DOCSLIB.ORG

Scheme for National CSR Awards 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Government of India Ministry of Corporate Affairs Scheme for National CSR Awards 2018 August 2018 National CSR Award 2018 1. Objectives of National CSR Awards (NCSRA) NCSRA seeks to: - increase competition in various categories of companies to infuse excellence in their CSR activities - encourage companies to spend the entire amount i.e. eligible CSR spend - recognize the impact, innovation, usage of technology, gender and environment issues, sustainability, scalability and replicability of CSR activities - channelize CSR activities of corporate so that the benefits of their activities reach the marginalized sections of society and in remote areas of the country 2. Mode of entry Mode of entry in NCSRA will be through nomination. The following categories of organizations are competent to nominate companies: - Ministries/ Departments of Govt of India - State &Union Territories (UT) Governments - Professional institutions: ICSI, ICAI, ICMAI - National Level Trade and Industry Bodies/ Chambers: CII, FICCI, ASSOCHAM, PHDCCI, SIDBI, FISME, Laghu Udyog Bharti A nominating organization can nominate up to a total of 10 entries in all categories of Awards. Companies may directly submit their application/s in a suitable category to these organizations. 3. Total number of awards: Up to 20 Page 2 of 27 4. Categories of Awards 4.1 Corporate Awards for Excellence in CSR: Recognition to a company based on total eligible CSR Spend (up to four awards): - Companies having eligible CSR Spend equal and above Rs 100 crores - Companies having eligible CSR Spend between Rs 10 crores and Rs 99.99 crores - Companies having eligible CSR Spend between Rs 1 crore and Rs 9.99 crores - Companies having eligible CSR Spend below Rs 1 crore Honourable mention: In addition to four main awards, there may be four honourable mentions of companies, which have undertaken appreciable CSR activities. 4.2 Corporate Awards in CSR in Challenging Circumstances: Recognition to a company based on its CSR efforts in challenging circumstances, Aspirational Districts, difficult terrains/ disturbed areas, etc. (up to five awards*): - North - North East - East - West - South * One Award is earmarked for MSME only. CSR intervention/s, in alignment with Category Objective/s, carried out by Small & Medium Enterprise within the definition of Section 135 of Companies Act 2013 & rules there in, shall be considered for National CSR Awards in this Category. Honourable mention: In addition to five main awards, there may be five honourable mentions for companies which have undertaken appreciable CSR activities. 4.3 Upto Eleven Awards* to be chosen based on contribution to National Priority Areas so as to motivate corporates to spend in these areas. The priority areas are as presented in Annexure I. National Priority Page 3 of 27 Areas, as reflected through important schemes of Government of India is placed at Annexure – II. * Two Awards are earmarked for MSME only. CSR intervention/s, in alignment with Category Objective/s, carried out by Small & Medium Enterprise within the definition of Section 135 of Companies Act 2013 & rules there in, shall be considered for National CSR Awards in this Category. Honourable mention: In addition to eleven main awards, there may be eleven honourable mentions of companies which have undertaken appreciable CSR activities. 5. Applications Received against call for entries in May-June, 2017, shall be treated as “Deemed Nominations” for the current cycle of NCSRA. 5.1 From the Deemed Nominations of last year, shortlisted Companies shall be required to submit their details in the new submission format in due course. 5.2 However, such companies may seek nomination separately in the NCSRA-2018. 6. Overview of Award Methodology and Timelines to Nominate and Selection In order to achieve the stated objectives of the Awards, the methodology will include a three-stage process. Detailed methodology of selection for each award category has been placed at Annexure– III. Phase 1: Nomination Phase Designated Nominating Organisations as mentioned in para 2 will submit on the designated portal (www.csr.gov.in) a one-page summary containing details such as (a) Name of the company (b) Category of award in which nominated (c) CSR interventions along with associated aspects such as innovation, usage of technology, gender and environment issues, equity, replicability, scalability and sustainability of the CSR interventions (d) Impact of CSR intervention/s Page 4 of 27 (e) Details of how the nominating organization is involved in the CSR activities, if any, and (f) Reasons for nominations and recommendation of the nominating organization. A proforma for online submission of nominations has been prescribed at Annexure – IV. Phase 2: Preliminary scrutiny of all received nominations shall be carried out by a panel of independent CSR experts as per criteria decided by the Jury. Shortlisted entries shall be reviewed by the Jury. Subsequently, shortlisted entries shall be invited to submit full details online. Phase 3: Field verification of the shortlisted entries shall be carried by independent agencies as approved by the Jury/ Ministry. Page 5 of 27 Annexure - I Since companies are incurring and reporting CSR expenditure as per the enlisted items in Schedule VII of Companies Act 2013, most suitable alignment of Schedule VII with the National Priority Schemes is as below. A list of important schemes of Government of India is placed at Annexure – II. S.No. Award Category of National Priority Schemes National CSR Awards 1. Education 1. UDAN scheme 2. Midday Meal Scheme 2. Skill development & 1. Stand-up India: Access to credit for unemployed Livelihoods youth 2. Start-up India: Promotion of Start-ups through incubation 3. Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana 4. Skill India Mission 5. Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY)/ Promotion of less-cash measures 6. Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY) 7. Make in India 8. DeenDayal Upadhyaya Grameen Kaushalya Yojana (DDUGKY) 3. Agriculture and rural 1. Saansad Adarsh Gram Yojana development 2. DeenDayal Upadhyay Gram Jyoti Yojana 3. Pradhan Mantri FasalBima Yojana 4. Soil Health Card Scheme 5. Shyam Prasad Mukherjee Rurban Mission 6. Pradhan Mantri SurakshitSadak Yojana 4. Health, safe drinking 1. Ayushman Bharat water and sanitation 2. Swachh Bharat Abhiyan 3. Pradhan Mantri Jan Aushadhi Yojana (PMJAY) 4. Mission Bhagirathi- Providing safe drinking Water to All 5. Pradhan Mantri KhanijKshetra Kalyan Yojana 6. Pradhan Mantri SurakshitMatritva Abhiyan 7. Pradhan Mantri Matritva Vandana Yojana 5. Environment and 1. Promotion of solar light and LED bulbs sustainable development 2. NamamiGange including solar energy 3. Pradhan Mantri KhanijKshetra Kalyan Yojana 6. Women and Child Development 1. BetiBachaoBetiPadhao 2. Pradhan Mantri Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana (PMSSY) 7. Technology incubation 1. Start-up India: Promotion of Start-ups through incubation Page 6 of 27 S.No. Award Category of National Priority Schemes National CSR Awards 2. Digital India 8. Promotion of sports 1. Khelo India Programme 9. Slum area development 1. Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) 2. Smart City Mission 10. Heritage, art and culture 2. National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY) 11. Support to differently 1. Dindayal Rehabilitation Scheme abled Page 7 of 27 Annexure – II List of Important Schemes of Government of India 1. Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) 2. Pradhan Mantri Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana (PMSSY) 3. Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana (PMMY) 4. Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY) 5. Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (PMSBY) 6. Atal Pension Yojana (APY) 7. Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) 8. Sansad Adarsh Gram Yojana (SAGY) 9. Pradhan Mantri FasalBima Yojana (PMFBY) 10. Pradhan Mantri Gram Sinchai Yojana (PMGSY) 11. Pradhan Mantri SadakVikas Yojana (PMSVY) 12. Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Yojanaye (PMGKY) 13. Pradhan Mantri Jan Aushadhi Yojana (PMJAY) 14. Make in India 15. Swachh Bharat Abhiyan 16. KisanVikas Patra 17. Soil Health Card Scheme 18. Digital India 19. Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) 20. BetiBachao, BetiPadhao Yojana 21. Mission Indradhanush 22. DeenDayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana (DDUGJY) 23. DeenDayal Upadhyaya Grameen Kaushalya Yojana (DDUGKY) 24. Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay ShramevJayate Yojana (PDUSJY) 25. Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT) 26. Swadesh Darshan Yojana 27. PRASAD (Pilgrimage Rejuvenation and Spiritual Augmentation Drive) 28. National Heritage City Development and Augmentation Yojana (HRIDAY) 29. Udaan Scheme 30. National Bal Swachhta Mission 31. One Rank One Pension (OROP) Scheme 32. Smart City Mission Page 8 of 27 33. Gold Monetisation Schemes 34. Startup India, Standup India 35. DigiLocker 36. Integrated Power Development Scheme (IPDS) 37. Shyama Prasad Mukherji Rurban Mission 38. Sagarmala Project 39. ‘Prakash Path’ – ‘Way to Light’ – The National LED Programme 40. Pradhan Mantri Sahaj Bijli HarGhar Yojana 41. Vikalp Scheme 42. National Sports Talent Search Scheme (NSTSS) 43. Khelo India Scheme 44. Rashtriya Gokul Mission 45. PAHAL-Direct Benefits Transfer for LPG (DBTL) Consumers Scheme 46. Pradhan Mantri KhanijKshetra Kalyan Yojana (PMKKKY) 47. NamamiGange Project 48. SetuBharatam Project 49. Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana 50. Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan 51. Clean My Coach 52. Unnat Bharat Abhiyan 53. TB Mission 2020 54. Mukhya Mantri Shubh Lakshmi Yojana 55. National Apprenticeship Promotion Scheme 56. Gangajal
Recommended publications
  • Lok Sabha ___ Synopsis of Debates

    Lok Sabha ___ Synopsis of Debates

    LOK SABHA ___ SYNOPSIS OF DEBATES* (Proceedings other than Questions & Answers) ______ Tuesday, July 16, 2019 / Ashadha 25, 1941 (Saka) ______ *MATTERS UNDER RULE 377 (1) SHRI KAUSHAL KISHORE laid a statement regarding regularisation of services of 'Shiksha Mitra' in Uttar Pradesh. (2) SHRIMATI SANDHYA RAY laid a statement regarding development of facilities and beautification of 'Pitambara Devi' temple in Datiya, Madhya Pradesh. (3) SHRI PRADEEP KUMAR CHAUDHARY laid a statement regarding need to run long distance trains on Delhi-Shamli- Saharanpur railway route. (4) SHRI JAGDAMBIKA PAL laid a statement regarding grievances of Accredited Social Health Activists in Uttar Pradesh. * Hon. Members may kindly let us know immediately the choice of language (Hindi or English) for obtaining Synopsis of Lok Sabha Debates. * Laid on the Table as directed by the Speaker/Chair. (5) SHRI TIRATH SINGH RAWAT laid a statement regarding remedial measures for protection of crops damaged by wild animals in Uttarakhand. (6) SHRI KAPIL MORESHWAR PATIL laid a statement regarding widening of Rail under Bridge No. 98/2 in Bhiwandi parliamentary constituency, Maharashtra. (7) SHRI GOPAL SHETTY laid a statement regarding need to provide civic amenities in slum areas in Mumbai, Maharashtra. (8) SHRI SURESH PUJARI laid a statement regarding abnormal rise in cancer cases in Bargarh Parliamentary Constituency of Odisha. (9) SHRI RAJENDRA AGRAWAL laid a statement regarding need to facilitate availability of Kashmir Willow wood to Sports Industry of Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. (10) SHRI SUBHASH CHANDRA BAHERIA laid a statement regarding damages caused by mining activities in Bhilwara district of Rajasthan. (11) SHRI PASHUPATI NATH SINGH laid a statement regarding villages situated on vacant land of Bokaro Steel Plant, Jharkhand.
  • Position Paper on SC & ST Final 6 May 05

    Position Paper on SC & ST Final 6 May 05

    Position Paper National Focus Group on Problems of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Children Introduction This position paper critically examines the contemporary reality of schooling of children belonging to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities who have been historically excluded from formal education – the former due to their oppression under caste feudal society and the latter due to their spatial isolation and cultural difference and subsequent marginalisation by dominant society. There are thus sharp differences between these two categories of population in terms of socio-economic location and the nature of disabilities. However, there is also growing common ground today in terms of conditions of economic exploitation and social discrimination that arise out of the impact of iniquitous development process. Concomitantly, the categories themselves are far from homogenous in terms of class, region, religion and gender and what we face today is an intricately complex reality. Bearing this in mind this paper attempts to provide a contextualised understanding of the field situation of the education of SC/ST children and issues and problems that directly or indirectly have a bearing on their future educational prospects. The paper seeks to provide a background to the National Curriculum Framework Review being undertaken by the National Council of Educational Research and Training. As such, it looks critically and contextually at educational developments among the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe with a view to arrive at an understanding of what policy and programmatic applications can be made, especially in the domain of curriculum, to improve their situation. The problems are many and complex. The paper attempts but does not claim a comprehensive discussion of the varied nuances of their complexity.
  • Nutrition Situation and Stakeholder Mapping

    Nutrition Situation and Stakeholder Mapping

    This report compiles secondary data on the nutrition situation and from a stakeholder mapping in Pune, India to inform the new partnership between Birmingham, UK and Pune on Smart Nutrition Pune Nutrition situation and Courtney Scott, The Food Foundation) stakeholder mapping 2018 Table of Contents About BINDI ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nutrition Situational Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 3 Malnutrition in all its forms ............................................................................................................................ 3 Causes of malnutrition in Pune ..................................................................................................................... 6 Current Public Health / Food Interventions ...................................................................................................
  • Output Outcome Framework for Schemes 2018-2019 Demand No

    Output Outcome Framework for Schemes 2018-2019 Demand No

    PREFACE Major Expenditure Reforms have been undertaken by the Government over the last two-three years. This not only includes simplification of appraisal and approval processes, but also structural changes in the process of budget making itself like doing away with Plan Non-plan distinction. As a result,the cost-centres are being treated in an integrated manner, within only the statutory revenue capital framework. This enables another major structural reform, which is to bring the public schemes and projects under a monitorable Output-Outcome framework. Since 2017-18, in addition to the financial outlays of schemes of the Ministries being indicated in the Budget document, the expected outputs and outcomes of the schemes were also prepared and presented separately by each Ministry in the form of Outcome Budget. T h e s e Outlays, Outputs and Outcomes are being presented to the Parliament in measurable terms, bringing-in greater accountability for the agencies involved in the execution of government schemes and projects. utlay is the amount that is provided for a given scheme or project in the Budget; while Outpu refers to the direct and measurable product of program activities, often expressed in physical terms or units. utcome are the collective results or qualitative improvements brought about in the delivery of these services, often expressed in terms of improvements over ex-ante or earlier indicators and benchmarks. From the last year s budget, it was decided that the output and outcomes of the schemes of 68 Ministries and Departments would be available along with the financial outlays as a part of the Budget documents, so that clearly defined objectives and goals for each scheme can be seen by all.
  • Impact of Soil Health Card Scheme on Production, Productivity and Soil Health in Assam

    Impact of Soil Health Card Scheme on Production, Productivity and Soil Health in Assam

    Study No-148 IMPACT OF SOIL HEALTH CARD SCHEME ON PRODUCTION, PRODUCTIVITY AND SOIL HEALTH IN ASSAM Study Sponsored by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Government of India, New Delhi Dr. Jotin Bordoloi Dr. Anup Kumar Das Agro-Economic Research Centre for North-East India Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat-785013 2017 Study No: 148 IMPACT OF SOIL HEALTH CARD SCHEME ON PRODUCTION, PRODUCTIVITY AND SOIL HEALTH IN ASSAM Dr. Jotin Bordoloi & Dr. Anup K. Das Study Sponsored by- Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi Coordinating Centre Agricultural Development and Rural Transformation Centre (ADRTC) Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Bengaluru Agro-Economic Research Centre for North-East India Assam Agricultural University Jorhat - 785 013, Assam 2017 Study Team Project in-charge & Report writing Dr. Jotin Bordoloi Dr. A.K. Das Field Investigation & Data Collection Dr. Jotin Bordoloi Sri Debajit Borah Sri Madhurjya Bora Tabulation Dr. Jotin Bordoloi Sri Debajit Borah Sri Madhurjya Bora Preface Healthy Soils can provide healthy crops. Soils naturally contain many nutrients, out of which nitrogen, phosphorous, calcium and potassium are of prime importance. These nutrients are essential for plants’ growth and development. When soil nutrients are missing or in short supply, plants suffer from nutrient deficiency and stop growing. Then, application of fertilizers to soils as per requirement is very important to provide balanced nutrients to the plants grown on it. The soils of Assam are basically acidic in nature. The productivity potential of soil is also limited. Together with cultivation of crops for years, the soils need to be replenished periodically.
  • Mid Day Meal Scheme in Himachal Pradesh

    Mid Day Meal Scheme in Himachal Pradesh

    Mid Day Meal Scheme in Himachal Pradesh Economics 8t Statistics Department Himachal Prabesh Evaluation of Mid Day Meal Scheme in Himachal Pradesh Economics & Statistics Department Himachal Pradesh prtucalional Plann/, documentation Ce^ Pradeep Chauhan Economic Adviser Government of Himachal Pradesh PREFACE Indian education system is suffering enrolment, dropout and retention at primary and secondary level. In view of this issue, the Government of India has launched the scheme titled as Mid-Day Meal through which the benefits were targeted to the vulnerable section of the society i.e. the future of the country. This programme has also been introduced in the State in the same perspective. Since there is no data from the studies on the technical, operational and administrative feasibility of MDM implementation in the state, it was considered imperative to carry out mid-term evaluation as per guideline of Government of Himachal to determine the effectiveness, outcome and impact of the scheme. The evaluation study was conducted in six selected district Chamba, Kullu, L & S, Mandi and Sirmaur. The Present report is based on the data collected, analyzed from sample of 334 MDM centres which comprised in 33 Blocks of State. The Mid Day Meal scheme in HP is monitored by the Department of Education and this evaluation study was carried out by Department of Economics and Statistics. The main findings of the survey are present in Executive Summary of the report. The department acknowledges, with gratitude the unstinted co­ operation received from the students, local people and teachers and thanks to the authorities of education department, but for whose co­ operation, the survey would not have been possible.
  • REPORT of CENTRE for DEVELOPMENT STUDIES on MID DAY MEALS in SCHOOLS DURING the PERIOD of 1St October, 2014 to 31St March, 2015

    REPORT of CENTRE for DEVELOPMENT STUDIES on MID DAY MEALS in SCHOOLS DURING the PERIOD of 1St October, 2014 to 31St March, 2015

    THIRD HALF YEARLY MONITORING REPORT OF CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT STUDIES ON MID DAY MEALS IN SCHOOLS DURING THE PERIOD OF 1st October, 2014 to 31st March, 2015 Districts Monitored/Covered 1. Kannur 2. Idukki 3. Palakkad 4. Wayanad 5. Kozhicode Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 1 INDEX Sl.No. Particulars/Details Page No. 1. Forward 3 2. Acknowledgement 4 3. General Information 5 4 Detailed Report on Kannur District 7 5. Detailed Report on Idukki District 25 6. Detailed Report on Palakkad District 41 7. Detailed Report on Wayanad District 58 8. Detailed Report on Kozhicode District 75 2 FOREWORD Centre for Development Studies, the Monitoring Institute in charge of monitoring all districts (fourteen) in Kerala state feels privileged to be one of the Monitoring Institutions across the country for broad based monitoring of SSA, RTE and MDM activities. This is the third half yearly report on Mid Day Meals (MDM) for the year 2013-15 and is based on the data collected from five districts in Kerala, viz., Kannur, Idukki, Palakkad, Wayanad and Kozhicode. I hope the findings of the report would be helpful to both the Government of India and the Government of Kerala state to understand the functioning of and the achievements with regard to Mid Day Meals (MDM) in the state. The problems identified at the grass root level may be useful for initiating further interventions in the implementation of Mid Day Meals (MDM) in the state. In this context I extend my hearty thanks to C. Gasper, Nodal Officer for monitoring Mid Day Meals (MDM) in Kerala and his team members who have rendered a good service by taking pains to visit the schools located in the most inaccessible areas and preparing the report in time.
  • Redesigning India's Urea Policy

    Redesigning India's Urea Policy

    Redesigning India’s urea policy Sid Ravinutala MPA/ID Candidate 2016 in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Public Administration in International Development, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Advisor: Martin Rotemberg Section Leader: Michael Walton ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Arvind Subramanian, Chief Economic Adviser, Government of India for the opportunity to work on this issue as part of his team. Credit for the demand-side solution presented at the end goes to Nandan Nilekani, who casually dropped it while in a car ride, and of course to Arvind for encouraging me to pursue it. Credit for the supply-side solution goes to Arvind, who from the start believed that decanalization throttles efficiency in the market. He has motivated a lot of the analysis presented here. I would also like to thank the rest of the members of ‘team CEA’. We worked on fertilizer policy together and they helped me better understand the issues, the people, and the data. The analyses of domestic firms and the size and regressivity of the black market were done by other members of the team (Sutirtha, Shoumitro, and Kapil) and all credit goes to them. Finally, I want to thank my wife, Mara Horwitz, and friend and colleague Siddharth George for reviewing various parts and providing edits and critical feedback. Finally, I would like to thank Michael Walton and Martin Rotemberg for providing insightful feedback and guidance as I narrowed my policy questions and weighed possible solutions. I also had the opportunity to contribute to the chapter on fertilizer policy in India’s 2016 Economic Survey.
  • 2020121470.Pdf

    2020121470.Pdf

    INDEX 1. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare ................................................... 1 to 12 2. Ministry of Commerce and Industry .................................................................... 13 to 16 3. Ministry of communication ................................................................................... 17 to 18 4. Ministry of Finance ................................................................................................. 19 to 24 5. Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises ...................................................... 25 6. Ministry of Human Resource and Development ................................................... 26 to 32 7. Ministry of Jal Shakti. ............................................................................................ 33 to 36 8. Ministry of Minority Affairs .................................................................................. 37 to 39 9. Minority of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions .............................................. 40 10. Ministry of Panchayat Raj .............................................................................................. 41 11. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways: .................................................................. 42 12. Ministry of Rural Development ............................................................................ 43 to 47 13. Ministry of Shipping ....................................................................................................... 48 14. Ministry
  • Impact Study of Soil Health Card Scheme, National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Hyderabad-500030, Pp.210

    Impact Study of Soil Health Card Scheme, National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Hyderabad-500030, Pp.210

    Citation: Reddy A Amarender (2017) Impact Study of Soil Health Card Scheme, National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Hyderabad-500030, Pp.210. i ii Acknowledgement The study on “Impact of Soil Health Card Scheme” has been carried out at the National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, as suggested and sponsored by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. We have benefited immensely from various scholars and officials from different government departments while carrying out this study. At the outset, we would like to thank Smt. V Usha Rani, IAS, Director General of our institute as well as Smt. Rani Kumudhini, IAS then Joint Secretary, INM, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India for their constant encouragement and support for undertaking this impact study. We are grateful to Smt. Neerja, IAS, Joint Secretary, INM, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India and Dr. Chaudhary, Additional Commissioner, INM, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation and Farmers Welfare for continuous support and guidance. We are grateful to directors and joint directors and other officials from different state department of agriculture for their cooperation during the field survey and later interactions in focus group interactions for sharing their valuable suggestions. We thank Dr. Ratna Reddy, Dr. Padma Raju, ex Vice Chancellor, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Dr. CP Chandrashekar, former dean, PJTSAU for their guidance and active involvement. We thank our colleagues in MANAGE for their support and encouragement while carrying out the study. Especially we thank Dr.VP Sharma, Dr.Renuka Rani, Waheeda for their continuous support.
  • Csap-At-15-03-2021

    Csap-At-15-03-2021

    THE ASSAM TRIBUNE ANALYSIS DATE – 15 MARCH 2021 For Preliminary and Mains examination As per new Pattern of APSC (Also useful for UPSC and other State level government examinations) Answers of MCQs of 13-03-2021 1. C 2. D. Shanghai, China 3. B. Johannesburg, South Africa 4. D. 2010 5. B. Amrita Pritam MCQs of 15-03-2021 Q1. India is a member of which among the following? 1. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation 2. Association of South-East Asian Nations 3. East Asia Summit Select the correct answer using the code given below. A. 1 and 2 only B. 3 only C. 1, 2 and 3 D. India is a member of none of them Q2. The term ‘Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership’ often appears in the news in the context of the affairs of a group of countries known as A. G20 B. ASEAN C. SCO D. SAARC Q3. India is a regular member of which of the following organizations? 1. BIMSTEC 2. Shanghai Cooperation Organization 3. ASEAN 4. G-20 Codes: A. 1 and 2 only B. 2 and 3 only C. 1 and 4 only D. All of these Q4. UDAN scheme launched in the year A. 2015 B. 2016 C. 2017 D. 2018 Q5. The proportion of tribal population to the total population of Assam is A. One third B. One fifth C. One – eighth D. One – tenth CONTENTS 1. Committed to free, secure and ‘prosperous Indo-Pacific region’ ( GS 2 – International Relations ) 2. Govt launches UDAN 4.1, invites bids for priority routes ( GS 3 – Schemes ) 3.
  • Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet | 1 2 | Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet TITLE Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet

    Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet | 1 2 | Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet TITLE Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet

    RUMBLE UNDER OUR FEET Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet | 1 2 | Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet TITLE Business of Sports – Rumble Under Our Feet YEAR November, 2018 Media & Entertainment, Fine Arts, Luxury and Sports Banking Group, YES BANK; French Trade AUTHORS Commission - Business France India No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form by photo, photoprint, microfilm or any COPYRIGHT other means without the written permission of YES BANK Ltd. & French Trade Commission - Business France India This report is the publication of YES BANK Limited (“YES BANK”) and so YES BANK has editorial control over the content, including opinions, advice, Statements, services, offers etc. that is represented in this report. However, YES BANK will not be liable for any loss or damage caused by the reader’s reliance on information obtained through this report. This report may contain third party contents and third-party resources. YES BANK takes no responsibility for third party content, advertisements or third party applications that are printed on or through this report, nor does it takes any responsibility for the goods or services provided by its advertisers or for any error, omission, deletion, defect, theft or destruction or unauthorized access to, or alteration of, any user communication. Further, YES BANK does not assume any responsibility or liability for any loss or damage, including personal injury or death, resulting from use of this report or from any content for communications or materials available on this report. The contents are provided for your reference only. The reader/ buyer understands that except for the information, products and services clearly identified as being supplied by YES BANK, it does not operate, control or endorse any information, products, or services appearing in the report in any way.