Cimetidine Reduces Weight and Improves Metabolic Control in Overweight Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
International Journal of Obesity (1998) 22, 1041±1045 ß 1998 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0307±0565/98 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/ijo Cimetidine reduces weight and improves metabolic control in overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes G Stùa-Birketvedt*1, PN Paus3, R Ganss3, OC Ingebretsen2 and J Florholmen1 1Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsù, Tromsù; 2Biochemical Department, University Hospital of Tromsù, Tromsù; and 3Medical Department, Central Hospital of Akershus, Nordbyhagen, Norway OBJECTIVE: To investigate the weight-reducing effect of cimetidine in overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: A 12-week clinical intervention study of 400 mg cimetidine prescribed three times daily in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. SUBJECTS: Forty-three overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes (age 18±65 y, body mass index (BMI) 27.2± 48.2 kg=m2). MEASUREMENTS: Body weight, BMI, body fat, waist and hip circumference, waist=hip ratio, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, plasma concentrations of insulin, insulin=glucose ratio and lipids at the start and after 12 weeks, and daily recordings of appetite. RESULTS: Subjects given cimetidine (n 19) and placebo (n 24) lost 5.0Æ 2.2 kg (meanÆ s.d.) and 1.3Æ 1.1 kg, respectively. Signi®cant reductions were observed in appetite, body fat (29.9Æ 6.6% to 25.3Æ 7.4%), waist circumfer- ence (111.5Æ 10.3 cm to 107.4Æ 10.6 cm), waist=hip ratio (0.96Æ 0.08 to 0.94 Æ 0.08), and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (reductions of 6.9Æ 11.4 mm Hg and 6.0Æ 6.6 mm Hg, respectively) in cimetidine group only. Signi®cant decreases in fasting concentrations of blood glucose, HbA1c, plasma insulin, insulin=glucose ratio, plasma triglycerides and a signi®cant increase in plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were observed in the cimetidine group only. CONCLUSIONS: Cimetidine reduces appetite and body weight, and improves metabolic control in overweight subjects with Type 2 diabetes. Keywords: H2-receptor antagonist; hyperlipidemia; insulin resistance; obesity; weight reduction Introduction heterogeneous pathogenesis, with interactions at least between visceral obesity and genetic factors.11 We have previously reported that the H -receptor According to previous reports, there is a high pre- 2 antagonist, cimetidine, reduces weight in healthy valence of Type 2 diabetes among obese subjects.1,2 overweight subjects.12 The mechanism of this effect Hyperinsulinism and insulin resistance are character- is unknown. In rats, H -receptor antagonists reduce istic features of both Type 2 diabetes and obesity (for 2 appetite and weight gain by a non-gastric acid related review, see Ref. 3). In obese subjects the insulin mechanism.13 We have shown that cholecystokinin resistance is highly correlated to the mass of visceral (CCK) is a candidate mediator of this effect on fat.4,5 However, it remains controversial whether satiety.14 obesity is the major and=or an independent contributor The objective of this study was to investigate the to the insulin resistance in Type 2 diabetes.6,7 effect of cimetidine on body weight and metabolic It is well recognized that weight reduction is pro®le in overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes in associated with bene®cial effects on metabolic con- a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. trol.8 A modest weight reduction may strongly improve the metabolic pro®le.9 Weight reduction induces improved glycemic control, reduced hepatic glucose output, increased insulin action in the liver and the peripheral tissue, and improved insulin secre- Materials and methods tion.10 However, a weight reduction to normalcy elicits a complete normalization of the peripheral insulin action in only few patients.10 This implies a Subjects Sixty-two patients with Type 2 diabetes were recruited from the outpatient ®les of two Norwegian hospitals. The inclusion criteria were age 18±65 y and *Correspondence: Dr Grethe Stùa-Birketvedt, University of body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg=m2. Patients with Pennsylvania, 3600 Market Street, Suite 732, 19104 PA, USA. Received 11 September 1997; revised 21 May 1998; accepted serious cardial, renal or hepatic diseases were 26 May 1998 excluded. Patients treated with antacids, gastric acid Cimetidine reduces weight G Stùa-Birketvedt et al 1042 antisecretory agents, insulin or corticosteroids were Ethics also excluded. The study was conducted according to the Helsinki declarations and with the approval of the Ethical Committee of The Health Region V, Norway. Study design The patients were randomized into two groups accord- Statistical analysis ing to BMI: the ®rst group, cimetidine (400 mg): Statistical analysis was performed in those patients (Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) and the second group who ful®lled the study according to the protocol. placebo (identical in taste and appearance as cimeti- Differences in consecutive weight changes between dine) (Pharmaceutical Department, University Hospi- the cimetidine and placebo group were evaluated tal of Tromsù, Tromsù, Norway), prescribed three using repeated measures multivariate analysis of var- times daily, 30 min before meals. Patients were told iance (RM MANOVA). Loss in appetite was de®ned to follow their own diet or eat less if not hungry, to as a decrease of > 10% in the mean visual analogue perform their regular exercise program and not change scale (VAS) during treatment of an individual patient. their smoking habits during the study. The cimetidine Signi®cance between the treatment groups was tested dose was twice as high as that used in the former by comparing the fraction of patients with loss in 12 study as it seemed to induce a stronger feeling of appetite in each group by using Fisher-Irwin exact satiety (unpublished observation). This dose also test. In the remaining parameters, the signi®cance was 14 increases the postprandial CCK response. tested for within-group comparison by paired Stu- At the start, a physical examination was performed, dent's t test, and for between-group comparison by including sitting blood pressure, height, weight, unpaired t tests. The signi®cance level was set at abdominal circumference (umbilical level), and hip P < 0.05. circumference (tuberculum majus). BMI was calcu- lated as kg=m2. Body fat % was measured with near infrared technique (Futrex 5000: Futrex Corp., Gaithersburg, MA) as previously described.15 These Results procedures were repeated at the end of the study. Duration of the study was 12 weeks, with clinic visits scheduled at the same time each week. Subjects Subjects were weighed each week, side effects were recorded Of the 62 subjects (31 in each group) randomized to and the average degree of hunger before breakfast, active and placebo treatment, 60 subjects (31=29, in lunch and supper during the previous week was the cimetidine and placebo group, respectively) recorded on a 10 cm visual analogue scale. Compli- entered the study, that is, two patients were lost at ance with the drug treatment was checked by the inclusion due to reasons unknown (Table 1). Five of returned dose packets; 80% compliance was consid- the patients were not included due to sudden events ered acceptable. between the randomization and the start. Twelve subjects were excluded, four subjects due to side effects (one placebo subject with diarrhoea and three cimetidine subjects, one each with arthralgia, abdom- Laboratory tests inal pain and vomiting). After termination of the Blood samples were drawn after an overnight fast at treatment all subjects recovered completely. In the the start and after 12 weeks. The blood samples were remaining patients the medication was well tolerated. withdrawn into vacutainer tubes containing EDTA The remaining 43 subjects (19=24), 14 women and 29 (1 mg=ml, ®nal concentration), and centrifuged at men, completed the study according to the protocol. 1000 g for 10 min at 4C. Blood glucose was mea- sured by a glucose analyzer (Model 2300 STAT, Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Inc., Yellow Springs, Table 1 Patients included and excluded OH). The rest of the plasma was immediately frozen Cimetidine Placebo Total (727 C) and stored for later measurements. HbA1c was measured by the Diamat TM system from Bio-Rad Randomized 31 31 62 Failed to initiate the study 0 2 2 Laboratories GmbH (Munich, Germany). Insulin was Lack of ful®lling the inclusion criteria 4 1 5 measured by a radioimmunoassay (RIA) method.16 Initiated the study 27 28 55 Plasma concentrations of cholesterol and triglycerides Excluded due to Side effects 3 1 4 were measured using Hitachi 917 Automatic Analyzer Withdrawals not related to 3 1 4 from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). treatment Reagents, calibrators and controls were purchased Changes in smoking habits 1 1 Immobilization (bone fracture) 1 1 from the manufacturer. High-density lipoprotein Use of antacids 1 1 (HDL) cholesterol concentrations in plasma were Start of peroral antidiabetic agents 1 1 measured after preparation of HDL according to the Total of excluded patients 8 4 12 Total of evaluable patients 19 24 43 method described by Burstein et al.17 Cimetidine reduces weight G Stùa-Birketvedt et al 1043 Characteristics of patients plasma concentrations of insulin and insulin=glucose Characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 2. ratio (Table 4). In the cimetidine group there were At the start of the study there were no signi®cant signi®cant reductions in the levels of HbA1c, insulin differences between age, gender, duration of Type 2 and insulin=glucose ratio, but no signi®cant changes diabetes, patients on peroral antidiabetic medication, in the placebo group were observed. body weight, BMI, fat %, waist and hip circumfer- There were no signi®cant differences in baseline ences or waist=hip ratio (WHR). plasma levels of cholesterol, triglycerides and HDL During the ®rst week of treatment, appetite mea- cholesterol between the two groups (Table 4).