The Philosophical Age
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE PHILOSOPHICAL AGE THE NORTHERN LIGHTS SOCIAL PHILOSOPHIES AND UTOPIAS OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT IN NORTHERN EUROPE AND RUSSIA THE NORTHERN LIGHTS Social Philosophies and Utopias of the Enlightenment in Northern Europe and Russia Александровский институт университета Хельсинки Санкт-Петербургский центр истории идей ____________________________________________ ФИЛОСОФСКИЙ ВЕК АЛЬМАНАХ 39 СЕВЕРНОЕ СИЯНИЕ Социальная философия и утопии Просвещения в Северной Европе и России Ответственные редакторы Т.В. Артемьева, М.И. Микешин, В. Ойттинен Санкт-Петербургский центр истории идей Санкт-Петербург — Хельсинки 2013 The Aleksanteri Institute of the University of Helsinki St. Petersburg Center for the History of Ideas ____________________________________________ THE PHILOSOPHICAL AGE ALMANAC 39 THE NORTHERN LIGHTS Social Philosophies and Utopias of the Enlightenment in Northern Europe and Russia Edited by Tatiana Artemyeva, Mikhail Mikeshin, Vesa Oittinen St. Petersburg Center for the History of Ideas St. Petersburg — Helsinki 2013 Ответственные редакторы альманаха: Т.В. Артемьева, М.И. Микешин В оформлении использовано аллегорическое изображение философии из книги «Иконология, объясненная лицами, или полное собрание аллегорий, емблем и пр.» (Т. 2. М., 1803). В 39-м выпуске альманаха «Философский век» опубликованы мате- риалы международного научного симпозиума «Северное сияние: Соци- альная философия и утопия Просвещения в Северной Европе и России», проведенного 14–15 сентября 2012 г. в Александровском институте университета Хельсинки в сотрудничестве с Санкт-Петербургским цен- тром истории идей. Симпозиум продолжил серию семинаров «Северное сияние», являющуюся составной частью проекта «Centre of Excellence» Александровского института, исследующего модернизационные про- цессы в России. Семинары «Северное сияние» изучают историческую роль мысли эпохи Просвещения и ее влияние на создание современных обществ в Скандинавии и России. Философский век. Альманах. Выпуск 39. Северное сияние: Соци- альная философия и утопии Просвещения в Северной Европе и России / Отв. редакторы Т.В. Артемьева, М.И. Микешин, В. Ойтти- нен. — СПб. — Хельсинки: Санкт-Петербургский центр истории идей, 2013. — 168 с. ISBN 978-5-906078-82-7 The Philosophical Age. Almanac 39. The Northern Lights: Social Philoso- phies and Utopias of the Enlightenment in Northern Europe and Russia. Ed. by T. Artemyeva, M. Mikeshin, V. Oittinen. St. Petersburg — Helsinki: St. Petersburg Center for the History of Ideas, 2013. Компьютерный макет: М.И. Микешин Санкт-Петербургский центр истории идей http://ideashistory.org.ru © Авторы Альманах «Философский век», 2013 5 CONTENTS Vesa Oittinen Foreword: Enlightenment and Utopia 9 Tatiana Artemyeva Alternative History as Utopia 12 Mikhail Mikeshin The Vorontsov Brothers’ Utopia of the Aristocratic Senate 22 Oili Pulkkinen The Scottish Enlightenment and Utopian Political Thought: Genre and Context 36 Hartwig Frank Von der Klarheit zur Mündigkeit. Zu den Implikationen eines Metaphernwechsels in der Aufklärung 48 Larisa Nikiforova The Beehive Metaphor and the Amber Room in the Catherine Palace at Tsarskoye Selo 63 Pekka Hongisto On Thomas Thorild and Utopias 81 Vesa Oittinen The First Finnish Utopian? Gabriel Israel Hartman and His Poem to the Magisterial Promotion of 1805 102 Maria Rakhmaninova Zur Aktualität der Ideen der Aufklärung in Rußland und Deutschland am Beispiel von Kropotkins Kommunitarismus und Stirners Individualismus 123 Kimmo Sarje Anders Chydenius’s Rhetoric for the Freedom of Foreign Trade in Sweden in 1765 137 6 Contents Maren Jonasson The Works of Anders Chydenius: A Springboard for Comparative Research 154 List of Contributors 166 7 СОДЕРЖАНИЕ Веса Ойттинен Предисловие: Просвещение и утопия 9 Татьяна Артемьева Альтернативная история как утопия 12 Михаил Микешин Аристократический сенат — утопия братьев Воронцовых 22 Оили Пулккинен Шотландское Просвещение и утопическая политическая мысль: жанр и контекст 36 Хартвиг Франк От ясности к зрелости. О предпосылках изменения метафор в эпоху Просвещения 48 Лариса Никифорова Метафора пчелиного улья и Янтарная комната Екатерининского дворца в Царском Селе 63 Пекка Хонгисто О Томасе Торильде и утопиях 81 Веса Ойттинен Первый финский утопист? Габриель Израель Хартман и его поэма на получение титула магистра в 1805 г. 102 Мария Рахманинова Об актуальности идей Просвещения в России и Германии на примере коммунитарного анархизма Кропоткина и индивидуализма Штирнера 123 Киммо Сарье Аргументы Андерса Чудениуса за свободу международной торговли в Швеции в 1765 г. 137 8 Contents Марен Йонассон Сочинения Андерса Чудениуса: трамплин для компаративного исследования 154 Список авторов 166 9 Foreword ENLIGHTENMENT AND UTOPIA Vesa Oittinen Many historians of utopian thought do pass the Enlightenment age with a short mention, focusing instead on early utopias of Pla- to and Thomas More, or then on the socialist and communist ideas developed in the 19th and 20th centuries. One could, however, claim with good reason that the Enlightenment period, the 18th century, was the age of utopias par excellence. Not only utopias in the received sense were presented — that is, more or less fantastic descriptions of an ideal state of society or of “bright future,” — the whole Enlightenment project set off the seeking of alternatives to the order of ancien régime, and was in this sense “utopian.” The Enlightenment is commonly seen as the “Age of Reason” and thus the stress on its Utopian moment may sound contradicto- ry to this view. However, for the men living in the eighteenth cen- tury, rationalism and utopianism were not mutually exclusive modes of thought. On the contrary, it was just the Enlightenment rationalism which fostered utopian views and projects for an en- tirely new social order. The Philosophical Age. Almanac 39. The Northern Lights: Social Philosophies and Utopias of the Enlightenment in Northern Europe and Russia. St. Peters- burg — Helsinki: St. Petersburg Center for the History of Ideas, 2013. P. 9–11. 10 Foreword This question is worth a closer look. We can take as starting point the well-known definitions of Karl Mannheim in his now classical work Ideologie und Utopie (1929). He distinguishes four fundamental forms of utopia: (i) the chiliastic movements, as re- presented e.g. by the Anabaptists in the 16th century; (ii) the liber- al humanitarian idea; (iii) the conservative idea; (iv) the socialist- communist utopia. In this listing, the Enlightenment utopianism would mainly belong to the second category, although even some communist ideas were expressed, albeit in a very foggy manner. But why did utopias play such a prominent role in the social thought of the Enlightenment? It seems that the answer is rather simple: the Enlightenment thinkers aimed at a new, more rational and more just social order than the existing hierarchical society with its estate privileges was, but such a new society did not yet exist nowhere. The present-day liberal democratic social order, which we nowadays — at least in the West — take for granted, ex- isted in the 18th century only as blueprints in the works of the phi- losophes. The Enlightenment thinkers wanted a society which did not yet exist in the real world, and in this sense the core character- istics of utopian thought, which according to Mannheim consists in “ideas which transcend that which exists at the present,” is indeed applicable to most of the social projects of the epoch. To repeat, this utopianism did not contradict the rationalism and criticism inherent to the spirit of the 18th century, on the contrary. One should not forget, that in the previous century, in the 1600s, the natural sciences were yet a similar utopian project. Men of ear- ly modern science, like Descartes and Galilei, were only beginning to apply the new methodological ideas on the research of natural phenomena and fell often into utopian visions — the most spec- tacular example of these is the idea of a characteristica universalis by Leibniz, which, according to him, should henceforth settle all scientific disputes. Indeed, the example of Leibniz specifically Foreword 11 demonstrates, how a strict rationalism and utopianism are able to go hand in hand. * * * The Aleksanteri Institute of the University of Helsinki and the St. Petersburg Center for the History of Ideas organized in 14–15 September 2012 a symposium on social philosophies and utopias of the Enlightenment in Northern Europe and Russia. The sympo- sium, which had 14 speakers, was the second in a series of Russian and Finnish scholars discussing problems of the Enlightenment age. The previous symposium was held in 2009. The 2012 symposium was opened by Prof. Markku Kangaspu- ro, Director of the Research of the Aleksanteri Institute. While the papers by Tatiana Artemyeva, Hartwig Frank and Oili Pulkkinen dealt with more general problems of analyzing the Enlightenment thought in its relation to utopias, the other contributions focused on special case studies, and Maren Jonasson presented the project of collected works of the important Finnish enlightener Anders Chydenius. Both the 2012 symposium and the coming ones will at the same time contribute to Aleksanteri Institute’s Centre of Excel- lence research project on the modernization processes taking place in Russia. 12 ALTERNATIVE HISTORY AS UTOPIA Tatiana Artemyeva Le nez de Cléopâtre, s’il eût été plus court, toute la face de la terre aurait change Blaise Pascal The content of “utopia” is much older than the name coined by Thomas More. It appeared in the time of