DOCSLIB.ORG

Parashat Pinchas 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Temple Beth El Torah Study Rabbi Asher Knight Baruch atah, Adonai Eloheinu, Melech haolam, asher kid’shanu b’mitzvotav v’tzivanu laasok b’divrei Torah Blessed are You, Adonai our God, Sovereign of all, who hallows us with mitzvot, commanding us to engage with words of Torah. Numbers 26:63-65 (64) Among those [who were counted in the census in the desert] there was not a man of them that were numbered by Moses and Aaron the priest, when they recorded the Israelites in the wilderness of Sinai. (65) For the LORD had said of them: ‘They shall surely die in the wilderness.’ Not a man was left of them, except Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun. Numbers 27:1-11 (1) Then the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph came forward. These are the names of his daughters: Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah. (2) And they stood before Moses, and before Eleazar the priest, and before the chieftains and all the congregation, at the entrance of the tent of meeting, saying: (3) "Our father died in the wilderness. He was not among the faction that gathered together against the LORD in the company of Korah, but he died in his own sin; and he had no sons. (4) Why should the name of our father be lost from among his family, just because he had no son? Give us a possession amongst our father’s kinsmen!" (5) And Moses brought their case before the LORD. (6) And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying: (7) ’The daughters of Zelophehad speak justly: you should surely give them possession of an inheritance among their father’s kinsmen; and you shall transfer the inheritance of their father to them. (8) And you shall speak to the children of Israel, saying: If a man dies without having son, then you shall assign his inheritance to his daughter. (9) And if he has no daughter, then you shall give his inheritance unto his brothers. (10) And if he have no brothers, then you shall give his inheritance unto his father’s brothers. (11) And if his father have no brothers, then you shall give his inheritance unto his closest relative and he shall inherit it. This shall be for the children of Israel a law of judgement, as the LORD commanded Moses.’ Numbers 36:1-12 (1) And the family heads in the tribe of the children of Gilead, son of Machir, son of Manasheh, one of the tribes of Joseph, came forward and spoke before Moses, and before the chieftains, the family heads of the Israelites; (2) and they said: ‘The LORD commanded my lord [Moses] to assign the land for inheritance by lot to the Israelites; and my lord was commanded by the LORD to assign the inheritance of our brother Zelophehad to his daughters. (3) Now, if they marry any of the sons of the other Israelite tribes, their inheritance will be taken away from their ancestral portion, and will be added to the inheritance of the tribe into which they shall married; thus our portion of inheritance will be diminished. (4) And even when the Israelites observe the jubilee, their inheritance be added to the inheritance of the tribe into which they shall married; thus our portion of inheritance will be diminished. (5) So Moses instructed the Israelites according to LORD's word, saying: ‘The tribe of the sons of Joseph speaks justly. (6) This is what the LORD has commanded concerning the daughters of Zelophehad: They may marry anyone they wish, provided they marry only into the family of the tribe of their father. (7) No inheritance of the Israelites may pass from tribe to tribe; but the Israelites shall remain bound every one to the ancestral portion of his tribe. (8) Every daughter among the Israelite tribes who inherits a share must marry someone of the tribe of her father, in order that every Israelite be keep his ancestral share. (9) Thus no inheritance will pass from tribe to tribe; for the Israelite tribes of shall each be bound to its own portion.’ (10) Just as the LORD commanded Moses, the daughters of Zelophehad did. (11) For Mahlah, Tirzah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Noah, the daughters of Zelophehad, were married unto their father’s brothers’ sons. (12) They married into the families of the sons of Manasseh the son of Joseph, and their inheritance remained in the tribe of their father's clan Rashi, Bemidbar 27 (3) “and he was not, etc.” Since they came to say, “but he died in his own sin”, they had to say that he did not die because of participating in the sin of those who complained (Lev. 27:3), nor because he was amongst the company of Korach who incited the people against the Holy One, but he died in his own sin, and did not cause others to sin with him. Rabbi Akiva said he was the woodcutter on Shabbat, and Rabbi Shimon said he was one of those who tried to invade Eretz Yisrael. Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition) 2:11:1 (1) Our Rabbis taught: "The wood-gatherer was Zelophehad, and so it is said (Num. 15:32) "And while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, and they found a man gathering wood on the Sabbath," and it is further said (Num. 27:3) "Our father died in the wilderness." We deduce this from the similar word Midbar (wilderness) which is found in both places. Just as the first text refers to Zelophehad, so the wood-gatherer was also Zelophehad." This is the opinion of Rabbi Akiba. Rabbi Judah ben Beteira then said to him: "Akiba! Whether your opinion be true or false, you will have to account for it [at the time of Divine Judgment]; for if your words are true, you disclosed the name of a man whom the Torah shielded; and if your opinion is not correct you have slandered an upright person." Yalkut Shimoni, Bamidbar 27:2 "And they stood before Moses," (Num 27:2) Each of the five daughters presented one of the five pleas. The first said, "Our father dies in the wilderness," The second said, "He was not one of the faction of Korach." The third said, "but he died in his own sin." The fourth: "He had no sons." The fifth: "Why should our father's name be lost to his family?" Sifri on Bemidbar 27 When the daughters of Zelophehad heard that the land of Israel was to be divided according to tribes, according to the males and not the females, they gathered together to make a plan. They said, God’s mercy and compassion is not like the compassion of mankind. Mankind favors men over women. God is not like that. God's compassion extends to men and women alike... Rashi on Numbers 27:5:1 (5) “And Moses brought their case.” This topic should have been written by Moses, but the daughters of Zelophehad merited and it was written by them. Bava Batra 119b:9-12 It was taught: The daughters of Zelophehad were exceedingly wise, knew well how to expound Scripture, and were perfectly virtuous. They were exceedingly wise since they chose to speak at the right time; for just then ... They were also perfectly virtuous, since they married only men who were worthy of them." Yalkut Shim’oni Pinchas “Give us a share in the land,” Rabbi Natan said: the strength of women is better than that of men, the men said, "Let us appoint (nit'nah) a leader and let us return to Egypt" while the women said, "Give to us (t'nah) a share in the land"… At what point did the daughters of Zelophehad stand before Moshe? At the time when the Israelites said, “”Let us appoint a leader, and let us return to Egypt.” Moses said to them, Israel is asking to return to Egypt and you are asking for an inheritance in Israel?! The daughters answered: We know that in the end Israel will take possession of the Holy Land. Midrashim of the Daughter's of Zelophad by Rivka Lovitz "The daughters of Zelophehad, of Manassite family—son of Hepher son of Gilead son of Machir son of Manasseh son of Joseph—came forward. The names of the daughters were Mahlah, Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah." and (צלפחד) Why, in the beginning, are they called the daughters of Zelophad (צל) only later are they each mentioned by name? This is due to the shadow that they had in the beginning. For at the start, they were in (פחד) and the fear the shadow of their father, and they were afraid to go in front of the assembly. As they drew closer together, this one to the other, they became confident and were thus called by their names, as it is written, "The daughters of Zelophad ... and these are the names of his daughters." The cynics in that generation would known to say: The daughters of Zelophad didn't have the hearts and minds in the right place. They said: They did it for power, they did it for wealth, in order to become the equals of men in matters of inheritance, and they did not do it for the sake of heaven. Thus the Torah says: "The plea of Zelophad's daughters is is that of honesty כן Where here the language of "(כן) just (Just" because it was correct what they (the cynics' .(כנות) said: They did it for power, they did it for wealth, in order to become the equals of men in matters of inheritance, for the sake of heaven they did it.
Recommended publications
  • The Significance of "Knees"

    The Significance of "Knees"

    THE SIGNIFICANCE OF "KNEES" We are told in the scriptures that Rachael was jealous of her sister Leah because Rachael was barren and Leah was able to bear children. Rachael went to Jacob and said: "Behold my maid Bilhah, go in and lie with her; and she shall bear upon my knees that I may also have children by her." Gen. 30:3 Jacob did have a child with Bilhah, and Rachael adopted Dan as soon as he was born, and he became her son. This act by Rachael concerning her knees was an act of adoption. The ages of Manasseh and Ephraim cannot be exactly determined, but we know that they were born when Joseph was between the age of 30 and 37 (Gen. 41:46-52). We are not told whether they are twins, or, if they are not twins, how many years are between their births. To find out how old they were when Jacob came into Egypt we must take Joseph's age when Jacob arrived, which is 39 and subtract the age of Joseph when they were born (30-37). For our purposes we will take the greater age to make his sons as young as they might have been (39-37=2). Therefore, the youngest that Joseph's sons could have been was 2 years of age when Jacob arrived in Egypt. The oldest possibility would have been 9 years of age. Joseph's two sons were blessed by their grandfather, Jacob (Israel), but it appears that Jacob did not bless Manasseh and Ephraim until he was near death.
  • The Good Samaritan Inn 55 NATIONAL PARKS and NATURE Mosaic Museum RESERVES

    The Good Samaritan Inn 55 NATIONAL PARKS and NATURE Mosaic Museum RESERVES

    BUY AN ISRAEL NATURE AND PARKS AUTHORITY SUBSCRIPTION FOR UNLIMITED FREE ENTRY TO The Good Samaritan Inn 55 NATIONAL PARKS AND NATURE Mosaic Museum RESERVES. A lioness from the Gaza mosaic Rules of Conduct ■ Do not harm the antiquities: Do not carve on them, walk on them or pour water on them. ■ Do not collect “souvenirs” from remains scattered in the area. ■ Do not enter places that are off-limits for visitors. Nearby Sites: ■ Do not cross fences or roll stones. ■ Please keep the area clean. Qumran Location of the Good Samaritan Inn Mosaic Museum National Park about 25 minutes’ drive The museum is on the southern side of the Jerusalem–Jericho road (road 1) between kilometer markers 80 and 81. The interchange affords easy access from whichever direction you approach. To reserve a guided tour for a group, email: You Enot Tsukim are here Nature Reserve [email protected] about 25 minutes’ drive Hours: Daily from 8:00 to 17:00. En Prat During winter time, the site closes one hour earlier. Nature Reserve On Fridays and holiday eves, the site closes one hour earlier. about 20 minutes’ drive Entry is permitted up to one hour before closing. Text: Ya‘acov Shkolnik Translation: Miriam Feinberg Vamosh 6.18 Photos: Israel Nature and Parks Authority Archive; Ya‘acov Shkolnik; Tal Romano; Amir Aloni Production: Adi Greenbaum www.parks.org.il I *3639 I © Israel Nature and Parks Authority The Good Samaritan Inn, Tel: 02-6338230 established on the initiative of the archaeologist Dr. Yitzhak Welcome to the Magen, who served as the head of the Judea and Samaria Inn of the Good Samaritan Archaeology Unit.
  • Rebuke in Tanḥuma- Yelammedenu Literature

    Rebuke in Tanḥuma- Yelammedenu Literature

    chapter 8 An Inescapable Obligation: Rebuke in Tanḥuma- Yelammedenu Literature The final chapter of our exploration of early Jewish and Christian responses to Lev. 19:17 takes us to a late (or “post-classical”) midrashic text of ambigu- ous provenance: Midrash Tanḥuma. Like the term Midrash, Tanḥuma refers to both a process or genre of literature and an actual work.1 What I shall refer to as Tanḥuma Yelammedenu or simply Yelammedenu denotes a process or genre of Midrash that involves a particular set of features, especially a record of stu- dents requesting of a teacher that he teach them – yelammedenu rabbenu, the phrase from which this genre derives its name.2 Yelammedenu traditions ap- pear in a number of later midrashic texts including Shemot Rabbah, Bemidbar Rabbah, and Devarim Rabbah, as well as Pesiqta Rabbati. What I shall designate here as Midrash Tanḥuma or simply Tanḥuma is a collection of midrashim or- ganized according to a triennial cycle of Pentateuchal readings. This collec- tion, which will be our primary focus, appears in two main versions typically referred to as the “printed edition” and the “Buber edition,” the latter named for its editor Salomon Buber. Previous generations of scholars debated the existence of an “early Tanḥuma” that preserved more “original” versions of the traditions found in our extant collections.3 There has also been significant debate over the dating of the Tanḥuma collections more generally. Contemporary work on Tanḥuma Yelammedenu suggests that this genre “began to crystallize toward the end of the Byzantine period in Palestine (5–7th cen. CE), but continued to evolve and spread throughout the Diaspora well into the Middle Ages, sometimes devel- oping different recensions of a common text.”4 The major versions of Midrash Tanḥuma as we know them stem from the medieval period with the printed edition likely redacted in geonic Babylonia and the Buber edition redacted in 1 See Bregman, Sifrut Tanḥuma-Yelammedenu, chap.
  • Parshat Naso

    Parshat Naso

    Parshat Naso A free excerpt from the Kehot Publication Society's Chumash Bemidbar/Book of Numbers with commentary based on the works of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, produced by Chabad of California. The full volume is available for purchase at www.kehot.com. For personal use only. All rights reserved. The right to reproduce this book or portions thereof, in any form, requires permission in writing from Chabad of California, Inc. THE TORAH - CHUMASH BEMIDBAR WITH AN INTERPOLATED ENGLISH TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARY BASED ON THE WORKS OF THE LUBAVITCHER REBBE Copyright © 2006-2009 by Chabad of California THE TORAHSecond,- revisedCHUMASH printingB 2009EMIDBAR WITH AN INTERPOLATED ENGLISH TRANSLATION AND COMMENTARYA BprojectASED ON of THE WORKS OF ChabadTHE LUBAVITCH of CaliforniaREBBE 741 Gayley Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024 310-208-7511Copyright / Fax © 310-208-58112004 by ChabadPublished of California, by Inc. Kehot Publication Society 770 Eastern Parkway,Published Brooklyn, by New York 11213 Kehot718-774-4000 Publication / Fax 718-774-2718 Society 770 Eastern Parkway,[email protected] Brooklyn, New York 11213 718-774-4000 / Fax 718-774-2718 Order Department: 291 KingstonOrder Avenue, Department: Brooklyn, New York 11213 291 Kingston718-778-0226 Avenue / /Brooklyn, Fax 718-778-4148 New York 11213 718-778-0226www.kehot.com / Fax 718-778-4148 www.kehotonline.com All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book All rightsor portions reserved, thereof, including in any the form, right without to reproduce permission, this book or portionsin writing, thereof, from in anyChabad form, of without California, permission, Inc. in writing, from Chabad of California, Inc. The Kehot logo is a trademark ofThe Merkos Kehot L’Inyonei logo is a Chinuch,trademark Inc.
  • TORAH SPARKS Meat with Milk - Like Blood, Another Symbol of Life

    TORAH SPARKS Meat with Milk - Like Blood, Another Symbol of Life

    ב׳׳ה (Dvar Torah continued from front page…) so bitterly about missing meat that God sent enough quail to kill them (Bemidbar 11:4-34). With the building of the Mishkan and institution of the sacrifices, the consumption of meat was both limited, and elevated, further. One could only eat the meat of certain kosher animals (see Vayikra 11 Parashat Shmini, and Devarim 14:3-21 in our parashah), and only then when bringing them as a korban shelamim (peace offering) - the main course of a shared holy meal with the priests and God. And to the prohibition of consuming blood, the Torah added the prohibition of eating TORAH SPARKS meat with milk - like blood, another symbol of life. With everything trending in that direction, it may seem odd that in our parashah Parashat Re’eh we find a verse that widens the consumption of meat. Deuteronomy 12:20 says “When the LORD your God expands your borders, as he has promised you, and Shabbat Rosh Hodesh you say, ‘I shall eat some meat’, because you long to eat meat; you may eat meat August 31, 2019 | 30 Av 5779 whenever you wish.” We might have expected this to mean that altars would be Annual (Deuteronomy 11:26-16:17): Etz Hayim p. 1061-1084; Hertz p. 799-818 set up throughout Israelite territory so that one would not have to travel to bring Triennial (Deuteronomy 15:1-16:17): Etz Hayim p. 1076-1084; Hertz p. 811-818 and consume sacrificial meat. But with the Torah’s preference for a single Haftarah (Isaiah 66:1-24,23): Etz Hayim p.
  • BEMIDBAR SELECTED SHORTS Rabbi Eliot Malomet May 15, 2021 4 Sivan 5781

    BEMIDBAR SELECTED SHORTS Rabbi Eliot Malomet May 15, 2021 4 Sivan 5781

    BEMIDBAR SELECTED SHORTS Rabbi Eliot Malomet May 15, 2021 4 Sivan 5781 Egypt He counted them (Exodus 12:37), when רבדמב א :׳ א׳ many of them fell in consequence of their having )א( יַ ו דְ ֵבַּ ר֨ 'ה ֶשֹׁמ־לֶא ה֛ מְ בּ דִ בְּ ַ ר֥ ניִ ס ַ ֖ י ֹאְ בּ לֶה֣ ﬠוֹמ ֵ ד֑ ֩דָחֶאְ בּ ֹחַל ד֨ שֶׁ שֶׁ ד֨ ֹחַל ֩דָחֶאְ בּ ד֑ ֵ ﬠוֹמ לֶה֣ ֹאְ בּ י ֖ ַ ניִ ס ר֥ ַ בְּ דִ מְ בּ ה֛ ֶשֹׁמ־לֶא 'ה ר֨ ֵבַּ דְ יַ ו )א( worshipped the golden calf He counted them to ִנֵשַּׁה י֜ ָנָשַּׁבּ ה֣ ִנֵשַּׁה תי֗ ָתאֵצְל ם֛ ֶאֵמ ץֶר֥ ַרְצִמ י֖ םִ ֹמאֵל ׃רֽ Numbers 1:1 ascertain the number of those left; when he was (1) On the first day of the second month, in the about to make His Shechinah dwell amongst second year following the exodus from the land of them, He again took their census; for on the first Egypt, the LORD spoke to Moses in the wil- day of Nisan the Tabernacle was erected and derness of Sinai, in the Tent of Meeting, saying… shortly afterwards, on the first day of Iyar, He So much information compressed in that first counted them. What’s the deal with all this verse. We are in the desert. It’s year two. The counting? Counting is a process of ordering. exodus is behind us. Rabbi jonathan Sacks notes Counting is organizing and shaping. Counting is the contrast between Numbers and Exodus. imposition of frameworks and structure.
  • Manasseh: Reflections on Tribe, Territory and Text

    Manasseh: Reflections on Tribe, Territory and Text

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Vanderbilt Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Archive MANASSEH: REFLECTIONS ON TRIBE, TERRITORY AND TEXT By Ellen Renee Lerner Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion August, 2014 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Douglas A. Knight Professor Jack M. Sasson Professor Annalisa Azzoni Professor Herbert Marbury Professor Tom D. Dillehay Copyright © 2014 by Ellen Renee Lerner All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people I would like to thank for their role in helping me complete this project. First and foremost I would like to express my deepest gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee: Professor Douglas A. Knight, Professor Jack M. Sasson, Professor Annalisa Azzoni, Professor Herbert Marbury, and Professor Tom Dillehay. It has been a true privilege to work with them and I hope to one day emulate their erudition and the kind, generous manner in which they support their students. I would especially like to thank Douglas Knight for his mentorship, encouragement and humor throughout this dissertation and my time at Vanderbilt, and Annalisa Azzoni for her incredible, fabulous kindness and for being a sounding board for so many things. I have been lucky to have had a number of smart, thoughtful colleagues in Vanderbilt’s greater Graduate Dept. of Religion but I must give an extra special thanks to Linzie Treadway and Daniel Fisher -- two people whose friendship and wit means more to me than they know.
  • Chukat Artscroll P.838 | Haftarah P.1187 Hertz P.652 | Haftarah P.664 Soncino P.898 | Haftarah P.911

    Chukat Artscroll P.838 | Haftarah P.1187 Hertz P.652 | Haftarah P.664 Soncino P.898 | Haftarah P.911

    13 July 2019 10 Tammuz 5779 Shabbat ends London 10.16pm Jerusalem 8.28pm Volume 31 No. 45 Chukat Artscroll p.838 | Haftarah p.1187 Hertz p.652 | Haftarah p.664 Soncino p.898 | Haftarah p.911 In loving memory of Yehuda ben Yaakov HaCohen “Speak to the Children of Israel, and they shall take to you a completely red cow, which is without blemish, and upon which a yoke has not come” (Bemidbar 19:2). 1 Sidrah Summary: Chukat 1st Aliya (Kohen) – Bemidbar 19:1-17 Kadesh through his land. Despite Moshe’s God tells Moshe and Aharon to teach the nation assurances that they will not take any of his the laws of the Red Heifer ( ). The resources, Edom refuses and comes out to unblemished animal, which hPaasr anhe vAedr uhmada h a yoke threaten the Israelites militarily. The Israelites upon it, is to be given to Elazar, Aharon’s son, who turn away. must slaughter it outside the camp. It is then to be 5th Aliya (Chamishi) – 20:22-21:9 burned by a different Kohen, who must also throw The nation travels from Kadesh to Mount Hor. some cedar wood, hyssop and crimson thread Upon God’s command, Moshe, Aharon and Elazar into the fire. Both he and Elazar will become ritually ascend Mount Hor. Elazar dons Aharon’s special impure ( ) through this preparatory process. (High Priest) garments, after which In contratasmt, ethe ashes of the Heifer, when mixed AKhohareonn G daiedso.l The nation mourns Aharon’s death with water, are used to purify someone who has for 30 days (see p.3 article).
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    INTRODUCTION Hanne Trautner-Kromann n this introduction I want to give the necessary background information for understanding the nine articles in this volume. II start with some comments on the Hebrew or Jewish Bible and the literature of the rabbis, based on the Bible, and then present the articles and the background information for these articles. In Jewish tradition the Bible consists of three main parts: 1. Torah – Teaching: The Five Books of Moses: Genesis (Bereshit in Hebrew), Exodus (Shemot), Leviticus (Vajikra), Numbers (Bemidbar), Deuteronomy (Devarim); 2. Nevi’im – Prophets: (The Former Prophets:) Joshua, Judges, Samuel I–II, Kings I–II; (The Latter Prophets:) Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezek- iel; (The Twelve Small Prophets:) Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephania, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi; 3. Khetuvim – Writings: Psalms, Proverbs, Job, The Song of Songs, Ruth, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah, Chronicles I–II1. The Hebrew Bible is often called Tanakh after these three main parts: Torah, Nevi’im and Khetuvim. The Hebrew Bible has been interpreted and reinterpreted by rab- bis and scholars up through the ages – and still is2. Already in the Bible itself there are examples of interpretation (midrash). The books of Chronicles, for example, can be seen as a kind of midrash on the 10 | From Bible to Midrash books of Samuel and Kings, repeating but also changing many tradi- tions found in these books. In talmudic times,3 dating from the 1st to the 6th century C.E.(Common Era), the rabbis developed and refined the systems of interpretation which can be found in their literature, often referred to as The Writings of the Sages.
  • Numbers 36 Commentary

    Numbers 36 Commentary

    Numbers 36 Commentary PREVIOUSNumbers: Journey to God's Rest-Land by Irving Jensen- used by permission NEXT Source: Ryrie Study Bible THE BOOK OF NUMBERS "Wilderness Wandering" WALKING WANDERING WAITING Numbers 1-12 Numbers 13-25 Numbers 26-36 Counting & Cleansing & Carping & 12 Spies & Aaron & Serpent of Second Last Days of Sections, Camping Congregation Complaining Death in Levites in Brass & Census 7 Moses as Sanctuaries & Nu 1-4 Nu 5-8 Nu 9-12 Desert Wilderness Story of Laws of Leader Settlements Nu 13-16 Nu 17-18 Balaam Israel Nu 31-33 Nu 34-36 Nu 21-25 Nu 26-30 Law Rebellion New Laws & Order & Disorder for the New Order Old Tragic New Generation Transition Generation Preparation for the Journey: Participation in the Journey: Prize at end of the Journey: Moving Out Moving On Moving In At Sinai To Moab At Moab Mt Sinai Mt Hor Mt Nebo En Route to Kadesh En Route to Nowhere En Route to Canaan (Mt Sinai) (Wilderness) (Plains of Moab) A Few Weeks to 38 years, A Few 2 Months 3 months, 10 days Months Christ in Numbers = Our "Lifted-up One" (Nu 21:9, cp Jn 3:14-15) Author: Moses Numbers 36:1 And the heads of the fathers' households of the family of the sons of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of the sons of Joseph, came near and spoke before Moses and before the leaders, the heads of the fathers' households of the sons of Israel, BGT Numbers 36:1 κα προσλθον ο ρχοντες φυλς υν Γαλααδ υο Μαχιρ υο Μανασση κ τς φυλς υν Ιωσηφ κα λλησαν ναντι Μωυσ κα ναντι Ελεαζαρ το ερως κα ναντι τν ρχντων οκων πατριν υν Ισραηλ NET Numbers 36:1 Then the heads of the family groups of the Gileadites, the descendant of Machir, the descendant of Manasseh, who were from the Josephite families, approached and spoke before Moses and the leaders who were the heads of the Israelite families.
  • Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec

    Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec

    Israel's Conquest of Canaan: Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 Author(s): Lewis Bayles Paton Reviewed work(s): Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Apr., 1913), pp. 1-53 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3259319 . Accessed: 09/04/2012 16:53 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org JOURNAL OF BIBLICAL LITERATURE Volume XXXII Part I 1913 Israel's Conquest of Canaan Presidential Address at the Annual Meeting, Dec. 27, 1912 LEWIS BAYLES PATON HARTFORD THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY problem of Old Testament history is more fundamental NO than that of the manner in which the conquest of Canaan was effected by the Hebrew tribes. If they came unitedly, there is a possibility that they were united in the desert and in Egypt. If their invasions were separated by wide intervals of time, there is no probability that they were united in their earlier history. Our estimate of the Patriarchal and the Mosaic traditions is thus conditioned upon the answer that we give to this question.
  • Shelach Lecha Shabbat Mevarechim

    Shelach Lecha Shabbat Mevarechim

    17 June 2017 23 Sivan 5777 Shabbat ends London 10.27pm Jerusalem 8.29pm Volume 29 No. 38 Shelach Lecha Shabbat Mevarechim. Rosh Chodesh Tammuz is next Shabbat and Sunday Artscroll p.798 | Hertz p.623 | Soncino p.860 In memory of Harav Yisrael ben Harav Uriah “They arrived at the Valley of Eshkol and cut from there a vine with one cluster of grapes, and bore it on a double pole, and of the pomegranates and of the figs” (Bemidbar 13:23). 1 Sidrah Summary: Shelach Lecha 1st Aliya (Kohen) – Bemidbar 13:1-20 20 will die in the desert over the next 40 years. God tells Moshe to send spies into Cana’an (later The spies die in a plague, except Yehoshua the Land of Israel), one from each tribe. The and Calev. Moshe tells the nation about the names of the spies are listed. One of them is 40 year decree and they mourn. Despite Moshe’s Hoshea, whose name Moshe changes to discouragement, a section of the people attempt Yehoshua (Joshua). Moshe instructs the spies to enter the Land but are brutally thwarted by the to enter the Land from the south, look at its Amalekites and Cana’anites. nature and check the strength of its inhabitants. God tells Moshe to instruct the nation that when Point to Consider: why did Moshe change they bring animal offerings, these should be Yehoshua’s name? (See Rashi to 13:17). accompanied by a bread meal offering (mincha) and a wine libation (nesech). 2nd Aliya (Levi) – 13:21-14:7 Question: why did the punishment last for 40 The spies enter the Land.