DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Report MetaJava - A Platform for Adaptable Operating-System Mechanisms Michael Golm, Jürgen Kleinöder April 1997 TR-I4-97-10 Technical Report Computer Science Department Operating Systems — IMMD IV Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany Presented at the ECOOP 97 Workshop on Object-Orientation and Operating Systems, June 10, 1997, Jyväskylä, Finland MetaJava - A Platform for Adaptable Operating-System Mechanisms Michael Golm, Jürgen Kleinöder1 University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Dept. of Computer Science IV Martensstr. 1, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany {golm, kleinoeder}@informatik.uni-erlangen.de Abstract to languages and run-time systems have been implemented 1 to support some of these mechanisms. But this solution does Fine-grained adaptable operating-system services can not meet the very diverse demands, different applications not be implemented with todays layered operating-system make on such mechanisms. Instead it is desirable to provide architectures. Structuring a system in base level and meta an application with means to control the implementation of level opens the implementation of operating-system ser- its run-time mechanismans and to add own modifications or vices. Operating-system services are implemented as meta extensions if necessary. Reflection is a fundamental concept objects and can be replaced by other meta objects if the to get influence on properties and implementation of the application object requires this. execution environment of a computing system. Smith’s work on 3-LISP [Smi82] was the first that con- 1 Introduction sidered reflection as essential part of the programming model. Maes [Mae87] studied reflection in object oriented This paper describes the MetaJava system, an extended systems. According to Maes reflection is the capability of a Java interpreter that allows structural and behavioral reflec- computational system to “reason about and act upon itself” tion. and adjust itself to changing conditions. Metaprogramming MetaJava was built to achieve the following goals: separates functional from non-functional code. Functional • It must be possible to separate the functional, applica- code is concerned with computations about the applica- tion-specific concerns from non-functional concerns, tion’s domain (base level), non-functional code resides at such as persistence and replication. the meta level, supervising the execution of the functional • The architecture must be general, that means several code. To enable this supervision, some aspects of the base- problems, such as persistence, distribution, replication, level computation must be reified. Reification is the process synchronization must be solvable in it. of making something explicit that is normally not part of the The paper is structured as follows. We first introduce the language or programming model. The advantages of the concepts of reflection and metaprogramming in Section 2 separation in base level and meta level are outlined in and the computational model of MetaJava in Section 3. Sec- [KlG96]. tion 4 explains how object-oriented meta-level architectures As pointed out in [Fer89] there are two types of reflec- can be applied to the structuring of operating systems. Sec- tion: structural and behavioral reflection (in [Fer89] termed tion 5 shows the problems that had to be solved during the computational reflection). Structural reflection reifies struc- implementation of MetaJava. Section 6 discusses related tural aspects of a program, such as inheritance and data work and Section 7 concludes the paper and suggests future types. The Java Reflection API [Sun97]is an example of work. structural reflection. Behavioral reflection is concerned with the reification of computations and their behavior. The main 2 Reflection and Metaprogramming focus of MetaJava is to provide behavioral reflection capa- bilities. This is described in the next section. In the past, programs had to fulfill a task in a limited com- putational domain. As applications have become increas- 3 Computational model of MetaJava ingly complex today, they need more capable programming models that support run-time mechanisms, such as multi- Traditional systems consist of an operating system and, on threading (synchronization, dead lock detection, etc.), dis- top of it, a program which exploits the OS services using an tribution, fault tolerance, mobile objects, extended transac- application programmer interface (API). tion models, persistence, and so on. Many ad hoc extensions Our reflective approach is different. The system consists 1. This work is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft of the OS, the application program (the base system), and DFG Grant Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 182, Project B2. the meta system. The program may not be aware of the meta 1 A base object also can invoke a method of the meta meta system object directly. This is called explicit meta interaction and is M2 M used to control the meta level from the base level. 4 Not every object must have a meta object attached to it. M3 M1 Meta objects may be attached dynamically to base objects at run time. This is especially important if a distributed com- event putation is controlled at the meta level and arbitrary method reflection (reification) arguments need to be made reflective. As long as no meta base system objects are attached to an application, our meta architecture A does not cause any overhead. So applications only have to pay for the meta-system functionality where they really B C need it. Currently meta objects can be attached to references, The computations of objects A,B,C raise an event that transfers objects, and classes. If a meta object is attached to an object, control to the meta level. the semantics of the object is changed. Sometimes it is desirable only to change the semantics of one reference to Figure 1: Computational model of behavioral reflection the object — for example, when tracing accesses to the ref- system. The computation in the base system raises events (see Figure 1). These events are delivered to the meta sys- void attachObject (MetaObject meta, Object base) tem. The meta system evaluates the events and reacts in a Bind a meta object to a base object. specific manner. All events are handled synchronously. Object continueExecution (EventMethodCall event) Base-level computation is suspended while the meta object Continue the execution of a base-level method. This calls the processes the event. This gives the meta level complete con- non-reflective method. No event is generated, otherwise the trol over the activity in the base system. For instance, if the reflection would not terminate. meta object receives a enter-method event, the default Object doExecute (EventMethodCall event) behavior would be to execute the method. But the meta Execute a method. Contrary to the previous method, this one object could also synchronize the method execution with calls the method as if it were called by an ordinary base another method of the base object. Other alternatives would object. be to queue the method for delayed execution and return to Object createNewInstance (EventObjectCreation event) the caller immediately, or to execute the method on a differ- Create a new instance of a class. The class name is passed as ent host. What actually happens depends entirely on the String (as part of the event parameter). meta object used. The currently defined events are listed in void installBytecode (Object ref, String method, byte code[]) Figure 2. Installs code as new method bytecode. Together with addConstantPoolItem this method is used to generate a enter-method(object, method, arguments) stub method in the place of the original method. method is being called at object with arguments String retrieveObjectLayout (Object ref) load-class(classname) Returns the types of all fields of object ref. This method is class classname is being used for the first time and used together with getFieldObject, getFieldInt, must be loaded getFieldFloat, setFieldObject, etc., to access fields of arbi- trary objects. create-object(class) Object getField (Object ref, String fieldName) an instance of class is being created Returns the contents of field fieldName of object ref. Name acquire-object-lock (object) and type of all fields (object layout) can be retrieved with the lock of object is being acquired retrieveObjectLayout. release-object-lock(object) void setField (Object ref, String fieldName, Object obj) the lock of object is being released Sets the contents of field fieldName of object ref to object obj. read-field (object, field) the field of object is being read int addConstantPoolItem (Class c, CPItem i) Adds an item to the constant pool of class c. write-field (object,field, value) value is being written into the field of object Figure 3: Selected methods of the meta-level interface of the MetaJava virtual machine Figure 2: Events generated by base computation 2 erence, or when attaching a certain security policy to the ref- erence [Rie96]. Attaching a meta object to a class makes all instances of the class reflective. To fulfill its tasks the meta object has access to a set of MetaJava VM methods which can manipulate the internal state of the vir- tual machine. These methods are called the meta-level inter- 2 face (MLI) of the virtual machine . A list of the most impor- give memory to give CPU time to tant methods of the MLI is given in Figure 3. 4 Metaobjects for open operating-system Memory Mgr. Scheduler implementations Garbage Collector In a Java environment, most mechanisms and policies that are traditionally regarded as operating-system or run-time– give CPU time to system services, are provided either by the virtual machine itself or by native libraries. As these services are imple- mented in C and the flexibility and comfort of a Java envi- ronment is not available for them, it is not easy to adapt Scheduler1 Scheduler2 them to special application needs or to transparently add RMI-handler1 RMI-handler2 new services. MetaJava provides an architecture for an open implementation of most mechanisms and policies that are method- execute thread in invocation currently a fixed part of the virtual machine, such as mem- event App.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metaobject Protocols: Why We Want Them and What Else They Can Do
    Metaobject protocols: Why we want them and what else they can do Gregor Kiczales, J.Michael Ashley, Luis Rodriguez, Amin Vahdat, and Daniel G. Bobrow Published in A. Paepcke, editor, Object-Oriented Programming: The CLOS Perspective, pages 101 ¾ 118. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993. © Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. Metaob ject Proto cols WhyWeWant Them and What Else They Can Do App ears in Object OrientedProgramming: The CLOS Perspective c Copyright 1993 MIT Press Gregor Kiczales, J. Michael Ashley, Luis Ro driguez, Amin Vahdat and Daniel G. Bobrow Original ly conceivedasaneat idea that could help solve problems in the design and implementation of CLOS, the metaobject protocol framework now appears to have applicability to a wide range of problems that come up in high-level languages. This chapter sketches this wider potential, by drawing an analogy to ordinary language design, by presenting some early design principles, and by presenting an overview of three new metaobject protcols we have designed that, respectively, control the semantics of Scheme, the compilation of Scheme, and the static paral lelization of Scheme programs. Intro duction The CLOS Metaob ject Proto col MOP was motivated by the tension b etween, what at the time, seemed liketwo con icting desires. The rst was to have a relatively small but p owerful language for doing ob ject-oriented programming in Lisp. The second was to satisfy what seemed to b e a large numb er of user demands, including: compatibility with previous languages, p erformance compara- ble to or b etter than previous implementations and extensibility to allow further exp erimentation with ob ject-oriented concepts see Chapter 2 for examples of directions in which ob ject-oriented techniques might b e pushed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bit Nove Signal Interface Processor
    www.audison.eu bit Nove Signal Interface Processor POWER SUPPLY CONNECTION Voltage 10.8 ÷ 15 VDC From / To Personal Computer 1 x Micro USB Operating power supply voltage 7.5 ÷ 14.4 VDC To Audison DRC AB / DRC MP 1 x AC Link Idling current 0.53 A Optical 2 sel Optical In 2 wire control +12 V enable Switched off without DRC 1 mA Mem D sel Memory D wire control GND enable Switched off with DRC 4.5 mA CROSSOVER Remote IN voltage 4 ÷ 15 VDC (1mA) Filter type Full / Hi pass / Low Pass / Band Pass Remote OUT voltage 10 ÷ 15 VDC (130 mA) Linkwitz @ 12/24 dB - Butterworth @ Filter mode and slope ART (Automatic Remote Turn ON) 2 ÷ 7 VDC 6/12/18/24 dB Crossover Frequency 68 steps @ 20 ÷ 20k Hz SIGNAL STAGE Phase control 0° / 180° Distortion - THD @ 1 kHz, 1 VRMS Output 0.005% EQUALIZER (20 ÷ 20K Hz) Bandwidth @ -3 dB 10 Hz ÷ 22 kHz S/N ratio @ A weighted Analog Input Equalizer Automatic De-Equalization N.9 Parametrics Equalizers: ±12 dB;10 pole; Master Input 102 dBA Output Equalizer 20 ÷ 20k Hz AUX Input 101.5 dBA OPTICAL IN1 / IN2 Inputs 110 dBA TIME ALIGNMENT Channel Separation @ 1 kHz 85 dBA Distance 0 ÷ 510 cm / 0 ÷ 200.8 inches Input sensitivity Pre Master 1.2 ÷ 8 VRMS Delay 0 ÷ 15 ms Input sensitivity Speaker Master 3 ÷ 20 VRMS Step 0,08 ms; 2,8 cm / 1.1 inch Input sensitivity AUX Master 0.3 ÷ 5 VRMS Fine SET 0,02 ms; 0,7 cm / 0.27 inch Input impedance Pre In / Speaker In / AUX 15 kΩ / 12 Ω / 15 kΩ GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Max Output Level (RMS) @ 0.1% THD 4 V PC connections USB 1.1 / 2.0 / 3.0 Compatible Microsoft Windows (32/64 bit): Vista, INPUT STAGE Software/PC requirements Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 10 Low level (Pre) Ch1 ÷ Ch6; AUX L/R Video Resolution with screen resize min.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Lisp Object System Specification 3. Metaobject Protocol
    Common Lisp Object System Specification 3. Metaobject Protocol This document was written by Daniel G. Bobrow, Linda G. DeMichiel, Richard P. Gabriel, Sonya E. Keene, Gregor Kiczales, and David A. Moon. Contributors to this document include Patrick Dussud, Kenneth Kahn, Jim Kempf, Larry Masinter, Mark Stefik, Daniel L. Weinreb, and Jon L White. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................... ............ 3–2 Status of Document ................................................... ........... 3–5 Terminology ................................................... ................ 3–6 Introduction ................................................... ................ 3–7 Class Organization in the CLOS Kernel ............................................... 3–9 The Classes in the CLOS Kernel ................................................... 3–10 standard-class ................................................... ............ 3–11 forward-referenced-class ................................................... ..... 3–11 built-in-class ................................................... ............. 3–11 structure-class ................................................... ............ 3–12 funcallable-standard-class ................................................... .... 3–12 standard-slot-description ................................................... .... 3–12 standard-class-slot-description ................................................... 3–12 standard-method ................................................... .......... 3–12
    [Show full text]
  • Signedness-Agnostic Program Analysis: Precise Integer Bounds for Low-Level Code
    Signedness-Agnostic Program Analysis: Precise Integer Bounds for Low-Level Code Jorge A. Navas, Peter Schachte, Harald Søndergaard, and Peter J. Stuckey Department of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia Abstract. Many compilers target common back-ends, thereby avoid- ing the need to implement the same analyses for many different source languages. This has led to interest in static analysis of LLVM code. In LLVM (and similar languages) most signedness information associated with variables has been compiled away. Current analyses of LLVM code tend to assume that either all values are signed or all are unsigned (except where the code specifies the signedness). We show how program analysis can simultaneously consider each bit-string to be both signed and un- signed, thus improving precision, and we implement the idea for the spe- cific case of integer bounds analysis. Experimental evaluation shows that this provides higher precision at little extra cost. Our approach turns out to be beneficial even when all signedness information is available, such as when analysing C or Java code. 1 Introduction The “Low Level Virtual Machine” LLVM is rapidly gaining popularity as a target for compilers for a range of programming languages. As a result, the literature on static analysis of LLVM code is growing (for example, see [2, 7, 9, 11, 12]). LLVM IR (Intermediate Representation) carefully specifies the bit- width of all integer values, but in most cases does not specify whether values are signed or unsigned. This is because, for most operations, two’s complement arithmetic (treating the inputs as signed numbers) produces the same bit-vectors as unsigned arithmetic.
    [Show full text]
  • Metaclasses: Generative C++
    Metaclasses: Generative C++ Document Number: P0707 R3 Date: 2018-02-11 Reply-to: Herb Sutter ([email protected]) Audience: SG7, EWG Contents 1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................2 2 Language: Metaclasses .......................................................................................................................................7 3 Library: Example metaclasses .......................................................................................................................... 18 4 Applying metaclasses: Qt moc and C++/WinRT .............................................................................................. 35 5 Alternatives for sourcedefinition transform syntax .................................................................................... 41 6 Alternatives for applying the transform .......................................................................................................... 43 7 FAQs ................................................................................................................................................................. 46 8 Revision history ............................................................................................................................................... 51 Major changes in R3: Switched to function-style declaration syntax per SG7 direction in Albuquerque (old: $class M new: constexpr void M(meta::type target,
    [Show full text]
  • Meta-Class Features for Large-Scale Object Categorization on a Budget
    Meta-Class Features for Large-Scale Object Categorization on a Budget Alessandro Bergamo Lorenzo Torresani Dartmouth College Hanover, NH, U.S.A. faleb, [email protected] Abstract cation accuracy over a predefined set of classes, and without consideration of the computational costs of the recognition. In this paper we introduce a novel image descriptor en- We believe that these two assumptions do not meet the abling accurate object categorization even with linear mod- requirements of modern applications of large-scale object els. Akin to the popular attribute descriptors, our feature categorization. For example, test-recognition efficiency is a vector comprises the outputs of a set of classifiers evaluated fundamental requirement to be able to scale object classi- on the image. However, unlike traditional attributes which fication to Web photo repositories, such as Flickr, which represent hand-selected object classes and predefined vi- are growing at rates of several millions new photos per sual properties, our features are learned automatically and day. Furthermore, while a fixed set of object classifiers can correspond to “abstract” categories, which we name meta- be used to annotate pictures with a set of predefined tags, classes. Each meta-class is a super-category obtained by the interactive nature of searching and browsing large im- grouping a set of object classes such that, collectively, they age collections calls for the ability to allow users to define are easy to distinguish from other sets of categories. By us- their own personal query categories to be recognized and ing “learnability” of the meta-classes as criterion for fea- retrieved from the database, ideally in real-time.
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing the Eulisp Metaobject Protocol
    Balancing the EuLisp Metaob ject Proto col x y x z Harry Bretthauer and Harley Davis and Jurgen Kopp and Keith Playford x German National Research Center for Computer Science GMD PO Box W Sankt Augustin FRG y ILOG SA avenue Gallieni Gentilly France z Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Bath Bath BA AY UK techniques which can b e used to solve them Op en questions Abstract and unsolved problems are presented to direct future work The challenge for the metaob ject proto col designer is to bal One of the main problems is to nd a b etter balance ance the conicting demands of eciency simplicity and b etween expressiveness and ease of use on the one hand extensibili ty It is imp ossible to know all desired extensions and eciency on the other in advance some of them will require greater functionality Since the authors of this pap er and other memb ers while others require greater eciency In addition the pro of the EuLisp committee have b een engaged in the design to col itself must b e suciently simple that it can b e fully and implementation of an ob ject system with a metaob ject do cumented and understo o d by those who need to use it proto col for EuLisp Padget and Nuyens intended This pap er presents a metaob ject proto col for EuLisp to correct some of the p erceived aws in CLOS to sim which provides expressiveness by a multileveled proto col plify it without losing any of its p ower and to provide the and achieves eciency by static semantics for predened means to more easily implement it eciently The current metaob
    [Show full text]
  • Bit, Byte, and Binary
    Bit, Byte, and Binary Number of Number of values 2 raised to the power Number of bytes Unit bits 1 2 1 Bit 0 / 1 2 4 2 3 8 3 4 16 4 Nibble Hexadecimal unit 5 32 5 6 64 6 7 128 7 8 256 8 1 Byte One character 9 512 9 10 1024 10 16 65,536 16 2 Number of bytes 2 raised to the power Unit 1 Byte One character 1024 10 KiloByte (Kb) Small text 1,048,576 20 MegaByte (Mb) A book 1,073,741,824 30 GigaByte (Gb) An large encyclopedia 1,099,511,627,776 40 TeraByte bit: Short for binary digit, the smallest unit of information on a machine. John Tukey, a leading statistician and adviser to five presidents first used the term in 1946. A single bit can hold only one of two values: 0 or 1. More meaningful information is obtained by combining consecutive bits into larger units. For example, a byte is composed of 8 consecutive bits. Computers are sometimes classified by the number of bits they can process at one time or by the number of bits they use to represent addresses. These two values are not always the same, which leads to confusion. For example, classifying a computer as a 32-bit machine might mean that its data registers are 32 bits wide or that it uses 32 bits to identify each address in memory. Whereas larger registers make a computer faster, using more bits for addresses enables a machine to support larger programs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Metaobject Protocol for Fault-Tolerant CORBA Applications
    A Metaobject Protocol for Fault-Tolerant CORBA Applications Marc-Olivier Killijian*, Jean-Charles Fabre*, Juan-Carlos Ruiz-Garcia*, Shigeru Chiba** *LAAS-CNRS, 7 Avenue du Colonel Roche **Institute of Information Science and 31077 Toulouse cedex, France Electronics, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8573, Japan Abstract The corner stone of a fault-tolerant reflective The use of metalevel architectures for the architecture is the MOP. We thus propose a special implementation of fault-tolerant systems is today very purpose MOP to address the problems of general-purpose appealing. Nevertheless, all such fault-tolerant systems ones. We show that compile-time reflection is a good have used a general-purpose metaobject protocol (MOP) approach for developing a specialized runtime MOP. or are based on restricted reflective features of some The definition and the implementation of an object-oriented language. According to our past appropriate runtime metaobject protocol for implementing experience, we define in this paper a suitable metaobject fault tolerance into CORBA applications is the main protocol, called FT-MOP for building fault-tolerant contribution of the work reported in this paper. This systems. We explain how to realize a specialized runtime MOP, called FT-MOP (Fault Tolerance - MetaObject MOP using compile-time reflection. This MOP is CORBA Protocol), is sufficiently general to be used for other aims compliant: it enables the execution and the state evolution (mobility, adaptability, migration, security). FT-MOP of CORBA objects to be controlled and enables the fault provides a mean to attach dynamically fault tolerance tolerance metalevel to be developed as CORBA software. strategies to CORBA objects as CORBA metaobjects, enabling thus these strategies to be implemented as 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Floating Point Arithmetic
    Systems Architecture Lecture 14: Floating Point Arithmetic Jeremy R. Johnson Anatole D. Ruslanov William M. Mongan Some or all figures from Computer Organization and Design: The Hardware/Software Approach, Third Edition, by David Patterson and John Hennessy, are copyrighted material (COPYRIGHT 2004 MORGAN KAUFMANN PUBLISHERS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED). Lec 14 Systems Architecture 1 Introduction • Objective: To provide hardware support for floating point arithmetic. To understand how to represent floating point numbers in the computer and how to perform arithmetic with them. Also to learn how to use floating point arithmetic in MIPS. • Approximate arithmetic – Finite Range – Limited Precision • Topics – IEEE format for single and double precision floating point numbers – Floating point addition and multiplication – Support for floating point computation in MIPS Lec 14 Systems Architecture 2 Distribution of Floating Point Numbers e = -1 e = 0 e = 1 • 3 bit mantissa 1.00 X 2^(-1) = 1/2 1.00 X 2^0 = 1 1.00 X 2^1 = 2 1.01 X 2^(-1) = 5/8 1.01 X 2^0 = 5/4 1.01 X 2^1 = 5/2 • exponent {-1,0,1} 1.10 X 2^(-1) = 3/4 1.10 X 2^0 = 3/2 1.10 X 2^1= 3 1.11 X 2^(-1) = 7/8 1.11 X 2^0 = 7/4 1.11 X 2^1 = 7/2 0 1 2 3 Lec 14 Systems Architecture 3 Floating Point • An IEEE floating point representation consists of – A Sign Bit (no surprise) – An Exponent (“times 2 to the what?”) – Mantissa (“Significand”), which is assumed to be 1.xxxxx (thus, one bit of the mantissa is implied as 1) – This is called a normalized representation • So a mantissa = 0 really is interpreted to be 1.0, and a mantissa of all 1111 is interpreted to be 1.1111 • Special cases are used to represent denormalized mantissas (true mantissa = 0), NaN, etc., as will be discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • OMG Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification
    Date : October 2019 OMG Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification Version 2.5.1 OMG Document Number: formal/2019-10-01 Standard document URL: https://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.5.1 Normative Machine-Readable Files: https://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/20131001/MOF.xmi Informative Machine-Readable Files: https://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/20131001/CMOFConstraints.ocl https://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/20131001/EMOFConstraints.ocl Copyright © 2003, Adaptive Copyright © 2003, Ceira Technologies, Inc. Copyright © 2003, Compuware Corporation Copyright © 2003, Data Access Technologies, Inc. Copyright © 2003, DSTC Copyright © 2003, Gentleware Copyright © 2003, Hewlett-Packard Copyright © 2003, International Business Machines Copyright © 2003, IONA Copyright © 2003, MetaMatrix Copyright © 2015, Object Management Group Copyright © 2003, Softeam Copyright © 2003, SUN Copyright © 2003, Telelogic AB Copyright © 2003, Unisys USE OF SPECIFICATION - TERMS, CONDITIONS & NOTICES The material in this document details an Object Management Group specification in accordance with the terms, conditions and notices set forth below. This document does not represent a commitment to implement any portion of this specification in any company's products. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. LICENSES The companies listed above have granted to the Object Management Group, Inc. (OMG) a nonexclusive, royalty-free, paid up, worldwide license to copy and distribute this document and to modify this document and distribute copies of the modified version. Each of the copyright holders listed above has agreed that no person shall be deemed to have infringed the copyright in the included material of any such copyright holder by reason of having used the specification set forth herein or having conformed any computer software to the specification.
    [Show full text]
  • Handwritten Digit Classication Using 8-Bit Floating Point Based Convolutional Neural Networks
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Apr 10, 2018 Handwritten Digit Classication using 8-bit Floating Point based Convolutional Neural Networks Gallus, Michal; Nannarelli, Alberto Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Gallus, M., & Nannarelli, A. (2018). Handwritten Digit Classication using 8-bit Floating Point based Convolutional Neural Networks. DTU Compute. (DTU Compute Technical Report-2018, Vol. 01). General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Handwritten Digit Classification using 8-bit Floating Point based Convolutional Neural Networks Michal Gallus and Alberto Nannarelli (supervisor) Danmarks Tekniske Universitet Lyngby, Denmark [email protected] Abstract—Training of deep neural networks is often con- In order to address this problem, this paper proposes usage strained by the available memory and computational power. of 8-bit floating point instead of single precision floating point This often causes it to run for weeks even when the underlying which allows to save 75% space for all trainable parameters, platform is employed with multiple GPUs.
    [Show full text]