DOCSLIB.ORG

HW-SW Components for Parallel Embedded Computing on Noc-Based Mpsocs Keywords

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HW-SW Components for Parallel Embedded Computing on Noc-Based Mpsocs Keywords HW-SW COMPONENTS FOR PARALLEL EMBEDDED COMPUTING ON NOC-BASED MPSOCS Ph.D. Thesis in Computer Science (Microelectronics and Electronics System Department) Author: Supervisor: Jaume Joven Murillo Prof. Jordi Carrabina Bordoll UNIVERSITAT AUTONOMA` DE BARCELONA (UAB) December 2009 Bellaterra, Spain I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Prof. Jordi Carrabina Bordoll This work was carried out at Universitat Autonoma` de Barcelona (UAB), Ecole Polytechnique Fed´ erale´ de Lausanne (EPFL), and ARM Ltd. R&D Department (Cambridge). °c 2009 Jaume Joven Murillo All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechan- ical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the copyright owner. Science is an imaginative adventure of the mind seeking truth in a world of mystery. -Sir Cyril Herman Hinshelwood (1897-1967) English chemist. Nobel prize 1956. Abstract Recently, on the on-chip and embedded domain, we are witnessing the growing of the Multi-Processor System-on-Chip (MPSoC) era. Network- on-chip (NoCs) have been proposed to be a viable, efficient, scalable, pre- dictable and flexible solution to interconnect IP blocks on a chip, or full- featured bus-based systems in order to create highly complex systems. Thus, the paradigm to high-performance embedded computing is arriving through high hardware parallelism and concurrent software stacks to achieve max- imum system platform composability and flexibility using pre-designed IP cores. These are the emerging NoC-based MPSoCs architectures. However, as the number of IP cores on a single chip increases exponentially, many new challenges arise. The first challenge is the design of a suitable hardware interconnection to provide adequate Quality of Service (QoS) ensuring certain bandwidth and latency bounds for inter-block communication, but at a minimal power and area costs. Due to the huge NoC design space, simulation and verification environments must be put in place to explore, validate and optimize many different NoC architectures. The second target, nowadays a hot topic, is to provide efficient and flex- ible parallel programming models upon new generation of highly parallel NoC-based MPSoCs. Thus, it is mandatory the use of lightweight SW li- braries which are able to exploit hardware features present on the execution platform. Using these software stacks and their associated APIs accord- ing to a specific parallel programming model will let software application designers to reuse and program parallel applications effortlessly at higher levels of abstraction. Finally, to get an efficient overall system behaviour, a key research chal- lenge is the design of suitable HW/SW interfaces. Specially, it is crucial in heterogeneous multiprocessor systems where parallel programming mod- els and middleware functions must abstract the communication resources during high level specification of software applications. ii Thus, the main goal of this dissertation is to enrich the emerging NoC- based MPSoCs by exploring and adding engineering and scientific contribu- tion to new challenges appeared in the last years. This dissertation focuses on all of the above points: • by describing an experimental environment to design NoC-based sys- tems, xENoC, and a NoC design space exploration tool named NoC- Maker. This framework leads to a rapid prototyping and validation of NoC-based MPSoCs. • by extending Network Interfaces (NIs) to handle heterogeneous traf- fic from different bus-based standards (e.g. AMBA, OCP-IP) in order to reuse and communicate a great variety off-the-shelf IP cores and software stacks in a transparent way from the user point of view. • by providing runtime QoS features (best effort and guaranteed ser- vices) through NoC-level hardware components and software middle- ware routines. • by exploring HW/SW interfaces and resource sharing when a Floating Point Unit (FPU) co-processor is interfaced on a NoC-based MPSoC. • by porting parallel programming models, such as shared memory or message passing models on NoC-based MPSoCs. We present the im- plementation of an efficient lightweight parallel programming model based on Message Passing Interface (MPI), called on-chip Message Passing Interface (ocMPI). It enables the design of parallel distributed computing at task-level or function-level using explicit parallelism and synchronization methods between the cores integrated on the chip. • by provide runtime application to packets QoS support on top of the OpenMP runtime library targeted for shared memory MPSoCs in or- der to boost or balance critical applications or threads during its exe- cution. The key challenges explored in this dissertation are formalized on HW- SW communication centric platform-based design methodology. Thus, the outcome of this work will be a robust cluster-on-chip platform for high- performance embedded computing, whereby hardware and software com- ponents can be reused at multiple levels of design abstraction. ii HW-SW Components for Parallel Embedded Computing on NoC-based MPSoCs Keywords NETWORKS-ON-CHIP (NOCS) MULTI-PROCESSOR SYSTEM-ON-CHIPS (MPSOCS) NOC-BASED MPSOCS ON-CHIP INTERCONNECT FABRIC EDA/CAD NOCDESIGN FLOW HW-SW INTERFACES CYCLE-ACCURATE SIMULATION QUALITY-OF-SERVICE (QOS) MESSAGE PASSING PARALLEL PROGRAMMING MODELS iv iv HW-SW Components for Parallel Embedded Computing on NoC-based MPSoCs Acknowledgments A large number of people have been indispensable to succeed on the real- ization of this Ph.D. thesis. First of all, I would like to thank my advisor Prof. Jordi Carrabina for their guidance and support over these years. Also, I would like to express my deeply gratitude to Prof. David Castells, Prof. Lluis Teres,´ and Dr. Fed- erico Angiolini for their assistance and technical support provided, and for listening and helping me every time I needed it doing large research discus- sions and meetings. Another special mention to Prof. Giovanni De Micheli, Prof. David Atienza and Prof. Luca Benini to open the door giving me the opportunity to do research at Ecole Polytechnique Fed´ erale´ de Lausanne (EPFL) side by side with many brilliant people (thanks to Ciprian, Srini, Antonio,...), as well as in Bologna (thanks Andrea). And I am deeply grateful to Per Strid, John Penton, and Emre Ozer to give me the chance to live an incredible working experience in a world- class enterprise like ARM Ltd. at Research & Development Department in Cambridge, as well as all researchers at ARM Ltd R&D Department (spe- cially to Derek, Akash and Antonino). A special thanks to all the people that I had the pleasure to work with in Barcelona (all colleagues of CEPHIS Lab, specially mention to Sergi and Eduard). Thought this Ph.D. I had the possibility to travel around Europe and meet very interesting people. However, special thanks to all people that I had the pleasure to meet during my Ph.D. research stays in Lausanne (Nes- tle ”Spanish mafia”, EPFL friends, ...) which help me to adapt to another country, and surely make me to live one of the best periods of my life. vi Thanks to all my friends, even though they were not very convinced if I was working, studying, or both, during the last four years, they encourage me to chase the goal to finish the Ph.D. Last but not least, I am deeply grateful to my family to support me un- conditionally, and to educate me to do always as much as I can to obtain my targets. This dissertation is dedicated to them. I cannot finish without acknowledge the institutions that supported me and my research with funding and infrastructure along these years. This Ph.D. dissertation has mainly supported by Agencia` de Gestio´ d’Ajuts Uni- versitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) and Spanish Ministry for Industry, Tourism and Trade (MITyC) through TEC2008-03835/TEC and ”ParMA: Parallel Pro- gramming for Multi-core Architectures - ITEA2 Project (No 06015, June 2007 – May 2010), as well as, the collaboration grants awarded by European Net- work of Excellence on High Performance and Embedded Architecture and Compilation (HIPEAC). Thanks to all of you... ...and now, in this ”crisis” era, lots of fellows nowadays have a B.A., M.D., M.Ph, Ph.D, but unfortunately, they don’t have a J.O.B I hope this not happen to me , and I am expecting impatiently new positive op- portunities to do what I like vi HW-SW Components for Parallel Embedded Computing on NoC-based MPSoCs Contents Abstract i Keywords iii Acknowledgments v Contents vii List of Figures xi List of Tables xv Listings xvii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background ............................. 5 1.2 NoC-based MPSoC: Opportunities and Challenges ....... 10 1.3 Contributions of This Dissertation ................ 12 1.4 Dissertation Outline ........................ 17 2 Experimental Framework for EDA/CAD of NoC-based Systems 19 2.1 Networks-on-Chip: Preliminary Concepts ............ 19 2.1.1 NoC Paradigm - General Overview ........... 20 2.1.2 Topologies .......................... 21 2.1.3 Routing Protocol and Deadlock Freedom ........ 24 2.1.4 Switching Communication Techniques ......... 26 2.1.5 Buffering and Virtual Channels .............. 28 2.1.6 Flow Control Protocols ................... 30 2.1.7 Micro-network Protocol Stack for NoCs ......... 31 2.2 Motivation and Key Challenges .................. 34 2.3 Related work on NoC Design and EDA Tools .......... 35 viii 2.4 xENoC environment - NoCMaker ................ 36 2.4.1 Design Flow of NoCMaker ................ 37 2.4.2 NoC modeling ....................... 39 2.4.3 Metrics Extraction according to Design Space Points . 42 2.4.4 Modeling Traffic Patterns and Benchmarks ....... 48 2.4.5 System and Circuit Validation ............... 50 2.5 Experiments using xENoC – NoCMaker ............. 52 2.5.1 Synthesis of Nios II NoC-based MPSoC architectures . 53 2.6 Conclusion and Future Work ..................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download the Compiled Program File Onto the Chip
    International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology (IJCSIT) Vol 4, No 2, April 2012 MPP SOCGEN: A FRAMEWORK FOR AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF MPP SOC ARCHITECTURE Emna Kallel, Yassine Aoudni, Mouna Baklouti and Mohamed Abid Electrical department, Computer Embedded System Laboratory, ENIS School, Sfax, Tunisia ABSTRACT Automatic code generation is a standard method in software engineering since it improves the code consistency and reduces the overall development time. In this context, this paper presents a design flow for automatic VHDL code generation of mppSoC (massively parallel processing System-on-Chip) configuration. Indeed, depending on the application requirements, a framework of Netbeans Platform Software Tool named MppSoCGEN was developed in order to accelerate the design process of complex mppSoC. Starting from an architecture parameters design, VHDL code will be automatically generated using parsing method. Configuration rules are proposed to have a correct and valid VHDL syntax configuration. Finally, an automatic generation of Processor Elements and network topologies models of mppSoC architecture will be done for Stratix II device family. Our framework improves its flexibility on Netbeans 5.5 version and centrino duo Core 2GHz with 22 Kbytes and 3 seconds average runtime. Experimental results for reduction algorithm validate our MppSoCGEN design flow and demonstrate the efficiency of generated architectures. KEYWORD MppSoC, Automatic code generation; mppSoC configuration;parsing ; MppSoCGEN; 1. INTRODUCTION Parallel machines are most often used in many modern applications that need regular parallel algorithms and high computing resources, such as image processing and signal processing. Massively parallel architectures, in particular Single Instruction Multiple Data (SIMD) systems, have shown to be powerful executers for data-intensive applications [1].
    [Show full text]
  • An Architecture and Compiler for Scalable On-Chip Communication
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VERY LARGE SCALE INTEGRATION (VLSI) SYSTEMS, VOL. XX, NO. Y, MONTH 2004 1 An Architecture and Compiler for Scalable On-Chip Communication Jian Liang, Student Member, IEEE, Andrew Laffely, Sriram Srinivasan, and Russell Tessier, Member, IEEE Abstract— tion of communication resources. Significant amounts of arbi- A dramatic increase in single chip capacity has led to a tration across even a small number of components can quickly revolution in on-chip integration. Design reuse and ease-of- form a performance bottleneck, especially for data-intensive, implementation have became important aspects of the design pro- cess. This paper describes a new scalable single-chip communi- stream-based computation. This issue is made more complex cation architecture for heterogeneous resources, adaptive System- by the need to compile high-level representations of applica- On-a-Chip (aSOC), and supporting software for application map- tions to SoC environments. The heterogeneous nature of cores ping. This architecture exhibits hardware simplicity and opti- in terms of clock speed, resources, and processing capability mized support for compile-time scheduled communication. To il- makes cost modeling difficult. Additionally, communication lustrate the benefits of the architecture, four high-bandwidth sig- nal processing applications including an MPEG-2 video encoder modeling for interconnection with long wires and variable arbi- and a Doppler radar processor have been mapped to a prototype tration protocols limits performance predictability required by aSOC device using our design mapping technology. Through ex- computation scheduling. perimentation it is shown that aSOC communication outperforms Our platform for on-chip interconnect, adaptive System-On- a hierarchical bus-based system-on-chip (SoC) approach by up to a-Chip (aSOC), is a modular communications architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Chip Interconnect Schemes for Reconfigurable System-On-Chip
    On-chip Interconnect Schemes for Reconfigurable System-on-Chip Andy S. Lee, Neil W. Bergmann. School of ITEE, The University of Queensland, Brisbane Australia {andy, n.bergmann} @itee.uq.edu.au ABSTRACT On-chip communication architectures can have a great influence on the speed and area of System-on-Chip designs, and this influence is expected to be even more pronounced on reconfigurable System-on-Chip (rSoC) designs. To date, little research has been conducted on the performance implications of different on-chip communication architectures for rSoC designs. This paper motivates the need for such research and analyses current and proposed interconnect technologies for rSoC design. The paper also describes work in progress on implementation of a simple serial bus and a packet-switched network, as well as a methodology for quantitatively evaluating the performance of these interconnection structures in comparison to conventional buses. Keywords: FPGAs, Reconfigurable Logic, System-on-Chip 1. INTRODUCTION System-on-chip (SoC) technology has evolved as the predominant circuit design methodology for custom ASICs. SoC technology moves design from the circuit level to the system level, concentrating on the selection of appropriate pre-designed IP Blocks, and their interconnection into a complete system. However, modern ASIC design and fabrication are expensive. Design tools may cost many hundreds of thousands of dollars, while tooling and mask costs for large SoC designs now approach $1million. For low volume applications, and especially for research and development projects in universities, reconfigurable System-on-Chip (rSoC) technology is more cost effective. Like conventional SoC design, rSoC involves the assembly of predefined IP blocks (such as processors and peripherals) and their interconnection.
    [Show full text]
  • A3MAP: Architecture-Aware Analytic Mapping for Networks-On-Chip Wooyoung Jang and David Z
    6C-2 A3MAP: Architecture-Aware Analytic Mapping for Networks-on-Chip Wooyoung Jang and David Z. Pan Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Texas at Austin [email protected], [email protected] Abstract - In this paper, we propose a novel and global A3MAP formulation, we seek to embed a task graph into the metric (Architecture-Aware Analytic Mapping) algorithm applied to space of network. Then, the quality of task mapping is NoC (Networks-on-Chip) based MPSoC (Multi-Processor measured by the total distortion of metric embedding. System-on-Chip) not only with homogeneous cores on regular Through this formulation, our A3MAP can map a task mesh architecture as done by most previous mapping adaptively to any different sized tile both on a algorithms but also with heterogeneous cores on irregular mesh or custom architecture. As a main contribution, we develop a regular/irregular mesh and on a custom network. Fig. 1 simple yet efficient interconnection matrix that models any task shows the methodology of our A3MAP. Given a task graph graph and network. Then, task mapping problem is exactly and a network as inputs, an interconnection matrix that can formulated to an MIQP (Mixed Integer Quadratic model any task graph and network along interconnection is Programming). Since MIQP is NP-hard [15], we propose two generated. Then, task mapping problem is exactly effective heuristics, a successive relaxation algorithm and a formulated to an MIQP (Mixed Integer Quadratic genetic algorithm. Experimental results show that A3MAP by Programming) and is solved by two effective heuristics since the successive relaxation algorithm reduces an amount of the MIQP is NP-hard [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Various Systems on Chips Embedded in Mobile Devices
    Innovative Systems Design and Engineering www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1727 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2871 (Online) Vol.4, No.7, 2013 - National Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Instrumentation & Communication Engineering Comparative Study of Various Systems on Chips Embedded in Mobile Devices Deepti Bansal(Assistant Professor) BVCOE, New Delhi Tel N: +919711341624 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Systems-on-chips (SoCs) are the latest incarnation of very large scale integration (VLSI) technology. A single integrated circuit can contain over 100 million transistors. Harnessing all this computing power requires designers to move beyond logic design into computer architecture, meet real-time deadlines, ensure low-power operation, and so on. These opportunities and challenges make SoC design an important field of research. So in the paper we will try to focus on the various aspects of SOC and the applications offered by it. Also the different parameters to be checked for functional verification like integration and complexity are described in brief. We will focus mainly on the applications of system on chip in mobile devices and then we will compare various mobile vendors in terms of different parameters like cost, memory, features, weight, and battery life, audio and video applications. A brief discussion on the upcoming technologies in SoC used in smart phones as announced by Intel, Microsoft, Texas etc. is also taken up. Keywords: System on Chip, Core Frame Architecture, Arm Processors, Smartphone. 1. Introduction: What Is SoC? We first need to define system-on-chip (SoC). A SoC is a complex integrated circuit that implements most or all of the functions of a complete electronic system.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomadik Application Processor Andrea Gallo Giancarlo Asnaghi ST Is #1 World-Wide Leader in Digital TV and Consumer Audio
    Nomadik Application Processor Andrea Gallo Giancarlo Asnaghi ST is #1 world-wide leader in Digital TV and Consumer Audio MP3 Portable Digital Satellite Radio Set Top Box Player Digital Car Radio DVD Player MMDSP+ inside more than 200 million produced chips January 14, 2009 ST leader in mobile phone chips January 14, 2009 Nomadik Nomadik is based on this heritage providing: – Unrivalled multimedia performances – Very low power consumption – Scalable performances January 14, 2009 BestBest ApplicationApplication ProcessorProcessor 20042004 9 Lowest power consumption 9 Scalable performance 9 Video/Audio quality 9 Cost-effective Nominees: Intel XScale PXA260, NeoMagic MiMagic 6, Nvidia MQ-9000, STMicroelectronics Nomadik STn8800, Texas Instruments OMAP 1611 January 14, 2009 Nomadik Nomadik is a family of Application Processors – Distributed processing architecture ARM9 + multiple Smart Accelerators – Support of a wide range of OS and applications – Seamless integration in the OS through standard API drivers and MM framework January 14, 2009 roadmap ... January 14, 2009 Some Nomadik products on the market... January 14, 2009 STn8815 block diagram January 14, 2009 Nomadik : a true real time multiprocessor platform ARM926 SDRAM SRAM General (L1 + L2) Purpose •Unlimited Space (Level 2 •Limited Bandwidth Cache System for Video) DMA Master OS Memory Controller Peripherals multi-layer AHB bus RTOS RTOS Multi-thread (Scheduler FSM) NAND Flash MMDSP+ Video •Unlimited Space MMDSP+ Audio 66 MHz, 16-bit •“No” Bandwidth 133 MHz, 24-bit •Mass storage
    [Show full text]
  • ARM Was Developed at Acron Computer Limited Of
    MEH420 Intro. To Embedded Systems ARM Processors ARM Processors • ARM was developed at Acron Computer • Based upon RISC Architecture with Limited of Cambridge, England between enhancements to meet requirements of 1983 & 1985 embedded applications. • RISC concept introduced in 1980 at Stanford • A large uniform register file and Berkley • Load-store architecture, where data processing operations operate on register contents only • ARM Limited founded in 1990 • Uniform and fixed length instruction • ARM Cores • 32-bit processor • Licensed to partners to develop and fabricate new • Instructions are 32-bit long microcontrollers • Good speed / power consumption ratio • Soft core • High code density -1- -2- -3- ARM Processors ARM Processors ARM Processors • Version 1 (1983-1985) (obsolete) • Version 5T • Enhancement to Basic RISC Features: • 26-bit addressing, no multiply or coprocessor • Superset of 4T adding new instruction • Version 5TE • Control over ALU and barrel shifter for every data • Version 2 (obsolete) processing operation to maximize their usage • Includes 32-bit result multiply co-processor • Add signal processing extension • Auto-increment and auto-decrement addressing • Version 3 • Examples: • ARM9E-S: v5TE (Sony Ericsson K-W series, TI modes to optimize program loops • 32-bit addressing • Load and Store multiple instructions to maximize OMAPs) data throughput • Version 4 • XScale: v4 (Samsung Omnia, Blackberry) • Conditional execution of instructions to maximize • Add signed, unsigned half-word and signed byte • Version 6 execution throughput load and store instructions • ARM11: ARMv6 (iPhone, Nokia E90, N95 etc) • Version 4T: Thumb compressed form of • Cortex-M0-M1: ARMv6 (STM32, NXP LPC, FPGA instruction introduced. Softcore) -4- -5- -6- ARM Processors ARM Processors: Common Features (till v5) ARM Processors: Basic ARM Organization • ARM v7: (M,E-M,R,A): Cortex-M3-M4, Cortex-R4-R5- R7, Cortex-A5-A7-A8-A9,A12, A15.
    [Show full text]
  • AXI Reference Guide
    AXI Reference Guide [Guide Subtitle] [optional] UG761 (v13.4) January 18, 2012 [optional] Xilinx is providing this product documentation, hereinafter “Information,” to you “AS IS” with no warranty of any kind, express or implied. Xilinx makes no representation that the Information, or any particular implementation thereof, is free from any claims of infringement. You are responsible for obtaining any rights you may require for any implementation based on the Information. All specifications are subject to change without notice. XILINX EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTY WHATSOEVER WITH RESPECT TO THE ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION OR ANY IMPLEMENTATION BASED THEREON, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS THAT THIS IMPLEMENTATION IS FREE FROM CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT AND ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Except as stated herein, none of the Information may be copied, reproduced, distributed, republished, downloaded, displayed, posted, or transmitted in any form or by any means including, but not limited to, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of Xilinx. © Copyright 2012 Xilinx, Inc. XILINX, the Xilinx logo, Virtex, Spartan, Kintex, Artix, ISE, Zynq, and other designated brands included herein are trademarks of Xilinx in the United States and other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. ARM® and AMBA® are registered trademarks of ARM in the EU and other countries. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Revision History The following table shows the revision history for this document: . Date Version Description of Revisions 03/01/2011 13.1 Second Xilinx release.
    [Show full text]
  • White Paper - Investigate the High-Level HDL Chisel
    White Paper - Investigate the high-level HDL Chisel Florian Heilmann, Christian Brugger, Norbert Wehn Microelectronics Research Group, University Kaiserslautern Kaiserslautern, Germany [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract— Chisel (Constructing Hardware in a Scala designer can simply not use it. Another approach involves embedded language) is a new programming language, which using a language suited for the domain of the target application. embedded in Scala, used for hardware synthesis. It aims to Examples include Esterel [4], which has been modeled for increase productivity when creating hardware by enabling reactive programs and DIL[5], which is an intermediate designers to use features present in higher level programming programming language used to target pipelined reconfigurable languages to build complex hardware blocks. In this paper, the architectures like PipeRench. Moreover, there are languages most advertised features of Chisel are investigated and compared like BlueSpec[6] which is essentially a subset of to their VHDL counterparts, if present. Afterwards, the authors’ SystemVerilog putting emphasis on avoiding race conditions opinion if a switch to Chisel is worth considering is presented. by automatically generating scheduling and arbitration logic Additionally, results from a related case study on Chisel are from a set of “rules” which express synthesizable behavior. briefly summarized. The author concludes that, while Chisel has promising features, it is not yet ready for use in the industry. These languages are usually designed to support a specific design domain. This, however, leads to these approaches performing poorly when used outside the domain they were intended for. Keywords—Hardware design; Chisel; VHDL; HDL III.
    [Show full text]
  • Wishbone Bus Architecture – a Survey and Comparison
    International Journal of VLSI design & Communication Systems (VLSICS) Vol.3, No.2, April 2012 WISHBONE BUS ARCHITECTURE – A SURVEY AND COMPARISON Mohandeep Sharma 1 and Dilip Kumar 2 1Department of VLSI Design, Center for Development of Advanced Computing, Mohali, India [email protected] 2ACS - Division, Center for Development of Advanced Computing, Mohali, India [email protected] ABSTRACT The performance of an on-chip interconnection architecture used for communication between IP cores depends on the efficiency of its bus architecture. Any bus architecture having advantages of faster bus clock speed, extra data transfer cycle, improved bus width and throughput is highly desirable for a low cost, reduced time-to-market and efficient System-on-Chip (SoC). This paper presents a survey of WISHBONE bus architecture and its comparison with three other on-chip bus architectures viz. Advanced Microcontroller Bus Architecture (AMBA) by ARM, CoreConnect by IBM and Avalon by Altera. The WISHBONE Bus Architecture by Silicore Corporation appears to be gaining an upper edge over the other three bus architecture types because of its special performance parameters like the use of flexible arbitration scheme and additional data transfer cycle (Read-Modify-Write cycle). Moreover, its IP Cores are available free for use requiring neither any registration nor any agreement or license. KEYWORDS SoC buses, WISHBONE Bus, WISHBONE Interface 1. INTRODUCTION The introduction and advancement of multimillion-gate chips technology with new levels of integration in the form of the system-on-chip (SoC) design has brought a revolution in the modern electronics industry. With the evolution of shrinking process technologies and increasing design sizes [1], manufacturers are integrating increasing numbers of components on a chip.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Soc Buses
    Vojin Oklobdzija/Digital Systems and Applications 6195_C007 Page Proof page 1 11.7.2007 2:16am Compositor Name: JGanesan 7 An Overview of SoC Buses 7.1 Introduction....................................................................... 7-1 7.2 On-Chip Communication Architectures ........................ 7-2 Background . Topologies . On-Chip Communication Protocols . Other Interconnect Issues . Advantages and M. Mitic´ Disadvantages of On-Chip Buses M. Stojcˇev 7.3 System-On-Chip Buses ..................................................... 7-4 AMBA Bus . Avalon . CoreConnect . STBus . Wishbone . University of Nisˇ CoreFrame . Manchester Asynchronous Bus for Low Energy . Z. Stamenkovic´ PI Bus . Open Core Protocol . Virtual Component Interface . m IHP GmbH—Innovations for High SiliconBackplane Network Performance Microelectronics 7.4 Summary.......................................................................... 7-15 7.1 Introduction The electronics industry has entered the era of multimillion-gate chips, and there is no turning back. This technology promises new levels of integration on a single chip, called the system-on-a-chip (SoC) design, but also presents significant challenges to the chip designers. Processing cores on a single chip may number well into the high tens within the next decade, given the current rate of advancements [1]. Interconnection networks in such an environment are, therefore, becoming more and more important [2]. Currently, on-chip interconnection networks are mostly implemented using buses. For SoC applications, design reuse becomes easier if standard internal connection buses are used for interconnecting components of the design. Design teams developing modules intended for future reuse can design interfaces for the standard bus around their particular modules. This allows future designers to slot the reuse module into their new design simply, which is also based around the same standard bus [3].
    [Show full text]
  • The Hardware Design Toolchain Approaches and State of the Art Fredo Erxleben August 27, 2014
    The Hardware Design Toolchain Approaches and State of the Art Fredo Erxleben August 27, 2014 We will hate the tools (FCCM 1996 prediction for 2001) We will still hate the tools (FCCM 1998 prediction for 2003) We will merely dislike the tools (FCCM 2000 prediction for 2005) We [will] hate the tools more (FCCM 2007 prediction for 2012) 1 Motivation used for hardware design will be presented in an attempt to outline where weaknesses in the currently available tool-chains for hardware de- Since the introduction of integrated circuits, sign are found. Due to the sheer amount of hardware complexity has increased rapidly and different approaches made over the years and constantly. This complexity naturally is a hard tools that were developed with the intention of thing for humans to handle once it reaches a helping to improve the design process, it is not certain threshold. As a consequence, the need possible to look at them all or in more detail. for tools arises to enable the people involved in Instead, in the following, an overview over ap- the hardware design process to continue work- proaches made to create tool-chains for hard- ing on, advancing and improving the matter. ware design or single tools to be used in them, While this is a fact for any evolving branch of shall be given. It will also be outlined, what science and production, the speed, by which the their current state in productive use is. tools adapt varies greatly. Taking software de- velopment as a comparison, we find that there are often a lot of tools available for one task, 2 Criteria each one of them filling a niche or being tai- lored with a special use-case in mind.
    [Show full text]