DOCSLIB.ORG

Blackfoot Swan Landscape Restoration Project (BSLRP)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blackfoot Swan Landscape Restoration Project (BSLRP) In This Edition: For the greater good. New Direction From the Regional Forester Blackfoot Swan Landscape Restoration Project Mid Swan Interview with Joe Fortier, Photo Interpretation Lead New Team Members Project Contact Sandy Mack Phone: 406-329-3817 E-mail: [email protected] BSLRP Webpage Blackfoot Swan Landscape Restoration Project (BSLRP) USDA Forest Service April 2017 Hello and Happy Summer Solstice! We have been completing staff work and are, at last, ready and aligned for intensive working sessions with interested parties in May. I’d like to share some activities since SWCC Line Officers: our last, September 2016, newsletter including two major Line Officers’ decisions. A few Flathead National Forest: of these items are highlighted in this update. Chip Weber, Rich Kehr September 2016 Lolo National Forest: Line Officers’ Decision to adopt and adapt the photo interpretation approach used Timothy Garcia, Rachel Feigley on the Okanagan-Wenatchee National Forest (O-W) to address successional patches and landscape patterns, as well as compositions and structure. The Southwestern Helena-Lewis & Clark National Crown Collaborative support this decision. Forests: Quantitative natural and future range of variability for vegetation attributes on the William Avey, Sara Mayben, Michael Stansberry BSLRP landscape completed. This analysis does not include the ecologically important landscape pattern process and function analysis. Aquatic Focus Areas, given future temperature range predictions for the Northern Rockies Adaption Project (NRAP). Refined Vegetation Disturbance model. 1 October Engaged with and discussed BSLRP with the SWCC Aquatic Working Group and full SWCC at their Meetings. Shared BSLR story to Washington Office staff during the Chief’s Region 1 Review. November – Rangers and Core Team receive training from Okanogan -Wenatchee National Forest (O-W) Practitioners. December – Co-sponsored, with the Southwestern Crown Collaborative, National Forest Foundation, and Northern Rocky Moun- tain Fire Science Network, a ‘sold out’ 2 day Workshop titled, From Theory to Practice: Landscape-Level Restoration Principles. 10 speakers addressed participants from 8 National Forests, two Regions, 7 Non-government organizations, 2 Businesses, and 2 Fed- eral and one state agency. January 2017 “Look deep into nature and Partnered with the Montana Natural Heritage Program to use their photo interpretation then you will understand expertise to complete delineations and assigning biodiversity attributes to aerial photos. everything better.” Exchanged BSLRP concepts with SWCC. Albert Einstein February Gave the Swan Lake, Seeley Lake and Lincoln Ranger Districts an interactive training on our assessment approach . A Multi-partner Grant Proposal submitted to the Great Northern Landscape Conservation Cooperative for increasing partner capacity and helping implement our successional patch and pattern large-landscape assessment approach. Montana Natural Heritage Program photo interpreters trained by practitioners from the O-W. March Aerial flights completed and last photos delivered. Photo delineation and attribution starts. Line Officers’ Decision – Break 1.3 million acres up into 3-5 decisions using photo interpretation for successional landscape pat- terns, as well as compositions and structure with the first decision encompassing approximately 250,000 acres within the Swan Lake Ranger District by October 2019. Four team vacancies filled and full Core Team membership in place. USFWS Partner Consultation Biologist Vacant. BSLRP Strategic Management Plan V1.0 ready for signature. Will be updated, improved quarterly. Along with the SWCC and contributing partners we continue to learn as we develop our understandings and adaptations of this process. I’m very excited to work with our new team members and interested parties to complete the assessment phase and move into the National Environmental Policy Act Process, collaboratively, professionally and with urgency. Sandy Mack Team Lead NEW DIRECTION FROM THE REGIONAL FORESTER After gathering input from staff, collaborators, and contributing partners, on March 3, 2017, Regional Forester Leanne Martin gave the BSLRP Team new direction to complete one Record of Decision (ROD) for the highest priority area within the Southwestern Crown landscape by the end of fiscal year 2019. The remainder of the BSLRP area will be completed in an additional 3-4 ROD’s by 2023. The team used a prioritization tool based on biophysical, value and risk elements using existing R1 data . This will allow us to apply our assessment and NEPA management approach to our first area and use what we learn for the remainder of the BSLRP area. 2 BLACKFOOT SWAN LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROJECT MID SWAN BACK TO MAIN PAGE The first project will be called the Blackfoot Swan Landscape Restoration Project Mid Swan (hereafter referred to as BSLRP Mid Swan). The BSLRP Mid Swan analysis area will focus on the following 14 watersheds: Lost Creek, Metcalf Lake, Soup Creek, Woodward Creek, Goat Creek, Cedar Creek, Van Lake, Lion Creek, Piper Creek, Jim Creek, Pony Creek, Cold Creek, Condon Creek, and Elk Creek (see map on Page 4). The project will analyze approximately 250,000 acres of lands within the Swan Lake Ranger District on the Flathead National Forest. The project purpose will remain to reduce the risk of uncharacteristic wildfire and conserve terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity across the Southwestern Crown Collaborative landscape, taking into account the potential influence of climate change. The following is the timeline for the BSLRP Mid Swan Project: “Conservation is the foresighted utilization, preservation and/or renewal of forests, water, lands and minerals, for the greatest good of the greatest number for the longest time.” Gifford Pinchot 3 Map of the Blackfoot Swan Landscape Restoration Project Mid Swan Project Area: 4 MEET JOE FORTIER, PHOTO INTERPRETATION LEAD BACK TO MAIN PAGE Interview with Joe Fortier Photo Interpretation Lead, Montana Natural Heritage Program What’s your background? Hobbies? Interests? I’m originally from Maine. I received my Undergraduate Degree in Geography and a Masters in Geographic Information Science from Clark University in Worcester, MA. After school I did some remote sensing work in Kenya for the African Conservation Centre, then moved to Washington DC where I worked as a Remote Sensing Crop Analyst for the USDA Foreign Agriculture Service. Having always wanted to see the Rockies, in 2012 I packed my car and moved to North Idaho where I apprenticed at two small, organic farms over the course of a year. As far as hobbies, I love everything outdoors; in the winter I’m an avid bread baker. How did you start working with the Montana Natural Heritage Program? After my farm apprenticeships in Idaho, I began looking for a job in the GIS/remote sensing field that could keep me in the northwest. I was fortunate to find a position with the Montana Natural Heritage Program in 2013 as part of their statewide effort to map Montana’s wetlands. I’ve since taken on a multiple of other roles through them, including whitebark pine abundance mapping for a number of National Forests across Montana and Idaho. Do you have past experience in the Swan, Clearwater, Blackfoot landscape – and what type. As part of my position at MTNHP I worked on a number of wetland field assessments looking at fens and riparian networks from the Swan River to Copper Creek. Not to mention my own personal time hiking and backpacking the area, particularly in the Swan range. What’s your interest, if any, in “landscape management” versus management at a smaller scale? I haven’t truly engaged in a landscape management project before. Thinking about it from the science side of things there is a lot to be said about the ability, in smaller scale management, to focus on the unique needs of the local environment, which tend to get lost as you scale up. But I also see the benefit to landscape scale management and partnership with other land managers and stakeholders in an area, which can greatly strengthen the federal government’s position to implement change. I understand the BSLRP it’s trying to find a happy medium between both: perform a landscape scale analysis to identify broad landscape patterns and departures bringing in the knowledge of local partners and scientists early to make a more pointed proposed action for implementation. How is the Photo interpretation work going for you? Any Challenges and/or Successes? It’s going well, it has been an interesting and unique experience. My previous photo interpretation experience has been based on 2D NAIP imagery but working in the 3D environment is a vastly different experience. It adds a level of information to the imagery, beyond spectral response, that’s been a huge asset to forest classification. The initial challenge was preparing for the PI work before we had access to the imagery or the exact methods we’re meant to follow. After our training and a month into the work, I think our whole team is feeling pretty comfortable with the process and our ability to make informed calls. We’re a close group so frequent conferences are called to help with the tougher decisions or make use of the various expertise each one of us brings to the table. We will be checking our calls in the field soon. Have you had and surprises or “ah ha” moments to date in this work? Coming into this with my experience both photo interpreting of wetlands and past attempts at species level mapping using remote sensing techniques I was definitely skeptical about picking out forest structure and tree species from the imagery with any degree ofac curacy. But as always I’m amazed by the human brain’s ability to identify patterns in complex environments, the 3D imagery makes a lot more possible than I expected. 5 NEW TEAM MEMBERS BACK TO MAIN PAGE The following team members join Sandy Mack (Team Leader), Wade Sims (Aquatics Ecologist), and Chip Fisher (GIS Analyst): Don Long, Fire Ecologist Donald Long is a Fire Ecologist at the Fire Sciences Laboratory of the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Missoula, MT.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Fork of the Flathead River Originates in the South End of the Bob Marshall Wilderness and Flows Northward to Hungry Horse Reservoir
    The South Fork Acclaimed as one of Montana’s most pristine and remote rivers, the Wild and Scenic South Fork of the Flathead River originates in the south end of the Bob Marshall Wilderness and flows northward to Hungry Horse Reservoir. Boats and supplies are generally packed in on mules or horses over mountain passes to reach the headwa- ters and then packed again from the take-out just above Meadow Creek Gorge, to Meadow Creek Trailhead. There are several commercial outfitters who can provide packing services or full-service floats, but plan ahead as they have limited space available. The floating season is generally from mid-June through late August. The river is Class II-III with standing river waves and shallow rocky shoals. Log jams and other hazards exist, and may change and move seasonally. Always scout from shore prior to floating into any river feature without clear passage. Due to its remoteness, the South Fork requires advanced planning and preparation. Contact the Spotted Bear Ranger Station for updated informa- tion on river and trail conditions, regulations and list of permitted outfitters. Restrictions All sections of the South Fork • Solid human waste containment and the use of fire pans and blankets is recommended. • Store your attractants in a bear resistant manner, in an approved container or vehicle, or hang. Section Specific Restrictions - Confluence with Youngs Creek to Cedar Flats - • Wilderness Section • The party size is limited to 15 people per group and 35 head of stock per party. • Use of weed free stock feed is required. • No wheeled carts or wheelbarrows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Summit Brochure with Maps.Pdf
    THE SUMMIT SEELEY LAKE, MONTANA $3,800,000 | 70± ACRES LISTING AGENT: BILL MCDAVID 901 S. HIGGINS AVE., STE. 103 MISSOULA, MONTANA 59801 P: 406.542.3762 M: 406.360.3141 [email protected] THE SUMMIT SEELEY LAKE, MONTANA $3,800,000 | 70± ACRES LISTING AGENT: BILL MCDAVID 901 S. HIGGINS AVE., STE. 103 MISSOULA, MONTANA 59801 P: 406.542.3762 M: 406.360.3141 [email protected] Land… that’s where it all begins. Whether it is ranch land or family retreats, working cattle ranches, plantations, farms, estancias, timber or recreational ranches for sale, it all starts with the land. Since 1946, Hall and Hall has specialized in serving the owners and prospective owners of quality rural real estate by providing mortgage loans, appraisals, land management, auction and brokerage services within a unique, integrated partnership structure. Our business began by cultivating long-term relationships built upon personal service and expert counsel. We have continued to grow today by being client-focused and results-oriented—because while it all starts with the land, we know it ends with you. WITH OFFICES IN: DENVER, COLORADO BOZEMAN, MONTANA EATON, COLORADO MISSOULA, MONTANA STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, COLORADO VALENTINE, NEBRASKA STERLING, COLORADO COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS SUN VALLEY, IDAHO LAREDO, TEXAS HUTCHINSON, KANSAS LUBBOCK, TEXAS BUFFALO, WYOMING MELISSA, TEXAS BILLINGS, MONTANA SOUTHEASTERN US SALES | AUCTIONS | FINANCE | APPRAISALS | MANAGEMENT © 2019 HALL AND HALL | WWW.HALLANDHALL.COM | [email protected] — 2 — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Montana’s Seeley-Swan Valley consists of two watersheds, the Clearwater River flowing south and the Swan River flowing north off a glacial moraine divide that separates the two.
    [Show full text]
  • SP114-Earthqake Map.FH10
    Special Publication No. 114 MONTANA BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY Stickney et al. 2000 A Department of Montana Tech of The University of Montana Table 1. Names and parameters of Quaternary faults in western Montana. Fault Fault name Most recent Slip rate End-to-end Strike Fault type, Introduction quality for epicentral locations of pre-1995 earthquakes in northwest no. earthquake (mm/yr) length (km) (average) down direction The year 1999 marked the fortieth anniversary of the last destructive Montana is generally below that for southwest Montana. For the Montana earthquake. In contrast, the previous 40 years (19201960) same reason, many small northwest Montana earthquakes went 606 Deadman fault* <1.6 Ma <0.2 (?) 70.8 306° Normal, SW 614 Unnamed fault near Monida* <1.6 Ma <0.2 (?) 13.7 302° Normal, SW saw the occurrence of four major earthquake sequences in Montana. undetected prior to 1995. 641 Red Rock fault -------- ------ 40.7 326° Normal, NE Considering the state's history of damaging earthquakes, it is natural 641a Unnamed (north) section <1.6 Ma <0.2 (?) 14.4 337° Normal, NE that one may ponder the causes and sources of these earthquakes. The quality of seismic monitoring in northwest Montana improved 641b Timber Butte section <130 ka <0.2 (?) 9.3 327° Normal, NE In western Montana and throughout the Intermountain West, only dramatically in 1995 when the MBMG entered into a cooperative 641c Sheep Creeks section <15 ka 0.2-1.0 (?) 14.8 316° Normal, NE the very largest historic earthquakes can be ascribed to specific agreement with the Confederated Kootenai and Salish Tribes 642 Emigrant fault -------- ------ 52.0 41° Normal, NW 642a Unnamed (north) section <130 ka 0.2-1.0 (?) 12.9 21° Normal, W faults with certainty.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Brief Geologic History of the Flathead Subbasin
    Appendix 4 Brief Geologic History of the Flathead Subbasin The Precambrian rocks of the Belt Supergroup that underlie the Flathead Subbasin formed from sediments deposited in and near a large but shallow sea or inland lake during the middle Proterozoic (from roughly 1,600 to 800 million years ago). This large body of water, which may have been similar to today’s Caspian Sea, occupied parts of present-day eastern Washington, the panhandle of Idaho, western Montana, and adjacent areas of Canada. Over a period of 800 million years, more than 18,000 feet of sediment accumulated from surrounding highlands. The ever-increasing load depressed the sea floor, and variations in the downwarping, combined with changes in the amount and type of sediment flowing into the basin, resulted in alternate layers of different kinds of sediment, including sand, silt, and limey mud. As the great mass of sediment accumulated, moderate heat and pressure associated with deep burial caused mild metamorphism, converting the rocks to quartzite, siltite, argillite, recrystallized limestone, and dolomite. The rocks, however, retained much of their sedimentary character; features such as ripple marks, mud cracks, salt casts, and fossil algal stromatolites are well preserved. In some areas, igneous rocks were injected into the sedimentary rocks and formed sills that today parallel the layering in the rocks. Approximately 150 million years ago the North American plate began colliding with numerous large island arcs in the Pacific. The impacts created and elevated mountain chains, forming the ancestral Rocky Mountains. Immense compressive forces persisted for some 90 million years and were enough to produce mountains several hundred miles inland from the edge of the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mission Mountains Tribal Wilderness
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1995 A Confluence of sovereignty and conformity : the Mission Mountains Tribal Wilderness Diane L. Krahe The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Krahe, Diane L., "A Confluence of sovereignty and conformity : the Mission Mountains Tribal Wilderness" (1995). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8956. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8956 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CONFLUENCE OF SOVEREIGNTY AND CONFORMITY: THE MISSION MOUNTAINS TRIBAL WILDERNESS by Diane L Krahe BA Bridgewater College, 1986 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science The University of Montana 1995 Approved by; Chairperson Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP39757 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT OiSiMflAtion Pubiishrig UMI EP39757 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary and Late Tertiary of Montana: Climate, Glaciation, Stratigraphy, and Vertebrate Fossils
    QUATERNARY AND LATE TERTIARY OF MONTANA: CLIMATE, GLACIATION, STRATIGRAPHY, AND VERTEBRATE FOSSILS Larry N. Smith,1 Christopher L. Hill,2 and Jon Reiten3 1Department of Geological Engineering, Montana Tech, Butte, Montana 2Department of Geosciences and Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Idaho 3Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Billings, Montana 1. INTRODUCTION by incision on timescales of <10 ka to ~2 Ma. Much of the response can be associated with Quaternary cli- The landscape of Montana displays the Quaternary mate changes, whereas tectonic tilting and uplift may record of multiple glaciations in the mountainous areas, be locally signifi cant. incursion of two continental ice sheets from the north and northeast, and stream incision in both the glaciated The landscape of Montana is a result of mountain and unglaciated terrain. Both mountain and continental and continental glaciation, fl uvial incision and sta- glaciers covered about one-third of the State during the bility, and hillslope retreat. The Quaternary geologic last glaciation, between about 21 ka* and 14 ka. Ages of history, deposits, and landforms of Montana were glacial advances into the State during the last glaciation dominated by glaciation in the mountains of western are sparse, but suggest that the continental glacier in and central Montana and across the northern part of the eastern part of the State may have advanced earlier the central and eastern Plains (fi gs. 1, 2). Fundamental and retreated later than in western Montana.* The pre- to the landscape were the valley glaciers and ice caps last glacial Quaternary stratigraphy of the intermontane in the western mountains and Yellowstone, and the valleys is less well known.
    [Show full text]
  • GW Atlas Book.Book
    Montana Ground-Water Assessment Atlas 2 Ground-Water Resources of the Flathead Lake Area: Flathead, Lake, Missoula, and Sanders Counties, Montana Part A*—Descriptive Overview and Water-Quality Data by John I. LaFave Larry N. Smith Thomas W. Patton *The atlas is published in two parts: Part A contains a descriptive overview of the study area, along with water-quality data and an illustrated glossary to introduce and explain many specialized terms used in the text; Part B contains the 11 maps referenced in this document. The maps offer expanded discussions about many aspects of the hydrogeology of the Flathead Lake area. Parts A and B are published separately and each map in Part B is also available individually. iv Ground-Water Assessment Atlas 2 Front Cover: Flathead Lake and the valley to the north are featured in this north–northeast-looking, low-oblique photograph. Formed by glacial damming of the Flathead River during the last ice age, Flathead Lake is 30 miles long and 12 to 14 miles wide. The small city of Kalispell is barely discernible north–northwest of the lake. Kal- ispell is a center for tourism, trade, and the production of livestock, grain, fruit, timber, and aluminum. The Flathead River drains into Flathead Lake, forming a conspicuous delta in the northeast part of the lake. South- west of Kalispell are the small Foy Lakes; Whitefish Lake is to the north. Near the top center of the photograph are Glacier National Park and Lake McDonald. Image courtesy of Earth Science and Image Analysis Laboratory, NASA Johnson Space Center (http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov).
    [Show full text]
  • Kootenai Lodge Kootenai Lodge
    ALL 2004 F COMPLIMENTARY FLATFLATHHEADEAD NORTHWEST MONTANA...THE LAST BEST PLACE LIVING ̄ The history and romance of... Kootenai Lodge KALISPELL • WHITEFISH • BIGFORK • LAKESIDE • POLSON • COLUMBIA FALLS • GLACIER KOOTENAI LODGE The magical Kootenai Lodge is reflected in a tranquil Swan Lake. A STORYBOOK PLACE Photos and text by Kay Bjork ou arrive at Kootenai Lodge and peer curiously through an iron gate adorned with graceful swan silhouettes. The Y drive meanders down into the luscious green estate where towering pines stand like sentinels over the log buildings that line the shores of a glittery Swan Lake. FLATHEAD LIVING Fall 2004 www.flatheadliving.com 79 At the main lodge you enter another gate– KOOTENAI LODGE this one small and inviting, like one you would expect in a secret garden. You im- mediately feel safe and quieted in the court- yard that leads to the grand main lodge. Whimsical etchings created by Charlie Russell in a bygone era are lit up by bright afternoon sun – salamander, turtle and a noble Indian headdress. You are tempted to take off your shoes so that you can feel the curve and dip of the salamander and the warm cement on your feet. You swing the heavy double door open and the latch clinks with the thud of the door behind you. Twirling to take in the im- mense room, warmed by the red-hued larch logs and accented by the soft grey of un- peeled cedar, you imagine the delicious sound of music and laughter in this party place. You turn in a circle, slowly now, to take in the scope of this huge room: the walk- in fireplace, antique wicker furniture, a dozen animal mounts, and a Steinway grand piano.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources of the Mission Mountains Primitive Area, Missoula and Lake Counties, Montana
    Mineral Resources of the Mission Mountains Primitive Area, Missoula and Lake Counties, Montana By JACK E. HARRISON, MITCHELL W. REYNOLDS, and M. DEAN KLEINKOPF, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, and ELDON C. PATTEE, U.S. BUREAU OF MINES STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1261-D An evaluation of the mineral potential of the area UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS PRIMITIVE AREAS Pursuant to the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, Sept. 3,1964) and the Conference Report on Senate Bill 4, 88th Congress, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines are making mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilder­ ness," "wild," and "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System. Areas classed as "primitive" were not included in the Wilderness System, but the act provided that each primitive area should be studied for its suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. This bulletin reports the results of a mineral survey in the Mission Mountains Primitive Area, Montana. The area discussed in the report corresponds to the area under con­ sideration for wilderness status. This bulletin is one of a series of similar reports on primitive areas. CONTENTS Page Summary _________________________________________________________ Dl t Geology and mineral resources, by Jack E.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Population Trumpeter Swan Focal Species Action Plan
    Rocky Mountain Population Trumpeter Swan Focal Species Action Plan Dave Olson, Plan Coordinator U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mountain/Prairie Regional Office Migratory Birds and State Programs Denver, Colorado 80225 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary……………………………………………………… 3 II. Introduction……………………………………………………………… 5 III. Description of Target Species……………………………………………10 A. Range and Distribution………………………………………………12 B. Spatial Extent of Action Plan………………………………………...21 IV. Population Status………………………………………………………...22 A. Legal or Priority status…………………………………………….…22 B. Known or suspected limiting factors……….………………………..23 V. Population Objectives…………………………………………………….26 VI. Information Needs………………………………………………………..27 A. Adequacy of existing monitoring programs…………………..….…27 VII. Priority action items………………………………………………………27 VIII. Literature cited……………………………………………………………34 IX. Appendices………………………………………………………………...37 2 I. Executive Summary Trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator) are native only to North America. Although no historical estimates of their abundance are available, by 1900 they had been eliminated from most of their historical range in the U.S. and Canada. Through habitat conservation, protection from illegal shooting, supplemental winter feeding, and re-introduction and translocation efforts, trumpeter swans increased from a few hundred birds to nearly 35,000 by 2005 (Moser 2006). To facilitate monitoring and management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS) designated 3 populations: the Pacific Coast (PCP), the Rocky Mountain (RMP), and Interior (IP). The Rocky Mountain Population (RMP) increased from less than 200 in the early 1930s to 5,712 in February 2011 (USFWS 2011). Even though distribution patterns have changed since the late 1980s, about 40% of the population (n = 2,294/5,789 in winter 2011) continues to winter in the core Tri-state Area of southeast Idaho, southwest Montana, and northwest Wyoming.
    [Show full text]
  • Three-Dimensional Hydrostratigraphic Model of the Subsurface Geology, Flathead Valley, Kalispell, Montana
    May 2018 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 703 THREE-DIMENSIONAL HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC MODEL OF THE SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY, FLATHEAD VALLEY, KALISPELL, MONTANA James Rose Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Ground Water Investigations Program Cover image: Aerial view of the Flathead Valley looking northeast. Photo by Chris Saulit. THREE-DIMENSIONAL HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC MODEL OF THE SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY, FLATHEAD VALLEY, KALISPELL, MONTANA May 2018 James Rose Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Ground Water Investigation Program Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 703 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 703 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Project Background ........................................................................................................................................3 Purpose and Scope .........................................................................................................................................3 Project Location .............................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain Population of Trumpeter Swans
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln US Fish & Wildlife Publications US Fish & Wildlife Service March 2016 Rocky Mountain Population of Trumpeter Swans Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usfwspubs "Rocky Mountain Population of Trumpeter Swans" (2016). US Fish & Wildlife Publications. 514. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usfwspubs/514 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Fish & Wildlife Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in US Fish & Wildlife Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. This management plan is one of a series of cooperatively developed plans for managing various species of migratory birds of the Pacific Flyway. Inquiries about this plan may be directed to member states of the Pacific Flyway Council or to the Pacific Flyway Representative, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/DMBM, 911 N.E. 11th Avenue, Portland OR 97232-4181. Information regarding the Pacific Flyway Council and management plans can be found on the Internet at http://pacificflyway.gov/ Suggested Citation: Subcommittee on Rocky Mountain Trumpeter Swans, 2012. Pacific Flyway management plan for the Rocky Mountain Population of Trumpeter Swans, Pacific Flyway Study Committee, [c/o USFWS, DMBM], Portland, Oregon. Unpublished report. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Although this plan was prepared by the Pacific Flyway Subcommittee for the Rocky Mountain Population of Trumpeter Swans, it received considerable input and assistance from many state, federal, and tribal agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and individuals. Agencies that provided input include the state fish and wildlife agencies of Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming, the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Wildlife Science Section of the British Columbia Ministry of Environment, the U.S.
    [Show full text]