DOCSLIB.ORG

MN ENG 56 01.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Paunović: We Are Sombor Finances Continuously and Councils of National Consistently Implementing Minorities, One Measures That Are Million Dinars Improving Minority Rights Earmarked 56 Minority NewsAugust 2019 Bošnjak: Legal Solutions Have Been Significantly Improved Highest Amount Slovak Folk Festivities: 100 Granted for Roma Years With the People, In Culture the People, For the People HIGHLIGHTS EDITORIALEDITORIAL 4956 SomborGovernment Finances Committed Councils to of NationalImproving theMinorities, Status One Million Dinars The Merge(Not) of the the Traditional choice? and the ofEarmarked Minority Rights There is a bit more thanContemporary a month left until the elections for members On September 6, the Director of the Go- of national councils of national minorities. The members of the Thevernment City of OfficeSombor for willHuman fund and councils Minority of We22 nationalcan rightly minorities say that August will be was exercising full of events their rightin which to elect members their nationalRights, Suzana minorities, Paunović, metwith witha total the OSCEof one ofrepresentatives. national minorities The first played precondition a key role. for votingNeither is the to tropicalenrol in theheat millionHigh Commissioner dinars allocated for National for this Minorities, year. This norSpecial the Voters’ vacations List for prevented National Minorities.them from Accordingdevoting tothemselves the website to is the first time that the work of national the organization of numerous events, thus marking their national Lamberto Zannier, and she informed him communitiesabout the implementation has been ofsupported the activities in holidays.of the Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-Government, thisof the way Action and Planthe conditionsfor the Realization are ofmet the by the conclusion of the Special Voter List will be done 15 days before theRights Hungarian, of National Croatian, Minorities. German and Onthe the elections, second onweekend October of 19.August, Whether the holiday the call was of themarked Ministry by the of Bunjevac minorities. Allocating funds SlovaksPublic Administration in Bački Petrovac. and other This year, government Slovak national bodies to festivities the members were to finance the work of national coun- dedicatedof the national to the minorities centenary to of register their founding in the Special and the Voters’ cultural List and will cils is a legal obligation, but few local artisticbear fruit program will be clearin the after hall thisof the date, Slovak because, Vojvodina with theTheater exception was de- governments have fulfilled it. Sombor Hosts "Europe dicatedof the few to thenational arrival councils of Slovaks that to active the Lowerly propagate Earth. The the presenceimportance of provincialof voters’ officials,registration led and by elections,Provincial othersPrime haveMinister not Igor yet includedMirović, as in My City" Conference wellit in theas the agenda. presence of the Prime Minister of the Slovak Republic, A Book of Poetry by Peter Pelegrini, testified to the importance of this holiday. Onthe September Consul 20, Sombor General hosted the "Europeof By October 19, all those who aim to be in one of the national in MyBulgaria City" conference Promoted on protection and in exer- ThecouncilsI same can weekend submit was their celebrated lists. By thein families conclusion of Islamic of this denomina issue, the- cise of human and minority rights. The confe- Republic Electoral Commission approved 20 electoral lists of 11 rence was organizedNishville by the German Foundation tion. Kurban Bajram was congratulated by the Prime Minister, the "Konrad Adenauer", in cooperation with the Primenational Minister, minorities. and manyIt is difficult ministers, to forecast who showed how many that alllists citizens will be TheCity collectionof Sombor and of thepoetry German “Hidden Association Sen- ofregistered, the state but,were on equally the b importantasis of the to approved them. ones, it iszbog evident toga ses”"Gerhard" by Consul Sombor. General of the Republic thatš there are deep divisions in some national communities. For of Bulgaria in Niš, Edvin Sugarev, his Theyinstance, also the showed Ruthenian this at community, the celebration which, of althoughthe national being holidays a less first book in Serbian, was promoted ofnumerous Bunjevacs community and Hungarians. (according The to central the last celebration census, 14,246 of Dužijanca citizens on August 9, as a part of the literary Daydeclared - one asof membersthe four holidays of this community) of što the uzdišemo Bunjevac already zanational „starletama“ has 4 electoralminority koje - program of the Nisville Jazz Festival. was held on 15 August. The following week, the Hungarian national The Consul General of the Republic of lists,s while in the previous elections in 2014 they had a total of 7 minoritylists. The celebratedreasons behind its holiday. this division St. Istvan are, of course,Hungary dissatisfaction was marked Bulgaria further said that the book of by a formal ceremony in Novi Sad. poetry and its promotion in Nishville with the existing situation in the community, desires and plans are a logical consequence of his many Thesefor its improvement,manifestations, or somethingas well as else.many Onother the events other hand,that are a more held years of cultural cooperation with Niš, Certificates Awarded to throughoutnumerous community the year, send - the a clear Slovak message community that members – has, for ofthe mino time- NKC and Nišville. Participants in the Summer ritiesbeing, cherishonly two the lists memory registered. of their Those ancestors, who believe their traditions, that factions but School "We and alsowithin that a theycommunity are oriented are detrimental towards creating for the something overall interests new, con of- temporary.the community Numerous as a whole projects would to be say funded that thisby the is a Budget good sign, Fund but, for theMembers Others. of Overcoming the CES the Borders" Minoritieswhat is interesting also support about this. these Tradition lists is cannotthat they be bothescaped, come however, from “Carpathians” from Vrbas wethe have same repeatedly political party,witnessed i.e., thatthe leadingtradition candidates can also be on presented the lists at the Ukrainian Lemko inare a membersmodern way. of the By same merging dominant the traditional political party. and Willcontemporary these and Participants in the Summer School of In- terethnic,Culture Intercultural Festival and Inter-Con- minorities,similar situations they makesay that the they voters’ are decisionsnot “cocooned easier orcommunities” more com- that stick to the old, tried-and-true recipe, but that they are also fessional Dialogue (AID), held at Srebrno plicated? OnJezero, August were 1, awardedamateurs diplomas of the “Carpat for suc-- turned to contemporary creativity, which, at least in our country, hians”cessful Cultural completion and of Educational activities in aSociety week- is not often tied to members of minorities. fromlong Vrbasseminar traveled held from to Ukraine August to 26 per to- form at the 20th International Lemko 30 different national minorities live in Serbia September 1 under the title "We and Culturethe Others. Festival Overcoming “Bells of theLemko”, Borders.” held in Monastirsk from August 2-4. On the margins of the festival, the meeting of the Presidency of the World Federation of Ukrainian-Lemko Associations was alsoPromotion held. of the Book "Stories from Diaspora and Saint Homeland Stephen of Countries" Hungary Celebrated The book "Stories from Diaspora and Home- Theland formal Countries" ceremony, by Admir with Lisica the was presence promoted in the Bosniak National Council on September of Provincial officials and representatives 15. of the National Council of the Hungarian NationalThe book Minority,is about people marked who St. began Stephen their e er for all (István)journey of to Hungary, Diaspora theafter Hungarian the end of thenati Se-- and ONE newsl onalcond holiday, World inWar, Novi but Sad also onabout August successful 21. St. BosniaksIstván is from celebrated the homeland as the countries founder in ofthe Christianityregion. in Hungary, the founder of the Hungarian state, and the first unifier www.minoritynews.rs of all Hungarians. Minority News Portal OUR INTERVIEW: IVAN BOŠNJAK, STATE SECRETARY OF THE MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT LEGAL SOLUTIONS HAVE BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED he protection of the rights of national minorities is of particular importance for each country. Our country is making great efforts in this area, and special emphasis is placed on relations with neighbouring coun- tries, with intergovernmental mixed committees playing a key role in this regard. Three intergovernmental T committees are currently active: with Croatia, Romania, and Hungary, and all three are co-chaired by our interlocutor Ivan Bošnjak, State Secretary of the Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self-Government. We spoke with Secretary Bošnjak about the results of the work of these bodies, as well as about the situation in the Bosniak National Council. Intergovernmental mixed committees of these committees and the most with Romania. There is also a signed on national minority issues, which ex- significant results that have emerged agreement with the Republic of North- ist as a mechanism to promote further from this increased engagement in the ern Macedonia on establishment of minority rights in
Recommended publications
  • Hungary's Policy Towards Its Kin Minorities

    Hungary's Policy Towards Its Kin Minorities

    Hungary’s policy towards its kin minorities: The effects of Hungary’s recent legislative measures on the human rights situation of persons belonging to its kin minorities Óscar Alberto Lema Bouza Supervisor: Prof. Zsolt Körtvélyesi Second Semester University: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, Budapest, Hungary Academic Year 2012/2013 Óscar A. Lema Bouza Abstract Abstract: This thesis focuses on the recent legislative measures introduced by Hungary aimed at kin minorities in the neighbouring countries. Considering as relevant the ones with the largest Hungarian minorities (i.e. Croatia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia and Ukraine), the thesis starts by presenting the background to the controversy, looking at the history, demographics and politics of the relevant states. After introducing the human rights standards contained in international and national legal instruments for the protection of minorities, the thesis looks at the reasons behind the enactment of the laws. To do so the politically dominant concept of Hungarian nation is examined. Finally, the author looks at the legal and political restrictions these measures face from the perspective of international law and the reactions of the affected countries, respectively. The research shows the strong dependency between the measures and the political conception of the nation, and points out the lack of amelioration of the human rights situation of ethnic Hungarians in the said countries. The reason given for this is the little effects produced on them by the measures adopted by Hungary and the potentially prejudicial nature of the reaction by the home states. The author advocates for a deeper cooperation between Hungary and the home states. Keywords: citizenship, ethnic preference, Fundamental Law, home state, human rights, Hungary, kin state, minorities, nation, Nationality Law, preferential treatment,Status Law.
  • Treatment of Ethnic Albanians Living in the Presevo Valley, Vojvodina And

    Treatment of Ethnic Albanians Living in the Presevo Valley, Vojvodina And

    Home > Research > Responses to Information Requests RESPONSES TO INFORMATION REQUESTS (RIRs) New Search | About RIR's | Help 04 March 2005 SCG43300.E Serbia and Montenegro: Treatment of ethnic Albanians living in the Presevo Valley, Vojvodina and Sandjak region of Serbia by the state, and by society in general (January 2003-February 2005) Research Directorate, Immigration and Refugee Board, Ottawa A legal adviser from the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia stated that her organization had not noted any major human rights violations against ethnic Albanians in the Presevo Valley, where they form the majority of the population (28 Feb. 2005). The legal adviser indicated that there are other ethnic minorities, but not many Albanians, living in Vojvodina (Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia 28 Feb. 2005). In Sandzak, "Bosnians, not Albanians" are the main minority group (ibid.). Country Reports 2004 provides further details on the ethnic composition of the two regions: "In Vojvodina, the Hungarian minority constituted approximately 15 percent of the population, and many regional political offices were held by ethnic Hungarians. In the Sandzak, Bosniaks controlled the municipal governments of Novi Pazar, Tutin, and Sjenica, and Prijepolje". (28 Feb. 2005 Sec. 3) The March 2003 report to the Council of Europe by the Voivodina Center for Human Rights did not include ethnic Albanians in Voivodina as one of the region's minorities, which include Croats, Hungarians, Roma, Romanians, Ruthenians and Slovaks. An article in Le Courrier des Balkans stated that Vojvodina had a record of non-violent cohabitation among its close to 30 different minorities, but that between 2003 and 2004 ethnic incidents had occurred, mostly directed at Croats and Hungarians (25 Sept.
  • Investigative Mission By

    Investigative Mission By

    FACT-FINDING MISSION BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AD HOC DELEGATION TO VOÏVODINA AND BELGRADE (29-31 JANUARY 2005) REPORT Brussels, 2 March 2005 DV\559830EN.doc PE 350.475 EN EN CONTENTS Page I.INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 3 II.THE EVENTS......................................................................................................... 5 III.CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................... 11 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................. 13 PE 350.475 2/20 DV\559830EN.doc EN I. INTRODUCTION Voïvodina, a region in Northern Serbia, is the southern part of the Pannonian plane, bordering with Croatia on the west, Romania on the east and Hungary to the north. The surface area is 21,506 km2, almost as large as Slovenia, with two million inhabitants of some twenty different nationalities. At the end of the IXth century, the Hungarians colonised Voïvodina, which became part of the Kingdom of Hungary and stayed so until the Turkish occupation in 1529. When the latter ended at the turn of the XVII-XVIIIth centuries, Voïvodina was part of the Kingdom of Hungary until 1918. The region's inter-ethnic complexity is rooted in the XVIIIth century Habsburg policy of repopulation, which brought in people from the various nationalities that made up their empire at the time: Serbians fleeing Ottoman rule, Croatians, Hungarians, Germans, Slovaks, Ruthenes, etc. The events of 1848-49 had repercussions in Voïvodina, which was transformed into a region enjoying a modicum of autonomy, with the Emperor François-Joseph bearing the title Voïvode. It was then joined to Hungary in 1860, and then the Austro-Hungarian empire in 1867. Within the Compromise of 1867, Austria and Hungary undertook to treat all the various nationalities on an equal basis, and recognised the equality of all the empire's languages in schools, the administration and public life.
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed

    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
  • Is the Population Census a Reliable Source of Data for Ethno-Demographic Research?

    Is the Population Census a Reliable Source of Data for Ethno-Demographic Research?

    From ethno-statistics to ethno-politics - Is the population census a reliable source of data for ethno-demographic research? Dr Aleksandar Knežević University of Belgrade Faculty of Geography, Department of DEMOGRAPHY Methodological problems of the Census ethno- statistic data 1. The influence of national policies • An illusion of the ethnic monolithicity of the Kingdom of the SHS / Yugoslavia; • Effect of the so-called new methodological solutions to ethnographic records to create new and unclear ethno-national modalities / identities; • Politization of the censuses in the function of national counting and ethnic dispersion through targeted stratification of existing nationalities. 2. The impact of using the subjective criteria as the official principle of national identification • The occurrence of ethnical dissimulation and ethnic transfer; • Disagreement between real ethnic and declared nationality; • The emergence of flotant ethnic groups in which variability is present in declaring their national, linguistic and religious identity; • Expressed alterophony (disproportion of nationally declared (persons) in regard to mother tongue). 3. The problem of categorization of minorities • ethnic minorities, national minorities, ethnic groups, nationalities, national groups (gradation in the function of ideological and political influence: nation-nationality-ethnic group) 1948 1953 1961 1971 1981 1991 2002 2011 Srbi Srbi Srbi Srbi Srbi Srbi Srbi Srbi Šiptari Šiptari Albanci Albanci Albanci Albanci Albanci Albanci Austrijanci Austrijanci Austrijanci
  • Serbia by Misha Savic

    Serbia by Misha Savic

    Serbia by Misha Savic Capital: Belgrade Population: 7.2 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$11,430 Source: The data above are drawn from the World Bank’sWorld Development Indicators 2014. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Electoral Process 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Civil Society 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25 Independent Media 3.25 3.25 3.50 3.75 3.75 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 National Democratic Governance 4.00 4.00 3.75 4.00 4.00 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Local Democratic Governance 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 3.50 Judicial Framework and Independence 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Corruption 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 Democracy Score 3.75 3.71 3.68 3.79 3.79 3.71 3.64 3.64 3.64 3.64 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
  • Eight Fragments Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian

    Eight Fragments Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian

    EIGHT FRAGMENTS FROM THE WORLD OF MONTENEGRIN LANGUAGES AND SERBIAN, CROATIAN, SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN AND FROM THE WORLD OF MONTENEGRIN EIGHT FRAGMENTS LANGUAGES Pavel Krejčí PAVEL KREJČÍ PAVEL Masaryk University Brno 2018 EIGHT FRAGMENTS FROM THE WORLD OF SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN AND MONTENEGRIN LANGUAGES Selected South Slavonic Studies 1 Pavel Krejčí Masaryk University Brno 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this e-book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission of copyright administrator which can be contacted at Masaryk University Press, Žerotínovo náměstí 9, 601 77 Brno. Scientific reviewers: Ass. Prof. Boryan Yanev, Ph.D. (Plovdiv University “Paisii Hilendarski”) Roman Madecki, Ph.D. (Masaryk University, Brno) This book was written at Masaryk University as part of the project “Slavistika mezi generacemi: doktorská dílna” number MUNI/A/0956/2017 with the support of the Specific University Research Grant, as provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic in the year 2018. © 2018 Masarykova univerzita ISBN 978-80-210-8992-1 ISBN 978-80-210-8991-4 (paperback) CONTENT ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 1 SOUTH SLAVONIC LANGUAGES (GENERAL OVERVIEW) ............................... 9 CHAPTER 2 SELECTED CZECH HANDBOOKS OF SERBO-CROATIAN
  • Serbia & Montenegro

    Serbia & Montenegro

    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : SERBIA & MONTENEGRO Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 27 September, 2005) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin de Balexert, 7-9 1219 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 8 IDPS FROM KOSOVO: STUCK BETWEEN UNCERTAIN RETURN PROSPECTS AND DENIAL OF LOCAL INTEGRATION 8 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND 12 BACKGROUND 12 THE CONFLICT IN KOSOVO (1981-1999): INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FINALLY IMPOSES AUTONOMY OF THE PROVINCE TO YUGOSLAV AUTHORITIES 12 OUSTING OF PRESIDENT MILOSEVIC OPENS NEW ERA OF DEMOCRACY (2000-2003) 14 DJINDJIC ASSASSINATION THREATENS CONTINUATION OF SERBIA’S REFORMS (2003) 15 KOSOVO UNDER INTERNATIONAL ADMINISTRATION (2003) 16 BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT IN SOUTHERN SERBIA (2000-2005) 18 UNCERTAINTY AROUND FINAL STATUS ISSUE HAS A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON DISPLACEMENT AND RETURN (2005) 21 CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 23 DISPLACEMENT BEFORE AND DURING NATO INTERVENTION (1998-1999) 23 MASSIVE RETURN OF KOSOVO ALBANIANS SINCE END OF NATO INTERVENTION (FROM JUNE 1999) 26 LARGE SCALE DISPLACEMENT OF ETHNIC MINORITIES FOLLOWING THE NATO INTERVENTION (1999) 26 DISPLACEMENT CAUSED BY
  • UNDP RS NARS and Indepen

    UNDP RS NARS and Indepen

    The National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia Serbia AND INDEPENDENT BODIES SERBIA THE REPUBLIC OF OF ASSEMBLY NATIONAL NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES 253 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA AND INDEPENDENT BODIES Materials from the Conference ”National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia and Independent Bodies” Belgrade, 26-27 November 2009 and an Overview of the Examples of International Practice Olivera PURIĆ UNDP Deputy Resident Representative a.i. Edited by Boris ČAMERNIK, Jelena MANIĆ and Biljana LEDENIČAN The following have participated: Velibor POPOVIĆ, Maja ŠTERNIĆ, Jelena MACURA MARINKOVIĆ Translated by: Novica PETROVIĆ Isidora VLASAK English text revised by: Charles ROBERTSON Design and layout Branislav STANKOVIĆ Copy editing Jasmina SELMANOVIĆ Printing Stylos, Novi Sad Number of copies 150 in English language and 350 in Serbian language For the publisher United Nations Development Programme, Country Office Serbia Internacionalnih brigada 69, 11000 Beograd, +381 11 2040400, www.undp.org.rs ISBN – 978-86-7728-125-0 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations and the United Nations Development Programme. Acknowledgement We would like to thank all those whose hard work has made this publication possible. We are particularly grateful for the guidance and support of the National Assembly of the Republic of Serbia, above all from the Cabinet of the Speaker and the Secretariat. A special debt of gratitude is owed to the representatives of the independent regulatory bodies; the Commissioner for Information of Public Importance and Personal Data Protection, the State Audit Institution, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Serbia and the Anti-corruption Agency.
  • The National Councils of National Minorities in Serbia

    The National Councils of National Minorities in Serbia

    The national councils of national minorities in Serbia Katinka Beretka* and István Gergő Székely** January 2016 Recommended citation: Beretka Katinka and Székely István Gergő, “The national councils of national minorities in the Republic of Serbia”, Online Compendium Autonomy Arrangements in the World, January 2016, at www.world-autonomies.info. © 2016 Autonomy Arrangements in the World Content 1. Essential Facts and Figures 2. Autonomy in the Context of the State Structure 3. Establishment and Implementation of Autonomy 4. Legal Basis of Autonomy 5. Autonomous Institutions 6. Autonomous Powers 7. Financial Arrangements 8. Intergovernmental Relations 9. Inter-group Relations within the Autonomous Entity (not applicable) 10. Membership, “Quasi-citizenship” and Special Rights 11. General Assessment and Outlook Bibliography 2016 © Autonomy Arrangements in the World Project 1. Essential Facts and Figures 1 Serbia is located in the center of the Balkans, being an everyday subject of world news from the beginning of the 1990s, often due to ethnicity-related issues, ranging from civil war and secession to autonomy arrangements meant to accommodate ethnocultural diversity. Although according to the 2011 census almost 20% of the total population of the state (without Kosovo) belong to a minority group (see Table 1), in Serbia there are no officially recognized or unrecognized minorities. There is neither an exact enumeration of minority groups, nor clear principles to be followed about how a minority should be recognized. While the absence of precise regulations may be regarded as problematic, the approach of Serbia to the minority question can also be interpreted as being rather liberal, which may have resulted from the intention to protect ethnic Serb refugees who have become minorities abroad, including in the former Yugoslav member states.
  • Preuzmite Publikaciju

    Preuzmite Publikaciju

    Institute for Political Studies UDC 811.163.41:323.1(=163.41) Serbian Political Thought Manuscript received: 19.05.2011. No. 2/2011, Accepted for publishing: 02.08.2011. Year III, Vol. 4 Scientific polemics pp. 121-141 Momčilo Subotić1 Institute for Political Studies, Belgrade The Renewal of Serbistics Introduction It is known, from the researches conducted by many public opinion agencies, that most Serbs and other citizens of Serbia are inclined to- wards Serbia’s accession to the European Union. However, things have gone a step backwards today compared to the nineties; no one in the Serbian politics, or in the key national institutions, such as the SANU (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts), Matica srpska and others, is even trying to conduct the analyses of Serbian defeats, to face the wrong ideas of Yugoslavism and Yugoslav politics and state. Without scientifically based and critical analyses of the status of Serbian nation and its state’s state constituencies, no further European integrations are possible. In other words, until the time when the Serbian political and intellectual leadership is finished with the Yugoslav era of its history, and realize and correct all the historical forgeries and counterfeits it was based on, the European integrations on an equal basis and by Eu- ropean standards will not happen. It is likely that the Serbian leader- ship, for the umpteenth time in the recent history, cannot overcome the excess history which, in the Balkan’s „barrel of gun-powder“ has always been too much. The Serbs have to answer the question of what happened to the Ser- bian national identity in the Yugoslav state to themselves first; do the European standards for entering „the family“ of the European nations, based on the linguistic definition of a nation, also stand for the Serbian people, being multi-confessional such as some other European nations (Germans, Hungarians, Аlbanians etc.).
  • Contemporary Russian-Serbian Relations

    Contemporary Russian-Serbian Relations

    1 Contemporary Russian-Serbian Relations: Interviews with Youth from Political Parties in Belgrade and Vojvodina By Chloe Kay Department of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Colorado Boulder Defended March 31, 2014 Primary Advisor Rimgaila Salys, Dept. of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Committee Members Tatiana Mikhailova, Dept. of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Laura Osterman, Dept. of Germanic and Slavic Languages and Literatures Laurel Rodd, Dept. of Asian Languages and Civilizations 2 Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………..5 Historical Relations between Serbia and Russia………………………………………….7 Relations in the Middle Ages to 2008……………………………………………..7 Political Relations 2008-today………………………………………………………..11 Cultural Ties……………………………………………………………………………………13 Energy and Economics……………………………………………………………………14 Serbia in between East and West……………………………………………………15 The Opinions of Two Experts………………………………………………………………………17 Data Collection and Results………………………….….………………………………………….23 The history of Russian and Serbian Relations………………………….……….23 Russia as an International Actor in the World and the in Balkans…..25 Russia and Serbia: 200 million………………………………………………………...28 South Stream Pipeline: A gift or a scam?.………………………………………..30 Serbia: Caught in the Middle?………………………………………………………….31 Vladimir Putin and the Kosovo Question………………………………………….34 Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………………………35