IitFrature currerA,
to boost,
output, or Basic
progammeble,
fWl
free
to V4RRANTY
to
no in 4fl~tr
wih
anth
240 analog
isWated
special
vr~ar
W
pararreter up, circul,
option)
withoN
the or
(Up
~celeration meters
fa
version,
pov~2r
programming
Extruders,
—
oNp
at
Device resi~or, -ins
an
(IGBTs,
have
torque
Selectable
frequency etc
permAs connected
100
Overload
inputs
1JA
"S" create
as Connection
fundbns outputs
plug nomiel PLC
DP, frequency,
wit
Start to
speeds
Brak~g
oulpul insulation,
requirements
conned
to request
nca►ed
functbr~s, circuN
Ifrrited
software corrpliance prograrrmrg parameter): smiled: (1000m)attitudewithout
loadable
as
includng
braking
M6A up is
group,
the
and
V.J.Pamensky
5oR
nAuences. inverter
ft digital relay
in is
al~mwarning VFD
1 braking,
bad is
user
inputs,
not Br~ir~g upon
resistor,
speed, adjustade
(via vra
short
Incorrect
CorMeyors,
Prdbus Canada
the
(aaatlable Roatl
and
caner rrator Onerded
3300
DC
Dynamic
standard DC
programmng
but
irnerter
OvercurrentlShort
dtt~
,
Ontario
rn~ag~nenl in adjustable
Linear
motor
External
operation,
preselected
(symrietricaly corbition,
aNaas available
-irk; frequencies
standard rwt
Canada
Motor
AWEG
duty
Fans,
and 8
brakng costs functions, functior5,
protection
parameters ground
the
kl-p
avalade
as S~rwt prograrrrnable
Mom: rrbdule installadais, sel~tion 50°C difl'erenti~
atmospheric
rrenirrum
to
Menu
fault SensoriessVectorandVedorwithEncoder
software
SIcQ
to (bait prdect to oronto
4
control resporsiWYty
indication
does
to the include, Pamensky
Certifications capabiNties, VYEG
6 T
or
thermal ~
labor specifications, language
verter
~rtwiredterrrdnals to
Boards 10.0 Features:
function
m and negNgert
Input
incAactas J
in
Pro~arcming,
Braking Features: Pumps, Capabil~ies: snit
RTU or mode
-10
~OASK drive
CE
o
Backup Drne readngs: V.J.
are~toad capabilties
features Phase
1 isolated
merrory
isolated,
purrp Temperature
(1NWj,
5.0
IEC61000-312
outputs. PLC
lirrc
speed
-485 the
relator,
warrarrty
warranty
WEG cUL,
Rh
EG G
ptirrral ...20rrW.
prograrrrriable prograrrrriable roup, non
rrtelhgent non
rograrrrurg emperature. ver verload
aximum rotectNe technical
a I 4 Fee easurement, DC w Mota larm, isplay Protectionswthiaut eeders, Soft t RS Encoder 2.5! g Prograrcmirg O p Passrord Super Braking MuAi rxorrect O Control igtal
Modbus W Specific Selectable ocaUr~e Fhash roduct. 1 quipmerds amages rom 2 f 2 8 lectrochemcal O O P I a Control m I MuRi
J PID F Applications If m ncorrect D Braking Ambier~: Expansgn d UL, f Father
p
e d The i o e The
oll
-
T - - -
-
- -
- •
-
-
- -
------
-
-
- - - -
- - - -
-
-
- Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 59 of 62
the
the
to
still
to
a
duct
fan
Since
plant,
can This
SCR
technically
new,
access
gas
side
following
the
above,
the
stack
for
the
of
flue below.
the
booster
found
particularly
reactor.
south
in
regularly, it's is
as
eliminated.
side
flow
above
the
SCR
locating
existing
be
sketched
90°,
Concerns
sketches
of for
shown
to
AOP4
the
as
south
the
as
of
of replaced
the
including
directly
the
open.
horizontal
and
in
turned
be
shows
top
at
side
SCR
reactor
to
fan
the
reactor on
advantage
Advantech
being located
needed.
The
remain
SCR
shown
by
south
is
need
SCR
be
The
from
as
stack
fan.
the
booster
the
Advantech
retrofitted
when
the
may
would
new
on
by
stack.
be
stream
SCR
should
proposed
required
ensured
the
booster
SCR
gas
can
AOP4
which
is
new
claim
removal
stack
of
turn and
underneath
existing SCR
the
new
SCR
the
underneath design
side
this
easy
new
90°
side
the
the
the that
new
the
of
to
inlet
a
of
reactor
the the
to such
exchangers,
fact
directly north
between
placement the
for and
SCR
that
stack
north
Therefore,
the
fan
the
heat its on
run
location
fan,
the
flow
similarly
allow
side.
and
overcomes
to
along
duct
the
and
existing
namely
boaster
side
fan
concluded
for
including
the
diameters
vertical
outlet
lanes
SCR
platform,
design
directly
ANP,
straight
design,
the
either the
duct
inherently
AOP4
from
by
the
it
silencer SCR
on
the
traffic
for
of
fan
into
centrifugal
a
run
at
five
a
the
elevated as
that
true
side
since centrifugal
of
well
Advantech.
duct stack
is
a
making
retained
acts
new
by
greater
a
case,
north
very
centrifugal
locating
ensure of
connections
same
also
on
is
of
placing
simply
existing straight
this
the
selection
a
the
in
by
works
for
would
the
consultant
length
proposed
be
which
Location:
a Location:
Flanged
along
fan,
feature
This
installed
correct
This
and
duct
from
Fan
SCR
ideally
alternative
be
would
the
reactor,
an
maintained
distinct
ith
dvantageous
llows ould
ketches. oming . dvantech,
CR ut
orth
entrifugal
traight easible quipment e
2.
A emovable.
a 3 c a ocation.
W s
f
s S c
b A n
w l b
r
e Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 60 of 62 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 61 of 62 Case 4:17-cv-00612-RCC Document 3 Filed 12/20/17 Page 62 of 62
is
any
a gas
an
I
by
as
bottom
stack
avoid
resistance
equipped
to
the
SCR
used
exhaust
is
I
at
is
pressure
least
the
existing
order
of
controlled
all
which
in
back
is
stack
the
path
of
stack.
fan
used
maintained
motor, the
is
existing
possible
fan
bottom
existing
an equipment,
booster
any
follows
ID
the
the
commonly
case
pressure
at
of
is
booster
In
The
installed
always
ID
fan
lower
eliminates
open.
gas
the
draught
bypass.
equipment
booster
bypass
slightly
open
additionally
exhaust
remains
natural
(ID)
regulates
use
very
plant
the
open the
a the
existing
MW
the
large
of
plant. stack
draft
control
or
almost
The
which
downstream
700
than
Since
very
These
and
through
power
same
rates
used.
new
over
existing
existing
successfully
stack,
induced
upstream
out
these
that
the
the boiler
an
the
flow
the
well
stronger
balance
ofiten
gas
in
of concepts. AOP4
diligence
path
ideally
operation.
that
that on
constant
to
coal-fired
existing
AOP4.
plant
a
also
so
cases
gas
due
tying fact
of
always
is volume
through the
bypass
exhaust
the
current
of
the
concept
gas
difficult power
upstream
some
Nitrogen's
(VFD),
to
path recommended
being
the
simply
advanced
in stack"
equipment
maintain
system
open
this is
flue
by
within
It
fan
more to
drive
flow
bottom
despite
bypass
with
most
independent
and
small
Apache
"burp pushes
applications.
makes
coal-fired
The
the
Concept: feature
much compared
a
and
critical
units
own fan
open
at realized
booster
changes
than
in term
concept
is
are downstream
its
an ID
which
frequency
capacity
stack
by-pass
the application.
Bypass
of
country
damper.
largest
the
the
equally
booster
greater
of
this
bypass
indicator pressure bypass
the pressure
comparatively AOP4,
open
any the
ID
systems
generating
conduct
into
Open
variable
in existing
in
least
bypass,
for of
a
to
the
concept
is the
gas
times
generating at open
open
the
these
it
ithout ith
n pen he
ossible is
ressure
nd oncerns
f lants
lectric
et ucked NPI ome
n
00 egative
he han s
uited p
lue
T 4. o p w c A
w
t
p
o a
n s
S e
1 I
n
t t
a
f A
s o