Jephthah and the Ephraimites: Lessons We Can Take from the Fellowcraft Dialogue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jephthah and the Ephraimites: Lessons We Can Take from the Fellowcraft Dialogue Jephthah and the Ephraimites: Lessons we can take from the Fellowcraft dialogue By Bro. Christian Dubbs West Chester Lodge #322 A&FM of Pennsylvania Masonic ritual in certain jurisdictions defines freemasonry as a “peculiar system of morality, veiled in allegory, and illustrated by symbols” and we are constantly told that the goal of freemasonry is to make good men better. This morality however is not just limited to our symbols such as the working tools of a mason, the dialogue and lecture of the degrees are rife or filled with lessons that we can utilize to teach us how to make ourselves better and more moral men as well. Even small parts of the lectures or dialogues can have multiple moral lessons to teach us if they are examined thoroughly. One such example of this could be found the story of Jephthah and the Ephraimites. In the dialogue of the Fellow Cra Degree, we are told of Jephthah, judge of Israel, and the di iculties had with the Ephraimites. Because the Ephraimites were rebellious people, Jephthah had sought to subdue them and lessen their angers. Initially he used mild and lenient (non- violent) measures, but when they became angered over not being involved in the Ammonitish wars, stronger measures were taken. Due to their anger the Ephraimites crossed the Jordan River to lay waste to Jephthah’s lands, Jephthah and the men of Gilead were forced to fight and smote (kill) 42,000 Ephraimites and thus suppress this rebellion. As a part of this dialogue, we learn the fellow cra password and are gained admittance (entrance to a fellow cra lodge) and learn that due to this battle, our ancient brethren deemed it fitting. However, there are more lessons that can be taken from this dialogue. If you explore the history, the context, and the background of this area and the battle and uprising, the lessons embedded within can teach us how not only to be better masons, but also to be better men. To truly understand the lessons to be learned from this dialogue, the first question we must ask is, who were the Ephraimites? Ephraim was one of the twelve tribes of Israel. The tribe was named a er one of the younger sons of Joseph, who was himself as son of Jacob. In 930 BCE, the Tribe of Ephraim led the 10 northern tribes in a successful revolt or civil war against the south causing the Promised Land to split into the kingdoms of Israel in the North and Judah in the South. From the tribe of Ephraim came several Israelite leaders and Kings. Joshua, the man who led the conquest of Canaan and was the leader of the Israelites a er the death of Moses, was an Ephraimite. The first king of the united 10 tribes of Israel, Jeroboam the 1st, was an Ephraimite. As was the 7th king of Israel, Ahab, whose wife Jezebel attempted to lead the people of Israel into the worship of Baal, the sun god of the Phoenicians. In fact, the Ephraimites were so important in Israel that from 745 BCE until the land was conquered by the Assyrians in 721 BCE, the Kingdom of Israel was o en referred to as the Kingdom of Ephraim. How could such a prominent and important tribe in the land of Israel be led to such an uprising and revolt against Jephthah and the men of Gilead? In the dialogue of the Fellow Cra Degree, we learn that the Ephraimites became incensed or angered in not being included in the Ammonitish war and thus being allowed to share in its rich spoils. In the Bible, in the book of Judges, Chapter 10, we learn that the Ammonites had crossed the Jordan River to fight against the houses of Ephraim, Benjamin, and Judah. This was following their oppression and brutal domination of the people of Israel that were beyond the Jordan in the lands of Gilead for 18 years a er the passing of Ja’ir the Gileadite. The Ammonites were a Semitic people so like the Israelites they only believed in one God, and a er a long period of semi-nomadic (they were mostly a traveling people with no fixed cities or nation) existence, established a Kingdom North of Moab and East of Israel in the 13th century BCE. Rabbath Ammon was the principle city of the Ammonites. The Ammonites were in regular, although occasional and not constant, conflict with the Israelites. A er the passing of Ja’ir, the Israelites fell into the worship of the gods of their neighbors. Yahweh allowed the Ammonites and the Philistines to oppress the children of Israel for a span of one year until the children of Israel repented. Once the Israelites repented and turned away from the foreign gods, Yahweh once again had favor with them and became angry over the misery of Israel. The Ammonites were in conflict with Israel because they felt that Israel, upon their settlement of the Promised Land, had taken land that had belonged to the Ammonites. The Ammonites made an encampment in Gilead and the Israelites gathered in Mizpah to prepare for war. The Gileadites gathered to discuss who would lead them into battle and become head of all of Gilead. The answer was Jephthah the warrior. Before Jephthah was Judge over Israel, it was said that he was a mighty warrior. Jephthah had been cast out of the land of Gilead and into the land of Tob, and Gilead’s sons by his wife were the ones who had cast Jephthah out as Jephthah was the son of Gilead and a harlot (the Catholic and King James versions of the bible use the word harlot, the NIV version says prostitute either way Jephthah was born from an a air that was had by his father) and not the son of Gilead and his wife. While in the land of Tob, Jephthah collected many worthless fellows around him who accompanied him on raids. It can be assumed that from the experience of these raids that Jephthah learned the arts of war and became a mighty warrior. When the Gileadites called to Jephthah to lead their armies against the Ammonites, he was at first reluctant and distrustful of the Gileadites saying, “Did you not hate me, and drive me out of my father’s house? Why have you come to me now in trouble?” The elders of the Gileadites said they would make him the head of Gilead if he led their troops and gained victory over the Ammonites, a er which he accepted the charge. Jephthah made a pledge to Yahweh that if Yahweh delivered the Ammonites to his hand that whoever came forth from the doors of his house to meet him, he would sacrifice to Yahweh as a burnt o ering (Judges 11:32). Yahweh did deliver the Ammonites into Jephthah’s hands and he smote (killed) them and destroyed 20 of their cities. Upon returning home to Mizpah, his daughter who was his only child, came out to meet him. Jephthah explained to his daughter what he had promised to Yahweh. His daughter told him that he must keep his word. She only asked that she be allowed to go to the mountains and bewail (bemoan) that she would die a virgin. A er two months, his daughter returned to him and he kept his promise to Yahweh. He made a burnt o ering of his daughter. The Ephraimites were angry about not being called to participate in the Ammonitish war, as their lands were also attacked and besieged by the Ammonites just as those of Gilead had been. They felt they had just as much rite to participate in the war and to share in the spoils of the war. They crossed to Zaphon to threaten Jephthah and asked him, “Why did you cross over to fight against the Ammonites and not call us to go with you? We will burn your house over you with fire.” But Jephthah had called the Ephraimites to battle the Ammonites and they had not responded. When he saw that the Ephraimites were not coming to deliver him, he made his promise to Yahweh to gain victory over the Ammonites. It seems logical that he would blame the Ephraimites for the death of his daughter as it was only a er the Ephraimites had not come to his aide that he made his promise to God. He gathered all of the men of Gilead and fought the Ephraimites, both those that stood to fight and those that fled the fighting and became fugitives. Jephthah and the Gileadites killed 42,000 Ephraimites before the conflict came to an end. 42,000 Ephraimites. A mighty number of people lost. To put those numbers in context and perspective: 42,000 Canadian soldiers died in combat during all of World War II. In 1099 CE, 40,000 soldiers died in the siege of Jerusalem during the first crusade. The army of Egypt in the New Kingdom era (1539-1075 BCE) numbered 20,000 fighting soldiers (the total size of the army has been estimated at 100,000 mean, but most were forced non-fighting soldiers completing various public works projects similar to the Army corps of engineers). The Gileadites killed a number of people twice as large as what the Pharaoh could gather for a military campaign and the size of what was needed to sack and defend Jerusalem almost 2,000 years later. Jephthah was judge of Israel for six years, and Chabad.org has estimated that he was judge over Israel between 982-976 BCE (Chabad.org is the flagship website of the Chabad- Lubavitch Hasidic movement.
Recommended publications
  • The Good Samaritan Inn 55 NATIONAL PARKS and NATURE Mosaic Museum RESERVES
    BUY AN ISRAEL NATURE AND PARKS AUTHORITY SUBSCRIPTION FOR UNLIMITED FREE ENTRY TO The Good Samaritan Inn 55 NATIONAL PARKS AND NATURE Mosaic Museum RESERVES. A lioness from the Gaza mosaic Rules of Conduct ■ Do not harm the antiquities: Do not carve on them, walk on them or pour water on them. ■ Do not collect “souvenirs” from remains scattered in the area. ■ Do not enter places that are off-limits for visitors. Nearby Sites: ■ Do not cross fences or roll stones. ■ Please keep the area clean. Qumran Location of the Good Samaritan Inn Mosaic Museum National Park about 25 minutes’ drive The museum is on the southern side of the Jerusalem–Jericho road (road 1) between kilometer markers 80 and 81. The interchange affords easy access from whichever direction you approach. To reserve a guided tour for a group, email: You Enot Tsukim are here Nature Reserve [email protected] about 25 minutes’ drive Hours: Daily from 8:00 to 17:00. En Prat During winter time, the site closes one hour earlier. Nature Reserve On Fridays and holiday eves, the site closes one hour earlier. about 20 minutes’ drive Entry is permitted up to one hour before closing. Text: Ya‘acov Shkolnik Translation: Miriam Feinberg Vamosh 6.18 Photos: Israel Nature and Parks Authority Archive; Ya‘acov Shkolnik; Tal Romano; Amir Aloni Production: Adi Greenbaum www.parks.org.il I *3639 I © Israel Nature and Parks Authority The Good Samaritan Inn, Tel: 02-6338230 established on the initiative of the archaeologist Dr. Yitzhak Welcome to the Magen, who served as the head of the Judea and Samaria Inn of the Good Samaritan Archaeology Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Manasseh: Reflections on Tribe, Territory and Text
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Vanderbilt Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive MANASSEH: REFLECTIONS ON TRIBE, TERRITORY AND TEXT By Ellen Renee Lerner Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion August, 2014 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Douglas A. Knight Professor Jack M. Sasson Professor Annalisa Azzoni Professor Herbert Marbury Professor Tom D. Dillehay Copyright © 2014 by Ellen Renee Lerner All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people I would like to thank for their role in helping me complete this project. First and foremost I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee: Professor Douglas A. Knight, Professor Jack M. Sasson, Professor Annalisa Azzoni, Professor Herbert Marbury, and Professor Tom Dillehay. It has been a true privilege to work with them and I hope to one day emulate their erudition and the kind, generous manner in which they support their students. I would especially like to thank Douglas Knight for his mentorship, encouragement and humor throughout this dissertation and my time at Vanderbilt, and Annalisa Azzoni for her incredible, fabulous kindness and for being a sounding board for so many things. I have been lucky to have had a number of smart, thoughtful colleagues in Vanderbilt’s greater Graduate Dept. of Religion but I must give an extra special thanks to Linzie Treadway and Daniel Fisher -- two people whose friendship and wit means more to me than they know.
    [Show full text]
  • Numbers 36 Commentary
    Numbers 36 Commentary PREVIOUSNumbers: Journey to God's Rest-Land by Irving Jensen- used by permission NEXT Source: Ryrie Study Bible THE BOOK OF NUMBERS "Wilderness Wandering" WALKING WANDERING WAITING Numbers 1-12 Numbers 13-25 Numbers 26-36 Counting & Cleansing & Carping & 12 Spies & Aaron & Serpent of Second Last Days of Sections, Camping Congregation Complaining Death in Levites in Brass & Census 7 Moses as Sanctuaries & Nu 1-4 Nu 5-8 Nu 9-12 Desert Wilderness Story of Laws of Leader Settlements Nu 13-16 Nu 17-18 Balaam Israel Nu 31-33 Nu 34-36 Nu 21-25 Nu 26-30 Law Rebellion New Laws & Order & Disorder for the New Order Old Tragic New Generation Transition Generation Preparation for the Journey: Participation in the Journey: Prize at end of the Journey: Moving Out Moving On Moving In At Sinai To Moab At Moab Mt Sinai Mt Hor Mt Nebo En Route to Kadesh En Route to Nowhere En Route to Canaan (Mt Sinai) (Wilderness) (Plains of Moab) A Few Weeks to 38 years, A Few 2 Months 3 months, 10 days Months Christ in Numbers = Our "Lifted-up One" (Nu 21:9, cp Jn 3:14-15) Author: Moses Numbers 36:1 And the heads of the fathers' households of the family of the sons of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of the sons of Joseph, came near and spoke before Moses and before the leaders, the heads of the fathers' households of the sons of Israel, BGT Numbers 36:1 κα προσλθον ο ρχοντες φυλς υν Γαλααδ υο Μαχιρ υο Μανασση κ τς φυλς υν Ιωσηφ κα λλησαν ναντι Μωυσ κα ναντι Ελεαζαρ το ερως κα ναντι τν ρχντων οκων πατριν υν Ισραηλ NET Numbers 36:1 Then the heads of the family groups of the Gileadites, the descendant of Machir, the descendant of Manasseh, who were from the Josephite families, approached and spoke before Moses and the leaders who were the heads of the Israelite families.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec
    Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 Author(s): Lewis Bayles Paton Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Apr., 1913), pp. 1-53 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259319 . Accessed: 09/04/2012 16:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE Volume XXXII Part I 1913 Israel's Conquest of Canaan Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 LEWIS BAYLES PATON HARTFORD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY problem of Old Testament history is more fundamental NO than that of the manner in which the conquest of Canaan was effected by the Hebrew tribes. If they came unitedly, there is a possibility that they were united in the desert and in Egypt. If their invasions were separated by wide intervals of time, there is no probability that they were united in their earlier history. Our estimate of the Patriarchal and the Mosaic traditions is thus conditioned upon the answer that we give to this question.
    [Show full text]
  • JEPHTHAH with the EPHRAIMITES, THREE MINOR JUDGES Judges 12 Chapter 12 Continues the Story of the Judge Jephthah That We Began in Chapter 10 and 11
    JEPHTHAH WITH THE EPHRAIMITES, THREE MINOR JUDGES Judges 12 Chapter 12 continues the story of the judge Jephthah that we began in chapter 10 and 11. Quickly let me review for you where we have been. In chapter 10 the cycle of sin that we have seen over and over again in the book of Judges sinks to its lowest point. The Israelites have turned to worship every false god in the land, rather than the Lord. When they cry out to God because their enemies, the Ammonites, are oppressing them, God initially tells them “No, I will deliver you no more. Go and cry out to the gods which you have chosen; let them deliver you in your time of distress." Yet when they again cried out, "We have sinned! Do to us whatever seems best to You; only deliver us this day, we pray." And they put away their idols and served the Lord, the Lord could no longer endure their misery. But rather than waiting for God to deliver them, the Israelites began looking around for someone to save them. They picked Jephthah, the rejected son of Gilead. After Jephthah’s attempted diplomacy with the Ammonites fails, the Spirit of the Lord comes upon him and they defeat their enemies. But before he goes to battle, Jephthah made an unnecessary and foolish vow to offer to God as a burnt offering whatever came out of his house after he returned. His heart was broken as his only daughter is the one who meets him when he returns home.
    [Show full text]
  • Genealogical History of the Descendants of Machir of Scotland
    GENEALOGICAL HISTORY OF THE 1 DESCENDANTS OF MACHIR OF SCOTLAND BASED ON MATERIAL COMPILED BY MACHIRS AND MACHIR DESCENDANTS and by Mae R. Crummel & James L. Pyles, both of whom married Machir Descendants. Researched and Revised by Mrs. Lewis W. (Dolores) lvlachizr,of Washington, D. C. And Mrs. William F. (Violette) Machir, of Point Pleasant, W. Va. Published January-1964 By Mattox Printing Service, Pt. Pleasant, W. Va. ELEVW‘ Oentertb A GENEALOGICAL HISTORY OF THE DESCENDANTS OF MACHIR OF SCOTLAND Title Page Table of Contents Dedication Preface Introduction Coat of Arms Church Records from Scotland Acknowledgements Chap. 1. Issue of John Machir b. 1723 1. John Machir 2. Peter Machir 3. Jean Machir Brough 4. Col. James Machir b. 1761 or 1767 (1) Sarah Hopewell, dau. of Col. James Machir (2) John Machir, son of Col. James Machir (3) Eliza Hutton, dau. of Col. James Machir (4) Charles Fenton Machir, son of Col. Machir (5) James Machir II, son of Col. Machir Chap. II Issue of James Machir II 1799 . John Machir, b. 1822 Charles Fenton Machir Henry Machir Sarah Machir Elizabeth Machir F’°.U'!“P°.N-"" Ann Machir Foster, issue (1) Ernest Foster (2) James Machir Foster (3) William Russell Foster (4) Elizabeth Machir Vincent (5) Mary Kalb McNeill (6) Charles Fenton Foster (7) Joseph Vause Foster (8) Thomas Randolph Foster Jr. (9) Anna Shelby (Foster) Foster Chap. III Issue of Jane Amelia Wright, 7th child of James Machir II (b. 1799) ‘ 8. James Machir III, son of James Machir II 9. Susan D. Crummel, dau. of James Machir II 10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twelve Tribes of Israel by Felix Just, S.J., Ph.D
    The Twelve Tribes of Israel by Felix Just, S.J., Ph.D. In the Hebrew Bible (the Christian Old Testament), the Israelites are described as descendants of the twelve sons of Jacob (whose name was changed to Israel in Gen 32:28), the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham. The phrase "Twelve Tribes of Israel" (or simply "Twelve Tribes") sometimes occurs in the Bible (OT & NT) without any individual names being listed (Gen 49:28; Exod 24:4; 28:21; 39:14; Ezek 47:13; Matt 19:28; Luke 22:30; Acts 26:7; and Rev 21:12; cf. also "Twelve Tribes of the Dispersion" in James 1:1). More frequently, however, the names are explicitly mentioned. The Bible contains two dozen listings of the twelve sons of Jacob and/or tribes of Israel. Some of these are in very brief lists, while others are spread out over several paragraphs or chapters that discuss the distribution of the land or name certain representatives of each tribe, one after another. Surprisingly, however, each and every listing is slightly different from all the others, either in the order of the names mentioned or even in the specific names used (e.g., the two sons of Joseph are sometimes listed along with or instead of their father; and sometimes one or more names is omitted for various reasons). A few of the texts actually have more than 12 names! Upon closer analysis, one can discover several principles for the ordering and various reasons for the omission or substitution of some of the names, as explained in the notes below the following tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Parashat Pinchas 2020
    Temple Beth El Torah Study Rabbi Asher Knight Baruch atah, Adonai Eloheinu, Melech haolam, asher kid’shanu b’mitzvotav v’tzivanu laasok b’divrei Torah Blessed are You, Adonai our God, Sovereign of all, who hallows us with mitzvot, commanding us to engage with words of Torah. Numbers 26:63-65 (64) Among those [who were counted in the census in the desert] there was not a man of them that were numbered by Moses and Aaron the priest, when they recorded the Israelites in the wilderness of Sinai. (65) For the LORD had said of them: ‘They shall surely die in the wilderness.’ Not a man was left of them, except Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun. Numbers 27:1-11 (1) Then the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph came forward. These are the names of his daughters: Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah. (2) And they stood before Moses, and before Eleazar the priest, and before the chieftains and all the congregation, at the entrance of the tent of meeting, saying: (3) "Our father died in the wilderness. He was not among the faction that gathered together against the LORD in the company of Korah, but he died in his own sin; and he had no sons. (4) Why should the name of our father be lost from among his family, just because he had no son? Give us a possession amongst our father’s kinsmen!" (5) And Moses brought their case before the LORD.
    [Show full text]
  • Were the Galileans “Religious Jews” Or “Ethnic Judeans?”
    Were the Galileans “religious Jews” or “ethnic Judeans?” Markus Cromhout (Johannesburg)1 Research Associate: Faculty of Theology University of Pretoria Abstract This article focuses on an investigation into the ethnic identity of first-century Galileans. Its aim is to argue that the Galileans were not descendents of northern Israelites but were mostly descendents of “Jews” who came to live in the region during the Hasmonean expansion. The article demonstrates that this thesis is supported by Josephus and also by archaeological evidence. From the perspective of this thesis, the article contends that the term “Jew” does not apply to Galileans. First-century Galileans should rather be understood as “ethnic Judeans”. 1. INTRODUCTION Who were the Galileans in the first century CE? The nature of their identity, needless to say, is important to various aspects of New Testament scholarship. Galilee was the heartbeat of Jesus’ ministry, and many, if not most of his initial followers, came from this region. What is important therefore is how the people of Galilee related to Judeans/“Jews” and Jerusalem in the south; was their culture similar or different? Was the culture from Judea a foreign import, or was it part of their cultural heritage? Were they descendents of Northern Israelites, a hybrid of various peoples, “Jews”, or perhaps, more accurately, Judeans (in the ethnic-cultural sense)? It can be mentioned that the situation of Galilee was very different in the early history of Israel. Originally it was the territory of the tribes of Naphtali, Zebulun and probably Issachar as well (Jdg 5:7-21). In time they became subordinated to the monarchy and Temple in Jerusalem, and after Solomon’s 1 Markus Cromhout (PhD) participates in the research project “Biblical Theology and Hermeneutics”, directed by Dr Andries G van Aarde, honorary professor at the Faculty of Theology of the University of Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • DIVISION AMONG the ISRAELITES (Joshua 22) Lesson # 27 BIBLE
    DIVISION AMONG THE ISRAELITES (Joshua 22) Lesson # 27 BIBLE REFERENCE: (The book of Joshua) BOOK OF STUDY: Joshua Season of Study: Season of Bringing the Savior into the world HISTORY The book of Joshua belongs to the history section of the Old Testament. Joshua is embraced in the Season of “Bringing the Messiah into the world.” Joshua records the history of the Children of Israel from the death of the great leader and lawgiver Moses, to their entering the land of Canaan (the Promised Land), and until a great portion of the land was possessed by them as a people. The Children of Israel, during Joshua’s life, did not possess all the land promised them by God. Joshua, the minister to Moses, is credited with the authorship of this book bearing his name. The name Joshua is of Hebrew origin and means “Jehovah is Salvation.” Joshua is one of the two (2) men who departed Egypt with Moses and 1 was blessed and honored to cross into the Promised Land. The other was the man Caleb. All other men who departed from Egypt perished in the wilderness because of disobedience. The ATS Bible dictionary says of Joshua, “His last grand convocation of all Israel, at Shechem, and his solemn address to them and renewal of their covenant with God form the worthy close of a life on which in the sacred records no blot rests.” The book can be divided into three (3) sections: The defeat of the Canaanites, chapters 1 – 12; The Division of the land, chapters 13 – 21; and The Death of Joshua, chapters 22 – 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Marilynne Robinson's Gilead As Modern Midrash
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2010-11-29 Marilynne Robinson's Gilead as Modern Midrash Robert J. Taggart Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Classics Commons, and the Comparative Literature Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Taggart, Robert J., "Marilynne Robinson's Gilead as Modern Midrash" (2010). Theses and Dissertations. 2445. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2445 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Marilynne Robinson‟s Gilead as Modern Midrash Robbie Taggart A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts V. Stanley Benfell, Chair George Handley Susan Howe Department of Comparative Studies Brigham Young University December 2010 Copyright © 2010 Robbie Taggart All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Marilynne Robinson‟s Gilead as Modern Midrash Robbie Taggart Department of Comparative Studies Master of Arts It is the intent of this project to show that Marilynne Robinson‟s novel Gilead might be profitably read within the context of the rabbinical exegetical tradition of midrash. It examines Gilead as a midrashic retelling of the Abraham story in the Bible, and shows how reading it in this light illuminates some of the key theological and social concerns at play in the novel. Midrash offers a unique model for reading Gilead because it combines elements of intertextuality, narrative theology and formal exegesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface and Introduction
    Preface and Introduction Preface This book had its genesis in one of my early graduate courses at the Uni- versity of Toronto’s Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations. The essay I wrote on the Late Bronze / Iron I transition in Transjordan, per- haps not unlike the patterns of abatement and intensification that are de- scribed in the following pages, morphed into a dissertation and now into a monograph. The original thesis hinged partly on the projection that early Iron I levels would eventually be uncovered at Tall Mādabā within the modern city of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. As it turns out, only two years after the dissertation’s defense, the Tall Mādabā Archaeological Project, directed by Deborah Foran, did find Late Bronze / Iron I levels on the western acropolis. Mādabā, usually visited for its famous mosaics and Byzantine churches, could now officially take a front seat among the cities connected to early biblical and Moabite history. Recent renewed interests in Israel’s origins in Transjordan have also added to the sense that now might be an opportune time to begin a new process of integration. Given the plethora of well-documented opinions regarding the funda- mental question of Israel’s origins, it also seems appropriate to acknowledge the present synthesis’s inherent limitations. Although historical conclusions are drawn, the proposed model of ethnic identity in early Iron I Transjordan cannot pretend to substitute for a comprehensive history of the region along with a full analysis of textual and archaeological data. Nevertheless, the study may serve as a baseline to readers who are not familiar with current discus- sions on the settlement history of the region east of the Jordan in general and ethnic identities in particular.
    [Show full text]