DOCSLIB.ORG

Sculpture from India Michael D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sculpture from India Michael D Chapter 12 Sculpture from India Michael D. Willis he Indian collections at the British Museum are unmatched for their quality, T historical importance and iconographic variety. 1 No other museum can boast such a we~th of material or provide such a comprehensive picture of ancient fndian civilisation. That the collections have this importance is due solely to Augustus Wol­ laston Franks. Before his appointment the Museum had only a few sculptures and there was little interest in expanding the corpus; by the time he retired the Indian collections were unsurpassed, a position they still hold after one hundred years. This was no small achievement. Early days The importance ofFran.ks's contribution is highlighted by a review of how the Indian collections developed before his arrival in 1851. The fust Indian piece to come to the Museum was an alabaster Shiva linga (OA 1786.3- 31, 1), presented by Charles Bathurst in 1786. According to a nineteenth-century record slip in the Department of Oriental Antiquities, the linga was sent to Bathurst by Thomas North after it had been obtained during Shuja ud-Daula'swaragainstthe Rohillas. The linga is decorated on the base with gilt floral designs and small painted figures of devotees. T hese are in the late Mughal style of the eighteenth century and indicate that the piece was contemporary when it entered the Museum. To all appearances this might seem an auspicious and encouraging start. Franks continued to acquire contemporary things and the Museum still pursues such a policy today. Efforts faltered, however, in the first half of the nineteenth century. Indian objects arrived coincidentally with other collections, or were sought after as simple curiosities. For ex.unple, an eleventh-century reliefshowing an orgiastic scene (OA 1805. 7-2, 264) came with the Townley Collection in 1805.2 Although this seems to have been the first piece of medieval Indian sculpture to have arrived in England, it has drawn little attention and does not appear to have been put on public display during its almostt\vo hundred years at the British Museum. SC:U Lt"rUR£ FROM INDIA 251 As for curiosities, che most singular object is a large jade tortoise (OA 1830.6-12,1). given in 1830 and for many years kept in the Department of Mineralogy.3 This is often assigned to the time of the Mughal emperor Akbar (died AD 1605), but recent investigations suggest that a date in the eighteenth century is more plausible:* In Indian temples a carved tortoise was sometimes placed below the ceremonial bell between the main Shiva linga and rhe Nan di image; tortoises also served as totems of the Jaipur Rajputs, princes who were occasionally posted to Allahabad where the Museum's jade was found. In the same year thar the tortoise was acquired, Sir Robert Brownrigg donated the celebrated Tara ( OA 1830.6- 12, 4 ), now recob>nised as the most spectacular example of early metal casting from Sri Lanka. Officers in the Royal Navy or East India Company were important sources of Asian antiquities in the early part of the nineteenth century. Captain Frederick Mar­ ryat (1792- 1848), best remembered for his children's books, gave the Museum al arge lacquer Buddha (OA 1826.2-11, 1) and a colossal stone carving of the Buddha's foot­ print (OA 1826.2-11, 2). These arri ved in 1826.5 Quite often, however, East India Company officers were disappointed by the Trustees' failure to sanction purchases.6 This prompted Edward Hawkins (Keeper of the Department ofAntiquities, 1826- 60) to comment that be would be very glad to see more Indian sculpture within the walls of the Museum and that 'it is something of a disgrace to have so few memorials of our Indian empire' .7 These concerns led, it seems, to a modest cnckle of gifts, perhaps the most important being a bracket-figure from Sanchi given by a Mrs Tucker (OA 1842.12- 10, 1 ). The carving, dating to about the mid-first century Ar:>, represents a female demi-god and fertility figure. It was originally set between the architraves of one of the Sanchi gateways. Shortly after Franks arrived at the M useum, AF. Bellasis gave a collection of archaeological material which he had excavated in Sind (1857) (OA 1857.11-18, 1-299) and W.C. Raffles Flint gave his outstanding collection of Indonesian sculpture in stone and bronze (1859) (OA 1859.12- 28, 1- 160). The foregoing synopsis covers everything of note and demonstrates that when Franks was first appointed the lndian collection was desultory at best. Conditions, however, were beginning to change. Asia's importance was being increasingly appre­ ciated as a wide range ofpe ople gained some practical experience ofthe wider world. As early as 1826 the German scholar Millingen was surprised to find that there was con­ siderable 'disregard in this country for Archaeological pursuits', by which he meant the Classical antiquities of Greece and Rome.a The Romantic movement, and particularly its English manifestations in Ruskin, were fostering a new way oflooking at the world and the arts. Those influenced by these ideas had little patience with the intellectual clarity of C lassicism. Interest now probed the potent and mysterious forces of nature or focused on exotic cultures, ancient and distant. Franks was, in this sense, a man of his time. H e was fascinated with prehistoric, Anglo-Saxon and medieval antiquities, juSt the kind of material the o lder generation felt had no place m the Museum. The conservative position is perhaps besc represented by Antonio Paniui. A leading figure in the history of the British M useum, Panizzi had joined the service of the "frustees in 1836 and became Principal Librarian in 1856. A towering personality by any measure, 252 M I C H A E L D. W ll L I S Panizzi was used to having things his way. Although it may be coincidental, the Indian sculpture collections did not grow until after Panizzi's retirement in 1866. Panizzi did have an interest in oriental manuscripts and Asian natural history (as we shall see below) but it was not until after his time that Franks was presented with a succession of opportunities which made the British Museum che world's leading repository of Indian material culture. The Bridge Collection and Charles 'Hindoo' Stuart The firsr large body of Indian sculpture which Franks brought to the Museum came from the Bridge fami ly. This collection was put together in India by Charles Smart, one of the most remarkable figures in early British India.9 A brief account of Stuart's life gives some idea of tbe circumstances which inspired his interest in fndian civilisation and prompted him to assemble this collection. Stuart sailed for Bengal in 1777 at the age of nineteen, a cadet in the East India Company Army. He rose steadily over twenty-seven years of service and retired a Major-General. At the height ofhi s career he was earning nearly two thousand pounds, a generous annual sum in the early nineteenth century and one which would have allowed him co indulge his antiquarian interests. H e had no direct connection with die oriemalist scholars of his day, but was a keen student oflndian life and rraditions. Like many ofhis generation, Stuart came to India a young man, free ofprejud ice and bigotry. He seems to have learnt Indian languages and settled down with a local woman. In his writing he consistently championed all cllings Indian and Hindu. Although Stuart had no doubt that British rule was best for India, he vigorously opposed missionary activity and attacked the notion that the West was morally superior. As a result he was widely known, even in his own time, as 'Hindoo' Stuart. He managed to avoid significant military engagements and over a long career took advantage ofhi s postings to assemble a large and comprehensive collection ofsculpture. This was a remarkable achievement given that most of his contemporaries regarded lndian art as nothing but a heathen curiosity. Stuart was the first European with serious interests in the sculpture oflndia; he was certainly the only European to appreciate its beauty. The make-up of Stuart's holdings shows that he wanted examples of each deity as a kind ofvis ual encyclopaedia of religion and custom. Stuart was considerably ahead of his time, for just as he recognised that standards of beauty are relative, so he acknowledged chat Hinduism had a religious pedigree as noble and ancient as anything the West could offer. Certainly, Stuart was one of the few people who had an understanding of Indian iconography, though he docs not seem to have published anything on the subject. 10 During bis last years Stuart lived in Wood Street, Chowringhee, Calcutta, where he maintained a 'musewn' at his house. In addition to hundreds ofs tatues, the library contained several thousand volumes and was supplemented by prints and many objects relating to the namra1 history of South and East Asia. There were also examples ofweaponry and indigenous costume. Stuart would often show visitors aroun d the premises and in his absence the servants were instructed how to conduct people through the displays. SCULPTURE l'ROM lNDlA 253 Stuart died on 1 April 1828, apparently while making plans to return to England. H e is buried in the South Park Street Cemetery in a curious tomb loosely modelled on an Indian shrine. 11 According to Stuart's will, the contents of his museum were to be sold to benefit his heirs. Packed in 143 cases and insured for 30,000 Rupees, this material made its way to England where it came under the hammer in June 1830.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past
    OXFORD STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHAEOLOGY Editorial Board BETTINA ARNOLD MICHAEL DIETLER STEPHEN DYSON PETER ROWLEY-CONWY HOWARD WILLIAMS OXFORD STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF ARCHAEOLOGY consists of scholarly works focusing on the history of archaeology throughout the world. The series covers the development of prehistoric, classical, colonial, and early historic archaeologies up to the present day. The studies, although researched at the highest level, are written in an accessible style and will interest a broad readership. A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past MARGARITA DI´ AZ-ANDREU 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox26dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Margarita Dı´az-Andreu 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Information
    BRITISH MUSEUM Caroline Tully School of Historical and Philosophical Studies University of Melbourne Melbourne, Victoria Australia [email protected] Basic Information Situated in Great Russell Street, London, the British Museum (http://www.britishmuseum.org/) was created by an Act of Parliament in 1753 and opened to the public in 1759. Governed by a board of 25 trustees in accordance with the British Museum Act of 1963 and the Museums and Galleries Act of 1992, the museum is a non-departmental public body, sponsored by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. The museum’s stated purpose is “to hold for the benefit and education of humanity a collection representative of world cultures and to ensure that the collection is housed in safety, conserved, curated, researched and exhibited” (British Museum n.d.). The British Museum originated with the collection belonging to physician and naturalist, Sir Hans Sloane (1660–1753), which consisted of natural history specimens, ethnographic material, antiquities, jewellery, coins, medals, prints, and orientalia. This was combined with a large library of manuscripts assembled by Sir Robert Cotton, and the Harleian Library, the manuscript collection of the earls of Oxford. Expanded in 1757 with the addition of King George II’s donation of the old Royal Library, the museum thus originally mainly consisted of natural history specimens, books and manuscripts. In 1772 the museum acquired its first collection of notable antiquities with the Greek vases belonging to Sir William Hamilton. In 1807 it created a specific Department of Antiquities which, in 1860, was divided into three: Greek and Roman Antiquities; Oriental Antiquities; and Coins and Medals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation of Objects Into Artifacts
    THE TRANSFORMATION OF OBJECTS INTO ARTIFACTS, ANTIQUITIES, AND ART IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY INDIA HIS CHAPTER explores how things are fabricated and how they are transformed into objects that have value and meaning. The context is T India and Great Britain in the nineteenth century. An object, be it a fired piece of clay, a bone, paper with colors applied to it, a lump of metal shaped into a sharp point, a shiny stone which is polished, a feather, everything that we think of as existing in nature, can be transformed through human labor into a product which has a meaning, use, and value. A pot shard dug up and placed in a museum with a label identifying and dating it becomes a specimen along with thousands of others, which establish, for the archaeologist, a history. A bone found in a particular geological formation becomes a fossil for a palaentologist to read as part of an evolutionary sequence. For someone else this bone ground up becomes an aphrodisiac. The paper covered by paint is a god; in another time and place, it is a work of art. A piece of cloth fabricated for presentation marking the alliance between two families through a marriage becomes a bedspread. A piece of metal shaped and sharpened and used as a weapon by a great warrior becomes for his descendants an emblem of his power, and is carefully stored away in an armory, to be brought out in times of trouble to rally a failing army. In the hands of his enemies, it becomes a trophy.
    [Show full text]
  • At the British Museum
    Evaluating the China and South Asia Gallery (Room 33) at the British Museum by Jack Duffy-Protentis Yufei Gao Yuanda Song Amanda Toledo Barrios Evaluating the China and South Asia Gallery (Room 33) at the British Museum An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science by Jack Duffy-Protentis Yufei Gao Yuanda Song Amanda Toledo Barrios Date: 21 June 2018 Report Submitted to: Stuart Frost The British Museum Professors James Hanlan and Gbetonmasse Somasse Worcester Polytechnic Institute This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. ii Abstract The goal of this project was to evaluate visitors in the revitalized China and South Asia gallery at the British Museum. To achieve this goal, we determined best practices in museum evaluation, identified the British Museum’s goals and protocols, and evaluated visitor behavior. Through tracking and surveying visitors, we found that: the most visited bays were Qing, Late Ming, and Early Ming, the most popular object was the Tomb Procession, 64% of the visitors began with the right side of the gallery, and the average dwell time was 18 minutes. To further improve the gallery, our recommendations were to add more audio descriptions, to clarify how the museum gained possession of objects, and to incorporate QR codes on object labels to provide more information in multiple languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Accounts 2016–2017
    The British Museum REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2017 HC 68 The British Museum REPORT AND ACCOUNTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2017 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 9(8) of the Museums and Galleries Act 1992 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed on 13 July 2017 HC 68 The British Museum Account 2016-2017 © The British Museum copyright 2017 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as British Museum copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications Print ISBN 9781474144254 Web ISBN 9781474144261 ID 21041708 60062 07/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office The British Museum Account 2016-2017 Contents Trustees’ and Accounting Officer’s Annual Report 3 Chairman’s Foreword 3 Structure, governance and management 4 Constitution and operating environment 4 Subsidiaries 4 Friends’ organisations 4 Strategic direction and performance against objectives 4 Collections and research
    [Show full text]
  • Section on Art Libraries; Section on Geography and Map Libraries; Section on Government Libraries; Section on Science and Technology Libraries
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 356 789 IR 05b. 480 TITLE IFLA General Conference, 1992. Division of Special Libraries: Section on Art Libraries; Section on Geography and Map Libraries; Section on Government Libraries; Section on Science and Technology Libraries. Papers. INSTITUTION International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, London (England). PUB DATE Sep 92 NOTE 278p.; Papers presented at the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) General Conference (58th, New Delhi, India, August 30-September 3, 1992). Reproducibility of papers it poor. For additional conference papers, see IR 054 468-483. PUB TYPE Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PC12 Postage. DESCRIPTORS Access to Information; *Art; Developing Nations; Documentation; Foreign Countries; Geography; Government (Administrative Body); Law Libraries; *Library Collection Development; *Maps; National Libraries; *Scientific and Technical Information; *Special Libraries; Users (Information) IDENTIFIERS Afghanistan; Asia (Southeast); England; India; Indochina; Indonesia; International Federation of Library Associations; Manuscript Collections; Mexico; Netherlands; Philippines; Russia; UNESCO ABSTRACT The following 21 papers were delivered for the Special Libraries Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions at its 1992 annual meeting: (1) "From Indochina to Afghanistan: Arts from Abroad in Parisian Libraries" (M. F. Macouin);(2) "The Indonesian Archeology Photograph an' Documentation System (IAPDS) in Leiden" (H.I. R. Hinzler);(3) "The Collection Development and Organisation of Art Materials: The Cultural Center of the Philippines in Context" (E. R. Peralejo);(4) "Resources for the Conservation of Southeast Asian Art" (S. G. Swa.itzburg);(5) "The Moravian Mission and Its Research on the Language and Culture of Western Tibet: A Case Study for Collection Development" (H.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INDIAN IVORY CARVING from BEGRAM B Y MARILYN LEESE A
    AN INDIAN IVORY CARVING FROM BEGRAM by MARILYN LEESE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts in the Department of Fine Arts We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September, 1969* In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree tha permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Fine Arts The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date September 15, 1969* i ABSTRACT In 1939, a rich archaeological find was made in Afghani• stan when a hoard of luxury objects was excavated in a "palatial residence" at Begram, site of ancient Kapisa. Among the precious articles brought to light were hundreds of Indian ivory carvings which at one time decorated royal furnishings belonging to Kushan kings. Kapisa was once the summer capitol of opulent and powerful rulers who controlled a land extending from the Ganges River into Central Asia. Created by former nomads whose ruling princes gave themselves the dynastic name of Kushan, the Indo- Scythian Empire straddled the routes to Rome, Iran and China and was virtually the centre of the world in the first centu• ries of our era.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    1 Introduction The English word “museum” comes from the Latin word, and is pluralized as “museums” (or rarely, “musea”). It is originally from the Ancient Greek (Mouseion), which denotes a place or temple dedicated to the Muses (the patron divinities in Greek mythology of the arts), and hence a building set apart for study and the arts, especially the Musaeum (institute) for philosophy and research atAlexandria by Ptolemy I Soter about 280 BCE. The first museum/library is considered to be the one of Plato in Athens. However, Pausanias gives another place called “Museum,” namely a small hill in Classical Athens opposite the Akropolis. The hill was called Mouseion after Mousaious, a man who used to sing on the hill and died there of old age and was subsequently buried there as well. The Louvre in Paris France. 2 Museum The Uffizi Gallery, the most visited museum in Italy and an important museum in the world. Viw toward thePalazzo Vecchio, in Florence. An example of a very small museum: A maritime museum located in the village of Bolungarvík, Vestfirðir, Iceland showing a 19th-century fishing base: typical boat of the period and associated industrial buildings. A museum is an institution that cares for (conserves) a collection of artifacts and other objects of artistic,cultural, historical, or scientific importance and some public museums makes them available for public viewing through exhibits that may be permanent or temporary. The State Historical Museum inMoscow. Introduction 3 Most large museums are located in major cities throughout the world and more local ones exist in smaller cities, towns and even the countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Aachen, Germany, 336 Agkor, 328 Amanat Khan, 524 Aalto, Aino, 743 Agora, Athens, Greece, 129 Amaravati Stupa, India, 185, 222 Aalto, Alvar, 726, 727, 742–743, 749 Agra, India, 524 Amazon societies, 50, 51, 234 Abbasids, 307 agriculture, 6–8, 10–12, 16, 50, 51, 90, 94, 96 Amber Fort, Amer, India, 611 Abbasid Caliphate, 314, 316 3500–2500 BCE, 1–3 Amenhotep III (pharaoh of Egypt), 65, 107 abbeys, 351 2500–1500 BCE, 25–27 Amer, India, 597 abbey churches, 336 1500–800 BCE, 57 Americas Abbey Church of Cluny, France, 398 800–400 BCE, 87 2500–1500 BCE, 26 Abbey Church of St. Foy, Conques, France, 398 200–400 CE, 198 200–400 CE, 199 Abbey Fécamp, France, 399 600–800 CE, 271, 275 1000–1200 CE, 356 Abbey of Church of St. Riquier, France, 238, 336, 800–1000 CE, 305, 308, 309 1400–1600 CE, 455 397 1000–1200 CE, 347–349 1600–1700 CE, 501 Abbey of Sant’Antimo, Sienna, 351 1200–1400 CE, 407–409 1700–1800 CE, 563, 568 Abbey of SS. Ulrich and Afra, Neresheim, 1400–1600 CE, 457 1900–1950 CE, 657 Germany, 583 1700–1800 CE, 563 colonialism, 568 Abbey of Vézelay, France, 645 1800–1900 CE, 607 slavery, 569 Abd al-Malik (caliph of Jerusalem), 318 haciendas, 568, 571 trade, 90 Abd al-Rahman I (caliph), 316, 317 plantations, 568, 569, 606 urbanization, 90, 338, 356 Abhayagiri Vihara, 188 agropastoralism, 3, 6, 11, 12, 26, 219, 409 American Craftsman Style, 684 Abiff, Chiram, 107 Aha’s tomb at Umm el-Qaab, Abydos, Egypt, 19 American Institute of Architects (AIA), 688 Abrams, Charles, 761 Ahmedabad, India, 488, 778–779 American Revolution, 626 Absalom, Tomb
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Between Sri Lanka and South India
    0 Interactions between Sri Lanka and South India in the Early and Middle Historic through the perspective of personal adornment Volume 1 of 2 Submitted by Kaushalya Gangadari Gunasena to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology In June 2018 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………… 1 ABSTRACT The present research investigates the interaction between Sri Lanka and its closest neighbouring region, South India, during the Early and Middle Historic periods. This connection has often been studied based on the textual evidence available on either side with little regard for the material evidence. Therefore, previous studies have fallen short of providing an objective understanding of the interactions. Furthermore, the focus of previous studies has been large-scale, state-mandated interaction. In contrast, this study has adopted a novel approach through the perspective of personal adornment and has been able to trace far closer contact between the two regions than official interaction suggests. To understand interpersonal interactions between the two regions, objects of personal adornment from seven different sites in Sri Lanka and South India were analysed. The patterns that emerge from assemblages of objects of adornment, including beads and other non-bead adornments were observed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Factors Behind the Architectural Change and Dramatic Design Plans
    International Journal of Research in Tourism and Hospitality (IJRTH) Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2015, PP 36-50 www.arcjournals.org A Short Retrospective Study upon 19th Century of British Museum: In Particular Smirke Brothers’ Period to Asses the Architectural Change and the Relation with Artifacts Soner AKIN Dr, Teaching Assistant, Mustafa Kemal University, Kırıkhan Vocational School, TURKEY Abstract: In this study, a story of British museum will be evaluated in particular famous architects of the term between the years 1820s to 1870s as Robert Smirke and his brother Sydney Smirke. Accordinly the architectural change and their impression in printed media of 19th century will be discussed and in public view based framework, museum position will be discussed. The method used in this article was firstly shaped with in a story teller manner first via looking at the historical background of the term. Then in the central part the Smirkes Period was involved into this sequential outlook. Indeed, the printed media of this term was searched secondly, in order to assess the impression of this changes and the factors behind the changes as events in this period. After this manner, thirdly the famous artifacts of today’s museum collection were paid attention benefiting from contemporary resources, then benefiting from inventory research facilities the acquisition of those artifacts belonging to 19th century were clarified. This was a minor study to bridge a linkage between today’s outlook and the historical outlook of the term. It was wondered that whether the popular position of artifact in the century was also effective on architectural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhist Remains in Andhra and the History of Andhra Between 225
    GOVERNMENT OP INDIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA CENTRAL ARCHEOLOGICAL LIBRARY ACCESSION NO. CALL No.S3^,.ai6/S.Lib Buddkist Remains in AndKra AND The History of Andhra between 225 & 610 A.D. BY K. R. SUBRAMANIAN, M.A. Lecturer in llisLor}', MaliaiTijn’s College, Vizianagrani, SankarapfirvaUii prizeman for Research in Ancicnl Indian History 11127 (Madras University), Giinhir District Hoard Fellow, lt)27-2,S (Andhra University) Author of TV/c? Origin of ^aivisni and Us , Ifislory in ihe faviil land, 'flic Maratha /va/as of Tanjorc, etc., etc. 3 jMAPvS AND 6 PLATES. WITH A FOREWORD n? - Dr. G. JOUVEAU-DUBREUIL Author of The Pallavas, Pallava Antiquities, Ancient History of the Deccan, etc,, etc. -v |D.^’|3b 0' - ( ? 1 j I i e4A'*^ <• DEDICATED TO M. R, RV. C. R. REDDI GARU, M.A. (CANTAB) THE FIRST VICE-CHANCELLOR OF THE ANDHRA UNIVERSITY, AS A TOKEN OF THE AUTHOR’S HIGH REGARD FOR HIS GREAT INTELLECTUAL CAPACITIES AND BROAD CULTURAL OUTLOOK. J i c LIBRARY, NEW DbiYU Aoo. f Y?-. ! Date...?--^- i ^77 , \ CaUNo..., ; — — FOREWORD The work of Mr. Subramanian will give the reader very complete details concerning 1. Archaeology of the Andhra country. 2. Its history during the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth centuries. I think that as Preface for this hook it would be well that I fix 1. in space (on the map) the archeological remains, 2. in time (chronology) the historical facts. Section 1. Geographical position of Archmological remahis in Andhra, , In examining the map opposite, one will find the Buddhist sites placed along certain lines.
    [Show full text]