Grevillea Juniperina Subsp. Juniperina Plants Are Generally Killed by Fire and the Following Information Is Provided to Regeneration Is Only from Seed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grevillea Juniperina Subsp. Juniperina Plants Are Generally Killed by Fire and the Following Information Is Provided to Regeneration Is Only from Seed ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina Plants are generally killed by fire and The following information is provided to regeneration is only from seed. The assist authors of species impact production and accumulation of seed in statements, development and activity the soil seed bank and seed germination, proponents, and determining and consent therefore, are likely to be critical parts of authorities, who are required to prepare the life cycle. or review assessments of likely impacts on threatened species pursuant to the Inappropriate fire regimes are a primary provisions of the Environmental threat to the life cycle of G. juniperina Planning and Assessment Act 1979. subsp. juniperina . Urban development in These guidelines should be read in which buildings are located close to conjunction with the NPWS Information populations may result in the absence of Circular No. 2: Threatened Species fire or low fire frequency resulting in Assessment under the EP&A Act: The ‘8 reduced seedling recruitment. The Part Test’ of Significance (November smaller the remnant the more significant 1996). this impact is likely to be. High fire frequency (e.g. control burns to protect Survey buildings) is also likely to impact on seedling recruitment if there is Grevillea juniperina subsp. juniperina is insufficient time intervals between a small to medium sized shrub which can successive fires to allow the be readily identified in the field at any accumulation of seed in the soil time of the year. It is unlikely to be seedbank. Developments without an confused with any other species of adequate buffer or fire protection zone Grevillea growing in the region. between the bushland and buildings are Distinctive features include the often not likely to be compatible, therefore, spreading or horizontal habit, short with the fire requirements of the species. lateral branches and prickly, narrow and often bright green leaves. Distinctive The growth and maturation of plants of “spider” flowers may occur at anytime of G. juniperina subsp. juniperina may be the year in a range of colours including affected by any development or activity red, pink, yellow, pale orange and green. which impacts adversely on its habitat. Urban development, including road Potential habitat comprises woodland construction, in close proximity to areas on Wianamatta Shale and Tertiary populations is likely to cause degradation alluvium (often close to the boundary of habitat by overshading, altered between the two geologies), and is hydrology, increased soil nutrients, usually associated with lateritic gravels. introduction of weedy species, and Populations are often found in relatively dumping of fill and waste. High levels of open and/or disturbed sites and wetter disturbance often results in dense areas. Key associated species include regrowth of aggressive native or exotic Eucalyptus tereticornis, E. fibrosa, species, reducing suitable open habitat Melaleuca decora, Bursaria spinosa, conditions for G. juniperina subsp. Dillwynia sieberi, Daviesia ulicifolia, juniperina. Rural subdivision may result Goodenia hederacea and Themeda in grazing of habitat by domestic australis. animals, introduction of fill and high nutrient levels. Although larger plants of Life cycle of the species G. juniperina subsp. juniperina are Little information is available on the life usually left by animals it is likely that cycle of G. juniperina subsp. juniperina. young plants are more palatable. Sites of May 2002 G. juniperina subsp. juniperina.which considered significant. Sites of particular are actively grazed appear to have a significance would include the dominance of larger, mature plants with following: limited seedling recruitment. • Areas of intact habitat away from high disturbance areas. Threatening processes • Areas of intact habitat greater than 2 Clearing of native vegetation is a key ha. threatening process listed on Schedule 3 • Population sizes of >50 plants and a of the TSCA and relevant to G. varied age structure with active juniperina subsp. juniperina. Impacts recruitment of seedlings. may include direct loss of habitat and local populations, reduced size of Isolation/fragmentation populations, physical and genetic In view of the restricted distribution of isolation of populations and reduced size G. juniperina subsp. juniperina and its and quality of habitat. The core occurrence within a range of plant distribution of G. juniperina subsp. communities, it is likely that populations juniperina coincides with major growth were once well connected, at least within areas. The gradual loss of small areas of the core habitat area. Relatively intact habitat has a marked cumulative effect. corridors can still be identified, Remaining patches of G. juniperina particularly in the Blacktown-Mt.Druitt subsp. juniperina are surrounded by area. Populations of G. juniperina subsp. urban development and subject to high juniperina, however, are becoming levels of disturbance including rubbish increasingly isolated as bushland areas dumping, trampling, road works, changes are cleared or degraded. Isolation of in drainage, recreational activities, weed populations is likely to result in reduced invasion and inappropriate fire regimes. gene flow and low genetic diversity High fire frequency resulting in the which may affect long-term viability. disruption of life cycle processes and Due to limited natural seed dispersal loss of vegetation structure and (probably <-3 m) in G. juniperina subsp. composition is also listed on Schedule 3 juniperina, even minimal clearing may of the TSCA and should be considered in act as an effective barrier. The greater relation to G. juniperina subsp. the barrier the less potential for juniperina. High fire frequency is likely recolonisation of sites following local to result in the depletion of the soil seed extinctions. bank if intervals between fire events are Most developments will create barriers not sufficient for plants to grow to and include the construction of roads, maturity and produce seed. Frequent tracks, houses and factories. Activities fire may also promote the growth of such as mowing, frequent fires or the weedy species. Infrequent and/or low dumping of fill may also isolate intensity fires are also a threat to G. populations. Degradation of habitat is juniperina subsp. juniperina resulting in also likely to cause isolation of inadequate seed germination. populations in G. juniperina subsp. juniperina by creating barriers of dense Viable local population of the weed growth and reducing availability of species potential seedling establishment sites. The viable population size for G. juniperina subsp. juniperina is unknown. Regional distribution of the habitat. Until such information is available all G. juniperina subsp. juniperina is populations should be assumed to be restricted to the Sydney Basin Bioregion. viable. Limit of known distribution A significant area of habitat The northern limit of G. juniperina Until there is adequate protection of G. subsp. juniperina is at Pitt Town & the juniperina subsp. juniperina. all sites are western limit is around Londonderry. considered important and the habitat The southern and eastern limits are at May 2002 Kemps Creek and at Quakers Hill occur within three council reserves respectively. Old records extend further (Nurragingy, Dr Charles Mackay and east to the Prospect district, however, Durward Reserves) within the Blacktown these populations are now believed to be local government area, however, these extinct. are managed primarily as recreational reserves. Most other known sites of G. Adequacy of representation in juniperina subsp. juniperina occur on conservation reserves or other privately owned land or on similar protected areas Commonwealth land. G. juniperina subsp. juniperina is not considered to be One small population of G. juniperina adequately conserved. subsp. juniperina (11 plants) occurs at the edge of Castlereagh Nature Reserve Critical habitat in marginal habitat along the Northern Road. There is an unsubstantiated record Critical habitat cannot be declared for G. from Windsor Downs Nature Reserve juniperina subsp. juniperina as it is not (Haddin 1992) although if still present it listed on Schedule 1 of the TSC Act. appears to be uncommon. Populations For Further Information contact Threatened Species Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Division, Central Directorate NSW NPWS PO Box 1967, Hurstville NSW 2220 Phone 02 9585 6678. www.npws.nsw.gov.au References Benson, D & McDougall, L. (2000) Ecology of Sydney plant species Part 7b: Dicotyledon family Proteaceae to Rubiaceae. Cunninghamia 6(4):1058. Daniell, A. (1992). The garden of Dorian Gray – genetics and vegetation management. Urban Bushland Management – Into the melting pot (ponderings, processes and problems. Urban Bushland Management, Sydney. Makinson, R.O. (2000). Grevillea, Flora of Australia, 17A: (ABRS/CSIRO:Australia). McGillivray, D. (1993). Grevillea, a taxonomic revision. Melbourne University Press. Morris, E.C. (2000). Germination response of seven east Australian Grevillea species (Proteaceae) to smoke, heat exposure and scarification. Australian Journal of Botany. 48:179-189. Myerscough et. al. (2000). Ecology of Proteaceae with special reference to the Sydney region. Olde, P. & Marriot, N. (1995). The Grevillea Book. Kangaroo Press. Sinclair Knight Mertz (2000). Proposed Western Sydney Orbital Species Impact Statement. Prepared by Cumberland Flora & Fauna Interpretative Services and LesryK Environmental Consultants. IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER The NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service and the editor expressly disclaim all liability and responsibility to any person, whether a purchaser or reader of this document or not, in respect of anything done or omitted to be done by any person in reliance upon the contents of this document although every effort has been made to ensure that the information presented in this document is accurate and up to date. May 2002.
Recommended publications
  • Winter Edition 2020 - 3 in This Issue: Office Bearers for 2017
    1 Australian Plants Society Armidale & District Group PO Box 735 Armidale NSW 2350 web: www.austplants.com.au/Armidale e-mail: [email protected] Crowea exalata ssp magnifolia image by Maria Hitchcock Winter Edition 2020 - 3 In this issue: Office bearers for 2017 ......p1 Editorial …...p2Error! Bookmark not defined. New Website Arrangements .…..p3 Solstice Gathering ......p4 Passion, Boers & Hibiscus ......p5 Wollomombi Falls Lookout ......p7 Hard Yakka ......p8 Torrington & Gibraltar after fires ......p9 Small Eucalypts ......p12 Drought tolerance of plants ......p15 Armidale & District Group PO Box 735, Armidale NSW 2350 President: Vacant Vice President: Colin Wilson Secretary: Penelope Sinclair Ph. 6771 5639 [email protected] Treasurer: Phil Rose Ph. 6775 3767 [email protected] Membership: Phil Rose [email protected] 2 Markets in the Mall, Outings, OHS & Environmental Officer and Arboretum Coordinator: Patrick Laher Ph: 0427327719 [email protected] Newsletter Editor: John Nevin Ph: 6775218 [email protected],net.au Meet and Greet: Lee Horsley Ph: 0421381157 [email protected] Afternoon tea: Deidre Waters Ph: 67753754 [email protected] Web Master: Eric Sinclair Our website: http://www.austplants.com.au From the Editor: We have certainly had a memorable year - the worst drought in living memory followed by the most extensive bushfires seen in Australia, and to top it off, the biggest pandemic the world has seen in 100 years. The pandemic has made essential self distancing and quarantining to arrest the spread of the Corona virus. As a result, most APS activities have been shelved for the time being. Being in isolation at home has been a mixed blessing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Recovery of Woody Plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion
    Post-fire recovery of woody plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion Peter J. ClarkeA, Kirsten J. E. Knox, Monica L. Campbell and Lachlan M. Copeland Botany, School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, AUSTRALIA. ACorresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract: The resprouting response of plant species to fire is a key life history trait that has profound effects on post-fire population dynamics and community composition. This study documents the post-fire response (resprouting and maturation times) of woody species in six contrasting formations in the New England Tableland Bioregion of eastern Australia. Rainforest had the highest proportion of resprouting woody taxa and rocky outcrops had the lowest. Surprisingly, no significant difference in the median maturation length was found among habitats, but the communities varied in the range of maturation times. Within these communities, seedlings of species killed by fire, mature faster than seedlings of species that resprout. The slowest maturing species were those that have canopy held seed banks and were killed by fire, and these were used as indicator species to examine fire immaturity risk. Finally, we examine whether current fire management immaturity thresholds appear to be appropriate for these communities and find they need to be amended. Cunninghamia (2009) 11(2): 221–239 Introduction Maturation times of new recruits for those plants killed by fire is also a critical biological variable in the context of fire Fire is a pervasive ecological factor that influences the regimes because this time sets the lower limit for fire intervals evolution, distribution and abundance of woody plants that can cause local population decline or extirpation (Keith (Whelan 1995; Bond & van Wilgen 1996; Bradstock et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Little-Things-That-Run-The-City-Final
    The Little Things that Run the City Insect ecology, biodiversity and conservation in the City of Melbourne Luis Mata, Christopher D. Ives, Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez, Georgia E. Garrard, Ascelin Gordon, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Anna Backstrom, Daniel J. Bickel, Amy K. Hahs, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk, Kirsten Parris and Sarah A. Bekessy The Little Things that Run the City – Insect ecology, biodiversity and conservation in the City of Melbourne Report prepared for the City of Melbourne, August 2016 Coordinating authors Luis Mata1 Christopher D. Ives2 Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez3 Georgia E. Garrard1 Ascelin Gordon1 Sarah Bekessy1 1Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group, RMIT University 2Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University 3Forest Sciences Centre of Catalonia Contributing authors Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Anna Backstrom, Daniel J. Bickel, Amy K. Hahs, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L. Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk and Kirsten M. Parris. Cover artwork by Kate Cranney ‘Ant and lerps’ (Ink and paper on paper, 2016) Beetle stacked macro-photographs by Nick Porch. Dryinidid wasp stacked macro-photograph by Ken Walker. All other photographs by Luis Mata unless otherwise stated. The version of the report was finished in Melbourne (Victoria, Australia) the 15th of September 2016. Please cite as: The Little Things that Run the City – Insect ecology, biodiversity and conservation in the City of Melbourne (2016) Mata L, Ives CD, Morán-Ordóñez A, Garrard GE, Gordon A, Cranney K, Smith TR, Backstrom A, Bickel DJ, Hahs AK, Malipatil M, Moir ML, Plein M, Porch N, Semeraro L, Walker K, Vesk PA, Parris KM, Bekessy SA.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Tracker 97
    Proprietor: Ashley Elliott 230 Tannery Lane Mandurang Victoria 3551 Telephone: (03) 5439 5384 PlantPlant CatalogueCatalogue Facsimile: (03) 5439 3618 E-mail: [email protected] Central & Northern Victoria's Indigenous Nursery Please contact the nursery to confirm stock availablity Non-Local Plants aneura Mulga or Yarran Acacia ramulosa Horse Mulga or Narrow Leaf Mulga Acacia aphylla Acacia redolens Acacia argrophylla Silver Mulga Acacia restiacea Acacia beckleri Barrier Range Wattle Acacia rhigiophylla Dagger-leaved Acacia Acacia cardiophylla Wyalong Wattle Acacia riceana Acacia chinchillensis Acacia rossei Acacia cliftoniana ssp congesta Acacia spectabilis Mudgee Wattle Acacia cognata River Wattle - low form Acacia spinescens Spiny Wattle Acacia cognata River or Bower Wattle Acacia spongilitica Acacia conferta Crowded-leaf Wattle Acacia squamata Bright Sedge Wattle Acacia convenyii Blue Bush Acacia stigmatophylla Acacia cultriformis Knife-leaf Wattle Acacia subcaerulea Acacia cupularis Coastal prostrate Acacia vestita Hairy Wattle Acacia cyclops Round-seeded Acacia Acacia victoriae Bramble Wattle or Elegant Wattle Acacia declinata Acacia wilhelmiana Dwarf Nealie Acacia decora Western Silver Wattle Acacia willdenowiana Leafless Wattle Acacia denticulosa Sandpaper Wattle Acacia caerulescens caerulescens Buchan Blue Acacia drummondii subsp Dwarf Drummond Wattle Acanthocladium dockeri Laura Daisy drummondii Actinodium cunninghamii Albany Daisy or Swamp Daisy Acacia elata Cedar Wattle Actinodium species (prostrate form) Acacia
    [Show full text]
  • Sweet Bursaria Indigenous Plants for Ballarat Gardens
    SHRUB Indigenous Plants for Ballarat Gardens Sweet Bursaria Bursaria spinosa FAST FACTS Sweet Bursaria (Bursaria spinosa ) is an Seed : Small green, hearted-shaped Shrub Australian native shrub from around Ballarat. “purses” containing seed turn golden- Family: Pittosporaceae brown as they ripen and remain on the Location : Bursaria likes a sunny position Pittosporum shrub for several months. Yellow-tailed and will grow into an attractive small tree if Size: 4m H x 2m W Black-Cockatoos, Crimson Rosellas and the lower branches are removed. It has Position: Sunny other seed eating birds feast on the fruit so sharp spines along the stems so keep it at Soil: Well drained consider placing a bird-bath nearby. the back of a garden bed and plant smaller Flowers: Summer shrubs and groundcovers around the trunk Planting : Plant in a hole not much larger Fruits: Brown capsules to keep animals and children away. than the pot within a few days of purchase Care: Low maintenance and provide a full bucket of water Leaves : Glossy bright green leaves give the immediately. garden a lush look over dry summer months. Care : It’s probably best to remove lower Flowers : Bursaria in flower is one of our stems from young plants so that the thorny most beautiful and fragrant shrubs. It is canopy branches develop above head covered in clusters of small, cream flowers height. Wear gardening gloves and remove during mid-summer when much else in the the thorny branches to a safe place. garden is in decline. You will be delighted by the large number of native bees and Propagation : Good luck collecting seed butterflies which flock to feed on sweet from the brown capsules before the birds nectar and pollen.
    [Show full text]
  • Going to Sustainable
    GOING TO SUSTAINABLE Lowering Landscape and Garden Maintenance Including Better Ways to Water and How to Save Water © Joseph L. Seals, 2008, 2009 Copyright Joseph L. Seals, 2008, 2009 LOWERING MAINTENANCE REDUCING MAINTENANCE IN THE PLANNING STAGES Unfortunately, maintenance of the landscape is often assumed or overlooked during the planning and design phase of a project 1) Keep the planting design simple. The more elaborate the plan and planting -- Numbers of plants, variety of plants, -- less than simple lines and shapes -- … the more maintenance is required. For instance, lawn areas need to be plotted so that mowing, edging and periodic maintenance can be accomplished easily. -- Avoid tight angles and sharp corners. -- wide angles, gentle, sweeping curves, and straight lines are much easier to mow. -- Make certain each plant in the plan serves a purpose. 2) Select the right plant for the right place We all know that there are “sun plants” for sunny spots and “shade plants” for shady spots. And we don’t plant “sun plants” in shade nor do we plant “shade plants” in sun. And some of us know that there are drought-tolerant plants that like dry soil and little water -- and there are moisture-loving plants that like their feet wet. And we don’t mix those up either. Such “mix ups” result in everything from the obvious: outright death of the plant involved to a subtly stressed plant that shows various symptoms of “disease” -- whether it’s an actual organism or a physiological condition. Copyright Joseph L. Seals, 2008, 2009 Every time you push a plant beyond its natural adaptations, abilities, and tolerances, you invite problems and you invite higher maintenance When choosing the right plant, start with THE BIG PICTURE: We have a Mediterranean climate.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Proteaceae with Special Reference to the Sydney Region
    951 Ecology of Proteaceae with special reference to the Sydney region P.J. Myerscough, R.J. Whelan and R.A. Bradstock Myerscough, P.J.1, Whelan, R.J.2, and Bradstock, R.A.3 (1Institute of Wildlife Research, School of Biological Sciences (A08), University of Sydney, NSW 2006; 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522; 3Biodiversity Research and Management Division, NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service, PO Box 1967, Hurstville, NSW 1481) Ecology of Proteaceae with special reference to the Sydney region. Cunninghamia 6(4): 951–1015. In Australia, the Proteaceae are a diverse group of plants. They inhabit a wide range of environments, many of which are low in plant resources. They support a wide range of animals and other organisms, and show distinctive patterns of distribution in relation to soils, climate and geological history. These patterns of distribution, relationships with nutrients and other resources, interactions with animals and other organisms and dynamics of populations in Proteaceae are addressed in this review, particularly for the Sydney region. The Sydney region, with its wide range of environments, offers great opportunities for testing general questions in the ecology of the Proteaceae. For instance, its climate is not mediterranean, unlike the Cape region of South Africa, south- western and southern Australia, where much of the research on plants of Proteaceae growing in infertile habitats has been done. The diversity and abundance of Proteaceae vary in the Sydney region inversely with fertility of habitats. In the region’s rainforest there are few Proteaceae and their populations are sparse, whereas in heaths in the region, Proteaceae are often diverse and may dominate the canopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cunninghamia : a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia
    Benson & Howell, Cumberland Plain Woodland ecology then and now 631 Cumberland Plain Woodland ecology then and now: interpretations and implications from the work of Robert Brown and others Doug Benson and Jocelyn Howell Benson, Doug & Howell, Jocelyn (Plant Sciences Branch, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Mrs Macquaries Road, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia) 2002. Cumberland Plain Woodland ecology then and now: Interpretations and implications from the work of Robert Brown and others. Cunninghamia 7 (4): 631–650. (Paper presented at Robert Brown 200 conference.) By the time Robert Brown visited western Sydney (1802–1805), its vegetation was already beginning to be affected by settlers’ activities. The Cumberland Plain Woodland that occurred on the clay soils has now been extensively cleared and long-term management of remnants for species conservation is of high priority. Robert Brown’s collections in the area, together with descriptions by Atkinson, Cunningham and other writers, provide us with valuable information on the vegetation and its floristic composition. Supported by recent site monitoring at Mount Annan Botanic Garden at Campbelltown, we interpret this information in the light of current ecological knowledge and conclude that: • Woodland structure is variable in the short term; therefore seeking to conserve structure exactly as described in the historical literature is not necessarily appropriate. • While the historical literature provides evidence of the broad floristic composition of the Cumberland Plain area overall, it does not provide sufficient detail on individual sites; future management of specific sites must therefore be based on current data. • The evidence suggests relatively few species have become extinct overall, possibly because many species appear to be relatively long-lived, and have mechanisms to survive drought, fire and grazing, though not soil alteration.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants for a 'Sustainable” -- Low Maintenance – Garden and Landscape in Arroyo Grande
    PLANTS FOR A ‘SUSTAINABLE” -- LOW MAINTENANCE – GARDEN AND LANDSCAPE IN ARROYO GRANDE Low water use, minimal fertilizer needs, no special care Large Trees -- Cedrus libanii atlantica ‘Glauca’ BLUE ATLAS CEDAR Cedrus deodara DEODAR CEDAR Cinnamomum camphora CAMPHOR Gingko biloba GINGKO Pinus canariensis CANARY ISLAND PINE Pinus pinea ITALIAN STONE PINE Pinus sabiniana GRAY PINE Pinus torreyana TORREY PINE Quercus ilex HOLLY OAK Quercus suber CORK OAK Medium Trees -- Allocasuarina verticillata SHE-OAK Arbutus ‘Marina’ HYBRID STRAWBERRY TREE Brachychiton populneus KURRAJONG, AUSTRALIAN BOTTLE TREE Brahea armata BLUE HESPER PALM Butia capitata PINDO PALM Eucalyptus nicholii PEPPERMINT GUM Eucalyptus polyanthemos SILVER DOLLAR GUM Calocedrus decurrens INCENSE CEDAR Cupressus arizonica ARIZONA CYPRESS Cupressus forbesii TECATE CYPRESS Geijera parviflora AUSTRALIAN WILLOW Gleditsia triacanthos inermis THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST Juniperus scopulorum ‘Tolleson’s Blue Weeping’ BLUE WEEPING JUNIPER Melaleuca linariifolia FLAXLEAF PAPERBARK Metrosideros excelsus NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE Olea europaea OLIVE (only fruitless cultivars such as ‘Majestic Beauty’, ‘Wilsoni’) Pinus halepensis ALEPPO PINE Pistacia chinensis CHINESE PISTACHE Quercus chrysolepis CANYON LIVE OAK Sequoiadendron giganteum GIANT REDWOOD © Copyright Joe Seals 2009 Small Trees Acacia baileyana BAILEY’S ACACIA Acacia pendula WEEPING MYALL Celtis australis EUROPEAN HACKBERRY x Chiltalpa tashkentensis CHILTALPA Cordyline australis CABBAGE PALM Cotinus coggygria SMOKE TREE Eucalyptus
    [Show full text]
  • Jewel Bugs of Australia (Insecta, Heteroptera, Scutelleridae)1
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Jewel Bugs of Australia (Insecta, Heteroptera, Scutelleridae)1 G. CASSIS & L. VANAGS Abstract: The Australian genera of the Scutelleridae are redescribed, with a species exemplar of the ma- le genitalia of each genus illustrated. Scanning electron micrographs are also provided for key non-ge- nitalic characters. The Australian jewel bug fauna comprises 13 genera and 25 species. Heissiphara is described as a new genus, for a single species, H. minuta nov.sp., from Western Australia. Calliscyta is restored as a valid genus, and removed from synonymy with Choerocoris. All the Australian species of Scutelleridae are described, and an identification key is given. Two new species of Choerocoris are des- cribed from eastern Australia: C. grossi nov.sp. and C. lattini nov.sp. Lampromicra aerea (DISTANT) is res- tored as a valid species, and removed from synonymy with L. senator (FABRICIUS). Calliphara nobilis (LIN- NAEUS) is recorded from Australia for the first time. Calliphara billardierii (FABRICIUS) and C. praslinia praslinia BREDDIN are removed from the Australian biota. The identity of Sphaerocoris subnotatus WAL- KER is unknown and is incertae sedis. A description is also given for the Neotropical species, Agonoso- ma trilineatum (FABRICIUS); a biological control agent recently introduced into Australia to control the pasture weed Bellyache Bush (Jatropha gossypifolia, Euphorbiaceae). Coleotichus borealis DISTANT and C. (Epicoleotichus) schultzei TAUEBER are synonymised with C. excellens (WALKER). Callidea erythrina WAL- KER is synonymized with Lampromicra senator. Lectotype designations are given for the following taxa: Coleotichus testaceus WALKER, Coleotichus excellens, Sphaerocoris circuliferus (WALKER), Callidea aureocinc- ta WALKER, Callidea collaris WALKER and Callidea curtula WALKER.
    [Show full text]