DOCSLIB.ORG

Syntézová a Návrhová Časť

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Syntézová a Návrhová Časť „Podpora ochrany lokalít NATURA 2000 začlenením do celopriestorového systému ekologickej stability“ Regionálny územný systém ekologickej stability okresu Poprad Obsah – syntézová a návrhová časť ZOZNAM OBRÁZKOV, TABULIEK A GRAFOV ............................................................................... III PREHĽAD POUŽITÝCH SKRATIEK................................................................................................VIII II. SYNTÉZOVÁ ČASŤ ........................................................................................................................ 253 5. SYNTÉZA ANALYTICKÝCH VSTUPOV A HODNOTENIE............................................................. 253 5.1 HODNOTENIE EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY............................................................................. 253 5.2 PLOŠNÉ A PRIESTOROVÉ USPORIADANIE POZITÍVNYCH A NEGATÍVNYCH PRVKOV A JAVOV V KRAJINE ..................................................................................................................... 259 5.2.1 Hodnotenie stretov pozitívnych a negatívnych javov (izolácia, spojitosť, hustota).................. 259 5.2.2 Návrhy na zachovanie a zlepšenie existujúcich podmienok ....................................................... 263 5.3 HODNOTENIE TYPOV BIOTOPOV .......................................................................................... 264 5.3.1 Nelesné biotopy............................................................................................................................... 264 5.3.1.1 Vysokohorské a horské biotopy.................................................................................................. 265 5.3.1.2 Biotopy viazané na vodné toky (akvatické biotopy a brehové porasty) ...................................... 268 5.3.1.3 Rašeliniská a prameniská........................................................................................................... 269 5.3.1.4 Kosné lúky a pasienky................................................................................................................ 270 5.3.2 Lesné typy biotopov........................................................................................................................ 274 5.3.3 Hodnotenie typov biotopov európskeho a národného významu ................................................ 280 5.3.4 Hodnotenie ohrozenosti biotopov.................................................................................................. 283 5.3.5 Hodnotenie typov biotopov z hľadiska výskytu vzácnych, ohrozených a chránených druhov flóry............................................................................................................................................................ 286 5.3.6 Hodnotenie antropogénnych procesov a trendov ovplyvňujúcich biotu................................... 309 Deštrukcia a strata biotopov................................................................................................................................ 309 Fragmentácia biotopov........................................................................................................................................ 310 Synantropizácia bioty.......................................................................................................................................... 311 Kolonizácie nepôvodnými druhmi organizmov s osobitným zreteľom na invázne druhy .................................... 313 Sekundárna sukcesia.......................................................................................................................................... 315 Miznutie (extinkcia) pôvodných druhov............................................................................................................... 316 Veľkoplošné perturbácie biotopov....................................................................................................................... 317 5.4 EKOSTABILIZAČNÁ VÝZNAMNOSŤ, REPREZENTATÍVNOSŤ A UNIKÁTNOSŤ ................. 318 5.4.1 Porovnanie aktuálneho stavu vegetácie s potenciálnou prirodzenou vegetáciou.................... 318 5.4.2 Reprezentatívne potenciálne geoekosystémy .............................................................................. 320 5.5 HODNOTENIE KRAJINNEJ ŠTRUKTÚRY............................................................................... 323 III. NÁVRHOVÁ ČASŤ......................................................................................................................... 324 6. NÁVRH REGIONÁLNEHO ÚZEMNÉHO SYSTÉMU EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY ........................ 324 6.1 NÁVRH PRVKOV REGIONÁLNEHO ÚZEMNÉHO SYSTÉMU EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY .. 324 6.1.1 Biocentrá .......................................................................................................................................... 325 6.1.1.1 Biocentrá biosférického významu............................................................................................... 325 Biosférické biocentrum Tatry .......................................................................................................................... 325 6.1.1.2 Biocentrá provincionálneho významu......................................................................................... 338 Provincionálne biocentrum Slovenský raj...................................................................................................... 338 6.1.1.3 Nadregionálne biocentrá ............................................................................................................ 344 Biocentrum nadregionálneho významu Kráľovohoľské Nízke Tatry........................................................... 344 „Tento projekt je spolufinancovaný z ERDF“ i „Podpora ochrany lokalít NATURA 2000 začlenením do celopriestorového systému ekologickej stability“ Regionálny územný systém ekologickej stability okresu Poprad 6.1.1.4 Regionálne biocentrá.................................................................................................................. 351 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Vikartovská hoľa .................................................................................. 351 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Hrachovisko.......................................................................................... 355 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Kozie chrbty.......................................................................................... 358 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Brezové ................................................................................................. 361 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Blatá ...................................................................................................... 364 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Dielnice – Zadné lósy........................................................................... 367 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Baba – Paliesky.................................................................................... 370 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Hôrka – Primovské skaly..................................................................... 373 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Velický les............................................................................................. 376 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Krížová – Dubina.................................................................................. 379 Biocentrum regionálneho významu Magurka ................................................................................................ 381 6.1.2 Biokoridory....................................................................................................................................... 384 6.1.2.1 Biokoridory nadregionálneho významu ...................................................................................... 384 Biokoridor nadregionálneho významu Poprad .............................................................................................. 384 Biokoridor nadregionálneho významu Hornád.............................................................................................. 387 Biokoridor nadregionálneho významu Tatry – Kráľovohoľské Tatry – Kozie chrbty................................. 391 6.1.2.2 Biokoridory regionálneho významu ............................................................................................ 392 Biokoridor regionálneho významu Tatranské potoky ................................................................................... 392 Biokoridor regionálneho významu Slavkovský potok................................................................................... 394 Biokoridor regionálneho významu Tatry – Spišská Magura......................................................................... 397 Biokoridor regionálneho významu Tatry – Kráľovohoľské Tatry................................................................. 397 Biokoridor regionálneho významu Tatry – Kozie chrbty............................................................................... 398 6.2 NÁVRH MANAŽMENTOVÝCH OPATRENÍ PRE EXISTUJÚCE A NAVRHOVANÉ PRVKY REGIONÁLNEHO ÚZEMNÉHO SYSTÉMU EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY...................................... 400 6.2.1 Diferencovaná starostlivosť o biotopy európskeho a národného významu.............................. 400 6.2.2 Eliminácia stresových faktorov...................................................................................................... 403 6.3 NÁVRH OPATRENÍ NA ZVÝŠENIE EKOLOGICKEJ STABILITY KRAJINY........................... 406 6.4 NÁVRH PRVKOV REGIONÁLNEHO ÚZEMNÉHO
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Travaux Scientifiques Du Parc National De La Vanoise : BUVAT (R.), 1972
    ISSN 0180-961 X a Vanoise .'.Parc National du de la Recueillis et publiés sous la direction de Emmanuel de GUILLEBON Directeur du Parc national et Ch. DEGRANGE Professeur honoraire à l'Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble Ministère de l'Environnement Direction de la Nature et des Paysages Cahiers du Parc National de la Vanoise 135 rue du Docteur Julliand Boîte Postale 706 F-73007 Chambéry cedex ISSN 0180-961 X © Parc national de la Vanoise, Chambéry, France, 1995 SOMMAIRE COMPOSITION DU COMITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE ........................................................................................................ 5 LECTURE CRITIQUE DES ARTICLES .......................................................................................................................... 6 LISTE DES COLLABORATEURS DU VOLUME ..................................................................................................... 6 EN HOMMAGE : ]V[arius HUDRY (1915-1994) ........................................................................................... 7 CONTRIBUTIONS SCIENTIFIQUES M. HUDRY (+). - Vanoise : son étymologie .................................................................................. 8 J. DEBELMAS et J.-P. EAMPNOUX. - Notice explicative de la carte géolo- gique simplifiée du Parc national de la Vanoise et de sa zone périphé- rique (Savoie) ......................................................................................................,.........................................^^ 16 G. NlCOUD, S. FUDRAL, L. JUIF et J.-P. RAMPNOUX. - Hydrogéologie
    [Show full text]
  • The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 and Appendices
    Contents Page Section 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Biodiversity action in Orkney – general outline of the Plan 6 1.2 Biodiversity Action Planning - the international and national contexts 6 • The Scottish Biodiversity Strategy 1.3 Recent developments in environmental legislation 8 • The Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 • The Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 • The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 1.4 Biodiversity and the Local Authority Planning System 12 • The Orkney Local Development Plan 2012-2017 1.5 Community Planning 13 1.6 River Basin Management Planning 13 1.7 Biodiversity and rural development policy 14 • The Common Agricultural Policy • Scotland Rural Development Programme 2007-2013 1.8 Other relevant national publications 15 • Scotland’s Climate Change Adaptation Framework • Scotland’s Land Use Strategy • The Scottish Soil Framework 1.9 Links with the Orkney Biodiversity Records Centre 16 Section 2 Selection of the Ten Habitats for Inclusion in the Orkney Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 17 1 • Lowland fens 19 2 • Basin bog 27 3 • Eutrophic standing waters 33 4 • Mesotrophic lochs 41 5 • Ponds and milldams 47 6 • Burns and canalized burns 53 7 • Coastal sand dunes and links 60 8 • Aeolianite 70 9 • Coastal vegetated shingle 74 10 • Intertidal Underboulder Communities 80 Appendix I Species considered to be of conservation concern in Orkney Appendix II BAP habitats found in Orkney Appendix III The Aichi targets and goals 3 Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 Section 1 – Introduction What is biodiversity? a) Consider natural systems – by using The term ‘biodiversity’ means, quite simply, knowledge of interactions in nature and how the variety of species and genetic varieties ecosystems function.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Slovenian Microlepidoptera
    Prejeto / Received: 14.6.2010 Sprejeto / Accepted: 19.8.2010 Check list of Slovenian Microlepidoptera Tone LESAR(†), Marijan GOVEDIČ1 1 Center za kartografijo favne in flore, Klunova 3, SI-1000 Ljubljana; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. A checklist of the Microlepidoptera species recorded in Slovenia is presented. Each entry is accompanied by complete references, and remarks where appropriate. Until now, the data on Microlepidopteran fauna of Slovenia have not been compiled, with the existing information scattered in literature, museums and private collections throughout Europe. The present checklist is based on records extracted from 290 literature sources published from 1763 (Scopoli) to present. In total, 1645 species from 56 families are listed. Keywords: Microlepidoptera, checklist, Slovenia, fauna Izvleček. SEZNAM METULJČKOV (MICROLEPIDOPTERA) SLOVENIJE – Predstavljen je seznam vrst metuljčkov, zabeleženih v Sloveniji. Za vsako vrsto so podane reference, kjer je bilo smiselno, pa tudi komentar. Do sedaj podatki o metuljčkih Slovenije še niso bili zbrani, obstoječi podatki pa so bili razpršeni v različnih pisnih virih, muzejskih in zasebnih zbirkah po Evropi. Predstavljeni seznam temelji na podatkih iz 290 pisnih virov, objavljenih od 1763 (Scopoli) do danes. Skupaj je navedenih 1645 vrst iz 56 družin. Ključne besede: Microlepidoptera, seznam vrst, Slovenija, živalstvo NATURA SLOVENIAE 12(1): 35-125 ZOTKS Gibanje znanost mladini, Ljubljana, 2010 36 Tone LESAR & Marijan GOVEDIČ: Check List of Slovenian Microlepidoptera / SCIENTIFIC PAPER Introduction Along with beetles (Coleoptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are one of the most attractive groups for the amateur insect collectors, although the number of researchers professionally engaged in these two groups is relatively high as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Intraspecific DNA Barcode Splits and Hybridisation in the Udea
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 746:Deep 51–90 intraspecific (2018) DNA barcode splits and hybridisation in theUdea alpinalis group... 51 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.746.22020 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Deep intraspecific DNA barcode splits and hybridisation in the Udea alpinalis group (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) – an integrative revision Richard Mally1, Peter Huemer2, Matthias Nuss3 1 University Museum of Bergen, Natural History Collections, Realfagbygget, Allégaten 41, 5007 Bergen, Norway 2 Tiroler Landesmuseen Betriebsges.m.b.H., Natural History Department, Collections and Research Center, Krajnc-Str. 1, 6060 Hall, Austria 3 Senckenberg Museum of Zoology, Königsbrücker Landstraße 159, 01109 Dresden, Germany Corresponding author: Richard Mally ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Plant | Received 2 November 2017 | Accepted 15 February 2018 | Published 13 March 2018 http://zoobank.org/DF12B2D0-4155-4B10-B3A3-A0B1E755DFF6 Citation: Mally R, Huemer P, Nuss M (2018) Deep intraspecific DNA barcode splits and hybridisation in the Udea alpinalis group (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Crambidae) – an integrative revision. ZooKeys 746: 51–90. https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.746.22020 Abstract The analysis of mitochondrial COI data for the European-Centroasian montaneUdea alpinalis species group finds deep intraspecific splits. Specimens ofU. austriacalis and U. rhododendronalis separate into several biogeographical groups. These allopatric groups are not recovered in the analyses of the two nuclear markers wingless and Elongation factor 1-alpha, except for U. austriacalis from the Pyrenees and the French Massif Central. The latter populations are also morphologically distinct and conspecific with Scopula donzelalis Guenée, 1854, which is removed from synonymy and reinstated as Udea donzelalis (Guenée, 1854) stat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2018-2022 (LBAP) Is the Third in a Series of Focused Revisions of the Original Orkney LBAP (2002)
    Version 1.3: A targeted action plan for 2018 - 2022 Prepared by Orkney’s Biodiversity Steering Group for the Orkney Environment Partnership August 2018 This page is intentionally blank. 1 Orkney’s Community Biodiversity Project is supported by the following organisations: 2 Contents Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................................ 5 The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan – general outline .............................. 9 Biodiversity Action Planning – internationally and nationally ............................... 9 The Orkney Wildlife Information and Records Centre ....................................... 11 Section 2: Biodiversity themes .............................................................................. 12 Theme 1: Greenspace ...................................................................................... 12 Theme 2: Farmland ........................................................................................... 19 Theme 3: Peatland ............................................................................................ 26 Blanket Bog habitat description ......................................................................... 35 Basin Bog habitat description ............................................................................ 39 Upland Heathland habitat description ............................................................... 42 Theme 4: The Marine Environment ................................................................... 47
    [Show full text]
  • Tutela ODBORNÝ ČASOPIS SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY a JASKYNIARSTVA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 15 Číslo 2
    tutela ODBORNÝ ČASOPIS SLOVENSKÉHO MÚZEA OCHRANY PRÍRODY A JASKYNIARSTVA V LIPTOVSKOM MIKULÁŠI 15 číslo 2 NATUR AE 2011 121 O B S A H Igor Gallay – Zuzana Gallayová: Zarastanie nelesných plôch vo veľkoplošných chránených Odborný časopis zameraný na pôvodné a originálne vedecké a odborné práce z oblasti územiach Slovenska za ostatných 15 rokov (na základe Corine Land Cover) ....................... 125 ochrany prírody, mapovania bio a abio zložky prírodného prostredia so zameraním na Peter Kučera: Doplnky k výskytu niektorých drevín pod Vysokými Tatrami ................... 137 chránené územia a územia v systéme NATURA 2000 na Slovensku. Jozef Šteffek – Marek Čiliak: Výsledky malakocenologického výskumu z európsky významných biotopov severnej časti CHKO Kysuce ................................................................. 141 Ľubomír Vidlička: Ucholaky (Dermaptera) a srpice (Mecoptera) intravilánu obce Bučany (Trnavská pahorkatina) .................................................................................................................... 147 Oto Majzlan: Sekundárne mokrade a fauna chrobákov (Coleoptera) pri obci Koš ............. 153 Oto Majzlan: Cenózy chrobákov (Coleoptera) vo vinohradoch Sv. Jura pri Bratislave ...... 161 Ľubomír Panigaj – Miroslav Kulfan: Altitudinálny gradient v rozšírení motýľov (Lepidoptera) na transekte vo Velickej doline (Vysoké Tatry) ................................................ 179 Ján Kliment: Botanická bibliografia Veľkej Fatry (Lišajníky, Machorasty, Papraďorasty a semenné rastliny, rastlinné
    [Show full text]
  • 5 HUEMER 2 2011.XP:ACTA BIANCO 2/2007.XP 24.11.11 8:57 Page 169
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Acta Entomologica Slovenica Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 19 Autor(en)/Author(s): Huemer Peter, Krpac Vladimir T., Plössl B., Tarmann Gerhard Michael Artikel/Article: CONTRIBUTION TO THE FAUNA OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE MAVROVO NATIONAL PARK (REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA) 169-186 5 HUEMER 2_2011.XP:ACTA BIANCO 2/2007.XP 24.11.11 8:57 Page 169 ©Slovenian Entomological Society, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA SLOVENICA LJUBLJANA, NOVEMBER 2011 Vol. 19, øt. 2: 169–186 CONTRIBUTION TO THE FAUNA OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE MAVROVO NATIONAL PARK (REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA) P. HUEMER1, V. KRPAŒ2, B. PLÖSSL3, G. TARMANN1 1 Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen, Tiroler Landesmuseen Betriebsges.m.b.H., Feldstr. 11a, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. p.huemer@tiroler- landesmuseen.at; [email protected] 2 National Institution Macedonian Museum of Natural History, Boulevard Ilinden 86, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. [email protected] 3 Bruneckerstraße 2c, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Abstract – A short-term faunistic survey of Lepidoptera of the Mavrovo National Park (Republic of Macedonia) resulted in records of 401 species of Lepidoptera, almost twice as much as hitherto known from this area. Of particular interest are 48 species which, according to Fauna Europaea, are new country records. Furthermore, 4 species are probably new to science. KEY WORDS: faunistics, new records, Lepidoptera, Mavrovo National Park, Republic of Macedonia Izvleœek – PRISPEVEK K FAVNI METULJEV MAVROVSKEGA NARODNE- GA PARKA (REPUBLIKA MAKEDONIJA) Kratkotrajna favnistiœna raziskava metuljev (Lepidoptera) Mavrovskega narodnega parka v Republiki Makedoniji je dala podatke o 401 vrsti metuljev, skoraj dvakrat toliko, kot jih je bilo s tega obmoœja znanih poprej.
    [Show full text]
  • Sparganothis Praecana Habeleri Ssp.N. - Aus Den Wölzer Tauern, Steiermark, Österreich (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Sparganothini)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Österreichischer Entomologen Jahr/Year: 1997 Band/Volume: 49 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lichtenberger Franz Artikel/Article: Sparganothis praecana habeleri ssp.n. - aus den Wölzer Tauern, Steiermark, Österreich (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Sparganothini). 1-8 ©Arbeitsgemeinschaft Österreichischer Entomologen, Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Z.Arb.Gem.Öst.Ent. 49 1-8 Wien, 15.5. 1997 ISSN 0375-5223 Sparganothis praecana habeleri ssp.n. - aus den Wölzer Tauern, Steiermark, Österreich (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Sparganothini) Franz LICHTENBERGER Abstract Sparganothis praecana habeleri ssp.n. - a new subspecies from the Austrian Alps (Wölzer Tauern, Styria) - is described and figured (genitalia etc.). The new subspecies differs from the typical form primarily in the larger size and darker colour. It is compared with specimens from Scandinavia and from Altai. The species is recorded from Central Europe for the first time. Key words: Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, Sparganothini, new subspecies, Austria, Styria. Einleitung Nach dem heutigen Stand der Kenntnis ist die Gattung Sparganothis in der Paläarktischen Region nur durch fünf Arten vertreten: Sparganothis matsudaiYASUDA und Sparganothis i7/us/ris RAZOWSKI endemisch in Japan; Sparganothis rubicundana (HERRICH-SCHÄFFER) in Skandinavien und lokal in den Sudeten, mährisch-schlesische Region; Sparganothispilleriana (DENIS & SCHIFFERMÜLLER) über weite Teile der Paläarktis und in Mitteleuropa gemein; und schließlich Sparganothis praecana (KENNEL), mit einer recht eigenartigen Verbreitung in Skandinavien, in den ostsibirischen Gebirgen und im Altai (russischer und mongolischer Teil). Eine echte Überraschung ist daher das Auffinden von S. praecana in den lepidopterologisch gut erforschten Steirischen Alpen. Die neue Unterart wird dem verdienten steirischen Lepidopterologen Herrn Dipl.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of Invertebrate Features of Designated Sites in Scotland
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 1007 A revision of invertebrate features of designated sites in Scotland COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 1007 A revision of invertebrate features of designated sites in Scotland For further information on this report please contact: Athayde Tonhasca Scottish Natural Heritage Battleby PERTH PH1 3EW Telephone: 01738 458671 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Littlewood, N.A. 2017. A revision of invertebrate features of designated sites in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 1007. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2017. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary A revision of invertebrate features of designated sites in Scotland Commissioned Report No. 1007 Project No: 013952 Contractor: Nick Littlewood Year of publication: 2017 Keywords assemblages; invertebrates; notified features; qualifying features; site condition monitoring; SSSI Background Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) are designated on the basis of notified features. For invertebrates, notified features range from individual species, through assemblages of a specific taxon, to the overall invertebrate assemblage. For a variety of reasons, the invertebrates’ notified features do not always reflect the currently established criteria for selecting such features for site protection and designation purposes. In some cases, citations are based on old records that may now be considered unreliable whilst in others, the records do not demonstrate that the species or assemblages are of sufficient quality to meet the criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • REVUE N 61 / 01-240 News:Pp. 01-240 28-11-2008 8:48 Pagina 155
    REVUE n 61 / 01-240 news:pp. 01-240 28-11-2008 8:48 Pagina 155 REV. VALDÔTAINE HIST. NAT. - 61-62: 155-178 (2007-2008) I microlepidotteri raccolti nel 2006 nella zona di ampliamento del Parco Naturale Mont Avic (alta valle di Champorcher)* GIORGIO BALDIZZONE Vvia Manzoni, 24, I - 14100 Asti e-mail: [email protected] G. Baldizzone. Microlepidoptera gathered in 2006 in the new part of the Mont Avic Natural Park (Champorcher area). Rev. Valdôtaine Hist. Nat., 61/62: 155-178, 2007/2008. The author shows the results of the survey carried out in 2006 on Microlepidoptera in the new part of the Mont Avic Natural Park in the Champorcher upper valley. 148 species were identified, 70 of which had not been count- ed in the previous research project on the historical part of the Park (Chalamy Valley). Among them, 16 are mentioned for the first time in the Aosta Valley, while 2 species are new to Italian wildlife: Caryocolum pullatella (Tengström, 1848) (Gelechiidae) and Hypochalcia dignella (Hübner, 1796) (Pyralidae). General geographical distribution, current knowledge about its presence in Italy and known data about feed plants are given for each species. Key words: Microlepidoptera, new records, Western Alps. PREMESSA La nota che segue presenta i risultati della ricerca svoltasi nel corso del 2006 finalizzata allo studio del popolamento a microlepidotteri della parte di recente inserimento nel Parco Naturale Mont Avic, nell’alta valle di Champorcher. Per motivi climatici, sia dovuti alla quota elevata, sia per l’andamento stagionale, che per le note caratteristiche di piovosità della valle, le ricerche si sono svolte in un arco di tempo limitato, dalla prima settimana di giugno ai primi giorni di agosto, con soggiorni settimanali regolari.
    [Show full text]
  • Schmetterlinge Um Bad Mitterndorf in Der Steiermark Veränderungen Im
    © Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Steiermark; download unter www.zobodat.at Mitteilungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereines für Steiermark Bd. 143 S. 131–248 Graz 2014 Schmetterlinge um Bad Mitterndorf in der Steiermark Veränderungen im Verlauf von 2 Jahrzehnten Von Heinz Habeler1 Mit 62 Abbildungen, 20 Tabellen und 5 Tafeln Angenommen am 27. November 2013 In Dankbarkeit meiner Frau Ingrid gewidmet, sie hat mich in das Gebiet gebracht Summary: Butterflies around Bad Mitterndorf in Styria – changes within 20 years of moni- toring. – Bad Mitterndorf is a village in the northwest-corner of Styria. In the last 20 years of field studies it was possible to find 1.172 species of butterflies and moth with the result of 16.270 sampling data. A great problem is the future of bogs and moist meadows because without cultivation these habi- tats would transform into forests. Therefore a habitat-management would be necessary. Many diagrams and comments on special species in this paper illustrate the high diversity of Lepidoptera in this region and many photographs of living specimens in their natural habitat give an idea of the sometimes in- conceivible beauty but also the endangering of species. Zusammenfassung: Im Verlauf von 20 Jahren Feldarbeit konnten im Gebiet während 549 Einzelexkursionen 1.172 Arten von Schmetterlingen aus 52 Familien festgestellt und mit 16.270 Fund- daten dokumentiert werden. Den an Moore gebundenen Arten kommt dabei besondere Bedeutung zu. Der Fortbestand der dort vorkommenden Populationen ist keineswegs gesichert, da auf die Notwen- digkeit eines Biotopverbundes von Raupenhabitat und damit verzahnten Lebensräumen der Nektar- blüten für die Falter bisher nicht geachtet worden ist.
    [Show full text]