DOCSLIB.ORG

Blue Bioeconomy: Situation Report and Perspectives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blue Bioeconomy: Situation Report and Perspectives BLUE BIOECONOMY Situation report and perspectives LAST UPDATE: 2018 WWW.EUMOFA.EU Maritime affairs and Fisheries Manuscript completed in October 2018 Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of the following information. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 © European Union, 2018 Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Cover photo: © Shutterstock, 2018 For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. PDF ISBN 978-92-79-96713-9 doi: 10.2771/053734 FOR MORE INFORMATION AND COMMENTS: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries B-1049 Brussels Tel: +32 229-50101 E-mail: [email protected] Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Glossary....................................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms and abbreviations ........................................................................................................ 4 Section 1 - Mapping non-food uses of fisheries and aquaculture biomass ............................ 5 0 Introduction & Summary ................................................................................................... 6 0.1 Biomass inputs............................................................................................................... 7 0.2 Types of biomass ..........................................................................................................10 0.3 Supply chains ................................................................................................................11 0.4 Geographic sources of biomass ......................................................................................12 0.5 Wastes .........................................................................................................................13 0.6 Food and non-food uses of fisheries and aquaculture biomass .........................................14 0.7 Uses .............................................................................................................................15 0.8 Innovations in products, processes and markets..............................................................16 0.9 Potential Case Studies ...................................................................................................17 1 Fish..................................................................................................................................20 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................20 1.2 Fish biomass origin........................................................................................................21 1.3 Types of fish biomass ....................................................................................................22 1.4 Geographic sources of fish biomass................................................................................22 1.5 Non-food biomass from fish...........................................................................................25 1.6 Uses of fish biomass ......................................................................................................30 2 Invertebrates ...................................................................................................................39 2.1 Crustacea .....................................................................................................................39 2.2 Crustacean biomass types and amounts .........................................................................39 2.3 Geographic sources of biomass ......................................................................................40 2.4 Biomass with potential for non-food uses .......................................................................41 2.5 Uses of crustacea biomass .............................................................................................41 2.6 Molluscs .......................................................................................................................42 2.7 Cephalopods.................................................................................................................44 3 Seaweeds & microalgae ...................................................................................................44 3.1 Seaweeds .....................................................................................................................44 3.2 Microalgae ...................................................................................................................47 4 Current practices and the need for innovation ..................................................................49 4.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................49 4.2 Structural challenges.....................................................................................................50 4.3 End procedures .............................................................................................................53 4.4 Trends ..........................................................................................................................54 4.5 Potential Case Studies ...................................................................................................58 Section 2 - The size of demand .............................................................................................. 61 5 Introduction – some main trends......................................................................................62 5.1 Fish waste and fishery by-products.................................................................................62 5.2 Algae ...........................................................................................................................65 5.3 Focus on making better use of marine and aquaculture resources....................................66 6 The size of demand ..........................................................................................................67 6.1 Fish waste ....................................................................................................................67 6.2 Algae ...........................................................................................................................71 Section 3 - Top products and uses ......................................................................................... 74 7 Top non-food product and uses ........................................................................................75 7.1 The EU production and trade for fish waste ....................................................................75 7.2 The EU production and trade for algae ...........................................................................76 8 Main non-food product and uses ......................................................................................79 8.1 Fish waste: Norway, Iceland, Faroe Iceland, Denmark and others.....................................79 8.2 Non-food uses of algae..................................................................................................92 8.3 Algae industry in France, Ireland and Norway .................................................................94 Section 4 - Understanding the investment trends ................................................................ 99 9 Introduction................................................................................................................... 100 10 Conditions for Investment: Green lights.......................................................................... 100 10.1 France .................................................................................................................... 101 10.2 Portugal.................................................................................................................. 101 10.3 Québec ................................................................................................................... 102 11 The share of the blue bioeconomy on total investments ................................................. 103 12 Investment trends analysis of the blue bioeconomy segments ........................................ 104 13 Specific issues ................................................................................................................ 113 13.1 The case of Micro algae ........................................................................................... 113 13.2 The case of Shellfish by-products .............................................................................. 115 13.3 The case of sea-cucumbers....................................................................................... 116 13.4 The case of Seaweeds starch for bioplastics .............................................................. 119 13.5 The case of Seaweeds cooperative in Quebec ............................................................ 120 14 How to foster investment in the blue bioeconomy? .......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microalgae for Future Biodiesel Production: Algaculture, Environnement Impact Oumaima Ezzeroual1*, Nadia El Kadmiri1, 2
    Ezzeroual et al., Maghr. J. Pure & Appl. Sci., 7 N° 1 (2021) 8- 14 Maghrebian Journal of Pure and Applied Science ISSN : 2458-715X http://revues.imist.ma/?journal=mjpas&page=index https://doi.org/10.48383/IMIST.PRSM/mjpas-v6i2.22927 Microalgae for future biodiesel production: Algaculture, Environnement impact 1* 1, 2 Oumaima Ezzeroual , Nadia El Kadmiri 1 Sciences and Technology Department, Polydisciplinary Faculty of Taroudant, IBN ZOHR University, Taroudant, Morocco. 2 Laboratory of Medical Genetics and Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco. *Corresponding Author; Email: [email protected]; Phone: +212658227800. Received 21 Novembre 2020, Revised 31 January 2021, Accepted 28 February 2021 Abstract Currently, the continued use of petroleum based fuels is considered unsustainable due to resource depletion and the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the environment, in addition to land and water degradation. Therefore, biofuels from renewable sources can be an alternative to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels and contribute to maintaining a healthy global environment and economic profitability. Unfortunately, biodiesel produced from food stocks generally consumed by humans and animals can be a source of increased food market prices due to the increased use of arable land for growing biomass for the production of first and second generation biofuels. The production of biofuels from microalgae, as a third generation of biodiesel production, has some distinctive advantages, such as their rapid growth rate, greenhouse gas binding capacity and high lipid production capacity. This mini-study examines the current status of algae-based biofuels as a renewable energy source and their impact on the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Photobioreactors and Scale-Up Concepts Jeremy Pruvost, François Le Borgne, Arnaud Artu, Jean-François Cornet, Jack Legrand
    Industrial Photobioreactors and Scale-Up Concepts Jeremy Pruvost, François Le Borgne, Arnaud Artu, Jean-François Cornet, Jack Legrand To cite this version: Jeremy Pruvost, François Le Borgne, Arnaud Artu, Jean-François Cornet, Jack Legrand. Industrial Photobioreactors and Scale-Up Concepts. Elsevier. Advances Chemical Engineering, 48, pp.257-310, 2016, Photobioreaction Engineering, 10.1016/bs.ache.2015.11.002. hal-02539887 HAL Id: hal-02539887 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02539887 Submitted on 10 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. CHAPTER FIVE Industrial Photobioreactors and Scale-Up Concepts Jeremy Pruvost*,1, Francois Le Borgne†, Arnaud Artu*,†, Jean-Franc¸ois Cornet{, Jack Legrand* *GEPEA, Universite de Nantes, CNRS, UMR6144, Bd de l’Universite, Saint-Nazaire Cedex, France †AlgoSource Technologies, Bd de l’Universite, Saint-Nazaire Cedex, France { Universite Clermont Auvergne, ENSCCF, Clermont-Ferrand, France and CNRS, Institut Pascal, Aubiere, France 1Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 258 2. PBR Engineering and Scaling Rules 259 2.1 Main Parameters Affecting PBR Biomass Productivity 259 3. Modeling PBRs 274 3.1 Introduction 274 3.2 Overview of Light-Limited Growth Modeling in a PBR 275 3.3 Kinetic Growth Model 276 3.4 Modeling of Radiative Transfer 279 3.5 Determination of Radiative Properties 281 3.6 Solar PBR Modeling 281 4.
    [Show full text]
  • FRESHWATER PRAWN Macrobrachium Rosenbergii (De Man, 1879) (Crustacea: Decapoda) AQUACULTURE in FIJI: IMPROVING CULTURE STOCK QUALITY
    FRESHWATER PRAWN Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man, 1879) (Crustacea: Decapoda) AQUACULTURE IN FIJI: IMPROVING CULTURE STOCK QUALITY by Shalini Singh A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Marine Science Copyright © 2011 by Shalini Singh School of Marine Studies Faculty of Science, Technology and Environment The University of the South Pacific July, 2011 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my sponsors, the Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) and The University of the South Pacific (USP), for providing the opportunity to study for my master’s degree. My sincere thanks and gratitude to my supervisors, Dr. William Camargo (USP), Professor Peter Mather, Dr. Satya Nandlal, and Dr. David Hurwood (Queensland University of Technology - QUT) whose support, encouragement and guidance throughout this study is immensely appreciated. I am also very grateful to the following people for critically editing my thesis: Prof. Peter Mather, Dr. Satya Nandlal, Dr. William Camargo and Dr. Carmen Gonzales. Thank you all for your enormous support and guidance, which led to the successful completion of the project. I thank you all for allocating time from your very busy schedules to read my thesis. I would also like to thank the Fiji Fisheries Freshwater Aquaculture Section, particularly Naduruloulou Research Station, the staff for their immense effort and assistance, particularly in the hatchery and grow-out phases which could not have been successfully carried out without your support. I acknowledge the support, and assistance provided by ACIAR Project Officer Mr. Jone Vasuca and Kameli Lea for their immense effort during this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol County
    YOUTH JUSTICE VOTER GUIDE AND LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD: MASSACHUSETTS 2020 BRISTOL COUNTY WELCOME LETTER Each year, thousands of young people in Massachusetts come in contact with the juvenile justice system. These young people are disproportionately children of color, children from the child welfare system, children coming from areas of concentrated poverty, and LGBTQ children. For the majority of these young people, interactions with the juvenile justice system are overwhelmingly negative, and lead to poor outcomes and even increased delinquency. Progress in reforming our legal system into one that is fair and works to create positive outcomes for all system-involved youth, creating stronger and safer communities for everyone, is dependent on elected officials who support or oppose these reforms. This non-partisan voter guide is intended to ensure that you, as a voter, know your rights and are informed in our decisions. The primary focus of this voter guide is to provide the voting record of state elected officials currently in office. We also compiled information on resources from MassVOTE and the Massachusetts Chapter of the League of Women Voters regarding candidate forums in contested elections. This voter guide is intended for educational purposes. The above not-for-profit, non-partisan organizations do not endorse any candidates or political parties for public office. Table of Contents WELCOME LETTER IMPORTANT VOTER INFORMATION IMPORTANT ELECTION DATES SPECIAL COVID-19 ELECTION LAWS: VOTE SAFELY BY MAIL THE KEY ISSUES QUESTIONS TO ASK CANDIDATES IN CONTESTED ELECTIONS VOTING RECORD METHODOLOGY KEY TO THE SCORECARD Bristol County State Senators Bristol County State Representatives PARTNERS IMPORTANT VOTER INFORMATION Am I eligible to vote? You must be at least 18 years old, a US citizen on election day and registered to vote at least 10 days before the election.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Optimal Control for Biomass Productivity Maximization in a Photobioreactor Using Natural Light
    Periodic optimal control for biomass productivity maximization in a photobioreactor using natural light Frédéric Grognard, Andrei R. Akhmetzhanov, Olivier Bernard arXiv:1204.2906v1 [math.OC] 13 Apr 2012 RESEARCH REPORT N° 7929 April 12th, 2012 Project-Teams Biocore ISSN 0249-6399 ISRN INRIA/RR--7929--FR+ENG Periodic optimal control for biomass productivity maximization in a photobioreactor using natural light Frédéric Grognard∗, Andrei R. Akhmetzhanovy, Olivier Bernard∗ Project-Teams Biocore Research Report n° 7929 — April 12th, 2012 — 25 pages Abstract: We address the question of optimization of the microalgal biomass long term produc- tivity in the framework of production in photobioreactors under the influence of day/night cycles. For that, we propose a simple bioreactor model accounting for light attenuation in the reactor due to biomass density and obtain the control law that optimizes productivity over a single day through the application of Pontryagin’s maximum principle, with the dilution rate being the main control. An important constraint on the obtained solution is that the biomass in the reactor should be at the same level at the beginning and at the end of the day so that the same control can be applied everyday and optimizes some form of long term productivity. Several scenarios are possible depending on the microalgae’s strain parameters and the maximal admissible value of the dilution rate: bang-bang or bang-singular-bang control or, if the growth rate of the algae is very strong in the presence of light, constant maximal dilution. A bifurcation diagram is presented to illustrate for which values of the parameters these different behaviors occur.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is Not a Citeable Document
    This Meeting was Cancelled. THIS IS NOT A CITEABLE DOCUMENT NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Program and Abstracts of the 112th Annual Meeting March 29 – April 2, 2020 Baltimore, Maryland NSA 112th ANNUAL MEETING 1DWLRQDO6KHOO¿VKHULHV$VVRFLDWLRQ 7KH&URZQH3OD]D%DOWLPRUH,QQHU+DUERU+RWHO%$/7,025(0$5</$1' 0DUFK±$SULO 681'$<0$5&+ 6:30 PM 678'(1725,(17$7,21 DO NOT &DUUROO CITE 7:00 PM 35(6,'(17¶65(&(37,21 ,QWHUQDWLRQDO$%& 021'$<0$5&+ 678'(17%5($.)$67 VWXGHQWVRQO\ 6:30-8:00 AM +DOORI)DPH 3/(1$5</(&785(5RJHU0DQQ(9LUJLQLD,QVWLWXWHRI0DULQH6FLHQFH 8:00-8:50 AM ,QWHUQDWLRQDO$%& ,QWHUQDWLRQDO$ ,QWHUQDWLRQDO% ,QWHUQDWLRQDO& &DUUROO 21(+($/7+(3,*(120(6 6+(//),6+ 6+(//),6+*(1(7,&6 9:00-10:30 AM $1'0,&52%,20(6)520 5(6725$7,21$1' MUSSELS $1'*(120,&6 62,/723(23/(:25.6+23 &216(59$7,21 10:30-11:00AM 0251,1*%5($. 21(+($/7+(3,*(120(6 6+(//),6+ 6+(//),6+*(1(7,&6 6+(//),6+$48$&8/785( 11:00-12:30PM $1'0,&52%,20(6)520 5(6725$7,21$1' $1'*(120,&6 %86,1(66$1'(&2120,&6 62,/723(23/(:25.6+23 &216(59$7,21 12:30-1:30 PM /81&+%5($. 21(+($/7+(3,*(120(6 6+(//),6+ 6+(//),6+*(1(7,&6 1:30-2:15 PM $1'0,&52%,20(6)520 5(6725$7,21$1' /($6,1*$1'3(50,77,1* $1'*(120,&6 62,/723(23/(:25.6+23 &216(59$7,21 21(+($/7+(3,*(120(6 6+(//),6+ 6+(//),6+*(1(7,&6 2:15-3:00 PM $1'0,&52%,20(6)520 5(6725$7,21$1' /($6,1*$1'3(50,77,1* $1'*(120,&6 62,/723(23/(:25.6+23 &216(59$7,21 3:00-3:30 PM $)7(51221%5($.
    [Show full text]
  • ORAL PRESENTATIONS Michael P. Acquafredda, Ximing Guo, And
    ORAL PRESENTATIONS Michael P. Acquafredda, Ximing Guo, and Daphne Munroe PHENOTYPIC AND TRANSCRIPTOMIC RESPONSE OF FARMED ATLANTIC SURFCLAMS (SPISULA SOLIDISSIMA) TO REPEATED HEAT STRESS AND THE FEASIBILITY OF SELECTIVE BREEDING FOR GREATER HEAT TOLERANCE Michael P. Acquafredda, Nicole Deck, Michael Whiteside, Daphne Munroe, Lisa M. Ragone Calvo, David Bushek, Michael De Luca, and Ximing Guo DIVERSIFICATION OF BIVALVE AQUACULTURE IN THE NORTHEAST: TESTING SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF BAY SCALLOPS (ARGOPECTEN IRRADIANS) IN NEW JERSEY M. Victoria Agnew, Colleen A. Burge, Morgan E. Eisenlord, and Carolyn S. Friedman CAN PACIFIC OYSTERS BE USED TO MITIGATE EELGRASS WASTING DISEASE? Ali A. Albadran and Masami Fujiwara DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL CHANGES OF THE WHITE SHRIMP, LITOPENAEUS SETIFERUS, UNDER THE EXPOSURE OF PHENYLPYRAZOLE FIPRONIL Ali A. Albadran and Masami Fujiwara EFFECTS OF INSECTICIDES, FIPRONIL, AND IMIDACLOPRID ON THE GROWTH, SURVIVAL, AND BEHAVIOR OF BROWN SHRIMP, FARFANTEPENAEUS AZTECUS Pedro Alcivar-Marcillo, Miriam Alcivar-Arteaga, Gober Asunción, Mayra Galindo, Christian Saltos, Sofía Figueroa, Diana Villota, Diana Calvache, Benjamin Hall, Brenna Kelley, Joe Singh, Shana Singh, Cristian Argandona, Liliana Zuniga, Daniela Espinoza, Arturo Ruiz Luna, Cesar Alejandro Berlanga-Robles, Jorge Echevarria, Chika F. Ikeogu, and Acacia Alcivar-Warren THE MANGROVE GENOME AND EPIGENOME (MANGROVEENCODE) PROJECT: EFFORTS TO CONSERVE HEALTHY MANGROVES AND WETLANDS ECOSYSTEMS Acacia Alcivar-Warren ONE HEALTH EPIGENOMICS AND MICROBIOMES: FROM SOIL TO PEOPLE WORKSHOP: RECOGNITION TO WINNERS OF STUDENT TRAVEL AWARDS AND OUTSTANDING RESEARCHERS IN AQUACULTURE – ONE HEALTH PIONEERS ADDRESSING ECOSYSTEM, ANIMAL, AND PUBLIC HEALTH Acacia Alcivar-Warren THE SHRIMP GENOME AND EPIGENOME: A REVIEW OF GENOME SIZES, TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS, SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEATS, INTEGRATED VIRUSES AND EPIGENETIC COMPONENTS OF PENAEIDS Ricky J.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Invests in 'Clean-Tech' Aquaculture « Global Aquaculture Advocate
    5/21/2019 Canada invests in 'clean-tech' aquaculture « Global Aquaculture Advocate ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (/ADVOCATE/CATEGORY/ENVIRONMENTAL-SOCIAL- RESPONSIBILITY) Canada invests in ‘clean-tech’ aquaculture Monday, 20 May 2019 By Lauren Kramer DFO pledges millions to improve farms’ environmental performance The Sth’oqui Aquaculture Limited Partnership of the Sumas First Nation, which operates a 100-metric-ton tilapia farm in Chilliwack, British Columbia, now uses an anaerobic digester that converts sh waste to biogas, which is stored in these bags. https://www.aquaculturealliance.org/advocate/canada-invests-in-clean-tech-aquaculture/?headlessPrint=AAAAAPIA9c8r7gs82oWZBA 5/21/2019 Canada invests in 'clean-tech' aquaculture « Global Aquaculture Advocate A handful of aquaculture companies in British Columbia are upgrading their equipment to make their businesses cleaner, more sustainable and more ecient, thanks to grants they received from Canada’s Department of Fisheries and Oceans. DFO launched its Fisheries and Aquaculture Clean Technology Adoption Program in 2017, pledging a total of CAN $20 million over four years to help the sheries and aquaculture industries improve their environmental performance. To date, $9.3 million has been committed. The largest grant distributed was $101,817 to the Sth’oqui Aquaculture Limited Partnership of the Sumas First Nation, which operates a 100-metric-ton tilapia farm in Chilliwack, British Columbia. The grant supports the installation of an anaerobic digester which converts sh waste to biogas, fertilizer and water. In the process it reduces waste and produces low-carbon energy to power the land-based facility. Craig Hougen, executive director of the Sema:th Development Corporation, the Sumas First Nation’s (https://bcafn.ca/community/sumas-rst-nation/) economic development corporation, said handling waste was the biggest challenge for the farm.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOBEFISH Highlights, the GLOBEFISH Research Programme and the Commodity Updates
    4th issue 2017 GLOBEFISH HIGHLIGHTSA QUARTERLY UPDATE ON WORLD SEAFOOD MARKETS October 2017 ISSUE, with Jan-Jun 2017 Statistics ABOUT GLOBEFISH GLOBEFISH forms part of the Products, Trade and Marketing Branch of the FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department and is part of the FISH INFOnetwork. It collects information from the main market areas in developed countries for the benefit of the world’s producers and exporters. Part of its services is an electronic databank and the distribution of information through the European Fish Price Report, the GLOBEFISH Highlights, the GLOBEFISH Research Programme and the Commodity Updates. The GLOBEFISH Highlights is based on information available in the databank, supplemented by market information from industry correspondents and from six regional services which form the FISH INFOnetwork: INFOFISH (Asia and the Pacific), INFOPESCA (Latin America and the Caribbean), INFOPECHE (Africa), INFOSAMAK (Arab countries), EUROFISH (Central and Eastern Europe) and INFOYU (China). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultivation of Algae in Photobioreactors for Biodiesel Production Jeremy Pruvost
    Cultivation of algae in photobioreactors for biodiesel production Jeremy Pruvost To cite this version: Jeremy Pruvost. Cultivation of algae in photobioreactors for biodiesel production. Ashok Pandey; Christian Larroche; Claude-Gilles Dussap; Edgard Gnansounou; Samir Kumar Khanal; Steven Ricke. Biofuels: Alternative Feedstocks and Conversion Processes for the Production of Liquid and Gaseous Biofuels (Second Edition), Elsevier, pp.629-659, 2019, Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals, 978-0-12- 816856-1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-816856-1.00026-9. hal-02539898 HAL Id: hal-02539898 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02539898 Submitted on 20 Apr 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. CHAPTER 26 Cultivation of Algae in Photobioreactors for Biodiesel Production Jeremy Pruvost GEPEA, University of Nantes, CNRS, UMR6144, Saint-Nazaire, France 26.1 INTRODUCTION Photosynthetic microorganisms such as microalgae and cyanobacteria (named for conve- nience “microalgae” in what follows, except when cited) have a high potential in biofuel pro- duction. Their main advantages are: solar production with higher surface productivities than plants, simultaneous consumption of inorganic carbon, allowing a null carbon balance exploi- tation, and possible production in closed systems, offering several advantages including an intensified, controlled production with very low environmental impact (no fertilizer is released and water can be reused).
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Reefs; 2003
    POVERTY AND REEFS VOLUME 1 A GLOBAL OVERVIEW IMM Ltd Emma Whittingham, Jock Campbell and Philip Townsley IMM Ltd Innovation Centre Rennes Drive Exeter University Campus Exeter EX4 4RN IMM Ltd United Kingdom http://www.ex.ac.uk/imm DFID Department for International Development 1 Palace Street London SW1E 5HE United Kingdom http://www.dfid.gov.uk/ IOC/UNESCO Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1 Rue Miollis 75732 Paris Cedex 15 France http://www.ioc.unesco.org POVERTY AND REEFS VOLUME 1: A GLOBAL OVERVIEW Emma Whittingham Jock Campbell Philip Townsley i © 2003 IMM Ltd, Exeter, UK Typeset by Exe Valley Dataset Ltd, Exeter, UK Project Management by Swales & Willis, Exeter, UK Printed in France. Reference number: IOC/UNESCO/INF-1188, Poverty and Reefs, Volume 1: Global Overview, Volume 2: Case Studies. 260pp. Citation: “Whittingham, E., Campbell, J. and Townsley, P. (2003). Poverty and Reefs, DFID–IMM–IOC/UNESCO, 260pp.” Printed and distributed free by: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1, Rue Miollis, 75015 Paris, France. Tel: +33 1 45 68 10 10, Fax: +33 1 45 68 58 12 Website: http://ioc.unesco.org, Email: [email protected] DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariats of UNESCO and IOC concerning the legal status of any country or territory, or its authorities, or concerning the elimination of the frontiers of any country or territory. This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty and Coral Reefs
    POVERTY AND REEFS VOLUME 1 A GLOBAL OVERVIEW IMM Ltd Emma Whittingham, Jock Campbell and Philip Townsley IMM Ltd Innovation Centre Rennes Drive Exeter University Campus Exeter EX4 4RN IMM Ltd United Kingdom http://www.ex.ac.uk/imm DFID Department for International Development 1 Palace Street London SW1E 5HE United Kingdom http://www.dfid.gov.uk/ IOC/UNESCO Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1 Rue Miollis 75732 Paris Cedex 15 France http://www.ioc.unesco.org POVERTY AND REEFS VOLUME 1: A GLOBAL OVERVIEW Emma Whittingham Jock Campbell Philip Townsley i © 2003 IMM Ltd, Exeter, UK Typeset by Exe Valley Dataset Ltd, Exeter, UK Project Management by Swales & Willis, Exeter, UK Printed in France. Reference number: IOC/UNESCO/INF-1188, Poverty and Reefs, Volume 1: Global Overview, Volume 2: Case Studies. 260pp. Citation: “Whittingham, E., Campbell, J. and Townsley, P. (2003). Poverty and Reefs, DFID–IMM–IOC/UNESCO, 260pp.” Printed and distributed free by: Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO 1, Rue Miollis, 75015 Paris, France. Tel: +33 1 45 68 10 10, Fax: +33 1 45 68 58 12 Website: http://ioc.unesco.org, Email: [email protected] DISCLAIMER The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariats of UNESCO and IOC concerning the legal status of any country or territory, or its authorities, or concerning the elimination of the frontiers of any country or territory. This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries.
    [Show full text]