DOCSLIB.ORG

Prof. Ravi Gomatam Curriculum Vitae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prof. Ravi Gomatam Curriculum Vitae Prof. Ravi Gomatam Curriculum Vitae Education (1998) Ph.D. in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Mumbai University (1974) M.E. in Electronics Engineering, BITS, Pilani, India (1972) B.E. in Electronics Engineering, Annamalai University, India Positions Held Director, Institute of Semantic Information Sciences and Technology (www.insist.ac.in), 2008-current Visiting Professor, Indian Council of Philosophical Research (ICPR), New Delhi, 2016-2017 Director, Bhaktivedanta Institute, Berkeley & Mumbai (www.bvinst.edu), 1997-current Adjunct Professor, Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences (BITS), Pilani, India, 1997-2007 Professor and Ph.D. Guide, University of Mumbai, 2015-Present Career Arc After Masters, moved to USA, worked with many fortune- 500 companies in Detroit, in the areas of operating system design, data communications and very large data base design. Returned to academics, obtained Ph.D. in Philosophy, foundations of quantum mechanics, from University of Mumbai. Over two decades of experience in research, post-graduate level teaching, and guiding M.S./Ph.D. dissertations. Pioneering work in three different fields of science Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics Semantic Information Sciences and Technology (SIST) Consciousness Studies Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics (MQM) Developing a quantum theory of the macroscopic regime logically independent of current microscopic quantum mechanics (mQM). A Nobel Laureate in quantum physics has remarked regarding his approach: "We can get out of the confusions in QM with this approach. Perhaps, this is how we should be doing science." His work in Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics (MQM) has already been cited in wide ranging fields from control engineering, neuroscience, ecology and marketing theory. Two of his papers have been part of curriculum at Masters level in courses at Brown University and University of Connecticut. Semantic Information Science and Technology (SIST) Pioneering the new field of Semantic Information Sciences & Technology. It is based on the idea of Objective Semantic Information, a new concept of matter based on his MQM. The Institute of Semantic Information Sciences is affiliated to University of Mumbai for awarding M.A. (by research) and Ph.D. degrees in Philosophy of Science based on SIST. A 4-year B. Tech is ready in SIST. Looking for collaboration with a good technological University. SIST will be applicable across all fields of sciences & technology. Consciousness Studies Organized the First International Conference on the Study of Consciousness within Science in 1990 in San Francisco. Speakers were who’s who of Consciousness researchers including two Nobel Laureates – George Wald and John Eccles. Published and reviewed papers of Journal of Consciousness Studies among others. Conceived and designed world’s first M.S/Ph.D. program in Consciousness Studies in collaboration with Birla Institute of Technology & Science (BITS), Pilani in 1997 in Mumbai. Inaugurated by Prof. Charles Townes, Nobel Laureate. Alumni have gone to study in leading universities like Harvard, Leeds and Utrecht. Developed his own unique approach to Consciousness Studies as a scientific study of experience independent of consciousness, by treating brain as a single system, a phenomenal whole via his Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics (MQM). Current Research Interests Complex analysis; Macroscopic Quantum mechanics; Semantic search engine; Quantum Computing; Foundations of Chemistry; Entropy and information; Biology and information; History and Philosophy of Science; Vedic Bhaghavata Sankhya concepts of matter. Visiting Scholar Positions University of Pretoria, South Africa, Department of Mathematics (2001) University, New Orleans, Department of Philosophy (2001) Wikipedia Entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gomatam_Ravi Reviewer of Journals Synthese Journal of Consciousness Studies Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, India Section A (Physical Sciences) Selected Research Papers 1. Gomatam, R. (2020), On the Necessity of God to Science, Forthcoming, “Science, Religion and Big Questions”, Learning about Science and Religion (LASAR) Research Centre, Department of Education, University of Oxford, June 23, 2020. 2. Gomatam, R. (2020), On the Indivisibility of the Atom—Ancient Bhagavata Sankhya and Modern Quantum Theory, Forthcoming, “The 14th London Ancient Science Conference 2020”, University College London, Science and Technology Studies Department, February 17-21, 2020. 3. Gomatam, R. (2019), Einstein versus Bohr—Open versus Closed Epistemologies?, “Open Epistemologies” Conference, University of Portugal, Lisbon, September 20-21. 4. Gomatam, R. (2019), Biology, Information and Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics, Second Meeting of Philosophy in Biology and Medicine, University of Bordeaux, France Oct 14-15. 5. Gomatam, R. (2018), Complementarities beyond Bohr’s, International Congress of the History of Philosophy of Science (HOPOS), Groningen, Netherlands, July 9-12, 2018. 6. Gomatam, R. (2017), Quantum Mechanics and Experience, 10th Principia International Symposium, Florianópolis, Brazil, August 13-17, 2017. 7. Gomatam, R. (2017), The Central Dogma, Quantum Theory and Objective Semantic Information, Annual Meeting of the International Society for History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Biology (ISHPSSB), Sao Paulo, Brazil, July 16-21, 2017. 8. Gomatam, R. (2017), Is Physics Truly Empirical, Currently? Spring Meeting of the German Physical Society, Bremen, March 2017. 9. Anderson, G., Behera, R.N., Gomatam, R. (2016), A Theoretical Approach to Engineering a New Enzyme, Journal of Physics: 738 (2016) 012013. 10. Gomatam, R. (2016), Toward Relational Reality, in Ghose, P. (Ed.), Einstein, Tagore and the Nature of Reality, Routledge: London, pp. 86-105. 11. Gomatam, R. (2015), Objective Semantic Information and Quantum Local Causality, Causality in a Quantum World Conference, August 16-21. Conference part of the project, Causal Power of Information in a Quantum World, University of Queensland. 12. Gomatam, R. (2015), Toward Avoiding Nonlocality (and Locality) in Quantum Physics, Proceedings of the Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Vol 34 (1), June 14- 17, 2015, p. 145. 13. Gomatam, R. (2014), Toward Placing the Concept of Chemical Element on a New Quantum Footing, International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry, July 7-9, 2014, London. 14. Gomatam, R. (2014), Tandem Realism—Physics and Commonsense, unpublished manuscript. 15. Anderson, G., Gomatam, R., Behera, L. (2013), Contradictions in the Quantum Mechanical Explanation of the Periodic Table, Journal of Physics: 490 (2014) 012197. 16. Gomatam, R. (2013), A Critique of the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology, Chapter 9, Biology and Information, Kanwaljeet Kaur, M.S. Dissertation, Bhaktivedanta Institute. 17. Gomatam, R. (2012), A Quantum Model of Human Perception, Biologically Inspired System Science Conference, March 1-3, IIT, Jodhpur, India. 18. Gomatam, R. (2012), How Do Classical and Quantum Probabilities Differ? in Khrennikov, A. (Ed.), Foundations of Probability and Physics-6, American Institute of Physics, pp. 105-110. 19. Gomatam, R. (2010), Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics and System of Systems Design Approach, Indo- US Workshop on Systems Engineering, IIT Kanpur, Oct. 26-28. 20. Gomatam, R. (2009), Quantum Theory, the Chinese Room Argument and the Symbol Grounding Problem, in Bruza, P. et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 5494, pp. 174-183, Springer. “This paper contains the germ of an important idea, namely that the ontology underlying the science needs or exploit quantum mechanics in a way that allows basic entities to be signs/symbols that are representations of meanings to be manipulated in the way that certain shapes are thought to be manipulated in the classical physics conception of reality.” — Prof Henry Stapp 21. Gomatam, R. (2008), Quantum Realism and Haecceity, in Ghose, P. (Ed.), HSPCIC Vol. XII: Levels of Reality, Part 5: Materialism and Immaterialism in India and the West: Varying Vistas, CSC, New Delhi, pp. 853-872. 22. Gomatam, R. (2007), Niels Bohr‘s Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation—Are the two incompatible? Philosophy of Science, December, 74(5), pp. 736-748. Paper part of required reading in PHIL1620, Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, taught by Douglas Kutach at Dept of Philosophy, Brown University (Spring 2010). Students submitted a 2500-word assignment on this paper. 23. Gomatam, R. (2005), Popper‘s Propensity Interpretation and Heisenberg‘s Potentia Interpretation—A Comparative Assessment, in Chattopadhyaya, D. P. and Sengupta, P. (Eds.), HSPCIC: A Historical Perspective Of The Evolution Of Ideas In Science, Vol. XIII, Part 6 , Probabilities, Propensity and Corroboration, CSC: New Delhi, pp. 301-312. “Gomatam has proposed a new approach according to which quantum theory ought to use the terms statistics‘ or probability‘ to refer only to the occurrence of observable events and altogether renounce the notion of probabilities when talking about quantum ontological states.” — Prof. B.V. Sreekantan in Current Science, Journal of Indian Academy of Sciences, 2010 24. Gomatam, R. (2005), Do Hodgson's propositions uniquely characterize free will?, Invited commentary on a target paper, "A Plain Person's View of Free Will" by David Hodgson, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(1), pp. 32-40, Imprint Academic: UK. 25. Gomatam, R. (2004), Physics and Common Sense--Relearning the Connections in the Light of Quantum Theory, in Chattopadhyaya, D.P.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Invitation to Quantum Mechanics
    i Invitation to Quantum Mechanics Daniel F. Styer ii Invitation to Quantum Mechanics Daniel F. Styer Schiffer Professor of Physics, Oberlin College copyright c 31 May 2021 Daniel F. Styer The copyright holder grants the freedom to copy, modify, convey, adapt, and/or redistribute this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International License. A copy of that license is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode. You may freely download this book in pdf format from http://www.oberlin.edu/physics/dstyer/InvitationToQM: It is formatted to print nicely on either A4 or U.S. Letter paper. You may also purchase a printed and bound copy from World Scientific Publishing Company. In neither case does the author receive monetary gain from your download/purchase: it is reward enough for him that you want to explore quantum mechanics. Love all God's creation, the whole and every grain of sand in it. Love the stars, the trees, the thunderstorms, the atoms. The more you love, the more you will grow curious. The more you grow curious, the more you will question. The more you question, the more you will uncover. The more you uncover, the more you will love. And so at last you will come to love the entire universe with an agile and resilient love founded upon facts and understanding. | This improvisation by Dan Styer was inspired by the first sentence, which appears in Fyodor Dostoyevsky's The Brothers Karamazov. iii iv Dedicated to Linda Ong Styer, adventurer Contents Synoptic Contents 1 Welcome 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selected Bibliography of Publications By, and About, Niels Bohr
    A Selected Bibliography of Publications by, and about, Niels Bohr Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 09 June 2021 Version 1.308 Title word cross-reference + [VIR+08]. $1 [Duf46]. $1.00 [N.38, Bal39]. $105.95 [Dor79]. $11.95 [Bus20]. $12.00 [Kra07, Lan08]. $189 [Tan09]. $21.95 [Hub14]. $24.95 [RS07]. $29.95 [Gor17]. $32.00 [RS07]. $35.00 [Par06]. $47.50 [Kri91]. $6.95 [Sha67]. $61 [Kra16b]. $9 [Jam67]. − [VIR+08]. 238 [Tur46a, Tur46b]. ◦ [Fra55]. 2 [Som18]. β [Gau14]. c [Dar92d, Gam39]. G [Gam39]. h [Gam39]. q [Dar92d]. × [wB90]. -numbers [Dar92d]. /Hasse [KZN+88]. /Rath [GRE+01]. 0 [wB90, Hub14, Tur06]. 0-19-852049-2 [Ano93a, Red93, Seg93]. 0-19-853977-0 [Hub14]. 0-521-35366-1 [Kri91]. 0-674-01519-3 [Tur06]. 0-85224-458-4 [Hen86a]. 0-9672617-2-4 [Kra07, Lan08]. 1 2 1.5 [GRE+01]. 100-˚aret [BR+85]. 100th [BR+85, KRW05, Sch13, vM02]. 110th [Rub97a]. 121 [Boh87a]. 153 [MP97]. 16 [SE13]. 17 [Boh55a, KRBR62]. 175 [Bad83]. 18.11.1962 [Hei63a]. 1911 [Meh75]. 1915 [SE13]. 1915/16 [SE13, SE13]. 1918 [Boh21a]. 1920s [PP16]. 1922 [Boh22a]. 1923 [Ros18]. 1925 [Cla13, Bor13, Jan17, Sho13]. 1927 [Ano28]. 1929 [HEB+80, HvMW79, Pye81]. 1930 [Lin81, Whe81]. 1930/41 [Fer68, Fer71]. 1930s [Aas85b, Stu79]. 1933 [CCJ+34].
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Ravi V. Gomatam Prof. Ravi V. Gomatam
    Prof. Ravi V. Gomatam Curriculum Vitae Director , Institute of Semantic Information Sciences & Technology, Berkeley Mumbai Adjunct Professor , Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India Contact Info Email: [email protected] India: Juhu Road, Juhu, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 049, India +91-22-2620-2332 (board line), +91-99-6797-5499 (cell) USA: PO Box 3206, Berkeley, CA 94703, USA +1-510-841-7618 (main), +1-510-868-4957 (direct) Wikipedia entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gomatam_Ravi Education • (1998) Ph.D. in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Mumbai University, India • (1974) M.E. in Electronics Engineering, BITS, Pilani, India • (1972) B.E. in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Annamalai University, India Fields of Research Interest Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics; Semantic Information; Semantic web; Semantic Computing; Macroscopic Quantum Computing; Foundations of Chemistry; Complex Analysis; Exotic Manifolds; Complexity and Information; Entropy and Information; Quantum Signal Processing; Biology and Information. Career Summary Professor Ravi Gomatam is an NRI research scientist, who has lived over three decades in the USA, working in both industry and later in full-time research & academic positions. After obtaining his Masters degree in electronics engineering from India, he moved to the USA in the early 1970s, ran his own consultancy firm in the areas of operating system design, data communications and very-large 1 database design, and carried out projects for many fortune-500 companies including General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Burroughs and IBM. In the mid 1980s, he turned to academics, obtaining his Ph.D. in the foundations of quantum mechanics, which remains his area of active research. He now does full-time research and graduate level teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Theory, the Chinese Room Argument and the Symbol Grounding Problem Abstract
    Quantum Theory, the Chinese Room Argument and the * Symbol Grounding Problem Ravi Gomatam † [email protected] Abstract: I o ffer an alternative to Searle’s original Chinese Room argument which I call the Sanskrit Room argument (SRA). SRA distinguishes between syntactic TOKEN and semantic SYMBOL manipulations and shows that both are involved in human language understanding. Within classical mechanics, which gives an adequate scientific account of TOKEN manipulation, a symbol remains a subjective construct. I describe how an objective, quantitative theory of semantic symbols could be developed by applying the Schrodinger equation directly to macroscopic objects independent of Born’s rule and hence independent of current statistical quantum mechanics. Such a macroscopic quantum mechanics opens the possibility for developing a new theory of computing wherein the Universal Turing Machine (UTM) performs semantic symbol manipulation and models macroscopic quantum computing. 1. Introduction This paper seeks to relate quantum mechanics to artificial intelligence, human language, and cognition. It is a position paper, reporting some relevant details of a long-term research program currently in progress. In his justly famous Chinese Room Argument (CRA), Searle argued that “we could not give the capacity to understand Chinese or English [that humans evidently have] to a machine where the operation of the machine is solely defined as the instantiation of a computer program.” ([1], p. 422) Searle avoided the need to positively define ‘human understanding’ by relying on an operator (such as himself) who does not understand Chinese in any sense. Skipping the details of this well-known paper, Searle’s main conclusions were as follows: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HYLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS 1. Introduction In
    HYLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS ANTONY VAN DER MUDE Abstract. Philosophers have long pondered the Problem of Universals. Socrates and Plato hypothesized that the Universals exist independent of the real world in a universe of their own. The Doctrine of the Forms was criticized by Aristo- tle, who stated that the Universals do not exist apart from things | a theory known as Hylomorphism. This paper postulates that Measurement in Quan- tum Mechanics is the process that gives rise to the instantiation of Universals as Particulars, a process we refer to as Hylomorphic Functions. Measurements of fundamental properties of matter are the atomic Universals of metaphysics. These atomic Universals in turn combine to become the whole range of Univer- sals. This leads to a type of metaphysical Realism. We look at this hypothesis in relation to two different interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. The first is the Copenhagen Interpretation, which we consider a version of Platonic Real- ism based on wave function collapse. The other interpretation is Pilot Wave Theory of Bohm and de Broglie, where particle{particle interactions take the place of measurement, leading to an Aristotelian metaphysics. This interpreta- tion of metaphysical realism makes the instantiation of Particulars a physical process grounded in Quantum Mechanics. This view of Universals explains the distinction between pure information and the medium that instantiates it, the arrow of time and the existence of qualia. 1. Introduction In contemporary research on the relationship between Quantum Mechanics and Metaphysics, the analysis of ontology mostly focuses on objects that have a physical 1 2 ANTONY VAN DER MUDE reality. This leaves out the nature of Universals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Presenting Religion
    THE SCIENCE OF PRESENTING RELIGION Srila Prabhupada’s Profound and Novel Instructions Rasaraja Dasa (Prof. Ravi Gomatam, M.E., Ph. D) Srila Prabhupada advocated scientific presentations of Krishna Consciousness according to the scientific method, without mentioning Vedas and Puranas. Popular presentations to general public based on the former can follow. What did Srila Prabhupada say about the term in vogue, “scientific preaching”? His Divine Grace Srila A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada “We have formed the Bhaktivedanta Institute for organizing scientific presentations of Krishna Consciousness. This party is our most important preaching arm.” [Letter to Dravida, April 2, 1977] Readers interested in the subject matter may correspond with The Institute of Semantic Information Sciences and Technology www.insist.ac.in [email protected] The Bhaktivedanta Institute www.bvinst.edu [email protected] © Ravi Gomatam. All rights reserved THE SCIENCE OF PRESENTING RELIGION n this paper, we describe two kinds of scientific presentations of Krishna Consciousness: one to scientists, and the other to the general public. The forum for presentations to scientists is technical papers published in peer‐reviewed journals, science conferences and the like. The forum for popular presentations is general articles, popular science books, multimedia presentations, etc. We will show that the second kind of scientific presentations must follow, i.e. be necessarily based on, and grow in proportion to how the first category of scientific presentations to scientists are done and have been accepted by scientists. We will propose that such scientific presentations are what Srila Prabhupada wanted, by supplying quotes. At the Institute of Semantic Information Sciences and Technology, and the Bhaktivedanta Institute at Mumbai and Berkeley, we have been carrying out these two kinds of scientific presentations diligently and with great success.
    [Show full text]
  • The Central Mystery of Quantum Mechanics
    The Central Mystery of Quantum Mechanics Partha Ghose∗ Centre for Natural Sciences and Philosophy, 1/AF Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata, 700 064, India and Centre for Philosophy and Foundations of Science, Darshan Sadan, E-36 Panchshila Park, New Delhi 110017, India May 31, 2018 Abstract A critical re-examination of the double-slit experiment and its variants is presented to clarify the nature of what Feynmann called the “central mystery” and the “only mystery” of quantum mechan- ics, leading to an interpretation of complementarity in which a ‘wave and particle’ description rather than a ‘wave or particle’ description is valid for the same experimental set up, with the wave culminating in the particle sequentially in time. This interpretation is different from Bohr’s but is consistent with the von Neumann formulation as well as some more recent interpretations of quantum mechanics. arXiv:0906.0898v1 [quant-ph] 4 Jun 2009 Keywords: wave-particle duality, complementarity, central mystery, quantum mechanics 1 INTRODUCTION Thomas Young is believed to have carried out his famous double-slit exper- iment with light in 1801. It was one of the key experiments that helped ∗[email protected] 1 overthrow the corpuscular theory of light favoured by Newton and estab- lish the wave theory favoured by Christiaan Huygens and Augustin Fresnel. However, when classical light was replaced by single-photon/particle sources and detectors in the 20th century, the old wave-particle controversy was re- vived because it revealed a mysterious dual character of light. According to Feynman it contains “the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery.
    [Show full text]
  • HYLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS 1. Introduction in Contemporary Research on the Relationship Between Quantum Mechanics and Metaphysics, Th
    HYLOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS ANTONY VAN DER MUDE Abstract. Philosophers have long pondered the Problem of Universals. Socrates and Plato hypothesized that the Universals exist independent of the real world in a universe of their own. The Doctrine of the Forms was criticized by Aristo- tle, who stated that the Universals do not exist apart from things | a theory known as Hylomorphism. This paper postulates that Measurement in Quan- tum Mechanics is the process that gives rise to atomic Universals, which we refer to as hylomorphic functions. These atomic Universals in turn combine to become the whole range of Universals. This leads to a type of metaphys- ical Realism, where Universals are contingent on the hylomorphic functions that bring them into being. We look at this hypothesis in relation to two different interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. The first is the Copenhagen Interpretation, which we consider a version of Platonic Realism based on wave function collapse. The other interpretation is Pilot Wave Theory of Bohm and de Broglie, where particle-particle interactions take the place of measurement, leading to an Aristotelian metaphysics. This view of Universals explains the distinction between pure information and the medium that instantiates it, the existence of qualia and the arrow of time. 1. Introduction In contemporary research on the relationship between Quantum Mechanics and Metaphysics, the analysis of ontology mostly focuses on objects that have a physical reality. This leaves out the nature of Universals. As an example, Allori [?] analyzes 1 2 ANTONY VAN DER MUDE which components of Quantum Mechanics form a primitive ontology but excludes the mathematical objects from consideration: Why the qualification primitive ontology, instead of just ontology simpliciter? First, the idea is that the primitive ontology does not exhaust all the ontology | it just accounts for physical objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Realism and Haecceity 1. INTRODUCTION
    Quantum Realism and Haecceity RAVI GOMATAM Bhaktivedanta Institute, 2334 Stuart Street, Berkeley, CA 94705 [email protected] [Published in History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization. Volume XII. Materialism and Immaterialism in India and the West:Varying Vistas, Partha Ghose (editor) part 5, CSC: New Delhi, pp. 853-872.] haec.ce.ity [hek-see-etee] noun The essential property that makes an individual uniquely that individual – Encarta The quality implied in the use of this, as this man; thisness; hereness and nowness; that quality or mode of being in virtue of which a thing is or becomes a definite individual; individuality - OED 1. INTRODUCTION Non-relativistic quantum mechanics is incompatible with our everyday or ‘classical’ intuitions about realism, not only at the microscopic level but also at the macroscopic level. The latter point is highlighted by the ‘cat paradox’ presented by Schrödinger. Since our observations are always made at the macroscopic level — even when applying the formalism to the microscopic level — the failure of classical realism at the macroscopic level is actually more fundamental and crucial. This paper is part of a larger research program aimed at applying non-relativistic quantum theory to the macroscopic world, but without requiring its description to reduce to classical physics. Such an application would have to be independent of the current, microscopic statistical quantum mechanics (SQM), which presupposes the ‘classicality’ of the macroscopic world. Therefore, the proposed macroscopic quantum mechanics (MQM) should not be expected to reproduce the probabilistic predictions of SQM. This point marks a fundamental departure from the route of decoherence.
    [Show full text]