Discussion of Ophiolites in Northeast and East Africa: Implications for Proterozoic Crustal Growth Journal, Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 148, 1991, pp. 600-606, 2 figs. Printed in Northern Ireland Discussion of ophiolites in Northeast and East Africa: implications for Proterozoic crustal growth Journal, Vol. 147, 1990, pp. 41-57 W. R. Church writes: In discussing the Pan-African geology theeastern margin of theEastern Desert. They do not of Northeast andEast Africa, Berhe (1990) affirms that necessarily cross into Saudi Arabia. On the Saudi Arabian ophiolite decorated lineaments in the Arabian-Nubian side of the Red Sea, the AI Wask, and Farri Group rocks of Shield representsuture zones. The difference of opinion the supposed Yanbu suture may represent parts of a similar between Berhe (1990) and Stern et al. (1989) concerning the ophiolitic sheet exposed as a result of out-of-sequence thrust location of the supposed suture zones of northern Sudan and faulting, with the820Ma old Iqwaq granodiorite repre- southern Egypt, is a clear illustration of the ambiguity that senting a window of older arc basement. The 780 Ma old may arisethrough the uncritical use of thisparadigm. JabalEss ophiolite (Pallister et al. 1988), whichis little Whereas Berhe considers the Sol Hamed-Wadi Onib deformedand also associated with melange and pebbly ophiolite belt to represent in situ oceanic material located mudstone units, may form the uppermost unit of the nappe along a north-south trendingextension of the Saudi pile. Since the 808 Ma (Stern et al. 1989) Sol Hamid-Wadi Arabian Yanbu-Sol Hamed ‘suture’, Stern et al. (1989) link Onib ophiolites are also upthrust tothe south of the thelatter with the east-west trending Allaqi-Heiani regionally south dipping 741 Ma Gerf ophiolite, the relative ophiolite belt, which they consider to be a major east-west age and disposition of the ophiolites could be taken to imply suture ‘extending well into the interiorof North Africa. This that the ophiolitic rocks represent oceanic material formed important difference in opinion is a clear indication of the along the eastern margin of the Hijaz ocean, which would arbitrary nature of suture selectionbased solely onthe therefore now be buried somewhere beneath the ophiolitic distribution of ophiolitic rocks. Furthermore,neither nappesomewhere to the south of the Yanbu-Sol Hamid explanation may be correct. ophiolitebelt. The location of the ocean further south The distribution of ophiolitic rocks in the southern part within the Pan-African likely lies east of the ophiolite of the Eastern Desert and northern Sudan is more likely occurrence at Ingessana, since Shackleton (1988) has argued controlled by the southern Eastern Desert domal culmina- that the Ingessana ophiolite represents an erosional remnant tion, out-of-sequencefaulting, andthe development of of a large thrust sheet. The thrust sheet may have extended zones of intenseductile strain. Within the domal or slid asfar tothe west as the Nuba Hills. Problems culmination, ophiolitic material exposed at lower structural associated with the location of sutures in the Kenya section levels nearAbu Swayel, Gebel Nagy, Um Krush and of the Pan African havebeen discussed by Shackleton perhaps GebelGerf, overlie highly deformed and (1986). metamorphosed pelitic metasedimentscontaining a ‘con- Evenin the Saudi Arabian shield,where terranesare tinental’ Nd isotopesignature (Harris et al. 1984), relatively well defined on the basis of age criteria, and where quartzo-feldspathic gneisses (Umm Tundeiba), hornblende- accretion is most likely to have involved lateral transporta- cummintonite-garnetamphibolites of arcderivation, and tion of arc terranes, it is now apparent that ophiolites are compositionally laminated hornblende-garnet felsic rocks of not the best indicators of terrane boundaries or sense of unknown tectonic affiliation. To the south in Wadi Murra, terrane movement. Taken at face value, the model ages of highly strained mafic schists are succeeded by a southerly- Pallister et al. (1988) indicate thatthe ophiolites of the facing upward-coarsening siltstone-turbidite-pebbly Arabian Nabitah ‘suture’ belong to two different terranes, mudstone-melange sequence, similar in most essential one with an age of c. 850 Ma. (Asir), the other with an age respects tothat described furthernorth in the ophiolitic of c. 750 Ma. (AI Qarah).The Junaynah‘age suture’ nappe pile of the Marsa Alam region of the Eastern Desert therefore appears to transect the Nabitah ‘ophiolite suture’. (El Sharkawi & El Bayoumi 1979; Basta et al. 1986). The In neither case are the ophiolites confined to the terrane clasts of quartzite from which detrital Archean zircons were boundary. first obtained by Dixon (1981) and which have subsequently In the case of the supposed Bir Umq-Thurwah-Nakasib been found elsewhere in the central Eastern desert (Wust et ‘suture’, it is also worth noting that (1) there is clear al. 1987), were taken from pebbly mudstones of the Murra evidence of crustal contamination in the Thurwah ophiolite, melange. The relationship of the melange theto but not in the Bir Umq diorite (Pallister et al. 1988); (2) the discontinuousophiolite belt north of Wadi Allaqi is Thurwah ophiolite could be as young as 810 Ma or as old as unknown, but by analogy with theGhadir region the 870 Ma, and could therefore be 30 Ma older or younger than ophiolites could form an upper ophiolite component of the the Bir Umq diorite; (3) the Thurwah ophiolite lies north of nappe pile. Rather than being a ‘suture’, the Allaqi-Heiani the Labunah thrust, the supposed suture, whereas the Bir ophiolite belt would therefore represent a structural level Umq rocks lie south of the supposed suture; (4) rocks in the within the rim of anarched ophiolitic nappe, or evena Rabigh area to the northof the Thurwah ophiolite are as old pinched syncline separatingthe southern Eastern Desert as 945 f 45 Ma (AI-Shanti et al. 1984); and (5) all definitions culmination from a northern Sudan culmination west of the of a suture along a Bir Umq, Thurwah, Nakasib (Sudan) Hamisana shear zone. The Allaqi-Heiani-Gerf ophiolitic line have ignored the presence of serpentinites on the Sudan belt may skirt the southern Eastern Desert culmination to side of the Red Sea southwest of Mohamed Qol at 20”30’, join up with the ophiolite/melange units cropping out along 36’30‘ (Vail Map of N.E.Sudan, unpublished map 600 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article-pdf/148/3/600/4892200/gsjgs.148.3.0600.pdf by guest on 27 September 2021 DISCUSSION 601 compilation, 1978). It is therefore far from certain that the 1990) and contrasting geology is found on either side of the Thurwah ophiolite defines the boundary of the Asir terrane; sutures. the boundary could lie underthe c. 740-700 Ma old AI If the Jabal Ess ophiolite formed the uppermost unit of Ays-Furayh-Neferdeib volcano-sedimentary successor ba- the AI Wask nappe pile, then we would expect the former to sin of the Hijaz terrane. contain only a limited portion of an ophiolitesequence. At the eastern edgeof the Saudi Arabian Shield, the Abt However both the Jabal Ess (Shanti & Roobol 1979) and Schist, which contains detrital chromite, garnet, carbonate, the A1 Wask complexes display completea ophiolite muscovite and anatase, was deposited in a basin to the rear succession fromserpentinized ultramafic rocks,cumulate of the western leading edge of the obducted Urd-AI Amar and high level gabbros andan upper metavolcanic and ophiolite. It was subsequently overthrust by the Ar Rayn arc metasedimentarysequence. This suggests that theyrepre- rocks along the AI Amar ‘suture’. The main ocean basin and sent distinct complexes. closure suture therefore likely lie to the east of the Ar Rayn The suggestion that the Ingessana ophiolite could have terrane. extended as far west as the Nuba Mountains implies that the Berhe (1990) suggests that geological differences along Nuba and Ingessana ophiolites arepart of the same the length of the Pan African-Mozambique belt reflects the complex. It is true that the Ingessana complex represents an existence of a relatively narrow belt of oceanic crust, and erosional remnant of a large thrust sheet (Shackleton 1988), consequently a low degree of crustalgrowth, within the but it is unlikely that the Ingessanaophiolite could have Mozambique portion of thebelt. In contrast, Reymer & been detached and transported for over 200 km without the Schubert (1984) and Pallister et al. (1990) have argued that other mafic-ultramafic complexes in the surrounding regions thearc accretion rate of thenorthern Arabian-Nubian being affected. Besides, the Nubaophiolite (Hirdes & shield was excessively high compared to that of the present Brinkmann 1985; Steiner 1987) and the Ingessana ophiolite day.This antipathetic relationship can partin be (Abdel Rahman 1983) separate high-grade metasediments rationalized,however, if it is assumed thatthe missing from low-grade volcano-sedimentary sequence. This means southern arc terranes have migrated laterally northwards to thatthere is acontrast of geology oneither side of the form part of the Arabian-Nubian amalgamated arc system, postulatedsutures as indicated by a recent study of the in thesame way thatthe North AmericanCordilleran Nuba Mts (Abdelsalam & Dawoud 1991). system has amalgamated by lateral arc accretion. In orderto show the ambiguity of suture selection, Church discusses the Bir Umq-Thurwah-Nakasib belt as a 15 June 1990 case study. The Thurwah and Bir Umq ophiolites do show minor differences in geochemistry along strike (Nassief et al. 1984). Pallister et al. (1988) dated zircons fromgabbroic Seife M. Berbe replies: Churchraises two principal rocks of Thurwah complex and found old ages (1250Ma) objections to my recentpaper: (1) ophiolites are not the from two of the fractions. They explained this result as a best indicators of terrane boundaries or sense of terrane product of assimilation of older material during emplace- movement; (2) the Mozambiquebelt incorporates a small ment of the gabbro. Church uses these data to suggest that proportion of oceanic crust implying a low degree of crustal since the Bir Umq diorite does not show evidence of growth in the region.